Next Article in Journal
Analysis on the Effects of External Temperature and Welding Speed on the Safety of EVA Waterproofing Sheet Joints by Hot Air Welding
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Zeolite Features on the Dehydration Reaction of Methanol to Dimethyl Ether: Catalytic Behaviour and Kinetics
Article

Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction

1
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
2
Institute of Molecular Medicine “Angelo Nocivelli”, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
3
Metallurgical and Powders Technologies Lab, Institute of Metals, Technion City, Haifa 320003, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(23), 5584; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235584
Received: 2 November 2020 / Revised: 3 December 2020 / Accepted: 4 December 2020 / Published: 7 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Manufacturing Processes and Systems)
The 3D printing process offers several advantages to the medical industry by producing complex and bespoke devices that accurately reproduce customized patient geometries. Despite the recent developments that strongly enhanced the dominance of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques over conventional methods, processes need to be continually optimized and controlled to obtain implants that can fulfill all the requirements of the surgical procedure and the anatomical district of interest. The best outcomes of an implant derive from optimal compromise and balance between a good interaction with the surrounding tissue through cell attachment and reduced inflammatory response mainly caused by a weak interface with the native tissue or bacteria colonization of the implant surface. For these reasons, the chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties of a device need to be designed in order to assure the best performances considering the in vivo environment components. In particular, complex 3D geometries can be produced with high dimensional accuracy but inadequate surface properties due to the layer manufacturing process that always entails the use of post-processing techniques to improve the surface quality, increasing the lead times of the whole process despite the reduction of the supply chain. The goal of this work was to provide a comparison between Ti6Al4V samples fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM) with different building directions in relation to the building plate. The results highlighted the influence of the process technique on osteoblast attachment and mineralization compared with the building orientation that showed a limited effect in promoting a proper osseointegration over a long-term period. View Full-Text
Keywords: powder bed fusion; selective laser melting; electron beam melting; building orientation; titanium; osseointegration powder bed fusion; selective laser melting; electron beam melting; building orientation; titanium; osseointegration
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ginestra, P.; Ferraro, R.M.; Zohar-Hauber, K.; Abeni, A.; Giliani, S.; Ceretti, E. Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction. Materials 2020, 13, 5584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235584

AMA Style

Ginestra P, Ferraro RM, Zohar-Hauber K, Abeni A, Giliani S, Ceretti E. Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction. Materials. 2020; 13(23):5584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ginestra, Paola, Rosalba M. Ferraro, Keren Zohar-Hauber, Andrea Abeni, Silvia Giliani, and Elisabetta Ceretti. 2020. "Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction" Materials 13, no. 23: 5584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235584

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop