Review Reports
- Gloria E. Uwaya1,2,
- Omolola E. Fayemi1,2,* and
- El-Sayed M. Sherif3,4
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please find the attached document for the comments.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please find the attached document.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Please show attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Please see attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 3
Reviewer 2 Report
The sentences from L353 to 357 is complicated and too long to understand. It became worse than before the correction by making two sentences into one sentence with deleting some informations.
"The Ipa for the SPCE-Fe3O4-NPL was found to be six times higher than the bare SPCE and three times higher than SPCE-Fe3O4-NPF suggesting SPCE-Fe3O4-NPL to be more electrically conductive than SPCE-Fe3O4-NPF suggesting excellent ionic interaction among the nanoparticles, large surface area which in turn allowed free flow of ions/electrolyte in and out of the electrode surface."
It is better to be recorrected.