Next Article in Journal
Separation of Water in Diesel Using Filter Media Containing Kapok Fibers
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Study on the Mechanical Properties of Different 3D Woven Carbon Fiber-Epoxy Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation Development and Computational Optimization for Directed Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing Process
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/ma13112665
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rivet-Inspired Modification of Aramid Fiber by Decorating with Silica Particles to Enhance the Interfacial Interaction and Mechanical Properties of Rubber Composites

by
Yihang Li
,
Yuzhu Xiong
* and
Qingpo Zhang
*
Department of Polymer Material and Engineering, College of Materials and Metallurgy, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(11), 2665; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112665
Submission received: 26 April 2020 / Revised: 5 June 2020 / Accepted: 8 June 2020 / Published: 11 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Composite Materials: Theory, Design and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A rivet–inspired method of decorating aramid fiber (AF) with silica particles (SiO2) is proposed to produce SiO2@AF hybrid materials that have largely enhanced interfacial interaction with the rubber matrix. AF was firstly surface-modified with polyacrylic acid (PAA) to obtain PAA–AF, and SiO2 was silanized with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane to obtain APES–SiO2. Then, SiO2@AF was prepared by chemically bonding APES–SiO2 onto the surface of PAA–AF in the presence of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). With the incorporation of SiO2@AF into the rubber matrix, SiO2@AF hybrid materials with high surface roughness can play a role as ‘rivets’ to immobilize large numbers of rubber chains on the surface. The tear strength and tensile strength of rubber composite that filling 4 phr SiO2@AF are dramatically increased by 97.8% and 89.3% compared to pure rubber, respectively. Furthermore, SiO2@AF has superiority in enhancing the cutting resistance of rubber composites, in contrast with unmodified AF and SiO2. SiO2@AF is suitable to be applied as a novel reinforcing filler in rubber composites for high performance.

1. Introduction

Natural rubber (NR), an important biopolymer, has been presented as one of the most attractive materials owing to its wonderful properties, such as great elasticity and flexibility, antivirus permeation, low cost and corrosion resistance [1,2,3]. However, NR usually needs to be reinforced with various fillers for most practical applications in diverse areas (e.g., tires, sealing material, sport equipment, surgical gloves and adhesives), due to its inherent low strength and modulus [4,5]. For decades, SiO2 particles have been widely applied as active fillers in rubber composites to enhance their mechanical properties and to deliver multi-functional characteristics [6,7]. Compared to traditional carbon black, SiO2 can effectively improve wet skid resistance and show higher abrasion resistance for tires, and is an ideal filler for the preparation of green tires [8,9]. At the same time, tires filled with SiO2 particles have lower rolling resistance, which has the great advantage of reducing vehicle energy consumption. Although SiO2 particles are extensively assumed as a superior substitute to common carbon black, inhibiting SiO2 particles from aggregating is extremely challenging because of their high surface energy and large surface area [10]. Heavily hydrophilic SiO2 particles exhibit a rather poor compatibility with hydrophobic rubber, which leads to weak interfacial adhesion between SiO2 and the rubber matrix. These devilish puzzles seriously impede the popularization and application of SiO2 fillers in rubber systems [11].
Currently, aramid fiber (AF) is an indispensable material in many fields and has become one of most excellent reinforcing fillers for high-performance composites due to its unique properties, for example its low specific density, thermal resistance, super fatigue, ultrahigh strength and modulus, and good chemical stability [12]. Aramid fiber reinforced rubber composite material combines the flexibility and high elasticity of rubber with the rigidity of fiber material, which has excellent mechanical properties, cutting resistance, tear resistance, puncture resistance and other properties [13,14,15]. Aramid fiber/rubber composite can be processed and formed by conventional rubber processing equipment like other rubber compounding agents. Aramid fiber reinforced rubber can reduce the weight and rolling resistance of tires, so as to prepare new composite materials with great potential for the development of ‘green tires’. However, AF commonly possesses a smooth and chemically inert surface, lacking functional groups, which leads to chemical and/or mechanical interlocking resistance to the polymer matrix [16]. Hence, it is difficult to acquire superior interfacial adhesion between virgin AF and the polymer matrix, heavily affecting the performance of its composites [17,18]. As described in many publications, numerous methods have been carried out to improve the interfacial interaction of AF with the polymer matrix, including plasma treatments [19], γ–ray irradiation [20], chemical etching [21], surface grafting [22] and direct fluorination [23]. However, chemical oxidation or etching damages the AF structures and lowers the strength to some extent. Furthermore, physical modification methods are usually performed under extremely rigorous conditions, leading to high costs [16]. Chemical grafting can only introduce a small number of functional groups on the AF surface, which limitedly improves the interfacial adhesion [22]. In addition, grafting a certain group onto the AF surface is only suitable for specific matrix materials, and a series of tedious and time-consuming pre-processes are commonly required for successful grafting [24].
Inspired by the rivet, depositing particles, for example SiO2 particles, onto the AF surface can greatly enhance the surface roughness and can effectively prevent AF from pulling out of the matrix. Therefore, depositing is an efficient fiber-modifying method with the advantages of fiber structures, repairing defects on the fiber surface and being compatible with different kinds of matrices [25]. Moreover, the decoration of SiO2 on the AF surface lends itself to overcoming the aggregation of individual particles. In previous reports, SiO2 particles have commonly been combined on the AF surface by the sol–gel process [22,26], or by the colloidal dispersion method. However, to the best of our knowledge, only a small number of nanoscale SiO2 particles are bonded onto the AF surface by the above-mentioned techniques.
In this article, a mass of SiO2 macroparticles (48 wt%) were deposited on the AF surface by chemical bonding. A schematic diagram of preparing the AF decorated by SiO2 (SiO2@AF) is presented in Figure 1. Through our previous work and the reports of other scholars, it was found that the use of ultraviolet radiation can break the acylamino bond on the surface and can form new carboxyl and amino groups [27,28,29]. AF and SiO2 were modified with polyacrylic acid (PAA) and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APES), respectively. In sequence, SiO2 particles were adsorbed on the AF surface by the electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged carboxyl on the PAA grafting AF (PAA–AF) and the positively charged amino on the APES modified SiO2 particles (APES–SiO2). The amidation of carboxyl and amino can promote the combination of SiO2 particles with AF, due to the existence of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). Then, the resultant SiO2@AF was incorporated into the rubber matrix to manufacture SiO2@AF/NR composites. SiO2@AF, with its high surface roughness, plays a role as a ‘rivet’ to better immobilize the NR chains on the filler surface. The interfacial adhesion between SiO2@AF and the NR matrix is greatly improved with the incremental fraction of immobilized chains, which results in the improvement of the mechanical properties and cutting resistance of SiO2@AF/NR composites.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Aramid fiber (AF; 1500 D, 1670 dtex) was purchased from DuPont (Wilmington, DE, USA) and cut to 3–5 cm in length before use. Silica (SiO2), with the trademark TS-180, was supplied by Changzhou Lehuan Chemical Co. Ltd (Changzhou, China). Polyacrylic acid (PAA), dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), ethanol, tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APES) of analytical grade were obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Company (Shanghai, China). The rubber ingredients, including zinc oxide (ZnO), stearic acid (SA), diphenyl hydrazine (D), 2-thiol benzothiazole (M), 2,6′-dithiodibenzothiazole (DM), tetramethylthiuram disulfide (TMTD), antioxidant 4010NA and sulfur (S) were of industrial grade and used without purification.

2.2. Grafting PAA onto AF

AF was ultrasonically cleaned in acetone solution and irradiated below a UV lamp for 8 min for pretreatment, with a relative humidity (RH) of 65 RH%. UV radiation can, in a short time, destroy the surface chemical structure of AF and can form new groups without affecting its core structure (Figures S1 and S2). AF 4.0 g, PAA 5.0 g, DCC 5.0 g and DMAP 0.5 g were dispersed into 500 mL THF under sonication for 1h. Then, the mixture was heated at 60 °C for 24 h to complete the amidation reaction. Finally, the product was filtered and washed with deionized water, and then dried in an oven at 80 °C until a constant weight was obtained. In this reaction, the number of carboxyl groups is excessive in order to remove the amino group from the surface of the AF.

2.3. Silanization of SiO2

First, 5.0 g SiO2 was added into 300 mL ethanol/deionized water (5:5, volume ratio) under sonication to achieve a well-dispersed SiO2 suspension. Subsequently, 2 mL APES was added into the SiO2 suspension. The mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 12 h to accomplish the silanization. The product (APES–SiO2) was filtrated, washed with ethanol and dried overnight at 60 °C in a vacuum oven.

2.4. Preparation of SiO2@AF

First, 4.0 g PAA–AF and 6.0 g APES–SiO2 were dispersed in 400 mL THF solution under sonication for 0.5 h. Then, the mixture was stirred mildly for another 0.5 h to perform the electrostatic assembly between the negatively charged PAA–AF and the positively charged APES–SiO2. Finally, 2.0 g DCC and 0.5 g DMAP were added, and the reaction was maintained at 60 °C for 48 h. In order to deposit as much SiO2 on the AF surface as possible, the amount of APES–SiO2 was excessive. Thus, SiO2@AF hybrid materials with 48 wt% SiO2 particles were obtained by drying at 60 °C overnight, after filtering the remaining APES–SiO2 and washing with deionized water.

2.5. Preparation of the Natural Rubber Composites

NR was compounded with the ingredients and SiO2@AF on a two–roll mixer at room temperature. The basic formulation of the NR composites is shown in Table 1. SiO2@AF/NR composites were vulcanized at 143 °C up to the optimum time, as determined by a Rubber Process Analyzer (RPA). Furthermore, SiO2+AF/NR composites (SiO2+AF represents the mixture filler of untreated SiO2 and AF with a weight ratio of 48:52) were prepared following a similar process.

2.6. Characterization

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was recorded by a Thermo Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) in the 4000–600 cm−1 region at room temperature. A resolution of 4 cm−1 and a total accumulation of 24 scans were applied to obtain the high signal-to-noise spectra. In order to analyze the chemical elements of PAA–AF, APES–SiO2 and SiO2@AF, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis was conducted on an XPS analyzer (K-Alpha, Thermo, Waltham, MD, USA) with Al Kα radiation under an X-ray power of 150 W. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a thermogravimetric analyzer (TA Q50, Newcastle, DE, USA) at a heating rate of 20 °C/min from 30 to 800 °C. Then, samples of 15 mg were isolated in a dry nitrogen atmosphere with a purge rate of 80 mL/min. The morphology of unmodified AF and SiO2@AF was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM; JSM-7500F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. All of the fiber surfaces were sprayed with gold to prevent electrostatic charging. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were carried out on a DSC instrument (Q20, TA, Newcastle, DE, USA) with a nitrogen flow of 40 mL/min. Samples with a weight of 7–8 mg were scanned from 70 to 100 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C/min. The mechanical properties of the NR composites and pure NR were investigated using a universal testing machine (Hegewald & Peschke, Berlin, Germany). Specimens with a dumbbell shape were used for tensile characterizations according to GB/T 528–1998 at a crosshead speed of 500 mm/min. Tear tests were carried out with right-angle samples according to GB/T 529–1999. A cutting tester (RCC–1, Beijing Wanhui Yifang Science and Technology Development Company, Beijing, China) was utilized to analyze the cut resistance of the NR composites and the pure NR. The strip specimens were rolled at a speed of 720 cpm under a cutting frequency of 120 Hz for 20 min, and the loss of mass was recorded every 4 min. The weight loss was recorded as a function of cutting time in the measurement process.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterizations of SiO2@AF

The grafting degree of PAA–AF and APES–SiO2 can be quantitatively evaluated by TGA. Figure 2a illustrates the TGA curves of neat SiO2, APES–SiO2, AF and PAA–AF. For all of the specimens, the weight loss at a temperature lower than 100 °C is mainly due to the evaporation of physically adsorbed water. The mass loss of pristine SiO2 exhibits another decomposition stage at 200–600 °C, which is attributed to the dehydration of the silanol groups [30]. In the TGA trace of AF, the sharp weight loss from approximately 500–600 °C represents the partial dihydroxylation and alkoxide decomposition of AF [31]. In addition, the PAA–AF fibers began to decompose at 180 °C due to the grafting of PAA (Figure 2a), and the weight loss between 500 and 800 °C further decreased to 41.4%. As shown in the TGA curves of APES–SiO2 and PAA–AF, it can be inferred that the grafting modification has little influence on the decomposition of the SiO2 or AF matrices. Thus, the weight loss percentage of the matrix (SiO2 or AF) at the temperature of 100–800 °C in both the untreated and treated samples is identical.
Taking AF as an example, the weight loss ratio (ε) of the aramid fiber matrix between 100 and 800 °C in PAA–AF is equal to that in pristine AF, which can be expressed as [32]
ε = M A 100 − M A 800 M A 100
where MA100 (99.8%) and MA800 (43.6%) represent the residual weight percentage of AF at 100 °C and 800 °C, respectively.
Considering that the grafting PAA is completely degraded during the heating process, the grafting content (χ) can be figured out with the help of Equation (2):
χ = ( M P 100 − M P 800 ) − M P 100 × ε 1 − ε ÷ M P 100
where MP100 (99.3 %) and MP800 (41.4%) stand for the residual weight percentage of PAA–AF at 100 °C and 800 °C, respectively. After calculation, the grafting content (χ) of PAA–AF is 4.56%. In addition, the grafting content of APES–SiO2 is calculated to be 3.07% by the same equations.
Figure 2b presents the FTIR spectra of AF, PAA–AF, SiO2, APES–SiO2 and SiO2@AF in the region of 600–4000 cm−1. As shown in Figure 2b, the C–N stretching peak at 1392 cm−1, N–H bending peak at 1548 cm−1 and C=O stretching peak at 1630 cm−1 can be found in the AF and PAA–AF spectra [33]. By contrast with common AF, the new absorption band assigned to –OH in the carboxyl groups is clearly observed at 3318 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum of PAA–AF [34], which can be attributed to the carboxyl group from PAA. In addition, the peaks at 2970 cm−1 for the PAA–AF can be ascribed to the stretching vibrations of the methylene groups from PAA. Compared to AF, PAA–AF showed a broader and stronger band around 1548 cm−1, 1630 cm−1 and 1392 cm−1 (aromatic rings, amide I and amide П) due to the introduction of PAA by the acylamino bond [35]. Figure 3 shows the SEM image of AF and PAA–AF, and it clear that the surface AF is very smooth (Figure 3a), whereas the PAA–AF is obviously covered by a rough grafted layer (Figure 3b). Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that PAA was successfully deposited on the AF surface.
In the SiO2 FTIR spectrum, the peaks observed at 3450 cm−1 and 1630 cm−1 are related to the stretching and bending vibrations of the hydroxyl groups from the hydrate water, respectively [36,37]. The absorption bands around 1100 cm−1 and 796 cm−1 are attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of Si–O–Si, respectively [38]. As shown in the APES–SiO2 FTIR graph, the bands at 2980 and 1345 cm−1 correspond to the stretching and bending vibrations of the methylene groups in siloxane, respectively [39]. This feature demonstrates that APES is indeed combined with SiO2. From the FTIR spectrum of SiO2@AF, the O–H stretching band disappears, which indicates that the–COOH grafted on PAA–AF is exhausted and the modified SiO2 is dehydrated during the hybridization process. However, the peak still observed at 1629 cm−1 is due to the stretching vibration of carbonyl in amide [40]. Another peak, which exists at 1547 cm−1, is ascribed to the N–H bending vibration of amide. This confirms that SiO2@AF was successfully prepared by the chemical bonding between APES–SiO2 and PAA–AF.
In order to further explore the combination of PAA–AF and APES–SiO2, XPS was applied to detect detailed any structural and compositional changes of the SiO2@AF samples. The XPS peaks fitted by the multipeak Lorentzian fitting program are presented in Figure 4. The Si2p core level spectrum of SO2 (Figure 4a) exhibits an obvious peak corresponding to O–Si–O at 103.5 eV. However, a new binding energy of the silicon atoms for APES–SiO2 (Figure 4b) is observed at 102.5 eV, which is assigned to the O–Si–C bond [41]. Figure 4c shows the N1s peak at 399.5 eV for APES–SiO2, which is attributed to nitrogen in amine. As displayed in Figure 4d, the N1s spectrum of SiO2@AF presents two new peaks at –NHOC– (400.7 eV) and –NH3+–OOC– (401.6 eV), which illustrates that SiO2 was combined with AF by covalent and ionic bonds [42]. The O1s peaks for PAA–AF observed at 529.7 eV, 531.0 eV and 534.2 eV in Figure 4e are ascribed to –OH, C–O, and C=O, respectively. Nevertheless, the –OH (529.7 eV) and C–O (531.0 eV) peaks disappear in the O1s curve of SiO2@AF (Figure 4f), which indicates that the –COOH grafted onto the AF was consumed during the preparation process. Another new peak at 532.3 eV, assigned to the oxygen atom (Si–O–Si), appears with the introduction of SiO2. All of these features confirm that the SiO2@AF hybrid materials were successfully obtained, which is consistent with the results of the FTIR analysis.
SEM was performed to investigate the surface morphology of AF and SiO2@AF (Figure 5). As shown in Figure 5a,b, the surface of the unmodified AF is smooth. Nevertheless, it is clearly seen in Figure 5c,d that a layer of modified SiO2 particles with different sizes and shapes is strongly linked to the surface of SiO2@AF. Furthermore, no aggregation of the SiO2 particles occurs on the AF surface due to the enhanced dispersibility by the APES grafting. A small amount of the AF is connected together by the SiO2 particles due to the excessive APES–SiO2 in the preparation of SiO2@AF. The combination of SiO2 on the AF surface obviously alters its morphology and highly enhances its surface roughness, which is beneficial to the interfacial interaction between SiO2@AF and the NR matrix.

3.2. Analysis of Immobilized Rubber Approaching the Filler Surface

For rubber composites, the chains immobilized on the fillers play an important role in enhancing their mechanical properties. In detail, the immobilized chains are able to promote the interfacial interactions, decrease the filler mobility and improve the compatibility between fillers and the matrix [43,44]. Thus, polymer chains immobilized on the filler, which indicate the interfacial interaction, are of great significance for precise evaluation in rubber composites. Figure 6a shows the DSC curves of the neat NR and SiO2+AF/NR, and the SiO2@AF/NR composites, and the typical results such as the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the heat capacity step (∆Cp) are listed in Table 2. It can obviously be seen that the Tg of SiO2@AF/NR is higher than that of SiO2+AF/NR, and the Tg of the neat NR is the minimum. These features illustrate that the introduction of SiO2@AF can improve network structures. Furthermore, the ∆Cp of SiO2@AF/NR is the lowest among the three samples, which represents the decreasing chain mobility owing to the strong interaction between NR and SiO2@AF. This result is consistent with the value of the Tg. According to Leterrier’s [45] and Liu’s [46] previous reports, the weight fraction of immobilized chains (χi) can be quantitatively determined using Equations (4) and (5).
Δ C p n = Δ C p 1 − φ
χ i = Δ C p 0 − Δ C p n Δ C p 0
where ∆Cp stands for the heat capacity step of the NR composites at Tg, ∆Cpn is the heat capacity step of the NR composites at Tg normalized to the rubber content, ∆Cp0 denotes the heat capacity step of pure NR at Tg and ϕ is the weight fraction of the fillers in the NR composites.
The obtained χi is displayed in Figure 6b. Evidently, the value of χi for SiO2@AF/NR is much higher than that for SiO2+AF/NR. As the amount of constrained rubber is not due to a diffuse hardening of the rubber, the amount of constrained rubber does not change before and after vulcanization [46]. The incremental fraction of the immobilized chains reflects a stronger interfacial interaction, because the fixed chains can play a role as a bridge between the fillers and the matrix. The possible reason for these results is the filler aspect. SiO2 particles loaded on the AF surface can avoid severe aggregation in NR matrix, and thus greatly increase the contact area. Ultimately, the mobility of the SiO2 particles combined on the AF surface is largely weakened, which can more highly confine the movement of the NR chains linked to the SiO2 particles. These results imply that SiO2@AF acts as a ‘rivet’ to immobilize large numbers of polymer chains on its surface, which greatly enhances the interfacial adhesion between SiO2@AF and NR.
To further evaluate the ‘rivet’ function of SiO2@AF in the rubber composites, SEM photographs of the fracture in the tensile rupture of the SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites are shown in Figure 7. From Figure 7a,b, the fibers on the failure surface of the SiO2@AF/NR composite exhibit a fracture state (the blue circles), and it can be seen that the fractured fibers are still tightly bound to the rubber matrix. Furthermore, many peeled microfibrils are observed on the failure surface of SiO2@AF/NR due to the weak shin/core structure of AF that results from wet spinning. For comparison, there are many holes in the failure surface of the SiO2+AF/NR composite (the red circles in Figure 7c), which are caused when the fiber pulls away from the NR matrix during the tensile process [47]. As shown in Figure 7d, a relatively complete fiber can be seen on the surfaces of the SiO2+AF/NR composites (the blue circles), which means that the interface between the AF and the NR matrix is weak, and that AF is pulled out. The results illustrate that SiO2@AF has a better interface adhesion ability with the rubber matrix than ordinary AF, and can bond with the NR matrix tightly without being pulled away.

3.3. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of the neat NR, SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites were investigated, as shown in Figure 8 (the sample with a filler content of 0 represents pure rubber) and Figure S3 (the stress–strain curve of the composites). Obviously, the tear strength, stress at 100% strain, stress at 300% strain and tensile strength of the NR composites are all promoted by the introduction of SiO2@AF and SiO2+AF (physically mixing SiO2 and the AF filler with the ratio of 48:52). However, SiO2@AF performs better in improving the mechanical properties of the rubber composites than SiO2+AF, especially in the case of a high filling content. As shown in Figure 8e, the elongation at the break of SiO2@AF/NR is higher than that of the SiO2+AF/NR composites. When the filling content is higher, the elongation at the break of SiO2+AF/NR decreases faster, and the gap between SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2+AF/NR is more obvious. The probable reason is that physically mixing SiO2 particles undergo aggregation due to their physicochemical surface properties [48], and numerous stress concentration regions that can propagate the cracks at lower stress appear. What is more, the interfacial adhesion between the smooth AF and the NR matrix is weak, which makes it easy for the AF to be pulled away during rubber composite stretching, and thus results in the increased stress concentration of the composites.
The tear strength, stress at 100% strain, stress at 300% strain and tensile strength of the 4 phr SiO2@AF/NR composite are dramatically increased by 97.8%, 167.4%, 144.8% and 89.3% that of the pure rubber, respectively. Furthermore, in contrast to the 4 phr SiO2+AF/NR composite, the tear strength, stress at 100% strain, stress at 300% strain and tensile strength for the 4 phr SiO2@AF/NR composite are increased by 26.1%, 16.1%, 18.3% and 29.1%, respectively. Obviously, SiO2@AF has a good reinforcing effect on rubber, especially in terms of the characteristics of the tear strength and the tensile strength of NR. This can be attributed to the ability of SiO2@AF to immobilize large numbers of rubber chains, which plays the role of a rivet in the tensile process of composites, and enhances the interface interaction of rubber. According to the performance of the mechanical properties of the rubber composites, combined with the DSC and SEM testing results, the potential reinforcing mechanism of SiO2@AF was analyzed. As shown in Figure 9, SiO2@AF can be regarded as a ‘rivet’ embedded into the NR matrix, and can immobilize a mass of polymer chains on its surfaces, which highly promotes the interfacial interaction between NR and SiO2@AF, and efficiently delivers external stress. There are two situations when SiO2 and AF are physically incorporated into the NR matrix: (1) when SiO2 is filled with a high filling content, agglomeration will appear in the matrix; and (2) AF forms less immobilized chains with the rubber matrix, which are easily pulled out from the matrix. It can be reasonably concluded that the greater the fraction of the immobilized chains, the higher the mechanical properties of the composites; SiO2@AF hybrid materials with the ‘rivet’ effect have greater superiority in immobilizing the polymer chains and enhancing the mechanical properties.

3.4. Cutting Resistance

The influence of SiO2@AF on the cutting resistance of the NR composites was evaluated by a cut tester. Cutting resistance is an important performance index of engineering truck tires, which is usually characterized by the mass loss of composite materials before and after the experiment (Figure S4). As shown in Figure 10, the weight loss of the pure NR, SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites is gradually increased with incremental cutting times. In addition, the weight loss of the SiO2@AF/NR composite is clearly lower than that of the neat NR and the SiO2+AF/NR composite after an identical cutting time. For example, a weight loss of 19.14% is reached for the SiO2@AF/NR composite at a cutting time of 20 min, which is relatively lower than the 22.43% for the SiO2+AF/NR composite and the 24.73% for the neat NR. These features demonstrate that the introduction of SiO2@AF can preferably promote the cutting resistance of NR, in comparison to untreated AF and SiO2. SiO2@AF with higher surface roughness can play a role as a ‘rivet’ to immobilize more polymer chains on the surface. The interfacial interaction between SiO2@AF and the NR matrix is significantly enhanced, which results in the difficult exfoliation of the NR chains from the filler. Hence, similarly to the mechanical properties, the cutting resistance of the NR composite is greatly increased with the introduction of SiO2@AF.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, SiO2@AF hybrid materials were successfully prepared by chemically bonding APES–SiO2 onto the surface of PAA–AF, with a SiO2 macroparticle mass of 48 wt%. With the incorporation of SiO2@AF into the rubber matrix, the immobilized chain fraction of the SiO2@AF/NR composite was 14.7 wt%, which was much higher than that of the SiO2+AF/NR composite. The interfacial interaction between the filler and the matrix was improved with incremental weight fractions of the immobilized chains. Hence, hierarchical SiO2@AF materials with the ‘rivet’ effect have greater superiority in enhancing the mechanical properties of natural rubber. Compared to pure NR, the tear strength, stress at 100% strain, stress at 300% strain and tensile strength of the SiO2@AF/NR composite were dramatically increased by 97.8%, 167.4%, 144.8% and 89.3%, respectively. Moreover, the cutting resistance of the SiO2+AF/NR composite was promoted to a greater extent, due to the difficult exfoliation of the NR chains from the SiO2@AF filler. Therefore, hierarchical SiO2@AF materials have great potential for the application of fabricating high-performance rubber composites.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/11/2665/s1. Figure S1: Tensile strength of AF and XRD patterns of AF with different UV irradiation times; Figure S2: AFM images of AF with different UV irradiation times; Figure S3: The stress–strain curve of the SiO2@AF/NR and SiO2+AF/NR; Figure S4: Cutting resistance test sample picture and the working mechanism of the cutting tester.

Author Contributions

Funding Acquisition, Y.X.; Methodology, Q.Z. and Y.X.; Software, Y.L.; Validation, Q.Z.; Formal Analysis, Q.Z. and Y.L.; Investigation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Y.L.; Writing—Review and Editing, Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51663003 and the Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province, grant number [2019] 2166.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhan, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, K.; Li, Y.; Meng, Y.; Yan, N.; Wei, W.; Peng, F.; Xia, H. Fabrication of a flexible electromagnetic interference shielding Fe3O4@reduced graphene oxide/natural rubber composite with segregated network. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 344, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Das, A.; Stockelhuber, K.W.; Jurk, R.; Saphiannikova, M.; Fritzsche, J.; Lorenz, H.; Kluppel, M.; Heinrich, G. Modified and unmodified multiwalled carbon nanotubes in high performance solution-styrene–butadiene and butadiene rubber blends. Polymer 2008, 49, 5276–5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rajan, V.V.; Dierkes, W.K.; Joseph, R.; Noordermeer, J.W.M. Science and technology of rubber reclamation with special attention to NR-based waste latex products. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 811–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, J.; Huang, G.; Li, H.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, J. Enhanced mechanical and gas barrier properties of rubber nanocomposites with surface functionalized graphene oxide at low content. Polymer 2013, 54, 1930–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, M.; Xiong, Y.; Xue, B.; Zhang, Q.; Wan, Q.; Zhao, H. Multi-layer graphene oxide synergistically modified by two coupling agents and its application in reinforced natural rubber composites. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 29847–29854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Raji Vijay, V.; Anitha, A.M.; Ravindranatha Menon, A.R. Studies on blends of natural rubber and butadiene rubber containing silica-organomodified kaolin hybrid filler systems. Polymer 2016, 89, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, H.; Klüppel, M.; Schneider, H. Study of filled SBR elastomers using NMR and mechanical measurements. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 8000–8009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gerspacher, M.; O"Farrell, C.P.; Nikiel, L.; Yang, H.; Méhauté, F. High Frequency Viscoelasticity of Carbon Black Filled Compounds. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1996, 69, 786–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kulik, V.M.; Boiko, A.; Bardakhanov, S.; Chun, H.; Lee, I. Viscoelastic properties of silicone rubber with admixture of SiO2 nanoparticles. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 2011, 528, 5729–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Meier, J.G.; Fritzsche, J.; Guy, L.; Bomal, Y.; Klüppel, M. Relaxation dynamics of hydration water at activated silica interfaces in high-performance elastomer composites. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 2127–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Jia, Z.; Guo, X.; Zhong, B.; Chen, Y.; Luo, Y.; Jia, D. Functionalized HNTs nanocluster vulcanized natural rubber with high filler-rubber interaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, J.; Yuan, L.; Guan, Q.; Liang, G.; Gu, A. A novel strategy of fabricating high performance UV-resistant aramid fibers with simultaneously improved surface activity, thermal and mechanical properties through building polydopamine and graphene oxide bi-layer coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 310, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pittayavinai, P.; Thanawan, S.; Amornsakchai, T. Comparative study of natural rubber and acrylonitrile rubber reinforced with aligned short aramid fiber. Polym. Test. 2017, 64, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yin, L.; Zhou, Z.; Luo, Z. Reinforcing effect of aramid fibers on fatigue behavior of SBR/aramid fiber composites. Polym. Test. 2019, 80, 106092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Surajarusarn, B.; Hajjar-Garreau, S.; Schrodj, G.; Mougin, K.; Amornsakchai, T. Comparative study of pineapple leaf microfiber and aramid fiber reinforced natural rubbers using dynamic mechanical analysis. Polym. Test. 2020, 82, 106289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, L.; Shi, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, W.; Tian, M.; Ning, N.; Zhang, L. Highly efficient mussel-like inspired modification of aramid fibers by UV-accelerated catechol/polyamine deposition followed chemical grafting for high-performance polymer composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 314, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, L.; Yuan, L.; Guan, Q.; Gu, A.; Liang, G. Building unique surface structure on aramid fibers through a green layer-by-layer self-assembly technique to develop new high performance fibers with greatly improved surface activity, thermal resistance, mechanical properties and UV resistance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 411, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, Z.; Li, B.; Huang, J.; Chen, T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, X. Covalent modification of Aramid fibers’ surface via direct fluorination to enhance composite interfacial properties. Mater. Design 2016, 106, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, C.X.; Du, M.; Lv, J.C.; Zhou, Q.Q.; Ren, Y.; Liu, C.L.; Gao, D.W.; Jin, L.M. Surface modification of aramid fiber by plasma induced vapor phase graft polymerization of acrylic acid. I. Influence of plasma conditions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 349, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xing, L.X.; Li, L.; Huang, Y.D.; Jiang, D.W.; Jiang, B.; He, J.M. Enhanced interfacial properties of domestic aramid fiber-12 via high energy gamma ray irradiation. Compos. Part B-Eng. 2015, 69, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vilay, V.; Mariatti, M.; Mat Taib, R.; Todo, M. Effect of fiber surface treatment and fiber loading on the properties of bagasse fiber–reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, C.; Dai, Y.; Meng, C.; Luo, L.; Liu, X. Aramid fiber with excellent interfacial properties suitable for resin composite in a wide polarity range. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 347, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cheng, Z.; Wu, P.; Li, B.; Chen, T.; Liu, Y.; Ren, M.; Wang, Z.; Lai, W.; Wang, X.; Liu, X. Surface chain cleavage behavior of PBIA fiber induced by direct fluorination. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 384, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Z.M.; Liu, B.H.; Kong, H.J.; Yu, M.H.; Qin, M.L.; Teng, C.Q. Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly Strategy for Surface Modification of Aramid Fibers to Enhance Interfacial Adhesion to Epoxy Resin. Polymers. 2018, 10, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wei, B.; Cao, H.L.; Song, S.H. Surface modification and characterization of basalt fibers with hybrid sizing. Compos. Part A 2011, 42, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ni, Q.; Fu, Y.; Fu, X. Surface modification and characterization of aramid fibers with hybrid coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 321, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, S.; Gu, A.; Xue, J.; Liang, G.; Yuan, L. The influence of the short-term ultraviolet radiation on the structure and properties of poly(p-phenylene terephthalaramide) fibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 265, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Luo, J.; Zhang, M.; Nie, J.; Liu, G.; Tan, J.; Yang, B.; Song, S.; Zhao, J. A deep insight into the structure and performance evolution of aramid nanofiber films induced by UV irradiation. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 167, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Hao, X.; Wang, S.; Feng, X.; Guo, Y. Effects of solar UV irradiation on the tensile properties and structure of PPTA fiber. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 2761–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, C.; Tang, Z.; Guo, B.; Zhang, L. Significantly improved rubber-silica interface via subtly controlling surface chemistry of silica. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 156, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dai, J.; Xiong, Y.; Cui, L.; Li, X.; Wang, B.; Wu, S. Study on modification of aramid fiber by UV irradiation. J. Synth. Cryst. 2016, 45, 2705–2710. [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Hua, W.; Zhang, A.; Bao, J. Light-weight silver plating foam and carbon nanotube hybridized epoxy composite foams with exceptional conductivity and electromagnetic shielding property. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2016, 8, 24131–24142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, L.; Zhang, J.; Teng, C. Covalent functionalization of aramid fibers with zinc oxide nano-interphase for improved UV resistance and interfacial strength in composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2020, 188, 107996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Morent, R.; Geyter, N.D.; Trentesaux, M.; Gengembre, L.; Dubruel, P.; Leys, C.; Payen, E. Stability study of polyacrylic acid films plasma-polymerized on polypropylene substrates at medium pressure. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dai, Y.; Meng, C.; Tang, S.; Qin, J.; Liu, X. Construction of dendritic structure by nano-SiO2 derivate grafted with hyperbranched polyamide in aramid fiber to simultaneously improve its mechanical and compressive properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 119, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mitic, Z.; Cakic, M.; Nikolic, G.M.; Nikolic, R.; Nikolic, G.S.; Pavlovic, R.; Santaniello, E. Synthesis, physicochemical and spectroscopic characterization of copper (II)-polysaccharide pullulan complexes by UV–vis, ATR-FTIR, and EPR. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xue, B.; Ji, L.; Deng, J.; Zhang, J. In situ FTIR spectroscopy study on the rapid dissolution process of modified poly(vinyl alcohol). J. Polym. Res. 2016, 23, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Schwieger, W. Vibrational spectroscopic studies of layered silicates. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xue, B.; Bao, J.; Zhang, J. Ultrafine fly ash as a reinforcing filler in poly(lactic acid) matrix. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiao, D.; Zhang, H.; Wirth, M. Chemical modification of the surface of poly(dimethylsiloxane) by atom-transfer radical polymerization of acrylamide. Langmuir 2002, 18, 9971–9976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lin, Y.; Liu, S.; Peng, J.; Liu, L. The filler–rubber interface and reinforcement in styrene butadiene rubber composites with graphene/silica hybrids: A quantitative correlation with the constrained region. Compos. Part A 2016, 86, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, H.; Du, Z. Fabrication of silica nanoparticles on the surface of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2011, 49, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kripotou, S.; Pissis, P.; Savelyev, Y.V.; Robota, L.P.; Travinskaya, T.V. Polymer dynamics in polyurethane/clay nanocomposites studied by dielectric and thermal techniques. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys. 2010, 49, 86–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fragiadakis, D.; Pissis, P.; Bokobza, L. Glass transition and molecular dynamics in poly (dimethylsiloxane)/silica nanocomposites. Polymer 2005, 46, 6001–6008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ruggerone, R.; Geiser, V.; Vacche, S.D.; Leterrier, Y.; Manson, J. Immobilized polymer fraction in hyperbranched polymer/silica nanocomposites suspensions. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 10490–10497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Tadiello, L.; D’Arienzo, M.; Di Credico, B.; Hanel, T.; Matejka, L.; Mauri, M. Filler-rubber interface in styrene butadiene nanocomposites with anisotropic silica particles: Morphology and dynamic properties. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 4022–4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hao, M.Y.; Wu, H.W.; Qiu, F.; Wang, X.W. Interface Bond Improvement of Sisal Fibre Reinforced Polylactide Composites with Added Epoxy Oligomer. Materials 2018, 11, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Xu, T.; Jia, Z.; Li, J.; Luo, Y.; Jia, D.; Peng, Z. Study on the dispersion of carbon black/silica in SBR/BR composites and its properties by adding epoxidized natural rubber as a compatilizer. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 02665 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation of the aramid fiber decorated with silica (SiO2@AF) hybrid materials and the natural rubber (NR) composites. AF, aramid fiber; SiO2, silica; DCC, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; DMAP, 4-dimethylaminopyridine; PAA–AF, AF modified with polyacrylic acid; APES–SiO2, SiO2 modified by 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the preparation of the aramid fiber decorated with silica (SiO2@AF) hybrid materials and the natural rubber (NR) composites. AF, aramid fiber; SiO2, silica; DCC, dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; DMAP, 4-dimethylaminopyridine; PAA–AF, AF modified with polyacrylic acid; APES–SiO2, SiO2 modified by 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane.
Materials 13 02665 g001
Materials 13 02665 g002 550
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of SiO2, APES–SiO2, AF and PAA–AF (a). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of AF, PAA–AF, SiO2, APES–SiO2 and SiO2@AF (b).
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of SiO2, APES–SiO2, AF and PAA–AF (a). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of AF, PAA–AF, SiO2, APES–SiO2 and SiO2@AF (b).
Materials 13 02665 g002
Materials 13 02665 g003 550
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of AF (a) and PAA–AF (b).
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of AF (a) and PAA–AF (b).
Materials 13 02665 g003
Materials 13 02665 g004 550
Figure 4. X–ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) survey curves of (a) Si2p of SiO2, (b) Si2p of APES–SiO2, (c) N1s of APES–SiO2, (d) N1s of SiO2@AF, (e) O1s of PAA–AF and (f) O1s of SiO2@AF.
Figure 4. X–ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) survey curves of (a) Si2p of SiO2, (b) Si2p of APES–SiO2, (c) N1s of APES–SiO2, (d) N1s of SiO2@AF, (e) O1s of PAA–AF and (f) O1s of SiO2@AF.
Materials 13 02665 g004
Materials 13 02665 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of (a,b) neat AF and (c,d) SiO2@AF.
Figure 5. SEM images of (a,b) neat AF and (c,d) SiO2@AF.
Materials 13 02665 g005
Materials 13 02665 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) DSC curves of the neat NR and the SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites. (b) Weight fraction of the immobilized NR chains in the composites.
Figure 6. (a) DSC curves of the neat NR and the SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites. (b) Weight fraction of the immobilized NR chains in the composites.
Materials 13 02665 g006
Materials 13 02665 g007 550
Figure 7. Morphology of the SiO2@AF/NR (a,b) and SiO2+AF/NR (c,d) composites.
Figure 7. Morphology of the SiO2@AF/NR (a,b) and SiO2+AF/NR (c,d) composites.
Materials 13 02665 g007
Materials 13 02665 g008 550
Figure 8. Tear strength (a), stress at 300% strain (b), stress at 100% strain (c), tensile strength (d) and elongation at break (e) of the neat NR and the SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites with different filler contents.
Figure 8. Tear strength (a), stress at 300% strain (b), stress at 100% strain (c), tensile strength (d) and elongation at break (e) of the neat NR and the SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites with different filler contents.
Materials 13 02665 g008
Materials 13 02665 g009 550
Figure 9. Molecular orientation under tensile strain of the pure NR and the SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites.
Figure 9. Molecular orientation under tensile strain of the pure NR and the SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites.
Materials 13 02665 g009
Materials 13 02665 g010 550
Figure 10. Weight loss versus cutting time for neat NR, SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites.
Figure 10. Weight loss versus cutting time for neat NR, SiO2+AF/NR and SiO2@AF/NR composites.
Materials 13 02665 g010
Table
Table 1. Curing formula of the NR composites.
Table 1. Curing formula of the NR composites.
IngredientPhr *
NR100
SiO2@AF or SiO2+AF1–4
Zinc oxide (ZnO)5
Stearic acid (SA)4
Accelerator diphenylhydrazine (D)0.5
Tetramethylthiuramdisulfide (TMTD)0.32
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole (M)2.21
2,2′-dibenzothiazoledisulfde (DM)1.96
Antioxidant N-isopropyl-N′-phenyl-4-phenylenediamin (4010NA)1.5
Sulphur1.71
* Phr: parts per hundred of natural rubber by weight; NR composites at the filler content of 4 phr are the main research objects. Without special instructions, SiO2@AF/NR and SiO2+AF/NR represent 4 phr SiO2@AF/NR and 4 phr SiO2+AF/NR, respectively.
Table
Table 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results for the glass transition of the neat NR and the NR composites.
Table 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results for the glass transition of the neat NR and the NR composites.
Sampleϕ (wt%)Tg (K)ΔCp (J/gK)ΔCpn (J/gK)
Neat NR0207.610.5030.503
AF+SiO2/NR3.300216.340.4440.459
SiO2@AF/NR3.300218.000.4090.429

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Q. Rivet-Inspired Modification of Aramid Fiber by Decorating with Silica Particles to Enhance the Interfacial Interaction and Mechanical Properties of Rubber Composites. Materials 2020, 13, 2665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112665

AMA Style

Li Y, Xiong Y, Zhang Q. Rivet-Inspired Modification of Aramid Fiber by Decorating with Silica Particles to Enhance the Interfacial Interaction and Mechanical Properties of Rubber Composites. Materials. 2020; 13(11):2665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yihang, Yuzhu Xiong, and Qingpo Zhang. 2020. "Rivet-Inspired Modification of Aramid Fiber by Decorating with Silica Particles to Enhance the Interfacial Interaction and Mechanical Properties of Rubber Composites" Materials 13, no. 11: 2665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop