Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Grinding Preparation and Characterization of TiO2-Coated Wollastonite Composite Pigments
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Atmospheric Corrosion on the Mechanical Properties of SAE 1020 Structural Steel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/ma11040592
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alloying and Hardness of Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide Based Alloys

by
Panos Tsakiropoulos
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
Materials 2018, 11(4), 592; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040592
Submission received: 22 March 2018 / Revised: 4 April 2018 / Accepted: 5 April 2018 / Published: 11 April 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In Nb-silicide based alloys, eutectics can form that contain the Nbss and Nb5Si3 phases. The Nb5Si3 can be rich or poor in Ti, the Nb can be substituted with other transition and refractory metals, and the Si can be substituted with simple metal and metalloid elements. For the production of directionally solidified in situ composites of multi-element Nb-silicide based alloys, data about eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 is essential. In this paper, the alloying behaviour of eutectics observed in Nb-silicide based alloys was studied using the parameters ΔHmix, ΔSmix, VEC (valence electron concentration), δ (related to atomic size), Δχ (related to electronegativity), and Ω (= Tm ΔSmix/|ΔHmix|). The values of these parameters were in the ranges −41.9 < ΔHmix <−25.5 kJ/mol, 4.7 < ΔSmix < 15 J/molK, 4.33 < VEC < 4.89, 6.23 < δ < 9.44, 0.38 < Ω < 1.35, and 0.118 < Δχ < 0.248, with a gap in Δχ values between 0.164 and 0.181. Correlations between ΔSmix, Ω, ΔSmix, and VEC were found for all of the eutectics. The correlation between ΔHmix and δ for the eutectics was the same as that of the Nbss, with more negative ΔHmix for the former. The δ versus Δχ map separated the Ti-rich eutectics from the Ti-poor eutectics, with a gap in Δχ values between 0.164 and 0.181, which is within the Δχ gap of the Nbss. Eutectics were separated according to alloying additions in the Δχ versus VEC, Δχ versus <Si>, δ versus <Si>, and VEC versus <Si> maps, where <Si> = Al + Ge + Si + Sn. Convergence of data in maps occurred at δ ≈ 9.25, VEC ≈ 4.35, Δχ in the range ≈ 0.155 to 0.162, and <Si> in the range ≈ 21.6 at.% to ≈ 24.3 at.%. The convergence of data also indicated that the minimum concentration of Ti and maximum concentrations of Al and Si in the eutectic were about 8.7 at.% Ti, 6.3 at.% Al, and 21.6 at.% Si, respectively, and that the minimum concentration of Si in the eutectic was in the range 8 < Si < 10 at.%.

1. Introduction

Nb-silicide based alloys (also known as Nb-silicide in situ composites) are multi-element high temperature alloys. They can offer a balance of properties, and meet property goals to enable future aero engines to comply with new environmental and performance targets [1]. Alloying additions that have been reported in Nb-silicide based alloys include Al, B, Cr, Fe, Ga, Ge, Hf, Ho, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, Y or Zr. The desirable phases in these Nb-Si based alloys are the bcc Nb solid solution (Nbss) and tetragonal Nb5Si3 silicide. Other phases also can be present, such as for example C14-NbCr2 Laves and A15-Nb3X intermetallic phases.
In current aero engines, columnar grained and single crystal blades that were manufactured from Ni-based superalloys are used. Eutectic alloys with unusual highly anisotropic microstructures and properties can be manufactured. The properties of directionally solidified (DS) eutectic alloys depend on the regularity and directionality of the microstructure. DS in situ composites can be used at high stress levels at high homologous temperatures, and are capable of meeting the needs of different applications. The evaluation of DS eutectic Nb-silicide in situ composites is desirable.
In situ composites can be produced via liquid-to-solid and solid-to-solid phase transformations. In binary systems with eutectic and eutectoid reactions, in situ composites of the binary eutectics and eutectoids have been studied. The directional solidification of alloys of eutectic composition can produce in situ composites with one or more high strength phases (which are often referred to as reinforcing phases) in a metal matrix. The interface between the matrix and the reinforcing phase is formed at close to equilibrium conditions, and is stable. Microstructures can be stable at high homologous temperatures. Eutectics have been grown with ductile metal matrices and reinforcing whiskers with strengths in excess of 7 GPa [2].
Aligned composites are desirable for high-temperature applications. Those that are grown from the melt have inherent advantages compared with other types of aligned composites, because adequate bonding and low reactivity between the phases is achieved, and there are no lay-up problems or fibre matrix interactions during fabrication.
Aligned in situ composites of near eutectic composition can be fabricated. In binary alloys of compositions well removed from the eutectic, in situ composites have been grown under high G/R ratios, where G is the temperature gradient, and R is the growth rate [3,4]. Multi-component alloys can be grown with a plane front and an aligned composite structure, provided that the interface kinetics do not pose too great a barrier to growth, the G/R ratio is sufficiently high, and the convection is sufficiently low.
DS materials are sensitive to changes in R, G, and composition. Reactions with the mould and core(s) may be a serious problem at low R values. Elements (impurities) of low concentration Co may influence (i) the stability and (ii) the properties of the DS structure. The effects of such elements may be large (i) because they can cause a macroscopically planar S/L interface to become morphologically unstable. A degeneration of an S/L interface to a non-planar configuration is more pronounced at high R values that produce finer and stronger structures, or low G values. Two ratios, which depend on the processing and alloy parameters, are important. The first is the ratio G/(RCo), which must be greater than some critical value to produce a controlled DS eutectic. The second is the ratio (RΔTo/D), where ΔTo is the freezing range of the alloy, and D is the diffusivity in the melt. For G < (RΔTo/D), the S/L interface becomes morphologically unstable. The value of ΔTo depends on composition. ΔTo is small when the alloy has the eutectic composition and when the impurity concentration Co is low. Off-eutectic alloys have larger ΔTo values, and impurities also increase ΔTo. The effects of growth rate fluctuations are minimized for an alloy of eutectic composition. In off-eutectic alloy compositions, growth rate fluctuations cause changes in volume fractions of phases. If the fluctuation in growth rate is large enough, the volume fraction of one phase may go to zero. Thus, knowledge about the composition of the eutectic and element(s) with low concentration (impurities) is essential for regular DS composites. In other words, composites without irregularities in the DS structure, such as change(s) in the cross-section during DS casting, can also change R and G, and thus cause the breakdown of the regular structure.
Research in the early 1970s on titanium matrix eutectics, where Ti was reinforced with an intermetallic phase, reported that reinforcement with 31 vol % Ti5Si3 fibres gave a considerable improvement of the Young’s modulus, compressive yield strength, and creep strength compared with existing commercial alloys [5,6].
The development of Nb-silicide based alloys has concentrated almost exclusively on cast and heat-treated alloys. Powder metallurgy (PM) alloys also have been made [7]. The non-consumable electrode arc melting of small elemental charges (0.01 kg to 0.6 kg) of pure elements in water cooled copper crucibles has been the preferred processing route for the large majority of cast alloys, owing to the limited available facilities and resources for alloy making and processing worldwide.
In the Nb–Si binary phase diagram [8], there are eutectic and eutectoid reactions (see below in this section), which, in principle, make it possible to produce in situ Nb–Si composites via liquid-to-solid and solid-to-solid phase transformations. Research has sought to utilize these reactions for the development of Nb-silicide based alloys [9]. In the 1990s, it was demonstrated that DS in situ Nb–Si composites can be grown [1,9]. DS Nb-silicide based alloys have been produced using (i) the Bridgman method with liquid metal cooling [10,11,12,13], (ii) homemade DS facilities [14,15,16], and (iii) optical floating zone (OFZ) processing [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Typical microstructures of DS Nb-silicide based alloys produced using (i) to (iii) are shown in [10,11,12,13,14,15,17,21].
The fabrication of aligned Nbss and Nb5Si3 in situ composites of multi-element Nb-silicide based alloys is highly desirable. Aligned microstructures with Nbss and Nb5Si3 could be produced using the directional solidification of eutectics that contain these phases. For the solidification processing of such in situ eutectic composites, data about the eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 that can form in Nb-silicide based alloys is required. The following discussion will highlight that such data is currently either non-available or severely limited.
Why it is possible to fabricate in situ composites of Nb-silicide based alloys? Why is there interest in eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3? To answer these questions, one needs to revisit what is known about eutectic(s) and eutectoid reactions in the Nb–Si binary system. In the Nb-rich part of the equilibrium Nb–Si binary phase diagram, the eutectic and eutectoid reactions are L → Nbss + Nb3Si (stable eutectic), and Nb3Si → Nbss + αNb5Si3, respectively [8]. The latter is very sluggish. In binary Nb–Si alloys, the former reaction can be suppressed under rapid solidification conditions, and replaced by the metastable eutectic reaction L → Nbss + βNb5Si3 [23,24,25]. The phase diagram used in [23] to show the metastable extension of the Nb5Si3 liquidus to form the metastable eutectic indicated stable eutectic for a liquid composition at Si = 18.7 at.%, and a metastable eutectic at Si ≈ 20 at.%. For the stable eutectic in the binary phase diagram, the reported values of the Si concentration of the liquid are in the range 15.3 at.% to 18.7 at.% [26,27]; in other words there is disagreement about the composition of the stable eutectic. There is also disagreement about the temperature of the eutectoid reaction for which the high and low temperatures of 2043 K and 1939 K, respectively, have been reported [28,29]. The concentration of Si in the metastable eutectic estimated from the metastable extension of the Nb5Si3 liquidus depends on the Nb–Si binary phase diagram that is used.
The tetragonal Nb5Si3 silicide is preferred for Nb-silicide based alloys owing to its superior properties compared with Nb3Si and hexagonal γNb5Si3. The two phase Nb + αNb5Si3 area in the Nb–Si binary has a composition range from 0.6 at.%. to 37.5 at.%. This gives flexibility to form Nb + Nb5Si3 composites that are stable above the envisaged surface temperature of the new alloys in service (Tservice ≤ 1673 K) and with different volume fractions of the phases.
Nb-silicide based alloys have been developed that have met the toughness or creep property goals or significantly closed the gap with the oxidation property goal. These are multi-element Nb–Si-based alloys. Some of the alloying additions provide solid solution strengthening to the Nbss (for example, Mo, Ta, Ti, and W). Meanwhile, other elements suppress pest oxidation and improve oxidation at high temperatures (for example, Al, B, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Sn, and Ti); other elements suppress the stable eutectic and replace it with the metastable one (for example, Al, Mo, Sn, Ta, and W), and other elements stabilise tetragonal Nb5Si3 (for example, Al, Cr, Mo, Ta, and W) and improve creep (Mo, Ta, and W). Phase diagrams provide data about eutectic and eutectoid reactions. However, for the design and development of Nb-silicide based alloys, such data is limited. For example, there are no phase diagrams for the Nb-Si-Ta, Nb-Si-Y ternary systems [30], no or limited data about the liquidus projections of the Nb-Si-Al, Nb-Si-Hf, Nb-Si-Mo, Nb-Si-V, Nb-Si-W, Nb-Si-Zr ternary systems [30], and there are disagreements about the Nb-Ti-Si and Nb-Cr-Si liquidus projections [31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
Recently, the alloying of Nbss and tetragonal Nb5Si3 was reported in [38,39]. The study of the solid solution [38] used the parameters ΔHmix (enthalpy of mixing), ΔSmix (entropy of mixing (VEC (valence electron concentration), δ (parameter related to atomic size), Δχ (parameter related to electronegativity) and Ω = Tm ΔSmix/|ΔHmix|. The capital letter Q was used instead of Ω for the ratio TmΔSmix/|ΔHmix|in [38] to avoid confusion with the term Ωij in the definition of ΔHmix. The above parameters are used in the study of the so-called high entropy alloys. References for publications on high entropy alloys are given in [38]. In [38], the alloying behaviour of the solid solution was described well by the parameters δ, Δχ, and VEC. The study of tetragonal Nb5Si3 [39] also showed that the parameters Δχ and VEC described its alloying behaviour, and that the changes of the hardness of the alloyed Nb5Si3 were related to the VEC parameter.
What can we learn about the Si concentration of eutectics that contain Nbss and Nb5Si3 from the available data for Nb-silicide based alloys? For these eutectics, would it be possible to deduce (i) the maximum and minimum concentrations of Si in the eutectic, (ii) the total concentration of simple metal and metalloid elements in the eutectic, (iii) the minimum and maximum concentrations of other alloying additions in the eutectic (see the discussion about Co and ΔTo earlier in this section), (iv) the dependence of the concentration of refractory metals on the Si concentration in the eutectic, and (v) whether the hardness of the eutectics is related to the VEC parameter?
The motivation for the research presented in this paper was to answer the above questions. The structure of the paper is as follows. First, the values of the aforementioned parameters will be given for eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3, and compared with data for Nb-silicide based alloys and their solid solutions. Then, the relationships between them will be discussed. The focus will then be on relationships between parameters, and the concentration of simple and metalloid elements in the eutectic. Next, the relationships between the concentrations of solute additions and the Si concentration in the eutectic will be discussed. Finally, the hardness of the eutectics will be considered.

2. Methodology

The available experimental data for the eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys from [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56] was used to seek out relationships between the parameters ΔHmix, ΔSmix, VEC, δ, Δχ, and Ω, and between these parameters and the hardness of eutectics. The actual compositions of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 were the essential requirement in order to calculate the parameters of the eutectic. The equations that were used to calculate the parameters Hmix, Smix, VEC, δ, Δχ and Ω were given in [38]. The data for the properties of elements was from the same sources as in [38].
All of the eutectics studied in this paper were observed in the cast microstructures of Nb-silicide based alloys that had been prepared using arc melting with non-consumable tungsten electrodes in an inert atmosphere with water-cooled copper crucibles. The phases in the cast microstructures of the alloys were identified using XRD (Siemens D5000, Hiltonbrooks Ltd., Crewe, UK) and JCPDS data (International Centre for Diffraction Data), and quantitative microanalysis [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. For the latter, electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) was used in a JEOL 8600 EPMA (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with energy-dispersive and wavelength-dispersive spectrometers and the Oxford Link INCA software (Oxford Instruments plc, Abingdon, UK). Carefully polished standards of high purity of Nb, Si, and the other alloying element additions (Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, Y, and Zr) were used. At least 10 analyses were performed for each eutectic area in an alloy. Each specimen had been carefully polished, and was not etched. The hardness of eutectics was measured using a CV-430 AAT automatic hardness-testing machine. The load that was used was 10 kg, and was applied for 20 seconds. The indentations were made only on the eutectic areas, and covered a larger area relative to inter-lamellar spacing. At least 10 measurements were taken for each phase. The hardness measurements were taken from eutectics with similar inter-lamellar spacing in the order of micrometres. No new experimental data were created during the course of this study.
Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 have been observed in Nb-silicide based alloys with/out Ti addition, and with simple metal and metalloid element additions and other transition and refractory metal additions. The alloys belong in different alloy systems. Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 have been reported in ternary Nb-Si-X (X = Ga, Ge, Mo, Sn) [43,45,57,58]; quaternary Nb-Si-Hf-X (X = Al, Cr, Sn, W) [40,42,49], Nb-Si-Mo-X (X = Al, W) [21,42], Nb-Si-Ge-X (X = Al, Cr) [47,48], Nb-Ti-Si-X (X = Al, Ge, Sn) [46,59]; quinary Nb-Si-Hf-Sn-Al [49], Nb-Si-Hf-Mo-Ta [41], Nb-Ti-Si-Al-Cr [59], Nb-Ti-Si-Sn-X (X = Al, Cr, Fe, Hf) [44,51,52], Nb-Ti-Si-Al-X (X = Ge, Hf) [48], and Nb-Ti-Si-Mo-W [41,42] alloys; and higher order alloys, such as for example Nb-Ti-Si-Al-Cr-X (X = Ge, Hf, Sn, Ta) [10,12,13,15,19,50,53,60], Nb-Ti-Si-Hf-Mo-W [61], Nb-Ti-Si-W-Ge-Sn-X (X = Mo, Ta) [50,53], Nb-Ti-Si-Al-Cr-Mo-W-Ge-Sn [50,53], Nb-Ti-Si-Al-Cr-Ge-Y [55], Nb-Ti-Si-Al-Cr-Hf-B-Y [14,16], and Nb-Ti-Si-Al-Cr-Hf-Ta-Ho [20] alloys. Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 have been observed in boron containing Nb-silicide based alloys, but there is no data for the chemical composition of such eutectics (see discussion of Figures 6 and 13 in the next section).
Both Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys can be alloyed; for example, Nb-32.4Ti-1.4Si-5.8Cr-2.5Al-2.8Fe-4.9Sn-1.3Hf and Nb-34.1Si-20.7Ti-9.6Hf-3.7Al-1.8V-0.4Cr-0.4Sn are actual average chemical compositions (at.%) respectively of a solid solution and a Nb5Si3 silicide in two different Nb-silicide based alloys. Some of the alloying additions partition preferably to one of these phases (for example, Sn partitions to the Nbss [43,44] and Ge partitions to the Nb5Si3 [45,46,47,48]) and other elements partition to both phases (for example, Hf and Ti). Depending on alloying additions, other phases also can form, for example A15-Nb3X (X = Al, Ge, Sn, Si) and C14-NbCr2 Laves. These phases also are alloyed; for example, Nb-25.4Ti-2.3Cr-0.7Fe-0.3Hf-10.9Sn-5.1Si-2.4Al [52] and Nb-6.6Ti-6.9Ta-4.4W-1.1Hf-44.2Cr-8.7Si-6Al-1Ge-0.6Sn [50] are actual average chemical compositions (at.%) respectively of an A15 and a Laves phase in two different Nb-silicide based alloys.
The A15 phases are observed next to the Nbss, and the Laves phases form in the last to solidify Cr-rich melt in between Nbss and Nb5Si3 dendrites [59,60]. Under backscatter electron (BSE) imaging conditions, the contrasts of Nbss and A15-Nb3X phase are similar. Ti-rich areas can form in Nbss and Nb5Si3. Nbss/Nb5Si3 interfaces also can be Ti-rich. In Hf and Ti-containing alloys, the increase of the concentration of Ti in Nbss and/or Nb5Si3 is accompanied by an increase of the concentration of Hf. In alloys with Mo and W additions, the partitioning of these elements and Ti in the Nbss also creates problems with contrast, as Mo and W “do not like Ti in the Nbss”, meaning that as the concentrations of Mo and W increase, that of Ti decreases. The variations in contrast that arise from the partitioning of solutes and the fine microstructures of the eutectics sometimes made it very difficult to confirm whether a binary Nbss + Nb5Si3 or a ternary eutectic between Nbss and Nb5Si3 and A15-Nb3X or C14-NbCr2 Laves had formed in alloys with three or more phases. In the great majority of the alloys studied in this paper binary, Nbss + Nb5Si3 eutectics were observed. All of the eutectics studied in this paper contained Nbss and Nb5Si3. No eutectics that contained Nbss and Nb3Si were studied in this paper.
The experimental data [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56] about the actual average chemical compositions of the eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 observed in alloys of the aforementioned systems was used to study the alloying behaviour of the eutectic. Compositions of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 are given in [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. The eutectics had 1.9 < Al < 6.4 at.%, 1.3 < Cr < 7.7 at.%, 1.2 < Ge < 7.8 at.%, Hf < 8.6 at.%, 1.2 < Mo < 11.3 at.%, 8.1 < Si < 24.4 at.%, 1.2 < Sn < 5.4 at.%, 8.2 < Ti < 36.8 at.%, and 2 < W < 5.8 at.%. The total concentration of simple element and metalloid element additions in the eutectic is given in this paper as <Si> = Al + Ge + Si + Sn; i.e., the <Si> (at.%) includes the additions of Al, Ge, Si, and Sn, depending on whether Al, Ge, and Sn were present individually or simultaneously in the alloy.

3. Results and Discussion

The ranges of the values of the aforementioned parameters for the eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 are given in Table 1, where they are compared with those of the Nb-silicide based alloys [62] and Nbss in all of the alloys [38]. As was the case in [62], the parameters were not used to predict whether the eutectics are HEAs (high entropy alloys) or whether the solid solution and/or intermetallic(s) will be stable. They were used to study alloying behaviour in the eutectics, discover if there are relationships between parameters and between parameters and solute concentrations in eutectics, and find out if the hardness of eutectics is related to specific properties. Compared with Nb-silicide based alloys [62], the eutectics had wider ranges of ΔHmix, ΔSmix, Δχ, and Ω values, the VEC range was essentially the same, the range of δ values was narrow, and some eutectics had δ values that were lower than those in the Nb-silicide based alloys. Compared with Nb solid solutions [38], the eutectics had more negative ΔHmix values with a wider range, the ΔSmix range was slightly wider, the ranges of the VEC, Δχ, and δ values were narrow and in the ranges of the values of Nbss in all of the alloys, and the Ω values were smaller and outside the Ω range of the solid solution.
Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the relationship between the parameters ΔSmix and Ω, and ΔSmix and VEC of the eutectics, respectively. Figure 1 shows that the ΔSmix increases with Ω. All of the available data exhibits a linear fit with R2 = 0.8133, and the data subsets of the eutectics that contain only Sn (meaning <Si> = Al + Si + Sn) or only Ge (<Si> = Al + Ge + Si) exhibit better linear fits with R2 values of 0.8754 and 0.9863, respectively. Such a relationship was not exhibited by the ΔSmix and Ω parameters of the Nbss.
Figure 2 shows that the VEC parameter increases with the decreasing ΔSmix of the eutectic. The data in this figure is for eutectics in alloys with only a Ge or only an Sn addition. All of the data exhibits a linear fit with R2 = 0.8346. The linear fit for the eutectics with only Sn (green circles) or only Ge (brown circles), respectively, gives R2 = 0.8966 and R2 = 0.8183. Similar behaviour was not observed for the parameters VEC and ΔSmix of the Nbss.
The ΔHmix of the Nbss decreases (becomes more negative) as the parameter δ increases [38]. The same trend was found for the eutectics, see Figure 3. In Figure 3, the linear fit of all of the data is good (R2 = 0.8925), the data for the eutectics follows the trend of the data for the Nbss, and the gap in the ΔHmix values is shown by the horizontal dashed lines. There was also good correlation of the data in ΔHmix versus Ω (R2 = 0.8485), and Ω versus Δχ (R2 = 0.8515) plots (Figures not shown) for eutectics where Ge and Sn were present simultaneously (meaning <Si> = Al + Ge + Si + Sn).
The δ versus Δχ map of the eutectics is shown in Figure 4. The partitioning of Ti in the Nb-silicide based alloys is important for the chemical composition and properties of the Nbss and Nb5Si3. For example, Ti and Cr, and Ti and Hf “like each other” in the Nbss and Nb5Si3 (meaning the concentrations of Cr and Hf increase with increasing Ti concentration in the solid solution and the silicide) but not Ti, Mo, and W in the Nbss, in which as the Ti concentration increases, those of Mo and W decrease. The δ versus Δχ map separates the Ti-rich eutectics from the Ti-poor ones, and shows a gap in Δχ values between the two groups (note that in cast Nb-silicide based alloys with Ti additions, it is possible to form Ti-rich Nbss and Ti-rich Nb5Si3, [59,60]). The gap in Δχ values of the eutectics falls in the gap of Δχ values of the Nbss (Table 1). However, the δ versus Δχ map cannot separate the contributions made by different groups of alloying additions. This is possible in the Δχ versus VEC map of the eutectics, which is shown in Figure 5. The eutectics, whose data points fall in the gap of the Δχ values of the Nbss, belonged in alloys where only normal Nbss was formed [38]. The alloying elements in each data series in Figure 5 are indicated in the figure caption. In the series a, as well as in the series c to f, there is no Fe; there is no Ge in series f; there is no Mo in series a, b, and g; there is no Ta in series a, b, e, and g; there is no V in series a, b, e, and g; there is no W in series a, b, f, and g; and Zr is only in series c. It should be noted that the linear fits of the data “converge” to VEC ≈ 4.35 and Δχ ≈ 0.162. The “convergence” of the data suggested that alloying elements in the eutectics in Nb-silicide based alloys might have minimum and maximum concentrations. This was confirmed by further analysis of the data for the eutectics, as shown below.
The dependence of the parameter Δχ on the <Si> of the eutectics is shown in Figure 6. The data falls in different subsets, the alloying elements of which are given in the figure caption. All of the subsets “converge” to <Si> ≈ 21.6 at.% and Δχ ≈ 0.155. Series b and e have no Fe; there is no Mo, no Ta and no W in series a, b and e; the elements V and Zr are only in series c, and Y is only in series a and e. The trend between Δχ and <Si> for series c and d is the same as that of the parameter Δχ, and the sum of simple metal and metalloid element additions in Nb5Si3, as shown in Figure 7. Figure 7 has data for the Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys with/out eutectics, not for Nb5Si3 in eutectics. It should be noted that (i) the data in Figure 7 includes boron-containing silicides (their data falls on the same trend as for the other simple metal and metalloid elements) and (ii) there is no data for the chemical composition of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in boron-containing alloys (see Section 2). The data for the Δχ and <Si>Nbss of the Nbss, where <Si>Nbss = Al + Ge + Si + Sn, showed that the Δχ of the Nbss can increase or decrease with increasing <Si>Nbss, depending on alloying element additions. This would suggest that in the eutectics of the series c and d in Figure 6, the composition of the eutectics was “controlled” by the silicide. Similarities between the alloying elements in the different series in Figure 5 and Figure 6 should be noted.
The dependence of δ on the <Si> of the eutectic is shown in Figure 8. The data falls in different subsets, the alloying elements of which are given in the figure caption. Series b and d have no Fe, there is no Mo in series d, there is no Ta in series a, there is no V in series d, and Y and Zr are only present in series c. All of the series “converge” to <Si> ≈ 24.35 at.% and δ ≈ 9.25 The parameter δ increases with increasing <Si> for all of the series. Similarities between the alloying elements in the different series in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 8 should be noted.
Titanium is an important addition in Nb-silicide based alloys, because it improves oxidation and toughness, and reduces density. It partitions to Nbss and Nb5Si3 [59,60] where its concentration affects that of other elements. Both phases can have Ti-rich areas that persist only in the silicide after exposure to high temperatures [59,60]. The relationship between the Ti and Si concentrations of the eutectics is shown in Figure 9. The data falls into four subsets, of which series d has no Al and Cr. All four series “converge” to Si ≈ 21.6 at.% and Ti ≈ 8.7 at.%, and show that the Si concentration in the eutectic decreases as the Ti concentration increases. The latter was also the case for the Ti and Si concentrations in Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys with/out eutectics, but not for the Nbss where the Si concentration increases as the Ti concentration increases.
Aluminium is added at low concentrations in Nb-silicide based alloys because of its adverse effect on their toughness. It reduces density and contributes to the improvement of oxidation resistance with additions of B, Ge, or Sn. It partitions to Nbss and Nb5Si3, where its concentration depends on other alloying elements [59,60]. Figure 10 shows the relationship between the Al and Si concentrations of the eutectics. The data falls in three subsets, with the alloying elements in each series indicated in the figure caption. All of the subsets of data show that as the Si concentration in the eutectic decreases, the Al content increases, which is in agreement with the data for Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys with/out eutectics, but not with the data for the Nbss. The data “converges” to Al ≈ 6.3 at.% and Si ≈ 8 at.%. Similarities between the alloying elements in the different series in Figure 9 and Figure 10 should be noted.
In Nb-silicide based alloys, Hf is added to improve the oxidation and toughness and scavenge oxygen to form hafnia. Hafnium partitions to both the Nbss and Nb5Si3, and its concentration is related to that of Ti in the two phases. The Hf concentration decreases with decreasing Si concentration in eutectics, and the data “converges” to Hf ≈ 1 at.% and Si ≈ 10 at.%. The trend of the data (figure not shown) is the same as that of the Hf and Si concentrations in the Nbss in Nb-silicide based alloys with/out eutectics. There is no correlation between the Hf and Si concentrations in Nb5Si3.
The “convergence” of data that was shown earlier would suggest that (i) the alloying elements have maximum and minimum concentrations in the eutectics, and (ii) the maximum concentrations of Al and Si in the eutectic are about 6.3 at.% and 21.6 at.%, respectively. The minimum concentration of Ti in the eutectic is about 8.7 at.%, and the minimum concentration of Si in the eutectic is in the range of 8 at.% to 10 at.%.
The refractory metals Mo, Ta, and W can be present in the eutectics, and can stabilise their lamellar microstructure at high temperatures, depending on the other alloying additions in the Nb-silicide based alloy [41,42,50,53,60,61]. Their concentration in the eutectic also is related to the Si concentration of the latter. Molybdenum is chosen to demonstrate this relationship in this paper. Figure 11 shows that the Mo concentration of the eutectics decreases as the Si concentration increases. This is consistent with the data for the Nbss in Nb-silicide based alloys with/out eutectics, which shows the same trend, and also with the partitioning behaviour of Ti and Mo in the solid solution where, as the Ti concentration increases, the Mo concentration decreases.
Data for the hardness of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 is available for the Nb-silicide based alloys without the addition of Ti, and are shown in Figure 12. The eutectics were observed in alloys of the following systems: Nb-Si-Sn, Nb-Si-Ge, Nb-Si-Hf-Al, Nb-Si-Hf-Sn, Nb-Si-Ge-Al, and Nb-Si-Cr-Ge [40,43,45,47,48,49]. The eutectics in the alloys in Figure 12 had <Si> = Si + Sn, <Si> = Si + Al, <Si> = Si + Ge, or <Si> = Si + Al + Ge. The microstructures of the Sn-containing alloys consisted of three phases, namely Nbss, Nb5Si3, and A15-Nb3Sn, and the microstructures of the alloys without Sn addition contained only Nbss and Nb5Si3. The data points for the alloys with A15-Nb3Sn in their microstructures are indicated in the blue colour in Figure 12. Figure 12a shows that the hardness of the eutectics increased as the VEC increased. The same trend between hardness and VEC was observed for the hardness of the A15-Nb3X phases in the Nb-silicide based alloys [63], for β(Nb,Ti)5Si3 (see below), and for the hardness of tetragonal Nb5Si3, as shown in Figure 13. Note that the data in the latter figure is for the Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, not for the Nb5Si3 lamellae in eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in such alloys. The elements in each data series in Figure 13 are given in the caption. Mo is only in series c; W is only in series d, which does not also have B, Ge, and Ta; V is not in series a and b; and there is no Sn in series b. Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 have been observed in boron-containing Nb-silicide based alloys. There is data for the chemical composition and hardness of the 5-3 silicide in the microstructure of the latter, but not for the eutectics (see Section 2).
The data for the alloys with A15-Nb3Sn in Figure 12 falls on the same line as the data for the eutectics with only Nbss and Nb5Si3, and all of the data exhibits a very good linear fit (R2 = 0.9686). Figure 12b shows that the hardness of the eutectics decreased as their <Si> increased. The linear fit of the hardness versus the <Si> data is also good (R2 = 0.9012), but this was not the case when hardness was plotted against the concentration of Si in the eutectics, which varied from 10.3 at.% to 20 at.% for the alloys in Figure 12.
The ranking of the eutectics in Figure 12 in terms of their hardness from low to high values does not follow the ranking of the hardness of alloyed Nb5Si3 that was discussed in [39]. Figure 12 suggests that the VEC of the eutectic should decrease as its <Si> content increases. Indeed, this is the case as shown in Figure 14, which also confirms that the data converges to VEC ≈ 4.35 and <Si> ≈ 23 at.%. In Figure 14, there is no Cr in series c, there is no Fe in series c to e, there is no Ge in series e, there is no Mo in series b and e, and there is no Y in series a and c to e. Meanwhile, Ta is present only in series c; V is present only in series a and c; W is present only in series a, c, and d; and Zr is present only in series c. Note the similarities with the data series in Figure 14 and in Figure 6 and Figure 8. The data in Figure 6, Figure 8 and Figure 14 shows that <Si> and Δχ “converge” respectively in the ranges 21.6 at.% to 24.3 at.%, and 0.155 to 0.162.
The hardness of intermetallics has been reported to depend on the scale of their microstructure, and to follow a Hall–Petch relationship [64,65]. Intermetallics participate in eutectics; examples include the Al/Al2Cu, Al/Al3Ni, Nb/Nb3Si, and Nb/Nb5Si3 eutectics. In a eutectic, the inter-lamellar spacing, the properties of the participating phases, and the interfaces between the lamellae are expected to define their mechanical properties. Refinement of eutectic microstructure can be affected by solidification conditions and/or alloying additions. When the eutectic spacing is refined, the role of interfaces becomes important. Lamellar interfaces are expected to play a major role in the deformation of eutectics.
The improvement of properties of directionally solidified (DS) eutectics with microstructure refinement has been related to a Hall–Petch relationship for eutectics. For Al–Si eutectics, there are different hardness versus inter-lamellar spacing relationships for different silicon morphologies [66]. Mason et al. showed that the hardness of a Mo5Si3/MoSi2 eutectic depended on lamellar spacing in accordance with a Hall–Petch relationship, where the hardness was dependent upon the scale of the lamellae of MoSi2 [67]. Dislocation pile-ups are necessary for Hall–Petch strengthening. Grain boundaries impede dislocation propagation from one grain to the next. As the dislocations pile up against a grain boundary, the stress field assists dislocations to traverse the grain boundary, and thus, deformation spreads from grain to grain. Dislocations are generated during indentation for the measurement of hardness [68]. For the Mo5Si3/MoSi2 eutectic, Mason et al. suggested that the Mo5Si3 silicide behaved as an impenetrable barrier [67].
What is known about the deformation of lamellar microstructures consisting of alloyed Nbss and Nb5Si3? How would a strong or weak Nbss/Nb5Si3 interface behave under mechanical loading? How important is an orientation relationship between Nbss and Nb5Si3 for the deformation of a lamellar Nbss/Nb5Si3 structure? Does the morphology of Nb5Si3 depend on alloying additions? To answer these questions, we need to consider first microstructures based on the Nb–Si binary phase diagram, and then Nb–Si-based (i.e., alloyed) microstructures. Research on the deformation of Nb in Nb/Nb5Si3 micro-laminate Nb–Si binary foils [69] has highlighted the importance of layer thickness and confirmed that the deformation of Nb was dependent on the thickness of its layers in the foils. As the thickness of the latter increased, their fracture changed from ductile to brittle. This change in fracture mode was attributed to the constraint of Nb and/or changes of crack propagation rate [69]. The hardness of the Nb layers in the micro-laminate foils was 5.4 GPa, which is very close to the hardness of the 1-μm thick Nb thin films that were reported in [70], and significantly higher than the hardness of about 1.6 GPa of about 13-μm Nb particles. The high hardness of the Nb layers was attributed to “their small grain size and the narrow spaced Nb5Si3 layers, both of which acted to restrain dislocation motion in the Nb layers” [69]. Gavens et al. also reported that the estimated high average fracture strength of Nb5Si3 was typical of that of high strength ceramic fibres [69].
A study of a Nb(001)/αNb5Si3(001) interface using a first-principles calculation showed that some of the Nb atoms at the interface become a part of Nb5Si3, and that the Nb–Si bonds at the interface are the likely sites for micro-cracking [71]. This study reported that the work of adhesion and fracture energy of the Nb(001)/αNb5Si3(001) interface were 4.4 J/m2 and 33.7 J/m2, respectively.
In Nb-silicide based alloys, both the Nbss and the Nb5Si3 are alloyed, and the Nbss/Nb5Si3 interface can be Ti-rich (see Section 2). Also, alloying can affect the morphology of Nb5Si3, whose cross-sections can change from circular to polygonal as the entropy of fusion of Nb5Si3 increases, owing to alloying additions. The mechanical properties of [Nbss](002) /[αNb5Si3](002) interfaces in a directionally solidified Nb-silicide based alloy of nominal composition Nb-24Ti-15Si-4Cr-2Al-2Hf (at.%) were studied experimentally, and with finite element modelling by Guan et al. [72]. The lower work of the adhesion and fracture energy values compared with the work of Shang et al. [71] were attributed to the alloying of the [Nbss](002)/[αNb5Si3](002) interface, as the latter would be expected to be rich in Ti and Hf on the silicide side and Ti, Hf, Al and Cr on the Nb side, and the different orientation relationship of the studied interface.
The data in Figure 12 is not for the same eutectic of one specific alloy composition, but for different eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in different alloys. In the latter, the phases that participated in the eutectics had different chemical compositions and different hardness, and the eutectics had similar inter-lamellar spacing, but not the same volume fractions of phases and different Nbss/Nb5Si3 interface chemistries. Yet, the hardness versus the VEC data for the eutectics of these different alloys followed a remarkable linear relationship with a very good R2 value (=0.9686). This strong relationship is attributed to the covalent bonded intermetallic phase(s) in the eutectics, which are suggested to be the key phases that determine the hardness of the eutectics.
In the solid solution, the bonding is delocalized, and the hardness depends on grain size, grain boundaries, and contamination by interstitials (impurities). In covalent compounds, the mobilities of dislocations are low because of the localized bonding [73]. The dependence of the hardness of covalent bonded hard materials on their shear modulus is stronger than the relationship between the hardness and their bulk modulus [74]. The latter measures the resistance to volume change, which is not the case with the hardness test, and the former is a measure of the rigidity against shape change in the hardness test. Among the various shear stiffnesses, only C44 represents a shape change without volume change. Thus, C44 provides direct information about the electronic response to shear strain [75]. Jhi et al. [75] showed that there exists a relationship between C44 and VEC, and hardness and VEC for different transition metal carbonitrides. For each carbonitride, the trend in the aforementioned relationships was the same, the C44 and hardness increased with decreasing VEC to a maximum value for VEC of about 8.4. Wang and Zhou [75] showed that the C44 of M2AlC increased with increasing VEC in the order M = Ti, Nb, V, and Cr. The polynomial fit of the data indicated a maximum value of C44 for a VEC of about 8.5. It was also suggested that the hardness of M2AlC compounds could be predicted from the correlation between C44 and VEC [76].
Figure 15 and Figure 16 respectively show the C44 and VEC, and hardness and VEC relationships for α(Nb,Ti)5Si3 and β(Nb,Ti)5Si3 for Ti = 0, 3.125, 6.25, 9.375, and 12.5 at.% using data for C44 from [77]. Unfortunately, there is no experimental data for the hardness of (Nb,Ti)5Si3 silicides. In [39], it was shown that the hardness values that were calculated using the equation HV = 2[(G/B)2G]0.585 – 3 were in better agreement with the available experimental data. The calculations of the hardness values in Figure 15 and Figure 16 used the above equation with data for shear G and bulk B moduli from [77]. Figure 15b shows that the hardness of α(Nb,Ti)5Si3 increases as the Ti concentration increases and the VEC decreases. Figure 16b shows that the hardness of β(Nb,Ti)5Si3 decreases as the Ti concentration decreases and the VEC increases. The polynomial fit of the data in Figure 15 and Figure 16a showed respectively for α(Nb,Ti)5Si3 and β(Nb,Ti)5Si3 maximum and minimum values of C44 for essentially the same VEC (4.426 and 4.429, respectively). Figure 15 shows that the trends between the C44 and VEC and hardness and VEC of α(Nb,Ti)5Si3 are the same as those reported for transition metal carbonitrides [75]. The trend between the C44 and VEC of β(Nb,Ti)5Si3 is the same as that reported for M2AlC compounds [76]. It should be noted that the trend between hardness and VEC is the same in Figure 12a and Figure 16b; the hardness increases as the VEC increases. Figure 16b is for β(Nb,Ti)5Si3. The βNb5Si3 is the 5-3 silicide in the metastable eutectic (see Introduction).
The eutectics in Figure 12 had 5-3 silicides where only Si was substituted by other simple metal and metalloid elements. There is no C44 data for these alloyed silicides. It is suggested that their C44 also correlates with VEC. It would be interesting to compare their C44 versus VEC and hardness versus the VEC correlations with those of (Nb,Ti)5Si3 silicides.

4. Conclusions

In Nb-silicide based alloys, eutectics that contain Nbss and Nb5Si3 can form. It was shown that the alloying behaviour of the eutectics, the great majority of which are binary Nbss + Nb5Si3 eutectics, can be described using the parameters ΔHmix, ΔSmix, VEC, δ, Δχ, and Ω.
The values of these parameters were in the ranges −41.9 < ΔHmix < −25.5 kJ/mol, 4.7 < ΔSmix < 15 J/molK, 4.33 < VEC < 4.89, 6.23 < δ < 9.44, 0.38 < Ω < 1.35, and 0.118 < Δχ < 0.248, with a gap in the Δχ values between 0.164 and 0.181.
Compared with Nb-silicide based alloys, the eutectics had wider ranges of ΔHmix, ΔSmix, Δχ, and Ω values, the VEC range was essentially the same, the range of δ values was narrow, and some eutectics had δ values lower than the Nb-silicide based alloys.
Compared with Nb solid solutions, the eutectics had more negative ΔHmix values within a wider range; the range of ΔSmix values was slightly wider; the ranges of the VEC, Δχ, and δ values were narrow; and in the ranges of the values of Nbss in the Nb-silicide based alloys, the Ω values were smaller, and outside the range of the Ω values of the solid solution.
There were correlations between ΔSmix, Ω, ΔSmix, and VEC for all of the eutectics. The correlation between ΔHmix and δ was the same as that of the Nbss.
Specific maps of the studied parameters could describe the alloying of the eutectics. The δ versus Δχ map separated the Ti-rich from the Ti-poor eutectics, with a gap in Δχ values between 0.164 and 0.181, which is within the Δχ gap of the Nbss. Eutectics were also separated according to alloying element additions in the Δχ versus VEC, Δχ versus <Si>, δ versus <Si>, and VEC versus <Si> maps where <Si> = Al + Ge + Si + Sn.
The convergence of data in maps indicated that (i) the eutectics had δ ≈ 9.25 and VEC ≈ 4.35 and Δχ in the range ≈ 0.155 to 0.162, and <Si> in the range ≈ 21.6 at.% to ≈ 24.3 at.%, (ii) the minimum concentration of Ti, and maximum concentrations of Al and Si in the eutectic were about 8.7 at.% Ti, and 6.3 at.% Al and 21.6 at.% Si, respectively and (iii) the minimum concentration of Si in the eutectic was in the range 8 < Si < 10 at.%.

Acknowledgments

The support of the University of Sheffield, EPSRC (GR/R09367, GR/S81759, EP/H500405/1, EP/L026678/1) and Rolls-Royce Plc and discussions with all the members (current and past) of the research group are gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bewlay, B.P.; Jackson, M.R.; Gigliotti, M.F.X. Niobium Silicide High Temperature In-Situ Composites. In Intermetallic Compounds, Principles and Practice; Westbrook, J.H., Fleisher, R.L., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 2001; pp. 541–560. [Google Scholar]
  2. Broutman, L.J.; Krock, H.H. Modern Composite Materials; Addison Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1967; p. 442. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sharp, R.M.; Flemings, M.C. Growth of composites of off-eutectic alloys. In Proceedings of the Conference In-Situ Composites, Lakeville, CT, USA, 5–8 September 1972; National Materials Advisory Board: Washington, DC, USA, 1972; Volume 1, pp. 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mollard, F.R.; Flemings, M.C. Growth of composites from melt—Part I. TMS-AIME 1967, 239, 1534–1539. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yue, A.S.; Kaba, B.D. Fracture behaviour of unidirectionally solidified Ti-Ti5Si3 eutectic composites. ASTM STP 1975, 580, 504–514. [Google Scholar]
  6. Crossman, F.W.; Yue, A.S. Unidirectionally solidified Ti-TiB and Ti-Ti5Si3 eutectic composites. Metall. Trans. 1971, 2, 1545–1555. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jehanno, P.; Heilmaier, M.; Kestler, H.; Boning, M.; Venskutonis, A.; Bewlay, B.; Jackson, M. Assessment of a powder metallurgical route for refractory metal silicide alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2005, 36, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schlesinger, M.E.; Okamoto, H.; Gokhale, A.B.; Abbaschian, R. The Nb-Si (Niobium-Silicon) system. J. Phase Equilib. 1993, 14, 502–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bewlay, B.P.; Lipsitt, H.A.; Reeder, W.J.; Jackson, M.R.; Sutliff, J.A. Toughening mechanisms in directionally solidified Nb-Nb3Si-Nb3Si5 in-situ composites. In Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials III; Ravi, V.A., Srivatsan, T.S., Moore, J.J., Eds.; The Minerals Metals and Materials Society: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1994; pp. 547–565. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yuan, S.; Jia, L.; Ma, L.; Cui, R.; Su, L.; Zhang, H. The microstructure optimising of the Nb-14Si-22Ti-4Cr-2Al-2Hf alloy processed by directional solidification. Mater. Lett. 2012, 84, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Su, L.; Jia, L.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, H. Microstructure and room temperature fracture toughness of directionally solidified Nb-Si-Ti-Cr-Al-Hf alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 560, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.; Jia, L.; Ma, L.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H. Microstructure optimisation of directionally solidified hypereutectic Nb-Si alloy. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2013, 23, 2874–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weng, J.F.; Jia, L.N.; Yuan, S.N.; Su, L.F.; Ding, F.; Zhang, H. Microstructure evolution of directionally solidified Nb-Si alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2014, 30, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, H.; Guo, X. Microstructure evolution and room temperature fracture toughness of an integrally directionally solidified Nb-Ti-Si based ultrahigh temperature alloy. Scr. Mater. 2011, 64, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, S.N.; Jia, L.N.; Su, L.F.; Ma, L.M.; Zhang, H. Microstructure evolution and solidification behaviour of Nb-16Si-22Ti-2Cr-2Al-6Hf alloy processed by directional solidification. Mater. Res. Innov. 2013, 17, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, B.H.; Guo, X.P. Microstructure of Nb-Ti-Si based ultrahigh temperature alloy processed by integrally directional solidification. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2015, 31, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sekido, N.; Kimura, Y.; Miura, S.; Wei, F.; Mishima, Y. Fracture toughness and high temperature strength of unidirectionally solidified Nb-Si binary and Nb-Ti-Si ternary alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 425, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sekido, N.; Kimura, Y.; Miura, S.; Mishima, Y. Microstructure development of unidirectionally solidified (Nb)/Nb3Si eutectic alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 444, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hunag, Q.; Guo, X.; Kang, Y.; Song, J.; Qu, S.; Han, Y. Microstructures and mechanical properties of directionally solidified multi-element Nb-Si alloy. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2011, 21, 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, G.M.; He, L.L. Microstructure evolution and room temperature deformation of a unidirectionally solidified Nb-22Ti-16Si-3Ta-2Hf-7Cr-3Al-0.2Ho (at.%) alloy. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Miura, S.; Ohsasa, K.; Ma, C.; Zhang, H. Ultra-high temperature Nbss/Nb5Si3 fully lamellar microstructure developed by directional solidification in OFZ furnace. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. McCaughey, C. The Solidification of Niobium Silicides for Next Generation Gas Turbine Engines. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bendersky, L.; Biancaniello, F.S.; Boettinger, W.J.; Perepezko, J.H. Microstructural characterisation of rapidly solidified Nb-Si alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1987, 89, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abbaschian, R.; Lipschutz, M.D. Eutectic solidification processing via bulk melt undercooling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1997, 226–228, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Dong, S.; Wei, B.; Li, W. Undercooling and rapid solidification of Nb-Si eutectic alloys studied by long drop tube. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2006, 16, s89–s92. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liang, H.; Chang, Y.A. Thermodynamic modelling of the Nb-Si-Ti ternary system. Intermetallics 1999, 7, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Okamoto, H.; Gokhale, A.B.; Abbaschian, G.J. Binary Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed.; Massalski, T.B., Ed.; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 1990; pp. 2764–2768. [Google Scholar]
  28. Okamoto, H. Phase Diagrams for Binary Alloys: Desk Handbook; ASM International: Metals Park, OH, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fernandes, P.B.; Coelho, G.C.; Ferreira, F.; Nunes, C.A.; Sudman, B. Thermodynamic modelling of the Nb-Si system. Intermetallics 2002, 10, 993–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. ASM Alloy Phase Diagram Database; Villars, P.; Okamoto, H.; Cenzual, K. (Eds.) ASM International: Materials Park, OH, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Geng, T.; Li, C.; Bao, J.; Zhao, X.; Du, Z.; Guo, C. Thermodynamic assessment of the Nb-Si-Ti system. Intermetallics 2009, 17, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, Y.; Li, C.; Du, Z.; Guo, C.; Zhao, X. As-cast microstructures and solidification paths of the Nb-Si-Ti ternary alloys in Nb5Si3–Ti5Si3 region. Rare Met. 2015, 32, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gigolotti, J.C.J.; Coelho, G.C.; Nunes, C.A.; Suzuki, P.A.; Joubert, J. Experimental evaluation of the Nb-Si-Ti system from as-cast alloys. Intermetallics 2017, 82, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Goldschmidt, H.J.; Brand, J.A. The constitution of the chromium–niobium–silicon system. J. Less-Common Met. 1961, 3, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, C.; Jackson, M.R.; Peluso, L.A. Determination of the Nb-Cr-Si phase diagram using diffusion multiples. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 6395–6405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Geng, J.; Shao, G.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of three-phase equilibrium in the Nb rich corner of Nb-Si-Cr system. Intermetallics 2006, 14, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bewlay, B.P.; Yang, Y.; Casey, R.L.; Jackson, M.R.; Chang, Y.A. Experimental study of the liquid-solid phase equilibria at the metal rich region of the Nb-Cr-Si system. Intermetallics 2009, 17, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsakiropoulos, P. On the Nb silicide based alloys: Part I—The bcc Nb solid solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 708, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsakiropoulos, P. On the alloying and properties of tetragonal Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. Materials 2018, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Grammenos, I.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the role of Al, Cr and Ti additions in the microstructure of Nb-18Si-5Hf base alloys. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grammenos, I.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the role of Mo and Ta additions in the microstructure of Nb-18Si-5Hf silicide based alloys. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 1524–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grammenos, I.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the role of Hf, Mo and W additions in the microstructure of Nb-20Si silicide based alloys. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 1612–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vellios, N.; Tsakiropoulos, P. The role of Sn and Ti additions in the microstructure of Nb-18Si based alloys. Intermetallics 2007, 15, 1518–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vellios, N.; Tsakiropoulos, P. The role of Fe and Ti additions in the microstructure of Nb-18Si-5Sn silicide based alloys. Intermetallics 2007, 15, 1529–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, Z.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the effects of Ge addition on the microstructure of Nb-18Si in situ composites. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 1072–1078. [Google Scholar]
  46. Li, Z.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the effect of Ti and Ge in the microstructure of Nb-24Ti-18Si-5Ge in situ composite. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Z.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the effect of Cr and Ti additions in the microstructure of Nb-18Si-5Ge based in situ composites. Intermetallics 2012, 26, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Z.; Tsakiropoulos, P. The microstructures of Nb-18Si-5Ge-5Al and Nb-24Ti-18Si-5Ge-5Al in situ composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 550, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zacharis, E.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Development of N Silicide Based Alloys with Hf and Sn Additions. University of Sheffield: Sheffield, UK, Unpublished Research. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhao, J. The Role of Refractory Metals in Controlling Properties of Nb-silicide Based In Situ Composites. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xu, Z. The Effect of Sn on the Phase Stability and Oxidation Behaviour of Nb-silicide Based Alloys. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  52. Vellios, N.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Nb-silicide Based Alloys with Sn and Fe Additions. University of Surrey: Guildford, UK, Unpublished Research. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  53. Anazodo, B.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Nb-Si Alloys with Refractory Metal and Metalloid Element Additions. University of Sheffield: Sheffield, UK, Unpublished Research. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ghadyani, M. Study of the Microstructure and Oxidation of Alloys on the Al-Hf-Nb-Si-Ti System. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  55. Tweddle, A.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Nb-Si Based Alloys with Ge Additions. University of Sheffield: Sheffield, UK, Unpublished Research. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  56. Nelson, J. Study of the Effects of Cr, Hf and Sn with Refractory Metal Additions on the Microstructure and Properties of Nb-silicide Based Alloys. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kim, W.; Tanaka, H.; Kasama, A.; Hanada, S. Microstructure and room temperature fracture toughness of Nbss/Nb5Si3 in situ composites. Intermetallics 2001, 9, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kashyap, S.; Tiwary, C.S.; Chattopadhyay, K. Effect of Gallium on microstructure and mechanical properties of Nb-Si eutectic alloy. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 1943–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zelenitsas, K.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the role of Al and Cr additions in the microstructure of Nb-Ti-Si in situ composites. Intermetallics 2005, 13, 1079–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zelenitsas, K.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Study of the role of Ta and Cr additions in the microstructure of Nb-Ti-Si-Al in situ composites. Intermetallics 2006, 14, 639–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grammenos, I.; Tsakiropoulos, P. Development of Creep Resistant Nb Silicide Based Alloys. University of Surrey: Guildford, UK, Unpublished Research. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tsakiropoulos, P. On Nb silicide based alloys: Part II. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 748, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tsakiropoulos, P. Alloying and properties of C14-NbCr2 and A15-Nb3X (X = Al, Ge, Si, Sn) in Nb-silicide based alloys. Materials 2018, 11, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Westbrook, J.H. Intermetallic Compounds; R E Krieger Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1997; p. 471. [Google Scholar]
  65. Tiwari, R.; Herman, H.; Sampath, S. Vacuum plasma spraying of MoSi2 and its composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1992, 155, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yilmaz, F.; Elliot, R. The microstructure and mechanical properties of unidirectionally solidified Al-Si alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 1989, 24, 2065–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mason, D.P.; van Aken, D.C. The effect of microstructural scale on hardness of MoSi2-Mo5Si3 eutectics. Scr. Met. 1993, 28, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Boldt, P.H.; Embury, J.D.; Weatherly, G.C. Room temperature micro-indentation of single crystal MoSi2. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1992, 155, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gavens, A.J.; van Heerden, D.; Foecke, T.; Weihs, T.P. Fabrication and evaluation of Nb/Nb5Si3 micro-laminate foils. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1999, 30, 2959–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ji, H.; Was, G.S.; Jones, J.W. Layered Materials for Structural, Applications. In Proceedings of the Materials Research Society Symposia, San Francisco, CA, USA, 8–10 April 1996; Materials Research Society: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996; Volume 434, pp. 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  71. Shang, J.X.; Guan, K.; Wang, F.H. Atomic structure and adhesion of the Nb(001)/αNb5Si3(001) interface: A first-principles study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2010, 22, 085004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Guan, K.; Jia, L.; Kong, B.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, H. Improvement of fracture toughness of directionally solidified Nb-silicide in situ composites using artificial neural network. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2016, 663, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gilman, J.J. Physical chemistry of intrinsic hardness. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1996, 209, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Teter, D.M. Computational alchemy: The search for new superhard materials. MRS Bull. 1998, 23, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Jhi, S.; Ihm, J.; Loule, S.G.; Cohen, M.L. Electronic mechanism of hardness enhancement in transition-metal carbo-nitrides. Nature 1999, 399, 132–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, J.; Zhou, Y. Dependence of elastic stiffness on electronic band structure of nanolaminate M2AlC (M = Ti, V, Nb and Cr) ceramics. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 214111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Papadimitriou, I.; Utton, C.; Tsakiropoulos, P. The impact of Ti and temperature on the stability of Nb5Si3 phases: A first-principles study. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2017, 18, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 11 00592 g001 550
Figure 1. ΔSmix versus Ω of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, all data R2 = 0.8133, eutectics with only Sn (filled green circles) R2 = 0.8754, eutectics with only Ge (filled brown circles) R2 = 0.9863.
Figure 1. ΔSmix versus Ω of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, all data R2 = 0.8133, eutectics with only Sn (filled green circles) R2 = 0.8754, eutectics with only Ge (filled brown circles) R2 = 0.9863.
Materials 11 00592 g001
Materials 11 00592 g002 550
Figure 2. ΔSmix versus VEC of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys with only Ge or Sn. All of the data R2 = 0.8346, eutectics with only Sn (filled green circles) R2 = 0.8966, eutectics with only Ge (filled brown circles) R2 = 0.8183.
Figure 2. ΔSmix versus VEC of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys with only Ge or Sn. All of the data R2 = 0.8346, eutectics with only Sn (filled green circles) R2 = 0.8966, eutectics with only Ge (filled brown circles) R2 = 0.8183.
Materials 11 00592 g002
Materials 11 00592 g003 550
Figure 3. ΔHmix versus δ of Nbss (filled blue circles) and of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 (filled red circles) in Nb-silicide based alloys. All of the data linear fit with R2 = 0.8925.
Figure 3. ΔHmix versus δ of Nbss (filled blue circles) and of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 (filled red circles) in Nb-silicide based alloys. All of the data linear fit with R2 = 0.8925.
Materials 11 00592 g003
Materials 11 00592 g004 550
Figure 4. δ versus Δχ of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. The gap in Δχ values (0.164 < Δχ < 0.181) separates eutectics with low Ti concentrations (8.3 < Ti < 13.5 at.%), which are shown with filled red circles, from those of high Ti concentration (20.5 < Ti < 45 at.%), which are shown with filled green circles.
Figure 4. δ versus Δχ of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. The gap in Δχ values (0.164 < Δχ < 0.181) separates eutectics with low Ti concentrations (8.3 < Ti < 13.5 at.%), which are shown with filled red circles, from those of high Ti concentration (20.5 < Ti < 45 at.%), which are shown with filled green circles.
Materials 11 00592 g004
Materials 11 00592 g005 550
Figure 5. Δχ versus VEC of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. Series a (R2 = 0.9447) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.9843) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Si, Sn, and Ti; series c (R2 = 0.8254) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, and Zr; series d (R2 = 0.9893) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, and W; series e (R2 = 0.9895) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, and W; series f (R2 = 0.5210) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and V; series g (R2 = 0.8619) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, and Ti.
Figure 5. Δχ versus VEC of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. Series a (R2 = 0.9447) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.9843) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Si, Sn, and Ti; series c (R2 = 0.8254) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, and Zr; series d (R2 = 0.9893) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, and W; series e (R2 = 0.9895) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, and W; series f (R2 = 0.5210) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and V; series g (R2 = 0.8619) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, and Ti.
Materials 11 00592 g005
Materials 11 00592 g006 550
Figure 6. Δχ versus <Si> of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. Series a (R2 = 0.9216) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.9222) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, and Ti; series c (R2 = 09095) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, and Zr; series d (R2 = 0.9787) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and W; series e (R2 = 0.95) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y.
Figure 6. Δχ versus <Si> of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. Series a (R2 = 0.9216) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.9222) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, and Ti; series c (R2 = 09095) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, and Zr; series d (R2 = 0.9787) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and W; series e (R2 = 0.95) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y.
Materials 11 00592 g006
Materials 11 00592 g007 550
Figure 7. Δχ of tetragonal Nb5Si3 versus X (= Al + B + Ge + Si + Sn) in Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, see text.
Figure 7. Δχ of tetragonal Nb5Si3 versus X (= Al + B + Ge + Si + Sn) in Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, see text.
Materials 11 00592 g007
Materials 11 00592 g008 550
Figure 8. δ versus <Si> of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. Series a (R2 = 0.9707) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series b (R2 = 0.9348) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, and W; series c (R2 = 0.9522) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, Y, and Zr; and series d (R2 = 0.978) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and W.
Figure 8. δ versus <Si> of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys. Series a (R2 = 0.9707) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series b (R2 = 0.9348) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, and W; series c (R2 = 0.9522) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, Y, and Zr; and series d (R2 = 0.978) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and W.
Materials 11 00592 g008
Materials 11 00592 g009 550
Figure 9. Ti versus Si of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, series a (R2 = 0.9443), with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, W, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.7759) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series c (R2 = 0.9405) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series d (R2 = 0.9283) with alloying element additions of Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and W.
Figure 9. Ti versus Si of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, series a (R2 = 0.9443), with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, W, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.7759) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series c (R2 = 0.9405) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series d (R2 = 0.9283) with alloying element additions of Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and W.
Materials 11 00592 g009
Materials 11 00592 g010 550
Figure 10. Al versus Si of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, series a (R2 = 0.9644) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, W, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.9113) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, W, and Y; series c (R2 = 0.9424) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, and W.
Figure 10. Al versus Si of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, series a (R2 = 0.9644) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, W, and Y; series b (R2 = 0.9113) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, W, and Y; series c (R2 = 0.9424) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, and W.
Materials 11 00592 g010
Materials 11 00592 g011 550
Figure 11. Mo versus Si of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, elements in eutectics: Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Nb, Si, Sn, Ti, and W.
Figure 11. Mo versus Si of eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, elements in eutectics: Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Nb, Si, Sn, Ti, and W.
Materials 11 00592 g011
Materials 11 00592 g012 550
Figure 12. Average Vickers hardness of eutectics versus (a) VEC and (b) <Si> of eutectics. In both (a,b), data for the eutectics with Sn is shown in blue, data for the eutectics with Al is shown in brown, data for the eutectics with Al and Ge is shown in red, data for the eutectics with Ge is shown in green, and data for the eutectics with Cr and Ge is shown in purple.
Figure 12. Average Vickers hardness of eutectics versus (a) VEC and (b) <Si> of eutectics. In both (a,b), data for the eutectics with Sn is shown in blue, data for the eutectics with Al is shown in brown, data for the eutectics with Al and Ge is shown in red, data for the eutectics with Ge is shown in green, and data for the eutectics with Cr and Ge is shown in purple.
Materials 11 00592 g012
Materials 11 00592 g013 550
Figure 13. Average Vickers hardness of tetragonal Nb5Si3 silicides (not in eutectics) versus their VEC values. Alloying element additions in series a (R2 = 0.9621) are Al, B, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ta, and Ti; the alloying element additions in series b (R2 = 0.9645) are Al, B, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, and Ti; the alloying element additions in series c (R2 = 0.963) are Al, B, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and V; and the alloying element additions in series d (R2 = 0.921) are Al, Cr, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W.
Figure 13. Average Vickers hardness of tetragonal Nb5Si3 silicides (not in eutectics) versus their VEC values. Alloying element additions in series a (R2 = 0.9621) are Al, B, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ta, and Ti; the alloying element additions in series b (R2 = 0.9645) are Al, B, Cr, Ge, Hf, Si, and Ti; the alloying element additions in series c (R2 = 0.963) are Al, B, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, and V; and the alloying element additions in series d (R2 = 0.921) are Al, Cr, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W.
Materials 11 00592 g013
Materials 11 00592 g014 550
Figure 14. VEC versus <Si> map for eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, series a (R2 = 0.9464) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series b (R2 = 0.9112) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y; series c (R2 = 0.9061) with alloying element additions of Al, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, and Zr; series d (R2 = 0.8962) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, and W; series e (R2 = 0.9775) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Hf, Si, Sn, and Ti.
Figure 14. VEC versus <Si> map for eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide based alloys, series a (R2 = 0.9464) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, V, and W; series b (R2 = 0.9112) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Fe, Ge, Hf, Si, Sn, Ti, and Y; series c (R2 = 0.9061) with alloying element additions of Al, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ta, Ti, V, W, and Zr; series d (R2 = 0.8962) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Ge, Hf, Mo, Si, Sn, Ti, and W; series e (R2 = 0.9775) with alloying element additions of Al, Cr, Hf, Si, Sn, and Ti.
Materials 11 00592 g014
Materials 11 00592 g015 550
Figure 15. (a) C44 versus VEC and (b) calculated hardness versus VEC of α(Nb,Ti)5Si3.
Figure 15. (a) C44 versus VEC and (b) calculated hardness versus VEC of α(Nb,Ti)5Si3.
Materials 11 00592 g015
Materials 11 00592 g016 550
Figure 16. (a) C44 versus VEC and (b) calculated hardness versus VEC of β(Nb,Ti)5Si3.
Figure 16. (a) C44 versus VEC and (b) calculated hardness versus VEC of β(Nb,Ti)5Si3.
Materials 11 00592 g016
Table
Table 1. Values of the parameters ΔHmix, ΔSmix, valence electron concentration (VEC), δ, Δχ, and Ω for all of the Nb-silicide based alloys and their solid solutions, and for the eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3.
Table 1. Values of the parameters ΔHmix, ΔSmix, valence electron concentration (VEC), δ, Δχ, and Ω for all of the Nb-silicide based alloys and their solid solutions, and for the eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3.
MaterialParameter
ΔHmix
/(kJ/mol)		ΔSmix (J/molK)VECδΔχΩ +
Nb-silicide based alloys [62]−32.7 to –44.88.3–14.74.37–4.98.1–14.30.12–0.2370.57–0.95
Nbss in Nb-silicide based alloys [38]−2 to –15.95.8–14.54.4–5.42.4–9.70.039–0.331
with a gap in the range 0.13 to 0.179		1.55–8.9
Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3−25.5 to –41.94.7–154.33–4.896.23–9.440.118–0.248
with a gap in the range 0.164 to 0.181		0.38–1.35
+ The capital letter Q was used instead of Ω for the ratio TmΔSmix /|ΔHmix|in [38].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsakiropoulos, P. Alloying and Hardness of Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide Based Alloys. Materials 2018, 11, 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040592

AMA Style

Tsakiropoulos P. Alloying and Hardness of Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide Based Alloys. Materials. 2018; 11(4):592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040592

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsakiropoulos, Panos. 2018. "Alloying and Hardness of Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide Based Alloys" Materials 11, no. 4: 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040592

APA Style

Tsakiropoulos, P. (2018). Alloying and Hardness of Eutectics with Nbss and Nb5Si3 in Nb-silicide Based Alloys. Materials, 11(4), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040592

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop