Next Article in Journal
Biohydrogen Fermentation from Sucrose and Piggery Waste with High Levels of Bicarbonate Alkalinity
Next Article in Special Issue
News Media Analysis of Carbon Capture and Storage and Biomass: Perceptions and Possibilities
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Offshore Wind Energy and Extreme Wind Speed Forecasting on the West Coast of Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2015, 8(3), 1701-1715;

A Path Forward for Low Carbon Power from Biomass

Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, the University of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton St., Austin, TX 78712, USA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room E19-370L, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jennie C. Stephens
Received: 15 December 2014 / Revised: 14 January 2015 / Accepted: 9 February 2015 / Published: 27 February 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): Bio-Energy vs Fossil Fuels)
Full-Text   |   PDF [652 KB, uploaded 17 March 2015]   |  


The two major pathways for energy utilization from biomass are conversion to a liquid fuel (i.e., biofuels) or conversion to electricity (i.e., biopower). In the United States (US), biomass policy has focused on biofuels. However, this paper will investigate three options for biopower: low co-firing (co-firing scenarios refer to combusting a given percentage of biomass with coal) (5%–10% biomass), medium co-firing (15%–20% biomass), and dedicated biomass firing (100% biomass). We analyze the economic and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions impact of each of these options, with and without CO2 capture and storage (CCS). Our analysis shows that in the absence of land use change emissions, all biomass co-combustion scenarios result in a decrease in GHG emissions over coal generation alone. The two biggest barriers to biopower are concerns about carbon neutrality of biomass fuels and the high cost compared to today’s electricity prices. This paper recommends two policy actions. First, the need to define sustainability criteria and initiate a certification process so that biomass providers have a fixed set of guidelines to determine whether their feedstocks qualify as renewable energy sources. Second, the need for a consistent, predictable policy that provides the economic incentives to make biopower economically attractive. View Full-Text
Keywords: biomass; CCS; renewable energy; bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS); negative emissions; co-firing biomass; CCS; renewable energy; bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS); negative emissions; co-firing

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cuellar, A.D.; Herzog, H. A Path Forward for Low Carbon Power from Biomass. Energies 2015, 8, 1701-1715.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top