Next Article in Journal
Research on Coordinated Control of Dynamic Reactive Power Sources of DC Blocking and Commutation Failure Transient Overvoltage in New Energy Transmission
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Sustainability Index in Waste-to-Energy Conversion Scenarios Using System Dynamics Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Advancing Polyphenol-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators via pH-Modulated Rapid Synthesis of Tannic Acid–Metal Complexes

1
School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2
Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(9), 2348; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092348
Submission received: 9 April 2025 / Revised: 30 April 2025 / Accepted: 2 May 2025 / Published: 4 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section D3: Nanoenergy)

Abstract

:
Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) are ideal for meeting the global demand for sustainable energy in energy harvesting and wearable electronics. While biomaterials like polysaccharides are well studied in TENGs, the potential of polyphenols and the role of phenolic groups in contact electrification remain underexplored. This study bridges the gap by using tannic acid (TA) to rapidly prepare TA-Fe3+ complex-coated particle films in 1.2 min. Analysis reveals that phenolic hydroxyl groups are strong electron donors, with Fe3+ enhancing electron affinity by restricting their mobility and lowering molecular orbital energy levels. Adjusting the pH to control complex states enables the regulation of triboelectric charging behavior between positive and negative. Investigations into film micromorphology and particle size further optimize performance, with the tris-complex exhibiting negative charging behavior achieving exceptional stability and a high charge density of 92.5 μC·m−2. Additionally, integrating biomaterials into bio-TENGs and exploring the film’s pH and ion sensitivity broaden its applications, demonstrating versatile properties. This study clarifies the triboelectric properties of phenolic groups and proposes methods to regulate charging behavior, offering novel insights for developing biomaterials in TENGs.

1. Introduction

The escalating global demand for sustainable energy solutions and multifunctional materials has catalyzed significant advancements in triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) technology [1,2]. TENGs harness the principles of contact electrification and electrostatic induction to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy, positioning them as versatile tools for applications such as energy harvesting and wearable electronics [3,4,5]. Biomaterials, characterized by their excellent biocompatibility, sustainability, and environmental friendliness, have emerged as a pivotal trend in the future development of TENGs [6,7]. However, research on triboelectric biomaterials has predominantly focused on polysaccharides such as cellulose, lignin, and chitosan due to their abundant availability and ease of modification [8,9,10]. It is suggested that more efforts should be devoted to exploring a broader variety of biomaterials to enhance their versatility and adaptability in TENGs. Polyphenols are diverse, naturally occurring plant compounds with multiple phenol (phenyl bonded to hydroxyl groups) units, known for their antioxidant properties and versatile in catalysis, drug delivery, water purification, and biomedical coatings [11]. However, their use in TENGs remains limited; they are primarily used as hydrogel components for cross-linking or adhesion, with minimal impact on triboelectric performance and insufficient exploration of their properties [12,13,14,15].
Studies have consistently demonstrated that the chemical structures of materials are crucial in governing contact electrification [16,17,18,19,20]. Modifying polymers by grafting various atom-level functional groups onto their surfaces significantly influences electron affinity and the charge transfer process [21]. The incorporation of fluorine-containing groups has been shown to regulate charge generation [22], while adjusting the dihedral angles of adjacent conjugated planes within polymers affects charge separation and accumulation [23]. Additionally, introducing phthalazinone moieties into polymers results in substantial ranking shifts in triboelectric series [24]. Furthermore, changes in surface chemical composition induced by crystallization behavior can modify the triboelectric characteristics of materials [25,26]. Building upon these foundational studies, in-depth research on chemical structures is essential for optimizing triboelectric properties and driving material innovation [27,28]. Polyphenols, with their high density of phenolic groups, facilitate electron transfer and enable tunable chemical reactions through hydrogen bonding and charge interactions [29,30], making them theoretically suitable for regulating triboelectric properties. However, the role of phenolic groups in contact electrification remains insufficiently understood, underscoring a significant application gap.
Tannic acid (TA), a predominant polyphenol composed of gallic acid units esterified onto a glucose core and rich in phenolic groups [31], is an ideal candidate for such studies. However, due to its small molecular size, it is difficult to form large-scale and structurally stable assemblies. This limitation can be addressed by coordinating TA with metal ions, which induces a robust cross-linked network [32,33]. The resulting stabilized material offers an excellent platform for investigating the impact of phenolic groups on triboelectric properties. Further efforts are needed to optimize triboelectric performance based on the density and distribution of phenolic groups and by improving material stability. Additionally, deeper investigation is required to elucidate the effect of metal ions on phenolic groups’ electron affinity and charge transfer mechanisms.
In this study, a rapid preparation strategy for producing TA-Fe3+ complex-coated particle (TP) films is presented, achieving an impressive preparation time of just 1.2 min. The analysis and experiments demonstrate that phenolic hydroxyl groups have strong electron-donating capacity, and introducing Fe3+ enhances electron affinity by restricting their mobility through coordination bonds and lowering molecular orbital energy levels. By adjusting the pH to control the complex states of TA and Fe3+, the resulting coordination network regulates electron transfer, enabling positive triboelectric charging behavior (which tends to lose electrons, becoming positively charged) to negative triboelectric charging behavior (which tends to gain electrons, becoming negatively charged). Under alkaline conditions, an optimally thick tris-complex film coated with 0.5 μm particles exhibits negative charging behavior, exceptional stability, and a high charge density of 92.5 μC·m−2. Furthermore, integration with biomaterials such as chitosan constructs bio-TENGs with an output of 37.5 μC·m−2, providing eco-friendly and versatile energy solutions. Beyond energy harvesting, TP films demonstrate multifunctionality with pH and ion sensitivity, highlighting their potential as efficient sweat sensors for health monitoring applications. This study elucidates the triboelectric properties of phenolic groups and offers strategies for regulating triboelectric charging behavior, while the rapid TA-based preparation method provides new insights into the development of biomaterials for TENGs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

TA and FeCl3·6H2O were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. PS particles were purchased from Haian Zhichuan battery material Technology Co., Ltd., Haian, China. All the chemicals were used without any additional pre-treatment.

2.2. Preparation of TP Triboelectric Films

FeCl3·6H2O solution (100 μL, 10 mg mL−1, pH 1) was added to the aqueous polystyrene (PS) particle suspension (200 μL, 50 mg mL−1) and thoroughly mixed. Subsequently, TA solution (200 μL, 10 mg mL−1, pH 5.5) was added and thoroughly mixed, resulting in the following final concentrations: the concentration of PS was adjusted to 20 mg mL−1, while that of FeCl3·6H2O reached 2.0 mg mL−1, and TA was present at 4.0 mg mL−1. The mixing process was carried out using a vortex mixer for 10 s. Next, the pH of the suspension was adjusted to 2.5, 5.5, or 9.5 using NaOH solution to regulate the coordination state of TA-Fe3+ complexes. Finally, 50 μL of the adjusted solution is evenly dispersed onto the surface of a 2 × 2 cm2 indium tin oxide/polyethylene terephthalate (ITO/PET) substrate and allowed to dry under ambient conditions at room temperature for 10 min.

2.3. Preparation of Layer-by-Layer (LbL) Cyclic Coating Triboelectric Films

The ITO/PET substrate was placed into a Petri dish, followed by the injection of aqueous solution of FeCl3·6H2O (10 mL, 4.0 mg mL−1, pH 1) into the dish. Following adsorption for 1 min, TA solution (10 mL, 8.0 mg mL−1, pH 5.5) was then injected into the dish. The solution was homogenously mixed, and its pH was adjusted to 2.5, 5.5, and 9.5 using NaOH solution. Subsequently, the mixture was left undisturbed for 3 min to allow for sufficient adsorption. After that, it was washed with deionized water three times to remove unbound substances or impurities. This process was repeated multiple times as experimentally needed (e.g., one to twelve times) before drying.

2.4. Characterization

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Kalpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with an Al Kα excitation (1486.8 eV) was used to analyze surface chemical element composition. Kelvin probe force microscope (KPFM, Bruker Dimension Icon, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) measurements were subsequently performed using a conductive probe in tapping mode to analyze the relative surface potential of different triboelectric materials. The structural stability of the samples was evaluated through ultraviolet–visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy adsorption analysis, which was carried out on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer lambda 750, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The morphology image was investigated using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6010, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The thickness of the coating film on the substrate was measured using an ellipsometry spectrometer (JA Woollam M-2000v, J. A. Woollam Co., Lincoln, NE, USA) with the laser wavelength tuned to the 300–1700 nm range. The thickness and morphology of the coating film on the particle were acquired using a transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM 2100F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A pneumatic cylinder (AirTAC TN20-50S, AirTAC International Group, Taichung, Taiwan) was used to apply a periodic contact-separation process to the TENG at stable frequency and force. The working frequency was regulated via a programmable solenoid valve, which periodically modulated the airflow to drive the piston motion at the desired rate. Electrical measurements were conducted using a charge amplifier (Kistler 5015A, Kistler Group, Winterthur, Switzerland) for transfer charge measurements and a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix MDO 3104, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA) for voltage and current measurements. Each parameter was measured five times repeatedly to ensure the repeatability of the experimental results. The measurement setup for evaluating the TENG’s charge density, open-circuit voltage, and short-circuit current is schematically illustrated in Figure S1.

2.5. Structural Stability Measurement

To evaluate the material’ structural stability in a humid environment, the samples were immersed in deionized water for 2 h. The changes in absorbance before and after immersion were measured using a UV-vis spectrophotometer. The structural stability was calculated by
S t r u c t u r a l   s t a b i l i t y = A 2 A 1 × 100 %
where A 1 and A 2 are the absorbance at 276 nm before and after sample immersion, respectively (n = 3).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Prepared Chitosan Films

The proposed rapid preparation strategy offered a simple and efficient approach to producing TA-Fe3+ complex-coated particle (TP)-deposited films in two steps (Figure 1a). First, Fe3+ and TA were sequentially added to a PS suspension at a specific ratio and thoroughly mixed. This mixture formed TA-Fe3+ complexes that coated the PS particles (D = 0.5 μm), creating core–shell structures. These particles were then deposited onto an ITO/PET substrate that had been soaked in a solution of FeCl3·6H2O, resulting in TP films. Remarkably, these processes were completed within 1.2 min, demonstrating high time efficiency (Figure S2). Additionally, the complex state between TA and Fe3+ was highly dependent on the pH of the solution, which affected the deprotonation of phenolic -OH groups in TA and their ability to bind with Fe3+. As shown in Figure 1b, TA, a polyphenolic compound, could form a mono-, bis-, or tris-complex state with Fe3+. At pH < 3, the protonation of -OH groups inhibited coordination, favoring a mono-complex state. As the pH rose to between 3 and 6, deprotonation allowed for bis-complex formation, while at pH > 7, the tris-type complex dominated. These complex states significantly affected the key properties of the films, such as surface chemical characteristics, electron affinity, and stability, which in turn influenced their triboelectric performance.
XPS was employed to characterize the surface elemental composition of the mono-complex TP (MTP), bis-complex TP (BTP), and tris-complex TP (TTP) films. As shown in Figure 1c, the appearance of a characteristic Fe 2p peak at approximately 711 eV confirmed the successful incorporation of Fe3+ into these TPs. To elucidate the triboelectric performance, a 2 × 2 cm2 TENG was fabricated using TP films paired with common triboelectric materials, including polyamide (PA), thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), aluminum (Al), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), commercial polyimide (Kapton), polytetrafluoroethylene (PDMS), and fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP). As shown in Figure 1d, the relative positive or negative charge signals indicate the triboelectric charging behavior of TP upon contact with different materials. When the charge signal was positive, TP accepted electrons (Figure S3a); conversely, when it was negative, it donated electrons (Figure S3b). Therefore, the triboelectric polarity of three TPs were reflected in the positions of the triboelectric series (Figure 1e). MTP was located between TPU and PA, BTP between PET and Al, and TTP between Kapton and PDMS. MTP exhibited positive triboelectric polarity, indicating its tendency to donate electrons, while BTP showed intermediate polarity, and TTP displayed the most negative polarity, demonstrating its strong electron-withdrawing capability. The maximum charge transfer densities also varied significantly, with MTP reaching 31.7 μC·m−2 when paired with FEP, BTP achieving 63.4 μC·m−2 when paired with PA, and TTP exhibiting the highest output of 92.5 μC·m−2 when paired with PA.
To understand the underlying factors influencing these triboelectric properties, KPFM was employed to measure the surface potential of three TPs (Figure 1f). The results show surface potential values of 0.125 V, −0.343 V, and −0.712 V for MTP, BTP, and TTP, respectively. A lower surface potential corresponds to a higher work function, indicating a material’s stronger ability to accept electrons. This trend aligned with the observed triboelectric series positions, where TTP, with the lowest surface potential, exhibited the highest electron affinity and most negative polarity, followed by BTP and MTP. The variation in work function and electron affinity across the three complexes further emphasizes their differences in electron-accepting ability and triboelectric polarity. MTP, with fewer coordinated -OH groups, retained a higher density of uncoordinated electron-donating sites, resulting in its positive triboelectric charging behavior. In contrast, the higher degree of cross-linking in BTP and TTP led to the delocalization of electron density and a reduction in free -OH groups, enhancing their electron affinity and resulting in negative charging behavior. The strong electron-withdrawing behavior of TTP made it particularly suitable for applications requiring high charge transfer efficiency.

3.2. Triboelectric Properties and Influence of TA

To further investigate the impact of complex states between TA and Fe3+ on the electron density and triboelectric properties of TPs, density functional theory (DFT) was used to calculate the electrostatic potential map of TA. As shown in Figure 2a, the blue area represents positive potential, and the red area represents negative potential, corresponding to the electron-deficient region and the electron-rich region, respectively. Notably, the -OH groups exhibited electron-donating ability, while the phenyl groups demonstrated relatively weak electron-withdrawing ability. In the mono-complex state, each Fe3+ coordinated with a single TA molecule, resulting in a less cross-linked network with abundant uncoordinated phenolic -OH groups. These uncoordinated -OH groups retained their strong electron-donating ability, making the material more prone to losing electrons. Consequently, MTP exhibited positive triboelectric charging behavior. As the coordination progressed to the tris-complex state, each Fe3+ coordinated with three TA molecules. This resulted in a densely cross-linked network that delocalized electron density and reduced the availability of free -OH groups, restricting their electron-donating capabilities. This delocalization enhanced the material’s electron affinity, making it more inclined to accept electrons during triboelectric interactions. Therefore, TTP exhibited negative triboelectric charging behavior.
In the absence of Fe3+, deprotonated TA undergoes oxidative self-polymerization to form poly(tannic acid) (PTA), as illustrated in Figure S4. In this process, the deprotonated TA molecules transformed into quinone structures, which then polymerized [34,35]. Further energy level analysis (Figure 2b) showed the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy level of TA, PTA, and TA-Fe3+ calculated by DFT simulation. Specifically, all calculations were performed using Gaussian 09 software with the B3LYP functional and the 6-31G(d) basis set. Notably, the LUMO level of TA-Fe3+ was lower (−3.12 eV) than that of TA (1.68 eV) and PTA (−2.23 eV) (Figure 2c). The LUMO, which is the electron acceptor orbital of materials, has a lower energy level, indicating higher electron affinity and facilitating electron transfer from materials with a higher HOMO level upon contact [23,36,37,38]. In triboelectric terms, electrons preferentially transferred from the pair material (e.g., PA) to PTA or TTP, as depicted in Figure 2d. Using paper as a supporting substrate, it was soaked in TA solution and then dried to obtain the triboelectric film of PTA. Triboelectric tests demonstrated that PTA shifted the triboelectric polarity of paper toward a negative state (Figure S5), indicating the successful preparation of PTA and its electron-withdrawing behavior. However, compared to PTA, TTP exhibited stronger electron-withdrawing capability and higher triboelectric output performance (Figure 2e). These results indicate that the introduction of Fe3+ not only restricted the mobility of electron-donating -OH groups by forming coordination bonds but also lowered the LUMO energy level, resulting in TTP’s negative tendency that has stronger electron affinity.
In addition to influencing triboelectric properties, the complex morphology formed by Fe3+ and TA significantly enhanced the structural stability of TTP. From the deconvoluted O 1s XPS spectra (Figure 2f; Figure S6), peaks appearing at approximately 531.2 eV and 533.0 eV were assigned to Fe-O and Fe-OH species, respectively. The Fe-O peak arose from the coordination between TA and Fe3+, as previously reported [33,39]. A higher proportion of Fe-O groups indicated a more stable complex state because these bonds strengthened the network structure of the material. In the case of TTP, with a 72.3% Fe-O proportion (Table S1), the material exhibited enhanced stability due to the densely cross-linked network. To evaluate this stability, materials deposited with the three types of complexes are immersed in water for 2 h. The intensity of the ultraviolet absorption peak at 276 nm in the aqueous solution was measured to determine the amount of material that had dissolved or detached from the substrate. By comparing the absorbance with that of a standard solution, structural stability was calculated accordingly. The characteristic absorption curves of standard solutions at different concentrations are presented in Figure S7. As shown in Figure 2g, TTP demonstrated a stability of approximately 96.8%, which signifies exceptional stability. This high stability was attributed to the higher density of the cross-linked network in TTP, which resisted dissolution and degradation in aqueous environments. Therefore, the complexation between TA and Fe3+ played a crucial role in determining the triboelectric properties and structural stability of TPs. Progressing from a mono- to tris-complex state enhanced cross-linking and increased electron affinity, inducing a shift from positive to negative triboelectric charging behavior. Additionally, a cyclic durability test was conducted to assess the long-term electrical stability of the three TP-based TENGs. As shown in Figure S8, each TENG endured 2500 continuous contact–separation cycles under 1 Hz, during which the output signals remained effectively unchanged. These results confirm the robustness and practical reliability of the TENGs under prolonged operation.
However, the long-term stability of TA-Fe3+ complexes under ambient or humid conditions may be affected due to the reversible nature of phenolic–metal coordination, potential hydrolysis, or competitive binding with environmental ions, leading to degraded triboelectric performance. To address this, future improvements may be achieved through cross-linking stabilization or surface encapsulation strategies to enhance environmental durability. Moreover, although the TP method allows rapid and uniform film formation at the laboratory scale, scaling it up to large-area or continuous production may pose challenges in ensuring consistent particle distribution, coordination control, and film adhesion. As a potential solution, the TP process could be integrated with scalable techniques such as spray coating or 3D bioprinting to facilitate large-area production and versatile device integration.

3.3. Micromorphology and High Performance of TTP

The surface morphology of TPs with different complex states was also characterized by utilizing SEM (Figure 3a). It was shown that BTP and TTP were completely coated with the TA-Fe3+ films, whereas MTP exhibited incomplete coverage, suggesting a weaker binding affinity in the mono-complex state. This incomplete surface was correlated with the relatively poorer triboelectric performance observed in MTP. Moreover, BTP and TTP had distinctly thicker films coupled with a denser cross-linked network. TEM confirmed the formation of a continuous TA-Fe3+ film fully enveloping the surface of TTP (Figure S9), verifying the successful creation of the coating layer essential for surface integrity and functionality. Additionally, the thickness of TA-Fe3+ films was determined by direct measurement on the high-resolution TEM images of TPs, as illustrated in Figure 3b and Figure S10. The measured thicknesses were 9.0 ± 2.3 nm, 18.7 ± 3.2 nm, and 23.6 ± 1.7 nm for MTP, BTP, and TTP, respectively (Figure 3c). To explore the effect of the Fe3+-to-TA ratio on film thickness, the FeCl3·6H2O concentration was varied, resulting in an increase in film thickness from 13.8 ± 1.6 nm to 23.6 ± 1.7 nm (Figure 3d). Saturation was reached at three molar equivalents of TA (2.0 mg mL−1 [FeCl3·6H2O]), beyond which a further increase in Fe3+ did not increase the thickness. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) further demonstrated the uniform dispersion of Fe3+ on the TP surfaces (Figure S11). All three TPs exhibited a comparable Fe3+ content, at approximately 0.4%, indicating consistent metal incorporation across the complexes.
TTPs were fabricated using PS particles of various sizes (0.1 μm, 0.2 μm, 0.5 μm, 1 μm, and 2 μm) for comparative analysis, with the triboelectric performance evaluated through contact with PA. Among these, the 0.5 μm diameter particle used in this study exhibited the highest charge transfer of 92.5 μC·m−2 (Figure 3e). This optimized performance may be attributed to balanced coated area, density, and suitable particle size, which enhance contact area and charge induction during triboelectric interactions. The electrical output properties of the TTP-PA pair were analyzed across various frequencies and areas, as illustrated in Figure S12. The short-circuit current density ( J S C ) increased steadily from 8.6 mA·m−2 to 22.7 mA·m−2 as the frequency rose from 1 Hz to 3 Hz, attributed to a higher rate of charge transfer events. Additionally, the open-circuit voltage ( V O C ) increased with larger contact areas, reaching output voltages of 104 V to 157 V for contact areas of 1 × 1 cm2 to 3 × 3 cm2, respectively. Building on this high performance, the relationship between the instantaneous peak power density and external resistance of the TTP-TENG was examined under 1 Hz (Figure 3f), with the circuit configuration illustrated in Figure S13. In this setup, the TENG was directly connected to the external load, and the output voltage ( V R ) across the load was monitored using an oscilloscope. It should be noted that this measured voltage represents the load voltage rather than the open-circuit voltage. The results show a maximum instantaneous power density of 533.7 mW·m−2 under an external resistance of 40 MΩ. To demonstrate the availability of the TENG, the device was integrated with a full-wave bridge rectifier to charge various aluminum electrolytic capacitors (the circuit diagram is illustrated in Figure S14). As shown in Figure 3g, a 2 × 2 cm2 TENG operating at a frequency of 2 Hz charged a 0.47 μF capacitor to 5 V in 15 s and another 0.47 μF capacitor in 62 s. Additionally, a 1.0 μF capacitor reached 4 V in 100 s. These results demonstrate the outstanding capability of TTP for efficient energy harvesting and storage, suggesting its potential for practical applications in low-power electronic devices.
The potential of TTP paired with other biomaterials to construct bio-TENGs was also explored to advance sustainable green energy harvesting technologies. Three bio-based films, including gelatin, chitosan, and sodium alginate, were employed to make contact with TTP, and their effectiveness regarding triboelectric performance was evaluated, leveraging their known positive triboelectric polarity [40]. Among the three bio-TENGs, the TTP–chitosan pair exhibited the highest transfer charge density of 37.5 μC·m−2, surpassing both the gelatin and sodium alginate counterparts (Figure 3h). This enhanced performance may be attributed to chitosan’s unique amine groups, which facilitate more efficient charge transfer and accumulation during contact electrifications. Further analysis revealed that the TTP–gelatin, TTP–chitosan, and TTP–sodium alginate pairs achieved power outputs of 74.5 mW·m−2, 228.9 mW·m−2, and 175.2 mW·m−2, respectively (Figure 3i). The TTP–chitosan pair exhibited the highest power output, aligning with charge density tests. To demonstrate availability, a 5 × 5 cm2 TTP–chitosan TENG was constructed and successfully powered 120 LEDs connected in series (Figure 3j). This demonstration validated the laboratory-scale performance and feasibility of integrating bio-TENGs into practical energy solutions. The biological advantages of biomaterial-based components enhance their appeal, making bio-TENGs ideal for green energy and medical applications that require compatibility with living tissues and minimal environmental impact.

3.4. Rapid TP Preparation with High Time Efficiency

In the quest for advancing TENG technologies, fast preparation emerges as a critical factor that can significantly impact the practicality of TENGs. To demonstrate the advantages of the TP method in terms of time efficiency, the LbL method was utilized for comparison purposes. Leveraging the strong surface affinity of the phenolic groups, TA-Fe3+ films were directly deposited onto ITO/PET substrates through sequential immersion. The preparation process for the cyclic coating method is schematically illustrated in Figure S15, while the growth process of the coating films is shown in Figure 4a. In this method, the substrate was alternately immersed in Fe3+ and TA solutions for several minutes per cycle, repeatedly producing TA-Fe3+ films with varying thicknesses. The SEM images (Figure 4b) indicate that the coating surface remained compact and continuous for up to eight cycles. Beyond twelve cycles, the top layer became porous and uneven, with visible particulate matter, indicating a deterioration in structural integrity.
An XPS analysis (Figure S16) suggested that the LbL films possessed a comparable surface chemical composition between TP films. As shown in Figure 4c, ellipsometry measurements revealed that the film thickness increased significantly during the initial cycles, with each modification adding approximately 15 nm, reaching a total thickness of about 125 nm after eight cycles. After that, the structure exhibited increased porosity, which diminished the efficiency of subsequent layering and adversely affected film quality. Furthermore, PA was employed to make contact with LbL film to characterize its triboelectric performance. As shown in Figure 4d, increasing the coating thickness enhanced the transfer charge density, reaching approximately 45.6 μC·m−2 at the eighth cycle. However, exceeding eight cycles led to performance declines due to increased looseness and porosity in the upper layers. During contact–separation processes, loose particles could detach and adhere to the counter material, negatively impacting output performance and stability. Structural stability tests (Figure 4e) confirmed that it was significantly decreased after eight cycles, as more unstable complexes on the surface became prone to detachment and dissolution in water, reducing stability and durability. Consequently, an eight-cycle number yielded good structural stability and optimal output performance for the LbL method.
To evaluate the triboelectric performance of the TP strategy against the LbL method, the triboelectric outputs of both TP and LbL (eight cycles) films across three complex states were compared, alongside pristine ITO/PET and PS-modified ITO/PET films (Figure 4f). Notably, films prepared using the TP method in each complex state demonstrated significantly higher output performance than those prepared using the LbL method, with TTP achieving the highest transfer charge density. Although both methods produced films with similar chemical compositions, which exhibited the same triboelectric polarity, the TP method outperformed the LbL method in triboelectric performance. This was attributed to the fact that triboelectric performance is affected not only by the difference in triboelectric polarity but also by the internal dielectric properties of the materials [16,27]. LbL films were limited to increasing the coating thickness beyond 150 nm without compromising structural stability, which prevented them from achieving ideal dielectric properties. In contrast, the TP method achieved optimal dielectric properties and stability by selecting appropriate PS particle sizes, resulting in superior triboelectric output.
The TP method significantly enhanced producing efficiency, reducing the preparation time from approximately 40 min with the LbL method to just 1.2 min (Figure 4g). This comparison reflects the theoretical minimum preparation time for each method, calculated based on standardized procedural steps and expected operation durations. This substantial reduction in time enhances productivity and lowers operational costs, highlighting its practical advantages. Moreover, the TP method rapidly produced stable, high-performance films, enabling innovative applications in sustainable energy harvesting and wearable electronics. Importantly, by tuning the polyphenol or metal ion, the TP strategy can be extended to diverse polyphenol–metal coordination systems, thereby enabling precise customization of the resulting complexes’ triboelectric properties. The compositional diversity revealed in this study offers a promising route for tailoring triboelectric biomaterials to specific applications and underpins the creation of multifunctional sensing platforms for varied physiological and environmental monitoring demands. Moreover, the intrinsic biocompatibility and microporous coating architecture of these coordination systems facilitate their integration with triboelectric and microelectronic devices, enabling stimuli-responsive in vivo drug delivery with exact spatial and temporal control and providing minimally invasive platforms for advanced therapeutic interventions and real-time physiological monitoring.

3.5. Application of TTP on pH and Ion Sensitivity

In addition to its bio-TENG application, the significant pH sensitivity of TTP makes it an effective and versatile pH sensor. This sensitivity arises from the protonation and deprotonation of the phenolic -OH groups in TA, which alter the material’s triboelectric polarity under different pH conditions. To evaluate this property, TTP was wetted with solutions of varying pH levels, and the transfer charge was measured after the films dried. As shown in Figure 5a, the transfer charge gradually increased as the pH increased from 4 to 9. This linear increase indicated a direct correlation between the pH level and the electrical signal generated by TTP, demonstrating their potential for pH sensing applications. Moreover, TTP also functioned effectively as an ion sensor due to its ability to interact with various ionic species. Specifically, it displayed a linear response to Na+ concentrations ranging from 0 to 250 mM, as illustrated in Figure 5b. This concentration range encompassed the typical Na+ levels found in human sweat [41], making TTP particularly suitable for monitoring electrolyte balance in physiological conditions. The response times of the sensor were approximately 40 ms and 60 ms, respectively, during the contact and separation process (Figure 5c). This rapid response is crucial for applications requiring immediate feedback, such as athletic performance monitoring or medical diagnostics. However, the dual sensitivity of TTP to both pH and ionic concentration posed challenges when attempting to measure one parameter in environments where both variables fluctuate simultaneously, such as human sweat. In such complex environments, it became difficult to isolate the influence of pH from that of ion concentration on the sensor’s electrical output, potentially leading to inaccurate readings.
To address the challenge of ion interference in pH sensing, a modified version of the TTP sensor was developed by saturating its surfaces with Fe3+, resulting in Fe3+-loaded TTP. This strategic modification was designed to eliminate the confounding effects of Na+ while preserving the sensor’s sensitivity to pH changes. The modification process involved coordinating Fe3+ with the TA molecules, occupying the binding sites that would typically interact with Na+. Thus, the Fe3+-loaded TTP sensor remained selective to pH variations, unaffected by Na+ concentration changes, as demonstrated in Figure 5d. Human sweat typically maintains a pH range between 4.5 and 7.0, categorizing it as slightly acidic [42]. The Fe3+-loaded TTP sensor could effectively detect pH changes within this range. Figure 5e demonstrated that the sensor maintained consistent pH sensitivity across varying concentrations of Na+, ensuring reliable performance in real-world conditions where electrolyte concentrations can fluctuate significantly. Through a thoughtful and integrated design, the pH and ion sensors developed in this study offer the potential to create highly efficient sweat sensors essential for health monitoring. Changes in sweat can serve as indicators of dehydration levels, electrolyte disparities, or metabolic syndrome like diabetes (Figure 5f). The accurate TTP sensor enables early detection and management of these conditions. It is simple: a flexible design fits into wearables such as smart textiles or wristbands, allowing for non-invasive, continuous monitoring while enhancing comfort and user compliance.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a rapid and efficient method to prepare TA-Fe3+ complex-coated particle films was presented, addressing the limited application of polyphenols in TENGs. The preparation process was remarkably swift, requiring only 1.2 min, making it significantly faster than the LbL method, which requires approximately 40 min. The addition of Fe3+ enhanced the electron affinity of phenolic groups, thereby regulating charge transfer and improving structural stability. By adjusting the pH to control complex states, the triboelectric charging behavior was regulated between positive and negative. TTP with 0.5 μm particles achieved a high charge density of 92.5 μC·m−2, surpassing that achieved using the LbL method and demonstrating exceptional structural stability. Moreover, integrating chitosan into a bio-TENG provided eco-friendly energy solutions with a charge density of 37.5 μC·m−2, as demonstrated by a 5 × 5 cm2 TENG lighting 120 LEDs. The demonstrated pH and ion sensitivity of the TP films further highlight their potential for advanced applications, such as efficient sweat sensors for health monitoring. In conclusion, this study presents a rapid, tunable strategy for fabricating high-performance bio-based TENGs via phenolic–metal coordination. Beyond improving triboelectric outputs, this approach offers a versatile platform for expanding material design and sensor functionality in sustainable energy and wearable electronics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en18092348/s1: Figure S1: Measurement setup for evaluating TENG electrical parameters under pneumatic actuation. Figure S2: Preparation procedure for rapid assembly of TPs and their deposition on ITO/PET substrate. Figure S3: (a) A relative positive charge signal indicates that TPs accept electrons. (b) A relative negative charge signal indicates that TPs donate electrons. Figure S4: Schematic illustration of oxidative self-polymerization of TA. Figure S5: Ranking in triboelectric series of paper and PTA. Figure S6: O 1s XPS spectra of MTP and BTP. Figure S7: Ultraviolet to visible absorption curves of standard solution at different concentrations. Figure S8: Long-term electrical stability test of three TP-based TENGs with 2500 continuous operation cycles. Figure S9: Surface morphology of TTP by TEM. Scale bar is 100 nm. Figure S10: Thickness of TA-Fe3+ film on MTP and BTP was measured by high-resolution TEM. Black lines serve as reference marks for assessing film thickness. Scale bar: 10 nm. Figure S11: EDS mapping of three types of TP and corresponding elemental distributions of C, O, and Fe. Figure S12: (a) Short-circuit current density of TTP-TENG under various measurement frequencies. (b) Open-circuit voltage measured on TTP-TENG with various areas ranging from 1 × 1 cm2 to 3 × 3 cm2. Figure S13: Circuit diagram for measuring instantaneous peak power density of TTP-TENG under various load resistances. Figure S14: Circuit diagram of charging capacitor. Figure S15: Preparation of TA-Fe3+ coating film through LbL method. Figure S16: XPS spectra of TA-Fe3+ coating film through LbL method. Table S1: Summary of content of combined state of various O 1s in MTP, BTP, and TTP measured by XPS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.F.; Methodology, Z.F.; Investigation, Z.F.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Z.F.; Writing—Review and Editing, X.G. and J.H.; Supervision, X.G. and J.H.; Project Administration, X.G. and J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. U2230204, and the International Cooperation Project of Ningbo City, No. 2023H018. Their support is gratefully acknowledged.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cheng, T.; Shao, J.; Wang, Z. Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2023, 3, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, H.; Shan, C.; Fu, S.; Li, K.; Wang, J.; Xu, S.; Li, G.; Zhao, Q.; Guo, H.; Hu, C. Efficient Energy Conversion Mechanism and Energy Storage Strategy for Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Choi, D.; Lee, Y.; Lin, Z.-H.; Cho, S.; Kim, M.; Ao, C.K.; Soh, S.; Sohn, C.; Jeong, C.K.; Lee, J.; et al. Recent Advances in Triboelectric Nanogenerators: From Technological Progress to Commercial Applications. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 11087–11219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cao, X.; Xiong, Y.; Sun, J.; Xie, X.; Sun, Q.; Wang, Z. Multidiscipline Applications of Triboelectric Nanogenerators for the Intelligent Era of Internet of Things. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, S.; Chi, M.; Mo, J.; Liu, T.; Liu, Y.; Fu, Q.; Wang, J.; Luo, B.; Qin, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. Bioinspired Asymmetric Amphiphilic Surface for Triboelectric Enhanced Efficient Water Harvesting. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.L. Biopolymer and Biomimetic Techniques for Triboelectric Nanogenerators (TENGs). Adv. Mater. 2024, 2409440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Z.; Yu, A.; Zhai, J.; Wang, Z.L. Sustainable Biopolymers in Eco-Friendly Triboelectric Energy Harvesting. Adv. Mater. 2024, 2412671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, H.; Nong, X.; Zhang, P.; Xu, Y.; Chen, J.; Yu, F.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, X.; Wang, S.; Nie, S.; et al. Multiscale Confinement-Modulated Cellulosic Dielectric Materials for Energy Harvesting and Self-Powered Devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 35, 2417509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, W.; Zhang, W.; Xu, Y.; Wang, G.; Xu, T.; Nie, S.; Si, C. Lignin-Derived Materials for Triboelectric Nanogenerators with Emphasis on Lignin Multifunctionality. Nano Energy 2024, 128, 109912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Ren, Z.; Luo, J.; Zhang, C.; Cao, C.; Yuan, H.; Pang, Y. Marine Biomaterial-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators: Insights and Applications. Nano Energy 2024, 119, 109046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guo, Y.; Sun, Q.; Wu, F.-G.; Dai, Y.; Chen, X. Polyphenol-Containing Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Properties, and Therapeutic Delivery. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, H.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Xi, G.; Mao, R.; Ma, Y.; Wang, D.; Tang, M.; Xu, Z.; Luan, H. Ultrastretchable, Self-Healing Conductive Hydrogel-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Human–Computer Interaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 5128–5138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bagchi, B.; Datta, P.; Fernandez, C.S.; Xu, L.; Gupta, P.; Huang, W.; David, A.L.; Siassakos, D.; Homer-Vanniasinkam, S.; Tiwari, M.K. A Stretchable, Self-Healing and Semi-Transparent Nanogenerator for Energy Harvesting and Sensing. Nano Energy 2023, 107, 108127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, H.; Xue, K.; Xu, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, B.; Shao, C.; Sun, R. Green and Low-Cost Alkali-Polyphenol Synergetic Self-Catalysis System Access to Fast Gelation of Self-Healable and Self-Adhesive Conductive Hydrogels for Self-Powered Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Small 2024, 20, 2305502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, M.; Luo, Y.; Yang, Q.; Duan, T.; Tang, Z.; Xu, L.; Li, N.; Xu, J. Tough and Adhesive Conductive Hydrogels with Fast Gelation from a Polyphenol–Aluminium Ion Dual Self-Catalysis System for Wearable Strain Sensors and Triboelectric Nanogenerators. J. Mater. Chem. C 2024, 12, 16872–16880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, P.; He, X.; Dai, G.; Zheng, H.; Chen, C.; Wang, A.C.; Xu, C.; et al. Quantifying the Triboelectric Series. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tao, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.L. Design and Synthesis of Triboelectric Polymers for High Performance Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Energy Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 3654–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tao, X.; Yang, P.; Liu, Z.; Qin, S.; Hu, J.; Huang, Z.-X.; Chen, X.; Qu, J.-P. Acid-Doped Pyridine-Based Polybenzimidazole as a Positive Triboelectric Material with Superior Charge Retention Capability. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 4467–4477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.; Xu, S.; Hu, C. Charge Generation and Enhancement of Key Components of Triboelectric Nanogenerators: A Review. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2409833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fang, Z.; Guan, X.; He, J. Effectively Altering the Triboelectric Charging Behavior of Chitosan Films via Tannic Acid Surface Modification. Nano Energy 2025, 133, 110498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shin, S.-H.; Bae, Y.E.; Moon, H.K.; Kim, J.; Choi, S.-H.; Kim, Y.; Yoon, H.J.; Lee, M.H.; Nah, J. Formation of Triboelectric Series via Atomic-Level Surface Functionalization for Triboelectric Energy Harvesting. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 6131–6138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Tao, X.; He, H.; Chen, F.; Huang, Z.-X.; Wang, Z.L.; Chen, X.; Qu, J.-P. Fabrication of Triboelectric Polymer Films via Repeated Rheological Forging for Ultrahigh Surface Charge Density. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, S.; Tao, X.; Liu, Z.; Wu, H.; Guan, Z.; Liu, L.; Li, J.; Chen, X.; Ou-Yang, W. Regulation of Dihedral Angle on Molecular Engineering for Enhancing Triboelectric Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2405443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tao, X.; Fu, S.; Li, S.; Liu, Z.; Yang, P.; Liu, C.; Lin, S.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Jian, X.; et al. Large and Tunable Ranking Shift in Triboelectric Series of Polymers by Introducing Phthalazinone Moieties. Small Methods 2023, 7, 2201593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Z.; Li, S.; Lin, S.; Shi, Y.; Yang, P.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.L. Crystallization-Induced Shift in a Triboelectric Series and Even Polarity Reversal for Elastic Triboelectric Materials. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 4074–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fang, Z.; Lou, W.; Zhang, W.; Guan, X.; He, J.; Lin, J. Modulating Crystallinity and Dielectric Constant of Chitosan Film for Triboelectric Polarity Shift and Performance Enhancement in Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2023, 117, 108923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, R.; Olin, H. Material Choices for Triboelectric Nanogenerators: A Critical Review. EcoMat 2020, 2, e12062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, J.; Iwamoto, M.; Chen, X. A Review of Contact Electrification at Diversified Interfaces and Related Applications on Triboelectric Nanogenerator. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 16, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jakobek, L. Interactions of Polyphenols with Carbohydrates, Lipids and Proteins. Food Chem. 2015, 175, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Q.; Xiao, X.; Lu, L.; Ai, L.; Xu, M.; Liu, Y.; Goff, H.D. Polyphenol–Polysaccharide Complex: Preparation, Characterization, and Potential Utilization in Food and Health. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 13, 59–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yan, W.; Shi, M.; Dong, C.; Liu, L.; Gao, C. Applications of Tannic Acid in Membrane Technologies: A Review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 284, 102267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ejima, H.; Richardson, J.J.; Liang, K.; Best, J.P.; Van Koeverden, M.P.; Such, G.K.; Cui, J.; Caruso, F. One-Step Assembly of Coordination Complexes for Versatile Film and Particle Engineering. Science 2013, 341, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rahim, M.A.; Ejima, H.; Cho, K.L.; Kempe, K.; Müllner, M.; Best, J.P.; Caruso, F. Coordination-Driven Multistep Assembly of Metal–Polyphenol Films and Capsules. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 1645–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Behboodi-Sadabad, F.; Zhang, H.; Trouillet, V.; Welle, A.; Plumeré, N.; Levkin, P.A. UV-Triggered Polymerization, Deposition, and Patterning of Plant Phenolic Compounds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1700127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, F.; Liu, X.; Chen, F.; Fu, Q. Mussel-Inspired Chemistry: A Promising Strategy for Natural Polysaccharides in Biomedical Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2021, 123, 101472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, C.; Zi, Y.; Wang, A.C.; Zou, H.; Dai, Y.; He, X.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.-C.; Feng, P.; Li, D.; et al. On the Electron-Transfer Mechanism in the Contact-Electrification Effect. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, S.; Wu, H.; Li, N.; Tan, X.; Deng, H.; Zhang, X.; Tang, J.; Li, Y. Triboelectric Mechanism of Oil-Solid Interface Adopted for Self-Powered Insulating Oil Condition Monitoring. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2207230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, C.; Liu, M.; Pschirer, N.G.; Baumgarten, M.; Müllen, K. Polyphenylene-Based Materials for Organic Photovoltaics. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6817–6855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gust, J.; Suwalski, J. Use of Mössbauer Spectroscopy to Study Reaction Products of Polyphenols and Iron Compounds. Corrosion 1994, 50, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meng, H.; Yu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Gai, Y.; Xue, J.; Bai, Y.; Qu, X.; Tan, P.; Luo, D.; Huang, W.; et al. Triboelectric Performances of Biodegradable Polymers. Matter 2023, 6, 4274–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bariya, M.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Javey, A. Wearable Sweat Sensors. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kwon, K.; Kim, J.U.; Deng, Y.; Krishnan, S.R.; Choi, J.; Jang, H.; Lee, K.; Su, C.-J.; Yoo, I.; Wu, Y.; et al. An On-Skin Platform for Wireless Monitoring of Flow Rate, Cumulative Loss and Temperature of Sweat in Real Time. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preparation and triboelectric properties of the TA−Fe3+-coated particle-deposited films. (a) A schematic diagram of the two-step preparation of TP triboelectric film. (b) The complex state of TA−Fe3+ under different pH conditions. (c) The XPS spectra of MTP, BTP, and TTP. (d) The transfer charge curves of three TPs contacting PA, TPU, Al, PET, Kapton, PDMS, and FEP. (e) The locational arrangement of three TPs in the triboelectric series. (f) The surface potential of three TPs measured by KPFM.
Figure 1. Preparation and triboelectric properties of the TA−Fe3+-coated particle-deposited films. (a) A schematic diagram of the two-step preparation of TP triboelectric film. (b) The complex state of TA−Fe3+ under different pH conditions. (c) The XPS spectra of MTP, BTP, and TTP. (d) The transfer charge curves of three TPs contacting PA, TPU, Al, PET, Kapton, PDMS, and FEP. (e) The locational arrangement of three TPs in the triboelectric series. (f) The surface potential of three TPs measured by KPFM.
Energies 18 02348 g001
Figure 2. Triboelectric properties and analysis of TA. (a) Electrostatic potential maps of TA molecule. (b) HOMO and LUMO energy levels and (c) energy gap diagram of TA, PTA, and TA−Fe3+. (d) Theoretical diagram of charge transfer process of TA and PTA/TA−Fe3+ before and after contact. EVAC, vacuum level of surface states. (e) Output charge density of PTA and TTP. (f) O 1s XPS spectra of TTP and deconvoluted spectra showing different oxygen species attached to Fe3+. (g) Structural stability measurements of MTP, BTP, and TTP.
Figure 2. Triboelectric properties and analysis of TA. (a) Electrostatic potential maps of TA molecule. (b) HOMO and LUMO energy levels and (c) energy gap diagram of TA, PTA, and TA−Fe3+. (d) Theoretical diagram of charge transfer process of TA and PTA/TA−Fe3+ before and after contact. EVAC, vacuum level of surface states. (e) Output charge density of PTA and TTP. (f) O 1s XPS spectra of TTP and deconvoluted spectra showing different oxygen species attached to Fe3+. (g) Structural stability measurements of MTP, BTP, and TTP.
Energies 18 02348 g002
Figure 3. Microstructure and electric performance of TTP. (a) SEM images of pristine PS particles and three TPs. Scale bar: 100 nm. (b) Thickness of TA−Fe3+ film on TTP was measured by high−resolution TEM. Black lines serve as reference marks for assessing film thickness. Scale bar: 10 nm. (c) Thickness of TA−Fe3+ film on surfaces of three TPs. (d) Influence of concentration of FeCl3·6H2O on film thickness. (e) Output performance of TTP with various PS particle sizes. (f) Output voltage of load, current density, and instantaneous peak power density of TTP−TENG under different loads at 1 Hz. (g) Charging voltage curves of TTP−TENG as function of equipped capacitance at 2 Hz. (h) Charge density and (i) maximum peak power of TENG constructed by TTP−gelatin, TTP−chitosan, and TTP−sodium alginate pairs. (j) Photograph of 120 LEDs lit in series by 5 × 5 cm2 TTP−chitosan bio−TENG.
Figure 3. Microstructure and electric performance of TTP. (a) SEM images of pristine PS particles and three TPs. Scale bar: 100 nm. (b) Thickness of TA−Fe3+ film on TTP was measured by high−resolution TEM. Black lines serve as reference marks for assessing film thickness. Scale bar: 10 nm. (c) Thickness of TA−Fe3+ film on surfaces of three TPs. (d) Influence of concentration of FeCl3·6H2O on film thickness. (e) Output performance of TTP with various PS particle sizes. (f) Output voltage of load, current density, and instantaneous peak power density of TTP−TENG under different loads at 1 Hz. (g) Charging voltage curves of TTP−TENG as function of equipped capacitance at 2 Hz. (h) Charge density and (i) maximum peak power of TENG constructed by TTP−gelatin, TTP−chitosan, and TTP−sodium alginate pairs. (j) Photograph of 120 LEDs lit in series by 5 × 5 cm2 TTP−chitosan bio−TENG.
Energies 18 02348 g003
Figure 4. Rapid and effective TP method compared with LbL method. (a) Schematic illustration of variation in surface morphology increased with cycles using LbL cyclic coating method. (b) SEM images of LbL films in eight and twelve coating cycles. (c) Thickness and (d) surface density of LbL films with various coating cycles. (e) Structural stability measurement of LbL films with various coating cycles. (f) Output performance comparison of ITO/PET, PS particles modified ITO/PET, as well as three types of complexations of LbL films and TP films. (g) Comparison of preparation time between TP method and LbL method.
Figure 4. Rapid and effective TP method compared with LbL method. (a) Schematic illustration of variation in surface morphology increased with cycles using LbL cyclic coating method. (b) SEM images of LbL films in eight and twelve coating cycles. (c) Thickness and (d) surface density of LbL films with various coating cycles. (e) Structural stability measurement of LbL films with various coating cycles. (f) Output performance comparison of ITO/PET, PS particles modified ITO/PET, as well as three types of complexations of LbL films and TP films. (g) Comparison of preparation time between TP method and LbL method.
Energies 18 02348 g004
Figure 5. Application of TTP triboelectric sensor in pH and ion detection. Charge curves of TTP sensor detecting different (a) pH values and (b) Na+ concentrations. Insets show charge ratios with fitting lines. (c) Response time of TTP sensor during contact and separation process. Charge ratios with fitting lines of Fe3+−loaded TTP sensor under diverse (d) Na+ concentrations and (e) pH values across varying Na+ concentrations. (f) Schematic diagram of TTP sensor detects pH and ion levels, serving as indicator for dehydration, electrolyte disparities, or metabolic syndrome.
Figure 5. Application of TTP triboelectric sensor in pH and ion detection. Charge curves of TTP sensor detecting different (a) pH values and (b) Na+ concentrations. Insets show charge ratios with fitting lines. (c) Response time of TTP sensor during contact and separation process. Charge ratios with fitting lines of Fe3+−loaded TTP sensor under diverse (d) Na+ concentrations and (e) pH values across varying Na+ concentrations. (f) Schematic diagram of TTP sensor detects pH and ion levels, serving as indicator for dehydration, electrolyte disparities, or metabolic syndrome.
Energies 18 02348 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, Z.; Guan, X.; He, J. Advancing Polyphenol-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators via pH-Modulated Rapid Synthesis of Tannic Acid–Metal Complexes. Energies 2025, 18, 2348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092348

AMA Style

Fang Z, Guan X, He J. Advancing Polyphenol-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators via pH-Modulated Rapid Synthesis of Tannic Acid–Metal Complexes. Energies. 2025; 18(9):2348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092348

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Zehao, Xuefei Guan, and Jingjing He. 2025. "Advancing Polyphenol-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators via pH-Modulated Rapid Synthesis of Tannic Acid–Metal Complexes" Energies 18, no. 9: 2348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092348

APA Style

Fang, Z., Guan, X., & He, J. (2025). Advancing Polyphenol-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerators via pH-Modulated Rapid Synthesis of Tannic Acid–Metal Complexes. Energies, 18(9), 2348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18092348

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop