This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion
by
Jannie Sønderkær Nielsen
Jannie Sønderkær Nielsen 1,*
,
Ryan Clarke
Ryan Clarke 2,
Joshua Paquette
Joshua Paquette 2,
Des Farren
Des Farren 3 and
Alex Byrne
Alex Byrne 4
1
Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark
2
SANDIA National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
3
ServusNet Informatics Ltd., T12 DVF8 Cork, Ireland
4
DNV Energy USA Inc., Olympia, WA 98501, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(21), 5784; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 13 October 2025
/
Revised: 29 October 2025
/
Accepted: 31 October 2025
/
Published: 2 November 2025
Abstract
IEA Wind Task 43 seeks to “unlock the full value of wind energy through digital transformation”. One mechanism to realize value is through enhanced data-driven decision-making and, while many areas in the wind sector can benefit from improved decision support, this case study focusses on a well-defined wind energy maintenance scenario involving blade inspection and repair. The solution concentrates on the specific damage category of blade leading edge erosion (LEE) and the optimum action to be taken for a given level of damage detected during periodic inspections. The key decision is whether to initiate repairs immediately or continue operating the turbine until the next inspection—and, if so, when that next inspection should take place. Even for such a specific damage type and decision option, the overall solution draws on multiple data types, ranging from damage classifications to cost drivers, and integrates a number of components including damage propagation, performance, and cost models. The core of the solution is a risk-based decision model using heuristic strategies, and Bayesian networks for optimized decision-making. This paper outlines the overall solution, expands on the data and modelling implementations, and discusses the results and conclusions arising from the investigation.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Nielsen, J.S.; Clarke, R.; Paquette, J.; Farren, D.; Byrne, A.
Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion. Energies 2025, 18, 5784.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784
AMA Style
Nielsen JS, Clarke R, Paquette J, Farren D, Byrne A.
Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion. Energies. 2025; 18(21):5784.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784
Chicago/Turabian Style
Nielsen, Jannie Sønderkær, Ryan Clarke, Joshua Paquette, Des Farren, and Alex Byrne.
2025. "Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion" Energies 18, no. 21: 5784.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784
APA Style
Nielsen, J. S., Clarke, R., Paquette, J., Farren, D., & Byrne, A.
(2025). Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion. Energies, 18(21), 5784.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.