Next Article in Journal
A Novel Hill Climb Search-Based Magnetization Control for Low Coercivity Electro-Permanent Magnet Systems
Previous Article in Journal
A New Design Strategy of Series of Tetrazole-Based High-Energy-Density Energy Storage Molecular Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion

1
Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark
2
SANDIA National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
3
ServusNet Informatics Ltd., T12 DVF8 Cork, Ireland
4
DNV Energy USA Inc., Olympia, WA 98501, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2025, 18(21), 5784; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 13 October 2025 / Revised: 29 October 2025 / Accepted: 31 October 2025 / Published: 2 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section A3: Wind, Wave and Tidal Energy)

Abstract

IEA Wind Task 43 seeks to “unlock the full value of wind energy through digital transformation”. One mechanism to realize value is through enhanced data-driven decision-making and, while many areas in the wind sector can benefit from improved decision support, this case study focusses on a well-defined wind energy maintenance scenario involving blade inspection and repair. The solution concentrates on the specific damage category of blade leading edge erosion (LEE) and the optimum action to be taken for a given level of damage detected during periodic inspections. The key decision is whether to initiate repairs immediately or continue operating the turbine until the next inspection—and, if so, when that next inspection should take place. Even for such a specific damage type and decision option, the overall solution draws on multiple data types, ranging from damage classifications to cost drivers, and integrates a number of components including damage propagation, performance, and cost models. The core of the solution is a risk-based decision model using heuristic strategies, and Bayesian networks for optimized decision-making. This paper outlines the overall solution, expands on the data and modelling implementations, and discusses the results and conclusions arising from the investigation.
Keywords: inspection and maintenance; decision support; Bayesian networks; risk; wind turbines; leading edge erosion; wind turbine blades; blade maintenance inspection and maintenance; decision support; Bayesian networks; risk; wind turbines; leading edge erosion; wind turbine blades; blade maintenance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nielsen, J.S.; Clarke, R.; Paquette, J.; Farren, D.; Byrne, A. Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion. Energies 2025, 18, 5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784

AMA Style

Nielsen JS, Clarke R, Paquette J, Farren D, Byrne A. Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion. Energies. 2025; 18(21):5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nielsen, Jannie Sønderkær, Ryan Clarke, Joshua Paquette, Des Farren, and Alex Byrne. 2025. "Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion" Energies 18, no. 21: 5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784

APA Style

Nielsen, J. S., Clarke, R., Paquette, J., Farren, D., & Byrne, A. (2025). Risk-Based Decision Modelling for Wind Turbine Leading Edge Erosion. Energies, 18(21), 5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18215784

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop