Applications of Hydrogenous Species for Initiation of Carbon Monoxide/Air Premixed Flame

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO) is classified as a simple fuel that contains one carbon and one oxygen atom. The oxidation of CO with an oxidizer is relatively unusual, with the oxidation of CO having a slow reaction time. The addition of a small amount of “hydrogenous” species, such as H₂, H₂O, and CH₄, will substantially increase the reaction time. This study numerically investigated and compared the effects of different hydrogenous species addition on the premixed CO/air flames, which act as the initiation of a CO/air flame, on the adiabatic flame temperature, laminar flame speed, and heat release rates at standard conditions (298 K and 1 atm pressure) using San Diego Mechanism. The results showed that the addition of critical hydrogenous species distinguished the difference between dry and wet CO/air oxidation, in which different hydrogenous species have an identical critical value. Adding different hydrogenous species and different addition ratios has an indistinguishable adiabatic flame temperature, while adding CH₄ has a higher laminar flame speed distribution compared with H₂ and H₂O addition, respectively. Furthermore, the laminar flame speed positively correlates with the net heat release rate, which adding CH₄ has a noticeable increase on the net heat release rate. Adding more hydrogenous species makes the reactant more reactive and moves the reaction zone upstream. Finally, the dominant reactions to the heat release rate are identical in different hydrogenous species addition, where R23: CO + O (+M) ⇌ CO₂ (+M) becomes the most contributed reaction.

1. Introduction

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, tasteless, and odorless gas classified as toxic due to its various health problems. When carbon monoxide enters the human lungs, it can cause reactions that dispossess oxygen from the human cells and diminish the oxygen storage in a muscle [1]. Once carbon monoxide is exposed to the air, the CO/air mixture becomes dangerous due to its wide flammability limit range (12.5–74%) [2], especially in a confined space. Carbon monoxide can be produced during the incomplete combustion of carbon fuels or appear naturally from forest fires and volcanic eruptions. Besides its harmful effects, carbon monoxide is also usually used in many industries, such as producing various chemicals, food processing, and agriculture. Also, carbon monoxide is one of the important species in hydrocarbon oxidation, which facilitates the production of CO₂ [3].

In the combustion fields, carbon monoxide is classified as a fuel and produces carbon dioxide when it reacts with the oxidizer. Two novel carbon monoxide oxidation mechanisms are classified as dry and wet carbon monoxide oxidation. In the dry carbon monoxide oxidation, CO is oxidized into CO₂ following the reaction steps of CO + O₂ → CO₂ + O and CO + O (+M) → CO₂ (+M). Due to the slow reaction time, these prolonged reactions cannot be readily attainable as a pure CO flame. Wet carbon monoxide oxidation can be achieved by adding a small number of impurities as a form of “hydrogenous” species, such as H₂, H₂O, or hydrocarbon. Introducing some hydrogenous species to the CO is oxidized will change its dominant reaction to CO + OH → CO₂ + H, which has a faster chemical reaction time [4].

Few literature studies concerning the fundamental studies and the practical applications focus on carbon monoxide combustion. There are considerable challenges to control and minimize the effect of hydrogen-containing species, such as water vapor in humid air, especially in the experimental study and industrial applications [5,6,7]. In the fundamental and numerical study, Rightley and Williams [8] examine the one-step rate expression, which can be used to find an analytical flame speed of CO/air oxidation with the hydrogen-containing species in the fuel between 1% and 10% in various temperature and pressure. The study found that one-step rate expression can accurately predict the flame speed of a CO/air flame in a wide range of conditions using minimum computational resources. In the same series of studies, Rightley and Williams [9] examine the critical hydrogen-containing species to discern the difference between dry and wet CO/air oxidation. They found that the critical hydrogen-containing species is in a factor of $1\times {10}^{-6}$, classified as dry CO oxidation via asymptotic and numerical simulation methods. Kim et al. [10] numerically examine the effect of water vapor addition on CO/O₂ flame using counterflow premixed flames configuration. Introducing the water vapor will substantially extend the flammability region of CO/O₂ flame. In the experimental study, Shen et al. [2] investigate the visual observation and overpressure characteristics of stoichiometric CO/air flame with and without CO₂ addition in a closed duct environment. Their study shows that the addition of CO₂ had a remarkable negative effect on flame, which reduced the flame propagation speed and pressure dynamics while increasing the flame instability. Besides the above fundamental studies, the CO-related study mainly blends the CO with H₂ to form a syngas (synthetic gas) [11,12,13] in various compositions, pressures, and temperatures. It was then found that hydrogen has a dominant effect on incrementing the laminar flame speed and adiabatic flame temperature, especially in the high hydrogen content.

Such worthy extensive studies have yielded the development of carbon monoxide flames using experimental and numerical methods that are reasonably predictive and comprehensive. On the other hand, most of the studies focus on blending carbon monoxide with hydrogen, which shows the dominance of hydrogen, even though it is a small portion of hydrogen blending. Furthermore, the study of wet CO oxidation with small hydrogenous species impurities (lower than 1%), such as H₂, H₂O, and CH₄, acting as the initiation of CO/air flames has not yet been explored. In the present study, the effects of small hydrogenous species addition as the initiation of the premixed CO/air flame is numerically studied in the one-dimensional freely propagating flame configuration. The critical amount of hydrogenous species addition to distinguish the dry and wet CO oxidation is first examined using laminar flame speed at a stoichiometric mixture. The laminar flame speed, adiabatic flame temperature, and heat release rate for different hydrogenous species additions are analyzed.

2. Methodology

This study used the FreeFlame model from the Cantera library, which uses steady, adiabatic, one-dimensional, unstrained, and freely propagating assumptions of laminar premixed flame. An equilibrate model from the Cantera library was used to calculate the equilibrium species and adiabatic flame temperature using constant enthalpy and pressure settings. Cantera is an open-source tool for solving various thermodynamic and combustion problems, compiling detailed chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes using the Python (3.10.16) and a MATLAB (R2024B) interface. The detailed mathematical expression of the Cantera library can be found in the Cantera page documentation [14]. A flame-fixed condition was used for the boundaries of the premixed flame to prevent the slope of species and temperature dependence and make the solution domain-independent. A grid distribution in a 0.08 m width with automatic refinement and a mixture-average transport model was applied with the maximum slope and curve of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively.

The mechanism validation was first conducted to ensure that the numerical settings and the used mechanism agreed well with the experimental data. Four different kinetic mechanisms, including the San Diego mechanism [15], GRI-Mech 3.0 mechanism [16], Kéromnès mechanism [12], and Zhang mechanism [13], were used to calculate the laminar flame speed of (CO/air) + H₂O. The calculated laminar flame speed was then compared with the results of Dong et al. [17], who experimented with the premixed CO/air flame at ambient conditions. It should be noted that, in the numerical simulation of CO/air flame, the solver can only solve the calculation when we treat it as wet carbon monoxide oxidation. Adding any hydrogenous species is necessary to initiate the solver to solve the numerical case of the CO/air flame. When burning carbon monoxide with air, the hydrogenous species may come from the presence of water vapor ($X_{H_{2}O}$) in the air to form a humid air. Nevertheless, in the study of Dong et al. [17], they did not specify the amount of $X_{H_{2}O}$, which can be estimated and validated using numerical simulation. The estimation of $X_{H_{2}O}$ in the air was firstly conducted by comparing the numerical simulation of stoichiometric (CO/air) + $X_{H_{2}O}$ flame with the available measured data by varying the $X_{H_{2}O}$ from $1\times {10}^{-10}$ to $1\times {10}^{-2}$. The measured laminar flame speed of CO/air first intersects with the calculated laminar flame speed at $X_{H_{2}O}$ = $1.2\times {10}^{-3}$. By these results, we extend the calculation of the laminar flame speed of CO/air flame with $X_{H_{2}O}$ = $1.2\times {10}^{-3}$ with different equivalence ratios, as shown in Figure 1. The San Diego mechanism result agrees well with the experiment compared to the other mechanisms. The calculated laminar flame speed agrees well with the equivalence ratio between 0.9 and 1.6; meanwhile, it is mostly overestimated in the equivalence ratio lower than 0.9 and higher than 1.6. The discrepancy mainly comes from the uncertainty of the measurement in the lean and rich (CO/air) flame, owing to the lower laminar flame speed of that region. This result indicates that (CO/air) + 1.2 $\times {10}^{-3}$ H₂O can represent the CO/air flame. Furthermore, the San Diego mechanism will be used for the following analysis.

The initiation of the premixed CO/air flame study was performed by adding three different hydrogenous species named methane (CH₄), hydrogen (H₂), and water vapor (H₂O). The parameters examined in this study were the species addition ratio ($R_i$) and mixture equivalence ratio ($\varphi$). The species addition ratio ($R_i$) represents the amount of hydrogenous species added to the CO/air mixture. The stoichiometric reaction for the CO/air flame with added species is as follows:

$$CO+0.5(O_2+3.76N_2)+R_i\left(i\right)\to C{O}_2+1.88N_2$$

(1)

where i represents the CH₄, H₂, and/or H₂O. The mixture equivalence ratio was defined as follows:

$$\varphi ={\displaystyle \frac{\left(X_{C{O}_{\left(g\right)}}/X_{O_{2\left(g\right)}}\right)}{{\left(X_{C{O}_{\left(g\right)}}/X_{O_{2\left(g\right)}}\right)}_{st}}}$$

(2)

where ${\left(X_{CO}/X_{O_2}\right)}_{st}$ represents the stoichiometric fuel to oxygen mole fraction of CO/air flame. The investigation involved a value of $R_i$ varied on $0.5\times {10}^{-3}$, $1.0\times {10}^{-3}$, and $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$, which is close to the CO/air flame ((CO/air) + 1.2 $\times {10}^{-3}$ H₂O). The value of $\varphi$ was varied from 0.5 to 4.0 to understand its effect on the wide range of equivalence ratios. It is worth mentioning that varying the $R_i$ from $0.5\times {10}^{-3}$ up to $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$ in the premixed CO/air flame will not significantly change mole fraction of the mixture. Also, the heat of combustion remains close to the CO/air flames (351 MJ/kmol) in different $R_i$, as illustrated in Figure 2a. Therefore, the definition of the equivalence ratio in Equation (2) remains the same with the CO/air flame when a small amount of hydrogenous species is introduced to the mixture. The upstream temperature and pressure were set to 300 K, and one atmospheric pressure and all reactants were in the gas phase.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2b shows the calculated laminar flame speed of the stoichiometric premixed CO/air flames for different hydrogenous species additions as a function of $R_i$ between $1\times {10}^{-10}$ and $1\times {10}^{-1}$. Adding different hydrogenous species to the CO/air flame has almost an similar laminar flame speed distribution for $R_i$ between $1\times {10}^{-10}$ and $1\times {10}^{-6}$. In the $R_i$ greater than $1\times {10}^{-6}$, the laminar flame speed of all different hydrogenous species starts to exponentially increase up to $R_i=1\times {10}^{-1}$. The exponential increase in laminar flame speed distinguished the difference between the dry and wet oxidation of the premixed CO/air flame [9]. The critical hydrogenous addition ratio ($R_{i,c}$) to shift the dry and the wet CO/air oxidation for different hydrogenous species is identical, owing to the promotion of H radicals from hydrogenous species decomposition [4]. The sensitivity analysis shows that the sensitivity coefficient of the top four essential elementary reactions starts to fluctuate when the $R_i\ge R_{i,c}$ (detailed analysis in Figure 3 below). Adding CH₄ to the premixed CO/air flame has a higher distribution of laminar flame speed compared with H₂ and H₂O addition, respectively. CH₄ will promote more OH radicals to react with CO to produce CO₂ compared with H₂ and H₂O (detailed analysis in Figure 4 below).

3.1. Effects of Different Hydrogenous Species Additions on the Adiabatic Flame Temperature and Laminar Flame Speed

Figure 5 shows the calculated adiabatic flame temperature ($T_{ad}$) and laminar flame speed ($S_L^o$) of CO/air for different $R_i$ as a function of equivalence ratios. The dashed lines represent the adiabatic flame temperature, while the solid line represents the laminar flame speed. By varying the hydrogenous species addition, the overall distribution of the adiabatic flame temperature of CO/air in the $R_i=0.5\times {10}^{-3}$ is almost identical by following a parabolic shape. The maximum adiabatic flame temperature is the same for different hydrogenous species additions, located on the equivalence ratio of 1.2 (2417 K), and lower for adiabatic flame temperature on ultra-lean ($\varphi =0.5$, 1765 K) and ultra-rich ($\varphi =4.0$, 1648 K) conditions. When the $R_i$ increased from $0.5\times {10}^{-3}$ to $1.0\times {10}^{-3}$, the adiabatic flame temperature distribution remains identical, owing to the identical value of the heat of combustion, where the heat of combustion remains close to the CO/air flame. Increasing the $R_i$ further to $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$ affected the adiabatic flame temperature of the CH₄ addition, which was slightly underestimated in the rich conditions ($\varphi >1.5$) compared with the H₂ and H₂O addition. Adding CH₄ to the rich CO/air combustion slightly reduced the heat of combustion, making the adiabatic flame temperature reduce, as shown in Figure 2a. The laminar flame speed distribution also follows the parabolic graph as adiabatic flame temperature distribution. In the case of $R_i=0.5\times {10}^{-3}$, the laminar flame speed for the CH₄ addition has a higher distribution compared with the H₂ and H₂O addition in different equivalence ratios. This indicates that adding CH₄ to the CO/air flame will produce a heat release rate more compared with H₂ and H₂O addition, leading to a higher laminar flame speed distribution (detailed analysis in Figure 6 below). In the case of H₂ and H₂O addition, the laminar flame speed is indistinguishable, showing a coinciding line. The natural characteristics of H₂ and H₂O are identical (two hydrogen atoms), which leads to the interchangeable laminar flame speed distribution. The difference effect of the H₂ and H₂O addition on the laminar flame speed becomes significant starting from $R_{H_2,H_{2}O}=1.0\times {10}^{-2}$, as shown in Figure 2b. For the $R_{H_2,H_{2}O}\ge 1.0\times {10}^{-2}$, H₂ has a considerable influence on the laminar flame speed compared to the H₂O addition due to its reactivity [18], which is beyond the scope of the current study. For instance, the maximum laminar flame speed appears at 12.75 cm/s (${\varphi }_{max}=1.8$) for the CH₄ addition and 8.92 cm/s (${\varphi }_{max}=1.7$) for the H₂ and H₂O addition into the CO/air flame, respectively. When the $R_i$ increases to $1.0\times {10}^{-3}$, the overall laminar flame speed has an identical shape with a higher distribution than $R_i=0.5\times {10}^{-3}$. The maximum laminar flame speed of the CH₄ addition increases to 17.38 cm/s ($\varphi =2.0$), while for the H₂ and H₂O addition, it increases to 12.30 cm/s (${\varphi }_{max}=1.8$). In $R_i=3.0\times {10}^{-3}$, the overall laminar flame speed increases more than twice compared with $R_i=0.5\times {10}^{-3}$, where the maximum laminar flame speed of the CH₄, H₂, and H₂O addition is 28.60 cm/s (${\varphi }_{max}=2.2$), 20.29 cm/s (${\varphi }_{max}=2.05$), and 19.57 cm/s (${\varphi }_{max}=2.05$), respectively. The laminar flame speed distribution of the H₂ addition starts to be slightly higher than the H₂O addition due to its reactivity, especially in the rich mixture. Increasing the $R_i$ has the quasi-linear relation with increasing the maximum laminar flame speed of the CO/air flames.

The effect of hydrogenous species addition to the laminar flame speed of the CO/air flame can be described as the increment of adiabatic flame temperature (thermal effect), the reduction in activation energy, the increase in active radicals (chemical effect), and the high mobility of hydrogen (transport effect) [19,20,21]. Tang et al. [19] found that the thermal and chemical effects are dominant compared with the transport effect. Nevertheless, adding a small amount of hydrogenous species to the CO/air produces an identical heat of combustion and adiabatic flame temperature, minimizing the thermal effect on the laminar flame speed. Therefore, the change in laminar flame speed mainly comes from the chemical effect.

Sensitivity analysis was performed to understand the major reactions that contributed to the change of the laminar flame speed when CH₄, H₂, and H₂O were added with different additions. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the sensitivity analysis results of the CO/air flame with different hydrogenous species additions near the $R_{i,c}$ and various equivalence ratios, respectively. In Figure 3, the different colors and symbols represent the different reaction numbers. In Figure 4, the no hatch, forward slash (//), and backward slash ($\setminus \setminus$) pattern represent $R_i=0.5\times {10}^{-3},1.0\times {10}^{-3}$, and $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$, respectively. The top four essential elementary reactions with their reaction numbers and important properties are shown in

Table 1. Reaction number and reaction equations.

Reaction Number	Reaction Equation	A (m3·kmol−3·s−1)	E (J·kmol−1)
R0	H + O2 ⇌ O + OH	$3.52\times {10}^{16}$	$1.71\times {10}^4$
R8	H + O2 (+M) ⇌ HO2 (+M)	$4.65\times {10}^{12}$	0
	M = H2O, C2H6, He, CO, CO2, Ar, H2
R23	CO + O (+M) ⇌ CO2 (+M)	$1.8\times {10}^{11}$	$2384.08$
	M = H2O, He, CO, CO2, Ar, H2
R24	CO + OH ⇌ CO2 + H	$4.4\times {10}^6$	$-740.92$

.

In Figure 3, the sensitivity coefficient of the top four essential elementary reactions is mostly near zero when $R_i=1.0\times {10}^{-7}$ in different hydrogenous species. When $R_i$ increases to $1.0\times {10}^{-6}$ ($R_{i,c}$), the sensitivity coefficient of four reactions becomes fluctuating, indicating the change of the chemical scheme of CO oxidation. R0 becomes the most fluctuated reaction as the hydrogenous species starts to contribute to the production of H radicals from its decomposition, which later reacts with O₂ from the air to produce OH radicals (R0). The produced OH radicals then reacted with CO (R24) as the significant reaction contributing to the production of CO₂ [4,22]. R24 also starts to have a positive (promotion) sensitivity coefficient as the production mechanism for CO₂ is shifted from dry CO oxidation (R23) to wet CO oxidation (R24). It is evidence that R23 stays near zero sensitivity coefficient on $R_{i,c}$ as R23 contributed less to the laminar flame speed. Increasing $R_i$ further, the sensitivity coefficients of R0 and R24 become more positive, while R23 is nearly unchanged.

In Figure 4, the dominant reaction contribution in the sensitivity analysis of the laminar flame speed is similar for different $R_i$ in different equivalence ratios. R0 and R24 have a positive sensitivity coefficient, while R8 and R23 have a negative (inhibiting) sensitivity coefficient. In $\varphi =0.6$, R24 turns into the most contributed reaction, owing to the presence of O₂ becoming less in the lean mixture. Thus, the contribution from the reaction related to the consumption of O₂ (R0) becomes inferior. The hydrogenous species produces H radicals, reducing the sensitivity coefficient of R0 slightly (up to ∼6%). In comparison, the sensitivity coefficient of R24 remains the same when $R_i$ increases from $0.5\times {10}^{-3}$ to $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$.

In the stoichiometric condition, the sensitivity coefficient of R0 increases, while the sensitivity coefficient of R24 reduces. Increasing the equivalence ratio will generally increase the hydrogenous species and reduce the O₂ in the mixture, intensifying the production of OH (R0). It should be noted that the increment of produced OH radicals is not sufficient to react with CO as the amount of hydrogenous species is much less compared with the amount of CO in the premixtures. Consequently, the sensitivity coefficient of R24 reduces in the stoichiometric condition. This implies that the contribution of R0 and R24 is mainly controlled by adding hydrogenous species and primary fuel (CO) species, respectively. When $R_i$ increases from $0.5\times {10}^{-3}$ to $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$, the difference of R0 and R24 becomes more distinguishable, with the contribution of R0 becoming weaker, while R24 becomes stronger. The sensitivity coefficient of the third-body reaction (R8 and R23) was also reduced, weakening its inhibiting effect and increasing its laminar flame speed. When $\varphi$ increases further to 2.0 and 3.0, the sensitivity coefficients of R0 and R24 repeatedly increase and decrease, respectively. Furthermore, the third body reaction R23 has the minimum inhibiting effects in the $\varphi$ = 2.0, which aligns with the pattern illustrated in Figure 5, where the maximum laminar flame speed appears near the $\varphi$ = 2.0.

3.2. Effects of Different Hydrogenous Species Additions on Heat Release Rate

The effects of different hydrogenous species additions on the net heat release rate (HRR) were investigated. Since the effect of the H₂ and H₂O addition are identical, the results will focus on the comparison between the addition of CH₄ and H₂ in different $R_{C{H}_4,H_2}$ and $\varphi$. Figure 6 shows the net heat release rate of the CH₄ and H₂ addition with respect to non-dimensional axial distance ($x/L$) ranging from 0 to 1. Four different equivalence ratios were chosen in order to observe different conditions, including lean ($\varphi =0.6$), stoichiometric ($\varphi =1.0$), maximum laminar flame speed ($\varphi =2.0$), and rich $(\varphi =2.0$) conditions.

Increasing $R_{C{H}_4,H_2}$ from from $0.5\times {10}^{-3}$ to $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$ linearly increases the net heat release rate for both the CH₄ and H₂ addition in different equivalence ratios. The maximum net heat release rate ($HR{R}_{max}$) occurred in the $\varphi =2.0$, close to the maximum laminar flame speed for CH₄ and H₂ additions. These findings have linear results presented by Chen et al. [23], in which the laminar flame speed positively correlates with the net heat release rate. Adding CH₄ results in a noticeable increase in the net heat release rate, with $HR{R}_{max}$ increasing more than 300% when $R_{C{H}_4}$ increases to $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$.

The increment of $R_{C{H}_4,H_2}$ also affected the location of $HR{R}_{max}$, which moves upstream in every equivalence ratio. These results are also confirmed with the identical distribution and location of the maximum temperature gradient ${(dT/dx)}_{max}$, presented in Figure 7. ${(dT/dx)}_{max}$ usually defines the location of the flame front, representing the fast reaction zones [24]. Also, ${(dT/dx)}_{max}$ has a relation with the flame thickness (${\delta }_L^o$) [25] through the following equation:

$${\delta }_L^o={\displaystyle \frac{T_b-T_u}{{(dT/dx)}_{max}}}$$

(3)

where $T_u$ is the unburned mixture temperature, and $T_b$ is the burned combustion product temperature. Since $T_u$ and $T_b$ are identical for different i and $R_i$ (see the distribution of $T_{ad}$ in Figure 5), ${(dT/dx)}_{max}$ is a significant factor to affect the ${\delta }_L^o$. Based on the above equation, the increase in ${(dT/dx)}_{max}$ will reduce ${\delta }_L^o$, indicating the stronger reaction rate in the reaction zone. Smaller ${\delta }_L^o$ would be more prone to having a higher heat release rate. This may infer that the increment and upstream shift of $HR{R}_{max}$ and ${(dT/dx)}_{max}$ indicate that increasing $R_i$ on the CO/air flame enhances the production of OH radicals through R0 and makes the reactant more reactive [20].

The heat production rate was analyzed to understand the reaction that contributed to the heat release rate. Figure 8 shows that the major reaction contributed to the heat production rate of the CH₄ addition on the CO/air flame as a function of non-dimensional axial distance ($x/L$) in different equivalence ratios. $R_{C{H}_4,H_2}=1.0\times {10}^{-3}$ was chosen as this addition ratio is close to the CO/air flame case. As we observed previously, adding CH₄ to the CO/air flame will increase both the laminar flame speed and net heat release rate compared to H₂ and H₂O in different $R_i$ and $\varphi$. Thus, the heat production rate analysis will be performed on CH₄ in addition to the CO/air flame in various $\varphi$. R23 becomes the major contributing reaction to the heat production rate, followed by R24 and R8. R0 has a negative distribution, meaning that R0 has a heat-absorbing effect on the net heat release rate.

The third-body reaction R23 becomes the most contributed reaction with more than 60% contribution to the net heat release rate. The oxidation of the fuel (CO) to become CO₂ is an essential reaction contributing to the net heat release rate through R23 and R24. The heat production from R24 has an almost proportional heat absorption of R0, making the net contribution to the total heat release of these two reactions limited. The third-body reaction R8 appears first compared to another reaction in every equivalence ratio, meaning that the heat produced from R8 initiates total heat release. Although the contribution from R8 is relatively small, it is essential to initiate the reaction. Figure 9 shows the major reaction contributed to the heat production rate of the CH₄ addition as a function of temperature in different equivalence ratios. R8 has a peak in a relatively low temperature (<1000 K), while R0, R23, and R24 have a peak in a relatively higher temperature (between 1300 K and 1500 K).

4. Conclusions

In this study, the effects of small hydrogenous species (CH₄, H₂, and H₂O) additions as the initiation of the premixed CO/air flame were numerically investigated using a one-dimensional freely propagating flame configuration. The addition ratios of various hydrogenous species ranging from $0.5\times {10}^{-3}$ up to $3.0\times {10}^{-3}$ vary with a wide range of equivalence ratios in STP conditions. The combustion characteristics such as adiabatic flame temperature, laminar flame speed, and heat release rate were studied. The major conclusions of this study are as follows:

Adding different hydrogenous species to the premixed CO/air flame has an identical critical value, distinguishing the difference between dry and wet CO/air oxidation, which is $R_{i,c}=1\times {10}^{-6}$. In the $R_i$ greater than $1\times {10}^{-6}$, the laminar flame speed of all different hydrogenous species starts to exponentially increase up to $R_i=1\times {10}^{-1}$.

Adding different hydrogenous species and different addition ratios has an identical adiabatic flame temperature, while adding CH₄ has a higher laminar flame speed distribution compared with H₂ and H₂O addition, respectively. The chemical effects have a noticeable contribution to the laminar flame speed, where R0: H +O₂ ⇌ O + OH and R24: CO + OH ⇌ CO₂ + H become the most contributed reactions to the flame speed.

The laminar flame speed positively correlates with the net heat release rate, where adding CH₄ results in a noticeable increase in the net heat release rate. The hydrogenous species makes the reactant more reactive, and the reaction zone moves upstream. The dominant reactions to the heat release rate are identical in different hydrogenous species additions, where R23: CO + O (+M) ⇌ CO₂ (+M) becomes the most contributed reaction.