3.1. The Analysis of the CHD Event in 2022 in China
To assess the meteorological drought, the daily maximum temperature (T
max) and Meteorological-Drought Composite Index (MCI) were employed. The MCI takes into account the comprehensive effects of rainfall and evaporation at different timescales, which performs better in terms of temporal–spatial continuity and accounts for more realistic durations than other drought indices [
15].
Figure 2 illustrates the evolution of valley-averaged daily maximum temperature (T
max) and MCI during the boreal summer of 2022. It is clear that the Yangtze River valley experienced a hot summer, with T
max above its climatology from June to August. Particularly, the valley-averaged T
max exceeded the threshold of 35 °C for 14 consecutive days from August 7th to 23rd (
Figure 2a).
Figure 2b demonstrates the evolution of MCI during the summer, which reflects the cumulative effect of rainfall and evaporation. As a result, the hydropower generation in the upper reaches were severely affected. Another notable feature is that this heatwave affected the entire Yangtze River valley. As shown in
Figure 2c, T
max is 4 °C higher than normal over the upper, middle, and lower reaches. This continuous heatwave, along with the reduced rainfall, led to the development of drought over the Yangtze River valley. This kind of valley-scale compound heatwave and drought (CHD) is very rare for the wet season of the Yangtze River valley.
Climate change exacerbates drought risk in the southwest of China. According to a study on the annual average frequency and duration of energy droughts of hydropower in the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) where most of the hydropower plants are located in Sichuan and Chongqing, the energy drought occurs on average 10 times per year, with a duration of 54 days/year, and more energy droughts are observed during the summer (June to August) than during the winter (December to February). In comparison, the drought event in Summer 2022 was about a 1-in-52-year event over the 2007–2021 climate period, and was seven times the average severity than in the summers of 2007–2021 [
16]. The global and regional climate drivers such as the El Niño (La Niña) and the Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean summer monsoons, together with the global warming that increases evaporation, influence droughts and flooding in the southwest of China. It is projected that the risk of energy drought of hydropower in the southwest of China will keep increasing. Under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) SSP2-45 and SSP5-85 scenarios, which represent business-as-usual and high emission scenarios, the return periods of an extreme drought event like that in 2022 are 10 and 6 years, and the future drought risks will increase by 80% and 88% in the Yangtze River basin, respectively [
16].
3.2. Impacts of the CHD Event on the Power Load
Based on the provincial daily maximum load data of the two southwest provinces, Sichuan and Chongqing, the cooling load could be calculated by deducting the actual load data with the spring/autumn average base load [
17]. The underlying rationale assumes that the cooling load is neglectable during spring and autumn, and the primary cause of the discrepancy between summer and spring/autumn averages is attributed to cooling demand. Consequently, by employing the actual daily load during summer and subtracting the corresponding spring/autumn average base load—defined as the mean daily load prevalent in spring and autumn—we can effectively estimate the cooling load. The specific steps are as follows: Initially, the typical daily load in autumn is determined by averaging the data collected between September 10 and October 15, while the typical daily load in spring is obtained by averaging the data gathered from April 15 to May 15. Subsequently, the base load calculation differentiates between working days and weekend days, taking into account the distinct patterns of energy consumption associated with each type of day. By assuming a linear growth pattern, the base load increases consistently between spring and autumn. The cooling loads are all set to be positive in this study. In instances where the actual load value on a specific day falls below the corresponding base load value, the cooling load is assigned a value of zero, as suggested by Liu et al. [
17].
Figure 3 illustrates the relationship between the computed cooling power load and the daily maximum temperature.
Table 1 displays the spline function parameter estimation results for the nonlinear response of summer cooling load to extreme high temperatures in Sichuan Province and Chongqing. In Sichuan, the extreme high temperature percentiles P25, P50, P75, and P95 correspond to node values of 28.39 °C, 31.69 °C, 35.23 °C, and 36.90 °C, respectively. Similarly, in Chongqing, the extreme high temperature percentiles P25, P50, P75, and P95 exhibit node values of 31.13 °C, 35.92 °C, 38.53 °C, and 41.27 °C, respectively. Overall, the influence of extreme high temperatures on cooling load exhibits a significant nonlinear relationship [
6]. Elevated temperatures within the RCS2 interval result in a significant increase in cooling load, with the magnitude of this increase surpassing the parameter estimation outcomes in the RCS1 interval. However, extreme high temperatures within the RCS3 interval lead to a substantial reduction in cooling load. This phenomenon can be attributed to the compound effects of CHD on both the consumption and supply sides: the impact of extreme high temperatures leading to an increased cooling load (consumption effect) is countered by the negative influence of drought on hydropower generation (supply effect). The CHD event severely affected power supply capacity, particularly in the hydropower sector, making it challenging to meet power demands. Provincial grids, such as those in Sichuan and Chongqing, implemented “power rationing” measures to ensure residents’ basic power needs were met, ultimately resulting in a decrease in cooling load.
Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between the fitted values of cooling load and extreme high temperatures, demonstrating the nonlinear response of the cooling load to extreme high temperatures and highlighting the significant heterogeneity across different provinces. In the RCS1 and RCS2 intervals, the cooling load curves for Sichuan and Chongqing both rise in response to increasing temperatures, with steeper slopes in the RCS2 interval compared to RCS1. This suggests that the cooling load increases at a higher rate than the temperature, resulting in a U-shaped or convex curve. In the RCS3 interval, the compound impacts of CHD led to a considerable loss of power supply in Sichuan, causing a significant decrease in cooling load when temperatures exceeded 35.23 °C (
Figure 4a). Meanwhile, in Chongqing, CHD resulted in stagnation and a slight decline in cooling load when temperatures surpassed 38.53 °C (
Figure 4b).
To estimate the cooling demand in the intervals above 35.23 °C in Sichuan and above 38.53 °C in Chongqing, the average values of the parameter estimates for RCS1 and RCS2 were utilized to replace the parameter estimates for RCS3 (
Figure 4). Subsequently, the difference between the predicted and actual values was calculated to determine the cooling load gap attributable to the combined effect of high temperature and drought. In Sichuan, the average cooling load gap amounted to 23.20 GW, equivalent to 63.6% of the spring–autumn average load. The maximum cooling load gap reached 41.98 GW, equivalent to 71% of the annual peak load. In Chongqing, the average cooling load gap was 6.55 GW, representing 45.8% of the spring–autumn average load, while the maximum cooling load gap was 10.62 GW, equivalent to 41.4% of the annual peak load.
According to statistics from the power industry, both Sichuan and Chongqing experienced record-breaking maximum loads during the summer of 2022. In Sichuan, even after the implementation of power rationing measures, the peak load still jumped to 65 GW in August due to the continuous heatwave, an increase of 25% compared to the previous year. The daily residential electricity consumption in Sichuan reached up to 473 million kWh, an increase of 263.8% when compared with annually averaged daily residential electricity consumption. The industrial and commercial daily electricity consumption increased by 50%, of which the cooling load accounted for more than 60% [
2]. It is estimated that the largest power gaps in Sichuan and Chongqing reached 17 GW and 4.5 GW, respectively. During peak load periods, which coincided with the highest temperature intervals, the power gaps in Sichuan and Chongqing were approximately one-half and one-third of the annual average power load, respectively. To address this issue, large-scale controlled power consumption measures were implemented in both provinces, particularly targeting industrial power loads, as opposed to cooling loads, which primarily stem from residential and service sectors. The study results predict a theoretical cooling load based on daily maximum temperatures which is higher than real-world data. This discrepancy between predicted results and actual data can be attributed to the limitations of the industrial power load, rather than a decrease in cooling load. Consequently, it is important to note that the nonlinear relationship between cooling load and temperature found in this study may be influenced by the reduction of peak loads during extreme high temperatures (RCS3 interval), likely due to the curtailment of industrial power loads rather than a decrease in cooling load.
As a result of the CHD event, Sichuan Province had to suspend the production of industrial enterprises to guarantee the residential electricity consumption and safeguard people’s livelihood, as the drought and high temperature limited the hydropower generation capacity and the power grid transmission capacity [
18]. Due to the statistics from the power sector in Sichuan Province, in the summer of 2022, Sichuan’s electricity demand surged and set a new monthly electricity sales record. In July 2022, the electricity sales were 29.1 billion kWh, a year-on-year increase of 19.8%. Among them, Sichuan’s large industrial daily electricity consumption reached 431 million kWh, a year-on-year increase of 13.1%; the average daily electricity consumption of residents was 344 million kWh, a year-on-year increase of 93.3%.
3.3. Impacts of the CHD Event on the Renewable Power Sources
In 2022, the installed capacities for hydropower, wind power, and photovoltaic (PV) power generation in Southwest China (including Sichuan Province and Chongqing Municipality) reached 110 GW, 8 GW, and 5 GW, respectively. In terms of annual electricity generation, hydropower produced 409.9 TWh, wind power generated 15.9 TWh, and PV power contributed 5.3 TWh. The installed capacities of hydropower, wind power, and PV power generation in Southwest China collectively constituted 78% of the total installed capacity in the region, with hydropower alone accounting for 70%.
3.3.1. Hydropower
From a river valley development perspective, the hydropower basins in Sichuan and Chongqing are primarily developed along the Dadu River, Yalong River, Jinsha River, Minjiang River, Jialing River, and other river valleys. As a major power transmission province, Sichuan’s annual electricity output can reach one-third of hydropower generation. While some rivers, such as the Liuchuan River, primarily rely on run-of-river hydropower stations on the tributaries of the Yangtze River, they lack water storage capacity and have very limited regulation ability. As a result, their power generation is highly dependent on natural water inflows and is easily affected by high temperatures and drought conditions. In total, the installed capacity of reservoir power stations with seasonal and annual adjustment capabilities in Sichuan only accounted for 36% of the total installed capacity of hydropower [
2]. Thus, extreme heat and drought climate events could have substantial impact on hydropower, which in turn affects the overall power output in Southwest China.
During the period of July 1 to August 14, rainfall in the Yangtze River valley was recorded at 137.6 mm, representing a 46.2% decrease compared to the same period in the previous year (256.0 mm). This marked the lowest level in the same period of history since 1961, with the second lowest being 160.4 mm in 1972 (
Figure 5a). The average number of rainy days in the valley was only 12.9 days, which is 7.1 days fewer than the average for the same period in normal years (20.0 days), making it the lowest in recorded history. Rainfall levels in most areas of the valley were more than 20% lower than those of the same period in previous years, with the central area of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River valley experiencing a 50% to 80% reduction.
Starting from mid-July, the daily power generation of hydropower began to gradually decline, in line with the decrease in incoming water. In July 2022, the per unit (PU) value of hydropower daily power generation reached approximately 0.95 (PU is calculated by dividing the daily power generation by the maximum daily power generation throughout the year). By the beginning of August, the PU value of daily power generation dropped to 0.9, and by around August 25, the daily power generation reached its lowest value of 0.7. According to the China Electricity Council (CEC), hydropower production in Sichuan decreased by half during the summer of 2022 compared to the previous year.
If we calculate the abnormal cumulative precipitation from June 1st, we can find that the cumulative precipitation began decreasing on June 25th, and the cumulative precipitation was approximately 190 mm until the end of August. As a comparison, the per unit (PU) of the hydropower generation continued to increase from 0.74 from June, reaching its peak on July 11th, and then gradually decreased during the period between July 11st and August 10th, then sharply decreased from August 10th to its lowest level of 0.71 on August 25th. From
Figure 5a, we can conclude that there was significant divergence, or a negative relationship, from June to July 11th between the hydropower generation and the cumulative precipitation trend, but the relationship turns to a positive one thereafter. To account for this phenomenon, we can conclude that there is a delay between the hydropower generation management and the precipitation index. There are time lags between the prediction of climate results, delivery to the water resource management, and then the hydropower generation plan. Therefore, it is critical to develop climate predictions and climate services for the power industry.
3.3.2. Wind Power
In terms of wind power, the relationship between wind speed and wind power output was quantitatively assessed (
Figure 5b). In July and August, wind speeds in the southwest region slowed down, decreasing from 2.0 m/s in mid-July to 1.7 m/s in early August. Given that wind power output is proportional to the third power of wind speed, wind power generation in Southwest China also experienced a significant decline during this period. The per unit value of daily wind power generation dropped from 0.9 in mid-July to around 0.2–0.3 in early to mid-August.
The long-term climate warming, compounded by short-term, high-pressure stagnant weather, has led to a decrease in wind power generation. On a climate time scale, the reduced pressure difference between regions due to climate warming has resulted in a long-term decline in average wind speed. On a weather time scale, high-pressure weather systems have caused stagnant weather, further reducing short-term wind speeds. In July, the average wind power generation in China (excluding South China) was approximately 50 GW, representing only 20% of the installed capacity and exacerbating power balance tensions.
3.3.3. Solar Power
In terms of photovoltaics, a quantitative evaluation was conducted on the relationship between sunshine hours and solar power generation (
Figure 5c). In mid-July, sunshine duration dropped from a maximum of 12 h at the beginning of the month to a minimum of just 1 h. Since the beginning of August, sunshine duration increased, reaching about 10 h in mid-August, and then began to decrease again towards the end of August. Fluctuations in solar power generation followed a pattern similar to that of sunshine hours. The daily photovoltaic power generation was only 0.4 in mid-July and increased to 0.8 in mid-August.
Extreme high temperatures have resulted in a decrease, rather than an increase, in photovoltaic (PV) output, thereby reducing solar power generation. Long-term climate change has contributed to a reduction in direct radiation and sunshine hours. Additionally, extreme high temperatures can diminish the output power of PV modules and even cause damage to components, impacting the overall performance of PV power generation. For instance, in 2022, the installed PV capacity in Sichuan increased by 5% compared to the same period in 2021; however, PV power generation in July experienced a year-on-year decrease of 6%.
3.3.4. Complementarity of the Hydro–Wind–PV Power
Based on the per unit (PU) value of hydro, wind, and PV power (in
Figure 5d), we can observe that there is complementarity between hydro, PV, and wind power output [
19]. For instance, hydropower was decreasing while wind and PV power were increasing during the period spanning July 11th–25th. Additionally, there is complementarity between wind and PV, where wind is low while PV is high during the period spanning July 1st–10th and in August. It should be noted that the installed capacities of wind and PV are still relatively small compared to hydropower in the southwest, but they are growing rapidly and can play a much more significant complementary role in the future.
It is estimated that the installed capacities of hydro, wind, and PV power in Sichuan province will increase from 80.2 GW, 4.5 GW, and 3 GW in 2020 to 132 GW, 30 GW, and 30 GW in 2050, and the installed capacities of hydro, wind, and PV power in Chongqing will increase from 7.8 GW, 0.8 GW, and 0.7 GW in 2020 to 10.2 GW, 9.5 GW, and 7.5 GW in 2050 [
20]. Wind and PV capacities will increase by 7.4 and 10.2 times in Sichuan and Chongqing over the next three decades, while hydropower will only double.
In terms of energy balance, PV and wind power are negatively correlated. On days when PV output is larger, wind power output is smaller. PV and wind power form a more complementary relationship. As wind power and PV installations expand in the future, PV and wind power can help alleviate the electricity shortages caused by hydropower deficits. Therefore, the configuration of the installed hydro–wind–PV combination can be further developed to better stabilize total output fluctuations in future power supply.