Next Article in Journal
Renewable Energy Potential Estimation Using Climatic-Weather-Forecasting Machine Learning Algorithms
Previous Article in Journal
A Fully Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Approach for Multi-Fracture Propagation Simulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advancements in Offshore Vertical Axis Wind Turbines

Department of Environmental Design, Faculty for the Built Environment, University of Malta, 2080 Msida, Malta
Energies 2023, 16(4), 1602; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041602
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 30 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 5 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section A3: Wind, Wave and Tidal Energy)
In the past few years, the journal Energies received various original research manuscripts on offshore vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs). These articles highlight the heightened interest (see also Hand and Cashman [1]) in expanding the penetration of VAWTs beyond the small to medium-scale units found, for instance, in the built environment. This editorial aims to highlight various articles received by Energies that may be relevant to floating offshore VAWTs. The general landscape of the state-of-the-art progress in this area is also provided, but this article is not meant to be a literature review. This editorial is also intended to entice the growth of this field of wind energy science.
In a recent review, Arredondo-Galeana and Brennan [2] highlight major advantages of floating offshore VAWTs that contribute towards improved stability due to their generally low center of gravity (CoG), as well as the lower over-turning moment (OTM). This corroborates with other literature, such as that by Borg et al. [3] and Borg and Collu [4]. The severity of generator or gearbox failures is also reduced due to easier accessibility, while wind-farm power density is improved given the possibility to reduce turbine spacings as opposed to the HAWT alternative. Other risks predominant in HAWTs, such as yawing system failures, are eliminated in the case of VAWTs. On the other hand, it is well known that the power coefficient of VAWTs can be in the order of 20% less than HAWTs, a fact that has led to HAWTs leading the way in both industry and research. Nevertheless, this ball-park figure refers to the ideal condition when the HAWT rotor is perpendicular to the wind direction. In practice, floating offshore turbines can exhibit 6-degrees of freedom (DOF) motions due to the wave motion that can degrade performance substantially unless extensive control engineering is implemented. Figure 1 (source: Arredondo-Galeana and Brennan [2]) shows that current VAWT offshore design initiatives have mostly focused on buoyancy and ballast foundation types, highlighting the lack of penetration of other technologies at the pilot scale level.
Senga et al. [5] showed, using a lifting line numerical solution, that a tilted VAWT provides an improved wake recovery effect compared to an upright VAWT, thus allowing to improve further the power density of a wind farm. VAWTs tend to employ simpler airfoil profiles than HAWTs, but the flow unsteadiness in the floating case highlights the need for improved airfoil data. Models that require airfoil data as an input, such as lifting line and double multiple streamtube models, remain reliant on accurate data, which can also model correctly dynamic stall conditions (see, for example, Dyachuk and Goude [6]). The use of tailor-made airfoils for floating applications have also started to emerge, as in the study by Pan et al. [7]. Unsteady effects and structural dynamics have been studied by Ishie et al. [8]. These lead to structural fatigue damage exacerbated by the dynamic conditions in the floating case. Such fatigue effects have been reported in a case study for onshore VAWTs. Borg and Collu [9] also provide a frequency domain analysis of the loads experienced by floating VAWTs. The authors report a noticeable increase in aerodynamic loads which directly impact the fatigue of mooring lines and other VAWT components. Similarly, Liu et al. [10] emphasise the importance of aerodynamic loads on the structural strength of floating VAWTs. It remains clear that further insight into floating offshore VAWT fatigue phenomena is needed.
The complex 6-DOF motions for floating offshore VAWTs, combined with the varying azimuthal loads experienced during blade rotation, resulted in an overall degradation of the aerodynamic performance of the turbine. However, appropriate control can be adopted to mitigate these effects. For instance, Li et al. [11] showed that speed control could be used based on efficiency and load considerations to match the rotational speed with wind speed. Furthermore, past articles in Energies have shown how Circulation Control (CC) using active jets can provide lift augmentation and load control (Shires and Kourkoulis [12]). Such technologies have already been extensively researched in HAWTs but can be transferred to VAWTs if further research is conducted.
Authors such as Buranarote et al. [13] have created 2D wake models that can provide quick insight into rotor-to-rotor interactions. More elaborate 3D CFD approaches, such as that by Brownstein et al. [14], have been used to show the enhanced performance of both the downstream and upstream turbines. In addition, the authors show, using a surrogate model, that turbine spacings can be optimised based on the resulting wake dynamics. Another study by Furukawa et al. [15] proposes a model for quantifying the interacting torques as a result of the VAWT rotor phase synchronisation. More advanced studies on floating VAWT wake interactions, taking into account pitching motions, can be found in Kuang et al. [16]. The authors again highlight the positive effects on wake recovery due to these pitching motions. These studies underpin the fundamental need to study VAWTs at the wind farm scale, which would help further support the research drive towards floating offshore VAWT wind farms.
The review by Arredondo-Galeana and Brennan [2] highlights various possibilities for increasing the technology readiness level of future offshore VAWTs. These include: (i) a better understanding of the rotor aerodynamics as a result of 6-DOF motions, (ii) improvement of mechanical design to mitigate cyclic loading, and (iii) control using techniques, such as morphing blades.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hand, B.; Cashman, A. A review on the historical development of the lift-type vertical axis wind turbine: From onshore to offshore floating application. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2020, 38, 100646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arredondo-Galeana, A.; Brennan, F. Floating offshore vertical axis wind turbines: Opportunities, challenges and way forward. Energies 2021, 14, 8000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Borg, M.; Shires, A.; Collu, M. Offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. part I: Aerodynamics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 1214–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Borg, M.; Collu, M. A comparison between the dynamics of horizontal and vertical axis offshore floating wind turbines. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2015, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Senga, H.; Umemoto, H.; Akimoto, H. Verification of tilt effect on the performance and wake of a vertical axis wind turbine by lifting line theory simulation. Energies 2022, 15, 6939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dyachuk, E.; Goude, A. Simulating dynamic stall effects for vertical axis wind turbines applying a double multiple streamtube model. Energies 2015, 8, 1353–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pan, L.; Zhu, Z.; Xiao, H.; Wang, L. Numerical analysis and parameter optimization of j-shaped blade on offshore vertical axis wind turbine. Energies 2021, 14, 6426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ishie, J.; Wang, K.; Ong, M.C. Structural dynamic analysis of semi-submersible floating vertical axis wind turbines. Energies 2016, 9, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Borg, M.; Collu, M. Frequency-domain characteristics of aerodynamic loads of offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines. Appl. Energy 2015, 155, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, L.; Zhao, H.; Xu, W.; Yuan, R.; Guo, Y. Structural strength analysis of a tri-Floater floating foundation for offshore VAWT. J. Ocean Univ. China 2018, 17, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.; Liu, L.; Guo, Y.; Deng, W. Numerical prediction on the dynamic response of a helical floating vertical axis wind turbine based on an aero-hydro-mooring-control coupled model. Energies 2022, 15, 3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shires, A.; Kourkoulis, V. Application of circulation controlled blades for vertical axis wind turbines. Energies 2013, 6, 3744–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Buranarote, J.; Hara, Y.; Furukawa, M.; Jodai, Y. Method to predict outputs of two-dimensional VAWT rotors by using wake model mimicking the CFD-created flow field. Energies 2022, 15, 5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brownstein, I.D.; Wei, N.J.; Dabiri, J.O. Aerodynamically interacting vertical-axis wind turbines: Performance enhancement and three-dimensional flow. Energies 2019, 12, 2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Furukawa, M.; Hara, Y.; Jodai, Y. Analytical model for phase synchronization of a pair of vertical-axis wind turbines. Energies 2022, 15, 4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuang, L.; Lu, Q.; Huang, X.; Song, L.; Chen, Y.; Su, J.; Han, Z.; Zhou, D.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, Y.; et al. Characterization of wake interference between two tandem offshore floating vertical-axis wind turbines: Effect of platform pitch motion. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Stability triangle showing various foundation types (vertices) and comparing between VAWT and HAWT offshore concepts. Source: Arredondo-Galeana and Brennan [2].
Figure 1. Stability triangle showing various foundation types (vertices) and comparing between VAWT and HAWT offshore concepts. Source: Arredondo-Galeana and Brennan [2].
Energies 16 01602 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Micallef, D. Advancements in Offshore Vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Energies 2023, 16, 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041602

AMA Style

Micallef D. Advancements in Offshore Vertical Axis Wind Turbines. Energies. 2023; 16(4):1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Micallef, Daniel. 2023. "Advancements in Offshore Vertical Axis Wind Turbines" Energies 16, no. 4: 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop