Sizing with Technical Indicators of Microgrids with Battery Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. Optimization Techniques, Machine Learning, and Statistical Methods
2.1.1. Optimization Techniques
- Linear and Nonlinear Programming: Linear programming deals with optimization problems in which the objective function and constraints are linear. Nonlinear programming extends this concept to problems with nonlinear objective functions or constraints. Both approaches are widely applied in the optimal sizing of hybrid energy systems, considering costs, resource availability, and efficiency. Techniques such as Two-Constraint Linear Programming (TCLP) and Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) are examples of linear programming and its variations [1,18].
- Evolutionary Algorithms: Inspired by the process of natural selection and evolution, these algorithms are used to find approximate solutions for complex optimization problems by exploring populations of candidate solutions and applying genetic operators such as selection, recombination, and mutation to enhance solutions over time. The methodologies include the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and the Genetic Algorithm (GA) [2,4,9,19].
- Multi-Objective Optimization: When it comes to hybrid energy systems, multiple objectives often exist, such as minimizing costs, maximizing efficiency, and reducing emissions. Multi-Objective Optimization deals with the search for solutions that balance these competing objectives, resulting in Pareto-efficient solutions representing trade-offs among the objectives. The techniques include Mixed-Integer Conic Programming (MICP) and Adaptive Mixed Differential Evolution (AMDE) [16,20].
2.1.2. Machine Learning
- Neural Networks: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are computational models inspired by the functioning of the human brain. They are used to learn complex patterns from data, particularly useful in predicting energy production from renewable sources such as solar and wind. Deep learning Neural Networks and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) have also been applied to enhance the accuracy of predictions [15,20].
- Clustering: This is used to group similar data points into clusters or groups. In the context of hybrid energy systems, clustering is applied to identify behavior patterns of different system components. This methodologies include K-means Clustering (KC), Elman Neural Networks (ENNs), and Wavelet Neural Networks (WNNs) [15,17].
- Regression Model: Initially, regression analyses are commonly employed for prediction purposes, with their application closely overlapping with the domain of machine learning. Furthermore, regression analysis can be applied in specific cases to identify causal relationships between independent and dependent variables. Linear regression analysis can be divided into simple and multiple linear regression. Multiple linear regression is a statistical approach used to predict the outcome of a response variable by employing multiple explanatory variables. In contrast, simple linear regression isolates the influence of independent variables from the interaction among dependent variables [22,23].
2.1.3. Statistical Forecasting Procedures
- Univariate Models: A statistical approach that deals with data collected over time, relying on only one historical series. In the context of hybrid energy systems, time series analysis is widely used to model historical behavior and make future predictions of energy production and consumption, as seen in the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) technique [15].
- Causal Models or Transfer Function Models: Future values of a series are not determined solely via their past values but can also be influenced by series that have some relationship with it. In the case of electricity load consumption, including the relative price as a correlated series can contribute to a more comprehensive explanation of this phenomenon [24].
- Multivariate Models: These models not only consider the autocorrelation of the main series but also incorporate values from external series that enhance the forecast and analysis of this series. These external series can provide evidence of linear or nonlinear causality or correlation, contributing to clarifying how the values of the main series develop over time. An example of such a model would be one capable of simultaneously predicting the energy consumption in various service-providing utilities in the country [24,25].
2.2. Utilization of Established Software Solutions
- HOMER (Hybrid Optimization Model for Multiple Energy Resources): This is a tool designed to analyze and optimize hybrid energy systems. It enables the evaluation of various configurations of hybrid energy systems, considering renewable energy sources, energy storage, and other components. HOMER is widely employed to conduct economic and technical feasibility analyses for hybrid energy system projects [26].
- MATLAB: This is a numerical computing and programming platform that provides a flexible environment for implementing optimization and machine learning algorithms. It also allows for the integration of additional tools and the creation of custom models. MATLAB is a common choice for implementing and testing proposed solutions in hybrid energy systems [1,18,27].
3. Method and Data
- GQ: How is the methodology for sizing MGs with BESSs structured in a machine learning context?
3.1. Data Sources and Procedures for the Extraction of Articles
- Compendex (www.engineeringvillage.com, accessed on 5 September 2021);
- IEEE Xplore (www.ieee.org, accessed on 23 September 2021);
- Scopus (www.scopus.com, accessed on 11 October 2021);
- Science Direct (www.sciencedirect.com, accessed on 30 October 2021);
- Springer Link (www.springerlink.com, accessed on 15 November 2021).
- Keywords: (“battery energy storage system”) AND (“sizing” OR “dimensioning”) AND (“microgrid”) AND (“methodology” OR “method” OR “technique” OR “optimization” OR “approach”) AND (“artificial intelligence” OR “machine learning”);
- Period of search: 2017–2021.
3.2. Review Procedures
- (I)
- Inclusion Criteria:
- Works that report on the experience of the electric power sector;
- Works that include analysis with renewable sources;
- Works that show technical indicators;
- Works that contain financial indicators;
- Works using data to define the methodology.
- (II)
- Exclusion Criteria:
- Works that do not involve batteries;
- Works that are not in English;
- Works that are not available for consultation or download;
- Thesis, dissertation, poster, tutorial, and editorial;
- Duplicate and incomplete studies.
3.3. Filtering/Reviewing Process
- (1)
- Application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria;
- (2)
- Evaluation according to the title, abstracts, and keywords to select studies that hold relevant information to this systematic review;
- (3)
- Improvement in evaluating the articles, reading them with more criticality. The list in Table 1 will support scoring and ranking the selected papers.
3.4. Strategy for Extracting and Summarizing Results
- Article title;
- Names of authors;
- Year;
- Country;
- Institution;
- Research base;
- Application context;
- Methodology procedures;
- Indicators employed;
- AI methods;
- Results;
- Advantages and disadvantages of the model.
- RQ1: What methodologies for sizing hybrid energy systems with batteries are applied, and what applications are used? In which sector of the electrical system is it located: generation, transmission, distribution, or final customer?
- RQ2: How is battery technology impacting the hybrid power system sizing?
- RQ3: Which machine learning approaches of sizing hybrid power systems with batteries are employed?
4. Quantitative Analysis
Quantity of Articles
5. Discussion on Research Questions
5.1. What Methodologies for Sizing Hybrid Energy Systems with Batteries Are Applied, and What Applications Are Used? In Which Sector of the Electrical System Is It Located: Generation, Transmission, Distribution, or Final Customer?
- Evolutionary Algorithms;
- Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP);
- MATLAB.
- Backup;
- Quality of energy (reduction in energy losses);
- Reliability.
- Generation;
- Distribution;
- End-user.
5.2. How Is Battery Technology Impacting the Hybrid Power System Sizing?
- Lithium;
- Lead;
- Sodium.
5.3. Which Machine Learning Approaches of Sizing Hybrid Power Systems with Batteries Are Employed?
- Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs);
- Regression model;
- K-means clustering;
- Random Forest.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kumar, A.; Rizwan, M.; Nangia, U. Optimal sizing of renewable energy resources in a microgrid for a distributed generation system. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT), Rome, Italy, 27–29 November 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Rizwan, M.; Nangia, U. A new approach to design and optimize sizing of hybrid microgrid in deregulated electricity environment. Csee J. Power Energy Syst. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritchie, H.; Rosado, P. Electricity Mix. Our World Data 2020. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mix (accessed on 1 September 2023).
- Maulik, A.; Das, D. Determination of optimal size of battery energy storage system (BESS) for a renewable power based microgrid. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 17th India Council International Conference (INDICON), New Delhi, India, 10–13 December 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, A.U.; Zeb, S.; Khan, H.U.; Shah, S.S.U.; Ullah, A. Design and operation of microgrid with renewable energy sources and energy storage system: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Social Sciences (ICETSS), Bangkok, Thailand, 7–8 August 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shadman, A.; Tooryan, F.; Tasdighi, M.; Kenarangui, Y.; Kamalinia, S.; Collins, E.R. Microgrids: A Solution Towards Implementing Demand Response Programs. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC), College Station, TX, USA, 6–7 February 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Essayeh, C.; El-Fenni, M.R.; Dahmouni, H. Optimal sizing of a PV-ESS microgrid system under dynamic pricing of utility energy. In Proceedings of the 2018 19th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), Marrakech, Morocco, 2–7 May 2018; pp. 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silveira, A.S.; da Rosa Abaide, A.; da Silva, L.N.F.; Lucchese, F.C.; Hammerschmitt, B.K. Optimal Sizing of a PV-BESS Grid-Connected Microgrid in Southern Region of Brazil. In Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems (EPECS), Istanbul, Turkey, 5–7 October 2020; pp. 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alharbi, A.M.; Gao, W.; Alsaidan, I. Sizing Battery Energy Storage Systems for Microgrid Participating in Ancillary Services. In Proceedings of the 2019 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), Wichita, KS, USA, 13–15 October 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, A.A.; Yang, Y.; Kay, M.; Menictas, C.; Bremner, S. Synergy of solar photovoltaics-wind-battery systems in Australia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 152, 111693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorbani, N.; Kasaeian, A.; Toopshekan, A.; Bahrami, L.; Maghami, A. Optimizing a hybrid wind-PV-battery system using GA-PSO and MOPSO for reducing cost and increasing reliability. Energy 2018, 154, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, J.J.; Leahy, P.G. Sizing battery energy storage systems: Using multi-objective optimization to overcome the investment scale problem of annual worth. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2019, 11, 2305–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cen, B.; Cai, Z.; Liu, P.; Chen, Y. Penalty adjustment-based sizing method for flexible resources in isolated microgrids. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 228619–228627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schopfer, S.; Tiefenbeck, V.; Staake, T. Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles. Appl. Energy 2018, 223, 229–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Stephen Bremner, C.M.; Kay, M. Impact of forecasting error characteristics on battery sizing in hybrid power systems. J. Energy Storage 2021, 39, 102567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Han, G.; Zhu, H.; Liu, L.; Guizani, M. Adaptive DE Algorithm for Novel Energy Control Framework Based on Edge Computing in IIoT Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 17, 5118–5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, R.; Yildiz, B.; Leong, P.H.W.; Vassallo, A.; Dore, J. Residential battery sizing model using net meter energy data clustering. Appl. Energy 2019, 251, 113324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moghimi, M.; Garmabdari, R.; Stegen, S.; Lu, J. Battery energy storage cost and capacity optimization for university research center. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/IAS 54th Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical Conference (I&CPS), Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 5 July 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagheri-Sanjareh, M.; Nazari, M.H.; Gharehpetian, G.B. A novel and optimal battery sizing procedure based on MG frequency security criterion using coordinated application of BESS, LED lighting loads, and photovoltaic systems. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 95345–95359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohandes, B.; Acharya, S.; El Moursi, M.S.; Al-Sumaiti, A.S.; Doukas, H.; Sgouridis, S. Optimal design of an islanded microgrid with load shifting mechanism between electrical and thermal energy storage systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2020, 35, 2642–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiptoo, M.K.; Adewuyi, O.B.; Lotfy, M.E.; Ibrahimi, A.M.; Senjyu, T. Harnessing demand-side management benefit towards achieving a 100% renewable energy microgrid. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, R.; Zhang, B.-w. The research of regression model in machine learning field. MATEC Web Conf. 2018, 176, 01033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maulud, D.; Abdulazeez, A.M. A Review on Linear Regression Comprehensive in Machine Learning. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Trends 2020, 1, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esteves, G.R.T. Short Term Load Forecasting Models. Master’s Thesis, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro—PUC-RIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, R.R.C. Forecasting Multivariate Time Series Using an Interpretable Hybrid Model with Fuzzy Decision Trees. Master’s Thesis, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Engineering Department, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, L.H.S.; Silva, J.A.A.; López, J.C.; Arias, N.B.; Rider, M.J.; Da Silva, L.C.P. Integrated Optimal Sizing and Dispatch Strategy for Microgrids Using HOMER Pro. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference-Latin America (ISGT Latin America), Lima, Peru, 15–17 September 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setyawan, L.; Xiao, J.; Wang, P. Optimal Depth-of-Discharge range and capacity settings for battery energy storage in microgrid operation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Asian Conference on Energy, Power and Transportation Electrification (ACEPT), Singapore, 24–26 October 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Wang, W.; Xu, D. Optimal Sizing of Distributed Generations in DC Microgrids with Comprehensive Consideration of System Operation Modes and Operation Targets. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 31129–31140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EI-Bidairi, K.S.; Nguyen, H.D.; Jayasinghe, S.; Mahmoud, T.S. Multiobjective intelligent energy management optimization for grid-connected microgrids. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paliwal, P. Determining optimal component sizes for an isolated solar-battery micro-grid using Butterfly PSO. In Proceedings of the 2021 1st International Conference on Power Electronics and Energy (ICPEE), Bhubaneswar, India, 2–3 January 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero, R.C.; Pedrasa, M.A.A. An integrated clustering-milp-simulation approach for distributed energy resource sizing. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2019 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Genova, Italy, 11–14 June 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolluri, R.R.; de Hoog, J.; Abdulla, K.; Mareels, I.; Alpcan, T.; Brazil, M.; Thomas, D.A. Siting and sizing distributed storage for microgrid applications. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Dresden, Germany, 23–27 October 2017; pp. 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moncecchi, M.; Brivio, C.; Corigliano, S.; Cortazzi, A.; Merlo, M. Battery modeling for microgrid design: A comparison between lithium-ion and lead acid technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM), Amalfi, Italy, 20–22 June 2018; pp. 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.X.; Li, M.S.; Xu, Y.P.; Aslam, S.; Li, Y.K. Techno-Economic Planning and Operation of the Microgrid Considering Real-Time Pricing Demand Response Program. Energies 2021, 14, 4597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiehbadroudinezhad, M.; Rajabipour, A.; Cada, M.; Khanali, M. Modeling, design, and optimization of a cost-effective and reliable hybrid renewable energy system integrated with desalination using the division algorithm. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 429–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, L. Optimal Investment Decision for Cotton Farm Microgrid Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 31st Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC), Perth, Australia, 26–30 September 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakhtvar, M.; Al Hinai, A.; El Moursi, M.S.; Albadi, M.H. A vision of flexible dispatchable hybrid solar-wind-energy storage power plant. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2021, 15, 2983–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naidji, I.; Ben Smida, M.; Khalgui, M.; Bachir, A.; Li, Z.; Wu, N. Efficient Allocation Strategy of Energy Storage Systems in Power Grids Considering Contingencies. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 186378–186392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santana, N.H.B.; Amorim, A.E.A. PSO-Based Software for Optimal Nanogrid Sizing Considering Time-Of-Use Tariff. In Proceedings of the 2021 14th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON), São Paulo, Brazil, 15–18 August 2021; pp. 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohseni, S.; Brent, A.C.; Burmester, D. Off-Grid Multi-Carrier Microgrid Design Optimisation: The Case of Rakiura–Stewart Island, Aotearoa–New Zealand. Energies 2021, 14, 6522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Qiu, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, J. Trading-oriented battery energy storage planning for distribution market. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 129, 106848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bracale, A.; Caramia, P.; Mottola, F.; Carpinelli, G.; Proto, D. Probabilistic sizing of battery energy storage system in presence of renewable generation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS), Boise, ID, USA, 24–28 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulla, K.; De Hoog, J.; Muenzel, V.; Suits, F.; Steer, K.; Wirth, A.; Halgamuge, S. Optimal operation of energy storage systems considering forecasts and battery degradation. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2016, 9, 2086–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.; Mohd Nor, N.; Ibrahim, T.; Fakhizan Romlie, M. Sizing and placement of battery-coupled distributed photovoltaic generations. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2017, 9, 053501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parthasarathy, C.; Dasgupta, S.; Gupta, A. Optimal sizing of energy storage system and their impacts in hybrid microgrid environment. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference (ITEC-India), Pune, India, 13–15 December 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimmerle, D.; Santos, A.F.B.; Duggan, G.P. DC Approximate Models for Modeling Minigrid Systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), San Jose, CA, USA, 18–21 October 2018; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahiru, A.T.; Tan, C.W. Optimal sizing and techno-economic analysis of grid-connected nanogrid for tropical climates of the Savannah. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 52, 101824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soykan, G.; Er, G.; Canakoglu, E. Evaluation of the effect of weather conditions on optimal sizing of an isolated microgrid. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2020 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Madrid, Spain, 9–12 June 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, T.; Lu, W. Machine learning toward advanced energy storage devices and systems. Iscience 2021, 24, 101936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Cai, Z.; Xie, P.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. A Decomposition-Coordination Planning Method for Flexible Generation Resources in Isolated Microgrids. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 76720–76730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukumar, S.; Marsadek, M.; Ramasamy, A.; Mokhlis, H. Grey Wolf Optimizer Based Battery Energy Storage System Sizing for Economic Operation of Microgrid. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2018 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), Palermo, Italy, 12–15 June 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayfutdinov, T.; Ali, M.; Khamisov, O. Alternating direction method of multipliers for the optimal siting, sizing, and technology selection of Li-ion battery storage. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2020, 185, 106388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
ID | Quality Criteria | Answer |
---|---|---|
1 | Are the objectives or questions of the study clearly defined? | Y/N/P |
2 | Does the study clearly and unambiguously report the results? | Y/N/P |
3 | Does the study list primarily or secondarily use the methodologies and sizing indicators? | Y/N/P |
4 | Does the study explicitly address approaches to any artificial intelligence techniques? | Y/N/P |
5 | Does the study reference renewable energy? | Y/N/P |
6 | Does the study refer to hybrid power systems with battery energy storage systems? | Y/N/P |
7 | Does the study report on hybrid power systems of battery technologies? | Y/N/P |
8 | Does the article evaluate more than one application or operating system mode? | Y/N/P |
9 | Does the article describe all the steps of the methodology used? | Y/N/P |
10 | Does the methodology used in the article have synergy with the reality of the Brazilian electricity sector? | Y/N/P |
Article | Energy Sector | Location of BESS Integration | BESS Applications | Battery Technology | Machine Learning Applied | BESS Impact on MG | Sizing Methodology |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[1] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Balance between energy supply and demand | Uninformed | Not applicable | Reduction in transmission losses in energy, while ensuring the stability and reliability of the MG | Two-Constraint-Based Linear Programing (TCLP) and MATLAB |
[2] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Load demand support and energy arbitrage | Uninformed | Not applicable | Increase in renewable energy self-consumption and efficiency of the hybrid MG system, but the payback period and return on investment are affected | Advanced Grey Wolf Particle Swarm Optimizer (AGWPSO) and GWO |
[4] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Postponement of investment | Lead acid (PbA), sodium–sulfur (NaS), and lithium ion (Li-ion) | Not applicable | Helps improve the stability and reliability of the MG | GA and PSO |
[7] | Generation, distribution, and end-user | Microgrids | Load shifting, peak shaving, and Backup | PbA and Li-ion | Not applicable | Improves energy efficiency and enhances the reliability of the electrical system | Mathematical model |
[8] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Supports renewable generation and energy quality | Uninformed | Not applicable | Enhances MG benefits and provides reliability | Iterative technique |
[9] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Postponement of investment, ancillary services, and energy arbitrage | Li-ion | Not applicable | Reduction in MG costs and improved efficiency | MILP |
[11] | Generation and end-user | Residential | Backup and supply–demand balance | Uninformed | Not applicable | Reliable and sustainable energy supply for residential areas | PSO, GA, and Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) |
[12] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Load shifting | Li-ion | Not applicable | Improvement in efficiency, reliability, and financial performance, but it depends on proper sizing and implementation of the BESS | Paired comparison and rating method—Multi-Objective Optimization |
[13] | Generation | Microgrids | Power quality | Uninformed | Not applicable | Helps balance renewable energy generation with variable energy demand, improves the quality of supplied energy | Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) |
[14] | Generation, distribution, and end-user | Residential | Load demand support | Uninformed | Linear regression | Improved profitability of using BESS with the photovoltaic system | GA |
[15] | Generation | Hybrid plants | Generation forecasting/compensation | Generic model | ENN and WNN | Fast response time (for firm generation curve) | NN with optimization and ARIMA |
[16] | End-user | Industry | Power quality | Lead carbon (PbC) and Li-ion | Not applicable | Maximized benefits for end-users (industrial) and reduction in energy losses | OKEM, Adaptive Mixed Differential Evolution (AMDE), and Evolutionary Algorithms in MATLAB |
[17] | Generation and end-user | Distributed generation | Load demand support | Uninformed | Linear regression | Minimizing the energy bill cost | Load and consumption forecasting using machine learning techniques |
[18] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Peak shaving, power quality, and load shifting | Li-ion | Not applicable | Optimization of MG cost | Based on Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) in MATLAB |
[19] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Reactive control (frequency), to provide reliability and Backup | Li-ion—LFP | Not applicable | Improved stability and reliability of the electrical system during disturbances or power interruptions | GA |
[20] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Power smoothing and load shifting | Uninformed | Set of RNNs enhanced with an LSTM | Generation and load balance | Not detailed |
[21] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Load shifting | Uninformed | Scikit-learn in Python—Random Forest | Cost reduction | MILP |
[26] | Generation, distribution, and end-user | Microgrids | Load shifting and Backup | Li-ion | Not applicable | Economic advantages, reduced dependence on the main grid (energy purchase) | Not detailed |
[27] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Power smoothing, Backup, load shifting, and power quality | Li-ion | Not applicable | Reducing operating costs and increasing the reliability of energy supply to consumers | Determination of the optimal discharge range and battery capacity, considering the minimum operating cost of the system (MATLAB) |
[28] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Backup, load demand control, and supply–demand balance | Valve-Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) PbA | Not applicable | Cost reduction | PSO, HOMER Pro, and MATLAB |
[29] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Load shifting, supply–demand balance, and Backup | Uninformed | Not applicable | Reduction in the total system cost and reliability | Combination of Fuzzy Logic and Grey Wolf Optimization Swarm (FL-GWO) |
[30] | Generation | Microgrids | Supply–demand balance | Uninformed | Not applicable | Reduction in the total system cost and reliability | PSO |
[31] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Backup and supply–demand balance | Uninformed | Not applicable | Improved performance and reliability of distributed renewable energy systems in MG | MILP |
[32] | Generation, distribution, and end-user | Microgrids | Power quality | Uninformed | Not applicable | Reduction in operational costs of the MG | HOMER Pro and MILP |
[33] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Backup, provide efficiency and reliability for the MG | Li-ion and PbC | Not applicable | Reduction in operational costs of the MG, improve efficiency and reliability in energy supply | Poli.NGR—MATLAB |
[34] | End-user | Microgrids | Energy planning and Backup | Uninformed | Not applicable | Impact not detailed | HOMER Pro |
[35] | Generation | Microgrids | Backup, supply–demand balance, and provide reliability | Uninformed | Not applicable | Provides an efficient and reliable renewable energy solution for remote areas without causing environmental pollution | Splitting Algorithm for three configurations of renewable hybrid energy systems |
[36] | Generation, distribution, and end-user | Microgrids | Backup and seasonal demand | Li-ion | Not applicable | Reduction in costs and reliability | Optimization in the YALMIP—MATLAB toolbox |
[37] | Generation | Hybrid power plant | Reactive power control and Backup | Li-ion—NMC | Not applicable | Not specified | Not detailed |
[38] | Transmission | Grid | Contingency, ensuring system reliability, and ancillary services | Li-ion | Not applicable | Maintains electrical system stability in critical situations, reducing interruptions in power supply and improving the quality of energy provided to consumers | Maximum Minimum Flow Method |
[39] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids (nanogrid) | Power quality | Uninformed | Not applicable | Reduction in costs | PSO |
[40] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Ensure reliability in power supply | Li-ion | Not applicable | Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, improvement in the reliability of electricity supply, and promotion of the transition to renewable sources | GA and Tabu Search Algorithm |
[41] | Generation and distribution | Distributed generation | Energy planning | Uninformed | Backpropagation Algorithm—RNA | Impact on the future for distribution systems with DERs and BESSs participating in energy transactions in the decentralized market | Not detailed |
[42] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Load demand support | Li-ion | Not applicable | Reduction in costs, demand response, renewable generation, taxes, and tariffs | Probabilistic—Monte Carlo |
[43] | Generation and end-user | Distributed generation | Time-shift | Li-ion | Not applicable | Reduction in costs and maximizes the user’s investment value in electrical energy | Stochastic dynamic programming within a predictive control framework |
[44] | Distribution | Solar PV power plant | Reactive power control and time-shift | Uninformed | Not applicable | Improvement in power quality; reduction in energy losses; increase in voltage stability in distribution networks; assists with load demand when there is a gap between generation and load | Calculation through the percentage of the total daily average energy yield from the PV plant |
[45] | Generation, transmission, and distribution | Solar PV power plant | Load demand support | Li-ion | Not applicable | Improved microgrid performance, increased renewable energy penetration, reduced use of generators, and enhanced overall system efficiency | HOMER Pro |
[46] | End-user | Microgrids (minigrids) | Backup and supply–demand balance | PbA | Not applicable | Enhances reliability in electricity supply and reduces operational costs | Stochastic simulation of time series using meteorological data |
[47] | Generation, transmission, distribution, and end-user | Microgrids (nanogrids) | Reactive power control and Backup | Uninformed | Not applicable | Reduction in wasted energy generated from renewable sources, increasing the economic performance of the system | HOMER Pro |
[48] | Generation and end-user | Microgrids | Backup | Li-ion | Not applicable | Reliable and efficient energy supply | Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) Algorithm |
[49] | Generation, distribution, and end-user | Microgrids | Load demand control and energy arbitrage | Li-ion | Generative Adversarial Network Method (GAN) | Minimizes energy consumption costs | Greedy, GA, and Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) Algorithms |
[50] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Supply–demand balance and load demand support | NaS | Not applicable | Minimize the costs of the MG | MIP Algorithm |
[51] | Generation and distribution | Microgrids | Backup | Uninformed | Not applicable | Minimizes energy consumption costs | MILP, linear programming (LP), GWO, PSO, Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), and GA |
[52] | Generation, transmission, distribution, and end-use | Grid | Load demand support in an energy system | Li-ion—LFP, LMO, NMC, and LTO | Not applicable | Significant reduction in operational costs and required capacity size, along with improving the reliability of the electrical system | Mixed-Integer Convex Programming (MICP) and MATLAB |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Vasconcelos, A.; Monteiro, A.; Costa, T.; Rode, A.C.; Marinho, M.H.N.; Filho, R.D.; Maciel, A.M.A. Sizing with Technical Indicators of Microgrids with Battery Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review. Energies 2023, 16, 8095. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16248095
Vasconcelos A, Monteiro A, Costa T, Rode AC, Marinho MHN, Filho RD, Maciel AMA. Sizing with Technical Indicators of Microgrids with Battery Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review. Energies. 2023; 16(24):8095. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16248095
Chicago/Turabian StyleVasconcelos, Andrea, Amanda Monteiro, Tatiane Costa, Ana Clara Rode, Manoel H. N. Marinho, Roberto Dias Filho, and Alexandre M. A. Maciel. 2023. "Sizing with Technical Indicators of Microgrids with Battery Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review" Energies 16, no. 24: 8095. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16248095
APA StyleVasconcelos, A., Monteiro, A., Costa, T., Rode, A. C., Marinho, M. H. N., Filho, R. D., & Maciel, A. M. A. (2023). Sizing with Technical Indicators of Microgrids with Battery Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review. Energies, 16(24), 8095. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16248095