Next Article in Journal
Analyzing the Performance of Double Spiral Tube Ground Heat Exchangers in a Zero-Energy Building Using Measurement Data
Previous Article in Journal
Two Steps for Improving Reduced Graphene Oxide/Activated Durian Shell Carbon Composite by Hydrothermal and 3-D Ball Milling Process for Symmetry Supercapacitor Device
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Al2O3/SiNx Rear-Side Stacked Passivation on the Performance of Polycrystalline PERC Solar Cells

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Materials and Technology for Energy Conversion, College of Materials Science & Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
2
Ycergy (Suzhou) Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou 215121, China
3
Key Laboratory of Aerospace Information Materials and Physics (NUAA), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), Nanjing 211106, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(19), 6963; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196963
Submission received: 27 August 2023 / Revised: 25 September 2023 / Accepted: 30 September 2023 / Published: 6 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section A2: Solar Energy and Photovoltaic Systems)

Abstract

:
In recent years, polycrystalline passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) solar cells have developed rapidly, but less research has been conducted on the preparation process of their rear side passivation layers on standard solar cell production lines. In this work, a Al2O3/SiNx rear side stacked passivation layer for polycrystalline PERC solar cells was prepared using the plasma- enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) method. The effects of different Al2O3 layer thicknesses (6.8~25.6 nm), SiNx layer thicknesses (65~150 nm) and SiNx refractive indices (2.0~2.2) on the passivation effect and electrical performance were systematically investigated, which were adjusted by TMA flow rate, conveyor belt speed and the flow ratio of SiH4 and NH3, respectively. In addition, external quantum efficiency (EQE) and elevated temperature-induced degradation experiments were also carried out to check the cell performance. The results showed that the best passivation effect was achieved at 10.8 nm Al2O3 layer, 120 nm SiNx layer and 2.2 SiNx layer refractive index. Under the optimal conditions mentioned above, the highest efficiency was 19.20%, corresponding Voc was 647 mV, Isc was 9.21 A and FF was 79.18%. Meanwhile, when the refraction index was 2.2, the EQE of the cell in the long-wavelength band (800–1000 nm) was improved. Moreover, the decrease in conversion efficiency after 45 h LeTID was around 0.55% under the different refraction indices. The above results can provide a reference for the industrial production of polycrystalline PERC solar cells.

1. Introduction

Efficiency improvement and cost reduction are two major development directions in the photovoltaic (PV) industry. Decreasing the thickness of silicon wafers is an important means of reducing costs. Table 1 shows the prices of two wafers with common thicknesses of 110 μm and 130 μm, using N-Type 210 mm silicon wafers from TCL Zhonghuan Renewable Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (Tianjing, China). On the whole, the quotation for the thickness of 110 μm is less than 130 μm.
However, reducing the thickness of silicon wafers may make the minority carrier diffusion length greater than the thickness of the silicon wafer, resulting in more minority carriers diffusing to the back surface to be recombined and at the same time increasing the transmittance of long-wave photons, ultimately leading to a decrease in conversion efficiency. Thus, ensuring or even improving the conversion efficiency of solar cells while reducing costs is the top priority of this current work.
Thanks to the development of surface passivation technology [1,2], the PERC solar cell has become a mainstream product in the PV industry. PREC is based on the production of conventional solar cells by depositing a layer or stack of passivation layers (currently usually Al2O3/SiNx stack) using the PECVD method on the back surface instead of a conventional aluminum backfield [3]. Because of the high negative charge density of 1012–1013 cm−2 in the Al2O3 passivation layer [4], carriers in the underlying silicon decrease, resulting in the reduction in surface recombination velocity. So, Al2O3 is an excellent kind of field-effect passivation material, which has been confirmed by previous research [5,6,7,8]. However, to improve the firing stability, we often deposit the SiNx layer on Al2O3. Although Al2O3 and SiNx have different charge polarities, stacking of SiNx does not alter the negative charges of Al2O3. In addition, the capping layer of SiNx on rear-side stacked passivation of Al2O3/SiNx could protect the passivation layers from being damaged by metal pastes and increase the reflection of light, resulting in better optical generation [9,10,11,12].
Being able to obtain high-performance solar cells at a low cost has always been a development goal of the photovoltaic industry. PERC can offer an opportunity to achieve that, considering both its low-cost manufacture and high conversion efficiency [13]. Recent research papers have reported that rear-side passivation film parameters have a significant impact on the electrical performance of PERC. However, on one hand, most of them were small-scale experiments in laboratories and not batch experiments on standard solar cell production lines [8]. On the other hand, to improve solar cell performance, many researchers used monocrystalline silicon rather than polycrystalline silicon [14,15], which would lead to higher costs.
In this study, we carried out our experiment on a standard solar cell production line. We adjusted the TMA flow rate, conveyor belt speed and silane ratio to optimize the relevant parameters of Al2O3 and SiNx, exploring their impact on the performance of polycrystalline PERC.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of PERC Solar Cell

A batch of boron-doped P-type polycrystalline silicon wafers was selected to be used in this experiment. The silicon wafers were sliced using diamond wire-cutting technology, with a thickness of 180 ± 20 μm, a size of 156 mm × 156 mm and a resistivity of 1~3 Ω·cm.
The front side of the silicon wafers was first processed using a 10~20% NaOH solutions and then textured with a HF/HNO3 solution. After that, the textured wafers were diffused with POCl3, followed by a wet chemical etching process to remove phosphosilicate glass (PSG) and P-N junctions at the edges, resulting in a resistance of 110~130 Ω. The junction depth was about 3 μm. Then, the Al2O3 layer was deposited on the rear side and the SiNx layer was deposited on both sides of the silicon wafers by PECVD in 2in 1 MAiA (Meyer Burger Technology AG, Thun, Switzerland). The thickness and refractive index of the front side SiNx layer were kept at 75 nm and 2.0, respectively. On the rear side, Al2O3/SiNx rear-side stacked passivation was ablated by a laser (525 nm, DR) to form local openings. The dot-to-dot distance was 36 mm, and the line-to-line distance was 900 mm. Finally, standard screen printing was used to screen-print silver and aluminum on the front and the rear surfaces of wafers, which formed good ohmic contact through the firing process. Figure 1 shows the schematic of the process for the fabrication of PERC in this work.

2.2. Experimental Methods

To investigate the influence of the rear side of the Al2O3, SiNx layer thickness and SiNx refractive index on the electrical performance of polycrystalline PERC cells, we adjusted these parameters by controlling the flow rate of the TMA in the Al2O3 process chamber, the belt speed in the SiNx process chamber and the SiH4/NH3 flow ratios in the SiNx process chamber of MAiA, which is a rear-side passivation equipment. According to the above method, solar cells with different thicknesses of Al2O3 layer, SiNx layer and SiNx refractive index were fabricated. Then, the effects of Al2O3 layer thickness (6.8, 10.8, 16.0, 20.5 and 25.6 nm), SiNx layer thicknesses (65, 80, 100, 120 and 150 nm) and SiNx refractive index (2.0, 2.1 and 2.2) were evaluated. All experimental results in this article were set up with five parallel samples and the presented results were the average of those five experiments.
In the LeTID degradation experiment, the solar cells were put into a pre-degradation test chamber, with a light intensity of 800 W/m2, degradation temperature of 70 °C and accumulative degradation time of 45 h. Cells’ electrical performance parameters were measured using a German Halm tester under standard testing conditions after each degradation step, which were 2, 7, 17 and 45 h. It should be tested immediately when the temperature of the sample drops to 25 °C.

2.3. Characterization Methods

The passivization layer thickness and refractive index were measured by a TESCAN GES5E laser ellipsometer (TESCAN ORSAY HOLDING, a.s. Czech, Europe). The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of solar cells was investigated using the solar cell measurement system of Bentham PVE300 (Suzhou Vision Intelligence Technology Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China). The effective minority carrier lifetime mapping of passivated samples was characterized by equipment of WCT-120 (Sinton consulting Inc. Boulder, CO, USA). The electrical performance of solar cells was measured by a German Halm tester (h.a.l.m. Elektronik GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany) under standard testing conditions (AM1.5G, 1000 W/m2, 25 ± 2 °C).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Al2O3 Layer Thickness on the Passivation and Electrical Performance

The Al2O3 film is the first film to be prepared in the Al2O3/SiNx rear-side stacked passivation layer of polycrystalline PERC solar cells. The raw materials for preparing Al2O3 are TMA, N2O and Ar. Ar is a kind of inert gas that does not participate in chemical reactions and mainly plays a blowing role. TMA reacts with N2O in the reaction chamber to generate Al2O3 film, which is deposited on the silicon wafer substrate. To examine the influence of the Al2O3 layer thickness on minority carrier lifetime and electrical performance, a series of wafer samples with different Al2O3 layer thicknesses were fabricated by adjusting the TMA flow rate and maintaining the N2O flow rate. Table 2 shows the correspondence between the TMA flow rate and Al2O3 layer thickness. It can be seen that by increasing the TMA flow rate within a certain range, which was from 300 to 760 mg/min, the Al2O3 layer thickness increased continuously and showed a linear relationship with TMA flow rate.
To investigate the effect of Al2O3 thickness on the minority carrier lifetime of PERC before and after sintering, we continue to deposit a layer of SiNx film on the top of the Al2O3 film. The SiNx layer thickness and the refractive index in this section were set to 110 nm and 2.05, respectively. Figure 2 shows the minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering of the polycrystalline PERC solar cell with different Al2O3 layer thicknesses. The difference in minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering was significant at the same thickness. The minority carrier lifetime was in the range of 73~106 μs before sintering and was in the range of 156~238 μs after sintering. The sintering process resulted in an increase in minority carrier lifetime and the increment of that was from 83 to 132 μs under different Al2O3 layer thicknesses. When the film thickness was 10.8 nm, the increase in minority carrier lifetime was the largest, which was 132 μs.
The reason to explain the occurrence of the above phenomenon is that hydrogen atoms released from the Al2O3 layer can easily cross the Al2O3 layer and then enter into the silicon substrate to passivate the hanging bonds on the silicon surface. However, as the thickness of the Al2O3 layer was larger than 10.8 nm, the passivation effect would be unsatisfactory, as the diffusion of hydrogen atoms to the silicon bulk is blocked. At the same time, high-temperature sintering would promote the occurrence of this process. The above conclusions are consistent with the previous results [16,17]. Therefore, an appropriate thickness of Al2O3 film is necessary to achieve an excellent passivation effect. Based on comprehensive analysis, a TMA flow rate of 420 mg/min and Al2O3 film thickness of 10.8 nm are the most suitable parameters.
Table 3 shows the electrical performance parameters of the polycrystalline PERC solar cells with different Al2O3 layer thicknesses. As can be seen from the table, the conversion efficiency showed a trend of increasing firstly and then decreasing with the thickness of Al2O3 increasing. The best performance of the solar cells was achieved when the film thickness was 10.8 nm. Meanwhile, the highest efficiency was 19.48%, corresponding Voc was 0.6519 V, Isc was 9.2053 A and FF was 79.74. The overall trend is consistent with Figure 2, which indicates that the change in electrical performance of polycrystalline PERC cells with different Al2O3 layer thicknesses is mainly caused by the difference in the effect of backside passivation. Therefore, for polycrystalline PERC, the passivation effect and electrical performance were optimal when the thickness of the Al2O3 layer was 10.8 nm.

3.2. Effect of SiNx Layer Thickness on the Passivation and Electrical Performance

In this section, the substrate was first deposited with an Al2O3 layer of the optimum thickness of 10.8 nm, which was learned through Section 3.1. Then, the wafer substrate was transported to the process chamber via a conveyor belt on MAiA equipment to complete the SiNx deposition using the PECVD method. From Table 4 we can see that different SiNx layer thicknesses of 65, 80, 100, 120 and 150 nm can be obtained by changing the conveyor belt speed from 180 to 460 cm/min and maintaining constant process parameters such as SiH4 and NH3 flow ratio, microwave power, temperature and deposition rate in the SiNx process chamber. Due to the constant silane ratio, the refractive index remained unchanged and was still set to 2.05. From Table 4, we can see that the faster the conveyor belt speed, the thinner the SiNx layer.
Although a single layer of Al2O3 can already provide a good passivation effect, its thermal stability is poor. Covering a layer of SiNx can not only protect the Al2O3 layer to improve the thermal stability but also increase the thickness of the back surface layer and reduce light transmission. Similar to Al2O3, the thickness of SiNx also affects the efficiency of the polycrystalline PERC solar cells. Figure 3 shows the minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering with different SiNx layer thicknesses. It can be seen from the figure that there were some differences in minority carrier lifetime before sintering with different SiNx layer thicknesses. Before sintering, minority carrier lifetimes of the wafers were between 60 μs and 79 μs, while after sintering, the minority carrier lifetime of the wafers improved to 153~219 μs rapidly, which was more than twice as much as the cells without sintering. When the SiNx film thickness was 120 nm, the passivation effect was optimal.
To a certain extent, the thicker the rear SiNx, the better the passivation effect. At the same time, more photons would be reflected to the p-n junction if the photons were to reach the P-type silicon substrate and owing to that, more photon-generated carriers would be produced. However, if the SiNx layer were to be too thick, the probability of the photon being reflected to p-n would decrease because the thicker SiNx layer would have more internal defects within its body. Furthermore, this would result in a decrease in the efficiency of polycrystalline PERC solar cells. On the other hand, if the SiNx layer were to be too thin, the Al paste would locally fire through the SiNx layer during sintering. Then, additional parasitic Al contacts would be formed which would increase contact recombination, resulting in a decrease in the conversion efficiency of solar cells. As a consequence, an appropriate thickness of SiNx film is also necessary to achieve an excellent passivation effect. Based on comprehensive analysis, a conveyor belt speed of 220 cm/min and SiNx film thickness of 120 nm are the most suitable parameters.
Table 5 shows the electrical performance parameters of polycrystalline PERC solar cells with different SiNx layer thicknesses. The conversion efficiency showed a trend of increase before decrease, which was consistent with Figure 3. Therefore, for PERC with Al2O3/SiNx rear-side stacked passivation layers, the optimal thickness of SiNx was 120 nm. At this point, the conversion efficiency was 19.34%, and the corresponding Voc, Isc and FF were 0.6497 V, 9.2547 A and 79.02, respectively.

3.3. Effect of Refractive Index on the Passivation and Electrical Performance

In this section, the SiNx and Al2O3 layer thicknesses on the rear side of PERC were kept constant at 120 nm and 10.8 nm, respectively. By adjusting the flow ratio of SiH4 and NH3, SiNx layers with different refractive indices were prepared, which were 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. From Figure 4, we can see that the minority carrier lifetime increased with the increase in the refractive index. Before sintering, the minority carrier lifetime was between 51 and 63 μs. After sintering, the minority carrier lifetime increased rapidly and was almost three times that, which was between 152 and 185 μs. The maximum value of the minority carrier lifetime after sintering reached 185 μs at a SiNx refractive index of 2.2.
With the SiNx layer thickness remaining constant, increasing the flow ratio of SiH4 and NH3 would increase the refractive index of SiNx, which would increase the Si content in the SiNx layer. Furthermore, the concentration of the Si-H bond was also found to increase. As is known to all, Si-rich SiNx films have a higher hydrogen content, thus increasing the number of Si-H bonding, resulting in improving the passivation effect [18,19,20]. However, the refractive index cannot be too large because the greater the difference between the refractive index of the SiNx and air, the higher the reflectivity will be, which was found in previous studies [21].
Table 6 shows the electrical performance parameters of the polycrystalline PERC solar cells with different SiNx refractive indices. With the increase of the SiNx refractive index from 2.0 to 2.2, the conversion efficiency was changed from 18.73% to 19.20%. At the same time, Voc increased from 0.6408 V to 0.6470 V, Isc increased from 9.0769 A to 9.2100 A and FF increased from 79.10 to 79.18. The electrical performance parameters at the 2.2 refractive index are the most excellent. On the one hand, an increase in the refractive index of the backside SiNx would improve the passivation effect. On the other hand, a higher refractive index would reduce the light transmission and increase the light reflection on the backside. So, increasing the refractive index of the backside SiNx passivation layer within a certain range is beneficial to improving the electrical performance of the polycrystalline PERC solar cell.
PERC solar cells with different SiNx refractive indices (2.0, 2.1 and 2.2), which were taken from the above experiment, were used to explore the effect of the refractive index on EQE. The EQE results shown in Figure 5 indicate that solar cells exhibited an overall general increase in EQE with different SiNx refractive indices in the spectral measurement range of 300~730 nm, and the increasing trend was consistent. However, EQE reduced in the spectral range from 730 nm to 1100 nm. From Figure 5, we can see that the largest EQE was 96.18% instead of 100% at wavelengths of 650 nm, which could be attributed to reflection, front surface recombination, bulk recombination and so on. Further, optical losses for the longer wavelength (>650 nm) photons result from poor light-trapping architecture at the rear side. The increase in refractive index can improve the quantum efficiency of polycrystalline silicon PERC batteries in the long wavelength range (800~1000 nm), which was consistent with the increase in electrical performance parameters in Table 6.
The cells with different SiNx refractive indices obtained in 3.3 were used for light and elevated temperature degradation experiments. Figure 6 shows the trend of the conversion efficiency of polycrystalline PERC cells under 45 h LeTID with different SiNx refractive indices. From the figure, we can see that conversion efficiency of cells with different refractive indices declined quickly within the first 10 h, then the degradation rate gradually slowed down and finally became stable. The conversion efficiency of cells with a refractive index of 2.2 decreased from 19.20% to 18.66% after 45 h degradation, with a decrease of 0.54%. Meanwhile, the conversion efficiency of cells with 2.0 and 2.1 refractive indices decreased by 0.57% and 0.61%, respectively. On the whole, the degradation pattern of solar cell samples with different refractive indices is consistent and the conversion efficiency was still the highest at 2.2 SiNx refractive index after 45 h of degradation. The results showed that the different rear-side passivation conditions of SiNx refractive index basically do not affect the photovoltaic degradation of the polycrystalline PERC cells. Under the different refraction indices, the decrease in conversion efficiency was around 0.55%.
Until now, we have optimized the relevant parameters for the Al2O3/SiNx rear-side stacked passivation of PERC through the standard solar cell production line. To compare with other relevant research results, the optimal conversion efficiency of polycrystalline PERC batteries in other studies is shown in Table 7. The optimal conversion efficiency in our research was 19.20%, which can be seen in Table 6, under the optimized coating parameters of a 10.8 nm Al2O3 layer, 120 nm SiNx layer and 2.2 SiNx layer refractive index. Within the limited statistics, we can see that our polycrystalline PERC solar cell has certain advantages in conversion efficiency. In addition, due to our optimization about the parameters of Al2O3/SiNx, the stacked passivation film on the rear side of the solar cell was completed on a standard solar cell production line, so the optimized parameters in our research can be directly applied to batch production.

4. Conclusions

The parameters of Al2O3 and SiNx in the rear side passivation layer has a large influence on the electrical performance of the polycrystalline PERC cell. The best rear side passivation effect and electrical performance of the polycrystalline PERC cell were achieved when the Al2O3 layer thickness was 10.8 nm, the SiNx layer thickness was 120 nm and the SiNx layer refraction index was 2.2. Under the optimal conditions mentioned above, the highest efficiency was 19.20%, corresponding Voc was 647 mV, Isc was 9.21 A and FF was 79.18. Furthermore, the increase in refractive index can improve the quantum efficiency of polycrystalline silicon PERC batteries in the long wavelength range (800~1000 nm). The decrease in conversion efficiency after 45 h light LeTID was around 0.55% under the different refraction indices and the conversion efficiency was still the highest at 2.2 SiNx refractive index after 45 h of degradation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.F. and B.L.; methodology, W.F.; software, W.F. and L.Z.; validation, W.F., X.Z. and H.P.; formal analysis, W.F.; investigation, W.F.; resources, W.F.; data curation, X.Z. and H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, W.F.; writing—review and editing, W.F., B.L. and L.Z.; visualization, H.S.; supervision, H.S.; project administration, H.S.; funding acquisition, H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61774084), the Special Fund of Jiangsu Province for the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements (BA2022204), and the Double Carbon Special Fund of Jiangsu Province (BE2022006).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

Vocopen circuit voltage (V)
Iscshort-circuit current (A)
FFfill factor
ηconversion efficiency (%)

References

  1. Sen, C.; Hamer, P.; Soeriyadi, A.; Wright, B.; Wright, M.; Samadi, A.; Chen, D.; Stefani, B.V.; Zhang, D.; Wu, J.; et al. Impact of surface doping profile and passivation layers on surface-related degradation in silicon PERC solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells Int. J. Devoted Photovolt. Photothermal Photochem. Sol. Energy Convers. 2022, 235, 111497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Salem, M.; Boussaid, A.; Ben Hamida, M.B. Opto-electronic properties enhancement of silicon solar cells by iron doped ZnO nanoparticles. Silicon 2023, 15, 3543–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blankers, A. Development of the PERC solar cell. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2019, 9, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Patel, H.; Reichel, C.; Richter, A.; Masuch, P.; Benick, J.; Glunz, S.W. Effective charge dynamics in Al2O3/SiO2 multilayer stacks and their influence on silicon surface passivation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 579, 152175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Glunz, S.; Feldmann, F. SiO2 surface passivation layers-a key technology for silicon solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 185, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, K.; Borojevic, N.; Winderbaum, S.; Duttagupta, S.; Zhang, X.; Park, J.; Hameiri, Z. Investigation of industrial PECVD AlOx films with very low surface recombination. Sol. Energy 2019, 186, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fan, P.; Sun, Z.; Wilkes, G.; Gupta, M. Low-temperature laser generated ultrathin aluminum oxide layers for effective c-Si surface passivation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 480, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hsu, C.; Huang, C.; Cho, Y.; Wu, W.; Wuu, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, W.; Lien, S.; Ye, C. Efficiency improvement of PERC solar cell using an aluminum oxide passivation layer prepared via spatial stomic layer deposition and post-annealing. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 358, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Preu, R.; Lohmuller, E.; Lohmuller, S.; Saint-Cast, P.; Greulich, J.M. Passivated emitter and rear cell-devices, technology, and modeling. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2020, 7, 041315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Madani, K.; Rohatgi, A.; Min, K.; Song, H.; Huang, Y.; Upadhyaya, A.; Upadhyaya, V.; Rounsaville, B.; Ok, Y. Comparison of passivation properties of plasma-assisted ALD and APCVD deposited Al2O3 with SiNx capping. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2020, 218, 110718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Yao, Y.; Xiao, S.; Gu, X. Review of status developments of high-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 123001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sui, M.; Chu, Y.; Zhang, R. A review of technologies for high efficiency silicon solar cells. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1907, 012026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deng, W.; Ye, F.; Xiong, Z.; Chen, D.; Guo, W.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Altermatt, P.; Feng, Z.; Verlinden, P. Development of high-efficiency industrial p-type multi-crystalline PERC solar cells with efficiency greater than 21%. Energy Procedia 2016, 92, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahmad, W.; Tahir, S.; Ali, A.; Mahmood, K. A novel approach to reduce both front and rear side power losses in PERC solar cells using different combinations of transparent metal oxides. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 2821–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Dong, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z. Improved Al2O3/SiNx and SiO2/SiNx stack passivation layer structure PERC sc-silicon solar cells on mass production line. Energy Res. 2020, 45, 5806–5814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tong, R.; Zhang, S.; Liu, D.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X. Tuning back side passivation for enhancing the performance of PERC solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 231, 111319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wilking, S.; Herguth, A.; Hahn, G. Influence of hydrogenated passivation layers on the regeneration of boron-oxygen related defects. Energy Procedia 2013, 38, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balaji, N.; Park, C.; Lee, Y.; Jung, S.; Yi, J. Rear-side passivation characteristics of Si-rich SiNx for various Local Back Contact solar cells. Vacuum 2013, 96, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wolny, F.; Weber, T.; Muller, M.; Fischer, G. Light induced degradation and regeneration of high efficiency Cz PERC cells with varying base resistivity. Energy Procedia 2013, 38, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Helmich, L.; Walter, D.; Bredemeier, D.; Falster, R.; Voronkov, V.; Schmidt, J. In-situ characterization of electron-assisted regeneration of Cz-Si solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 185, 283–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cui, M.; Ma, J.; Wu, X. Multilayer SiNx:H films as passivation and anti-reflection coating for industrial PERC solar cells. Optik 2022, 268, 169841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sastrawan, R.; Pysch, D.; Bijker, M.; Delahaye, F.; Dielissen, B.; Eipert, W.; Gay, X.; Gortzen, R.; Hoffmann, A.; Latzel, B. Implementation of a multicrystalline ALD-Al2O3-PERC technology into an industrial pilot production. In Proceedings of the 28th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Paris, France, 30 September–4 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhao, S.; Qiao, Q.; Zhang, S.; Ji, J.; Shi, Z.; Li, G. Rear passivation of commercial multi-crystalline PERC solar cell by PECVD Al2O3. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 290, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, E.; Wang, H.; Yang, H. Comparison of the electrical properties of PERC approach applied to monocrystalline and multicrystalline sillicon solar cells. Int. J. Photoenergy 2016, 2016, 8982376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, P.; Zhang, X.; Sun, L.; Dai, S.; Yu, C.; Luo, X. Optimization of rear local Al-contacts on high efficiency commercial PERC solar cells with dot and line openings. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014, 515969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the process for PERC fabrication.
Figure 1. Schematic of the process for PERC fabrication.
Energies 16 06963 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering of polycrystalline PERC solar cell with different Al2O3 layer thickness.
Figure 2. Comparison of minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering of polycrystalline PERC solar cell with different Al2O3 layer thickness.
Energies 16 06963 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering with different SiNx layer thickness.
Figure 3. Comparison of minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering with different SiNx layer thickness.
Energies 16 06963 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering with different SiNx refractive index.
Figure 4. Comparison of minority carrier lifetime before and after sintering with different SiNx refractive index.
Energies 16 06963 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the external quantum efficiency of polycrystalline PERC cells with different SiNx refractive indices.
Figure 5. Comparison of the external quantum efficiency of polycrystalline PERC cells with different SiNx refractive indices.
Energies 16 06963 g005
Figure 6. Variation of light and elevated temperature induced degradation in conversion efficiency of polycrystalline PERC cells with different SiNx refractive index.
Figure 6. Variation of light and elevated temperature induced degradation in conversion efficiency of polycrystalline PERC cells with different SiNx refractive index.
Energies 16 06963 g006
Table 1. Quotation for N-Type 210 mm silicon wafers of different thicknesses.
Table 1. Quotation for N-Type 210 mm silicon wafers of different thicknesses.
DatePrice of Silicon Wafers with Different Thicknesses ($) Price Difference ($)
130 μm110 μm
9 August 20230.5380.5170.021
29 July 20230.5020.4820.020
9 July 20230.4780.4590.019
1 June 20230.6860.6570.029
11 May 20230.8340.8010.033
Table 2. Correspondence between TMA flow rate and Al2O3 layer thickness.
Table 2. Correspondence between TMA flow rate and Al2O3 layer thickness.
TMA flow rate (mg/min) 300420540650760
Al2O3 layer thickness (nm) 6.810.816.020.525.6
Table 3. Electrical performance parameters of polycrystalline PERC cells with different Al2O3 layer thickness.
Table 3. Electrical performance parameters of polycrystalline PERC cells with different Al2O3 layer thickness.
Al2O3 Layer Thickness (nm) Voc (V) Isc (A) FFη (%)
6.80.65069.1979.8419.43
10.80.65199.205379.7419.48
160.64959.191679.7619.38
20.50.64849.184979.7419.33
25.60.64689.144979.5619.15
Table 4. Correspondence between the conveyor belt speed and SiNx layer thickness.
Table 4. Correspondence between the conveyor belt speed and SiNx layer thickness.
Conveyor belt speed (cm/min) 180220260380460
SiNx layer thickness (nm) 1501201008065
Table 5. Electrical performance parameters of polycrystalline PERC cells under different SiNx.
Table 5. Electrical performance parameters of polycrystalline PERC cells under different SiNx.
SiNx Layer Thickness (nm) Voc (V) Isc (A) FFη (%)
650.64689.226678.9619.18
800.6499.226479.0919.27
1000.65039.232278.9519.29
1200.64979.254779.0219.34
1500.64899.201879.2119.25
Table 6. Electrical performance parameters of polycrystalline PERC solar cells with different SiNx refractive indices.
Table 6. Electrical performance parameters of polycrystalline PERC solar cells with different SiNx refractive indices.
SiNx Refractive IndexVoc (V) Isc (A) FFη (%)
20.64089.076979.118.73
2.10.64499.163779.119.03
2.20.6479.2179.1819.2
Table 7. Comparison of conversion efficiency of polycrystalline PERC in different research.
Table 7. Comparison of conversion efficiency of polycrystalline PERC in different research.
SourceηExperimental Subjects and ScaleRef.
Sastrawan et al.18.00Polycrystalline PERC, industrial pilot line[22]
Zhao et al.18.63Polycrystalline PERC, bench scale experiment[23]
Wang et al.18.61Polycrystalline PERC, bench scale experiment[24]
Liu et al.18.42Polycrystalline PERC, bench scale experiment[25]
In our research19.20Polycrystalline PERC, standard solar cell production line-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, W.; Shen, H.; Liu, B.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X.; Pan, H. Influence of Al2O3/SiNx Rear-Side Stacked Passivation on the Performance of Polycrystalline PERC Solar Cells. Energies 2023, 16, 6963. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196963

AMA Style

Fan W, Shen H, Liu B, Zhao L, Zhang X, Pan H. Influence of Al2O3/SiNx Rear-Side Stacked Passivation on the Performance of Polycrystalline PERC Solar Cells. Energies. 2023; 16(19):6963. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196963

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Weitao, Honglie Shen, Biao Liu, Lei Zhao, Xin Zhang, and Hong Pan. 2023. "Influence of Al2O3/SiNx Rear-Side Stacked Passivation on the Performance of Polycrystalline PERC Solar Cells" Energies 16, no. 19: 6963. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196963

APA Style

Fan, W., Shen, H., Liu, B., Zhao, L., Zhang, X., & Pan, H. (2023). Influence of Al2O3/SiNx Rear-Side Stacked Passivation on the Performance of Polycrystalline PERC Solar Cells. Energies, 16(19), 6963. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16196963

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop