Next Article in Journal
Alternative Surface-Mounted Permanent Magnet Topology for Reducing Voltage and Torque Harmonics in Shaft Generators
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Analyses of Multi-Family Residential Buildings in Various Locations in Poland and Their Impact on the Number of Heating Degree Days
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of a Solar Hybrid Electricity Generation System for a Rural Community in River State, Nigeria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Techno-Economic Optimization of Mini-Grid Systems in Nigeria: A Case Study of a PV–Battery–Diesel Hybrid System

by
Hillary Iruka Elegeonye
1,
Abdulhameed Babatunde Owolabi
2,3,
Olayinka Soledayo Ohunakin
4,5,
Abdulfatai Olatunji Yakub
2,
Abdullahi Yahaya
2,
Noel Ngando Same
2,
Dongjun Suh
2 and
Jeung-Soo Huh
2,6,*
1
Department of Energy Policy, Institute for Water and Energy Sciences Including Climate Change, Pan African University (PAUWES), Tlemcem 13000, Algeria
2
Regional Leading Research Center for Smart Energy System, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Convergence and Fusion System Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Republic of Korea
4
The Energy and Environment Research Group (TEERG), Mechanical Engineering Department, Covenant University, Ota 112104, Nigeria
5
Faculty of Engineering & the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa
6
Department of Energy Convergence and Climate Change, Kyungpook National University, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(12), 4645; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124645
Submission received: 6 May 2023 / Revised: 24 May 2023 / Accepted: 2 June 2023 / Published: 11 June 2023

Abstract

:
This paper presents a feasibility analysis of the technical, environmental, and economic sustainability of an existing mini-grid technology system in Nigeria. The study investigates the cost and other operational parameters of the Gbamu-Gbamu solar–battery–diesel hybrid mini-grid, specifically the 85 kWp solar PV installation in the Ijebu East Local Government area of Ogun state. Situated within the Owo forest in South-West Nigeria, the mini-grid aims to reduce the effects of global warming and promote sustainable technological development in rural communities by increasing energy access through renewable sources. To assess the system’s viability, this research utilized RETScreen Expert software to validate the techno-economic and environmental sustainability of the installed mini-grid solar–PV–battery–diesel system in the region. Climatic data for the study were obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The results demonstrate that the system is economically feasible and environmentally viable, as indicated by the positive net present value (NPV) and an average monthly irradiance of 4.78 kW/h/m2. Furthermore, the system achieved a 92.9% reduction in GHG emissions, provided a reasonable payback period of four years, and enabled a yearly electricity export of 203 MWh. These findings highlight the system’s potential to enhance energy access and mitigate climate change.

1. Introduction

This introduction briefly situates the study within a broader context and highlights how energy poverty has severely impeded socio-economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. This is evident in the limited access to electricity in many countries within this region. The situation in Nigeria is not an exception. Over 90 million Nigerians live in rural areas, and only approximately 26% of the rural population has access to electricity. In most cases, those with access pay the most exorbitant prices globally [1]. This poor access to electricity has impeded social and economic development and stagnated the livelihoods of the overall population of rural dwellers, as national development is highly affected by a lack of access to electricity [2]. Given technological advances and the increasing desire to improve quality of life, electricity has become fundamental for delivering essential day-to-day services such as water, healthcare, food, telecommunication, agriculture, education, and industrial processes. These amenities contribute immensely to the alleviation of poverty and the general quality of life in any community [3].
The Nigerian energy sector is currently a work in progress, requiring significant efforts in developing both generation and transmission infrastructure to improve energy access. According to the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), the energy generation sub-sector in Nigeria consists of 23 grid-connected operational generation plants. These plants have a total installed capacity of 10,396 MW, with a total available capacity of 6056 MW. Specifically, the thermal-based generation installed capacity is 8457.6 MW, with an available capacity of 4996 MW. Additionally, there is a total installed hydropower capacity of 1938.4 MW, with an available capacity of 1060 MW [4]. This translates to an energy mix predominately composed of thermal and hydro power generating sources, accounting for 75% and 25%, respectively. Currently, the contribution of other renewable energy sources in Nigeria, such as solar PV, is negligible, accounting for less than 1% of the total grid-connected energy generated and consumed.
In addition to the problem of poor access to energy, carbon-emitting non-renewable energy sources contribute significantly to Nigeria’s electricity generation. In 2020, gas-fired power plants constituted roughly 70% of grid electricity in Nigeria [5]. This absence of an eco-friendly environment leads to adverse climatic effects and contributes to climate change. The global threat of climatic change calls for action and necessitates the deployment of more environmentally sustainable renewable energy sources such as hydro power, solar, and wind energies. The goal is to reduce GHG emissions while generating energy sustainably. In line with this objective, the Nigerian Rural Electrification Agency (REA) is engaged in massive rural electrification programs in Nigeria, which are primarily based on clean, renewable energy [6].
To increase the contribution of renewable energy to the energy mix, the Nigerian government signed a power purchase agreement (PPA) in 2016 with 14 solar firms for solar power plants nationwide. As one of the government’s strategies, this agreement is expected to add at least 1.1 GW of electrical power to the grid upon completion of the projects [7]. The International Trade Administration (ITA) also notes concerns about the capacity of the available transmission infrastructure in the country to accommodate the expected additional power. Considering these circumstances, it is believed that decentralized off-grid options such as small solar plants are more viable for rural communities due to the poor transmission infrastructure of the national grid, as identified by the ITA [7]. This situation makes mini-grid solutions the breakthrough alternative for off-grid rural communities to increase energy access.
Overcoming the dual challenge of poor energy access and climate change requires Nigeria’s future energy supply to be technically affordable, economically feasible, socially acceptable, and environmentally sustainable while increasing energy access, especially in rural areas. Evidence from Owolabi et al. [8], using RETScreen analysis, showed that a grid-connected solar PV system is a more viable and dependable source of electricity in Nigeria, given the above-average solar irradiance of 5.96 kWh/m2/d in certain regions. The research showed that PV systems have a capacity factor of 21.7%, resulting in very high energy output exported to the grid, a reasonable payback period (13.6 years), and a reduction in GHG emission equivalent to 501.5 ha of forest-absorbing carbon. This research highlights the technical and economic feasibility of hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) in Nigeria, particularly in areas with high solar irradiance such as northern Nigeria.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that approximately 42% of the additional electricity generation capacity required to achieve universal energy access can be most economically and sustainably achieved through mini-grids [9,10]. Considering the growing population and expanding economic activities, this study aims to propose an optimized hybrid renewable-energy-based mini-grid model that meets the load demand of selected rural communities in Nigeria. The proposed model underwent technical and economic feasibility analyses of an existing system using RETScreen Expert.
Nigeria is geographically located on the West African coast of the Atlantic Ocean, within the Gulf of Guinea, with a latitude of 9.0820° N and a longitude of 8.6753° E. It spans over 923,768 square kilometers of landmass (356,669 sq mi), and the country extends approximately 1127 km (700 mi) from east to west and 1046 km (650 mi) from north to south. Nigeria has been a sovereign nation since 1960 [11], as shown in Figure 1. Its vast geographical expanse makes it one of the largest countries by land mass in the West African sub-region and one of the largest economies in Africa. Nigeria has an estimated population of 206 million [12], accounting for almost half of West Africa’s population. It is the most populous African country (Table 1) and globally ranks as the seventh most populated country, following China, India, the USA, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Brazil. Nigeria is also one of the most youthful countries globally.
Niger, Chad, Cameroon, the Atlantic Ocean, and Benin border Nigeria to the north, north-east, east, south, and west, respectively. Beneath Nigeria’s vast landmass lies millions of tons of unexploited natural energy resources, including bitumen, coal, petroleum, and natural gas. Nigeria accounts for a considerable proportion of Africa’s oil exports, with estimated oil reserves of 37 billion barrels, equivalent to 30% of Africa’s total oil reserves, making it Africa’s largest oil exporter [13]. Nigeria is also a major player in the production and exportation of natural gas, ranking first in Africa, followed by Algeria, ranking ninth and eleventh globally, respectively [14]. Figure 1b shows the solar irradiance incidence in Nigeria. The figure divides the country into three zones according to the amount of solar irradiance each region receives. The mini-grid system under study is positioned in Zone III, which experiences the lowest solar irradiance.
Figure 1. Map of Nigeria denoting solar radiation intensity. (a) Location of Nigeria on the African map [15], (b) Incident Solar radiation in Nigeria [16].
Figure 1. Map of Nigeria denoting solar radiation intensity. (a) Location of Nigeria on the African map [15], (b) Incident Solar radiation in Nigeria [16].
Energies 16 04645 g001
The importance of energy in daily life cannot be overstated. This claim holds because all daily activities rely on energy availability, accessibility, cost, and sustainability. Given the poor energy access in Nigerian rural areas [17], the rapid development of alternative energy sources is needed. Several renewable energy options, such as solar, wind, small hydro, and tidal, have been identified. However, many challenges, such as high payment default rates, regulatory issues, low electricity demand due to low productive activities in rural areas, and over-optimistic demand projections [10], are faced by rural areas. These challenges have significantly impeded the development and deployment of mini-grid systems in rural areas globally.
Other challenges have been identified, including financial factors such as the high initial cost of installation and ongoing operational and maintenance (O&M) expenses. Technical factors, such as optimal sizing, identification of base and peak loads, and technical expertise, have also impeded the widespread adoption of mini-grid systems in Nigeria [18]. These problems stem from the central grid’s inability to sufficiently supply sufficient energy to most rural areas, the failure of certain mini-grid projects, and the environmental impacts of the energy supplied under the high carbon-emitting business-as-usual energy scenario.
The failure of many mini-grid programs has been attributed to socioeconomic factors and regulatory lapses, making it essential to not only consider regulations and technology but also economic incentives for constructing mini-grids and evaluating the effectiveness of existing policies designed to enhance these incentives [19]. Optimizing hybrid mini-grid systems to tackle the identified challenges is relevant to commercially operated schemes involving private operators and community-based schemes [10].
In this research, we acknowledge the availability of reasonable solar irradiance in most parts of Nigeria, as identified by Dioha and Kumar in 2018 [18] as most abundant in Kano state and the lowest in Rivers State in the Northern and Southern parts of Nigeria, respectively. With good market conditions, we ascertained the economic feasibility of an isolated photovoltaic mini-grid system stationed in Gbamu-Gbamu, Ogun State, Nigeria. RETScreen Expert was used to conduct the techno-economic analysis (Economic and Technical feasibility) and environmental feasibility.
This study examined how technically and economically feasible renewable-energy-based microgrid systems are in meeting the load demand of the Gbamu-Gbamu community in Ogun State, Nigeria. It involved running a technical and economic feasibility analysis and an environmental assessment. While the technical and economic analysis assessed the feasibility and applicability of the project, the environmental assessment helped to establish the extent to which the project can reduce carbon emission, using the business as usual (BAU) scenario as a base case.
The specific objectives were as follows:
  • Evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of the installed plant.
  • Establish the level of environmental sustainability of the existing system.
  • Provide policy recommendations on the adoption of isolated mini-grid systems based on the findings.
By achieving the above objectives, the research aims to answer the following questions:
  • Is the system economically and technically feasible?
  • How environmentally sustainable is the existing system in Gbamu-Gbamu, Ogun State, Nigeria?
  • What are the likely policy implications of adopting isolated mini-grid systems in Nigeria?
A review of existing literature shows that the topic, “Techno-economic optimization of Mini-grid systems in Nigeria: a case study of a PV–battery–diesel hybrid system”, introduces fresh ideas in the energy field for Nigeria. Scholars have studied sustainable energy technologies and assessments in Nigeria [8,20,21]. These scholarly researches, among others, provide a foundation for further exploration of the aforementioned topic.
The topic extends beyond techno-economic optimization to encompass the assessment of environmental impacts. By optimizing PV mini-grids and conducting an environmental analysis, this study will examined the current state of Nigeria in the business-as-usual scenario and showed the potential feasibility of transitioning to cleaner and renewable energy integration through isolated hybrid mini-grid systems. The findings of this research will be instrumental in guiding the design of energy systems for remote rural communities where energy access is extremely limited and will serve as empirical literature for further studies in this area. Given the intensified emissions of GHG globally, this research is positioned to provide an environmentally friendly and sustainable energy solution while helping to solve the energy access problem in rural areas.
In line with the objectives of this research, which primarily focus on ascertaining the technical and economic feasibility of a renewable energy-based mini-grid system and its environmental sustainability in a rural community, the research objectives were focused on a rural community in Gbamu-Gbamu, Ogun State state, in Southwestern Nigeria.
The technical parameters that were optimized included sizing, load, system operation (see [22]), and identifying the best tracking angle or slope. For economic feasibility, ref. [8] estimated the payback period and the net present value of a Solar PV system in Nigeria. RETScreen Expert software was essential for estimating significant study parameters, including the carbon emissions that would be saved through the implementation of an optimized clean energy system. All estimations involved in this study were within the purview of RETScreen Expert.

1.1. Mini-Grid Systems

The critical role electricity plays in human lives cannot be overemphasized. With the increasing global population and expanding economic activities, the demand for electricity is becoming overwhelming. However, established public utilities have often concentrated more on urban areas, prioritizing the demands of the vocal and economically affluent class, while largely failing to address the needs of rural villages. As a result, in rural areas around the world where there is little to no access to the grid, individuals and communities now construct their electricity distribution systems, relying on isolated power sources such as solar, hydropower plants, or diesel/petrol generators.
The Energy Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) notes that eleven privately owned mini-grids were operational in Nigeria in 2017, serving approximately 9100 people with a cumulated capacity of approximately 236 kW [23]. Mini-grids promise to be the most cost-effective means of providing electricity to neighbourhoods or entire communities [24]. Over the past two decades, Mini-grid generation in Nigeria has gradually grown from fossil-based to renewable sources of energy. Beginning in the 1990s until the late 2000s, mini-grids in Nigeria were mostly powered by diesel. All 11 mini-grids in Nigeria are now based on renewable energy, and solar PV and battery technology are the dominant combinations. The 50 kW project by GVE in the Bisanti and the Ajima 20 kW Farms in Rije run on biogas and two others that use hybrid solar PV–diesel systems are notable [25,26].
A (hybrid) mini-grid system usually comprises three critical subsystems: (i) production, (ii) distribution, and (iii) demand, as shown in Table 2 [27]. The availability of energy resources, the desired services to be provided, and the characteristics of users collectively determine how a subsystem can vary in its architecture and components.
The mini-grid design directly affects the cost structure of the project. It defines the pricing of energy (in USD/kWh) produced and estimates overall service quality. The local conditions and the rural community’s needs must be analyzed in the early assessment of a successful design. This helps boost the level at which the community is involved and provides support for design considerations. Local involvement in the process, which considers the socio-economic and cultural environment, is essential to lower the risk of project failure. It also helps eliminate any negative perceptions of renewables among the region’s population, as they are aware of the project’s details [28].

1.1.1. Why a Hybrid Mini-Grid?

Research shows that combining different renewable energy technologies with different energy sources provides a competitive advantage compared to using a single technology [27]. Their research paper established that combining renewable energy sources such as solar and wind with a Genset made of diesel provided the least-cost solution. This is because the advantages of each technology complement each other, which is very accurate for intermittent energy sources such as the sun and wind. Since renewables do not run on fuel, fuel price or supply volatility does not affect their operation. However, renewable systems depend on the availability of specific natural resources at specific times and seasons, which are subject to natural phenomena. Therefore, they are non-dispatchable. On the other hand, diesel generators are dispatchable; they can deliver electricity within a schedule. Combining these two sources leads to the coverage of various shifting load profiles.
It has also been argued that combining various renewable sources such as solar, wind, and hydro makes sense in many scenarios [27]. For instance, solar PV collectors can be likened to seasonal fluctuations following sunlight availability, while wind power complements it in months with low irradiance. Considering daily fluctuations, solar energy production peaks around midday when the sun is intense, whereas wind turbines can operate based on the availability of wind irrespective of the time of the day or night. Introducing storage batteries significantly stabilizes the system and give room for days of autonomy by storing the energy, especially for periods of insufficient production.

1.1.2. Off-Grid Electrification

Approximately 1.6 billion individuals reside in rural and remote areas without access to electricity [9]. The absence of electricity significantly hampers the socio-economic progress of remote villages, resulting in a development gap compared to their urban counterparts. Expanding the national grid to these rural areas, which are often characterized by challenging terrains and low energy demands, can be economically inefficient and labor-intensive. Consequently, off-grid electrification has emerged as a viable solution for powering these underserved areas [29].
Off-grid electricity refers to all the means that people have used and are still using to generate electricity other than connecting to the national grid. In recent years, the use of domestic generator sets and renewables (solar, hydro, and wind power) for local electricity generation has gained significant attention beyond the local energy sector. Outstation home electrification has been realized, and generating electricity has become increasingly popular, especially in commercial applications [27]. Most rural areas that would have been otherwise difficult to electrify are now gaining electricity access due to the expansion of off-grid electrification technologies, including standalone renewable power systems. These systems sometimes incorporate advanced energy storage methods, and strategies for power control can be applied. Distribution and transmission can be further facilitated using a dedicated mini-grid or microgrid isolated from the primary electricity grid [30].
Research in Nigeria highlights off-grid renewable energy as a feasible solution for ensuring consistent and reliable electricity access, particularly in rural areas. It also presents an opportunity for Nigeria to reduce greenhouse gas emissions resulting from electricity generation. However, the lack of sufficient capital for investments in the off-grid renewable energy sector has impeded the progress of off-grid renewable electricity projects [31].
Several energy technology types, including renewables, are available in off-grid electricity systems (Figure 2) [27,28,29,32].
Small or micro-hydro: Small hydro is widely recognized as one of the most cost-effective technologies; however, its feasibility heavily relies on the availability of water resources and specific flow rate and volume conditions. This mature technology has been successfully deployed worldwide for over three decades.
Solar photovoltaic (PV): Solar PV is suitable for most locations around the world. It is considered easier to install, maintain, and scale up compared to other options. The biggest challenge is the higher initial investment costs.
Small wind power technology: Small wind power technology is another renewable energy-based option, often site-specific. This is because wind availability changes over time and varies dramatically in different places. Therefore, r a careful study of wind resources becomes imperative before a system is installed.

2. Materials and Methods

This section discusses the methodology of this study, which considers the parameters, design, and technical specifications of the energy systems under study. We also discuss the data collection method and the type of data collected. The data collected on technical parameters include electricity demand/consumption, power generation factor, PV module sizing, the energy required, inverter sizing, and battery capacity [8]. The methodology is discussed in detail under the headings below.

2.1. Energy Modelling Software: RETScreen Expert

RETScreen is an energy modelling software developed through collaboration between the Canadian Government and Natural Resources Canada’s CANMET Energy Diversification Research Laboratory (CEDRL). It aims to create awareness, promote innovation, and provide decision-support and capacity-building in renewable energy [8]. RETScreen is a collective effort of over 307 experts from the energy industry, government, and academia. RETScreen collaborates with various organizations, including the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP), among others [33]. Several versions of the software are available for public use, but users must have paid subscriptions to use the professional version of the software.
RETScreen has a broad range of applications in the energy field. Its primary applications include the analysis of the feasibility of energy projects, renewable energy (such as solar PV, wind energy, and hydro), and energy-efficient technologies [34]. RETScreen enables energy feasibility and performance evaluation of new and retrofit projects as well as monitoring and evaluating existing projects. It is suitable for technical and economic assessments, environmental and sensitivity, and risk analyses. RETScreen software is used to assess the financial viability of renewable energy projects by ascertaining if the revenue from the project can sustainably cover the cost over time. Three primary analysis tools are available on the RETScreen home page, including tools for benchmark analysis, feasibility analysis, and performance analysis. This study used RETScreen Expert Version 8 to conduct the techno-economic analysis of an isolated mini-grid in Nigeria. The choice of RETScreen was informed based on its aforementioned features, including its user-friendliness, which sets it apart from other similar energy modeling software in its suitability for achieving the research objectives. Figure 3 shows the workflow of RETScreen Expert and its components.

2.2. Research Method

This research involved a desk review method to conduct a literature review. Keywords such as “Hybrid energy systems”, “renewable energy system optimization”, “a techno-economic assessment of renewable energy systems”, etc., were used to search online sources such as google scholar, ScienceDirect, and other renowned online journals. More than 250 related research publications, conference proceedings, reports, articles, and dissertations were identified on the topic. The accessed documents were sorted based on their relevance. Ultimately, the relevance of each publication to the research topic was evaluated by reviewing its abstract and findings. The most relevant documents were selected, reviewed in the literature of the paper, and appropriately cited when necessary.
Additionally, data on the mini-grid plant under study were collected by the researchers. The developers and operators of the hybrid mini-grid provided access to the data for all the technical and economic parameters. Since the mini-grid is designed to serve a cluster of households, the operators provided the loading data. The remaining data used were secondary data accessed primarily from online data banks. The data were analyzed using RETScreen to enable the researchers to achieve the research objectives.

2.3. Data Collection

As described in the previous paragraph, the study used primary and secondary data to enable the researchers to achieve the research objectives. The primary data were collected first-hand, directly from the source involved. This research conducted a survey involving direct contact with the operators of a mini-grid system in Ogun state, Nigeria. All the data collected through this process were considered to be in the primary data category. The data in this category included the technical parameters and the economic and energy load, ollected directly from Gbamu-Gbamu mini-grid operators through interviews and a review of their records.
The secondary data used for the study included the climatic data for the mini-grid location, which was made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and incorporated into the RETScreen and HOMER software programs. The number of households and commercial users, as well as their energy demand, were obtained from the mini-grid operators. The mini-grid uses a prepaid metering system. Hence, the bills were used to estimate the average household energy consumption. This information was collected and documented to facilitate the effective management of the plant.

2.4. Study Area

This study was conducted in the rural community of Gbamu-Gbamu in Ogun state, Nigeria, where a solar PV of 85 kWp was installed. The Gbamu-Gbamu community is relatively large and comprises approximately 550 households and 5000 inhabitants. It is located in the Ijebu East Local Government Area. It is an agricultural community that produces, processes and trades various crops (cocoa, palm produce, plantain, kola nut, etc.) [35]. Table 3 shows the study area details based on NASA data.
The community is estimated to be 13 km away from the Expressway. Economic activities requiring electricity include agriculture, milling, hospitality, public, religion, and education. The alternative sources of electricity for the community are private diesel and petrol-powered generators. Given the high cost of petrol and diesel, these options are expensive to run. They are also not environmentally friendly due to the carbon emissions associated with the fuels. The hybrid mini-grid is designed to have a capacity of 85 kWp of PV, 67 kVA of Diesel Generator, and 5.6 km of low voltage grid (covering 80% of the village). The mini-grid design has been optimized to meet the demand of the village.

2.5. Load Estimation for the Power Site

Load estimation refers to the energy demand of the end-users of the electricity generated by the power plant. Properly designing a solar system requires calculating the total power and energy consumption of all loads supplied by the PV system [36]. They can be classified into domestic/household, commercial, and industrial users. The sum is the total energy demand for the project, which necessitates that the power plant is able to provide enough energy for its intended consumers.

2.5.1. Domestic/Households Load Estimation

The household load was estimated by observing the average electrical appliance usage by a typical (average) rural household in the region. Dominguez et al. (2018) estimated the average rural household energy consumption to be 1636 Wh/HH/day [37]. However, this figure was estimated to be lower in Gbamu-Gbamu. Out of the 550 households in the community, 493 are connected to the mini-grid system, which accounts for approximately 88% of the total households. Table 4 provides a list of the electrical appliances typically found in an average rural household. The load profile informs the plant operators of the peak loading hours for efficient management of the mini-grid system. The chart shows that the households’ peak loading occurs in the evening hours, which is typical for a rural setting when everyone returns home and utilizes electrical devices at night.
The multi-tier framework categorizes the listed appliances between tier 1 and tier 3 based on energy access. Most rural dwellers use electricity primarily for lighting, radio, and charging mobile phones, usually for a limited duration. Based on this, the estimated household consumption is calculated as follows:
265 × 493 = 130,645 watts (estimated household peak energy consumption per day = 130.64 kW).
To validate this estimate, the power plant recorded a peak monthly electricity consumption of 4591 kWh by households, which amounts to 153 kWh/d.

2.5.2. Commercial Load Estimation

The rural setting under study exhibited a significant level of commercial activity. Among the commercial customers were welders, motels, restaurants, grocery shops, and computer services. Using the prepaid metering system, the cumulative energy consumed by the 147 commercial customers was 3855 kWh per month. This results in a monthly average of 128 kWh/d. The plant also recorded a peak energy consumption of 338.2 kWh/d. Figure 4 shows the estimated average daily load profile of the commercial customers connected to the mini-grid under study. The commercial customers exhibited a higher energy consumption during the day, which was expected since their activities primarily take place during daylight hours.

2.5.3. Summary of Load Estimation per Category

The load estimation for both household and commercial users is summarized in Table 5.

2.6. RETScreen Enviro-Economic Analysis Parameters

A RETScreen expert was primarily employed to access the environmental and economic analysis of the power plant. Additionally, HOMER helped to determine the optimized size of the mini-grid system. Economic parameters such as discount rate and inflation rate were collected from the relevant authorities, such as the Central Bank of Nigeria and the National Bureau of Statistics. These data were further cross-referenced with the data from the Financial Market Infrastructure Group (FMDQ) to ensure accuracy. The RETScreen software is also programmed with the carbon emission rate of all countries worldwide. It can estimate the carbon emissions avoided by adopting a clean energy system [38]. The parameters used for the economic analysis are summarized in Table 6.

2.7. Solar Potential

The techno-economic analysis of the solar PV system was conducted using solar irradiance as the input variable to determine the electricity output of the power plant. There are different methods of obtaining data for this variable, as solar irradiance is specific to the plant location [39].
  • Ground data: Data collected using meteorological instruments on the site.
  • The RETScreen and HOMER software provide access to satellite meteorological data, which NASA collects and stores.
In this study, the NASA data were used directly from their database, eliminating the need to collect ground data for the analysis. The NASA database locates the nearest climate data location to the selected site. In this case, the selected climatic data location was at Ijebu Igbo, a council 26 km away from the solar PV site in Gbamu-Gbamu, Ijebu East local council, Ogun State, Nigeria. The results for daily average solar irradiance in the selected location are presented in Section 4.

2.8. Hybrid Energy System

All input data for the hybrid system were collected directly from the existing mini-grid system, as shown in the subsections.

2.8.1. Input Data for Solar System

The hybrid mini-grid system in Gbamu-Gbamu was designed to have a solar PV capacity of 85 kWp, indicating a peak rating of 85 kW/h. It utilizes 250-watt Monocrystalline solar panels manufactured by Jinko. The peak energy requirement of the plant is 338.12 kWh/d.
To achieve 85 kW (85,000 watts), a total of 340 panels are used in the solar array (340 × 250 = 85,000 watt).

2.8.2. Input Data for the Battery System

The details of the input data for the battery system are summarized in Table 7.
Therefore, battery capacity = T o t a l   W a t t   u s e d   p e r   d a y     d a y s   o f   a u t o n o m y b a t t e r y   e f f i c i e n c y     n o m i n a l   v o l t a g e     r a t e   o f   d i s c h a r g e = 392,000     1 0.85     0.6     12 = 64,052.2 Ah.

2.8.3. Parameters of the Diesel Generator

The hybrid system includes a 60-kW diesel Genset with an 85 kVA capacity, which consumes an average of 50 L of diesel and runs for approximately 3–4 h per day. The generator was manufactured by Marapco. Its daily fuelling constitutes a significant part of the operations and maintenance cost of the plant. The data showed that the average cost of petrol was 315 Naira (0.77 USD) per liter (Table 8).
The daily fuel consumption was thus calculated as: 315 × 50 = 15,750 Naira (38.414 and 1152.4 USD daily and monthly, respectively). These variables were pivotal in assessing the economic viability of the system and its environmental sustainability, given that diesel is a significant emitter of CO2.

2.8.4. Input Data for Converter

The total peak watt requirement of the power plant determines the inverter size used in the PV system. Ideally, the inverter should be large enough to accommodate the requirements of the system at all times, meaning the total peak watt must be adequately covered. Therefore, it is recommended to have an inverter that is approximately 30% larger than the total system load [36]. However, upon investigation, the inverter at the plant was found to have an 80 kW capacity. According to Chandel et al. (2014) [36], the plant’s peak energy rating was 85 kW daily. Therefore, the inverter should be 1.3 times larger to allow for an error factor:
85 × 1.3 = 110.5 kW

2.9. Limitations of the Study

Due to the methodology and scope of the study, the research has some limitations. These limitations include the following:
  • The result of the study is specific to the study location.
  • The estimation inputs are specific to the mini-grid system under study.
  • Some inputs used were subject to estimations and averages.
  • Rapidly changing inflation, discount, and exchange rates may result in different future results.
  • The analysis did not consider the effects of temperature and climate change on the PV over the lifetime of the project.

3. Results and Discussion

RETScreen Expert software was employed in this study to assess the technical, economic, and environmental viability of an existing 85 kWp hybrid mini-grid PV–battery–diesel system in the Gbamu-Gbamu rural community of Ijebu East Local Government Area in Ogun State, Nigeria. The location’s climatic data was assessed using RETScreen software and data provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). RETScreen used climatic data from the nearest location in Ijebu Igbo, which is approximately 26 km from the plant. Figure 5 shows the variation in the monthly average solar irradiance of the power plant location. The average monthly irradiance was recorded to be 4.78 kW/h/m2.

3.1. Technical Feasibility

The technical feasibility and sustainability of the hybrid system were determined by the amount of solar irradiance received by the plant and the electricity exported to the grid. To a large extent, the system’s efficiency and effective utilization were determined by the specifications of the products used [38]. The solar PV system used a fixed tracking mode for the location. The module was best optimized at a 9° angle for maximum annual average irradiance. The optimal angle was determined through an iteration process of several possible angles at the plant location. At this angle, the irradiance and total electricity export from the plant are maximized (4.78 kWh/m2) when the module is sloped to 9° compared to 4.73 kWh/m2 when the module is set horizontally. To calculate the parametric characteristics of the Jinko mono-si JKM-250m-60, RETScreen Expert software was employed. The selected solar panel model covered an area of 557 m2 and comprised 340 units. The parametric characteristics of the PV module are summarized in Table 9.
The amount of energy produced by the solar photovoltaic module primarily depends on the solar irradiance of the plant location, the number of sunny days, and the number of sunny hours [38], which eventually affects the system’s total annual exported electricity. An increase in the total electricity export positively affects the revenue generated by the plant, while a decrease in export leads to a decrease in revenue. The analysis conducted using RETScreen also showed that the annual solar radiation from the module, when set horizontally, is 1.73 mWh/m2, whereas when tilted, it would yield an annual 1.74 mWh/m2. The RETScreen analysis showed that the highest amount (12,953.55 kWh) of energy was exported in January, given the inherent high irradiance, while the lowest amount (8776.95 kWh) of energy was exported in July (Table 10). This distribution aligns with the weather condition in Nigeria, where July marks the peak of the rainy season. The range of monthly energy export was 4176.6 kWh.
According to a similar study conducted by Owolabi, Nsafon et al. (2019) [8] to validate the techno-economic and environmental sustainability of solar PV technology in Nigeria using RETScreen Expert software, we can conclude that the system is technically feasible with a calculated capacity factor of 17.4%.

3.2. Economic Viability

Economic analysis is one of the most critical aspects of developing a hybrid energy system and any other investment that aims to generate returns. It is a fundamental analysis conducted to determine economic viability and sustainability [8,40,41]. While a project may be technically feasible, it must be economically viable before proceeding. In the financial analysis carried out using the RETScreen software, the various financial parameters must be provided and inputted into the system to obtain the desired results. These variables include the inflation rate, debt ratio, interest rate, discount rate, reinvestment rate, initial investment, and operation and maintenance cost. These values and their sources have been discussed in Section 3 and are presented in Table 6.
We inputted the values of the economic variables listed. The software generated results for the internal rate of return (IRR) and the net present value (NPV). The RETScreen software calculated the annual life savings and other financial decision-making parameters. Mehmood et al. (2014) described the economic viability of a project as a measure of its NPV, IRR, and payback period, which are significant determinants of the financial viability of a project [38]. The outputs of the financial parameters are summarized in Figure 6.
The net present value (NPV) was calculated as the discounted difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over the project’s lifetime. Based on our results, this parameter is positive, indicating that the project is financially viable. This aligns with the results of similar research conducted in Nigeria [8]. Therefore, we can conclude that the project is financially and economically feasible [36,38,42]. The IRR, which measures a project’s profitability, has a positive value that exceeds the expected rate of return (see Figure 6). It can also be said that economically the project is acceptable.
The simple payback period is an economic analysis tool that refers to the time it takes to recover a project’s initial investment. In this case, the simple payback period is four years, indicating that the investment will return all costs by the fourth year, without considering the discount and inflation rates. Similarly, the equity payback is calculated in the model, which indicates how long it takes to recoup the initial investment from the cash flows generated by the project. In contrast to simple payback, equity payback includes the consideration of cash flows from the inception and the project’s leverage. The equity payback is therefore considered a preferred time indicator over the simple payback. This model’s equity payback is two years, as shown in Figure 6. This is economic sensible, as the project shows good economic sustainability and viability.

3.3. Emission Reduction Assessment

To determine the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction from the solar PV installation, RETScreen provides an emission analysis worksheet that takes inputs from the parameters and the country of the plant, as demonstrated in [8]. In certain cases where emission reduction leads to revenue incentives, the revenue receivable for GHG emission reduction is calculated by the system along with other indicators. Given the calculated transmission and distribution (T&D) losses of 7% and a GHG emission factor of 0.4325847 tCO2/MWh, there will be an 87.556 tCO2 reduction from the generation of 203 mWh annual energy by the mini-grid system.

Business as Usual vs. Proposed Case

In this study, one of our objectives was to assess the environmental sustainability of the existing mini-grid system. Figure 7 shows the environmental sustainability of the project compared to the base case: the business-as-usual scenario. The proposed case reduces GHG emissions by 92.9%, indicating that the 203 mWh annual energy produced from this hybrid energy system will generated a total of 87.556 tCO2 from other sources of energy. Achieving the sustainable development agenda of the United Nations by 2030 requires a serious commitment not only to tackling poverty, hunger, and inequality, but also to achieving inclusive growth by managing and utilizing the Earth’s natural resources sustainably. Table 11 outlines the environmental benefits of this energy system, showcasing the extent to which it contributes to environmental preservation. This represents the opportunity cost of the mini-grid system.
The values in Table 10 show what the project is achieving. This project will help achieve the set SGD goals if it is further adopted and implemented across the country.

4. Conclusions

The study was conducted to ascertain the technical and economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of an existing mini-grid in Nigeria. An extensive literature review was conducted in which several aspects of PV technology were reviewed, as well as the regulatory framework of the energy sector in Nigeria. The research area has aroused much interest among scholars in recent years, as literature exists on different aspects. Whereas existing literature covers various aspects of mini-grids and hybrid systems, this study presented the possibility of assessing an existing mini-grid system. The relevant data were obtained from the power plant developers and operators, then inputted into RETScreen Experts. The software modeled the data and produced results. The power plant was discovered to be both technically feasible and economically viable. The results were in line with existing literature on the subject, both within [8,41,43] and outside Nigeria [36,39,44]. The results also showed a massive cut in GHG emissions.
This paper aimed to conduct an ongoing assessment of the Gbamu-Gbamu mini-grid system, uncovering possibilities and research gaps in mini-grid systems in Nigeria and beyond. Building a mini-grid system is not enough, as most studies focus on pre-construction studies. Therefore, conducting environmental, technical, and economic assessments of mini-grid systems is essential after they have been constructed and operational for several years. This will help ensure that these systems remain fit to carry out their purpose of electrification without compromising environmental factors over time.

4.1. Recommendations

Following the results of the study, we recommend the following:
i.
There should be an inclusion of more renewable energy sources in the national grid through the national energy policy, as this will help to cut down on GHG emissions.
ii.
The research showed high energy export to the grid. This means that there is high solar potential in Nigeria. The adoption of solar PVs should be encouraged to increase energy access in Nigeria.
iii.
There should be incentives for the private investors in the mini-grid in the form of grants and tax holidays, since they will be helping to solve a global problem by providing electricity, which in turn increases economic activities in rural areas.
iv.
Public–private partnerships can play a significant role in increasing investments in mini-grids. By engaging in these partnerships, the government can alleviate some financial burdens and allocate public funds to other sectors.

4.2. Further Research Areas

Further research can be conducted on other existing mini-grid systems across Nigeria. There is also the need to compare the actual outputs of these existing mini-grids with their anticipated outputs. The forecast (estimated) outputs regarding power export to the grid and financial returns can be placed alongside the ongoing returns and outputs of the systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.I.E. and O.S.O.; methodology, H.I.E., A.B.O. and O.S.O.; validation, A.B.O., O.S.O., H.I.E., A.Y. and A.O.Y.; formal analysis, H.I.E., N.N.S., D.S. and J.-S.H.; investigation, H.I.E., A.B.O. and O.S.O.; resources, H.I.E., A.B.O., N.N.S., D.S., J.-S.H. and A.O.Y.; data curation, H.I.E.; writing—original draft preparation, H.I.E.; writing—review and editing, O.S.O., A.B.O., A.Y., A.O.Y., N.N.S., D.S. and J.-S.H.; visualization, H.I.E. and A.B.O.; supervision, O.S.O. and A.B.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), a grant funded by the Korean government Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (No. NRF-2021R1A5A8033165); the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20224000000150).

Data Availability Statement

Data is available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support offered by The Pan African University (African Union Commission) to actualize this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Bank. Access to Electricity, Rural (% of Population); The World Bank: Abuja, Nigeria, 2018; Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.ACCS.ZS?locations=NG (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  2. Adejumobi, I.A.; Adebisi, O.I.; Oyejide, S.A. Developing small hydropower potentials for rural electrification. IJRRAS 2013, 7, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  3. Oyedepo, S.O. Energy and sustainable development in Nigeria: The way forward. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2012, 2, 1–17. Available online: https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2192-0567-2-15 (accessed on 1 June 2023). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. NERC. Power Generation in Nigeria; Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission: Abuja, Nigeria, 2021. Available online: https://nerc.gov.ng/index.php/home/nesi/403-generation (accessed on 21 September 2021).
  5. AELEX. Nigeria: Power Sector Guide; Mondaq: Bristol UK, 2020; Available online: https://www.mondaq.com/nigeria/renewables/1021224/power-sector-guide (accessed on 31 December 2020).
  6. REA. Electricity Supply Statistics; Renewable Energy Agency: Masdar City, United Arab Emirates, 2021. Available online: https://rea.gov.ng/electricity-supply-statistics/ (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  7. ITA. Nigeria—Country Commercial Guide; International Trade Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/nigeria-electricity-and-power-systems (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  8. Owolabi, A.B.; Emmanuel, B.; Nsafon, K.; Roh, J.W. Validating the techno-economic and environmental sustainability of solar PV technology in Nigeria using RETScreen Experts to assess its viability. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2019, 36, 100542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. IEA. Key Energy Statictics 2018; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2018; Available online: https://www.iea.org/countries/nigeria (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  10. Peters, J.; Sievert, M.; Toman, M.A. Rural electrification through mini-grids: Challenges ahead. Energy Policy 2019, 132, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Encyclopedia, N. Nigeria—Location, Size, and Extent; Nations Encyclopedia. 2021. Available online: https://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Africa/Nigeria-LOCATION-SIZE-AND-EXTENT.html#ixzz747tKE8AK (accessed on 21 September 2021).
  12. World Bank. Population, Total—Nigeria; The World Bank: Abuja, Nigeria, 2020; Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=NG (accessed on 25 September 2021).
  13. World Factbook. 2021. Available online: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/nigeria/ (accessed on 25 September 2021).
  14. Anyanwu, J.; Abderrahim, K.; Feidi, A. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production in Africa and the Global Market Situation. Afr. Dev. Bank Group Chief Econ. Complex 2010, 1, 1–17. Available online: https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/Commodity%20Brief%20Oil%20and%20gas%20Final.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2021).
  15. Map of Nigeria. Available online: https://ontheworldmap.com/nigeria/ (accessed on 28 September 2021).
  16. Olayinka, S.; Ohunakin, M.S.A.; Olanrewaju, M.; Oyewola, R.O.F. Solar energy application and development in Nigeria: Drivers and barriers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 294–301. [Google Scholar]
  17. World Bank. Access to Electricity, Rural (% of Rural Population)—Nigeria; The World Bank: Abuja, Nigeria, 2019; Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.ACCS.RU.ZS?locations=NG (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  18. Dioha, M.O.; Kumar, A. Rooftop solar PV for urban residential buildings of Nigeria: A preliminary attempt towards potential estimation. AIMS Energy 2018, 6, 710–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sovacool, B.K. The political economy of energy poverty: A review of key challenges. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2012, 16, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ugwoke, B.; Adeleke, A.; Corgnati, S.P.; Pearce, J.M.; Leone, P. Decentralized Renewable Hybrid Mini-Grids for Rural Communities: Culmination of the IREP Framework and Scale up to Urban Communities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Azimoh, C.L.; Mbohwa, C. Optimized Solution for Increasing Electricity Access with Mini-Grid Technology in Nigeria. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 12, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Fioriti, D. Optimal sizing of a mini-grid in developing countries, taking into account the operation of an electrochemical storage and a fuel tank. In Proceedings of the 2017 6th International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP), Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, 27–29 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. ESMAP. Mini-Grids in Nigeria: A Case Study of a Promising Market; Esmap: Singapore, 2017; Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29016 (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  24. Mini Grid Manual. 2000. Available online: https://www.reseau-cicle.org/wp-content/uploads/riaed/pdf/Mini-Grid_Design_Manual-2.pdf (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  25. Grampus Heritage and Training Limited. Green Village Project; Grampus Heritage and Training Limited: Wigton, UK, 2020; Volume 233, Available online: https://www.grampusheritage.co.uk/projects/green-village/ (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  26. Ewepu, G. Firm Powers Rije Village with 20 KW Biogas, Prepaid Meters; Retrieved 12 October 2021; Powerlinks: Doha, Qatar, 2021; Available online: https://powerlinks.news/article/3b7ba4/firm-powers-rije-village-with-20kw-prepaid-meters (accessed on 27 July 2021).
  27. Wiemann, M.; Roland, S.; Glania, G. Hybrid Mini-Grids for Rural Electrification: Lessons Learned. 2014. Available online: https://www.ruralelec.org/sites/default/files/hybrid_mini-grids_for_rural_electrification_2014.pdf (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  28. Koirala, B.P.; Limbu, T.K.; Ortiz, B.; Tilak, K. Interconnected mini-grids for rural energy transition in Nepal. In Proceedings of the Micro Perspective of Decentralized Energy Supply, Berlin, Germany, 28 February 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. ESMAP. Technical and Economic Assessment of Off-Grid, Mini-Grid and Grid Electrification Technologies. ESMAP Tech. Pap. 121/07 2007. Available online: http://bit.ly/1MKGBIh (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  30. Jayamaha, P.C. Assessment of Technology Requirements for Off-Grid Rural Electrification. Master’s Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ole, N. Combating Electricity Poverty in Nigeria through Off-Grid Renewable Electricity: The Role of Financial Support Under the International Climate Change Regime. IJISSH 2017, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bhattacharyya, S.C.; Palit, D. The Nexus of Grids, Mini-Grids and off-Grid Options for Expanding Electricity Access. Oxf. Policy Manag. 2019, 1–42. Available online: https://energyeconomicgrowth.org/publication/nexus-grids-mini-grids-and-grid-options-expanding-electricity-access (accessed on 25 September 2021).
  33. Natural Resources Canada. (n.d). RETScreen; Retrieved 20 October 2021; Natural Resources Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2021. Available online: https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/software-tools/7465 (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  34. Lee, K.-H.; Lee, D.-W.; Baek, N.-C.; Kwon, H.-M.; Lee, C.-J.E. Preliminary determination of optimal size for renewable energy resources in buildings using RETScreen. Energy Elsevier 2012, 47, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Soremekun, B.A. Development of 85KwP Solar Minigrid GbamuGbamu, Ogun State. Rubitech 2020. Available online: https://slideplayer.com/slide/16386860/. (accessed on 25 September 2021).
  36. Chandel, M.; Agrawal, G.D.; Mathur, S.; Mathur, A. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Techno-economic analysis of solar photovoltaic power plant for garment zone of Jaipur city. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2014, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Dominguez, C.; Orehounig, K.; Carmeliet, J. One step further for electrifying rural households in Africa: A novel electricity demand modelling approach. In Proceedings of the 4th Building Simulation and Optimization Conference (BSO), Cambridge UK, 11–12 September 2018; pp. 1–7. Available online: http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BSO2018/2B-4.pdf. (accessed on 25 October 2021).
  38. Mehmood, A.; Shaikh, F.; Waqas, A. Modeling of the solar photovoltaic systems to fulfill the energy demand of the domestic sector of Pakistan using RETSCREEN software. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference and Utility Exhibition on Green Energy for Sustainable Development (ICUE), Pattaya, Thailand, 19–21 March 2014; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pareek, A.; Gidwani, L. Solar Irradiation Data Measurement Analysing Techniques. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Renewable Energy and Sustainable Environment, Pollachi, India, 10–13 August 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Olatomiwa, L.; Mekhilef, S.; Huda, A.S.N.; Ohunakin, O.S. Economic evaluation of hybrid energy systems for rural electrification in six geo-political zones of Nigeria. Renew. Energy 2015, 83, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Olatomiwa, L.; Mekhilef, S.; Huda, A.S.N.; Sanusi, K. Techno-economic analysis of hybrid PV—diesel—battery and PV—wind—diesel—battery power systems for mobile BTS: The way forward for rural development Techno-economic analysis of hybrid PV—diesel—battery and PV—wind—diesel—battery power. Energy Sci. Eng. 2015, 3, 271–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rehman, S.; Ahmed, M.A.; Mohamed, M.H.; Al-Sulaiman, F.A. Feasibility study of the grid connected 10MW installed capacity PV power plants in Saudi Arabia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Olatomiwa, L.; Mekhilef, S.; Ohunakin, O.S. Hybrid renewable power supply for rural health clinics (RHC) in six geo-political zones of Nigeria. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2016, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mittal, A.; Suhane, P.; Rangnekar, S. Optimal Sizing of Hybrid Energy System using Ant Colony Optimization. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. Payal. Suhane 2014, 4, 684–688. Available online: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/148175 (accessed on 20 October 2021).
Figure 2. An example of an off-grid solar home system (Source: [32]).
Figure 2. An example of an off-grid solar home system (Source: [32]).
Energies 16 04645 g002
Figure 3. A chart of RETScreen workflow (source: RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Figure 3. A chart of RETScreen workflow (source: RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Energies 16 04645 g003
Figure 4. Estimated daily commercial load profile in the study area (source: estimation using RETScreen).
Figure 4. Estimated daily commercial load profile in the study area (source: estimation using RETScreen).
Energies 16 04645 g004
Figure 5. Average monthly solar irradiance (source: estimation using RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Figure 5. Average monthly solar irradiance (source: estimation using RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Energies 16 04645 g005
Figure 6. Financial viability from RETScreen (source: estimations using RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Figure 6. Financial viability from RETScreen (source: estimations using RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Energies 16 04645 g006
Figure 7. CO2 emission in base case vs. proposed case (source: researchers’ estimation using RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Figure 7. CO2 emission in base case vs. proposed case (source: researchers’ estimation using RETScreen software, Version 8.1.2.13).
Energies 16 04645 g007
Table 1. Country profile of Nigeria.
Table 1. Country profile of Nigeria.
Country Profile
CountryFederal Republic of Nigeria
ContinentAfrica
Population206 million
Land mass920 square km
GDP422 billion
Life expectancy54.68
HDI0.539 (rank—161)
GDP per capita5186.72 USD
Energy access55.40%
Rural energy access25.55%
Urban energy access83.90%
Per capita energy access144.525 kWh
Installed generation capacity12,522 mW
Final electricity consumption30.84 TWh
Total CO2 emission104.27 mt
Sources: Compiled data from the World Bank and IEA.
Table 2. Subsystems of a mini-grid.
Table 2. Subsystems of a mini-grid.
SubsystemDescription
ProductionThe production subsystem includes energy generation components (renewable energy technology (RET) and Genset). This is where storage facilities such as battery systems are included.
The conversion technology system can include converters and rectifiers, as well as inverters for converting power from DC to AC.
The energy management system also falls into this category.
The capacity of the hybrid system is determined by the production subsystem (provision of electricity and connection of all the components)
DistributionThe distribution subsystem includes all the necessary distribution components. These components transport and distribute the generated electricity to all the connected users. At this point, deciding whether to base the distribution mini-grid on DC or AC is essential. The decision to build a single or three-phase grid is also paramount. These decisions are important because they will impact the cost of the project.
User or application sub-system or demand sub-systemThe equipment to be used on the end-user side is considered, including internal wiring, meters, grounding, and all devices connected to the electricity-generated mini-grid.
Source: [27].
Table 3. Summary of climatic data for plant location.
Table 3. Summary of climatic data for plant location.
UnitClimate Data LocationFacility Location
Name Nigeria—Ijebu IgboNigeria-Ogun-Ijebu East-Gbamu-Gbamu
Latitude°N7.07.0
Longitude°E4.04.0
Climate zone 1A—Very hot—Humid1A—Very hot—Humid
Elevationm8085
Source: RETScreen Expert.
Table 4. Power estimate for an average rural household in Gbamu-Gbamu.
Table 4. Power estimate for an average rural household in Gbamu-Gbamu.
S/NAppliancePower (W-H)QtyTotal Power (W-H)
1Lighting20480
2Fan/cooling50150
3Television80180
4Radio15120
5Miscellaneous50-30
s 265
Table 5. Load estimation.
Table 5. Load estimation.
ItemHouseholdCommercialTotal
Number of users493147640
Average daily electricity consumption 153 kWh128 kWh281 kWh
Average Monthly electricity consumption4591 kWh3855 kWh8446 kWh
Source: researchers’ compilation using data from the mini-grid operator.
Table 6. Parameters for economic analysis.
Table 6. Parameters for economic analysis.
Financial ParametersValueSource
Inflation rate 11.8%FMDQ
Project life20 yearsPlant Operators
Debt ratio42%Plant Operators
Debt interest rate5%Plant Operators
Discount rate5%Literature
Debt term7Plant Operators
Initial CostNGN 214,000,000 (@410/$)Plant Operators
Electricity export rate0.5 $Plant Operators
O&M5,500,000 (@410/$)Plant Operators
Electricity rateNGN 170–200/kWhPlant Operators
Table 7. Input data for the battery system.
Table 7. Input data for the battery system.
ParametersValue
Total battery watt-hours used per day 392.5 kWh
Battery loss15% (estimate)
Depth of battery discharge 40%
Nominal battery voltage12 V
Table 8. Input parameters of the diesel generator.
Table 8. Input parameters of the diesel generator.
ParametersInput Values NGNCurrent USD Equivalent
@410/$
Capital investment-N- 3,500,000 (estimate)8536.4
Fuelling price-N- 315 per liter0.77
Power rating60 kW
Capacity80 kVA
Daily fuel cost-N- 15,750
Monthly fuel cost-N- 472,3201152.4
Hours operated per day4 h (average)
Operational time15,000 h
Table 9. Summary of PV parametric configuration.
Table 9. Summary of PV parametric configuration.
PropertyValue
PV technology typeJimko mono-Si
Power capacity 85 kW
Manufacturer modelJMK-250
Number of units340
Efficiency15.27
Nominal operating temperature45
Temperature coefficient0.5
Solar collector area557 m2
Table 10. Irradiance and electricity export summary from the RETScreen software.
Table 10. Irradiance and electricity export summary from the RETScreen software.
MonthDaily Solar Radiation-Horizontal kWh/m2/dDaily Solar Radiation-Tited kWh/m2/dElectricity Export Rate USD/kWhElectricity Exported to the Grid kWh
January5.325.650.512,953.552
February5.485.680.511,696.595
March5.375.410.512.359.676
April5.215.120.511,349.411
May4.794.620.510,629.385
June4.153.980.58964.677
July3.883.750.58776.952
August4.043.950.59258.949
September3.963.950.58943.5961
October4.444.530.510,516.173
November4.955.200.511,564.911
December5.215.570.512,776.875
Monthly Average/Total4.734.780.50129,790.754
Table 11. Summary of the equivalences of 87.6 tCO2.
Table 11. Summary of the equivalences of 87.6 tCO2.
Environmental ParameterEquivalence
Cars and light trucks not used16
Tones of waste recycled30.2
People reducing energy use by 20%87.6
Barrels of crude oil not consumed 204
Acres of forest absorbing carbon19.9
Hectares of forest absorbing carbon8.1
Liters of gasoline not consumed37,620
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elegeonye, H.I.; Owolabi, A.B.; Ohunakin, O.S.; Yakub, A.O.; Yahaya, A.; Same, N.N.; Suh, D.; Huh, J.-S. Techno-Economic Optimization of Mini-Grid Systems in Nigeria: A Case Study of a PV–Battery–Diesel Hybrid System. Energies 2023, 16, 4645. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124645

AMA Style

Elegeonye HI, Owolabi AB, Ohunakin OS, Yakub AO, Yahaya A, Same NN, Suh D, Huh J-S. Techno-Economic Optimization of Mini-Grid Systems in Nigeria: A Case Study of a PV–Battery–Diesel Hybrid System. Energies. 2023; 16(12):4645. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elegeonye, Hillary Iruka, Abdulhameed Babatunde Owolabi, Olayinka Soledayo Ohunakin, Abdulfatai Olatunji Yakub, Abdullahi Yahaya, Noel Ngando Same, Dongjun Suh, and Jeung-Soo Huh. 2023. "Techno-Economic Optimization of Mini-Grid Systems in Nigeria: A Case Study of a PV–Battery–Diesel Hybrid System" Energies 16, no. 12: 4645. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124645

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop