Next Article in Journal
Sol-Gel Derived Di-Ureasil Based Ormolytes for Electrochromic Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Materials and Processes for Photovoltaic Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Knockout of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene in Fusarium oxysporum for Enhanced Ethanol Yield

1
College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
2
Key Laboratory of Swine Facilities Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin 150030, China
3
Department of Bioengineering, Heilongjiang Vocational College of Agricultural Technology, Jiamusi 154007, China
4
Department of Life Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(1), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010427
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022

Abstract

:
Acetic acid is the primary by-product generated from ethanol production by Fusarium oxysporum using glucose or xylose as a substrate. Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) is the critical enzyme in acetic acid metabolism. To decrease acetic acid yield in ethanol production, the 1509 bp DNA of aldh, encoding a 502 amino acid protein with a calculated molecular mass of 54.33 kDa and an isoelectric point of 6.21, was cloned from F. oxysporum. Sequence analysis confirmed that the screened proteins belonged to the ALDH family. A knockout vector, ∆aldh, containing positive (hygromycin resistance gene) and negative (thymidine kinase gene from the herpes simplex virus) selectable markers, was constructed. Ethanol production by the mutant (cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh) in glucose- and xylose-containing media was 0.46 and 0.39 g/g, respectively, and these yields were 16.93% and 34.63% higher than those by the wild-type strain (0.393 and 0.289 g/g). Furthermore, the acetic acid yield of the mutant was 3.50 and 3.01 g/L, respectively, showing a 23.10% and 39.55% decrease compared with the wild-type strain (4.308 and 4.196 g/L). The biomass of the mutant (4.05 and 4.52 g/L) was lower than that of the wild-type strain (4.71 and 5.97 g/L). These results demonstrated the potential use of the genetically stable mutant for industrial bioethanol production.

1. Introduction

Lignocellulose is a major component of biomass, comprising approximately half of the plant matter produced by photosynthesis and representing the most abundant renewable organic resource in soil. Annual lignocellulosic residue generation worldwide results in environmental pollution and loss of valuable materials that can be bioconverted to several value-added products [1], such as bioethanol. Lignocellulose primarily consists of three types of polymers, namely cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, which can be hydrolyzed and depolymerized using enzyme-mimicking nanoparticles for enhanced bioethanol production [2,3]. The prerequisite for using this method is to use an enzyme with high enzymatic activity.
Fusarium oxysporum is a species that is pathogenic in plants and not in humans/animals, possessing bio-control activity against fungal pests, some insects, and metabolites [4,5]. This species can infiltrate the lignin barrier of plants and express various enzymes, including cellulose, xylanase, β-glucosidase, pectinase, laccase, and lignin peroxidase, making it a promising microbial agent in consolidated bioprocessing systems [6,7]. It can convert glucose and xylose into ethanol [8] (Figure 1) and simultaneously saccharify cellulose to ethanol [9]. However, the ethanol production efficiency of F. oxysporum is low. To improve its ability to convert substrates to ethanol, several genetic mutants of F. oxysporum were constructed by overexpressing different enzymes of the sugar transporter [6,10], pentose phosphate [11,12], or Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas [13] pathways. However, acetate, a by-product of glucose and xylose fermentation by F. oxysporum, also leads to low ethanol yield.
Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) (EC 1.2.1.5) converts acetaldehyde into acetate. It is generally accepted that ALDH can only catalyze acetaldehyde oxidation, i.e., it is unable to reduce acetate; thus, this reaction is irreversible. This enzyme participates in ethanol metabolism in numerous microorganisms, such as Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus and Natronomonas pharaonis [14,15]. Control of aldA expression is crucial for the initiation and maintenance of an optimal catabolic flow from ethanol in Aspergillus nidulans [16]. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ald4p and Ald6p function in the production of acetate from acetaldehyde and are thus critical in acetyl-CoA production [17]. ALDH1 and ALDH2 catalyze the oxidation of the acetaldehyde produced during fermentation in S. cerevisiae [18]. In an aldh knockout mutant of S. cerevisiae, the acetic acid yield decreased [19]. In this study, we attempted to change the metabolic path of acetic acid to increase the ethanol yield of F. oxysporum.
The aim of this study was to investigate the ethanol yield in an F. oxysporum mutant strain during glucose or xylose fermentation, and to examine the possibility of increasing it via the deletion aldh. The engineered mutant strain may be a candidate microorganism with high ethanol yield for use in bioconversion processes.
SUT, sugar transporter; PHO, phosphoglucomutase; TAL, transaldolase; G3P, glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate; PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; ALDH, aldehyde dehydrogenase.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions

Fusarium oxysporum cs28 strain was stored in our laboratory. Fusarium oxysporum cs28pCAM-Pstal strain harboring the transaldolase (tal) from Pichia stipitis was used as a recipient strain for transformation [11]. Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 (Mingzhoubio Co., Ltd., China) was used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and grown in Luria-Bertani medium containing kanamycin (50 μg/mL) at 28 °C. Escherichia coli DH5α (Invitrogen, USA) was used for the construction, propagation, and amplification of plasmids and grown at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani medium containing either ampicillin (100 μg/mL) or kanamycin (50 μg/mL), depending on the resistance marker of the plasmid used. The plasmids pUC18 (Takara, Japan), pCSN43 [20], and pPZPtk8.10 [21] were used to construct the homogenous recombinant vector.

2.2. Cloning and Bioinformation Analysis of the aldh Gene

Using the ALDH protein sequence of Neurospora crassa [13], the sequenced F. oxysporum genome (http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/genome/fusarium_group/MultiHome.html (accessed on 8 May 2019)) was scanned using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). This revealed a 502-residue aldh protein with 82% amino acid sequence identity. Based on the aldh sequence of F. oxysporum, primers AldF (5′-CGA ATC ATC ATA CAT CCA CAA TG-3′) and AldR (5′-GAG TAT TTT GGT ACA GAT AGA CC-3′) were designed and used to isolate the relevant gene from F. oxysporum genomic DNA. The PCR product was amplified using a high-fidelity polymerase (Takara, Japan). The 1.6 kb PCR product was cloned into the cloning vector pMD18-T and then sequenced.
The open reading frame of the aldh was searched using the ORF program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html (accessed on 11 August 2019 )). The theoretical molecular mass and isoelectric point of the ALDH were calculated using the Protparam tool (http://us.expasy.org/tools/protparam.html (accessed on 11 August 2019)). The catalytic domain of the ALDH was identified by InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/InterProScan/ (accessed on 11 August 2019)). ALDH amino acid sequences from different fungi were aligned using the MultAlin program (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin (accessed on 3 December 2022)).

2.3. Construction of Homogenous Recombinant Plasmid and Transformation

Firstly, aldh was obtained using PCR amplification with P1 and P2 primers and the genomic DNA of F. oxysporum as a template. The gene was digested using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and BamHI (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The fragment was inserted into EcoRI and BamHI-cut pUC18, resulting in the plasmid pUC-aldh. Secondly, the hygromycin B resistance (hyB) gene cassette was obtained by PCR amplification using pCSN43 as a template and primers P3 and P4. The hyB gene cassette was then digested using NheI (Roche, Germany) and inserted into plasmid pUC-aldh, yielding the plasmid pUC-aldh-hyB. Thirdly, the aldh gene containing hyB gene cassette was amplified with primers P5 and P6 using the pUC-aldh-hyB plasmid as a template. The PCR fragment was subsequently digested using the restriction enzyme KpnI (Roche, Germany) and inserted into pPZPtk8.10, resulting in the binary homogenous recombinant vector pPZP-aldh-hyB. Table 1 outlines the primers of the construction vector used for targeted mutations of aldh.
The vectors pPZP-aldh-hyB and pPZPtk8.10 were transformed into A. tumefacients EHA105 using the freeze-thaw method [22], and transformants were selected on LB medium containing 100 μg/mL kanamycin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, and 20 μg/mL rifampicin. The pPZP-ald-hyB vector was extracted from the transformants of A. tumefacients, identified using PCR with P5 and P6 primers, and then digested using the restriction enzyme KpnI (Roche, Germany).

2.4. Agrobacterium Tumefaciens-Mediated Transformation and Screening of Fungal Mutants

Plasmid pPZP-aldh-hyB or pPZPtk8.10 (control) was transformed into F. oxysporum strain cs28pCAM-Ptal using Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 strain as a mediator, as described previously by Covert et al. [23].
Fungal genomic DNA was isolated as described by Karakousis [24]. The putative knockout mutants were screened in two steps. In the first step, the transformed F. oxysporum was cultured on dual selection plates, namely potato dextrose agar plates containing 100 μg/mL hygromycin (Roche, Germany) and 10 µM F2dU (Roche, Germany). In the second step, putative knockout mutants were screened from the dual selection plates using PCR with specific primer pairs P7/P8 and P1/P2 (Table 1). The PCR cycling conditions were 94 °C for 5 min; 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min for 32 cycles; and 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR product was then cloned into the pMD18-T vector and sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The mutant strain was designated as cs28pCAM-Ptal-∆aldh.

2.5. Genetic Stability of Transformants

To test the mitotic stability of the disrupted aldh in the F. oxysporum transformants, spores of the transformants were inoculated into 3 mL of PX medium (xylose, 20 g/L; potato, 200 g/L) and incubated at 28 °C with shaking at 120 rpm. After 4 days of growth, 50 μL of each culture was plated on potato xylose agar containing 50 μL/mL hygromycin B or on unamended potato xylose agar. Additionally, mitotic stability was tested on solid cultures by transferring the mycelium of each transformant to one edge of a PXA (xylose, 20 g/L; potato, 200 g/L; agar, 20 g/L) plate. Once the growth reached the opposite side of the plate, mycelium from the growing edge was transferred to PXA containing 50 μL/mL hygromycin B or to unamended PXA.

2.6. Fermentation Conditions

Fusarium oxysporum strain cs28 and mutant cs28pCAM-Ptal-∆aldh were prepared using PX medium (xylose, 20 g/L; potato, 200 g/L) at 30 °C with shaking at 140 rpm for 24 h. Glucose (20 g/L) and xylose (20 g/L) media were prepared separately. The composition of the fermentation media (pH 6.0) excluding the sugars was (g/L): yeast extract, 2; NaNO3, 10; MgSO4, 0.2; KH2PO4, 2; and CaCl2, 0.1. Fermentation was performed in sterile 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks at 30 °C. Each Erlenmeyer flask contained 50 mL of sugar medium and 5 mL of inoculum. All media were autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min before use. Samples of the culture were taken at different time intervals.

2.7. Analytical Methods

The dried cell mass was measured from 50 mL of cell suspension. The suspension was centrifuged, and the cell pellet was washed twice with distilled water and oven-dried overnight at 105 °C. The first supernatant was analyzed for ethanol and acetic acid concentrations using gas chromatography. Ethanol and acetic acid concentrations were measured using a GC-4890 gas chromatograph (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with an Inwax capillary column (Agilent, USA) and a flame ionization detector. Gas chromatography was conducted at an oven temperature of 70 °C and injection temperature of 200 °C with nitrogen as a carrier gas and hydrogen as a flaming gas. Glucose and xylose concentrations were determined using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid method [25]. Analysis of variance was performed using SAS 9.0 (SAS Inc., Kerry, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of aldh

The coding region of aldh was 1509 bp in length. It encoded 502 amino acids and had a calculated molecular mass of 54.33 kDa and a predicted isoelectric point of 6.21. The aldh sequence was deposited in the GenBank database with the accession number ACN65117. InterProScan analysis revealed that aldh had conserved ALDH active sites (InterPro acc. no. IPR016160), indicating that it is an ALDH.
Multiple sequence alignment of ALDH from 20 fungal species was conducted using the MultAlin program, and the results revealed that the amino acid sequences of these ALDHs were conserved, with identities ranging from 47% to 98%. Furthermore, the active sites of these different ALDHs were highly conserved. The consensus sequence of conserved site and NAD(P) binding site was TLE [T/L] GGKSP and IIPWN/W/K/AE/FTGS, respectively (Figure 2).
XP_002146930: Penicillium marneffei; XP_001216921: Aspergillus terreus; XP_001933249: Pyrenophora triticirepentis; ACN65117: Fusarium oxysporum; EED12292: Talaromyces stipitatus; XP_002153479: Penicillium marneffei; XP_001267163: Neosartorya fischeri; EDP50237: Aspergillus fumigatus; XP_001271754: Aspergillus clavatus; XP_001821214: Aspergillus oryzae; XP_001538600: Ajellomyces capsulatus; XP_001937452: Pyrenophora triticirepentis; XP_957264: Neurospora crassa; CAX40043: Candida dubliniensis; XP_001386665: Pichia stipitis; AAF82789: Cladosporium fulvum; XP_001931266: Pyrenophora triticirepentis; BAF57023: Aciculosporium take; XP_001272452: Aspergillus clavatus; EED16926: Talaromyces stipitatus.

3.2. Disruption of aldh in F. oxysporum

Considering that screening of a high number of transformants would be needed if aldh was disrupted using a vector lacking thymidine kinase (hv-tk), a negative selection vector (pPZP-aldh-hyB) harboring hv-tk was utilized. Supplementary Figure S1 shows the growth of the transformants on media containing F2dU and hygromycin. A total of 102 transformants were acquired on dual selection plates (Figure S1), with eight mutants exhibiting a colony diameter larger than 1.50 cm (Table 2).
For further identification of the transformants, the genomes of the mutants were extracted for PCR analysis using specific primer pairs P7/P8 and P1/P2 (Figure 3). The positions of primers P7/P8 and P1/P2 used to screen F. oxysporum transformants are indicated by solid arrows.
The numbers indicate the relative translation start codon (A of ATG as +1). P1–P8 indicate the PCR primers used to amplify the aldh and hyB cassette or to identify the disruption transformants. The hv-tk marker cassette included Aspergillus nidulans tryptophan C gene promoter (PtrpC), thymidine kinase gene from the herpes simplex virus (hv-tk), and A. nidulans tryptophan C terminator (TtrpC). The hyg marker cassette included PtrpC, hyB, and TtrpC. LB and RB indicate the left and right borders, respectively, of the T-DNA region in the binary vector pPZP-aldh-hyB.
Two transformants, T1 and T2 (lanes 1 and 2, respectively), and wild-type cs28 (lane 3) were firstly screened using PCR with specific primers P1 and P2 (lanes 1–3), and then confirmed with primers P7 and P8 (lanes 4–6). The molecular weight markers are indicated in lanes M1 and M2. When the specific primers P1/P2 and P7/P8 were used, fragments of approximately 3.9 kb and 1.3 kb were acquired, respectively, suggesting that homologous recombination leading to gene disruption had occurred. Further, these fragments were sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., and the results were confirmed to be accurate (Figure 4).

3.3. Sensitivity of the Mutants to Hygromycin and Their Mitotic Stability

A major prerequisite for the role of hyB as a selection marker in fungal transformation is the sensitivity of the host strain (F. oxysporum strain cs28) to hygromycin. To test this, either the spores or mycelia of the cs28 strain were inoculated on agar plates containing different concentrations of hygromycin. As shown in Table 2, the growth of F. oxysporum strain cs28 was inhibited at hygromycin concentrations higher than 50 μg/mL.
To identify whether knockout of aldh was stably inherited during vegetative growth, all mutants were grown for 1 week on PXA medium without hygromycin before being transferred back to PXA medium containing hygromycin. Growth without selection pressure did not affect the level of hygromycin resistance of any of the mutants, which indicated that the aldh knockout was mitotically stable. Furthermore, the mutants had a high resistance to hygromycin (100 μg/mL) (Table 3).

3.4. Fermentation on Single-Sugar Medium

To determine the effect of disruption of aldh on F. oxysporum, 5 mL of the mutants were inoculated in glucose- and xylose-containing media in a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL of medium and cultivated statically at 30 °C under oxygen-limited conditions. The mutants were able to ferment glucose or xylose to produce ethanol as well as acetic acid as a by-product. There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) in ethanol production between the cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh and cs28 strains grown in glucose- and xylose-containing media. The ethanol yield of the wild-type strain in glucose- and xylose-containing media was 0.393 and 0.289 g/g, respectively. The ethanol yields in glucose- and xylose-containing media of cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh increased by 16.93% and 34.63% compared with the wild-type strain, respectively (Figure 5a and 5c). Furthermore, the ethanol production of cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh in glucose-containing media (9.15 g/L) and xylose-containing media (7.82 g/L) was 89.71% and 85% of the theoretical value, respectively.
A significant difference in acetic acid yield between the cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh and cs28 strains was observed in glucose-containing media (p < 0.01) and xylose-containing media (p < 0.01). The acetic acid yields of the wild-type strain in glucose- and xylose-containing media was 4.308 and 4.196 g/L, respectively. The acetic acid yields of cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh in glucose- and xylose-containing media decreased by 23.10% and 39.55% compared with that of the wild-type strain, respectively (Figure 5b,d). Furthermore, the acetic acid production of cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh in glucose-containing media (3.50 g/L) was higher than that in xylose-containing media (3.01 g/L).
A significant difference in substrate utilization between the cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh and cs28 strains was observed in glucose-containing media (p < 0.05) and xylose-containing media (p < 0.01). The concentrations of residual glucose and xylose in the media of cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh decreased by 30.30% and 29.45% compared with the wild-type strain, respectively (Figure 6a,b).
There was a significant difference (p < 0.01) in cell mass between the cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh and cs28 stains in glucose- and xylose-containing media (Figure 6c). The cell mass of the wild-type strain in glucose- and xylose-containing media was 4.71 and 5.97 g/L, respectively. The cell mass of the cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh strain decreased significantly compared with that of cs28 in both media (p < 0.05). One possible reason is that aldh deletion led to an increase in the NADH pool and disturbed the carbon flux to the biomass. Moreover, the cell mass of the mutants in xylose-containing media (4.52 g/L) was larger than that in glucose-containing media (4.04 g/L) (Figure 6c).
Gene replacement is commonly used to generate precise deletion mutants to investigate a possible function of the deleted gene. In addition to factors such as the length of homologous DNA in the gene replacement cassette, G/C content of these flanks, transcriptional status of the targeted gene, and chromatin structure determined by the location of the targeted gene on the chromosome, the transformation method used also affects the efficiency of the targeted integration. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation (ATMT) has several advantages for gene manipulation in fungi, including high transformation efficiency and high homologous recombination frequency [26]. However, notably, gene disruption via homologous recombination was observed at a lower frequency [27]. Fungi with a low frequency of homologous recombination require the generation and screening of a large number of mutants for the identification of the desired mutant [28]. To circumvent this time-consuming process and facilitate the selection of homologous recombinants, a targeted gene replacement method based on ATMT followed by dual selection (positive and negative) of transformants was developed in this study. The HSVtk gene was originally used in animal cells to facilitate targeted gene replacement. It is a universal negative selection marker that has been utilized for testing many fungal species, such as Leptosphaeria maculans [21]. The HSVtk gene was chosen as a negative selectable marker for rapid identification of the putative targeted integrations, irrespective of whether the locus conferred a selectable phenotype, and the hyB gene was selected as a positive marker. In this study, the putative homologous recombinants were easily selected by subjecting transformants to both positive (HYG) and negative (F2dU) selection agents to increase the screening efficiency (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The screening results showed that the HSVtk could be used as a second selectable marker against ectopic transformants in Fusarium species.
Fusarium oxysporum, a well-known microorganism, can simultaneously saccharify straw to sugars and ferment sugars to ethanol. However, there are many bottlenecks that need to be addressed to increase the efficiency of its ethanol production from straw, such as the metabolic efficiency of xylose and glucose. The fermentative performance of various genetically modified F. oxysporum strains is presented in Table 4. Overexpression of the tal gene increased the ethanol yield of the transformants in xylose- and glucose-containing media; however, the acetic acid yield was also increased [11,12]. In S. cerevisiae, deletion of the aldh resulted in a decrease in acetic acid production [19]. These results were similar to those observed in this study (Figure 5b,d). The ethanol yield following glucose or xylose fermentation increased (Figure 5a,c). The mutants were mitotically stable and hence could be used in bioethanol production. However, there is a significant difference between bench-scale and industrial-scale batch fermentation. Determination and evaluation of the performance of an ethanol production process using the cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh strain will be essential in the future. Moreover, the fermentation ability of the mutants should be examined using sugar mixtures or lignocellulosic hydrolysates as substrates, and this could be a good strategy for cost reduction.

4. Conclusions

The HSVtk gene could be used as a second selectable marker against ectopic transformants in Fusarium species. The mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh showed genetic stability. Moreover, it can ferment xylose and glucose to ethanol with a lower production of acetic acid (as a by-product) than the wild-type strain, indicating its potential as a microbial source for bioconversion of lignocellulose materials into bioenergy.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/en16010427/s1, Figure S1: The resistance screening of aldh disrupted transformants using dual selectable markers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.F. and Q.Y.; methodology, X.H.; formal analysis, G.Z.; investigation, G.Z. and C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.F. and C.L.; writing—review and editing, M.W.; supervision, Y.S. and Q.Y.; project administration, Q.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Program in Educational Department of Heilongjiang Province (No. 12511062), Postdoctoral Science Starting Funds Program of Heilongjiang Province (No. LBH-Q17021), Doctoral Starting Funds Program of Northeast Agricultural University (No. 2012RCB95) and Key Scientific and Technological Project of Heilongjiang Province of China (No. 2021ZXJ03B05).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, C.; Sun, Y.; Yang, F.; Liu, J. Effect of solar irradiance on photo biochemical transformation process of direct absorption methane digester. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 172, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Singhvi, M.S.; Deshmukh, A.R.; Kim, B.S. Cellulase mimicking nanomaterial-assisted cellulose hydrolysis for enhanced bioethanol fermentation: An emerging sustainable approach. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 5064–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rajak, R.C.; Saha, P.; Singhvi, M.; Kwak, D.; Kim, D.; Lee, H.; Deshmukh, A.R.; Bu, Y.; Kim, B.S. An eco-friendly biomass pretreatment strategy utilizing reusable enzyme mimicking nanoparticles for lignin depolymerization and biofuel production. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 5584–5599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fu, Y.; Wu, P.; Xue, J.; Zhang, M.; Wei, X. Cosmosporasides F–H, three new sugar alcohol conjugated acyclic sesquiterpenes from a Fusarium oxysporum fungus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 36, 3420–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ibrahim, S.R.M.; Sirwi, A.; Eid, B.G.; Mohamed, S.G.A.; Mohamed, G.A. Bright Side of Fusarium oxysporum: Secondary Metabolites Bioactivities and Industrial Relevance in Biotechnology and Nanotechnology. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nugent, B.; Ali, S.S.; Mullins, E.; Doohan, F.M. A Major Facilitator Superfamily Peptide Transporter from Fusarium oxysporum Influences Bioethanol Production From Lignocellulosic Material. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Garzon, N.; Laure, H.J.; Rosa, J.C.; Cabral, H. Fusarium oxysporum cultured with complex nitrogen sources can degrade agricultural residues: Evidence from analysis of secreted enzymes and intracellular proteome. Renew. Energy 2018, 133, 941–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Panagiotou, G.; Christakopoulos, P.; Villas-Boas, S.; Olsson, L. Fermentation performance and intracellular metabolite profiling of Fusarium oxysporum cultivated on a glucose–xylose mixture. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2005, 36, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. M’Barek, H.N.; Arif, S.; Taidi, B.; Hajjaj, H. Consolidated bioethanol production from olive mill waste: Wood-decay fungi from central Morocco as promising decomposition and fermentation biocatalysts. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 28, e00541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, S.S.; Nugent, B.; Mullins, E.; Doohan, F.M. Insights from the Fungus Fusarium oxysporum Point to High Affinity Glucose Transporters as Targets for Enhancing Ethanol Production from Lignocellulose. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fan, J.X.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Z.H.; Huang, X.M.; Song, J.Z.; Chen, Z.X.; Sun, Y.; Liang, Q.; Wang, S. The characterization of transaldolase genetal from Pichia stipitis and its heterologous expression in Fusarium oxysporum. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2011, 38, 1831–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fan, J.-X.; Yang, X.-X.; Song, J.-Z.; Huang, X.-M.; Cheng, Z.-X.; Yao, L.; Juba, O.S.; Liang, Q.; Yang, Q.; Odeph, M.; et al. Heterologous Expression of Transaldolase Gene Tal from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Fusarium oxysporum for Enhanced Bioethanol Production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2011, 164, 1023–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Anasontzis, G.E.; Kourtoglou, E.; Mamma, D.; Villas-Boâs, S.G.; Hatzinikolaou, D.G.; Christakopoulos, P. Constitutive homologous expression of phosphoglucomutase and transaldolase increases the metabolic flux of Fusarium oxysporum. Microb. Cell Factories 2014, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Peng, H.; Wu, G.; Shao, W. The aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhE) in relation to the ethanol formation in Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus JW200. Anaerobe 2008, 14, 125–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cao, Y.; Liao, L.; Xu, X.-W.; Oren, A.; Wu, M. Aldehyde dehydrogenase of the haloalkaliphilic archaeon Natronomonas pharaonis and its function in ethanol metabolism. Extremophiles 2008, 12, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Flipphi, M.; Mathieu, M.; Cirpus, I.; Panozzo, C.; Felenbok, B. Regulation of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene (aldA) and Its Role in the Control of the Coinducer Level Necessary for Induction of the Ethanol Utilization Pathway in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 6950–6958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Remize, F.; Andrieu, E.; Dequin, S. Engineering of the Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Role of the Cytosolic Mg2+ and Mitochondrial K+ Acetaldehyde Dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in Acetate Formation during Alcoholic Fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3151–3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Wang, X.; Mann, C.J.; Bai, Y.; Ni, L.; Weiner, H. Molecular cloning, characterization, and potential roles of cytosolic and mi-tochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenases in ethanol metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteril. 1998, 180, 822–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lu, X.H.; Wang, D.L.; Fu, L.; Zhao, C.S. Gene deletion to decrease acetic acid of Saccharomyces cerevisiaes. Liquor. Mak. Sci. Technol. 2007, 3, 41–44. [Google Scholar]
  20. Staben, C.; Jensen, B.; Singer, M.; Pollock, J.; Schechtman, M.; Kinsey, J.; Selker, E. Use of a bacterial hygromycin B resistance gene as a dominant selectable marker in Neurospora crassa transformation. Fungal Genet. Newsl. 1989, 36, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gardiner, D.M.; Howlett, B.J. Negative selection using thymidine kinase increases the efficiency of recovery of transformants with targeted genes in the filamentous fungus Leptosphaeria maculans. Curr. Genet. 2004, 45, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jyothishwaran, G.; Kotresha, D.; Selvaraj, T.; Srideshikan, S.; Rajvanshi, P.; Jayabaskaran, C. A modified freeze–thaw method for efficient transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Curr. Sci. 2007, 93, 770–772. Available online: https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/93/06/0770.pdf (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  23. Covert, S.F.; Kapoora, P.; Holeea, M.; Brileya, A.; Nairn, C.J. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Fusarium circinatum. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karakousis, A.; Tan, L.; Ellis, D.; Alexiou, H.; Wormald, P. An assessment of the efficiency of fungal DNA extraction methods for maximizing the detection of medically important fungi using PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 65, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, L.; Zhang, X.; Tan, T. Influence of various glucose/xylose mixtures on ethanol production by Pachysolen tannophilus. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Michielse, C.; Arentshorst, M.; Ram, A.; Hondel, C.V.D. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation leads to improved gene replacement efficiency in Aspergillus awamori. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, J.-C.; Zhou, Q.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Liao, X.-G.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Jin, D.; Pei, Y. The size and ratio of homologous sequence to non-homologous sequence in gene disruption cassette influences the gene targeting efficiency in Beauveria bassiana. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mullins, E.D.; Kang, S. Transformation: A tool for studying fungal pathogens of plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2001, 58, 2043–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anasontzis, G.E.; Zerva, A.; Stathopoulou, P.M.; Haralampidis, K.; Diallinas, G.; Karagouni, A.D.; Hatzinikolaou, D.G. Homologous overexpression of xylanase in Fusarium oxysporum increases ethanol productivity during consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of lignocellulosics. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 152, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Metabolic pathways for glucose and xylose in F. oxysporum [10,12,13].
Figure 1. Metabolic pathways for glucose and xylose in F. oxysporum [10,12,13].
Energies 16 00427 g001
Figure 2. Multiple sequence alignment of conserved domain of aldehyde dehydrogenase from 20 fungal species. All of these aldehyde dehydrogenases are members of the aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily; their active sites and chemical binding sites are highly conserved. The asterisks refer to the conserved amino acid residues. A: NAD(P) binding site; B: active site; C: active site and NAD(P) binding site.
Figure 2. Multiple sequence alignment of conserved domain of aldehyde dehydrogenase from 20 fungal species. All of these aldehyde dehydrogenases are members of the aldehyde dehydrogenase superfamily; their active sites and chemical binding sites are highly conserved. The asterisks refer to the conserved amino acid residues. A: NAD(P) binding site; B: active site; C: active site and NAD(P) binding site.
Energies 16 00427 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of strategy for disruption of F. oxysporum aldh in this study.
Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of strategy for disruption of F. oxysporum aldh in this study.
Energies 16 00427 g003
Figure 4. PCR amplification of wild-type strain and transformants. Two transformants, T1 (lanes 1 and 5) and T2 (lanes 2and 6), and wild-type strain (lanes 3 and 4) were firstly screened by PCR with specific primers P1and P2 (lanes 1–3) and then confirmed with primers P7 and P8 (lanes 4–6). M1: Marker 4500; M2: Marker 2000.
Figure 4. PCR amplification of wild-type strain and transformants. Two transformants, T1 (lanes 1 and 5) and T2 (lanes 2and 6), and wild-type strain (lanes 3 and 4) were firstly screened by PCR with specific primers P1and P2 (lanes 1–3) and then confirmed with primers P7 and P8 (lanes 4–6). M1: Marker 4500; M2: Marker 2000.
Energies 16 00427 g004
Figure 5. Time course of ethanol and acetic acid concentrations during metabolism of glucose and xylose with mutants. Glucose fermentation (a,b); Xylose fermentation (c,d). square: mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh, circle: wild-type strain cs28.
Figure 5. Time course of ethanol and acetic acid concentrations during metabolism of glucose and xylose with mutants. Glucose fermentation (a,b); Xylose fermentation (c,d). square: mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh, circle: wild-type strain cs28.
Energies 16 00427 g005
Figure 6. Xylose and glucose utilization and cell growth profile for F. oxysporum strain cs28 and mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh. Cells were cultured in 50 mL of fermentation medium with 20 g/L of glucose (a) and 20 g/L of xylose (b), and dried biomass was weighed at 105 °C for 4 h (c). Symbols: ●: wild-type strain cs28; ■: aldh mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh; □: wild-type strain cs28; ▧: aldh mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh.
Figure 6. Xylose and glucose utilization and cell growth profile for F. oxysporum strain cs28 and mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh. Cells were cultured in 50 mL of fermentation medium with 20 g/L of glucose (a) and 20 g/L of xylose (b), and dried biomass was weighed at 105 °C for 4 h (c). Symbols: ●: wild-type strain cs28; ■: aldh mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh; □: wild-type strain cs28; ▧: aldh mutant strain cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldh.
Energies 16 00427 g006
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Primer
Designation
Sequence (5′-3′)Restricted Enzyme
P15′CCGGAATTCCGAATCATCATACATCCACAATG3′EcoRI
P25′CGGGATCCGAGTATTTTGGTACAGATAGACC3′BamHI
P35′CTAGCTAGCCCCTCGAGGTCGACAGAAGATGATA3′NheI
P45′CTAGCTAGCTCCGGCGTAGAGGATCCTCTAGAAA3′NheI
P55′GGGGTACCCGAATCATCATACATCCACAATGAGTCTAG3′KpnI
P65′GGGGTACCGAGTATTTTGGTACAGATAGACCATCTTCTC3′KpnI
P75′-CGGAAGCGAGAAACATCTCCTTAT-3′
P8 5′-AAGCTGAAAGCACGAGATTCTTCG-3′
Restriction sites are shown in lowercase.
Table 2. The resistance screening of aldh disrupted transformants using dual selectable markers. The mutants (T1–T8) were selected on PDA plate medium containing 100 μg/mL hygromycin, and then regenerated in the presence of 100 μg/mL hygromycin and 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (F2dU). +: growth.
Table 2. The resistance screening of aldh disrupted transformants using dual selectable markers. The mutants (T1–T8) were selected on PDA plate medium containing 100 μg/mL hygromycin, and then regenerated in the presence of 100 μg/mL hygromycin and 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine (F2dU). +: growth.
TransformantsHygromycin
(100 μg/mL)
5-Fluoro-2′-Deoxyuridine
(10 μM)
Diameter of Colony
T1++2.32
T2++2.10
T3++1.92
T4++1.85
T5++1.63
T6++1.55
T7++1.78
T8++1.93
Table 3. Sensitivity of wild-type and putative mutants of F. oxysporum on hygromycin medium.
Table 3. Sensitivity of wild-type and putative mutants of F. oxysporum on hygromycin medium.
Strains0Hygromycin Concentration (μg/mL)
255075100
cs28++---
cs28pCAM-Ptal-∆ald 13+++++
cs28pCAM-Ptal-∆ald 26+++++
Samples were incubated for 7 days. cs28: wild-type strain; cs28pCAM-Ptal-∆aldh 13 and cs28pCAM-Ptal-∆aldh 26: mutants with plasmid (pPZP-aldh-hyB); +: growth; -: no growth.
Table 4. Review of ethanol yield of different genetically modified Fusarium oxysporum strains and their fermentative performance in this study and from the literature.
Table 4. Review of ethanol yield of different genetically modified Fusarium oxysporum strains and their fermentative performance in this study and from the literature.
StrainsGene Up-Regulation/Down-RegulationSubstratesEthanol Yield (g/g)Acetic Acid Yield
(g/g)
Biomass (g/g)References
F. oxysporum Fx13endo-1,4-xylanase 2 /up-regulationCorn cob0.07--[29]
F. oxysporum Fx13endo-1,4-xylanase 2 /up-regulationWheat bran0.22--[29]
F. oxysporum cs28pCAM-Sctal4transaldolase/
up-regulation
xylose0.410.270.269[12]
F. oxysporum cs28pCAM-Sctal4transaldolase/
up-regulation
Rice straw0.250.16-[12]
F. oxysporum FF11phosphoglucomutase and transaldolase/
up-regulation
glucose--0.356[13]
F. oxysporum FF11phosphoglucomutase and transaldolase/
up-regulation
xylose -0.471[13]
F. oxysporum pSilent-1-FoPTR2-3 peptide transporter/
down-regulation
Wheat straw 0.04 0.13[6]
F. oxysporum pBARGPE1-FoPTR2-13peptide transporter/
up-regulation
Wheat straw0.09-0.18[6]
F. oxysporum pBARGPE1-FoPTR2-13peptide transporter/
up-regulation
glucose0.4- [6]
F. oxysporum pBARGPE1-FoPTR2-13,peptide transporter/
up-regulation
xylose0.25- [6]
F. oxysporum pBARGPE1-Hxt-6high affinity glucose transporter/
up-regulation
glucose0.4- [10]
F. oxysporum pBARGPE1-Hxt-6high affinity glucose transporter/
up-regulation
xylose0.32- [10]
F. oxysporum cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldhaldehyde dehydrogenase/
down-regulation
glucose0.450.1750.202The presentstudy
F. oxysporum cs28pCAM-Pstal-∆aldhaldehyde dehydrogenase/
down-regulation
xylose0.390.150.226The presentstudy
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, J.; Huang, X.; Zheng, G.; Liu, C.; Wang, M.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Q. Knockout of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene in Fusarium oxysporum for Enhanced Ethanol Yield. Energies 2023, 16, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010427

AMA Style

Fan J, Huang X, Zheng G, Liu C, Wang M, Sun Y, Yang Q. Knockout of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene in Fusarium oxysporum for Enhanced Ethanol Yield. Energies. 2023; 16(1):427. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Jinxia, Xiaomei Huang, Guoxiang Zheng, Changyu Liu, Ming Wang, Yong Sun, and Qian Yang. 2023. "Knockout of the Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene in Fusarium oxysporum for Enhanced Ethanol Yield" Energies 16, no. 1: 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop