Next Article in Journal
Fault Diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman Process with XGB-AVSSA-KELM Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Developments and Prospects of Fully Recessed MIS Gate Structures for GaN on Si Power Transistors
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying of Vision through Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Double-Glazed Window
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Flyback Converter Using a D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
2
Mechanical and Mechatronics Systems Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu 31040, Taiwan
3
Department of Material Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(9), 3197; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093197
Submission received: 18 March 2022 / Revised: 14 April 2022 / Accepted: 25 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Wide Bandgap Technologies for Power Electronics)

Abstract

:
The flyback converter with its active cell balancing topology for charging lithium-based batteries in Electrical Vehicles (EV) have been adopted recently into the industry. Electrical Vehicle battery charging requires high current operation in continuous current mode and hence, the power loss on the Schottky diode rectifier on the secondary side determines the power conversion efficiency. The depletion mode (D-mode) GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier proposed in this paper has been used to replace the Schottky diode on the secondary side of the flyback converter in order to improve the power conversion efficiency. This synchronous rectifier regulates the forward voltage drop of an external switch to about 100 mV per ampere of current flow with no concern to threshold voltage. The first challenge of converting the D-mode GaN HEMT as a synchronous rectifier is that the normally-on device must be off when the primary side inductor of the flyback converter is initially charging the magnetic energy. That is, the rectifier must behave as the normally-off device during its initialization stage. The second challenge is that the D-mode GaN HEMT must switch off as soon as the secondary current becomes zero. The third challenge is posing a fast recovery feature to reduce the drain-source voltage rise on the primary side switch, which suffices to be the main reason as to why the D-mode GaN HEMT is used instead of MOS devices. The proposed depletion mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier is verified to be able to overcome all challenges and in result becomes a candidate for the synchronous rectifier.

1. Introduction

The flyback converter has been widely adopted because of its simple structure and high conversion efficiency [1,2,3,4]. Many applications require a large DC current with a galvanic isolation, hence the popularity of the flyback converter. For pursuing high efficiency, the use of flyback converters with high-efficiency GaN transistors are reported and the efficiency improvement has been verified in some works [5,6]. Moreover, synchronous rectification using GaN to replace the output diode has low conduction loss and show better performance [7].
GaN devices have some superior material properties resulting in low gate charge, small output capacitance, and zero reverse recovery characteristics that provide them the capability of fast switching and low loss [8,9]. However, there are several challenges needed to be overcome for using the D-mode GaN HEMT, such as the negative gate voltage needing to be applied to let normally-on device operate as normally-off [10,11,12], and the third quadrant loss of GaN FETs needs to be solved when it is used as a rectifier [9,13]. Few studies have presented several methods to let normally-on devices act as normally-off [10,11,12], like using self-powered gate drives [10], biased charge pump gate drives [11], or cascode structure [12]. For addressing the third quadrant loss of GaN FETs, optimizing the dead time can improve the overall system performance [9,13]. Therefore, TI implemented an ideal diode mode function [9] to solve a high reverse voltage drop in GaN resulting from conducting current in the third quadrant when the gate is off. Furthermore, an adaptive dead-time control strategy is proposed to minimize the dead-time [14,15], and an active clamp method is presented for increasing the efficiency [16].
Previous works have already suggested implementing the developed P-Cascode GaN HEMT module with the biased charge pump gate drive [17] to synchronous buck converter [18]. Moreover, the GaN-switching based cascode GaN HEMT and the modified GaN-switching based cascode GaN HEMT with only two diodes and one capacitor are used on the flyback converter [12]. Based on these mentioned works, an insight of the CCM, DCM mechanism and zero current switching of flyback converter are implemented to yield higher power efficiency [19]. Taking synchronous rectifier method into consideration is normally used to obtain higher power conversion efficiency. Especially, using GaN transistors as synchronous rectifier to replace the Schottky diode showing a great performance in reducing loss [7]. However, several challenges, like, as blocking the current flowing to the battery during the inductor charging period, and self-sustainable on the secondary side when the battery is on low voltage or even empty, need to be concerned with in the battery charging system. Nevertheless, with the benefit of the GaN material property, anti-series (back-to-back) connected transistors [20] can be simplified with using only one D-mode GaN due to no body diode characteristic [13].
The aim of this study is to provide the proposed D-mode GaN HEMT topology as a synchronous rectifier to get a better power conversion efficiency. To conquer the aforementioned challenges for using D-mode GaN HEMT as a synchronous rectifier, the proposed D-mode GaN HEMT topology and self-sustainable power supply for gate driver are studied in this work. For analyzing the efficiency of the power conversion and the reliability of the flyback converter, the entire process of current flow to turn on and turn off the secondary diode DS during the continuous current mode, including the diode voltage rise to turn-on time, the snubber reaction time, the battery charging time, the diode voltage falls to turn-off time, and the inductor charging time are introduced in Section 2. The proposed D-mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier consisting of D-mode GaN HEMT topology and self-sustainable power supply for gate driver are presented in Section 3. Then, the proposed depletion mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier verified through the Pspice simulation and experiment are shown in Section 4. The discussion and main conclusions of this work are summarized in Section 5 and Section 6.

2. Flyback Converter

A flyback converter is shown in Figure 1. It shall be noted that the voltage of the primary winding vP is defined according to the conduction of the diode. The feature of battery charging is that the equivalent secondary resistance RS including the resistance of the battery and the on resistance of the secondary diode which is typically less than one Ohm (Ω) is very small. The small resistance provides not much of or even no damping to the current fluctuation. Thus, the two inductor coils with the leakage inductance and the transformer parasitic capacitance [21] can induce high frequency oscillation in both voltage and current during the power conversion.
In Figure 2, under the gate signal of frequency f0, the entire cycle of switching can be divided into two parts. The first part is when the switch Q1 turns on with the duty time δT0, the coil of the primary winding is energized with the magnetic energy in form of current flow. The second part is when the switch turns off with the remaining time (1 − δ)T0 of the switching period, the coil of the magnetic energy in the transformer coils is shuffled into the battery. When the duty δ increases, we will reach a continuous current mode in which the magnetic field is never drained out. During the continuous current mode, the entire process of current flow can be subdivided into five steps in order to turn on and off the secondary diode DS. The resonant flyback with or without an active clamp is mostly popular. The GaN HEMT brings power efficiency advantages when the parasitic capacitive behavior is thoroughly investigated. In order to achieve the soft switching, we can introduce the ZCS (Zero Current Switching) control to optimize the efficiency in the DCM operation, when in the CCM operation the ZVS (Zero Voltage Switching) control can be applied [12,18,19].
These five steps include the diode voltage rise to turn-on time tD,rise, the snubber reaction time tsnubber, the battery charging time tBCH, the diode voltage falls to turn-off time tD,fall, and the inductor charging time tLCH. The current flows on the diode in only three of the five time periods. However, the efficiency of the power conversion and the reliability of the flyback converter relies on all six time steps which are introduced in the following sections.

2.1. Diode Turn-On Period of Time tD,rise

The mathematical model in this section is simplified into a secondary order O.D.E. by ignoring a parasitic inductance in series with the diode DB. With the parasitic inductance concerned, the model may yield two KVL equations to be solved simultaneously. Moreover, the parasitic capacitances are considered as constant which is known as not true for the D-mode GaN has Coss differences around five times when comparing the Coss in low vDS of the turn-on state and high vDS of the turn-off state. However, the reality can bring the system equation into a non-linear differential equation which is very difficult to be analyzed. Hence, we neglect these nonlinear effects with the experimental results as a proof to the applicability of the secondary order O.D.E. The diode on the secondary side of the transformer starts to conduct current when the primary side switch turns off. The secondary side voltage vS takes some rise time tD,rise to increase from the negative induced voltage to the positive voltage higher than the charged voltage in the battery capacitor vBAT. As shown in Figure 1, the derivation of the diode turn-on time may start from the time when the drain-source voltage vDS rises due to the switch Q1 turns off at the primary side, the KVL equation is written as follows.
V D D = v p + v D S = L p d i p d t + v D S
Ignoring the bypass current iB into the snubber, we have the inductor current as follows.
i P = i s w = C O S S d v D S d t
COSS denotes the output parasitic capacitance of the transistor Q1. We then obtain the undamped second order differential equation as follows.
1 ω 1 2 d 2 v D S d t 2 + v D S = V D D
where the resonant frequency is
ω 1 = 1 L p C O S S
Providing that the initial condition of Equation (3) is vDS(0) = 0 and v D S ( 0 ) = i p ( 0 ) / C O S S . The solution of vDS can be obtained as follows.
v D S = i p ( 0 ) ω 1 C O S S sin ω 1 t + V D D ( 1 cos ω 1 t )
Simultaneously the secondary side voltage vs increases from VDD/a when vDS rises from zero voltage. The diode turns on when the voltage vs reaches the battery voltage vBAT + VTH,Ds where VTH,Ds denotes the threshold to turn-on voltage of the diode on the secondary side.
v s = v p a = v D S V D D a = v B A T + V T H , D s
For small ω1 tD,rise, sinω1tω1t, the diode turn-on time can be solved as follows.
t D , r i s e = C O S S i p ( 0 ) ( V D D + a ( v B A T + V T H , D s ) )
Equation (7) states that the diode turn-on time decreases as the input current increases. According to Table 1, if the current of the primary winding is ip(0) = 1 A, then the diode turn-on time is 23 ns.

2.2. Snubber Activated Period of Time tsnubber

When the diode turns on, the secondary winding current starts to flow while the primary winding current falls to zero from its peak value and hence the magnetic energy is shuffled from the primary winding to the secondary winding. However, it will take some delay time until the current on the secondary side reaches the steady state charging current IBCH. The governing equation on the secondary side right after the diode turns on is as follows.
R s d i s d t + i s C B A T = d v s d t = d d t ( L S l d i s d t )
When is started to flow, vp remained ramping up to reach more positive value due to the rise of vDS, which brought vs to be simultaneously ramping up. Since the switch Q1 turns off immediately after the secondary diode is turned on, the snubber circuit as shown in Figure 3 is then activated. During the activation of snubber circuit, Equation (8) yields a governing equation on the secondary side after the diode turns on is as follows.
L S l d 2 i s d t 2 + R s d i s d t + i s C B A T = 0
The initial condition of diS/dt at time tD,rise can be written into the voltage across the leakage inductance of the secondary winding as follows.
d i s d t = 1 L S l ( v p a v B A T V T H , D s )
Since the capacitance CBAT of batteries values at thousands of Faradays, the third term of Equation (9) can be ignored and the current is derived as follows.
i s ( t ) = 1 R s ( v p a v B A T V T H , D s ) ( 1 e t t D , r i s e L S l / R s )
The current will keep increasing until the snubber circuit is deactivated again. The charging process of the snubber capacitor was derived in [22].
d 2 v p d t 2 + 2 ξ 2 ω 2 d v p d t + ω 2 2 v p = a ( v B A T + V T H , D s ) ω 2 2
In the above equation, the natural frequency and the damping ratio are as follows.
ω 2 = 1 a L S l C B
ξ 2 = R B s 2 a C B L S l
To prevent an excessive oscillating response, we prefer an overdamped system, ξ2 >> 1, by increasing CB to yield the first order response of vp with a time constant as follows.
T 2 = 1 2 ξ 2 ω 2 = a 2 L S l R B s
With the time constant, vp falls from a voltage higher than VB and down to the voltage of a(vBAT + VTH,Ds). For the design that RBs > a2RS, the snubber circuit regulates the tempo when converting the magnetic energy from primary winding to the secondary winding. As the snubber capacitor CB stored the voltage VB at time tD,rise + tsnubber in the previous cycle and was discharged through RBp, when DB turns on again, it is recharged to reach the same voltage level VB in steady state. It will typically take one time constant to bring vp down to VB and at that moment the snubber is deactivated. That is,
t s n u b b e r T 2 = a 2 L S l R B s
Table 2 shows the parameters that are used to estimate the snubber activated time. A higher snubber resistance RBs leads to a lower snubber voltage VB and a shorter snubber activation time. However, a higher snubber resistance RBs leads also to the higher ring on the vDS which may damage the transistor Q1.

2.3. Battery Charging Period of Time tBCH

With proper design of the snubber circuit of RBp, the snubber circuit can be assumed off-line after the first peak and reach to the charging time. Due to the current oscillation, the current is in the secondary winding still needs to commute with the primary winding current ip to shuffle the energy in the magnetic field. The charging current is a function of duty δ of switching. In the continuous current mode of battery charging, the duty must be attuned to a large value and the moving average of the charging current must be through a constant current IBCH. As shown in Figure 4, without the interference of the snubber circuit, the commuting current will flow into the output parasitic capacitance of the transistor Q1. The voltage across the transistor can be simplified as follows.
1 ω 2 2 d 2 v D S d t 2 + v D S = V D D + a ( I C H R S + v B A T + V T H , D s )
where the resonant frequency is
ω 2 = 1 L p l C O S S
During the charging period, the current flows into the batteries and thus converts the magnetic energy back into the electrical energy storing in the electrical field. From the energy conservation between the input and output assuming that the power loss is negligible, the output is derived as follows.
V O = δ a ( 1 δ ) V D D
The average battery charging current is then derived in terms of the battery voltage and the duty as follows.
I B C H = 1 R S ( V O ( v B A T + V T H , D s ) ) = 1 R S ( δ a ( 1 δ ) V D D ( v B A T + V T H , D s ) )
Table 3 shows the calculation of the charging current. With the same parameters provided in Table 1 and Table 2, the average charging current can be calculated from the given duty ratio δ. The charging current is indeed oscillating with the frequency of ω1. T0 is switching period time which is the reciprocal of switching frequency f0. The charging time tBCH is a fraction of the switch-off time (1 − δ)T0 of the transistor Q1 as follows.
t B C H = ( 1 δ ) T o t s n u b b e r
The rate of Coulomb charged into the battery at each cycle time during the switch-off time (1 − δ)T0 is estimated as follows.
Battery   charging   rate = 1 R S ( δ V D D a ( 1 δ ) ( v B A T + V T H , D s ) )

2.4. Diode Turn-Off Period with Time tD,fall

The secondary diode turn-off period is a reverse process of the turn-on period providing that the current is turned off before the diode goes into a reverse bias on the secondary side. Right after the switch is turned on, the voltage vDS goes to zero and the transistor conducts the current returned from the secondary side. The KVL equation on the secondary side is written as follows.
L S l d i s d t + i s R S = ( V D D a + v B A T + V T H , D s )
The current response for is > 0 is derived as follows.
i s = 1 R S ( V D D a + v B A T + V T H , D s ) ( 1 e t L S l R S )
With the current rate of is is
d i s d t = 1 L S l ( V D D a + v B A T + V T H , D s )
The time tD, all can be estimated as follow.
t D , f a l l = L S l I C H V D D a + v B A T + V T H , D s
Table 4 shows the calculation result based on Equation (26) and data from Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. The actual result will be ringing in high frequency due to the zero-bias capacitance of the p-n junction Cj0 of the diode. The actual oscillation takes the same form as provided in the next section.

2.5. Inductor Charging Period with Time tLCH

In the beginning of battery charging time, considering the diode is a capacitor Cj0 which is in series with the battery, the voltage ripple is determined by the resonance between smaller capacitor Cj0 and the inductor of the leakage inductance of the secondary winding assuming that the parasitic capacitance of the secondary winding is typically smaller than Cj0. The governing equation is written as follow.
L S l d 2 i s d t 2 + R S d i s d t + i s C j 0 = 0
Assuming the initial condition of dis/dt at time the starting time of tLCH still remains the same as Equation (25) after a short time decay tD, all. The current response is then written in a form of impulse response of the second order system as follows.
i s = A 1 e ξ 3 ω 3 t cos ( 1 ξ 3 2 ω 3 t )
ω 3 = 1 L S l C j 0
ξ 3 = R S 2 C j 0 L S l
A 1 = V D D a + v B A T + V T H , D s I B C H R S
The constant A1 is derived from the continuity of the voltage vs as a transition from the diode turn-off period. The current ripple is as well as the voltage ripple vs are both in high frequency ω3 as shown in Table 5. The damping ratio of the current response is also a function of Cj0. Higher the capacitance Cj0, higher the damping. On the other hand, when Cj0 reaches a large value, the reverse saturation current could become a significant input function on the right-hand side of Equation (27) and induce a steady state voltage ripple as an EMF problem on the secondary side. During the inductor charging time with the DC power supply of voltage VDD, the primary winding raises the amount of current flowing in the inductor as follows.
t L C H = L p Δ i p V D D

3. D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier

The typical rectifier diode holds a certain threshold voltage VTH,Ds during the forward bias period as battery charging period may cause a power loss. Nevertheless, the zero bias junction capacitance Cj0 can induce a high frequency oscillation during the inductor charging period. The reverse recovery current from the PN junction can also impose the high frequency oscillation that becomes a burden to the EMI filter of the primary side of the flyback converter. There is thus a reason to design a synchronous rectifier to relief the common problems occurred while using the rectifier diode. The D-mode GaN HEMT is made in NYCU with the characteristics stated in [22,23], which is summarized in Table 6.
Several challenges that are needed to overcome for using the D-mode GaN HEMT includes:
  • It is a normally-on device which is not applicable to block the current flowing to battery during the inductor charging period;
  • The power supply system to the GaN HEMT must be self-sustainable on the secondary side when the battery is on low voltage or even empty;
  • It shall turn off itself during the reverse bias.

3.1. Cascode GaN HEMT Power Module

Using a conventional cascade configuration, in which the Si MOSFET is used to perform the switching, may not be in favor of losses. The temperature capability of the D-GaN may not be used because the Si MOSFET does not enable to reach a higher operating temperature when the switching loss falls on the Si MOSFET. Instead of the conventional cascade configuration, this paper uses a GaN-switching cascode power module proposed in [12,18] which fulfills the conversion from the normally on device into the normally off device and delegate the switching responsibility to the D-mode GaN. The Si MOSFET is then prevented from a high operating temperature. Conventionally, a cascode configuration combining Si MOSFET and D-mode GaN HEMT is used to simplify the driving requirements. The cascode configuration makes the D-mode GaN HEMT switching operation from normally-on to normally-off, and makes it compatible with conventional gate driver, where normally-off devices are preferred because of safety consideration. Usually, low-voltage LDMOS were used in the cascode configuration [24]. The GaN-switching cascode GaN HEMT power module, consisting of three terminals, is shown in Figure 5. There is a diode connecting the module gate (G) with the NMOS gate, whereas the source of the module will be connected to the battery. A clamp circuit is inserted before the module drain (S) and the gate of the GaN HEMT. When the clamp circuit’s capacitor Cp is not charged in the initial state, both the NMOS and D-mode GaN HEMT are turned off. Hence, it is a normally-off power module initially. Thus, the power module fulfills the first condition to be a normally-off module and capable of blocking the current flow to battery during the inductor charging period.

3.2. Self-Sustainable Power Supply for Gate Driver

The flyback converter will initially go through the periods from (a) the inductor charging period and proceeds to (b) the snubber reaction period, (c) the diode turn-on period, (d) the battery charging period, and finally continues to (e) the diode turn-off period. During the inductor charging period, there is a window of time in which we can utilize the blocking voltage in reverse bias by the power module to charge the capacitor. As shown in Figure 6, a peak detector circuit is used to store the electrical charges into the storage capacitor. To prevent the surge occurred in the initialization stage of capacitor CPD, the peak detector circuit may also connect a resistor RPD in series with the diode DPD and CPD. During the forward bias time, the capacitor CPD will supply charges to the gate drive for switching the power module. The gate drive is a non-inverting, single 7.6 A peak current low-side gate driver LM5114B from Texas Instruments, which can be used with +4 V to +12.6 V single power supply. The source (S) of power module is connected to the high side of vs. The drain (D) of the power module is connected to the battery. The power module is controlled at the gate (G). The circuit in Figure 6 is more complex than a simple rectifier diode, the fabrication of which needs quite some effort and knowledge to form a SIP (System in a Package) package. However, the D-mode GaN Synchronous rectifier does not need to hold a threshold voltage as a rectifier diode does when it turns on. The D-mode GaN Synchronous rectifier is more power efficient in medium output voltage applications such as 12 V battery charging, which trades off the efficiency and EMI reduction with the extra cost on fabrication.
As shown in Figure 7, during the period from the initial time t0 to t1 the first inductor charging period starts that the voltage on the secondary side of the transformer vs < 0 the capacitor CPD and is charged in a polarity as shown in Figure 6. The capacitor CP is discharged, thus the NMOS turns off while the D-mode GaN turns on as a normally on device. The NMOS is oriented in the direction as shown in Figure 6. The body diode of NMOS can block the reverse current when NMOS turns off, surpassing the first challenge as stated in Section 3 that the power module is off when the primary side inductor of the flyback converter is initially charging the magnetic energy. In the same initial inductor charging period, the control terminal vc of the gate driver IC powered by the capacitor CPD is self-sustainable on the secondary side when the battery is on low voltage which overcomes the second challenge as stated before. The control terminal vc is high relative to its voltage source ground at vA+, thus RG,n will connect the positive end of the capacitor CP to vA+. Owing to vs < 0, the diode DP is zero biased, which will not conduct any current if there was no charge existing in CP initially. Parameters in D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier are shown in Table 7.
As shown in Figure 7, during the period from the initial time t1 to t2, the secondary side voltage vs > 0 and the control terminal vc of the gate driver IC is high relative to its voltage source ground at vA+. The capacitor Cp will be gradually charged through the gate resistance RG,p to the same voltage level as VPD in CPD. When the voltage of Cp denoted as vCP reaches a high voltage, the NMOS turns on. At the same time, the gate of the D-mode GaN HEMT senses zero voltage relative to vA+, that is vgs,GaN = VPDvCP = 0. The D-mode GaN HEMT remains off. In practice, we need an external resistor RPD to slow down the process of CPD charging to prevent the ripple during the capacitor redistribution between CP and CPD.
As shown in Figure 7, during the period from the initial time t2 to t3 the voltage becomes negative again, i.e., vs < 0. RG,n will connect the positive end of the capacitor Cp to vA+, at this time vgs,GaN = − vCP < vgs,GaN_ON. The D-mode GaN HEMT turns off due to the large negative voltage presented across the gate-source. This overcomes the third challenge that the power module shall turn off itself during the reverse bias.

3.3. D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier

As shown in Figure 7, during the period from the initial time t3 to t4, the voltage vs > 0 becomes positive again. After the first time, vs > 0 the parasitic capacitance of the NMOS of the power module is storing the voltage Vs,high which can no more be released due to the presence of the diode DM. The NMOS of the power module will remain turn-on after the first cycle of switching, therefore the actual rectification is performed by D-mode GaN HEMT synchronously according to the vs. Compared to a normal rectifier diode such as RFN10T2D, the D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier poses the features as follows:
  • The threshold voltage for the diode VTH,Ds vanishes in the synchronous rectifier, which can yield the synchronous rectifier with an advantage on the large current applications;
  • The reverse recovery current of the D-mode GaN HEMT is insignificant due to the GaN HEMT, which does not have a body diode. The NMOS remains turn-on without further switching, hence the body diode effect on the NMOS is also insignificant;
  • The zero-voltage capacitance of the conventional diode is low, which causes much oscillation noise which becomes a burden to the EMI filter. The GaN HEMT will present a smoother switching response in the voltages compared to the rectifier diode. The switching ringing during the diode turn-off as well as the inductor charging period are most benefited by the D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier.

4. Simulation and Experimental Results

4.1. SPICE Simulation of the D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier

The flyback converter with a D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier is simulated using the OrCAD Pspice simulator, and the circuit topology is shown in Figure 8. The identical parameters are used in the simulation for the above analysis. Nevertheless, the battery equivalent circuit with extra parasitic inductances are used to mimic their non-ideality due to the parasitic inductances resulting from the lead of the switch and the connecting wire. For making simulation more realistic, the transformer equivalent circuit and parameter used in simulation are shown in Figure 9 and Table 8, respectively. For reducing the simulation time to reach the steady state, a voltage source is used to connect in series with the output capacitance. The waveforms represent the gate voltage (vGS), primary switch current (ip), output current (is) and transformer secondary voltage (vs) as shown in the schematic. The five-state-rectification waveforms with both the rectifier diode synchronous rectifier switch were shown in Figure 10a,b, respectively. In the simulation, both circuits with rectifier diode and synchronous rectifier yielded the transformer secondary voltage (vs) with similar oscillating frequency around 60 MHz, which is the same as derived in Table 5, when the rectifiers turn off. The amplitude of the oscillation is smaller when the synchronous rectifier is introduced. The secondary synchronous rectifier takes shorter time to turn on within (1 − δ)T interval, and the current provided by the magnetic energy flow into battery after snubber capacitance was fully charged. According to (7), the rectifier takes about 23 ns which fits the simulation. Additionally, the snubber charging time and the battery charging time derived in (16) and (21) were compared in Table 9. When primary switch turns on again, the secondary current is decreased to zero in tD,fall. The secondary voltage rings will lead to some power lose due to zero-voltage capacitance. However, the rectifier using GaN power module has lower conduction loss and parasitic capacitance. Thus, it is worthy to replace diode with a GaN based transistor. Then, the result of the flyback converter is used to compare the analysis of the theoretical and experiment data with the same circuit parameters.

4.2. Experimental Result

To verify the above theoretical analysis, a laboratory prototype was implemented, and the experimental setup as shown in Figure 11 was built on a PCB, including lithium-ion battery pack, and flyback converter circuit with synchronous rectifier. The input DC voltage of the converter is 72 V, and its output voltage is 7.6 V. Moreover, the switching frequency and duty cycle of the converter are 280 kHz and 62%, respectively. The values of parameters are selected based on the design considerations and are shown in Table 10. The waveforms are shown in Figure 12, the oscilloscope is used to test the VS, VG, and is. The gate voltages VG on the primary side switch, which is a Transphorm GaN, carried some high frequency noise could be induced by parasitic coupling of the power supply; however, it can merely affect the five-state-rectification on the secondary side. The results are found closely comparable and confirm the aforementioned theoretical analysis and waveforms of the proposed converter. According to the derivation of the response described in the previous section, it is clear in Table 11 that the comparison of derivation in each of five steps. In Table 11, we can see the same time of the tD,rise and tsnubber, but the component measure might not be precise, thus the value coming from the equation derived has some difference.
Compared with the simulation results shown in Figure 10, the transformer secondary voltages from the experiments can drop to below zero but not from the simulation. It was owing to the negative voltage from leakage inductance due to decreasing current cannot be separately measured from the transformer in practice. This is caused by the position of the differential probe that cannot be put in front of the leakage inductance while conducting the experiment. In Figure 12b, the D-mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier works similar to a diode rectifier in Figure 12a in discontinuous conduction mode, the structure is very simple and its voltage sequence is shown in Figure 13.
Figure 14 shows waveform captured at 5.05 A when it is in the heavy loading condition. Due to its capacitive load, the capacitive reactance resisting the voltage change caused the circuit current to yield a phase leading that of the voltage by 90 electrical degrees. For the diode rectifier as shown in Figure 14a, the oscillation of Vo occurred during the time period tBCH because the primary inductance and parasitic capacitance of the transistor had a high frequency resonant as stated in Section 2. In addition, the ringing problems occurred during the time periods tD,fall and tLCH may impose the EMI filter with extra burden. The ringing problem is due to its small capacitor Cj0 of the diode and the inductor of the leakage inductance on the secondary winding. As shown in Figure 14b, the GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier presented smoother switching responses in both the voltages and the currents. The high frequency switching ringing can be greatly reduced when the D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier is adopted. As shown in Figure 14c, the frequency spectrums of transformer secondary voltage show that the rectifier diode circuit can induce higher amplitudes at 30 MHz and 60 MHz. The EMI signature differences verified the reduction in oscillations using the synchronous rectifier.

5. Discussion

Literature [25] addresses with the extreme efficiency in power electronics when efficiency approaches 100%. The measurement data have been acquired in the two-chamber calorimeter which handles the temperature control. In this study, we used the air conditioner to maintain the room temperature. The experiments were performed intermittently to reduce the temperature effect upon the experiments. The measurement of current and voltage responses in Section 4 can be used in the efficiency calculation as follows. When the rectifiers are used in the secondary side of the flyback converter. The input power can be calculated as the average of the multiplication of the secondary voltage vs and the current is. The output power can be calculated as the average of the multiplication of the battery voltage vBAT and same current is. By ignoring the internal resistance loss of the battery, the rectification efficiency η may be calculated from the division of the output power to battery and the input power from the secondary winding.
η = k = 1 10000 v B A T ( k ) i s ( k ) k = 1 10000 v s ( k ) i s ( k )
When the converter runs at discontinuous current mode (DCM) [12] with the load current lower than 1.5 A, there is no sufficient current to drive the D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier properly. The gate driver of D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier is not charged to a specific voltage the gate driver needs, i.e., 12 V in this study. Therefore, the efficiency of the GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier can be lower than the diode rectifier as shown in Figure 15. The particular diode we have chosen to compare with is a super-fast recovery diode RFN10T2D. However, in the continuous current mode (CCM) applications, the D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier is better than RFN10T2D by 2% of the efficiency. However, at very light load situation (current > 5.5 A), the efficiency of D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier will fall to below 95%. The efficiency drop is due to the on-resistance loss of the D-mode GaN HEMT. The corresponding result for the parallel battery charging application using the D-mode GaN synchronous rectifiers will be reported in [26].

6. Conclusions

The response of continuous current mode of the flyback converter is essentially determined by the rectifier diode characteristics. Namely, the diode turn-on period, the battery charging period, and the diode turn-off period of the continuous current mode are all determined by the diode characteristics. Selection of the rectifier diode is crucial to the power conversion efficiency. This research proposed a synchronous rectifier using the D-mode GaN HEMT and fabricated and tested the corresponding circuit. The result shows that the comparison case, diode RFN10T2D, is advantageous in the discontinuous current mode due to the diode threshold voltage (0.5 V in this study) did not cause much power loss in low current operation. Whereas the D-Mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier overwhelmed in the continuous current mode application, which presented a 2% leading in the rectification efficiency compared with the RFN10T2D. In addition to the efficiency advantage, the GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier presented smoother switching responses in both the voltages and the currents, which is preferable in the EMI filter loading consideration. In the operation of higher current with 5 A and more, the 120 mm gate length D-Mode GaN HEMT having nearly 200 mΩ on-resistance can induce nearly 1 V voltage drop under 5 A current charging. Thus, in order to achieve a higher efficiency, the 240 mm GaN HEMT may be used. However, a 240 mm GaN HEMT may add more parasitic capacitances to the switching, which is unfavorable in the high frequency switching. The parallel connection of two 120 mm GaN HEMT power modules with independent gate drives is needed to study in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.-Y.C. and W.-H.C.; methodology, Y.-T.S. and C.-C.W.; software, C.-C.W.; validation, C.-Y.L. and Y.-T.S.; formal analysis, Y.-T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.-H.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-T.S., C.-Y.L. and C.-C.W.; visualization, C.-Y.L. and C.-C.W.; supervision, E.-Y.C.; project administration, W.-H.C.; funding acquisition, W.-H.C. and E.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C., grant number MOST(NSC) 110-2622-8-009-018-SB; MOST(NSC) 110-2622-8-007-019. In part, this work was also financially supported by the “Center for the Semiconductor Technology Research” from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan. Additionally supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under Grant MOST 110-2634-F-009-027.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C. The authors also thank You-Chen Weng of the CSD Lab for fabricating the D-Mode MIS-HEMT chips and IMLab graduate students for their help in the experimental setup.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramos-Paja, C.A.; Bastidas-Rodriguez, J.D.; Saavedra-Montes, A.J. Design and Control of a Battery Charger/Discharger Based on the Flyback Topology. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guo, X.; Geng, J.; Liu, Z.; Xu, X.; Cao, W. A Flyback Converter-Based Hybrid Balancing Method for Series-Connected Battery Pack in Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 6626–6635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Imtiaz, A.M.; Khan, F.H. “Time Shared Flyback Converter” Based Regenerative Cell Balancing Technique for Series Connected Li-Ion Battery Strings. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 5960–5975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, Y.-D.; Hu, K.-Y.; Tsai, C.-H. Digital Battery Management Design for Point-of-Load Applications with Cell Balancing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 67, 6365–6375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeng, S.L.; Peng, M.T.; Hsu, C.Y.; Chieng, W.H.; Shu, J.P. Quasi-Resonant Flyback DC/DC Converter Using GaN Power Transistors. World Electr. Veh. J. 2012, 5, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mauromicale, G.; Raciti, A.; Rizzo, S.A.; Susinni, G.; Fusillo, F.; Palermo, A.; Scrimizzi, F. Efficiency of state-of-the-art GaN devices in a synchronous-rectifier buck converter. In Proceedings of the IECON 2019—45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Lisbon, Portugal, 14–17 October 2019; pp. 1726–1731. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ho, G.K.Y.; Fang, Y.; Pong, B.M.H.; Hui, R.S.Y. Printed circuit board planar current transformer for GaN active diode. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Tampa, FL, USA, 26–30 March 2017; pp. 2549–2553. [Google Scholar]
  8. Paolucci, M.; Green, P.B. Benefits of GaN e-Mode HEMTs in Wireless Power Transfer—GaN Power Devices in Resonant Class D and Class E Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers. October 2018. Rev 1.0. Infineon, White Paper. Available online: https://www.infineon.com/wirelesscharging (accessed on 17 October 2018).
  9. Zhang, Y.; Yang, F. Maximizing the Performance of GaN with Ideal Diode Mode; Texas Instruments Application Report; Texas Instruments: Dallas, TX, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Peftitsis, D.; Rabkowski, J.; Nee, H.-P. Self-Powered Gate Driver for Normally ON Silicon Carbide Junction Field-Effect Transistors Without External Power Supply. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2012, 28, 1488–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ishibashi, T.; Okamoto, M.; Hiraki, E.; Tanaka, T.; Hashizume, T.; Kikuta, D.; Kachi, T. Experimental validation of normally-on GaN HEMT and its gate drive circuit. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2014, 51, 2415–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, C.-C.; Liu, C.-Y.; Anand, S.; Chieng, W.-H.; Chang, E.-Y.; Sarkar, A. Comparisons on Different Innovative Cascode GaN HEMT E-Mode Power Modules and Their Efficiencies on the Flyback Converter. Energies 2021, 14, 5966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, B. Does GaN Have a Body Diode? Understanding the Third Quadrant Operation of GaN; Application Report-SNOAA36; Texas Instruments: Dallas, TX, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Asad, M.; Singha, A.K.; Rao, R.M.S. Dead Time Optimization in a GaN-Based Buck Converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 37, 2830–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chiu, P.K.; Wang, P.Y.; Li, S.T.; Chen, C.J.; Chen, Y.T. A GaN driver IC with novel highly digitally adaptive dead-time control for synchronous rectifier buck converter. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Detroit, MI, USA, 11–15 October 2020; pp. 3788–3792. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xue, L.; Zhang, J. Highly Efficient Secondary-Resonant Active Clamp Flyback Converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017, 65, 1235–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tang, L.C.; Jeng, S.L.; Chang, E.Y.; Chieng, W.H. Variable-Frequency Pulse Width Modulation Circuits for Resonant Wireless Power Transfer. Energies 2021, 14, 3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, C.-C.; Liu, C.-Y.; Wang, G.-B.; Shieh, Y.-T.; Chieng, W.-H.; Chang, E.Y. A New GaN-Based Device, P-Cascode GaN HEMT, and Its Synchronous Buck Converter Circuit Realization. Energies 2021, 14, 3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, R.; Wu, C.-C.; Liu, C.-Y.; Hsiao, Y.-L.; Chieng, W.-H.; Chang, E.-Y. Discontinuous Current Mode Modeling and Zero Current Switching of Flyback Converter. Energies 2021, 14, 5996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhan, H.; Wu, H.; Muhammad, M.; Lambert, S.; Pickert, V. Combining electric vehicle battery charging and battery cell equalisation in one circuit. IET Electr. Syst. Transp. 2021, 11, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meng, X.Z.; Li, C.Y.; Meng, T.; An, Y.H. Analysis and Design of Transformer Windings Schemes in Multiple-Output Flyback Auxiliary Power Supplies with High-Input Voltage. J. Power Electron. 2019, 19, 1122–1132. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, C.-Y.; Wang, G.-B.; Wu, C.-C.; Chang, E.Y.; Cheng, S.; Chieng, W.-H. Derivation of the Resonance Mechanism for Wireless Power Transfer Using Class-E Amplifier. Energies 2021, 14, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Weng, Y.-C.; Wu, C.-C.; Chang, E.Y.; Chieng, W.-H. Minimum Power Input Control for Class-E Amplifier Using Depletion-Mode Gallium Nitride High Electron Mobility Transistor. Energies 2021, 14, 2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, C.C.; Jeng, S.L. Comparison of Parasitic Capacitances of Packaged Cascode Gallium Nitride Field-effect Transistors. Sens. Mater. 2018, 30, 453–461. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kolar, J.W.; Krismer, F.; Lobsiger, Y.; Mühlethaler, J.; Nussbaumer, T.; Miniböck, J. Extreme Efficiency Power Electronics. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Integrated Power Electronics Systems (CIPS 2012), Nuremberg, Germany, 6–8 March 2012; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shieh, Y.-T.; Wu, C.-C.; Liu, C.-Y.; Chieng, W.-H.; Su, Y.-S.; Jeng, S.-L. Modelling of Parallel Lithium Battery Charging. Energies 2022. submitted. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Flyback converter circuit.
Figure 1. Flyback converter circuit.
Energies 15 03197 g001
Figure 2. The assumed responses.
Figure 2. The assumed responses.
Energies 15 03197 g002
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit for the current flowing to the snubber and the battery when the secondary diode is on.
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit for the current flowing to the snubber and the battery when the secondary diode is on.
Energies 15 03197 g003
Figure 4. AC Equivalent circuit for the current flowing to the snubber and the battery when the secondary diode is on.
Figure 4. AC Equivalent circuit for the current flowing to the snubber and the battery when the secondary diode is on.
Energies 15 03197 g004
Figure 5. The GaN-switching cascode GaN HEMT power module.
Figure 5. The GaN-switching cascode GaN HEMT power module.
Energies 15 03197 g005
Figure 6. The D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier.
Figure 6. The D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier.
Energies 15 03197 g006
Figure 7. Voltage sequence of the synchronous rectifier.
Figure 7. Voltage sequence of the synchronous rectifier.
Energies 15 03197 g007
Figure 8. SPICE Simulation.
Figure 8. SPICE Simulation.
Energies 15 03197 g008
Figure 9. Flyback Transformer equivalent circuit used in SPICE Simulation.
Figure 9. Flyback Transformer equivalent circuit used in SPICE Simulation.
Energies 15 03197 g009
Figure 10. Simulation results with (a) rectifier diode and (b) GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier.
Figure 10. Simulation results with (a) rectifier diode and (b) GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier.
Energies 15 03197 g010aEnergies 15 03197 g010b
Figure 11. The photograph of flyback experiment setup with D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier.
Figure 11. The photograph of flyback experiment setup with D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier.
Energies 15 03197 g011
Figure 12. The response of oscilloscope screen dump. (a) diode (RFN10T2D), (b) D-mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier.
Figure 12. The response of oscilloscope screen dump. (a) diode (RFN10T2D), (b) D-mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier.
Energies 15 03197 g012aEnergies 15 03197 g012b
Figure 13. Voltage responses of the D-mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier.
Figure 13. Voltage responses of the D-mode GaN HEMT synchronous rectifier.
Energies 15 03197 g013
Figure 14. Waveform of 72 V input, 12 V/5.05 A flyback converter with (a) diode (RFN10T2D) and (b) D-mode GaN HEMT SR. (c) Comparison of the transformer secondary voltage (vs) frequency spectrums.
Figure 14. Waveform of 72 V input, 12 V/5.05 A flyback converter with (a) diode (RFN10T2D) and (b) D-mode GaN HEMT SR. (c) Comparison of the transformer secondary voltage (vs) frequency spectrums.
Energies 15 03197 g014aEnergies 15 03197 g014b
Figure 15. Rectification efficiency comparison.
Figure 15. Rectification efficiency comparison.
Energies 15 03197 g015
Table 1. Parameters used to estimate the diode turn-on time.
Table 1. Parameters used to estimate the diode turn-on time.
SymbolUnitOriginalValue
COSSpFMeasurement200 @ VDS = 72 V
VDDVMeasurement72 V
vBATVMeasurement7
a Measurement6
VTH,DsVRFN10T2D0.5 V
ω1MradEquation (5)3.5
tD,riseip(0)nCEquation (7)23
Table 2. Parameters used to estimate the snubber activated time.
Table 2. Parameters used to estimate the snubber activated time.
SymbolUnitOriginalValue
CBμFMeasurement1
a Measurement6
RBsΩMeasurement33
RSΩMeasurement0.55
LSlnHMeasurement270
tsnubber, T2nsEquation (16)300
Table 3. Calculation of the charging current provided with parameters in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 3. Calculation of the charging current provided with parameters in Table 1 and Table 2.
SymbolUnitOriginalValue
LPluHRLC meter9.97
f2 = ω2/2πMHzEquation (18)3.6
δ Input45%
IBCHAEquation (20)6
Table 4. Calculation of the charging current with parameters provided in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 4. Calculation of the charging current with parameters provided in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
SymbolUnitOriginalValue
tD, allnsEquation (26)100
Table 5. Calculation of the Inductor charging with parameters provided in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 5. Calculation of the Inductor charging with parameters provided in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
SymbolUnitOriginalValue
Cj0pFData sheet15
f3 = ω3/2πMHzEquation (29)60
ξ3Damping ratioEquation (30)0.002
Table 6. Characteristics summary of the D-mode GaN HEMT under 1 MHz switching.
Table 6. Characteristics summary of the D-mode GaN HEMT under 1 MHz switching.
SymbolUnitDescriptionValuevDS
0 V800 V
Vgs,GaN_ONVTurn-on voltage−7
CDSpFParasitic capacitance 4030
CGDpFParasitic capacitance 22020
CGSpFParasitic capacitance 100115
Table 7. Parameters in D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier.
Table 7. Parameters in D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier.
SymbolUnitOriginalValue
CPnFPeak detector capacitor1
DP Power module diode 1BAV170
DM Power module diode 21N4007
CPDnFPeak detector capacitor100
RPDΩPeak detector resistor33
DPD Peak detector diode1N4007
IC Gate driveLM5114B
RG,nΩGate drive27
RG,pΩGate drive30
Table 8. Transformer parameters in SPICE Simulation.
Table 8. Transformer parameters in SPICE Simulation.
SymbolUnitDescriptionValue
RpPrimary winding resistance1
CppFPrimary parasitic capacitance10
Lp1nHPrimary parasitic inductance300
LpμHPrimary winding inductance400
LsμHSecondary winding inductance10.27
CspFSecondary parasitic capacitance10
Ls1nHSecondary parasitic inductance235
k-Coupling coefficient0.987
Table 9. Comparison between analysis and simulation result.
Table 9. Comparison between analysis and simulation result.
TimeEquation NumberAnalysisSimulation
tD,rise (ns)(7)2834
tsnubber (ns)(16)166137
tBCH (ns)(21)17701786
tD,fall (ns)(26)10089
tLCH (ns)(32)13901510
Table 10. Parameter of the proposed converter.
Table 10. Parameter of the proposed converter.
ParameterTypeValue
Power switch -
Snubber diode (DB)1N4007-
Magnetizing inductor (Lp, Ls)-400 μH, 10.27 μH
Leakage inductor (LPl, LSl)-9.97 μH, 0.27 μH
Snubber capacitor (CB)Ceramic capacitor3300 pF
Snubber resistance (RBs)Carbon film resistor45 Ω
Turn ratio-6
Table 11. The time comparison in two different kinds of rectifier.
Table 11. The time comparison in two different kinds of rectifier.
TimeEquation DerivedDiode (RFN10T2D)Synchronous Rectifier (D-Mode GaN HEMT)
tD,rise (ns)113030
tsnubber (ns)216350350
tBCH (ns)114010581041
tD,fall (ns)133440420
tLCH (ns)166716931730
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shieh, Y.-T.; Liu, C.-Y.; Wu, C.-C.; Chieng, W.-H.; Chang, E.-Y. Flyback Converter Using a D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier. Energies 2022, 15, 3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093197

AMA Style

Shieh Y-T, Liu C-Y, Wu C-C, Chieng W-H, Chang E-Y. Flyback Converter Using a D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier. Energies. 2022; 15(9):3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shieh, Yueh-Tsung, Ching-Yao Liu, Chih-Chiang Wu, Wei-Hua Chieng, and Edward-Yi Chang. 2022. "Flyback Converter Using a D-Mode GaN HEMT Synchronous Rectifier" Energies 15, no. 9: 3197. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093197

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop