# Numerical Study of Baroclinic Acoustic Streaming Phenomenon for Various Flow Parameters

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Problem Geometries

#### 2.1. Rectangular Channel Geometry

#### 2.2. Pt-100 Thermometer Geometry

## 3. Mathematical Model and Numerical Implementation

#### 3.1. Numerical Calculations

#### 3.2. Implementation of the Wall Osculations

#### 3.3. Definition of Metrics of Total, Fluctuating and Streaming Velocities

**u**over 10 cycles of the acoustic wave:

#### 3.4. Nusselt Number Calculation

## 4. Results and Discussion

#### 4.1. Impact of the Third Dimension on the Streaming

#### 4.2. Impact of Streaming Flow on Heat Transport

#### 4.3. Application of Streaming Phenomenon in Pt-100 Resistance Thermometer

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Riley, N. Steady streaming. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
**2001**, 33, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Riley, N.; Trinh, E.H. Steady streaming in an oscillatory inviscid flow. Phys. Fluids
**2001**, 13, 1956–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Strutt, J.W. On the circulation of air observed in Kundt’s tubes, and on some allied acoustical problems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.
**1883**, 36, 10–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lin, Y.; Farouk, B. Heat transfer in a rectangular chamber with differentially heated horizontal walls: Effects of a vibrating sidewall. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2008**, 51, 3179–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chini, G.; Malecha, Z.; Dreeben, T. Large-amplitude acoustic streaming. J. Fluid Mech.
**2014**, 744, 329–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dreeben, T.D.; Chini, G.P. Two-dimensional streaming flows in high-intensity discharge lamps. Phys. Fluids
**2011**, 23, 056101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Michel, G.; Chini, G.P. Strong wave–mean-flow coupling in baroclinic acoustic streaming. J. Fluid Mech.
**2019**, 858, 536–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Piercy, J.E.; Lamb, J.; Rosenhead, L. Acoustic streaming in liquids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci.
**1954**, 226, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grotberg, J.B. Volume-cycled oscillatory flow in a tapered channel. J. Fluid Mech.
**1984**, 141, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gaver, D.P.; Grotberg, J.B. An experimental investigation of oscillating flow in a tapered channel. J. Fluid Mech.
**1986**, 172, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lighthill, S.J. Biomechanics of Hearing Sensitivity. J. Vib. Acoust.
**1991**, 113, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lighthill, J. Acoustic streaming in the ear itself. J. Fluid Mech.
**1992**, 239, 551–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Amin, N.; Clarke, J.F. The effect of g-jitter on heat transfer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci.
**1988**, 419, 151–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yaralioglu, G.G.; Wygant, I.O.; Marentis, T.C.; Khuri-Yakub, B.T. Ultrasonic Mixing in Microfluidic Channels Using Integrated Transducers. Anal. Chem.
**2004**, 76, 3694–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bengston, M.; Laurell, T. Ultrasonic agitation in microchannels. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.
**2004**, 378, 1716–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lu, H.F.; Tien, W.H. Comparison of Acoustic Streaming Flow Patterns Induced by Solid, Liquid and Gas Obstructions. Micromachines
**2020**, 11, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ahmed, D.; Mao, X.; Juluri, B.K.; Huang, T.J. A fast microfluidic mixer based on acoustically driven sidewall-trapped microbubbles. Microfluid. Nanofluid.
**2009**, 7, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, C.; Jalikop, S.V.; Hilgenfeldt, S. Efficient manipulation of microparticles in bubble streaming flows. Biomicrofluidics
**2012**, 6, 012801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Huang, P.H.; Xie, Y.; Ahmed, D.; Rufo, J.; Nama, N.; Chen, Y.; Chan, C.Y.; Huang, T.J. An acoustofluidic micromixer based on oscillating sidewall sharp-edges. Lab Chip
**2013**, 13, 3847–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lyubimova, T.P.; Perminov, A.V.; Kazimardanov, M.G. Stability of quasi-equilibrium states and supercritical regimes of thermal vibrational convection of a Williamson fluid in zero gravity conditions. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2019**, 129, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hyun, S.; Lee, D.R.; Loh, B.G. Investigation of convective heat transfer augmentation using acoustic streaming generated by ultrasonic vibrations. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2005**, 48, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aktas, M.K.; Ozgumus, T. The effects of acoustic streaming on thermal convection in an enclosure with differentially heated horizontal walls. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2010**, 53, 5289–5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wada, Y.; Koyama, D.; Nakamura, K. Acoustic streaming in an ultrasonic air pump with three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain analysis and comparison to the measurement. Ultrasonics
**2014**, 54, 2119–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Parvizian, F.; Rahimi, M.; Azimi, N.; Alsairafi, A.A. CFD Modeling of Micromixing and Velocity Distribution in a 1.7-MHz Tubular Sonoreactor. Chem. Eng. Technol.
**2014**, 37, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Karlsen, J.T.; Qiu, W.; Augustsson, P.; Bruus, H. Acoustic Streaming and Its Suppression in Inhomogeneous Fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2018**, 120, 054501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - El Ghani, N.; Miralles, S.; Botton, V.; Henry, D.; Ben Hadid, H.; Ter-Ovanessian, B.; Marcelin, S. Acoustic streaming enhanced mass transfer at a wall. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2021**, 172, 121090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jiang, G.S.; Yang, Y.F.; Liu, Y.C.; Jiang, Y. Acoustic streaming outside spherical particles and parameter analysis of heat transfer enhancement. Eur. J. Mech.-B/Fluids
**2021**, 86, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, X.; Bayanheshig; Jiao, Q.; Tan, X.; Wang, W. Numerical simulation of ultrasonic enhancement by acoustic streaming and thermal effect on mass transfer through a new computation model. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2021**, 171, 121074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hamilton, M.F.; Ilinskii, Y.A.; Zabolotskaya, E.A. Acoustic streaming generated by standing waves in two-dimensional channels of arbitrary width. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**2003**, 113, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hamilton, M.; Ilinskii, Y.; Zabolotskaya, E. Thermal effects on acoustic streaming in standing waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
**2003**, 114, 3092–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Daru, V.; Baltean-Carlès, D.; Weisman, C.; Debesse, P.; Gandikota, G. Two-dimensional numerical simulations of nonlinear acoustic streaming in standing waves. Wave Motion
**2013**, 50, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Červenka, M.; Bednařík, M. Variety of acoustic streaming in 2D resonant channels. Wave Motion
**2016**, 66, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Valitov, G.; Jamshidi, R.; Rossi, D.; Gavriilidis, A.; Mazzei, L. Effect of acoustic streaming on continuous flow sonocrystallization in millifluidic channels. Chem. Eng. J.
**2020**, 379, 122221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rahimi, M.; Dehbani, M.; Abolhasani, M. Experimental study on the effects of acoustic streaming of high frequency ultrasonic waves on convective heat transfer: Effects of transducer position and wave interference. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.
**2012**, 39, 720–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jiang, G.S.; Yang, Y.F.; Xu, W.L.; Yu, M.; Liu, Y.C. Convective heat exchange characteristics of acoustic-induced flows over a sphere: The role of acoustic streaming. Appl. Acoust.
**2021**, 177, 107915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Michel, G.; Gissinger, C. Cooling by Baroclinic Acoustic Streaming. Phys. Rev. Appl.
**2021**, 16, L051003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lei, J.; Cheng, F.; Li, K. Numerical Simulation of Boundary-Driven Acoustic Streaming in Microfluidic Channels with Circular Cross-Sections. Micromachines
**2020**, 11, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - OpenFOAM Free Software Foundation. The Open Source CFD Toolbox User Guide; OpenFoam Foundation Ltd.: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J. Acoustic Streaming and Its Applications. Fluids
**2018**, 3, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Issa, R.; Gosman, A.; Watkins, A. The computation of compressible and incompressible recirculating flows by a non-iterative implicit scheme. J. Comput. Phys.
**1986**, 62, 66–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ferziger, J.H.; Peric, M.; Street, R.L. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chase, M.W.; Curnutt, J.L.; Downey, J.R.; McDonald, R.A.; Syverud, A.N.; Valenzuela, E.A. JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 1982 Supplement. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
**1982**, 11, 695–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Gill, A.E.; Adrian, E. Atmosphere—Ocean Dynamics; International Geophysics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982; Volume 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Investigated geometries. (

**a**) Rectangular channel geometry. 1—moving left wall, 2—bottom wall, 3—top wall, 4—right wall, L—channel length, H—channel height. (

**b**) Geometry of the Pt-100 thermometer filled with air, the dimensions are in mm. The 0.9 mm end walls are modelled as oscillatory boundary conditions with the frequency $f=20$ kHz.

**Figure 2.**Comparison of the x and y components of streaming velocity ${u}_{mx}$ and ${u}_{my}$ for various mesh resolution with the results from [4]; (

**Left**): Plots of ${u}_{mx}$ along H of the resonator for $x=0.75$ L; (

**Right**): Plots of ${u}_{my}$ along H of the resonator for $x=0.5$ L.

**Figure 3.**Comparison of the current results with [4] for various temperature difference between the top and bottom wall; (

**Left**): plots of ${u}_{mx}$ along height of the domain for $x=0.75$ L; (

**Right**): plots of ${u}_{my}$ for $x=0.5$ L.

**Figure 4.**Comparison of the x-component of instantaneous total velocity

**u**, along horizontal mid-plane of the resonator at four different instants: $\omega t=(0,\pi /2,\pi ,3/2\pi $), obtained in the current study with the results from [4], case 1A*.

**Figure 5.**Streamlines, magnitude, and vectors of the streaming velocity ${\mathrm{U}}_{\mathrm{m}}$ for f = 20 kHz, cases 1A*, 1B* and 1C*. (

**a**) Case 1A* (isothermal flow). (

**b**) Case 1B*, $\Delta T=20$ K. (

**c**) Case 1C*, $\Delta T=60$ K.

**Figure 6.**Streamlines depicting streaming velocity ${\mathrm{U}}_{\mathrm{m}}$ for cases 2A–2C (f = 40 kHz). (

**a**) Case 2A (isothermal flow). (

**b**) Case 2B, $\Delta T=20$ K. (

**c**) Case 2C, $\Delta T=60$ K.

**Figure 7.**Streamlines depicting streaming velocity ${\mathrm{U}}_{\mathrm{m}}$ for Cases 3A–3C (f = 80 kHz). (

**a**) Case 3A (isothermal flow). (

**b**) Case 3B, $\Delta T=20$ K. (

**c**) Case 3C, $\Delta T=60$ K.

**Figure 8.**Changes of scalar metrics of: (

**a**) streaming velocity ${\overline{u}}_{m}$; (

**b**) total velocity $\overline{u}$; (

**c**) fluctuation velocity ${\overline{u}}^{\prime}$; (

**d**) ratio of streaming velocity to fluctuation velocity ${\overline{u}}_{m}/{\overline{u}}^{\prime}$, in the function of $\Delta T$ and frequency f.

**Figure 9.**(

**Left**): comparison of x component of streaming velocity ${u}_{mx}$ for cases 1C*, 2C, and 3C along vertical line for $x=0.75$ L, $0<y<H$; (

**Right**): comparison of y component of streaming velocity ${u}_{my}$ for cases 1C*, 2C, and 3C along vertical line for $x=0.5$ L, $0<y<H$.

**Figure 10.**Velocity magnitude and vectors of streaming on the 2D cross-sections ($xy$ planes) of the 3D resonator for $z=(0.5,0.375,0.125)$ W. (

**a**) $xy$ plane at $z=0.5$ W. (

**b**) $xy$ plane at $z=0.375$ W. (

**c**) $xy$ plane at $z=0.125$ W.

**Figure 11.**Velocity magnitude and vectors of streaming on the 2D cross-sections ($xz$ planes) of the 3D resonator for $y=(0.5,0.375,0.125)$ H. (

**a**) $xz$ plane at $y=0.5$ H. (

**b**) $xz$ plane at $y=0.375$ H. (

**c**) $xz$ plane at $y=0.125$ H.

**Figure 12.**Change of the scalar metric of the streaming flow along the width (

**left**) and height (

**right**) of the resonator.

**Figure 13.**Mean temperature and isotherms for the non-isothermal cases. (

**a**) Case 1B*, $\Delta T=$ 20 K, $f=$ 20 kHz. (

**b**) Case 1C*, $\Delta T=$ 60 K, $f=$ 20 kHz. (

**c**) Case 2B $\Delta T=$ 20 K, $f=$ 40 kHz. (

**d**) Case 2C $\Delta T=$ 60 K, $f=$ 40 kHz. (

**e**) Case 3B, $\Delta T=$ 20 K, $f=$ 80 kHz. (

**f**) Case 3C, $\Delta T=$ 60 K, $f=$ 80 kHz.

**Figure 15.**From the top to bottom: changes of the streaming vertical and horizontal components of velocity, streaming velocity magnitude, and mean temperature along the thermometer channel taken at the height $y=0.825$ H.

**Figure 16.**Comparison of the vertical temperature profiles of the flow with and without streaming for 3 locations $L=(7.5,88.5,165.5)$ mm. (

**Left**): temperature profiles; (

**Right**): temperature difference between flow with and without streaming.

Case | f, kHz | $\mathbf{\Delta}\mathit{T}$, K | L, mm | H, mm | Number of Cells |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

1A | 4500 | ||||

1B | 20 | 60 | 8.825 | 0.64 | 18,000 |

1C | 72,000 | ||||

1A* | 0 | ||||

1B* | 20 | 20 | 8.825 | 0.64 | 72,000 |

1C* | 60 | ||||

2A | 0 | ||||

2B | 40 | 20 | 4.413 | 0.48 | 27,000 |

2C | 60 | ||||

3A | 0 | ||||

3B | 80 | 20 | 2.206 | 0.32 | 27,000 |

3C | 60 |

Case | $\Delta \mathit{T}$, K | f, kHz | ${\mathit{Nu}}_{\mathit{top}}$ | ${\mathit{Nu}}_{\mathit{bot}}$ |
---|---|---|---|---|

1B* | 20 | 20 | 1.321 | 1.258 |

1C* | 60 | 20 | 1.239 | 1.221 |

2B | 20 | 40 | 0.856 | 1.305 |

2C | 60 | 40 | 1.015 | 1.241 |

3B | 20 | 80 | 0.640 | 0.941 |

3C | 60 | 80 | 0.752 | 0.887 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Baran, B.; Machaj, K.; Malecha, Z.; Tomczuk, K.
Numerical Study of Baroclinic Acoustic Streaming Phenomenon for Various Flow Parameters. *Energies* **2022**, *15*, 854.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030854

**AMA Style**

Baran B, Machaj K, Malecha Z, Tomczuk K.
Numerical Study of Baroclinic Acoustic Streaming Phenomenon for Various Flow Parameters. *Energies*. 2022; 15(3):854.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030854

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Baran, Błażej, Krystian Machaj, Ziemowit Malecha, and Krzysztof Tomczuk.
2022. "Numerical Study of Baroclinic Acoustic Streaming Phenomenon for Various Flow Parameters" *Energies* 15, no. 3: 854.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030854