Next Article in Journal
Predicting the Performance of Undeveloped Multi-Fractured Marcellus Gas Wells Using an Analytical Flow-Cell Model (FCM)
Previous Article in Journal
The Degradation Behavior of LiFePO4/C Batteries during Long-Term Calendar Aging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on the Performance of a Novel Compact Electrostatic Coalescer with Helical Electrodes

1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Pipeline Critical Technology and Equipment for Deepwater Oil & Gas Development, School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing 102617, China
2
Beijing Academy of Safety Engineering and Technology, Beijing 102617, China
3
Beijing Zhongyuan Energy. Co., Ltd., Beijing 100101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(6), 1733; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061733
Submission received: 10 December 2020 / Revised: 27 February 2021 / Accepted: 16 March 2021 / Published: 20 March 2021

Abstract

:
As most of the light and easy oil fields have been produced or are nearing their end-life, the emulsion stability is enhanced and water cut is increasing in produced fluid which have brought challenges to oil–water separation in onshore and offshore production trains. The conventional solution to these challenges includes a combination of higher chemical dosages, larger vessels and more separation stages, which often demands increased energy consumption, higher operating costs and larger space for the production facility. It is not always feasible to address the issues by conventional means, especially for the separation process on offshore platforms. Electrostatic coalescence is an effective method to achieve demulsification and accelerate the oil–water separation process. In this paper, a novel compact electrostatic coalescer with helical electrodes was developed and its performance on treatment of water-in-oil emulsions was investigated by experiments. Focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) was used to make real-time online measurements of water droplet sizes in the emulsion. The average water droplet diameters and number of droplets within a certain size range are set as indicators for evaluating the effect of coalescence. We investigated the effect of electric field strength, frequency, water content and fluid velocity on the performance of coalescence. The experimental results showed that increasing the electric field strength could obviously contribute to the growth of small water droplets and coalescence. The extreme value of electric field strength achieved in the high-frequency electric field was much higher than that in the power-frequency (50 Hz) electric field, which can better promote the growth of water droplets. The initial average diameters of water droplets increase with higher water content. The rate of increment in the electric field was also increased. Its performance was compared with that of the plate electrodes to further verify the advantages of enhancing electrostatic coalescence and demulsification with helical electrodes. The research results can provide guidance for the optimization and performance improvement of a compact electrocoalescer.

1. Introduction

As the oil well’s production life increases, the water content in the oil also grows. It is usually in the form of water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion or oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion, which depends on the value of water cut. The existence of such emulsions brings challenges in offshore crude oil production. Firstly, the large amount of water and oil phase can easily form the water in oil emulsion and in the colloidal state because of its high stability and viscosity during multiphase transportation, which causes substantial transport problems. Secondly, the process of removing water at the platform is usually achieved in large horizontal separators with the help of gravity and demulsifying chemicals. It is time-consuming and expensive to make the water content below 0.5% during the treatment when the water cut reaches more than 90%. Therefore, it is necessary to use more effective and compact methods to separate water from oil [1]. Nowadays, possible separation methods of water-in-oil emulsions include gravity or centrifugal settling [2,3], thermal treatment, chemical demulsification [4,5,6], pH adjustment [7], electrostatic demulsification [8,9,10], the freeze/thaw method, filtration, membrane separation, microwave radiation and ultrasonic energy, etc. [11,12,13,14]. Compared with the other widely used or tried solutions, electrostatic demulsification is becoming more and more popular, both from environmental and economical points of view [12].
Generally, it involves three stages for the water-droplet pair electrocoalescence in W/O emulsion. Firstly, the droplets should approach each other and be very close under the action of various long-range flocculation forces. Secondly, the drainage or thinning of the film occurs to reduce the interfacial area. Once the film thickness reaches a critical value, the breakdown or rupture of the film will be easily achieved if there is some instability or disturbance [11]. Urdahl et al. [15] and Harpur et al. [16] investigated electrostatic destabilization of water-in-oil emulsions with a water content up to 30% under flowing conditions in the laboratory. The experimental results showed that the droplet size increased up to a factor of 10 after flowing through the rectangular electrocoalescer. Since the late 1990s, the electrocoalescence technology has received extensive attention and development, in order to further improve the separation efficiency of the horizontal gravity separator and the electric dehydrator and reduce the overall investment, construction and operating costs of facilities. Various types of electrostatic coalescers have been developed [17,18,19]. The compact electrostatic coalescer (CEC) [20] and inline electro coalescer (IEC) [21,22] were the typical representatives. From the perspective of their working mechanisms, they both involve electrostatic coalescence and demulsification characteristics of W/O emulsions under non-uniform electric fields. The effect of the electric field is mainly related to the properties of the oil–water phase and the type of electrode [23]. Flow conditions could also affect the electrocoalescence process. In the common commercial horizontal electrocoalescer, it usually obtains the laminar flow condition of the fluid and the gravity is set as the primary action [24]. Atten [25] found that the electric coalescence efficiency of water droplets in W/O emulsion under moderate turbulence flow condition is better than that in the laminar flow condition. Urdahl et al. [26] also pointed out that turbulence contributes to droplet coalescence. However, the droplet will be dispersed or broken-up if the turbulent intensity reaches a certain value. There is an optimal turbulence intensity that could make full use of the positive effects of disrupting the water-droplet chains whilst avoiding the negative effects of dispersing the larger droplets. Melheim and Matteo [27] studied a model of a turbulent electrocoalescer numerically in the Eulerian–Lagrangian framework. The results showed that the collision frequency is mainly controlled by the turbulence and turbulent electrocoalescence works well for all simulated water contents. Li et al. [28] experimentally studied the demulsification efficiency of W/O emulsion by combining with centrifugal and electrical fields in a novel device. The influence of electric frequency, voltage and rotational speed on the separation efficiency were both investigated. Nath [29] investigated the dynamics of viscoplastic droplets under the combined action of electric field and shear flow by performing direct numerical simulations. The simulations reveal that the relative competition of shear, electric, and surface tension forces ultimately decides the mechanism of the droplet disintegration. Ismail et al. [30] developed a compact high-performance electrostatic coalescer and made tests on an Arab medium crude oil under different process conditions, including different temperatures and electric field strengths. Several static mixers with different geometries were housed in the compact inline coalescer chamber and tested for their properties in the electrostatic-enhanced demulsification process. The results show that installing a static mixer in the electrostatic coalescer cell can improve the oil dehydration performance by creating a favorable mild turbulence flow. Sameer and Rochish [31] used different kinds of electrode systems such as quadrupole, pin-plate, four-pin and annular electrodes to generate the non-uniform electric fields. The coalescence behavior of emulsions in the non-uniform electric fields was analyzed and the results were compared with those in a uniform field. The results showed that in W/O emulsion, an asymmetric non-uniform field generated using the pin-plate electrodes is found to be advantageous as compared to the uniform and symmetric quadrupole non-uniform electric fields. Luo et al. [32] experimentally studied the effect of field nonuniformity on the electrocoalescence of W/O emulsion under different electric field configurations including coaxial cylindrical electrodes, pin-plane electrodes and parallel plate electrodes through microscopic observation and image analysis. The results showed that non-uniform fields can enhance the performance of electrocoalescence compared to uniform fields due to the combined effects of dipole–dipole interaction and dielectrophoresis. Li et al. [33] studied the performance of a novel electrode geometry which is formed into a V-shape and generates non-uniform electric field. The performance of this novel electrode was investigated for different electrical parameters, fluid physical properties and residence time by experiment and numerical simulation. The results showed that the electrocoalescence of W/O emulsion could be enhanced since the electrical attractive force between neighboring droplets is promoted with the compact design. Zhou et al. [34] investigated the effect of dielectrophoresis on the coalescence of binary droplets under a non-uniform electric field. The results showed that the effects of dielectrophoresis on coalescence vary with different electrodes. For positive dielectrophoresis, there is a critical distance of coalescence and it is affected by the electric field intensity, continuous phase viscosity, and droplet diameter. Gong et al. [35] studied the separation performance of a demulsification and dewatering device coupling electric and centrifugal fields by numerical and experimental methods. The results indicate that numerical results obtained by computational fluid dynamic coupling with a population balance model (PBM) are in good accordance with experiments. Furthermore, the effects of droplet dynamic characteristics cannot be ignored in the oil–water separation process. Due to the structure limitation of the annular flow channel in CEC and rectangular flow channel in IEC, it is difficult to sufficiently promote the collision and coalescence of the dispersed water droplets in crude oil emulsions under suitable flow conditions. Therefore, there is still great potential to enhance the demulsification and coalescence efficiency.
This paper is based on the fact that proper turbulence can promote electrostatic coalescence. The electrode structure is changed to generate a suitable flow condition and to sufficiently promote the electrostatic coalescence of water droplets by fully take advantages of the flow conditions and electric fields. A novel compact electrostatic coalescer with helical electrodes is developed. The residence time could be prolonged and the turbulence flow condition is produced in the helical channel. Thus, the electrocoalescence is promoted. The performance of novel compact electrostatic coalescer is experimentally studied and the influence of the electric field strength, frequency, W/O emulsion velocity and water content in the emulsion on the demulsification are investigated. The experimental results are compared with those of the electrostatic coalescer with parallel plate electrodes.

2. Geometry of the Novel Electrostatic Coalescer

The structure of the novel compact electrostatic coalescer is shown in Figure 1. It mainly contains the helical electrodes, insulated central shaft, insulated cylinder, fluid inlet and outlet and the part to connect a high voltage line. The helical electrodes are composed by helical blades and mounted alternately. They are separately connected to the high-power voltage and the ground. A nonuniformed electric field is generated between the helical electrodes. Meanwhile, the W/O emulsions flow through the helical channel between the two types of electrodes. It puts the emulsion into a transitional flow or weakly turbulent flow conditions, which contributes to increasing the collision rate of water droplets and thus promotes the demulsification coalescence efficiency.
The design flowrate of the compact electrostatic coalescer is 2 m3/h. The inlet and outlet pipe diameters are both 12.7 mm. The main geometry parameters are shown in Table 1. There are four helical blades and the pitch between each blade is 35 mm. Figure 2 shows a picture of the compact electrostatic coalescer. The demulsification performance in the uniformed electric field generated by parallel plate electrodes will be compared with that of the helical electrodes.

3. Experimental Procedure

The experimental chart of the compact electrostatic coalescer is shown in Figure 2. It contains the emulsion supply tank, pneumatic double diaphragm pump, IKA high shear dispersing machine, FBRM, waste liquid recovery tank, etc. The compact electrostatic coalescer is installed between the IKA high shear dispersing machine and FBRM. The diameters and numbers of water droplets in W/O emulsion could be tracked in real-time by the FBRM. The range of droplet diameters that FBRM can measure is 0.5 μm to 3 mm. Figure 3 is a picture of the experiment system. Figure 4 shows the high frequency/high voltage pulse AC power system. It contains the GFG-3015 function generator, Trek Model 10/40A-HS high voltage amplifier and S-620 20 MHz oscilloscope. The function generator can provide a voltage of 0.01 to 10 V and a 10 kHz to 15 MHz frequency. It can also produce different AC or DC waveforms including rectangular wave, sine wave, triangle wave and sawtooth wave. The voltage amplifier can amplify the voltage signal to as high as 1000 times and output 0 to 10 kV voltage whilst keeping the frequency and waveforms constant.
During the experiment, the W/O simulated emulsion was generated by using 10# white oil, water and Span 80 emulsifier. Firstly, a certain amount of 10# white oil was fed into the emulsion supply tank and the oil was allowed to circulate with a constant flowrate in the experimental process by starting the pneumatic double diaphragm pump. Then, the IKA high shear dispersing machine was started with a certain rotational speed and water and emulsifier was injected into the emulsion supply tank in proportion to generate the W/O emulsion. When the generated emulsion stabilized, the high frequency/high voltage pulse AC power was turned on and specific electric field parameters were set. The variations of the distribution of the water droplet diameters were collected by the FBRM in real-time and were used to evaluate the performance of the compact electrostatic coalescer. FBRM is the industry-standard measurement technique used for the in-process measurement of particles. A highly precise chord length distribution (CLD), sensitive to particle size and count, was reported in real time without the need for sampling or sample preparation. No shape is assumed and the measurement can be applied at full process concentrations in opaque or translucent slurries and emulsions. The method of online in-situ measurement can reduce the negative impact on the accuracy of the measurement results during the dilution process for the sampling if using the traditional method.
During the experiment, the influence of electric parameters and flow conditions such as electric field strength, frequency, water content and flow velocity on the novel compact electrostatic coalescer performance were investigated. Meanwhile, the performance of the electrostatic coalescer with parallel-plate electrodes was also studied and the results were compared with that of the novel compact electrostatic coalescer.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Research on Characteristics of Test Emulsion System

Since the experiment is conducted by circulating the W/O emulsion in the flow loop with various electric parameters, it is necessary to ensure the reliability and repeatability of experimental results. In order to determine the effect of increased shear time and enhanced emulsion stability on the experimental results of electrostatic coalescence equipment, the experiment was repeated several times with the same W/O emulsion and same electric parameters. Figure 5 shows the variations of water droplet numbers in W/O emulsion. The vertical axis in Figure 5 represents the number of water droplets within 10 μm. The horizontal axis in Figure 5 represents the experiment time. The experiment was conducted continuously for 30 min. During the experiment, the electric field was powered on and off several times. The electric field strength is 1.8 kV/cm and the frequency is 50 Hz. Figure 6 shows the variations of the average droplet diameter. It can be concluded that once the high voltage power is on, water droplets with diameters less than 10 μm are rapidly coalesced under the electrical field. Additionally, the number of small water droplets decreased, but decreased slightly as time went on, which is mainly related to the characteristics of the flow-loop system itself. The water and oil emulsions demulsified by the electrostatic coalescer were finally returned to the emulsion supply tank and were mixed with the original emulsion. Thus, the stability of the initial emulsion changed to some extent. When the high voltage power is off, the shearing effect becomes the domain factor again and the emulsion system gradually recovers to its original state. Figure 5 shows that the number of small water droplets rapidly decreases when the electric is powered on at about 200 s. Then, the decrease trend becomes less pronounced. The main reason is that the coalescence effect under the electric field is stronger than the emulsification effect under the high shear dispersing machine. As the electric field action time extends, the actual number of water droplets flowing through the electrostatic coalescer is less than the number when the power is just turned on.
From Figure 5 and Figure 6, it can be concluded that the experiment could be conducted with highly repeatable results within 15 min. Once the experiment time is more than 15 min, the average droplet diameter in the emulsion system and number of small water droplets within 10 μm both increases. With the same electric field parameters, the increment of the average water droplet diameter and the decrement of the droplet number are kept relatively constant. Based on the above discussion, red dotted lines are used to represent the measured values before and after the power is working. The difference before and after power-on is applied to characterize the demulsification performance under different electric field parameters.

4.2. Effect of the Electric Field Strength

The flowrate, water content, rotational speed of high shear dispersing machine and other condition parameters were kept constant. The electric frequency was 50 Hz. The coalescence performance with different electric field strengths has been investigated. Parameters are shown in Table 2.
Figure 7 shows the variations of the number of water droplets within 10 μm in the emulsion as time increases under different electric field strengths. It can be seen that the device has a short circuit which causes the power supply to start overload protection when the electric field strength is 2 kV/cm. There is a minimum electric field strength which keeps the water droplets within 10 μm coalesce. It could not promote the coalescence of small water droplets when the electric field strength was less than 0.8 kV/cm. Once the electric field strength increased to 1.0 kV/cm, the number of small water droplets decreased by 12% compared to that in the initial conditions. When it reached 1.8 kV/cm, the number of small water droplets decreased by 31%, which shows that increasing the electric field strength has a significant effect on promoting the coalescence and growth of small water droplets. Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the change trend of the number of water droplets with the diameter ranges 10 to 50 μm, 50 to 100 μm, 100 to 150 μm and 150 to 300 μm, respectively. It can be concluded that water droplets within 50 μm could rapidly coalesce while the number of those range 50 to 300 μm clearly increases. It indicates that the demulsification effect is remarkable. It is worth mentioning that the number of water droplets in the range of 50 to 100 μm did not rise quickly when the power was off, as shown in Figure 11. It just slowly recovered to the initial state. This demonstrates that the stability of the emulsion system with water particles in the range of 50 to 100 μm is the strongest.
Figure 12 shows the variations of the average water droplet diameter under different electric field strengths. The initial average water droplet diameter is about 18 μm. It is rapidly increased in a short of time once the power is on.

4.3. Effect of the Electric Frequency

Based on the above studies, the electric field strength is set to 1.8 kV/cm. The effect of the electric frequency on the performance of the compact electrostatic coalescer is investigated in this part. The influence of the electric field strength with high electric frequency (3000 Hz) has also been studied. The parameters are listed on Table 3.
Figure 13 shows the variation of the average water droplet diameter in the emulsion system as time increases. On the left part of this figure, the electric frequency ranges from 50 Hz to 3000 Hz while the electric field strength is kept at 1.8 kV/cm. It indicated that the average droplet diameter increases by about 28% compared to the initial value. The effect of the electric field on the coalescence performance is weakened as the frequency increases. The maximum electric field strength that can be achieved is 1.8 kV/cm with a frequency of 50 Hz, as shown in Figure 12. It is hard to determine the optimized electric field parameters according to the variation of droplet diameters under that frequency (50 Hz).
On the right part of Figure 13, the coalescence performance in the compact electrostatic coalescer with a helical electrode under different electric field strengths and high electric frequency 3000 Hz is investigated to find the optimized value. The results showed that the maximum electric field strength can be as high as 4.8 kV/cm with a high electric frequency, 3000 Hz, which is much higher than that with 50 Hz. The average droplet diameter increases by about 54% with an electric field strength of 3 kV/cm. The increase of the average water droplet size decreases slightly when further increasing the electric field intensity. However, the electrostatic coalescence effect is not significantly weakened, even if the electric field strength is excessive. It also verifies the superiority of the high frequency electric field in avoiding a short circuit.
Based on the above analysis, the influence of electric field frequency on power consumption is investigated with an electric field strength of 1.8 kV/cm. In the experiment, the power value of the power supply was calculated by recording the actual output average voltage and average current. Figure 14 shows the variation of the average power of the power supply at different frequencies. The average power value is significantly different under various electric field frequencies. As the electric field frequency increases, the average current value decreases and the actual power consumption of the power supply is also reduced. The power consumption at 3000 Hz is decreased by about 40% compared to that at 50 Hz. It is lower than the power consumption at 50 Hz, which shows a significant energy-saving effect.

4.4. Effect of the Water Content

The emulsification performance of the compact electrostatic coalescer under different emulsion water contents (10, 20, 30, and 40%) is studied in this part. The amount of emulsifier (Span 80) added in the emulsion is 7 g/L to better formulate the emulsion. The rotational speed of the high-shear dispersing machine is 8000 r/min. The emulsion flow velocity in the electrostatic coalescer is 0.44 m/s.
(1)
Water content: 10%
Figure 15 shows the variations of average water droplets size in the emulsion with a water content of 10%. Figure 16 shows the number of water droplets within 10 μm. Comparing the experimental results with a water content of 10% and those with water a content of 15% in Figure 13, it can be found that a higher electric field intensity can be achieved at a lower water content. The number of water droplets is greatly reduced and the average droplet size is significantly increased as the electric field intensity increases. However, for emulsions with lower water content, a higher electric field intensity is required to achieve the same average droplet size with high water content.
(2)
Water content: 20%
Figure 17 shows the variations of the average water droplet size in the emulsion with a water content of 20% and Figure 18 shows the number of water droplets within 10 μm. Under the conditions with an electric frequency of 50 Hz, the short circuit occurs as the electric field intensity increases to 1.2 kV/cm. The maximum electric field intensity that can be achieved under a high-frequency electric field (3000 Hz) is 4.0 kV/cm and a short circuit did not occur under an excessive power voltage. Compared to the demulsification result of the emulsion with a water content of 10%, the initial average droplet size is larger at a water content of 20% and the increment amplitude of the average droplet size after the coalescence also grows.
(3)
Water content: 30%
Figure 19 shows the variations of the average water droplet size in the emulsion with a water content of 30% and Figure 20 shows the number of water droplets within 10 μm. As the water content increases, the maximum electric field strength that can be loaded is reduced to 0.8 kV/cm with an electric frequency of 50 Hz, while the maximum electric field strength can be as high as 2.6 kV/cm under the high frequency of 3000 Hz. By comparing the demulsification effect among different water contents—10, 20 and 30%—under a high-frequency electric field (3000 Hz), the best demulsification performances are almost the same, although the ultimate electric field strengths that can be applied are different.
(4)
Water content: 40%
Figure 21 shows the variations of the average water droplet size in the emulsion with a water content of 40%. It is difficult to handle emulsions under a water content of 40% with metal electrodes. The highest electric field strength that can be achieved is just 0.05 kV/cm under a 50 Hz electric frequency. Short circuit occurs once the electric field strength is higher than that value. Although there is no short circuit when the frequency increases to 1500 Hz and 3000 Hz, the maximum electric field strength is only 0.06 kV/cm. There is severe electric field attenuation under high water content. In order to ensure a good demulsification effect under high water content, the insulated metal electrodes should be used with the combination of high-frequency/high-voltage pulsed AC power system.

4.5. Effect of the Fluid Velocity

Based on the above experiment results, the optimized electric field parameters are selected with electric field strength of 3 kV/cm and frequency of 1500 Hz. The effect of emulsion velocity on the compact electrostatic coalescer demulsification performance is investigated in this part. The emulsion velocities are 0.36, 0.53, 0.65 and 0.75 m/s. More parameters are shown in Table 4.
Figure 22 shows the variations of the average water droplet diameter with different velocities. The emulsion flow velocity affects the electrostatic coalescence of water droplets mainly by changing the fluid residence time in the electric field and turbulent status. As the velocity increases, the emulsion turbulent state is enhanced. A moderate turbulence state contributes to water droplet coalescence, but it reduces the fluid resident time and thus affects the electrostatic coalescer demulsification efficiency. It shows that decreasing the fluid velocity can obviously promote the coalescence of water droplets by extending the residence time in the electric field. Figure 23 is the chord length distribution of water droplets with different velocities. The trends of the curves between the number of water droplets and the chord length under different velocities are the same. The number of small water droplets is greatly reduced while that of large droplets increases slightly. Additionally, the median number of water droplets grows with the decrease of fluid velocity.

4.6. Comparison of Performance between the Helical Electrode and Parallel-Plate Electrode

The comparison of the demulsification performance between the compact electrostatic coalescer with a helical electrode and parallel plate electrode are experimentally studied.
Figure 24 shows the variation of the average water droplet size with the electric field action time under different electric field strengths. The electric frequency is 50 Hz all the time. Although the maximum electric field strengths with the parallel plate electrode (2.0 kV/cm) is higher than that with the helical electrode (1.8 kV/cm from Figure 12), there is almost no change for the average water droplet size under the action of the electric field if the electric field strength is less than 1.6 kV/cm with the parallel-plate electrode. When the electric field strength is higher than 1.6 kV/cm, the average water droplet size tends to increase when the power is on. As the electric field strength increases to 1.8 kV/cm, the average water droplet size is increased by 58% compared to the initial value with the helical electrode, while that with parallel plate electrode is increased by 24%. There are obvious differences between these two different electrodes. The comparison results once again confirm that the demulsification performance of compact electrostatic coalescer can be significantly enhanced by using the helical electrode.

5. Conclusions

The experiment studies were carried out on the demulsification performance of a novel compact electrostatic coalescer with helical electrodes under different flow conditions and electric field parameters. The effects of the electric field strength, frequency, water content and fluid velocity on the demulsification performance were analyzed. The demulsification performance of the novel electrostatic coalescer with a helical electrode was also compared to that with a parallel-plate electrode under the same conditions. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
The application of helical electrodes can help to increase the average residence time of water droplets in the electric field and the emulsion turbulence is also moderately enhanced. It has a better demulsification performance compared with the electrostatic coalescer with parallel-plate electrodes under the same working conditions. This proves that moderate turbulence is beneficial to promote electrostatic coalescence and the helical electrode can improve the performance of electrostatic coalescence and demulsification.
(2)
Under the high-frequency/high-voltage AC-pulsed electric field, the water content that the electrostatic coalescer can treat is also high even if the metal helical electrode is used. It has a better demulsification effect and lower equipment energy consumption under a high-frequency/high-voltage AC-pulsed electric field. The high frequency electric field has more obvious advantages than the power frequency (50 Hz) electric field. The combination of an electrostatic coalescer with a helical electrode and high-frequency/high-voltage pulse AC power supply technology is feasible
(3)
Increasing the residence time of water droplets in the electric field and forming moderate turbulence can both promote electrostatic coalescence. The influence of fluid velocity and the residence time in the electric field should be comprehensively considered when designing an electrostatic coalescer. It is particularly important to determine the appropriate fluid velocity.

Author Contributions

Y.S. wrote the paper and carried out part of the experiment; J.C. determined the structure of this paper and gave suggestions for the improvement of the paper; Z.P. carried out part of the experiment. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Enterprise Innova-tion and Development Joint Fund (No. U20B2030), the Joint Fund of the Beijing Municipal Education Commission and Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. KZ202010017026).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hamoud, A.A.; Al Ghamdi, S.M. Applications of Multiphase Technologies Optimize Upstream Operations in Saudi Aramco. In Proceedings of the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, Perth, Australia, 20–22 October 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sun, D.Z.; Jong, S.C.; Duan, X.D.; Zhou, D. Demulsification of water-in-oil emulsion by wetting coalescence materials in stirred- and packed-columns. Colloids Surf. A 1999, 150, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  3. Menon, V.B. Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology; Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1985; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu, J.; Xu, Y.; Dabros, T.; Hamza, H. Effect of demulsifier properties on destabilization of water-in-oil emulsion. Energy Fuels 2003, 17, 1554–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mohammed, R.A.; Bailey, A.I.; Luckham, P.F.; Taylor, S.E. Dewatering of crude oil emulsions. 3. Emulsion resolution by chemical means. Colloids Surf. A 1994, 83, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, D.; Yang, D.L.; Huang, C.; Yang, D.Z. Stabilization mechanism and chemical demulsification of water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions in petroleum industry: A review. Fuel 2021, 286, 119390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lissant, K.J. Demulsification: Industrial Application; Surfactant Science Series 13; Marcel Dekkar: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mori, Y.; Tanigaki, M.; Maehara, N.; Eguchi, W. Effect of Frequency in a.c. high voltage on coalescence of water-in-oil emulsion stabilized with sorbitan monooleate type nonionic surfactant. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1994, 27, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Simone, L.; Hannisdal, A.; Sjöblom, J. An electrorheological study on the behavior of water-in-crude oil emulsions under influence of a DC electric field and different flow conditions. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2008, 29, 106–114. [Google Scholar]
  10. Simone, L.; Hannisdal, A.; Bjørklund, E.; Sjöblom, J. Electrostatic destabilization of water-in-crude oil emulsions: Application to a real case and evaluation of the Aibel VIEC technology. Fuel 2008, 87, 2572–2581. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eow, J.S.; Mojtaba, G.; Sharif, A.O. Electrostatic enhancement of coalescence of water droplets in oil: A review of the current understanding. Chem. Eng. J. 2001, 84, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ferreira, B.M.S.; Ramalho, J.B.V.S.; Lucas, E.F. Demulsification of water-in-crude oil emulsions by microwave radiation: Effect of aging, demulsifier addition, and selective heating. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luo, X.M.; Gong, H.Y.; Cao, J.H.; Yin, H.R. Enhanced separation of water-in-oil emulsions using ultrasonic standing waves. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 203, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reza, Z.; Ahmadun, F.; Luqman, C.; Abdullah, S.; Elnashaie, A.P. Demulsification techniques of water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions in petroleum industry. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 170, 377–407. [Google Scholar]
  15. Urdahl, O.; Williams, T.J.; Bailey, A.G. Electrostatic destabilization of water-in-oil emulsions under conditions of turbulent-flow. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1996, 74, 158–165. [Google Scholar]
  16. Harpur, I.G.; Wayth, N.J.; Bailey, A.G. Destabilisation of water-in-oil emulsions under the influence of an AC electric field: Experimental assessment of performance. J. Electrost. 1997, 40, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gary, W.S.; Floyd, L.P.; Merle, B.I. Apparatus for Augmenting the Coalescence of Water in a Water-in-Oil Emulsion. US Patent 5,565,078, 15 October 1996. [Google Scholar]
  18. Isabelle, P.; Alexandre, R. Process for Separating Phases of Different Densities and Conductivities by Electrocoalescence and Centrifugation. US Patent 5,643,469, 1 July 1997. [Google Scholar]
  19. Berry, J.P.; Stewart, J.M.; Adrian, G.B. Compact Electrostatic Coalescer. US Patent 6,136,174 A1, 24 October 2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. Urdahl, O.; Nordstad, K.; Berry, P. Development of a New Compact Electrostatic Coalescer Concept. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA, 30 September–3 October 2001. [Google Scholar]
  21. Westra, R.; Akdim, M.R. Compact oil-water separation using the inline electrocoalescer and the cyclonic dewaterer. In Proceedings of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 15–17 November 2011. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grave, E.J.; Olson, M.D.; Menchaca, A.E. Performance testing of an inline electrocoalescer device with medium and heavy crudes. Oil Gas Facil. 2015, 4, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Taylor, S.E. Theory and practice of electrically enhanced phase separation of water-in-oil emulsions. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1996, 74, 526–540. [Google Scholar]
  24. Christine, N.; Chen, J.Q.; Christine, D. Electrostatic Demulsification on Crude Oil: A State-of-the-Art Review. In Proceedings of the SPE International Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Beijing, China, 5–7 December 2006. [Google Scholar]
  25. Atten, P. Electrocoalescence of water droplets in an insulating liquid. J. Electrost. 1993, 30, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Urdahl, O.; Wayth, N.J.; Fordedal, H. Encyclopedic Handbook of Emulsion Technology; Sjöblom, J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; pp. 679–693. [Google Scholar]
  27. Melheim, J.A.; Matteo, C. Simulation of turbulent electrocoalescence. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2006, 61, 4540–4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Q.; Chen, J.Q.; Liang, M. Investigation of water separation from water-in-oil emulsion using high-frequency pulsed AC electric field by new equipment. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2015, 36, 918–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nath, B.; Borthakur, M.P.; Biswas, G. Electric field induced dynamics of viscoplastic droplets in shear flow. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32, 092110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ismail, A.S.M.; Menchaca, A.E.; Balk, W.; Akdim, M.R.; Less, S.; Oshinowo, L. High-performance electrostatic coalescer-a novel technology for improving the economics of oil-water separation. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 9–12 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sameer, M.; Rochish, T. Electrocoalescence in non-uniform electric fields: An experimental study. Chem. Eng. Process. 2015, 96, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  32. Luo, S.R.; Jarrod, S.; Luo, T.F. Effect of electric field non-uniformity on droplets coalescence. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 29786–29796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, B.; Vivacqua, V.; Wang, J.F. Electrocoalescence of water droplets in sunflower oil using a novel electrode geometry. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2019, 152, 226–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, Y.T.; Li, B.; Zhang, M.Y.; Sun, Z.Q.; Wang, Z.B.; Wang, J.J. Effect of dielectrophoresis on the coalescence of binary droplets under a non-uniform electric field. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 224, 115739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gong, H.F.; Li, W.L.; Zhang, X.M.; Peng, Y.; Yu, B.; Mou, Y. Effects of droplet dynamic characteristics on the separation performance of a demulsification and dewatering device coupling electric and centrifugal fields. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 257, 117905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of compact electrostatic coalescer with helical electrodes. (a) 3D assembly model; (b) cross-section view of the assembly.
Figure 1. Structure of compact electrostatic coalescer with helical electrodes. (a) 3D assembly model; (b) cross-section view of the assembly.
Energies 14 01733 g001
Figure 2. Experimental chart of test system.
Figure 2. Experimental chart of test system.
Energies 14 01733 g002
Figure 3. Picture of the experiment system.
Figure 3. Picture of the experiment system.
Energies 14 01733 g003
Figure 4. High frequency/high voltage pulse AC power system.
Figure 4. High frequency/high voltage pulse AC power system.
Energies 14 01733 g004
Figure 5. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm.
Figure 5. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm.
Energies 14 01733 g005
Figure 6. Average water droplet diameters.
Figure 6. Average water droplet diameters.
Energies 14 01733 g006
Figure 7. Variations of water droplet number within 10 μm.
Figure 7. Variations of water droplet number within 10 μm.
Energies 14 01733 g007
Figure 8. Variations of water droplet number within 10 to 50 μm.
Figure 8. Variations of water droplet number within 10 to 50 μm.
Energies 14 01733 g008
Figure 9. Variations of water droplet number within 50 to 100 μm.
Figure 9. Variations of water droplet number within 50 to 100 μm.
Energies 14 01733 g009
Figure 10. Variations of water droplets number within 100 to 150 μm.
Figure 10. Variations of water droplets number within 100 to 150 μm.
Energies 14 01733 g010
Figure 11. Variations of water droplet number within 150 to 300 μm.
Figure 11. Variations of water droplet number within 150 to 300 μm.
Energies 14 01733 g011
Figure 12. Average water droplet diameters.
Figure 12. Average water droplet diameters.
Energies 14 01733 g012
Figure 13. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters.
Figure 13. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters.
Energies 14 01733 g013
Figure 14. Relationship between power and electric field frequency.
Figure 14. Relationship between power and electric field frequency.
Energies 14 01733 g014
Figure 15. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 10%).
Figure 15. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 10%).
Energies 14 01733 g015
Figure 16. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm (water content 10%).
Figure 16. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm (water content 10%).
Energies 14 01733 g016
Figure 17. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 20%).
Figure 17. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 20%).
Energies 14 01733 g017
Figure 18. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm (water content 20%).
Figure 18. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm (water content 20%).
Energies 14 01733 g018
Figure 19. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 30%).
Figure 19. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 30%).
Energies 14 01733 g019
Figure 20. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm (water content 30%).
Figure 20. Variations of water droplets number within 10 μm (water content 30%).
Energies 14 01733 g020
Figure 21. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 40%).
Figure 21. Variations of average water droplet size under different electric field parameters (water content 40%).
Energies 14 01733 g021
Figure 22. Variations of average water droplet size under different fluid velocities.
Figure 22. Variations of average water droplet size under different fluid velocities.
Energies 14 01733 g022
Figure 23. Variations of water droplet number under different chord lengths.
Figure 23. Variations of water droplet number under different chord lengths.
Energies 14 01733 g023
Figure 24. Variations of average water droplet size with parallel plate electrode.
Figure 24. Variations of average water droplet size with parallel plate electrode.
Energies 14 01733 g024
Table 1. The main parameters of compact electrostatic coalescer.
Table 1. The main parameters of compact electrostatic coalescer.
ParametersValue
Design volume flowrate (m3/h)2
Inlet diameter (mm)12.7
Outlet diameter (mm)12.7
Outlet diameter of helical blade (mm)30
Inner diameter of helical blade (mm)18
Thickness of helical blade (mm)3
Length of the helical channel (mm)500
Table 2. Parameters to study the influence of electric field strength on demulsification.
Table 2. Parameters to study the influence of electric field strength on demulsification.
Flow Condition ParametersElectrical Field Parameters
Velocity
(m/s)
Water Content
(%)
Amount of Emulsifier
(g/L)
Rotational Speed of Shear Dispersing Machine
(r/min)
Electric Frequency
(Hz)
Electric Field Strength
(kV/cm)
0.441578000500.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Table 3. Parameters to study the influence of electric frequency.
Table 3. Parameters to study the influence of electric frequency.
Flow Condition ParametersElectrical Field Parameters
Velocity
(m/s)
Water Content
(%)
Amount of Emulsifier
(g/L)
Rotational Speed of Shear Dispersing Machine (r/min)Electric Field Strength (kV/cm)Electric Frequency (Hz)
0.4415780001.850
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2.23000
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.1
3.2
4.0
4.8
Table 4. Parameters to study the influence of emulsion velocity.
Table 4. Parameters to study the influence of emulsion velocity.
Flow Conditions Electric Field Parameters
Water Content
(%)
Amount of Emulsifier
(g/L)
Rotational Speed of Shear Dispersing Machine (r/min)Velocity
(m/s)
Electric Frequency
(Hz)
Electric Field Strength
(kV/cm)
15780000.3615003
0.53
0.65
0.75
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, Y.; Chen, J.; Pan, Z. Experimental Study on the Performance of a Novel Compact Electrostatic Coalescer with Helical Electrodes. Energies 2021, 14, 1733. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061733

AMA Style

Shi Y, Chen J, Pan Z. Experimental Study on the Performance of a Novel Compact Electrostatic Coalescer with Helical Electrodes. Energies. 2021; 14(6):1733. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061733

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Yi, Jiaqing Chen, and Zehao Pan. 2021. "Experimental Study on the Performance of a Novel Compact Electrostatic Coalescer with Helical Electrodes" Energies 14, no. 6: 1733. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061733

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop