Introductory Review of Energy Efficiency in Buildings Retrofits
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Building Retrofits and Architectural Design
2.1. Energy Policies and Building Renovation
2.2. Assessment Tools
2.3. Deep Retrofits versus Non-Invasive Retrofits
3. Energy Efficiency in Building Design
3.1. Passive Systems
3.2. Active Systems and Building Service Systems
3.3. Control and Management Strategies
4. Optimisation Processes
4.1. Performance-Based Architectural Design
4.2. Multi-Objective Optimisation
4.3. Building Information Modelling (BIM)
- Understanding climate, culture, and place;
- Understanding the building typology;
- Reducing the resource consumption need;
- Using free local resources and natural systems;
- Using efficient human-made systems;
- Applying renewable energy generation systems;
- Offsetting negative impacts.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cao, X.; Dai, X.; Liu, J. Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade. Energy Build. 2016, 128, 198–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goswein, V.; Silvestre, J.D.; Freire, F.; Habert, G. Fleet-based LCA applied to the building sector—Environmental and economic analysis of retrofit strategies. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 323, 12172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piderit, M.B.; Agurto, S.; Marín-Restrepo, L. Reconciling energy and heritage: Retrofit of heritage buildings in contexts of energy vulnerability. Sustainibility 2019, 11, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. COM(2014) 15 Final: A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Clean Energy for All Europeans—Unlocking Europe’s Growth Potential; COM(2016) 860 final communication; European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2016; p. 13. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/com_860_final.pdf (accessed on 9 December 2019).
- Hernandez, P.; Kenny, P. From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB). Energy Build. 2010, 42, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blagojević, M.R.; Tufegdžić, A. The new technology era requirements and sustainable approach to industrial heritage renewal. Energy Build. 2016, 115, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbiero, T.; Grillenzoni, C. A statistical analysis of the energy effectiveness of building refurbishment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 114, 109297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broström, T.; Eriksson, P.; Liu, L.; Rohdin, P.; Ståhl, F.; Moshfegh, B. A method to assess the potential for and consequences of energy retrofits in Swedish historic buildings. Hist. Environ. Policy Pract. 2014, 5, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadopoulos, A.M. Forty years of regulations on the thermal performance of the building envelope in Europe: Achievements, perspectives and challenges. Energy Build. 2016, 127, 942–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giama, E.; Papadopoulos, A.M. Assessment tools for the environmental evaluation of concrete, plaster and brick elements production. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 99, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruce-Hyrkäs, T.; Pasanen, P.; Castro, R. Overview of whole building life-cycle assessment for green building certification and ecodesign through industry surveys and interviews. Procedia CIRP 2018, 69, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabeza, L.F.; Rincón, L.; Vilariño, V.; Pérez, G.; Castell, A. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 394–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EU. Labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products & energy performance of buildings. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010, 53, 40. [Google Scholar]
- Krarti, M.; Dubey, K.; Howarth, N. Energy productivity analysis framework for buildings: A case study of GCC region. Energy 2019, 167, 1251–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2018–2020 10. Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy; European Commission: Luxembourg, 2018; Volume 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Galatioto, A.; Ricciu, R.; Salem, T.; Kinab, E. Energy and economic analysis on retrofit actions for Italian public historic buildings. Energy 2019, 176, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lidelöw, S.; Örn, T.; Luciani, A.; Rizzo, A. Energy-efficiency measures for heritage buildings: A literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 45, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Vasconcelos, A.B.; Cabaço, A.; Pinheiro, M.D.; Manso, A. The impact of building orientation and discount rates on a Portuguese reference building refurbishment decision. Energy Policy 2016, 91, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Cooper, P.; Daly, D.; Ledo, L. Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build. 2012, 55, 889–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, J.; Pinheiro, M.D.; de Brito, J. Refurbishment decision support tools review—Energy and life cycle as key aspects to sustainable refurbishment projects. Energy Policy 2013, 62, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ascione, F.; Bianco, N.; Mauro, G.M.; Napolitano, D.F. Retrofit of villas on Mediterranean coastlines: Pareto optimization with a view to energy-efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Appl. Energy 2019, 254, 113705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topouzi, M.; Killip, G.; Fawcett, T.; Owen, A. Deep retrofit approaches: Managing risks to minimise the energy performance gap. In Proceedings of the ECEEE 2019 Summer Study on energy efficiency: Is efficient Sufficient? Presqu’ile de Giens, France, 3–8 June 2019; pp. 1345–1354. [Google Scholar]
- Ballarini, I.; Corrado, V.; Madonna, F.; Paduos, S.; Ravasio, F. Energy refurbishment of the Italian residential building stock: Energy and cost analysis through the application of the building typology. Energy Policy 2017, 105, 148–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Seo, S.; Liao, P.C.; Fang, D. GHG emission reduction performance of state-of-the-art green buildings: Review of two case studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourão, J.; Gomes, R.; Matias, L.; Niza, S. Combining embodied and operational energy in buildings refurbishment assessment. Energy Build. 2019, 197, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamout, S.; Boarin, P.; Melis, A. Correction to: Energy retrofit of existing building stock in Amman: State of the art, obstacles and opportunities. Adv. Stud. Energy Effic. Built Environ. Dev. Ctries. 2019, C1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpino, C.; Bruno, R.; Arcuri, N. Statistical analysis of the heating demand in residential buildings located in Mediterranean climate and proposals for refurbishment. Energy Procedia 2017, 133, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, A.M.T.; Carlos, J.S. The retrofitting of the Bernardas’ Convent in Lisbon. Energy Build. 2014, 68, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shehabi, A.; DeForest, N.; McNeil, A.; Masanet, E.; Greenblatt, J.; Lee, E.S.; Masson, G.; Helms, B.A.; Milliron, D.J. U.S. energy savings potential from dynamic daylighting control glazings. Energy Build. 2013, 66, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hee, W.J.; Alghoul, M.A.; Bakhtyar, B.; Elayeb, O.; Shameri, M.A.; Alrubaih, M.S.; Sopian, K. The role of window glazing on daylighting and energy saving in buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 323–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gago, E.J.; Muneer, T.; Knez, M.; Köster, H. Natural light controls and guides in buildings. Energy saving for electrical lighting, reduction of cooling load. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anastaselos, D.; Giama, E.; Papadopoulos, A.M. An assessment tool for the energy, economic and environmental evaluation of thermal insulation solutions. Energy Build. 2009, 41, 1165–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolattürk, A. Optimum insulation thicknesses for building walls with respect to cooling and heating degree-hours in the warmest zone of Turkey. Build. Environ. 2008, 43, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozel, M. Effect of wall orientation on the optimum insulation thickness by using a dynamic method. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 2429–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dylewski, R.; Adamczyk, J. Economic and ecological indicators for thermal insulating building investments. Energy Build. 2012, 54, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.X.; Li, Y.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Lin, J. Energy performance optimisation of building envelope retrofit through integrated orthogonal arrays with data envelopment analysis. Renew. Energy 2020, 149, 1414–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousefi, F.; Gholipour, Y.; Saboohi, Y.; Yan, W. Interaction of glazing parameters, climatic condition and interior shadings: Performing energy and cost analysis in a residential building in Iran. Energy Effic. 2020, 13, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luddeni, G.; Krarti, M.; Pernigotto, G.; Gasparella, A. An analysis methodology for large-scale deep energy retrofits of existing building stocks: Case study of the Italian office building. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 41, 296–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serghides, D.K.; Michaelidou, M.; Christofi, M.; Dimitriou, S.; Katafygiotou, M. Energy refurbishment towards nearly zero Energy multi-family houses, for Cyprus. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2017, 38, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edeisy, M.; Cecere, C. Envelope retrofit in hot arid climates. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2017, 38, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ariosto, T.; Memari, A.M.; Solnosky, R.L. Development of designer aids for energy efficient residential window retrofit solutions. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2019, 33, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardakan, A.M.; Sok, E.; Niemasz, J. Electrochromic glass vs. fritted glass: An analysis of glare control performance. Energy Procedia 2017, 122, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eshraghi, J.; Narjabadifam, N.; Mirkhani, N.; Khosroshahi, S.S.; Ashjaee, M. A comprehensive feasibility study of applying solar energy to design a zero energy building for a typical home in Tehran. Energy Build. 2014, 72, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenisarin, M.; Mahkamov, K. Passive thermal control in residential buildings using phase change materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 371–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bastien, D.; Athienitis, A.K. Passive thermal energy storage, part 1: Design concepts and metrics. Renew. Energy 2018, 115, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campaniço, H.; Hollmuller, P.; Soares, P.M.M. Assessing energy savings in cooling demand of buildings using passive cooling systems based on ventilation. Appl. Energy 2014, 134, 426–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benhammou, M.; Draoui, B. Parametric study on thermal performance of earth-to-air heat exchanger used for cooling of buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 44, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spala, A.; Bagiorgas, H.S.; Assimakopoulos, M.N.; Kalavrouziotis, J.; Matthopoulos, D.; Mihalakakou, G. On the green roof system. Selection, state of the art and energy potential investigation of a system installed in an office building in Athens, Greece. Renew. Energy 2008, 33, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulze, T.; Eicker, U. Controlled natural ventilation for energy efficient buildings. Energy Build. 2013, 56, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, W.; Zhang, Q.; Ji, H.; Wang, R.; Zhou, N.; Ye, Q.; Hao, B.; Li, Y.; Luo, D.; Lau, S.S.Y. A review of net zero energy buildings in hot and humid climates: Experience learned from 34 case study buildings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 114, 109303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabeza, L.F.; de Gracia, A.; Pisello, A.L. Integration of renewable technologies in historical and heritage buildings: A review. Energy Build. 2018, 177, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jelle, B.P.; Breivik, C.; Røkenes, H.D.; Jelle, B.P.; Breivik, C.; Røkenes, H.D. Building integrated photovoltaic products: A state-of-the-art review and future research opportunities. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 100, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerón, I.; Caamaño-Martín, E.; Neila, F.J. State-of-the-art’ of building integrated photovoltaic products. Renew. Energy 2013, 58, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belussi, L.; Barozzi, B.; Bellazzi, A.; Danza, L.; Devitofrancesco, A.; Fanciulli, C.; Ghellere, M.; Guazzi, G.; Meroni, I.; Salamone, F.; et al. A review of performance of zero energy buildings and energy efficiency solutions. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 25, 100772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilar, F.J.; Aledo, S.; Quiles, P.V. Experimental study of the solar photovoltaic contribution for the domestic hot water production with heat pumps in dwellings. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 101, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quesada, G.; Rousse, D.; Dutil, Y.; Badache, M.; Hallé, S. A comprehensive review of solar facades. Opaque solar facades. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2820–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charles, R.G.; Davies, M.L.; Douglas, P. Third generation photovoltaics—Early intervention for circular economy and a sustainable future. In 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG); IEEE: Piscatway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khatri, S.; Ip, K.; Picco, M.; Hashemi, A. Potential and impact of incorporating roof photovoltaic to enhance environmental sustainability of historic English churches in the United Kingdom. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 290, 12154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceranic, B.; Latham, D.; Dean, A. Sustainable design and building information modelling: Case study of energy plus house, hieron’s wood, derbyshire UK. Energy Procedia 2015, 83, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Negroponte, N. The architecture machine. Comput. Aided Des. 1970, 7, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X. Performance-based and performance-driven architectural design and optimization. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 2010, 4, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamdy, M.; Hasan, A.; Siren, K. A multi-stage optimization method for cost-optimal and nearly-zero-energy building solutions in line with the EPBD-recast 2010. Energy Build. 2013, 56, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bre, F.; Silva, A.S.; Ghisi, E.; Fachinotti, V.D. Residential building design optimisation using sensitivity analysis and genetic algorithm. Energy Build. 2016, 133, 853–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lützkendorf, T.; Balouktsi, M. Assessing a sustainable urban development: Typology of indicators and sources of information. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2017, 38, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ascione, F.; Bianco, N.; Mauro, G.M.; Vanoli, G.P. A new comprehensive framework for the multi-objective optimization of building energy design: Harlequin. Appl. Energy 2019, 241, 331–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azari, R.; Garshasbi, S.; Amini, P.; Rashed-Ali, H.; Mohammadi, Y. Multi-objective optimization of building envelope design for life cycle environmental performance. Energy Build. 2016, 126, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gossard, D.; Lartigue, B.; Thellier, F. Multi-objective optimization of a building envelope for thermal performance using genetic algorithms and artificial neural network. Energy Build. 2013, 67, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrara, M.; Fabrizio, E.; Virgone, J.; Filippi, M. A simulation-based optimization method for cost-optimal analysis of nearly zero energy buildings. Energy Build. 2014, 84, 442–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdallah, M.; El-Rayes, K.; Clevenger, C. Minimizing energy consumption and carbon emissions of aging buildings. Procedia Eng. 2015, 118, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Mostavi, E.; Asadi, S.; Boussaa, D. Development of a new methodology to optimize building life cycle cost, environmental impacts, and occupant satisfaction. Energy 2017, 121, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schito, E.; Conti, P.; Testi, D. Multi-objective optimization of microclimate in museums for concurrent reduction of energy needs, visitors’ discomfort and artwork preservation risks. Appl. Energy 2018, 224, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.Y.; Cervera, M. Strain localization of elastic-damaging frictional-cohesive materials: Analytical results and numerical verification. Materials 2017, 10, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hay, R.; Ostertag, C.P. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of double-skin façade (DSF) system with fiber-reinforced concrete for sustainable and energy-efficient buildings in the tropics. Build. Environ. 2018, 142, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Najjar, M.; Figueiredo, K.; Hammad, A.W.A.; Haddad, A. Integrated optimization with building information modeling and life cycle assessment for generating energy efficient buildings. Appl. Energy 2019, 250, 1366–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceranic, B. Sustainable design analysis and BIM integration. Archit. Technol. Res. Pract. 2013, 89–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krygiel, E.; Nies, B. Green BIM: Successful Sustainable Design with Building Information Modeling; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
- Gou, S.; Nik, V.M.; Scartezzini, J.L.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Z. Passive design optimization of newly-built residential buildings in Shanghai for improving indoor thermal comfort while reducing building energy demand. Energy Build. 2018, 169, 484–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EnergyPlus. Available online: https://energyplus.net (accessed on 9 December 2019).
- MATLAB®. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com (accessed on 9 December 2019).
- SIMLAB. Available online: https://www.simlab-soft.com (accessed on 9 December 2019).
- Bamdad, K.; Cholette, M.E.; Guan, L.; Bell, J. Building energy optimisation under uncertainty using ACOMV algorithm. Energy Build. 2018, 167, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smarra, F.; Jain, A.; de Rubeis, T.; Ambrosini, D.; D’Innocenzo, A.; Mangharam, R. Data-driven model predictive control using random forests for building energy optimization and climate control. Appl. Energy 2018, 226, 1252–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wen, J. Net-zero energy building clusters emulator for energy planning and operation evaluation. Comput. Environ. Urban. Syst. 2017, 62, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerdan, I.G.; Raslan, R.; Ruyssevelt, P.; Gálvez, D.M. ExRET-Opt: An automated exergy/exergoeconomic simulation framework for building energy retrofit analysis and design optimization. Appl. Energy 2017, 192, 33–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgarm, N.; Sajadi, B.; Delgarm, S. Multi-objective optimization of building energy performance and indoor thermal comfort: A new method using artificial bee colony (ABC). Energy Build. 2016, 131, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Case Study | Country | Goal | Passive System | Active System | Results | Criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amman building stock [27] | Jordan | improve energy efficiency | building envelope optimised by external walls and roof | reduced 72% energy saving on the heating and cooling loads | energy efficiency; architectonic authenticity | |
363 residential buildings in the region of Calabria [28] | Italy | improve energy efficiency | exterior walls improved; window replacement | saved 770,392 tCO2/year | energy efficiency; architectonic authenticity | |
Bernardas’ Convent retrofit, Lisbon [29] | Portugal | improve energy efficiency | attic insulation; window replacement by others with identical design | energy efficiency; architectonic authenticity; change of function | ||
1902 building in Vassar College [18] | USA | improve energy efficiency | refurbish historic wood windows refurbished; storm protection installed | energy efficiency; architectonic authenticity; best economic solution | ||
Zrenjanin brewery [7] | Serbia | improve energy efficiency | inner face of external walls insulation; thermal bridges elimination; new double glazing and external window protection | energy efficiency; architectonic authenticity | ||
Typical 1920s Swedish building [9] | Sweden | reduce CO2 emissions by 20% | package of measures: weather stripping; attic insulation; adding a pane of glass to some of the windows | installation of a heat pump | reduced 20% of CO2 emissions | energy efficiency; architectonic authenticity; reducing CO2 emissions |
reduce 50% of CO2 emissions | package of measures: weather stripping; attic insulation; external wall insulation | installation of a wood-pellet boiler | reduced 50% of CO2 emissions; appearance of the building affected | |||
save 74% of energy, when taking in account life-cycle techno-economic optimisation | attic floor, wall, and crawl space insulation; window replacement | installation of a wood-pellet boiler | saved 74% of energy; risk of mould growth in the attic and crawl space (regular monitoring needed) | |||
Office building located in Carbonia, Sardinia [17] | Italy | improve energy efficiency | package of retrofit actions to reduce the payback time | installation of a PV system | energy efficiency; architectonic authenticity; best economic solution regarding governmental financing incentives |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fernandes, J.; Santos, M.C.; Castro, R. Introductory Review of Energy Efficiency in Buildings Retrofits. Energies 2021, 14, 8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238100
Fernandes J, Santos MC, Castro R. Introductory Review of Energy Efficiency in Buildings Retrofits. Energies. 2021; 14(23):8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238100
Chicago/Turabian StyleFernandes, Joana, Maria Catarina Santos, and Rui Castro. 2021. "Introductory Review of Energy Efficiency in Buildings Retrofits" Energies 14, no. 23: 8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238100
APA StyleFernandes, J., Santos, M. C., & Castro, R. (2021). Introductory Review of Energy Efficiency in Buildings Retrofits. Energies, 14(23), 8100. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238100