# Solar Field Output Temperature Optimization Using a MILP Algorithm and a 0D Model in the Case of a Hybrid Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Plant for SHIP Applications

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Envisaged System and Algorithm Structure

#### 2.1. Concentrated Solar Thermal System under Consideration

#### 2.1.1. Schematic and System Description

#### 2.1.2. Main Hypothesis

- Some thermal and parasitic losses are neglected: heat losses from night’s recirculation to avoid freezing, line pumping power...
- Perfectly mixed hot tank: uniform temperature in the tank.
- Heat losses’ approximation in the SF: they are classically taken as the module’s losses, with the average temperature of the SF.
- Constant fluid properties with temperature.
- Constant boiler efficiency. No limitations on the power (maximal or minimal) are considered.
- No heat losses in the cold tank: no calculations were made on the cold tank, although heat losses do happen in it as well.
- Perfect solar forecast: this hypothesis is chosen in order to exclude the influence of the forecasting model.

#### 2.2. Algorithm Structure

## 3. Physical Model

#### 3.1. 0D Solar Field Model

- Sun position

- Optical efficiency

- Heat losses

^{2}of aperture area, ${T}_{SF,out}$ the outlet temperature of the solar field in °C, ${T}_{SF,in}$ the inlet temperature of the solar field in °C and ${T}_{amb}$ the ambient temperature in °C, and ${a}_{1}$ and ${a}_{4}$ the heat losses correlation coefficients. For the LF-11 Fresnel collector, ${a}_{1}=0.032913\frac{W}{{m}^{2}.K}$ and ${a}_{4}=1.48\ast {10}^{-9}\frac{W}{{m}^{2}.{K}^{4}}$. Those coefficients are taken from a single module and extrapolated to the entire SF, assuming that the temperature evolves linearly in the SF.

- Heat from the solar field

^{2}, ${\eta}_{opt}$ the optical efficiency, and ${\dot{q}}_{losses}$ the heat losses in W/m

^{2}.

- Mass flow rate of the SF from outlet temperature, considering inertia.

- Validation

#### 3.2. Plant Model

#### 3.2.1. Mass and Mass Flow Rates Balance (Storage and Demand)

- Case 1: ${M}_{h+1}>{M}_{max}$. Too much mass flow rate at the inlet, need to defocus. Implementation:$${\dot{m}}_{SF,h}\leftarrow {\dot{m}}_{SF,h}-\frac{{M}_{h+1}-{M}_{max}}{\Delta t}\mathrm{and}{M}_{h+1}\leftarrow {M}_{max}$$
- Case 2: ${M}_{h+1}<0$. Demand was not answered correctly, need to increase the auxiliary mass flow rate. Implementation:$${\dot{m}}_{aux,h}\leftarrow {\dot{m}}_{aux,h}-\frac{{M}_{h+1}}{\Delta t}\mathrm{and}{M}_{h+1}\leftarrow 0$$

#### 3.2.2. Temperature of the Storage

#### 3.2.3. Boiler Model

#### 3.2.4. Plant Metrics

## 4. Control Models

#### 4.1. MILP Algorithm

#### 4.1.1. General Description of MILP Algorithm and Solver

#### 4.1.2. Methodology: How Is the Mathematical Problem Posed

#### 4.1.3. From Algorithm Parameters to MILP Algorithm’s Parameters

**bold**.

**t**is the time set; hourly resolution is chosen, with a time horizon of 48 h.

- Temperature range discretization:

- Absorbed heat from the sun, from Equation (3):

- Mass flow rate calculation:

#### 4.1.4. From MILP Parameters to MILP Formulation

#### 4.2. Control Models for Comparison

#### 4.2.1. Control Approach 1 (CA1)

#### 4.2.2. Control Approach 2 (CA2)

## 5. Case study and Results

#### 5.1. Case Study

#### 5.2. Hourly Results

#### 5.3. Yearly Results

## 6. Sensitivity Analysis

#### 6.1. Methodology

- -
- the number of modules in one loop is determined with the nominal mass flow rate of the module, the inlet and outlet temperature at design, under a condition of 900 W/m
^{2}:

- -
- the number of loops in parallel is determined with the solar field area necessary to answer the need with the available DNI on a user-chosen clear-sky day, the design efficiency, and the solar multiple:

- -
- the size of the storage is calculated from the number of storage hours and the average mass flow rate demand in kg/h:

#### 6.2. Process Temperature

#### 6.3. Heat Losses

#### 6.4. Other Sensibility Analyses

## 7. Discussion and Perspectives

## 8. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

Nomenclature | |

$A$ | Area (m^{2}) |

${a}_{1},{a}_{4}$ | $\mathrm{Heat}\mathrm{losses}\mathrm{coefficient}(\mathrm{W}/{\mathrm{m}}^{2}\xb7\mathrm{K},\mathrm{W}/{\mathrm{m}}^{2}\xb7{\mathrm{K}}^{4}$) |

${C}_{p}$ | Specific heat capacity at constant pressure (J/kg·°C) |

$DNI$ | Direct Normal Irradiation (W/m^{2}) |

$h$ | Specific enthalpy (J/kg) |

IAM | Incidence Angle Modifier (-) |

${I}_{t}$ | Inertia of the fluid (J/K) |

$M$ | Mass (kg) |

$\dot{m}$ | Mass flow rate (kg/s) |

$N$ | Integer number (-) |

$Q$ | Heat (J or Wh) |

$\dot{q}$ | Heat flux (W) |

$S{F}_{a}$ | Solar Fraction (-) |

$SM$ | Solar Multiple (-) |

$\overrightarrow{s}$ | Solar vector |

$T$ | Temperature (°C) |

UA | Heat losses of the storage (W/K) |

Greek Symbols | |

$\alpha $ | Azimuth of the sun (0° North, 90° East) |

$\eta $ | Efficiency |

$\gamma $ | Elevation of the sun (0° Horizon, 90° Zenith) |

$\theta $ | Incidence angle on collector |

$\varphi $ | Latitude |

Subscripts | |

abs | Absorbed |

amb | Ambient |

aux | Auxiliary |

boiler | Boiler |

h | Hour h |

in | Inlet of the solar field |

L | Longitudinal |

opt | Optical |

out | Outlet of the solar field |

SF | Solar Field |

St | Storage |

T | Transversal |

$x\to y$ | Flow from component x to component y |

## References

- Kumar, L.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Rahim, N.A. Global Advancement of Solar Thermal Energy Technologies for Industrial Process Heat and Its Future Prospects: A Review. Energy Convers. Manag.
**2019**, 195, 885–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Schoeneberger, C.A.; McMillan, C.A.; Kurup, P.; Akar, S.; Margolis, R.; Masanet, E. Solar for Industrial Process Heat: A Review of Technologies, Analysis Approaches, and Potential Applications in the United States. Energy
**2020**, 206, 118083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pietruschka, D.; Fedrizzi, R.; Orioli, F.; Söll, R.; Stauss, R. Demonstration of Three Large Scale Solar Process Heat Applications with Different Solar Thermal Collector Technologies. Energy Procedia
**2012**, 30, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - IEA. IEA Task 49/IV Database for Applications of Solar Heat Integration in Industrial Processes; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Wallerand, A.S.; Selviaridis, A.; Ashouri, A.; Maréchal, F. Targeting Optimal Design and Operation of Solar Heated Industrial Processes: A MILP Formulation. Energy Procedia
**2016**, 91, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Omu, A.; Hsieh, S.; Orehounig, K. Mixed Integer Linear Programming for the Design of Solar Thermal Energy Systems with Short-Term Storage. Appl. Energy
**2016**, 180, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tilahun, F.B.; Bhandari, R.; Mamo, M. Design Optimization and Control Approach for a Solar-Augmented Industrial Heating. Energy
**2019**, 179, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fitsum, B.T.; Ramchandra, B.; Menegesha, M. Design Optimization and Demand Side Management of a Solar-Assisted Industrial Heating Using Agent-Based Modelling (ABM): Methodology and Case Study. E3S Web Conf.
**2018**, 64, 02001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ghazouani, M.; Bouya, M.; Benaissa, M. Thermo-Economic and Exergy Analysis and Optimization of Small PTC Collectors for Solar Heat Integration in Industrial Processes. Renew. Energy
**2020**, 152, 984–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wagner, M.J.; Hamilton, W.T.; Newman, A.; Dent, J.; Diep, C.; Braun, R. Optimizing Dispatch for a Concentrated Solar Power Tower. Solar Energy
**2018**, 174, 1198–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vasallo, M.J.; Bravo, J.M. A Novel Two-Model Based Approach for Optimal Scheduling in CSP Plants. Solar Energy
**2016**, 126, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - He, G.; Chen, Q.; Kang, C.; Xia, Q. Optimal Offering Strategy for Concentrating Solar Power Plants in Joint Energy, Reserve and Regulation Markets. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy
**2016**, 7, 1245–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Petrollese, M.; Cocco, D.; Cau, G.; Cogliani, E. Comparison of Three Different Approaches for the Optimization of the CSP Plant Scheduling. Solar Energy
**2017**, 150, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dowling, A.W.; Zheng, T.; Zavala, V.M. A Decomposition Algorithm for Simultaneous Scheduling and Control of CSP Systems. AIChE J.
**2018**, 64, 2408–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pousinho, H.M.I.; Contreras, J.; Pinson, P.; Mendes, V.M.F. Robust Optimisation for Self-Scheduling and Bidding Strategies of Hybrid CSP–Fossil Power Plants. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
**2015**, 67, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pousinho, H.M.I.; Silva, H.; Mendes, V.M.F.; Collares-Pereira, M.; Pereira Cabrita, C. Self-Scheduling for Energy and Spinning Reserve of Wind/CSP Plants by a MILP Approach. Energy
**2014**, 78, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Yang, Y.; Guo, S.; Liu, D.; Li, R.; Chu, Y. Operation Optimization Strategy for Wind-Concentrated Solar Power Hybrid Power Generation System. Energy Convers. Manag.
**2018**, 160, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhao, S.; Fang, Y.; Wei, Z. Stochastic Optimal Dispatch of Integrating Concentrating Solar Power Plants with Wind Farms. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.
**2019**, 109, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hamilton, W.T.; Husted, M.A.; Newman, A.M.; Braun, R.J.; Wagner, M.J. Dispatch Optimization of Concentrating Solar Power with Utility-Scale Photovoltaics. Optim. Eng.
**2020**, 21, 335–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rashid, K.; Safdarnejad, S.M.; Powell, K.M. Process Intensification of Solar Thermal Power Using Hybridization, Flexible Heat Integration, and Real-Time Optimization. Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif.
**2019**, 139, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ellingwood, K.; Mohammadi, K.; Powell, K. A Novel Means to Flexibly Operate a Hybrid Concentrated Solar Power Plant and Improve Operation during Non-Ideal Direct Normal Irradiation Conditions. Energy Convers. Manag.
**2020**, 203, 112275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wirtz, M. Temperature Control in 5th Generation District Heating and Cooling Networks: An MILP-Based Operation Optimization. Appl. Energy
**2021**, 288, 116608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Industrial Solar LF-11. Available online: https://www.industrial-solar.de/technologies/fresnel-collector/ (accessed on 16 June 2021).
- Blanco-Muriel, M.; Alarcón-Padilla, D.C.; López-Moratalla, T.; Lara-Coira, M. Computing the Solar Vector. Solar Energy
**2001**, 70, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Morin, G.; Dersch, J.; Platzer, W.; Eck, M.; Häberle, A. Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector Power Plants. Solar Energy
**2012**, 86, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wagner, M.J.; Gilman, P. Technical Manual for the SAM Physical Trough Model; NREL/TP-5500-51825; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2011; p. 1016437. [Google Scholar]
- System Advisor Model Version 2020.11.29 (SAM 2020.11.29). National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA. Available online: https://sam.nrel.gov/ (accessed on 16 June 2021).
- Rao, S.S. Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-470-18352-6. [Google Scholar]
- Coin-OR Coin-OR CBC MIP Solver; Johnjforrest, S.; Vigerske, H.G.; Santos, T.; Ralphs, L.; Hafer, B.; Kristjansson; Jpfasano; EdwinStraver; Lubin, M.; et al. Coin-or/Cbc: Version 2.10.5. Available online: https://github.com/coin-or/Cbc (accessed on 16 June 2021).
- EU SCIENCE HUB. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS); EU SCIENCE HUB: Ispra, Italy, 2019; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/pvgis (accessed on 16 June 2021).
- Kamerling, S.; Vuillerme, V.; Rodat, S. Data for Solar Field Output Temperature Optimization Using a MILP Algorithm and a 0D Model in the Case of a Hybrid Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Plant for SHIP Applications. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5006230 (accessed on 16 June 2021).

**Figure 4.**Heat losses in W/m

^{2}of collector aperture area as a function of the outlet temperature of the LF-11 Fresnel collector, with an inlet temperature of 50 °C and ambient temperature of 15 °C.

**Figure 5.**Heat balance over a node. Taken from Wagner et al. [26].

**Figure 11.**Evolution of Solar Fraction as a function of process temperature for the 4 demand curves and 3 control strategies.

**Figure 12.**Annual solar fraction as a function of heat losses’ coefficient

**a**

_{1}(Equation (2)) for the 4 demand curves and 3 control strategies.

Variable | Value (Unit) | Description |
---|---|---|

$\varphi $ | 41.117° | Latitude |

${Q}_{daily}$ | 451 MWh/day | Daily heat demand |

${T}_{process}$ | 350 °C | Process temperature |

${T}_{return}$ | 50 °C | Return temperature |

${\eta}_{design}$ | 0.6 | Design efficiency (defined in Section 4.1) |

SM | 1.5 | Solar Multiple (defined in Section 4.1) |

${A}_{SF}$ | 113,367 m^{2} | Solar field area |

${N}_{Module}$ | 31 | Number of modules in one loop |

${N}_{loop}$ | 159 | Number of loops |

$\Delta {t}_{storage}$ | 8 h | Storage hours |

${M}_{max}$ | 864 t | Tank capacity |

$UA$ | 570 W/K | Heat losses of the storage |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Kamerling, S.; Vuillerme, V.; Rodat, S. Solar Field Output Temperature Optimization Using a MILP Algorithm and a 0D Model in the Case of a Hybrid Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Plant for SHIP Applications. *Energies* **2021**, *14*, 3731.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133731

**AMA Style**

Kamerling S, Vuillerme V, Rodat S. Solar Field Output Temperature Optimization Using a MILP Algorithm and a 0D Model in the Case of a Hybrid Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Plant for SHIP Applications. *Energies*. 2021; 14(13):3731.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133731

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Kamerling, Simon, Valéry Vuillerme, and Sylvain Rodat. 2021. "Solar Field Output Temperature Optimization Using a MILP Algorithm and a 0D Model in the Case of a Hybrid Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Plant for SHIP Applications" *Energies* 14, no. 13: 3731.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133731