Next Article in Journal
Influence of Debris on Water Intake Gratings in Small Hydroelectric Plants: An Experimental Study on Hydraulic Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Valve Plate Structural Optimal Design and Flow Field Analysis for the Aviation Bidirectional Three-Port Piston Pump
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Thermal Decomposition of Wood and Wood-Based Materials on the State of the Atmospheric Air. Emissions of Toxic Compounds and Greenhouse Gases

by
Przemysław Rybiński
1,*,
Bartłomiej Syrek
1,
Mirosław Szwed
2,
Dariusz Bradło
3,
Witold Żukowski
3,
Anna Marzec
4 and
Magdalena Śliwka-Kaszyńska
5
1
Institute of Chemistry, The Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland
2
Institute of Geography and Environmental Sciences, The Jan Kochanowski University, Uniwersytecka 7, 25-406 Kielce, Poland
3
Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland
4
Faculty of Chemistry, Institute of Polymer and Dye Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego 12/16, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
5
Department of Organic Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(11), 3247; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113247
Submission received: 19 April 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 31 May 2021 / Published: 2 June 2021

Abstract

:
This paper presents the energy characteristics of wood and wood-based materials in the form of commercially available pellets, furniture board (MDF) and OSB. Toxicometric indices were determined for gaseous destructs arising from thermal decomposition and combustion of the materials studied. The paper proves that combustion conditions are crucial in terms of toxic destructive emissions. It has been shown that the combustion of wood-based materials under controlled conditions can lead to equally low emissions of toxic wastes as the combustion of traditional wood materials. The paper also presents the index of greenhouse gas emission, the so-called CO2 equivalent, for the examined wood and wood-based materials.

1. Introduction

Recently, the problem of air pollution, commonly called “smog”, in the face of enormous health, social and economic costs has become an absolute priority. Numerous studies conducted in many parts of the world indicate that there is a link between exposure to air pollution and the occurrence of various adverse health effects. Particularly vulnerable groups are children, people with existing cardiovascular and respiratory disease, diabetes, obesity and the elderly. It has now been proven that exposure to air pollution is associated with increased mortality and reduced life expectancy [1,2,3,4].
Particularly important, from the point of view of protection of human health and life, is particulate matter, whose particles have an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers. In addition to the size of the dust particles, the effects of dust pollution on human health may also depend on its chemical composition. Dust from combustion processes may include various substances harmful to health, e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives, azaarenes and other polycyclic aromatic compounds, compounds from the dioxin group (PCDD/F), as well as heavy and transition metals and their compounds [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Gaseous pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and tropospheric ozone, which is formed by nitrogen dioxide in photochemical reactions, also have a harmful effect on health. Reactions between gaseous substances (ammonia, sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides) may also result in the formation of so-called secondary dusts, and the chemical composition of primary dusts may be modified.
Studies conducted in many parts of the world clearly show the relationship between ambient air pollution and cancer incidence. Cohort studies performed to date, carried out in groups of several hundred thousand people followed for several years, show a clear, statistically significant relationship between exposure to dust pollutants and nitrogen oxides and lung cancer incidence and mortality [6,7].
Elevated nitric oxide exposure has been shown to be associated with a higher risk of brain tumors and cervical cancer in adults [8]. Furthermore, exposure of pregnant mothers to nitric oxides is associated with a higher risk of cancer in their children in early childhood [9]. Strong carcinogenic effects are also demonstrated by compounds from the PAH group, as well as some compounds from the PCDD/F group.
It should also be clearly emphasized that the available analytical results clearly indicate an increased risk of death or hospitalization for stroke as a result of increased exposure to air pollutants such as: CO, SO2, NO2, O3 and PM and that a short-term increase in PM2.5 concentrations of 10 µg/m3 translates into an 11% increase in the risk of death from stroke [10]. Long-term exposure to pollutants, such as those found in the most polluted cities, has a cumulative effect on adverse cardiovascular health effects, including an increase in the frequency of myocardial infarctions.
Poland is at the forefront of the Member States of the European Union in terms of air pollution with PM2.5 [11].
Using risk factors for long-term exposure recommended by WHO, it can be estimated that over 44 thousand people die in Poland annually due to air polluted with PM2.5 (data for 2012). In comparison with other European countries, the influence of air pollution on the occurrence of cancer, including lung cancer, is particularly strongly accentuated in the case of Poland, where typical long-term exposures to PM2.5 are 20–30 µg/m3, and in the most polluted places of southern Poland even over 40 µg/m3. Thus, in localities with the highest concentrations of dust pollutants, the risk of lung cancer associated with exposure to such pollutants may be even 20–40% higher than in areas with very low pollutant concentrations [4].
The studies carried out indicate that particulate matter in Poland contains a dozen or even several dozen times more carcinogenic compounds from the group of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, including derivatives of PAH, such as nitro-WPAH, as well as compounds from the dioxin group, as compared to Western European countries. Many of these compounds are more carcinogenic than benzo[a]pyrene, whose carcinogenic and mutagenic nature is well understood. Converting the amount of benzo[a]pyrene inhaled into the air to the equivalent number of cigarettes that an adult of average physical activity would have to smoke to supply the same amount of this substance to the body, is appealing to the imagination. Depending on the locality and the year considered, this equivalent can range from a few hundred to even three thousand cigarettes per year [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].
There are many reasons for the poor or very poor quality of air in cities, but one of the most important reasons for the condition of air in Poland, especially in large urban agglomerations, is undoubtedly the combustion of high-energy municipal waste in domestic furnaces, which includes glued boards (OSB), furniture boards, varnished furniture, etc. Incineration of such waste is a source of emission of many harmful substances, including highly toxic compounds such as hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen chloride, nitrogen oxides, hydrogen sulfide and sulfur oxides as well as carcinogenic substances such as aromatic hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated biphenyls and PCDD/F compounds [25,26].
In this paper, toxicometric indices of gaseous products of thermal decomposition and combustion of wood-based materials have been determined. Furniture board (MDF), OSB and commercially available pellets were used for testing. Determined values of toxicometric indices allowed to estimate the influence of uncontrolled combustion of such materials (household furnaces) on the state of atmospheric air. Beech wood was used as reference material.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Methodology

Materials

Commercially available pellets from Stelmet (Poland) as well as OSB from SWISS KRONO (Poland) and MDF from EGGER Biskupiec (Poland) board waste were used for the tests. Beech wood was used as reference material. Prior to testing, all materials were ground to obtain samples that were homogeneous in terms of physicochemical properties. For toxicity testing, pellets were prepared from the crushed samples.

2.2. Methodology

Thermal analysis: The thermal properties of the tested materials were examined in the air atmosphere, in the temperature range of 25–700 °C, using a Jupiter STA 449 F3 thermal analyzer from Netzsch.
Flammability: Flammability tests were performed with the use of PCFC calorimeter (pyrolysis combustion flow calorimeter). Parameters such as: maximum heat emission rate (HRRmax), total heat emitted (HR) and heat capacity (HC) were recorded during test. During measurement, gaseous products from thermal decomposition sample were transferred from the pyrolysis chamber to the tubular furnace, where after mixing with oxygen, were completely burned. The temperature of the pyrolyzer was 750 °C, while that of combustor 900 °C [12].
Toxicity: Toxicity: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of toxic gaseous products were performed with the use of fluidized bed reactor. Air was used as a fluidized gas, and aluminosilicate microspheres as a fluidized bed. The analysis was carried out at five temperatures: 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C. The mass of the studied sample was selected experimentally. A sample by mass from 0.015–0.114 g was placed in the reactor after which the concentration of evolved gases was analyzed. The presented below results are the arithmetic means obtained from four samples of a given type of tested material.
Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained with the use of the Gasmet DX-400 (FTIR spectrum of exhaust gases), Horiba PG250 analyzer (for measurement of the CO, CO2 and SO2 concentration the NDIR detectors were used, the sum of NOx were detected and analyzed with the use of chemiluminescence method, whereas the O2 volume fraction was measured by the electrochemical detector (Figure 1).
Method of quantitative and qualitative analysis of toxic gaseous products, in detail was described in previous authors publication [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31].

3. Results

3.1. Thermal Analysis of Wood and Wood-Based Materials

The first stage of thermal decomposition of beech wood takes place in the temperature range of ΔT = 50–110 °C. This decomposition is accompanied by an endothermic transition, registered on the DSC curve, associated with the evaporation of water physically bound to the biomass. The intense exothermic decomposition of the sample takes place in the temperature range of ΔT = 210–400 °C. A maximum decomposition rate of 16.36%/min is recorded at TRMAX 330 °C. The residue after thermal decomposition is burned in the range of ΔT = 410–460 °C. The residue after combustion at T = 600 °C is only 1.78% of the initial sample weight (Figure 2, Table 1).
The thermal transformations associated with the decomposition of pellets, OSB and MDF are not significantly different from the thermal transformations recorded for beech wood. On the other hand, clear differences can be observed in the thermal decomposition of OSB as well as MDF in relation to the reference material (beech wood) (Figure 3, Table 1). A significant reduction in the thermal decomposition rate parameter was recorded for both OSB and MDF. In the case of OSB, the value of the dm/dt parameter was reduced by 27.9%, while in the case of MDF, it was reduced by 28.6% compared to beech wood. The reduction of dm/dt parameter unambiguously indicates the reduction of the amount of gaseous destructs entering the flame, which can be a consequence of cyclization reactions, especially carbonization occurring in the boundary layer between the flame and the sample. The cyclization and charring reactions are also indicated by an increase of nearly 174% in the residue after thermal decomposition of OSB relative to beech wood and by more than 200% relative to pellets. The thermal decomposition residue of MDF is 138% greater than that of beech wood and over 160% greater than that of pellets [30].
It should also be noted that in the case of both OSB and MDF, the combustion of residues after thermal decomposition occurs in a much wider temperature range than in the case of beech wood and pellets, which may indicate an intensification of cyclization and carbonization processes (Figure 3).

3.2. Flammability of Tested Wood and Wood-Based Materials

The results obtained using PCFC (pyrolysis combustion flow calorimeter) clearly show that the pellets studied exhibit higher combustibility (HRRMAX and THR parameters) and calorific value (heat capacity, HRC parameter) than the reference material in the form of beech wood. For OSB, the HRRmax parameter was reduced by 27%, while the THR parameter was reduced by 14.5% compared to beech wood. MDF is also less flammable than both beechwood and pellets (Table 2).
The reduction in flammability of both OSB and MDF in relation to the reference material (beech wood) results directly from their chemical composition. In the production process of both OSB and MDF, urea-formaldehyde and melamine-urea-formaldehyde resins are used. In the case of OSB, the middle layer consists of mainly pine chips bonded with polyurethane glue. The melamine-urea-phenol-formaldehyde resins are used for bonding the outer layers of OSB [32]. The presence of synthetic adhesives in the composition of OSB and MDF directly results in lowering their flammability in relation to beech wood (parameter HRRMAX, THR, but also dm/dt). The reduction in flammability results directly from the intensification of cyclization and charring reactions under the influence of synthetic adhesives.

3.3. Toxicity of Gaseous Products of Thermal Decomposition and Combustion of Wood and Wood-Based Materials

At present, four types of tests are used to test the toxicity of gaseous products of thermal decomposition and combustion: analytical, biological, biological-analytical and computational-analytical. Due to the cost of experiments, biological and biological-analytical tests are rarely used, while computational-analytical methods are gaining importance. In the calculation and analytical tests to assess toxicity of gaseous destructs, data are used in relation to the thermal decomposition process, i.e., the amount of thermal exposure (heat flux), volume of the volatile phase formed as a result of thermal decomposition and combustion of the sample, qualitative and quantitative composition of the volatile phase, assumed time of human exposure to a given toxin, maximum permissible concentration of individual components of the volatile phase, including e.g., the limiting concentration of a given product of thermal decomposition, causing death of 50% of the population with a 30-minute exposure. As a result of the obtained data, the so-called toxicological profile is developed, which is the basis for estimating the toxicity of gases formed during the thermal decomposition of the tested material.
The effect of poisonous substances on living organisms depends on many factors, such as: the type of toxic substance, the route of penetration of the toxin into the body, the dose, the physical and chemical properties of poisons, as well as the transformations they undergo in the body and the susceptibility of the body to poisoning [27,28].
In Poland, toxicity testing of gas destructs is carried out based on the methodology described in the PN-88/B-02855 standard.
The principle of the method is the quantitative, chemical, selective determination of toxic gases that are primarily responsible for fatal accidents. The test enables determination of CO, CO2, HCl, NOx, HCN, SO2, depending on the chemical composition of the tested material. Toxic effects of gases forming toxicological profile according to PN-88/B-02855 methodology are well known.
For example: Carbon monoxide (CO) combines with hemoglobin to form carboxyhemoglobin, causing oxygen deficiency in the body. The concentration of CO at the level of 6000–8000 ppm in the air already after about five minutes causes significant changes in human body, as a result of which it loses its ability to function efficiently. Concentrations of about 12,000–16,000 ppm cause death after five minutes.
By irritating the airways, carbon dioxide (CO2) causes increased breathing, which increases the risk of absorbing other dangerous substances. In low concentrations, it does not exhibit toxic properties, but at concentrations higher than 5000 ppm, its harmful effects on the body are clearly visible.
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Concentrations less than 1.5 ppm generally do not cause any symptoms. Depending on the time of exposure, higher concentrations of NO2 cause respiratory distress leading to hypoxia, lung damage and death.
Hydrogen chloride (HCl). It is characterized by a pungent, suffocating aroma. Irritating to mucous membranes and respiratory system. The hazardous concentration is 140 mg/m3.
Hydrogen cyanide (HCN). It paralyzes the respiratory system at the first moment of contact, causing tissue respiration to be impaired. A concentration of 120–200 ppm causes incapacitation after about five minutes, while 250–400 ppm causes death.
In the method according to the PN-88/B-02855 standard, the results are given in specific emission units (E (g/g) mass of a given product arising from a unit mass of the initial sample under given test conditions). By combining the emission results with the limit concentrations, the toxicometric indices WLC50, WLC50M and WLC50SM are obtained.
The toxicometric index WLC50 is defined as the mass of a given material whose decomposition or combustion under the test conditions produces limiting concentrations of toxic gaseous destruction.
W LC 50 , i = LC 50 , i E i
1 W LC 50 M = i = 1 n 1 W LC 50 , i
The WLC50SM toxicometric index is defined as the arithmetic mean of the WLC50 indices from individual temperatures, e.g., (400, 500, 600, 700, 800 °C). This index is used to classify the toxicity of materials (Table 3).
Table 4 shows the emissions of gaseous destructs at T = 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C from the decomposition of beech wood, pellets, OSB and furniture board (MDF). (Mean and standard deviations based on four replicates).
From the results of the analyses in Table 4, it is clear that the highest emission values are recorded, irrespective of the decomposition temperature and type of sample, for carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. It should be noted that OSB as well as MDF have noticeably higher carbon dioxide emissions, especially at T = 400, 500, 600 and 700 °C than beech wood or pellets.
Undoubtedly, the emission of NO2 as well as HCN influences the value of toxicometric index for both OSB and MDF. It should be clearly noted that both NO2 and HCN are emitted in the temperature range of 500–600 °C, which is in the range of combustion of thermal decomposition residues of both OSB and MDF (Table 1). The range of decomposition temperature values clearly indicates that the emission of volatile nitrogen compounds is related to the thermal decomposition of the binder used in the production of OSB and MDF [29,30].
In the production process of both OSB and MDF, urea-formaldehyde and melamine-urea-formaldehyde resins are used, which are a potential source of NOx, HCN and toxic formaldehyde. Additionally, polyurethane adhesives, used for bonding the middle layer of OSB, which are a precursor of toxic HCN, and melamine-urea-phenol-formaldehyde resins used for bonding the outer layers of OSB, which are a source of NOx and HCN emissions [32].
The data in Table 5 clearly show that the volume of gases formed during the thermal decomposition of OSB and MDF at 400, 500 and 600 °C is much larger than that of beech wood and pellets. For example, in the temperature range of 500 °C, the volume of emitted gases during OSB decomposition is 22.5% higher than for beech wood and 21% higher than for pellets. For MDF, the volume of emitted gases at T = 500 °C is as much as 32% higher than for beech wood, and 30% higher than for pellets.
On the basis of the results presented in Table 5 concerning the volume of the gaseous wastes emitted (CO2, CO, NO2, SO2, HCl, HCN), taking into account similar values of CO2 and CO emissions for all the materials studied, especially in the temperature range T = 500 and 600 °C, it should be stated that the increase in the volume of the gases emitted during the decomposition of OSB and MDF in comparison with beech wood and pellets is mainly due to the formation of nitrogen oxides and hydrogen cyanide.
Taking into account the experimentally determined LC 30 50 values (Table 6), toxicometric indices WLC50 and WLC50SM were calculated, depicting the toxicity level of gaseous destructs emitted during thermal decomposition of the studied materials (Table 7) [15,16,17].
On the basis of the WLC50SM index value, gaseous destructs formed during the decomposition of beech wood, pellets, as well as OSB and MDF board should be considered toxic. However, the analysis of the WLC50M index values, especially in the temperature range T = 500 and 600 °C, indicates significant differences in the toxicity of the gaseous destructs formed from the decomposition of the materials studied.
The WLC50M value for beech wood at T = 500 and 600 °C is 14.78 and 10.82, respectively. For pellets 12.35 and 10.45, for OSB 9.48 and 8.73, and for MDF 7.82 and 8.71. It should be clearly emphasized that the higher the value of toxicometric index, the lower the toxicity of gas destructs. In the temperature range T = 500 °C, the WLC50M index for OSB is 35% lower than for beech wood, in the case of MDF, the WLC50M value at T = 500 °C is as much as 47% lower than for beech wood. In the range T = 600 °C, the valuWLC50M both for OSB and MDF is 19% lower compared to beech wood. The values of determined toxicometric indices clearly indicate higher toxicity of gas destructs originating from the decomposition of OSB and MDF, compared to the toxicity of gas destructs originating from the decomposition of the reference material in the form of beech wood. It should also be clearly stated that commercially available pellets do not generate gaseous destructs with significantly higher toxicity than beech wood. The higher toxicity of gaseous products of thermal decomposition of both OSB and MDF results from the use of polymeric glues based on formaldehyde, urethane or melamine for board production.
As shown above, the toxicometric index WLC50M is the harmonic mean of the WLC50 indices calculated on the basis of the LC value 30 50 i.e., the limiting concentration of a given thermal decomposition product causing death of 50% of the test animal population at 30 min exposure.
In view of the lack of LC 30 50 values for each toxic substance detected with the use of the research methodology applied in this study, in order to more precisely estimate the level of toxicity of gas destructs formed during the decomposition of the tested materials, the universal toxicometric indicator TLV®-TWA was used, i.e., the highest permissible concentration during an 8-hour exposure at the workplace, which does not adversely affect the health of a given employee and the health of his future generations (Threshold Limit Values in order of 8-hour time weighted averages) [18].
The average toxicometric index is defined as:
W mean = n W
W = E TLV TWA
According to the methodology used to implement the study, the Wmean index in addition to gas destructs such as: CO2, CO, NO2, SO2, HCl, HCN, it also includes nitric oxide NO and nitrous oxide N2O, water vapor H2O, hydrocarbons (methane, ethane, ethylene, acetylene), as well as: aldehydes and ketones (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, acetone) and carboxylic acids (formic acid, acetic acid).
Based on the data in Table 8, it was unexpectedly found that the gaseous destructs from burning OSB as well as furniture board were less toxic compared to the destructs from burning beech wood and pellets.
The research results presented in Table 8 and Figure 4 may lead to erroneous conclusions that domestic combustion of OSB and MDF is less harmful to the environment than traditional fuels such as beech wood or pellets. However, it should be clearly emphasized that the testing conditions in the laboratory are significantly different from those in domestic furnaces. In the adopted testing methodology, the fuel sample is given in a small amount in relation to the mass of the bed (0.1 g/200 g). Moreover, the amount of air in the reaction zone is in considerable excess, so that the amount of oxygen is not a limiting factor for the thermal transformation process. The large bed volume relative to the sample also allows the temperature to remain constant regardless of the heat released from the test sample.
Combustion in domestic furnaces is not subject to such controls, in particular with regard to maintaining a minimum temperature and the necessary amount of oxygen. Thus, under uncontrolled conditions of excess fuel relative to the oxidizer, numerous compounds can be formed that are rapidly released from the high temperature zone and do not degrade further, with particulate matter emitted as particulate matter (PM) being particularly hazardous.
The analysis showed that combustion conditions are crucial in terms of toxic emissions. Despite the unquestionable harmfulness of wood-based materials, their combustion under controlled conditions leads to equally low emissions of toxic waste as the combustion of traditional wood materials [19,20,21,22].
From the environmental point of view, an important issue is also the amount of greenhouse gases emitted as a result of thermal decomposition and combustion of the tested materials. For this purpose, the emission index of greenhouse gases emitted during thermal decomposition and combustion of the sample, the so-called CO2 equivalent, was calculated (Figure 5). CO2 equivalent is the sum of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane emissions per gram of sample mass.
From the data in Figure 4, it is clear that during thermal decomposition and combustion of beech wood and pellets, regardless of the temperature range, greenhouse gas emissions are significantly lower than for OSB or MDF. It should also be made clear that in the case of OSB and MDF, nitrous oxide, a gas with a significant impact on global warming, persisting in the atmosphere for an average of 120 years, has a very large share of CO2 equivalent. Undoubtedly, N2O emission is related to the presence of polymer adhesives used as binders in the production process of both OSB and MDF board.

4. Conclusions

Individual heating of single-family homes is the primary source of air pollution in larger communities. An increased concentration of gases and dusts from low emissions in certain meteorological conditions causes an exceedance of acceptable air quality standards and a threat to human health. The study showed that beech wood, pellets and waste OSB and MDF board fragments used for heating in domestic stoves have diversified toxicometric characteristics.
It was shown that the volume of gases formed during the thermal decomposition of OSB and MDF is much larger than that of beech wood and pellets. The increase in the volume of gases emitted during the decomposition of OSB and MDF in comparison with beech wood and pellets is primarily related to the formation of nitrogen oxides and hydrogen cyanide.
Higher toxicity of gaseous products of thermal decomposition of both OSB and MDF board in comparison to pellet or beech wood results from the use of polymeric glues based on formaldehyde, urethane or melamine for their production.
The results of the conducted research also indicate that the combustion conditions are of key importance for the emission of toxic wastes. Despite the unquestionable harmfulness of wood-based materials (MDF, OSB), their combustion in controlled conditions may lead to equally low emissions of toxic wastes as the combustion of traditional wood materials.
Furthermore, it has been shown that during thermal decomposition and combustion of beech wood and pellets, regardless of the temperature range, greenhouse gas emissions are significantly lower than for OSB or MDF. It should also be made clear that in the case of OSB and MDF, nitrous oxide, a gas with a significant impact on global warming, persisting in the atmosphere for an average of 120 years, has a very large share of CO2 equivalent. Undoubtedly, N2O emission is related to the presence of polymer adhesives used as binders in the production process of both OSB and MDF board.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R.; methodology P.R., B.S., M.S., D.B., W.Ż., formal analysis P.R., D.B., W.Ż., A.M., M.Ś.-K., investigation, P.R., B.S., M.S., D.B., W.Ż., A.M., M.Ś.-K., resources P.R., data curation P.R., D.B., writing orginal draft, P.R., B.S., M.S., D.B., W.Ż., A.M., M.Ś.-K., writing—review and editing P.R., B.S., M.S., D.B., W.Ż., A.M., M.Ś.-K., supervision P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research received no external founding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

T5: T50temperature 5 and 50% sample weight loss
TRMAXtemperature of maximum rate of sample decomposition
dm/dtrate of sample decomposition
ΔTsrange of combustion temperature of the residue after thermal decomposition of the sample
P600residue after thermal degradation at T = 600 °C
HRRMAXmaximum heat release rate
THRRMAXtemperature of maximum heat release rate
THRtotal heat release
HRCheat capacity
WLC50 toxicometric index for a single component according to the PN-88/B-02855 standard
WLC50Mtoxicometric index for number components according to the PN-88/B-02855 standard
WLC50SMmean toxicometric index according to the PN-88/B-02855 standard
LC50,ithe limiting concentration of the given i-th thermal degradation product causing death of 50% of the test animal population at 30 min exposure, g/m3
Eispecific emission, gi/g
nnumber of toxic components
Wtoxicometric index defined as the standardized volume of gases (m3) emitted from the thermal decomposition or combustion of 1 mg of sample, m3/mg
Wmeanaverage toxicometric index, m3/mg
TLV-TWAthreshold concentrations of selected gaseous effluents, mg/m3

References

  1. Pope, C.A., III; Dockery, D.W. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J. Air Waste Manag. 2006, 56, 709–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kampa, M.; Castanas, E. Human health effects of air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kelly, F.J.; Fussell, J.C. Air pollution and airway disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1059–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jędrak, J.; Konduracka, E.; Badyda, A.J.; Dąbrowiecki, P. Wpływ Zanieczyszczeń Powietrza na Zdrowie, 1st ed.; Krakowski Alarm Smogowy: Kraków, Poland, 2017; pp. 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grochowalski, A.; Konieczyński, J. PCDDs/PCDFs dl-PCBs and HCB in the flue gas from coal fired CFB boilers. Chemosphere 2008, 73, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamra, G.B.; Guha, N.; Cohen, A.; Laden, F.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Samet, J.M.; Vineis, P.; Forastiere, F.; Saldiva, P.; Yorifuji, T.; et al. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, F.; Jackson, H.; Bina, W.F. Lung adenocarcinoma incidence rates and their relation to motor vehicle density. Cancer Epidem. Biomar. 2009, 18, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Andersen, Z.J.; Hvidberg, M.; Jensen, S.S.; Ketzel, M.; Sorensen, M.; Hansen, J.; Loft, S.; Overvaol, K.; Tjonneland, A. Air pollution from traffic and cancer incidence: A Danish cohort study. Environ. Health 2011, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ghost, J.K.C.; Heck, J.E.; Cockburn, M.; Su, J.; Jerrett, M.; Ritz, B. Prenatal exposure to traffic- related air pollution and risk of early childhood cancers. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2013, 178, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shah, A.S.V. Short term exposure to air pollution and stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015, 350, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. IQAIR. Available online: https://www.iqair.com/world-air-quality-report (accessed on 15 April 2021).
  12. Szadkowski, B.; Kuśmierek, M.; Rybiński, P.; Żukowski, W.; Marzec, A. Application of Earth pigments in cycloolefin copolymer: Protection against combustion and accelerated aging in the full sunlight spectrum. Materials 2020, 13, 3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rybiński, P.; Syrek, B.; Żukowski, W.; Bradło, D. Impact of basalt filler and ceramizable additives on the toxicity of gaseous products emitted from thermal decomposition of silicone rubber composites. Materials 2019, 12, 3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Investigation Method of Determination Gaseous Toxic Products Emitted during Flammability and Thermal Decomposition of Materials; Polish Standard; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warszawa, Poland, 1988; pp. 1–7.
  15. Tsuchiya, Y.; Sumi, K. Evaluation of the toxicity of combustion products. J. Fire Flammabl. 1972, 3, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
  16. Blomqvist, P. Emission from Fires Consequences for Human Safety and the Environmental. Ph.D. Thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  17. Babrauskas, V.; Gann, R.G.; Levin, B.C.; Paabo, M.; Harris, R.H.; Peacock, R.D.; Yusa, S. A methodology for obtaining and using toxic potency data for fire hazard analysis. Fire Saf. J. 1998, 31, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist. TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices; ACGIH Worldwide: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Giebultowicz, J.; Rużycka, M.; Wroczyński, P.; Purser, D.A.; Stec, A.A. Analysis of fire deaths in Poland and influence of smoke toxicity. Forencic Sci. Int. 2017, 277, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Stec, A.A.; Hull, T.R.; Purser, D.A.; Purser, J.A. Fire toxicity assessment: Comparison of asphyxiant yields from laboratory and large scale flaming fires. Fire Saf. Sci. 2014, 11, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Blomquist, P.; Persson, B.; Simonson, M. Fire emissions of organics into the atmosphere. Fire Technol. 2007, 43, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Skribić, B.; Marinkovic, V.; Spaić, S.; Milanko, V.; Branovacki, S. Profiles of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoke from combustion and thermal decomposition of popular wood pellets and sawdust. Microchem. J. 2018, 139, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Biswas, A.K.; Rudolfsson, M.; Brostrom, M.; Umeki, K. Effect of pelletizing conditions on combustion behaviour of single wood pellet. Appl. Energy 2014, 119, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thomas, S.; Wornat, M.K. The effect of oxygen on the yields of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons formed during the pyrolysis and fuel-rich oxidation of catechol. Fuel 2008, 87, 768–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ogawaa, M.; Yoshid, N. Nitrous oxide emission from the burning of agricultural residue. Atmos. Environ. 2005, 39, 3421–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jeon, J.; Kim, H.; Park, J.-H.; Wi, S.; Kim, S. Evaluation of thermal properties and acetaldehyde adsorption performance of sustainable composites using waste wood and biochar. Environ. Res. 2021, 196, 110910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lackmann, C.; Brendt, J.; Seiler, T.B.; Hermann, A.; Metz, A.; Schafer, P.M.; Herres-Pawlis, S.; Hollert, H. The green toxicology approach: Insight towards the eco-toxicologically safe development of benign catalysts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 415, 125889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Spychała, A.; Domagalska, J.; Ćwieląg-Drabek, M.; Marchwińska-Wyrwał, E. Correlation between length of life and exposure to air pollution. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tucki, K.; Orynycz, O.; Wasiak, A.; Świć, A.; Mieszkalski, L.; Wichłacz, J. Low emission resulting from combustion of forest biomass in a small scale heating device. Energies 2020, 13, 5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Plis, A.; Kotyczka-Morańska, M.; Kopczyński, M.; Łabojko, G. Furniture wood waste as a potential renewable Energy source. A thermogravimetric and kinetic analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2016, 125, 1357–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rybiński, P.; Bradło, D.; Żukowski, W.; Syrek, B. Determination of toxic products emission of polymers thermal decomposition using fluidised bed reactor and FTIR analysis. Polym. Test. 2019, 79, 106040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Meder, R.; Stahl, W.; Warburton, P.; Woolley, S.; Earnshaw, S.; Haselhofer, K.; Langenberg, K.; Ebdon, N.; Mulder, R. At-line validation of a process analytical technology approach for quality control of melamine-urea-formaldehyde resin in composite wood-panel production using near infrared spectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme of the fluidized bed reactor: 1—computer storing data from FTIR analyzer; 2—heated probes for sampling the flue gases; 3—batcher; 4—exhaust fan; 5—cyclone; 6—ash trap for coarser particles; 7—movable radiation shield; 8—heating jacket; 9—bubbling bed; 10—air rotameter; 11—blower, for fluidizing air; 12—two thermocouples; 13—flat, perforated metal plate distributor; 14—A/D convertor for thermocouple signals; 15—computer storing chemical analyses quantities and temperature; A—mobile conditioning system of Gasmet DX-4000, B—analyzer FTIR (Gasmet DX-4000), C—Horiba PG250, P—Peltier’s cooler [31].
Figure 1. Scheme of the fluidized bed reactor: 1—computer storing data from FTIR analyzer; 2—heated probes for sampling the flue gases; 3—batcher; 4—exhaust fan; 5—cyclone; 6—ash trap for coarser particles; 7—movable radiation shield; 8—heating jacket; 9—bubbling bed; 10—air rotameter; 11—blower, for fluidizing air; 12—two thermocouples; 13—flat, perforated metal plate distributor; 14—A/D convertor for thermocouple signals; 15—computer storing chemical analyses quantities and temperature; A—mobile conditioning system of Gasmet DX-4000, B—analyzer FTIR (Gasmet DX-4000), C—Horiba PG250, P—Peltier’s cooler [31].
Energies 14 03247 g001
Figure 2. TG and DSC curves of beech wood.
Figure 2. TG and DSC curves of beech wood.
Energies 14 03247 g002
Figure 3. TG curves of beech wood, pellets, OSB and MDF.
Figure 3. TG curves of beech wood, pellets, OSB and MDF.
Energies 14 03247 g003
Figure 4. Wmean toxicometric index determined for beech wood, pellet, OSB and MDF at 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C.
Figure 4. Wmean toxicometric index determined for beech wood, pellet, OSB and MDF at 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C.
Energies 14 03247 g004
Figure 5. CO2 equivalent of toxic greenhouse gases converted per gram of sample mass.
Figure 5. CO2 equivalent of toxic greenhouse gases converted per gram of sample mass.
Energies 14 03247 g005
Table 1. Thermal analysis of tested wood and wood-based materials.
Table 1. Thermal analysis of tested wood and wood-based materials.
MaterialT5/°CT50/°CTRMAX/°C dm/dt/%/minΔTs/°CP600/%
Beech11033033016.36410–4601.78
PELLET10434033715.30420–4801.54
OSB11533733111.79390–5553.10
MDF10833732811.68435–5602.47
Table 2. Flammability of wood and wood-based materials.
Table 2. Flammability of wood and wood-based materials.
SampleHRRMAX/W/gTHRRMAX/°CTHR/kJ/kgHRC/J/gK
Beech19536114.5171
PELLET21037116.8204
OSB14235412.4140
MDF16734514.2164
Table 3. Toxicity classification of gas destructs.
Table 3. Toxicity classification of gas destructs.
WLC50SMToxic Properties of Thermal Decomposition and Combustion Products of Materials
≤15Very toxic
>5, ≤40Toxic
>40Moderately toxic
Table 4. Specific emission for selected, according to the standard, gas destructs formed during the decomposition of beech wood, pellet, OSB and MDF at 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C [14].
Table 4. Specific emission for selected, according to the standard, gas destructs formed during the decomposition of beech wood, pellet, OSB and MDF at 400, 500, 600, 700 and 800 °C [14].
Emissions g/g T = 400 °C
ProductCO2CONO2SO2HClHCN
Beech0.724 ± 0.0310.153 ± 0.0070.004 ± 0.000.0004 ± 0.000.0002 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
PELLET0.686 ± 0.0670.155 ± 0.0080.006 ± 0.0010.0004 ± 0.000.0002 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
OSB1.393 ± 0.0410.136 ± 0.0110.004 ± 0.0030.0002 ± 0.000.000 ± 0.000.0013 ± 0.00
MDF1.871 ± 0.0680.141 ± 0.0130.005 ± 0.0020.0001 ± 0.000.0001 ± 0.000.0018 ± 0.00
Emission, g/g T = 500 °C
Beech1.183 ± 0.0620.232 ± 0.0260.0019 ± 0.0010.0002 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0001 ± 0.00
PELLET1.159 ± 0.0940.267 ± 0.0160.0019 ± 0.0010.0005 ± 0.000.0001 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
OSB1.557 ± 0.1410.274 ± 0.0110.0032 ± 0.0010.0009 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0030 ± 0.00
MDF1.778 ± 0.0970.307 ± 0.0100.0027 ± 0.0010.0007 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0055 ± 0.00
Emission, g/g T = 600 °C
Beech1.386 ± 0.040.312 ± 0.0180.0001 ± 0.000.0003 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0003 ± 0.00
PELLET1.366 ± 0.1080.329 ± 0.0320.0003 ± 0.000.0004 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0002 ± 0.00
OSB1.681 ± 0.1010.301 ± 0.0430.0007 ± 0.000.0009 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0039 ± 0.00
MDF1.751 ± 0.1340.269 ± 0.1150.0011 ± 0.000.0007 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0063 ± 0.002
Emission, g/g T = 700 °C
Beech1.558 ± 0.0850.314 ± 0.0250.0007 ± 0.000.0004 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0002 ± 0.00
PELLET1.481 ± 0.0730.373 ± 0.0850.0007 ± 0.000.0003 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0001 ± 0.00
OSB1.949 ± 0.0140.152 ± 0.0880.0007 ± 0.000.0005 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0018 ± 0.00
MDF1.829 ± 0.0010.182 ± 0.0730.0007 ± 0.000.0004 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0037 ± 0.00
Emission, g/g T = 800 °C
Beech2.129 ± 0.0960.101 ± 0.0030.0002 ± 0.000.0011 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0001 ± 0.00
PELLET2.176 ± 0.0570.0089 ± 0.0020.0008 ± 0.000.0005 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
OSB2.109 ± 0.2460.0092 ± 0.0020.0004 ± 0.000.0004 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0003 ± 0.00
MDF2.103 ± 0.2070.0081 ± 0.0020.0004 ± 0.000.0003 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.0004 ± 0.00
Table 5. Volume of gaseous destructs (CO2, CO, NO2, SO2, HCl, HCN) formed during thermal decomposition of the tested materials.
Table 5. Volume of gaseous destructs (CO2, CO, NO2, SO2, HCl, HCN) formed during thermal decomposition of the tested materials.
V, cm3/g of Sample
400 °C500 °C600 °C700 °C800 °C
Beech529.3 ± 22.5848.8 ± 54.21027.0 ± 33.41126.0 ± 43.01177.2 ± 53.3
PELET511.7 ± 43.0865.7 ± 61.71031.9 ± 48.11134.8 ± 66.41200.1 ± 32.9
OSB883.5 ± 23.11094.2 ± 67.81184.9 ± 20.91202.7 ± 102.51165.5 ± 134.4
MDF1150.9 ± 40.51242.4 ± 60.21197.3 ± 49.21164.3 ± 91.61161.2 ± 116.0
Table 6. LC 30 50 concentration limits of gaseous thermal decomposition products (CO2, CO, NO2, SO2, HCl, HCN) [14,31].
Table 6. LC 30 50 concentration limits of gaseous thermal decomposition products (CO2, CO, NO2, SO2, HCl, HCN) [14,31].
CompoundFormula LC   30 50 ,   g / m 3
Carbon dioxideCO2196.4
Carbon monoxideCO3.750
Hydrogen cyanideHCN0.160
Nitrogen dioxideNO20.205
Hydrogen chlorideHCl1.000
Sulfur dioxideSO20.700
Table 7. Values of toxicometric indices for beech wood, pellets, OSB and MDF.
Table 7. Values of toxicometric indices for beech wood, pellets, OSB and MDF.
SampleTr/°CWLC50 [g/m3]WLC50MWLC50SM
CO2CONO2SO2HClHCN
Beech400273 ±1224 ± 1100 ± 5---18.32 ± 0.8425.75
500166 ± 816 ± 2----14.78 ± 1.59
600142 ± 412 ± 1-4449 ± 544-495 ± 11910.82 ± 0.65
700126 ± 712 ± 1---848 ± 13610.79 ± 0.72
80092 ± 4388 ± 113----74.04 ± 5.64
PELLET400288 ± 3024 ± 182 ± 81368 ± 309--17.33 ± 1.0625.20
500170 ± 1414 ± 1318 ± 691513 ± 315--12.35 ± 0.72
600145 ± 1111 ± 1-7290 ±2715-696 ± 12110.43 ± 0.92
700133 ± 710 ± 2---1584 ± 4549.50 ± 2.03
80091 ± 4486 ± 114----76.40 ± 4.82
OSB400141 ± 428 ± 2152 ± 26--127 ± 1217.27 ± 0.9522.78
500127 ± 1214 ± 1239 ± 44888 ± 224-53 ± 29.48 ± 0.17
600117 ± 713 ± 2591 ± 851662 ± 213-41 ± 68.73 ± 1.07
700102 ± 1221 ± 9450 ± 999158 ± 2937-77 ± 2513.76 ± 4.84
80094 ± 20370 ± 44-4818 ± 209-553 ± 12364.68 ± 6.05
MDF400105 ± 427 ± 2171 ± 16--89 ± 1015.51 ± 0.9420.81
500111 ± 612 ± 0383 ± 211098 ± 213-29 ± 57.82 ± 0.56
600113 ± 916 ± 7293 ± 1162062 ± 361-28 ± 128.71 ± 3.25
700107 ± 1018 ± 1939 ± 592--39 ± 310.79 ± 0.63
80090 ± 2411 ± 73---365 ± 5861.21 ± 4.41
Table 8. Wmean toxicometric index determined in the temperature range 400–800 °C.
Table 8. Wmean toxicometric index determined in the temperature range 400–800 °C.
SampleWmean (m3/mg)
400 (°C)500 (°C)600 (°C)700 (°C)800 (°C)
Beech0.54 ± 0.030.58 ± 0.050.30 ± 0.010.02 ± 0.010.004 ± 0.002
Pellets0.66 ± 0.020.68 ± 0.010.31 ± 0.040.04 ± 0.010.002 ± 0.002
OSB0.43 ± 0.020.49 ± 0.030.16 ± 0.060.01 ± 0.000.002 ± 0.000
MDF0.41 ± 0.020.44 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.070.01 ± 0.000.002 ± 0.001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rybiński, P.; Syrek, B.; Szwed, M.; Bradło, D.; Żukowski, W.; Marzec, A.; Śliwka-Kaszyńska, M. Influence of Thermal Decomposition of Wood and Wood-Based Materials on the State of the Atmospheric Air. Emissions of Toxic Compounds and Greenhouse Gases. Energies 2021, 14, 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113247

AMA Style

Rybiński P, Syrek B, Szwed M, Bradło D, Żukowski W, Marzec A, Śliwka-Kaszyńska M. Influence of Thermal Decomposition of Wood and Wood-Based Materials on the State of the Atmospheric Air. Emissions of Toxic Compounds and Greenhouse Gases. Energies. 2021; 14(11):3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113247

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rybiński, Przemysław, Bartłomiej Syrek, Mirosław Szwed, Dariusz Bradło, Witold Żukowski, Anna Marzec, and Magdalena Śliwka-Kaszyńska. 2021. "Influence of Thermal Decomposition of Wood and Wood-Based Materials on the State of the Atmospheric Air. Emissions of Toxic Compounds and Greenhouse Gases" Energies 14, no. 11: 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113247

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop