Next Article in Journal
A Piezoelectric Harvesting Interface with Capacitive Partial Electric Charge Extraction for Energy Harvesting from Irregular High-Voltage Input
Next Article in Special Issue
Rural Public Acceptance of Wind and Solar Energy: A Case Study from Mersing, Malaysia
Previous Article in Journal
A Method to Introduce Building Performance Simulation to Beginners
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ideology and Value Determinants of Public Support for Energy Policies in the U.S.: A Focus on Western States
Open AccessArticle

Public Preferences in a Shifting Energy Future: Comparing Public Views of Eight Energy Sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest

1
Graduate Program on the Environment, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA 98505, USA
2
School of Public Policy, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(8), 1940; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081940
Received: 1 February 2020 / Revised: 3 April 2020 / Accepted: 5 April 2020 / Published: 15 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Acceptability of Alternative Energy Technology)
The U.S. and Canada continue to face major changes in energy production. Mounting awareness of the climate crisis has placed increasing importance on developing renewable energy sources, however, advances in fossil fuel extraction technology have opened vast domestic reserves of oil and natural gas. Public preferences for energy policy play a role in determining energy futures, but researchers rarely simultaneously compare public views across multiple renewable and non-renewable energies or across country boundaries. Here, we used a 2019 online survey sample (n = 1500) to compare predictors of support for eight fuel sources for electricity generation in British Columbia, Canada, and Washington and Oregon, USA. Results indicate the highest support overall for renewables (wind, solar, wave/tidal energy, geothermal) and the lowest for fossil fuels (coal and natural gas), nuclear, and hydropower. Mixed-effects regression modeling indicates that views on climate and the balance between environment and economy were consistent predictors of support across most energy types, while political ideology was less consistent. Perceived local importance of both extractive and renewable energy industries were significant predictors of support for some, but not all, energy sources, as were education and gender. Overall, our research suggests that while divisions persist in public energy preferences for both renewable and non-renewable sources, there is the broadest support for renewable energy technologies. View Full-Text
Keywords: public opinion; social acceptability; renewable energy; fossil fuels; energy policy public opinion; social acceptability; renewable energy; fossil fuels; energy policy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hazboun, S.O.; Boudet, H.S. Public Preferences in a Shifting Energy Future: Comparing Public Views of Eight Energy Sources in North America’s Pacific Northwest. Energies 2020, 13, 1940.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop