Next Article in Journal
A New Method for Peer-to-Peer Energy Exchange in Distribution Grids
Previous Article in Journal
Modelling Heat Pumps with Variable EER and COP in EnergyPlus: A Case Study Applied to Ground Source and Heat Recovery Heat Pump Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/en13040795
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rhodotorula toruloides Single Cell Oil Production Using Eucalyptus urograndis Hemicellulose Hydrolysate as a Carbon Source

by
Helberth Júnnior Santos Lopes
1,
Nemailla Bonturi
2 and
Everson Alves Miranda
1,*
1
Department of Materials and Bioprocess Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, State University of Campinas, Campinas SP 13083-852, Brazil
2
Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(4), 795; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040795
Submission received: 10 December 2019 / Revised: 5 February 2020 / Accepted: 7 February 2020 / Published: 12 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section A4: Bio-Energy)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Microbial oil is a potential substitute for vegetable oils in the biodiesel industry. Efforts to obtain cheap carbon sources for the cultivation of lipid-producing microorganisms comprise an active research area. This work aimed to extract the hemicellulose fraction from Eucalyptus uograndis and to use its hydrolysate as a carbon source for Rhodotorula toruloides (an oleaginous yeast) cultivation for microbial oil production. Hemicellulose hydrothermal extractions were performed at different temperatures, times, and ratios of solid to liquid (S/L). Temperature and time showed a stronger effect on the solubilization of hemicellulose. Hemicellulose extraction at 155 °C, 195 min, and an S/L ratio of 1/2 resulted in a hydrolysate with a xylose content of 37.0 g/l. R. toruloides cultivation in this hydrolysate showed that initial pH had a strong influence on cell growth. At an initial pH of 6.2, cells grew to 6.0 g/l of biomass with a lipid content of 50%. Therefore, we believe that E. urograndis hemicellulose hydrolysate could be a potential substrate for R. toruloides for lipid production based on the biorefinery concept.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The International Energy Outlook/2017 projected that world energy consumption could increase by 28% from 2015 to 2040, which would lead to higher fossil fuel utilization and consequently intensify problems linked to its use, especially environmental ones [1]. Development of renewable energy sources, such as biodiesel, is considered to be key to overcoming these issues.
Biodiesel is obtained after the transesterification of triacylglycerol, generating glycerol as a byproduct, and its production is projected to reach more than 40 billion liters in 2025 [2]. However, the main drawback is using edible vegetable oils as feedstock, taking up 70–95% of biodiesel operational costs [3]. Microbial oils (single cell oil, SCO) are a potential alternative feedstock as they do not compete with the edible sectors and their production can be done in bioreactors (in areas an order of magnitude smaller than the area required for crop cultivation) and regardless of weather and geopolitical conditions [4].
Oleaginous microorganisms are those that can accumulate more than 20% of their dry mass in the form of lipids. Rhodotorula toruloides (previously called Rhodosporidium toruloides [5]) is a promising oleaginous yeast for the biodiesel industry, since it can accumulate more than 67% of its cell mass in the form of lipids [6]. However, its relatively high costs of cultivation are a barrier to making its SCO an economically feasible raw material for biodiesel production. When R. toruloides is cultivated with conventional sugars like glucose, the substrate can represent up to 70% of the operational cost [7]. An alternative source of cheap carbon is hemicellulose hydrolysate, a byproduct of many agro-industrial sectors as ethanol, pulp and paper, and beverages. Since cellulose is targeted at second-generation ethanol production in sugarcane biorefineries and in the pulp and paper industry, it is the most valuable wood fraction, and hemicellulose has, as yet, no direct noble utilization in these industries. Moreover, hemicellulose is the second most abundant carbohydrate in nature, composing one-quarter of dry vegetable biomass [8], which allows this fraction to be considered an abundant feedstock for industrial purposes.
In the kraft pulping process, wood chips are treated with a white liquor at high temperatures (145–170 °C) and pressure, aiming at delignifying the biomass and obtaining the raw cellulose. After the cooking process, the solid phase (mainly cellulose) is washed and a black liquor containing 65% solids composed mainly of solubilized lignin and hemicellulose is generated [9]. This liquor is commonly burned in boilers to generate heat for plant operation [10,11]. Lignin has a relatively high specific heat (around 27 MJ/kg), while the specific heat of hemicellulose is only around half of this value. Therefore, hemicellulose contributes to lowering the heat generation efficiency of the boiler. Hence, there is an opportunity to develop new and more valuable strategies for hemicellulose utilization, thereby adding more value to this wood fraction. One possibility involves using hemicellulose hydrolysates as a carbon source for biologic processes to obtain high-value products [11] such as SCO for biodiesel production.
There are few reports in the literature regarding SCO production using wood hemicellulose fractions: Osório-Gonzáles et al. [12] reported the use of a hemicellulose fraction without mentioning its source, Brandenburg et al. [13] used birch, and Matsakas et al. [14] used Betula pendula. To our knowledge, there is no report of eucalyptus hemicellulose hydrolysate (EHH) utilization for SCO production, although there are only a few works that used EHH as a carbon source for xylitol production [15,16,17,18]. Brazil is the world’s second largest cellulose pulp producer and one of the largest Eucalyptus ssp. producers, with 5.7 million hectares planted in 2018 [19]. Taking this into consideration, and because E. urograndis is one of the major subspecies cropped [20,21], Brazil has a promising future in the utilization of hemicellulose from woody biomass for microbial oil production in the biodiesel industry. Therefore, this work evaluated the use of hemicellulose hydrolysate from E. urograndis as a carbon source for microbial oil production. A set of experiments determined conditions for hemicellulose extraction using the hydrothermal method and a hydrolysate with high xylose concentration obtained based on these first experiments was used for the cultivation of Rhodotorula toruloides, an oleaginous yeast considered a workhorse for biotechnology applications [5].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Wood Samples

E. urograndis chips, donated by Fibria (Jacareí, Brazil), a pulp and paper company, were milled with a knife mill. Eighty-two percent of the particles in the ground chips used for hemicellulose extraction ranged in size from 65 to 32 mesh. According to Fibria, the woody biomass was composed of the sugars (%, m/m) glucose (47%), xylose (13%), and mannose (1.14%), in addition to other compounds. This xylose content of 13% (m/m) was used as the basis for calculating the xylose yields in the present work.

2.2. Microorganism

The R. toruloides used in this work was a strain that had been adapted to grow in sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate (the adapted strain was named Rhodosporidium toruloides CCT 7815) [22]. The strain was kept at −80 °C in glycerol solution (10% v/v).

2.3. Reactor for Hemicellulose Extraction

Hemicellulose extraction was carried out in a model TE-028 oven (Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brazil) in which stainless steel cylindrical reactors (100 mL of working volume) were agitated by tumbling by being fixed to a shaft rotating at 60 rpm.

2.4. Other Materials

All reagents used in this work were of analytical grade. All solutions were prepared using MilliQ ultra-pure water (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Cultivations were done in 250 ml Erlenmayer flasks using 20% of the total volume, then incubated in a model TE-4200 orbital shaker (Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brazil) at 28 °C and 200 rpm. A model 5804R centrifuge (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was operated at 4 °C and 8228 g for 15 min for cell recovery. Lipid determination required amber Schott flasks (100 mL), a model ME 1 vacuum pump (Vaccubrand, Wertheim, Germany), a model LR-271C oven (Grieve, IL, USA), and a model TE-211 rotary evaporator (Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brasil). All material was sterilized at 121 °C for 15 min using an autoclave. All solutions for cultivations were sterilized using a 0.22 µm JetBiofil filter (Guangzhou Jet Bio-Filtration, Guangzhou, China). Statistica® 7.0 software was used for experiment design and statistical calculations.

2.5. Hemicellulose Extraction from Ground Wood Chips

Water was added to 10 g of ground wood to achieve different solid-to-liquid (S/L) ratios in the cylindrical reactors. The reactors were then closed and kept rotating in the extraction oven for specific durations and at specific temperatures. Next, the material was filtered using filter paper (Unifil, Germany), and the solubilized hemicellulose in the liquid phase was hydrolyzed at 121 °C for 60 min with addition of 0.5% (v/v) H2SO4 accordingly [23]. Hydrolysates were pH-adjusted to a specific value with CaO (5.0 or 6.2) and were filtered using quantitative paper, then sterilized as described in Section 2.4.

2.6. Microorganism Cultivation

The R. toruloides inoculum was prepared starting with cell reactivation in a Falcon-type tube containing 10 mL of YPD (yeast extract–peptone–dextrose) medium and 1 mL of cells for 24 h at 200 rpm and 28 °C. Then, reactivated cells were transferred to a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing YPD medium and were kept in an orbital shaker for 24 h at 28 °C and 200 rpm. Finally, cells were separated by centrifugation and suspended in 0.9% NaCl solution to a OD (absorbance at 600 nm) of 20.
Cultivation was done in triplicate in a medium composed of 44 mL of EHH, 5 mL of inoculum, and 1 mL of mineral solution [24]. For the first cultivation study, KH2PO4 and yeast extract (3.8% ammoniacal nitrogen and 10.5% total nitrogen) were used to achieve the desired carbon-to-phosphorus (C/P) and carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) molar ratios, respectively. Flasks were incubated for 96 h for the first set of cultivations. The second set of cultivations—with concentrated EHH (cEHH)—took 120 h, 24 h longer than the first set due to a higher concentration of the carbon source. In both sets, sampling for dry cell mass and lipid content determination occurred only at the end of cultivation.

2.7. Analytical Methods

The total sugar content was quantified as reducing sugar utilizing the method proposed by Miller [25], using xylose as the standard. The xylose, acetic acid, glucose, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), and furfural concentrations were determined using HPLC equipment (Dionex Ultimate model 3000, ThermoScientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with an HPX-87H column (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 50 °C, with 5 mmol/L H2SO4 at 0.6 mL/min as the mobile phase.
Cell growth was monitored via OD at intervals of 24 h. The dry cell mass was quantified gravimetrically: cells were collected by centrifugation at 1790 g at 4 °C for 15 min, washed twice with water, and dried in an oven for 24 h at 100 °C. Lipid quantification of dried cells was also performed gravimetrically after extraction with chloroform and methanol as described in Folch et al. [26].

3. Results

3.1. Hemicellulose Extraction

A first set of extraction runs was completed in accordance with a 22 factorial design to investigate how three crucial factors in the process—S/L ratio, time, and temperature—could affect hemicellulose solubilization (Table 1). In the temperature range studied, only time and temperature affected xylose yield determined as the total mass of xylose present in hydrolysate (Table 2). As reported for other lignocellulosic biomass types, the S/L ratio might have a stronger effect on xylose yields in higher temperature ranges (160–190 °C) [27].
A maximum for the reducing sugar concentration was not achieved. Based on these results, for the extraction time range studied, the global maximum for hemicellulose extraction/reducing sugar yield would be achieved at higher temperatures above 160 °C, the maximum operational temperature of the rotating oven. Therefore, the results indicated that a higher concentration of solubilized hemicellulose could be achieved with longer times and higher temperatures.
The second extraction study was conducted at temperatures ranging from 145 to 160 °C and time ranging from 60 to 240 min with the S/L ratio fixed at 1/8 (Figure 1, Table 3) in a one-factor-at-a-time experimental design. Extractions at 160 °C for 195 or 240 min resulted in near-absolute removal of hemicellulose, and at 155 °C and 195 min, in 95% removal. The concentrations of glucose, arabinose, acetic acid, HMF, and furfural also increased with longer extraction times, in most cases achieving maximum content within 195 min of extraction (Table 3).

3.2. R. toruloides Cultivation and Lipid Production

To verify the best cultivation condition in terms of molar C/P and C/N ratios, experiments based on a central composite design (Table 4) were carried out using EHH obtained from extraction at 160 °C and 195 min.
The best results were obtained with cultivations at the initial C/N ratio of 100: a lipid content of 26.42% for Condition 1 and biomass and productivity of 6.52 g/L and 15.00 g/(L·h) for Condition 2 (Table 5). The lipid content at this initial C/N ratio was slightly higher than that observed at C/N ratios of 400 and 250. In terms of lipid productivity, the best result obtained at the C/N ratio of 100 was slightly higher than the 11.00 g/(L·h) achieved at C/N and C/P ratios of 250 and 50.8, respectively. Regarding biomass production, lower C/N ratios produced higher values. According to the Pareto chart at a 95% confidence level, the effect of the C/N ratio was expressively more significant than that of the C/P ratio (Figure 2).
The relatively low lipid content in all the cultivations was probably due to the low carbon content in the hydrolysate (12.196 g/L of xylose). To overcome this, a concentrated EHH was prepared via hemicelullose extraction at a higher S/L ratio based on data that indicated that the profile of sugar extraction did not change at higher S/L ratios: extractions at the S/L ratio of 1/3 showed that 155 °C and 195 min remained the best conditions for hemicellulose extraction (Figure 3). Then, a hydrolysate (named cEHH) was prepared with an S/L of 1:2 at 155 °C for 195 min (Table 6). After liming, it contained 3 times more xylose (37.399 g/L) than the highest content previously obtained (12.196 g/L) (Table 3).
No growth was detected in the first cultivations with cEHH (initial pH of 5.0), even with water-diluted hydrolysate at 30%, 50%, and 70%. However, cultivation at an initial pH of 6.2 was successful (Figure 4). This cultivation resulted in a biomass of 6.0 g/L and a lipid content of 50%. At the beginning of fermentation, xylose was at 32 g/L, and 30% of this sugar was consumed after 120 h of cultivation. Acetic acid was completely consumed after 96 h of cultivation, increasing the broth pH to 7.8. Glucose was rapidly depleted in 24 h.

4. Discussion

4.1. Hemicellulose Extraction

Extractions for durations of 195 and 240 min resulted in hydrolysates with the highest sugar content. However, the extraction at 155 °C and 195 min was considered the most efficient, since 95% hemicellulose was achieved in less time and with less energy than with extractions at 240 min and 160 °C. The reducing sugar concentration obtained in 195 min of extraction was slightly higher than those concentrations obtained in 240 min. This is possibly a result of monomer degradation due to pH drop and autohydrolysis. This drop in pH during hydrothermal hemicellulose extraction at high pressure and temperature is a result of water autoionization, producing a higher concentration of H3O+ [28]. The formation of acetic acid after cleavage of acetyl groups from hemicellulose also contributes to this drop in pH [29]. This phenomenon represents the release of acetic acid from acetyl groups and secondary reactions that produces reducing groups such as levulinic and formic acids from the monomers (sugars) [30,31].
Selective extraction of hemicellulose is paramount to the idea of adding value to biomass utilization and keeping cellulose characteristics intact (not interfering in pulp processing). It is possible that cellulose was not attacked during the hydrothermal extraction since xylose accounted for 96% of the total sugar in the hydrolysate obtained with extractions at 195° and 155 °C (Table 3). The glucose present in the hydrolysate possibly originated from the hemicellulose, since the hemicellulose fraction of eucalyptus is composed of xylose, glucose, mannose, arabinose, rhamnose, and galactose [32].
The best conditions for xylose extraction (96% of sugars in the hydrolysate as xylose) in the present work, even under relatively mild conditions, are considerably better than those reported in the specific literature. Gallina et al. [33] achieved 82% as the maximum global yield of pentose during continuous hemicellulose extraction at 285 °C. Rafiqul and Sakinah [34] studied the effect of time, acid concentration, and S/L ratio during wood sawdust hemicellulose extraction and hydrolysis. Those authors reported a maximum yield of 86% xylose after extraction/hydrolysis at 125 °C, for 60 min, with an S/L ratio of 8, and with 4% (v/v) H2SO4 [29].

4.2. R. toruloides Cultivation and Lipid Production

The SCO content (26.42%) obtained with R. toruloides cultivation in EHH extracted at an S/L ratio of 1/8 is much lower than those found in the literature, where values of up to 67.5% of lipid content were reported [6]. A possible reason for this low lipid content might be the low xylose concentration—12.196 g/l, less than half of the sugar content reported in related work [14,22]. Therefore, the next step to enhance biomass and lipid production was to use a hydrolysate with a higher concentration of xylose. However, the conditions to increase the sugar concentration in the hydrolysate result in higher concentrations of secondary compounds such as HMF, furfural, and acetic acid that can inhibit growth. This was observed in the first cultivation trial using cEHH reported in this work.
Since the hydrolysate pH after liming was 5.0, only slightly higher than the pKa (4.75) of acetic acid, the undissociated form of acetic acid may have diffused into intracellular cytosol, producing a pH drop in the cytoplasm and inhibiting cellular growth [35]. Adjusting the cEHH pH to 6.2 solved this problem. At a pH of 5.0, 3.56 g/L of acetic acid was in an undissociated form, while at a pH of 6.2, the concentration of undissociated acetic acid was almost 10 times lower. Acetic acid inhibition in cultivations at low pH values was also observed by Brandenburg et al. [13]. Those authors found that acetic acid at 3.8 g/L and pH 4.9 inhibited Lipomyces starkeyi growth. However, at this same pH value and 2.11 g/L of acetic acid, they observed yeast growth. These authors also observed L. starkeyi growth at an acetic acid concentration of 3.9 g/L, but at pH 6.0. Comparing this case with cultivation using cEHH in the present work, we can conclude that when this weak organic acid is present, the pH level interferes more with yeast development than does the organic acid concentration.
Even with more xylose in the cEHH, the biomass content (6.00 g/L) was almost the same as that observed with EHH cultivations (6.54 g/L). However, the lipid content increased almost 100% in cultivations with cEHH, achieving 50%. The higher concentration of acetic acid in cEHH possibly enhanced lipid production, since this carbon source is linked to lipid production and accumulation. Acetic acid has a shorter pathway than glucose and xylose when used in cell maintenance [36]. This acid is converted into acetyl-CoA and acyl-CoA in sequence. Therefore, when the system is under nutrient limitation (e.g., nitrogen depletion), acetyl-CoA in excess is driven towards lipogenesis [36]. Interestingly, arabinose was not assimilated by the yeast. The effect of catabolic repression is not likely to be the answer, since during glucose consumption, acetic acid and xylose were simultaneously consumed (Figure 4). The growth stopped in parallel with acetic acid depletion. Possibly, acetic acid consumption resulted in a pH (7.8) that inhibited adequate cell development. Moreover, metabolites formed during cultivation might also contribute to this reduction in growth.
Acetic acid was consumed faster than xylose, with consumption rates of 93.00 mg/(L·h) and 79.00 mg/(L·h), respectively (Figure 4). Acetic acid consumption by R. toruloides is an important characteristic of this yeast, since this carbon source is commonly present in hemicellulosic hydrolysates. Moreover, studies have tested the potential use of acetic acid co-generated during anaerobic treatment of wastewater as a carbon source for lipid production by yeasts [37,38]. Therefore, this acid is a potential source of cheap carbon for lipid production, since wastewater treatment by anaerobic bacteria is widely used by many industries [39].
Brandenburg et al. [13] studied pH-stat fed-batch cultivation of R. toruloides using birch wood hemicellulosic hydrolysate as a carbon source and reported 15.63 g/L of biomass and 51.3% lipid content. These authors used hydrolysate with a xylose content similar to that used in this work, achieving better results, probably due to their fed-batch cultivation process. In this operational mode it is possible to control variables such as pH, aeration, and carbon source feeding throughout the cultivation, differently from experiments done with shake flasks. Matsakas et al. [14] observed biomass and lipid production of 7.1 g/L and 2.8 g/L, respectively (39% lipid content), during the cultivation of R. toruloides in a bioreactor with agitation and aeration control using Betula pendula hemicellulosic hydrolysate as a carbon source. However, in that experiment, the authors pretreated the hydrolysate to remove acetic acid with Bacillus sp. and furfural and phenols by treatment with activated carbon.

5. Conclusions

R. toruloides was able to grow and produce SCO when cultivated using eucalyptus hemicellulose hydrolysate, showing that it has the potential to be a source of low-cost raw material for the biodiesel chain of production. The results obtained in the present work showed that concentrated hemicellulose hydrolysates obtained from extraction at higher S/L ratios enhance lipid production by R. toruloides. Moreover, working with cEHH (with a high acetic acid concentration) requires setting the pH above the acetic acid pKa value to enable microbial growth and lipid production. Under this condition, acetic acid can be assimiliated by R. toruloides and take part directly in lipogenesis, resulting in a higher lipid content. Therefore, the hemicellulose fraction from industrial wood species can be used as a carbon source for large-scale cultivation of oleaginous yeasts and contribute to the production of biodiesel based on microbial oil.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.J.S.L., N.B. and E.A.M. Methodology, H.J.S.L., N.B. and E.A.M.; Formal Analysis, H.J.S.L.; Investigation H.J.S.L., N.B. and E.A.M.; Resources, E.A.M.; Data Curation, H.J.S.L.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, H.J.S.L.; Writing-Review & Editing, N.B. and E.A.M.; Supervision, E.A.M.; Project Administration, E.A.M.; Funding Acquisition, E.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), grant number 152033/2015-7, São Paulo Research Foudation (FAPESP) grant number 2016/10636-8, and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant number 668997.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Sindélia Freitas Azzoni and Dr. Adriano Pinto Mariano for their critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Energy Outlook 2019. Available online: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/ (accessed on 4 September 2018).
  2. OECD/FAO Agrucultural Outlook—Biofuels. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2016-en (accessed on 24 September 2018).
  3. Azócar, L.; Ciudad, G.; Heipieper, H.J.; Navia, R. Biotechnological processes for biodiesel production using alternative oils. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88, 621–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Donot, F.; Fontana, A.; Baccou, J.C.; Strub, C.; Schorr-Galindo, S. Single cell oils (SCOs) from oleaginous yeasts and moulds: Production and genetics. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 68, 135–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Park, Y.-K.; Nicaud, J.-M.; Ledesma-Amaro, R. The Engineering Potential of Rhodosporidium toruloides as a Workhorse for Biotechnological Applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, Y.; Zhao, Z.K.; Bai, F. High-density cultivation of oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides Y4 in fed-batch culture. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 41, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Koutinas, A.A.; Chatzifragkou, A.; Kopsahelis, N.; Papanikolaou, S.; Kookos, I.K. Design and techno-economic evaluation of microbial oil production as a renewable resource for biodiesel and oleochemical production. Fuel 2014, 116, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schädel, C.; Richter, A.; Blöchl, A.; Hoch, G. Hemicellulose concentration and composition in plant cell walls under extreme carbon source-sink imbalances. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 139, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fernández-Rodríguez, J.; Erdocia, X.; Hernández-Ramos, F.; Alriols, M.G.; Labidi, J. Lignin Separation and Fractionation by Ultrafiltration. In Separation of Functional Molecules in Food by Membrane Technology; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019; pp. 229–265. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vila, C.; Romero, J.; Francisco, J.L.; Garrote, G.; Parajó, J.C. Extracting value from Eucalyptus wood before kraft pulping: Effects of hemicelluloses solubilization on pulp properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 5251–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Engelberth, A.; van Walsum, G. Adding Value to the Integrated Forest Biorefinery with Co-Products from Hemicellulose-Rich Pre-Pulping Extract. In Biorefinery Co-Products: Phytochemicals, Primary Metabolites and Value-Added Biomass Processing; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 287–310. [Google Scholar]
  12. Osorio-González, C.S.; Hegde, K.; Ferreira, P.; Brar, S.K.; Kermanshahipour, A.; Soccol, C.R.; Avalos-Ramírez, A. Lipid production in Rhodosporidium toruloides using C-6 and C-5 wood hydrolysate: A comparative study. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 130, 105355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brandenburg, J.; Blomqvist, J.; Pickova, J.; Bonturi, N.; Sandgren, M.; Passoth, V. Lipid production from hemicellulose with Lipomyces starkeyi in a pH regulated fed-batch cultivation. Yeast 2016, 33, 451–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Matsakas, L.; Novak, K.; Enman, J.; Christakopoulos, P.; Rova, U. Acetate-detoxification of wood hydrolysates with alkali tolerant Bacillus sp. as a strategy to enhance the lipid production from Rhodosporidium toruloides. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 242, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Silva, S.S.; Felipe, M.G.A.; Silva, J.B.A.; Prata, A.M.R. Acid hydrolysis of Eucalyptus grandis chips for microbial production of xylitol. Process Biochem. 1998, 33, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Converti, A.; Domínguez, J.M.; Perego, P.; da Silva, S.S.; Zilli, M. Wood Hydrolysis and Hydrolyzate Detoxification for Subsequent Xylitol Production. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2000, 23, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Canettieri, E.V.; Silva, J.B.A.E.; Felipe, M.G. Application of factorial design to the study of xylitol production from eucalyptus hemicellulosic hydrolysate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2001, 94, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Diz, J.; Cruz Freire, J.M.; Domínguez, H.; Parajó, J.C. Xylitol Production from Eucalyptus Wood Hydrolysates in Low-Cost Fermentation Media. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2002, 40, 191–197. [Google Scholar]
  19. Instituto Brasileiro de Árvores. Dados do Relatório Ibá 2018. 2017. Available online: https://iba.org/images/shared/Biblioteca/IBA_RelatorioAnual2017.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2018).
  20. Santos, S.A.O.; Villaverde, J.J.; Freire, C.S.R.; Domingues, M.R.M.; Neto, C.P.; Silvestre, A.J.D. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of Eucalyptus grandis, E. urograndis (E. grandis × E. urophylla) and E. maidenii bark extracts. Ind. Crop Prod. 2012, 39, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva, F.T.M.; Ataíde, C.H. Valorization of Eucalyptus urograndis wood via carbonization: Product yields and characterization. Energy 2019, 172, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bonturi, N.; Crucello, A.; Viana, J.A.C.; Miranda, E.A. Microbial oil production in sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate without nutrient supplementation by a Rhodosporidium toruloides adapted strain. Process Biochem. 2017, 57, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sluiter, A.; Hames, B.; Ruiz, R.; Scarlata, C.; Sluiter, J.; Templeton, D. Determination of Sugars, Byproducts, and Degradation Products in Liquid Fraction Process Samples; NREL Technical Report: NREL/TP-510-42623; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Lakewood, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Meesters, P.A.E.P.; Huijberts, G.N.M.; Eggink, G. High-cell-density cultivation of the lipid accumulating yeast Cryptococcus curvatus using glycerol as a carbon source. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 45, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miller, G.L. Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for Determination of Reducing Sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31, 426–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Folch, J.; Lees, M.; Stanley, G.H.S. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar]
  27. Santucci, B.S.; Maziero, P.; Rabelo, S.C.; Curvelo, A.A.S.; Pimenta, M.T.B. Autohydrolysis of Hemicelluloses from Sugarcane Bagasse During Hydrothermal Pretreatment: A Kinetic Assessment. BioEnergy Res. 2015, 8, 1778–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zumdahl, S.S.; Zumdahl, S.A. Chemistry, 7th ed.; Stratton, R., Ed.; Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 629–630. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, S. Woody biomass: Niche position as a source of sustainable renewable chemicals and energy and kinetics of hot-water extraction/hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 563–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yang, B.; Wyman, C.E. Pretreatment: The key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuelsbioprod. Biorefin. Innov. A Sustain. Econ. 2008, 2, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jun, A.; Tschirner, U.W.; Tauer, Z. Hemicellulose extraction from aspen chips prior to kraft pulping utilizing kraft white liquor. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 37, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, S.-N.; Cao, X.-F.; Li, H.-Y.; Xu, F.; Sun, R.-C. Structural characterization of residual hemicelluloses from hydrothermal pretreated Eucalyptus fiber. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 69, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gallina, G.; Cabeza, Á.; Biasi, P.; García-Serna, J. Optimal conditions for hemicelluloses extraction from Eucalyptus globulus wood: Hydrothermal treatment in a semi-continuous reactor. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 148, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Rafiqul, I.S.M.; Sakinah, A.M.M. Design of process parameters for the production of xylose from wood sawdust. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012, 90, 1307–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. van der Pol, E.C.; Bakker, R.R.; Baets, P.; Eggink, G. By-products resulting from lignocellulose pretreatment and their inhibitory effect on fermentations for (bio)chemicals and fuels. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 9579–9593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, Y.; Chi, Z.; Ahring, B.K.; Chen, S. Oleaginous yeast Cryptococcus curvatus for biofuel production: Ammonia’s effect. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 37, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lopes, H.J.S.; Ramos, L.R.; Silva, E.L. Co-Fermentation of Cheese Whey and Crude Glycerol in EGSB Reactor as a Strategy to Enhance Continuous Hydrogen and Propionic Acid Production. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 183, 712–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Veeramalini, J.B.; Selvakumari, I.A.E.; Park, S.; Jayamuthunagai, J.; Bharathiraja, B. Continuous production of biohydrogen from brewery effluent using co-culture of mutated Rhodobacter M 19 and Enterobacter aerogenes. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 286, 121402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Huang, X.-F.; Liu, J.-N.; Lu, L.-J.; Peng, K.-M.; Yang, G.-X.; Liu, J. Culture strategies for lipid production using acetic acid as sole carbon source by Rhodosporidium toruloides. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 206, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Energies 13 00795 g001 550
Figure 1. Xylose yields for hemicellulose extraction at an S/L ratio of 1:8 with different times and temperatures: (X) 145 °C, (○) 150 °C, (∆) 155 °C, and (□) 160 °C. Lines are a guide to the eye.
Figure 1. Xylose yields for hemicellulose extraction at an S/L ratio of 1:8 with different times and temperatures: (X) 145 °C, (○) 150 °C, (∆) 155 °C, and (□) 160 °C. Lines are a guide to the eye.
Energies 13 00795 g001
Energies 13 00795 g002 550
Figure 2. Pareto chart for cultivations with R. toruloides at different C/N and C/P ratios. Standardized effect estimate (absolute values, p = 0.05).
Figure 2. Pareto chart for cultivations with R. toruloides at different C/N and C/P ratios. Standardized effect estimate (absolute values, p = 0.05).
Energies 13 00795 g002
Energies 13 00795 g003 550
Figure 3. Kinetics of total reducing sugar for EHH obtained at 145 °C (×), 150°C (Ο), 155°C (□), and 160 °C (∆) over different durations and at an S/L of 1:3. Lines are a guide to the eye.
Figure 3. Kinetics of total reducing sugar for EHH obtained at 145 °C (×), 150°C (Ο), 155°C (□), and 160 °C (∆) over different durations and at an S/L of 1:3. Lines are a guide to the eye.
Energies 13 00795 g003
Energies 13 00795 g004 550
Figure 4. Kinectics of R. toruloides growth and carbon source consumption. Cultivation time 120 h. Symbols: xylose (o), glucose (×), acetic acid (◊), arabinose (●), and HMF (∆) concentrations; OD at 600 nm. Lines are a guide to the eye.
Figure 4. Kinectics of R. toruloides growth and carbon source consumption. Cultivation time 120 h. Symbols: xylose (o), glucose (×), acetic acid (◊), arabinose (●), and HMF (∆) concentrations; OD at 600 nm. Lines are a guide to the eye.
Energies 13 00795 g004
Table
Table 1. Factors and levels of the 22 factorial design for the first set of extraction runs.
Table 1. Factors and levels of the 22 factorial design for the first set of extraction runs.
FactorLevel
−10+1
T (°C)120140160
t (min)60105150
S/L ratio1/41/61/8
Table
Table 2. Results from the 22 factorial design of hemicellulose extraction.
Table 2. Results from the 22 factorial design of hemicellulose extraction.
T (°C)S/L Ratio (g/mL)Time (min)Total Reducing Sugar (g)
1201/4600.04
1201/8600.03
1201/41500.11
1201/81500.08
1401/61050.19
1401/61050.19
1401/61050.16
1601/4600.13
1601/8600.25
1601/41501.60
1601/81501.56
Table
Table 3. Eucalyptus hemicellulose hydrolysate (EHH) partial composition for extractions at an S/L of 1:8.
Table 3. Eucalyptus hemicellulose hydrolysate (EHH) partial composition for extractions at an S/L of 1:8.
T (°C)t (min)Volume (L)Compound (g/L)
GlucoseXyloseArabinoseAcetic AcidHMFFurfural
145600.1150.2150.4720.0520.0940.0010.013
1500.1350.3264.6680.0731.1370.0170.249
1950.1350.3877.781n.d. 11.8850.0210.424
2400.130.2934.2640.0811.0750.0000.212
150600.1050.1530.5410.0450.0940.0000.017
1500.1350.3727.4470.0541.7670.0220.371
1950.1350.4198.656n.d. 12.1290.0230.516
2400.1370.3486.963n.d. 11.7270.0200.341
155600.1150.1770.3570.0590.0710.0030.007
1500.1330.3446.8090.0521.6490.0170.334
1950.1320.5329.552n.d. 12.3370.0120.652
2400.1300.3908.177n.d. 12.0230.0070.452
160600.1120.1870.5730.0021.7500.0030.410
1500.1300.3207.7900.0011.8400.0180.492
1950.1150.42112.196n.d. 12.4120.0250.587
2400.1100.48912.352n.d. 12.3480.0210.644
1 not detected.
Table
Table 4. Central composite design for cultivations with EHH at different C/N and C/P ratios.
Table 4. Central composite design for cultivations with EHH at different C/N and C/P ratios.
FactorLevel
–1.41–101+1.41
C/N38.5100250400461.5
C/P50.8100220340389.2
Table
Table 5. Results for biomass and lipid production by R. toruloides after 96 h of cultivation in EHH at different C/N and C/P ratios.
Table 5. Results for biomass and lipid production by R. toruloides after 96 h of cultivation in EHH at different C/N and C/P ratios.
SampleC/NC/PBiomass (g/L)Lipid *
(g/L)		Lipid **
(%)		Productivity [mg/(L·h)]
11001005.111.3526.4214.00
21003406.521.4522.2415.00
34001003.050.6922.627.00
44003403.020.3912.914.00
538.52205.960.8113.598.00
6461.52203.160.6420.257.00
725050.84.811.0421.6211.00
8250389.23.880.8421.659.00
92502205.080.7614.968.00
102502203.250.6620.317.00
112502203.750.6517.337.00
* Lipid concentration: mass of lipids per volume of cultivated broth. ** Lipid content: mass of lipids per dry cell mass.
Table
Table 6. cEHH obtained from extraction at 155 °C, 195 min, and an S/L of 1:2 before and after liming.
Table 6. cEHH obtained from extraction at 155 °C, 195 min, and an S/L of 1:2 before and after liming.
OverlimingConcentration (g/L)
XyloseAcetic AcidGlucoseArabinoseHMF
Before47.81014.0921.9651.4580.160
After *37.3999.8841.8100.9500.119
* pH of 6.2.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lopes, H.J.S.; Bonturi, N.; Miranda, E.A. Rhodotorula toruloides Single Cell Oil Production Using Eucalyptus urograndis Hemicellulose Hydrolysate as a Carbon Source. Energies 2020, 13, 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040795

AMA Style

Lopes HJS, Bonturi N, Miranda EA. Rhodotorula toruloides Single Cell Oil Production Using Eucalyptus urograndis Hemicellulose Hydrolysate as a Carbon Source. Energies. 2020; 13(4):795. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040795

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lopes, Helberth Júnnior Santos, Nemailla Bonturi, and Everson Alves Miranda. 2020. "Rhodotorula toruloides Single Cell Oil Production Using Eucalyptus urograndis Hemicellulose Hydrolysate as a Carbon Source" Energies 13, no. 4: 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040795

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop