Next Article in Journal
Drivers and Barriers to Industrial Energy Efficiency in Textile Industries of Bangladesh
Previous Article in Journal
Nafion® Tubing Humidification System for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Power Generation from a Hybrid Generator (TENG-EMG) Run by a Thermomagnetic Engine Harnessing Low Temperature Waste Heat

1
Department of Nuclear and Energy Engineering, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea
2
Clean Innovation Technology Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Jeju 63243, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(9), 1774; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091774
Submission received: 16 April 2019 / Revised: 6 May 2019 / Accepted: 6 May 2019 / Published: 10 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section I: Energy Fundamentals and Conversion)

Abstract

:
This work explored the scavenging of low temperature waste heat and conversion of it into electrical energy through the operation of a gadolinium (Gd) based thermomagnetic engine. Gd is one of the unique materials whose magnetic property changes from ferromagnetic to paramagnetic depending on the temperature (“the Curie temperature”), which is around 20 °C. In the present work, two different types of generators were designed and applied to the rotating shaft of a Gd-based thermomagnetic engine developed for low temperature differential (LTD) applications. Of these, one is the so-called triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG), and the other is the electromagnetic generator (EMG). These have been designed to produce electricity from the rotating shaft of the thermomagnetic engine, exploiting both the electromagnetic and triboelectric effects. When operated at a rotational speed of 251 rpm with a temperature difference of 45 °C between the hot and cold water jets, the hybrid (TENG-EMG) generator produced a combined pulsating DC open circuit voltage of 5 V and a short circuit current of 0.7 mA. The hybrid generator effectively produced a maximum output power of 0.75 mW at a loading resistance of 10 kΩ.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Energy crises all over the world have drawn serious attention to green energy. Many researchers have been paying attention to nanogenerators (NGs) for their wide applicability as well as studying how to harvest energy from the ambient environment to deal with energy related issues. A large amount of low grade waste heat is produced from various industrial processes and discharged into the atmosphere without being put into practical use. The United Nations reported in the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) that around 20% to 50% of the energy given to different industries is lost as waste heat. The opportunity to harvest this low grade thermal energy can open a new pathway and contribute to meet our energy needs.
At present, many researchers are showing interest in utilizing low grade waste heat for power generation. There are many low temperature differential (LTD) heat engines which can scavenge low grade thermal energy into electrical energy [1,2]. Haneman [3] reported a research study based on LTD Stirling engines for energy scavenging. Some other types of magnetic engines have been reported to scavenge low grade thermal energy; however, these engines have some drawbacks and limitations and have not been found to be practical.
The discovery of gadolinium (Gd) [4] was the breakthrough in the development of magnetic engines. Gd is used as a transition material in thermomagnetic engines. Thulium has the same properties as Gd and also can be used as a transition material in magnetic engines. However, Gd is preferred due to cost advantages and greater availability. Gadolinium acts like a ferromagnetic material below its Curie temperature of 20 °C, and is strongly attracted to a magnetic field. On the other hand, it shows paramagnetic behavior above this temperature. Gd causes a relative moment due to the distortion of flux lines in a magnetic field by heating and cooling it above and below the Curie point. When the hot stream of a jet impinges on a Gd block, it becomes paramagnetic while the cold stream of a jet makes it ferromagnetic. This change in the magnetic property of a Gd block interacts with a bar magnet and generates rotational mechanical energy.
In recent years, triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) [5,6,7,8] have been introduced, which can convert mechanical energy, such as wind power [9], ocean waves [10], and rain drops, into electrical energy based on the triboelectric effect and electrostatic induction [11,12]. TENG have advantages, such as light weight, low cost, and simple fabrication [13,14,15]; however, there are some issues related to the output performance of TENG that need further improvement for long term operation. A TENG generates a high output voltage and a very low output current that limit its application to some extent. To overcome these issues, many researchers have hybridized it with other generators, like piezoelectric [16], electromagnetic [17], and thermoelectric generators.
In a previous work, Shaislamov et al. [18] designed a TENG which can produce electricity from a rotating disk driven by an LTD heat engine. They were able to produce an effective output voltage of Voc = 70 V and an output current of about Isc = 0.31 μA from the non-contact sliding mode of the TENG. However, an important issue related to the reported TENG is the very low output current, which needs to be addressed. In the existing TENG, electricity is produced by only the triboelectric effect.
This work presents a hybrid (TENG-EMG) rotating disk type generator integrated with an LTD thermomagnetic engine for converting the rotational mechanical energy of a thermomagnetic engine into electrical energy. The main idea of the proposed work is how to generate energy at a low temperature difference between the heat source and the sink. Therefore, we introduced a novel design for a Gd-based thermomagnetic generator that can work in conjunction with the disk type (TENG-EMG) generator to scavenge low grade thermal energy into electrical energy.
The hybrid (TENG-EMG) generator has a better output performance than that of individual NGs (EMG or TENG). Operated at a rotational speed of 251 rpm, the TENG produces an average open circuit voltage of 9 V and a short circuit current of 0.9 μA while the electromagnetic generator (EMG) produces an average open circuit voltage of 2.3 V and a short circuit current of 1.5 mA under the same rotational speed. The output from both the TENG and EMG were combined for maximum efficiency. The presented thermomagnetic engine is an improved magnetic engine, which produces mechanical work by utilizing the properties of Gd and converts this mechanical energy into electrical energy by using the triboelectric and electromagnetic effect.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Fabrication of the Electromagnetic Generator Part

The EMG rotor and stator parts were fabricated by a 3D printer. The rotor and stator parts are acrylic wheels with an outer diameter of 120 mm and an inner diameter of 110 mm and a thickness of 4 mm. These acrylic wheels were used as a substrate for the magnets and coils. For the rotor of the EMG, 12 cylindrical shaped strong neodymium magnets with the magnetic poles in alternating behavior were assembled with the plastic wheel. The corresponding 12 coils were integrated onto the acrylic substrate in a series connection, which generates an alternating current output when the magnetic flux changes periodically in the coils. Figure 1a,b shows the rotor and stator parts of the EMG, respectively.

2.2. Fabrication of the Triboelectric Nanogenerator Part

The rotor part of the TENG is a segmented structure disk with a diameter of 120 mm. The acrylic disk was fabricated by a 3D printer and used as a substrate for the fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) film. This acrylic disk was coated with an FEP film, as shown in Figure 1c. On the other hand, the stator part of the TENG was fabricated from a 1-mm thick aluminum plate by laser cutting. Both of the aluminum electrodes were attached as shown in Figure 1d. Two wires were linked to the Al electrodes to produce the output current/voltage signals. The combined weight (EMG and TENG) of the rotor part of this hybrid NG is around 90 g.

2.3. Fabrication of the Thermomagnetic Generator

The thermomagnetic engine consists of 16 equally spaced Gd blocks and a strong permanent bar magnet. Three water jets, one hot and two cold, 120° apart from each other, were designed to sequentially heat and cool the Gd blocks above and below its Curie point as shown in the Figure 2a. When the hot water jet on the bar magnet side discharges onto the Gd blocks, it becomes paramagnetic while the cold water jets opposite the bar magnet make it ferromagnetic. This change in the magnetic property of the transition material (Gd blocks) interacts with the bar magnet and makes the rotor turn. Commercially available light weight Nylon beveled gears with a speed ratio of (3:1) and a solid acrylic shaft of 12 mm in diameter were used to integrate the (TENG-EMG) generator with the thermomagnetic engine to convert the mechanical energy into electrical energy, as shown in Figure 2b. The torque of the thermomagnetic engine depends on how fast a magnetic transition takes place between the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic state.

3. Working Principle

The hybrid (TENG-EMG) disk generator produces electricity when there is a relative motion between the rotor and stator parts of the TENG and EMG. The thermomagnetic Gd engine provides rotation to the NG when the hot and cold water jets impinge on the Gd blocks. The Gd block has a curie temperature very near to room temperature, and it changes its magnetic properties, i.e., from ferromagnetic to paramagnetic, depending on its temperature controlled by the water jets.
The rotor of the hybrid generator consists of two layers (1–2) as shown in Figure 3a. Layer 1 is the EMG part with 12 magnets while layer 2 is the TENG part, consisting of a disk with a diameter of 120 mm, which is covered by the FEP as a triboelectric material. The stator of the hybrid NG also consists of two layers (3–4) as shown in Figure 3b. Layer 3 is aluminum electrodes while layer 4 consists of the corresponding 12 serially connected coils, fixed in alignment with the magnets.
The total output energy produced from this generator is divided into two parts: (1) The energy produced by the TENG part; and (2) the energy produced by the EMG part. The TENG produces electricity when both triboelectric surfaces (FEP and Al) are first brought into contact to produce charges due to the difference in the electron affinity between the Al and FEP. This is called the initial contact electrification step in which negative charges appears on the FEP layer and positive charges on the aluminum electrode [19,20,21] as shown in Figure 4. In the next step, the two layers (FEP and Al) are brought away from each other, leaving a small air gap between them.
When the FEP portion rotates from Al1 to Al2, the electrons will move from Al2 to Al1 to cover the potential difference on the FEP surface produced by the negative charges (step II). When the FEP reaches the overlapping position of Al2, most of the electrons will move to Al1, which produces the majority of the positive ions on Al2 (step III). In the next step, the FEP segment will start its motion back toward the adjacent Al1 segment. As such, the electrons will travel back from Al1 to Al2, producing an output current in the opposite direction (step IV) until the FEP segment reaches the primary position. The working principle of the TENG part is shown in Figure 4.
In the experiment, the rotational parts were driven by the thermomagnetic engine at a rotational speed of 251 rpm, and the stationary part was fixed just adjacent to the rotational parts. The schematic diagram and the fabricated model of the whole integrated system (thermomagnetic engine and NG) are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6.
As shown in Figure 5a, the triboelectric generator (layer 2 and layer 3) is sandwiched between the EMG (layer 1 and layer 4). Layer 2 is a thin FEP disk, which is adhered to layer 1 (magnets disk). Layer 1 and layer 2 make up the rotor part of the hybrid (TENG, EMG) generator. Layer 3 is a 1 mm-thick disk-shaped aluminum electrode mounted on layer 4 (coil disk). Layer 3 and layer 4 make the stator part of the hybrid (TENG, EMG) generator. The gap distance between the rotor and stator parts was selected based on the output performance of the generator.
The output of the TENG part relies on the surface charge density, surface area of the FEP and Al, and the rotational angular velocity. The EMG produces an alternating current as directed by Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction based on the periodic change of the magnetic flux in the coils.
Voc = −N dΦ/dt
Isc = Voc/R
The output of the EMG depends on the number of turns (N) of each coil, the internal resistance of the coil (R), and the changing flux, dΦ/dt (rotational speed). The output from both the TENG and EMG were combined for maximum efficiency.

4. Results and Discussion

The non-contact sliding mode of the TENG and conventional EMG was experimentally tested for its application to a Gd based thermomagnetic engine to harness low-temperature heat sources. The Gd based thermomagnetic engine was operated at different temperatures between hot and cold water jets. The cold water jet was kept constant at 18.5 °C while that of the hot water was changed from 22.5 °C to 90 °C. The minimum rotational speed of 77 rpm was measured at the temperature difference of 4 °C. Meanwhile, the maximum rotational speed of 251 rpm was observed when the temperature difference between the two jets reached 45 °C, as shown in Figure 7. In the experiment, the hybrid (TENG-EMG) generator was integrated with the rotating shaft of the thermomagnetic engine, which efficiently harvested both the triboelectric and electromagnetic effect. The open circuit output voltage was measured by 10 MΩ probe of a DS07052B oscilloscope (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) while Keysight B2902A (Keysight, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) was used to measure the short circuit current of the generator. The continuous forward and backward sliding motion of the FEP over the Al electrodes produced an AC voltage signal which was converted to a DC signal with a bridge rectifier as shown in Figure 8. Operated at a continuous rotational speed of 251 rpm for a temperature difference of 45 °C between the hot and cold water jets, the TENG produced an open circuit voltage of 9 V and a short circuit current of 0.9 μA, respectively, with a distance of 1.2 mm between the two triboelectric surfaces. The short circuit current analysis of the TENG is shown in Figure 9. Under the same rotational motion, the EMG produced an average open circuit voltage of 2.3 V and a short circuit current of 1.5 mA, respectively, as shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11. The magnets and coils were 2.5 mm apart from each other when the experiments were carried out for the output performance of the EMG. Figure 12a,b displays the dependence of the resistance on the output current and the corresponding output powers of both the TENG and EMG, respectively. The output currents of the TENG and EMG decreased with increasing load resistance, whereas the output electrical power of both generators initially increased and then decreased under a large loading resistance. The largest output power values of the TENG and EMG were approximately 0.144 μW and 0.88 mW at a loading resistance of 1 MΩ and 1 kΩ, respectively, as shown in Figure 12.
The optimum spacing’s for the TENG and EMG were selected to be 1.2 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively, after carefully analyzing the rotational speed and the output voltage. As far as the TENG is concerned, the various gap distances (ranging from 0.5 mm to 2 mm) between the FEP disk and aluminum electrodes were analyzed before finalizing the optimum value; see Figure 13a. The initial spacing between the FEP disk and the aluminum electrodes was selected to be 0.5 mm, but at this gap distance, the rotor occasionally touched the stator because of its wobbling motion when rotating. This caused a substantial decrease in the rotational speed and hence resulted in a low output voltage. The maximum output voltage of 9 V was observed at a gap distance of 1.2 mm, where the rotor achieved its maximum rotational speed of 251 rpm without interacting (touching) the stator. However, the voltage started to decline when the gap distance exceeded 1.2 mm. This is due to the fact that there was no noticeable increase in the rotational speed (almost the same as in the case of 1.2 mm), but the larger gap distance resulted in a weaker electrostatic interaction between the electrodes.
In conclusion, a gap distance of less than 1.2 mm caused a decrease in the rotational speed due to unwanted occasional contact between the rotor and stator, resulting in the degradation of the TENG’s output performance. Similarly, its performance also degraded when the gap distance was increased beyond 1.2 mm. This is because a further increase in the gap only weakened the electrostatic interaction between the electrodes without any increase in the rotational speed of the shaft driving the generators. The relation between the output performance of the TENG and the gap distances is shown in Figure 13b.
The gap distance of the EMG was dictated by that of the TENG as the latter was designed to be located between the coils and the magnets making up the EMG, as shown in Figure 5a. In other words, the optimum gap for the EMG is inherently dependent on the spacing of the TENG. That is, a change in the spacing of the TENG will result in a change in the gap distance between the magnets and coils. As shown in Figure 13a, the Al electrode and FEP film together require at least 1.3 mm spacing available for installation. Taking this into consideration, the performance of the EMG was analyzed for the gap distances between 1.5 mm and 3 mm as shown in Figure 13c. The optimum spacing of 2.5 mm for the EMG was obtained when the gap distance of the TENG was maintained at 1.2 mm. At a rotational speed of 251 rpm, the EMG produced its maximum output. As aforementioned, a decrease in the spacing to less than 2.5 mm resulted in undesirable interaction between the TENG components, leading to disruptions in the rotation of the shaft driven by the thermomagnetic engine and hence poorer performance for both generators. Similarly, the output performance of the EMG decreased when the gap distance exceeded 2.5 mm. When the spacing for the TENG increased beyond 1.2 mm, the gap distance between the rotor (magnets) and the stator (coils) of the EMG exceeded 2.5 mm, causing weaker magnetic fluxes through the coils of the EMG and hence impairing the EMG’s performance. This can be readily observed in Figure 13c, where the relationship between the gap distance and the output voltage of the EMG is given.
The EMG produced high current output with low impedance whereas the TENG generated low current output with high impedance. Due to the huge difference in the impedance of the two generators, it was difficult to connect them directly in parallel. To deal with this impedance mismatch and to get the optimum electrical output in terms of the voltage and current, transformers were designed for both generators. The turn ratio of the transformers was determined by Equation (3), as given below:
V p V s = N p N s
were Vs and Vp are the voltages of the secondary and primary coils, respectively.
As compared to the TENG (~1 MΩ), the EMG showed much smaller impedance (~1 kΩ). To accomplish impedance matching of the generators, the TENG was connected to a transformer with a turn ratio of 1.8:1. Similarly, the EMG was connected to a transformer with a turn ratio of 1:2:1. After connecting the generators (EMG, TENG) to the transformers, the matched resistance was modulated to about 10 kΩ. A series of measurements demonstrated the capability of the hybrid NG, producing the maximum electrical output power of 0.75 mW at a loading resistance of 10 kΩ as shown in Figure 14. Figure 15 shows the circuit diagram to measure the performance of the hybrid generator where the EMG and TENG are connected in parallel. As shown in Figure 16 and Figure 17, the hybrid generator was capable of producing an open circuit voltage of 5 V and a short circuit current 0.7 mA, respectively. The mechanical power of the system (thermomagnetic engine) was determined by measuring the torque and angular velocity, which is given as:
P = τω
In Figure 18, the mechanical power of the system delivered by the thermomagnetic engine is given at various temperature differences between the hot and cold water jets. The maximum mechanical power of 29.5 mW was observed at the temperature difference of 45 °C between the two jets, when the rotational speed was 251 rpm.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully fabricated a Gd based thermomagnetic engine that can convert waste heat energy into mechanical energy and then provided proof of concept as its final conversion into electrical power by the use of a (TENG-EMG) generator. The conventional EMG and TENG with the non-contact sliding mode was experimentally tested for its application to a Gd based thermomagnetic engine, to reclaim low-temperature waste heat. Under a rotational speed of 251 rpm, the TENG produced an average open circuit voltage of 9 V and a short circuit current of 0.9 μA; meanwhile, the EMG produced an average open circuit voltage of 2.3 V and a short circuit current of 1.5 mA under the same rotational speed. The mechanical to electrical conversion efficiency of the Gd based thermomagnetic engine in the present work was around 2.6%. However, surface treatment of the triboelectric material and coils with a higher cross sectional area can improve the conversion efficiency of the engine. As shown in this work, hybridized generators with a Gd-based thermomagnetic engine may be a significant step forward towards practical applications to harness low grade thermal energy into electrical energy from different industries to fulfill energy demands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z. and Y.K.; methodology, Z. and Y.K.; software, R.A. and S.J.O.; validation, Z., Y.K. and W.C.; formal analysis, Y.K. and S.J.O.; investigation, W.C.; resources, Z.; data curation, R.A. and S.J.O.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.K. and W.C.; visualization, W.C.; supervision, Y.K.; project administration, W.C.; funding acquisition, W.C.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A2A1A05001461).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kongtragool, B.; Wongwises, S. A review of solar-powered Stirling engines and low temperature differential Stirling engines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2003, 7, 131–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Senft, J.R. Ringbom Stirling Engines; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  3. Haneman, D. Theory and Principles of Low-Temperature Hot Air Engines Fueled by Solar Energy; Report Prepared for US Atomic Energy Commission Contract W-7405-Eng-48; Atomic Energy Commission: Washington, DC, USA, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nigh, H.E.; Legvold, S.; Spedding, F. Magnetization and electrical resistivity of gadolinium single crystals. Phys. Rev. 1963, 132, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fan, F.R.; Tian, Z.Q.; Wang, Z.L. Flexible Triboelectric Generator. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fan, F.R.; Lin, L.; Zhu, G.; Wu, W.Z.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Z.L. Transparent Triboelectric nanogenerators and Self Powered Pressure Sensors Based on Micro Patterned Plastic Films. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3109–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Z.L. Triboelectric nanogenerators as New Energy Technology for Self Powered Systems and as active Mechanical and Chemical Sensors. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9533–9557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Jing, Q.; Zhou, Y.S.; Wen, X.; Wang, Z.L. Single Electrode-Based Sliding Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Self Powered Displacement Vector Sensor System. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7342–7351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kornbluh, R.D.; Pelrine, R.; Prahlad, H.; Wong-Foy, A.; McCoy, B.; Kim, S.; Eckerle, J.; Low, T. From Boots to Buoys: Promises and Challenges of Dielectric Elastomer Energy Harvesting. Proc. SPIE 2011, 7976, 7976051–79760519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chiba, S.; Waki, M.; Kornbluh, R.; Pelrine, R. Innovative power generators for energy harvesting using electroactive polymer artificial muscles. Proc. SPIE 2008, 6927, 6927151–6927159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mitcheson, P.D.; Miao, P.; Stark, B.H.; Yeatman, E.M.; Holmes, A.S.; Green, T.C. MEMS Electrostatic Micropower Generator for Low Frequency Operation. Sens. Actuators A 2004, 115, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Naruse, Y.; Matsubara, N.; Mabuchi, K.; Izumi, M.; Suzuki, S. Electrostatic Micro Power Generation from Low-Frequency Vibration Such as Human Motion. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2009, 19, 094002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, S.; Lee, Y.; Kim, D.; Yang, Y.; Lin, L.; Lin, Z.-H.; Hwang, W.; Wang, Z.L. Triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting pendulum oscillation energy. Nano Energy 2013, 2, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, H.; Chen, J.; Tian, L.; Leng, Q.; Xi, Y.; Hu, C. Airflow-induced Triboelectric Nanogenerator as a Self-powered Sensor for Detecting Humidity and Airflow Rate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 17184–17189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Guo, H.; He, X.; Zhong, J.; Zhong, Q.; Leng, Q.; Hu, C.; Chen, J.; Tian, L.; Xi, Y.; Zhou, J. A Nanogenerator for Harvesting Airflow Energy and Light Energy. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 2079–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hassan, G.; Khan, F.; Hassan, A.; Ali, S.; Bae, J.; Hyun, L.C. Flat Panel Shaped Hybrid Piezo/Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Ambient Energy Harvesting. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 175402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Quan, T.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.L.; Yang, Y. Hybridized Electromagnetic–Triboelectric Nanogenerator for a Self-Powered Electronic Watch. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 12301–12310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shaislamov, U.; Kim, Y.; Kim, W.S.; Jeong, H.; Lee, H.-J.; Chun, W. Hybrid operation of triboelectric nanogenerator for electricity generation by a low-temperature differential heat engine. Int. J. Energy Res. 2017, 41, 1412–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Diaz, A.F.; Felix-Navarro, R.M. A Semi Quantitative TriboElectric Series for Polymeric Materials: The Influence of Chemical Structure and Properties. J. Electrost. 2004, 62, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wiles, J.A.; Grzybowski, B.A.; Winkleman, A.; Whitesides, G.M. A Tool for Studying Contact Electrification in Systems Comprising Metals and Insulating Polymers. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4859–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. McCarty, L.S.; Whitesides, G.M. Electrostatic Charging Due to Separation of Ions Interfaces: Contact. Electrification of Ionic Electrets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2188–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and fabricated design of the hybridized nanogenerator (NG): (a) rotor part of the electromagnetic generator (EMG); (b) stator part of the EMG; (c) rotor part of the triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG); and (d) stator part of the TENG. FEP: fluorinated ethylene propylene.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and fabricated design of the hybridized nanogenerator (NG): (a) rotor part of the electromagnetic generator (EMG); (b) stator part of the EMG; (c) rotor part of the triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG); and (d) stator part of the TENG. FEP: fluorinated ethylene propylene.
Energies 12 01774 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustrations: (a) a thermomagnetic engine; and (b) a thermomagnetic engine with gears and shaft for power transmission.
Figure 2. Schematic illustrations: (a) a thermomagnetic engine; and (b) a thermomagnetic engine with gears and shaft for power transmission.
Energies 12 01774 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the hybrid NG: (a) schematic diagram of the rotor part of the hybrid NG; and (b) schematic diagram of the stator part of the hybrid NG.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the hybrid NG: (a) schematic diagram of the rotor part of the hybrid NG; and (b) schematic diagram of the stator part of the hybrid NG.
Energies 12 01774 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the working mechanism of the TENG based on the rotation of the FEP on the aluminum electrodes.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the working mechanism of the TENG based on the rotation of the FEP on the aluminum electrodes.
Energies 12 01774 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the integrated thermomagnetic engine with the hybrid (TENG-EMG) generator: (a) cross sectional view of the system; and (b) isometric view of the system.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the integrated thermomagnetic engine with the hybrid (TENG-EMG) generator: (a) cross sectional view of the system; and (b) isometric view of the system.
Energies 12 01774 g005aEnergies 12 01774 g005b
Figure 6. Fabricated model of the integrated thermomagnetic engine with the hybrid (TENG-EMG).
Figure 6. Fabricated model of the integrated thermomagnetic engine with the hybrid (TENG-EMG).
Energies 12 01774 g006
Figure 7. Temperature difference between hot and cold water jets vs. the rotational speed (rpm) of the thermomagnetic engine.
Figure 7. Temperature difference between hot and cold water jets vs. the rotational speed (rpm) of the thermomagnetic engine.
Energies 12 01774 g007
Figure 8. Open circuit voltage analysis of the TENG at a speed of 251 rpm and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Figure 8. Open circuit voltage analysis of the TENG at a speed of 251 rpm and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Energies 12 01774 g008
Figure 9. Short circuit analysis of the TENG at a speed of 251 rpm, and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Figure 9. Short circuit analysis of the TENG at a speed of 251 rpm, and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Energies 12 01774 g009
Figure 10. Open circuit voltage analysis of the EMG at a speed of 251 rpm and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Figure 10. Open circuit voltage analysis of the EMG at a speed of 251 rpm and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Energies 12 01774 g010
Figure 11. Short circuit analysis of the EMG at a speed of 251 rpm and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Figure 11. Short circuit analysis of the EMG at a speed of 251 rpm and a temperature difference of 45 °C.
Energies 12 01774 g011
Figure 12. Relationship between the output power/current and the loading resistance: (a) TENG; and (b) EMG.
Figure 12. Relationship between the output power/current and the loading resistance: (a) TENG; and (b) EMG.
Energies 12 01774 g012
Figure 13. (a) The dimensions and the gap distance between the rotor and stator; (b) relationship between the gap distance and output voltage for the TENG; and (c) relationship between the gap distance and output voltage for the EMG.
Figure 13. (a) The dimensions and the gap distance between the rotor and stator; (b) relationship between the gap distance and output voltage for the TENG; and (c) relationship between the gap distance and output voltage for the EMG.
Energies 12 01774 g013
Figure 14. Measured electrical power output on different load resistances at a rotational speed of 251 rpm and temperature difference of 45 °C.
Figure 14. Measured electrical power output on different load resistances at a rotational speed of 251 rpm and temperature difference of 45 °C.
Energies 12 01774 g014
Figure 15. Circuit diagram of the connection mechanism of TENG and EMG.
Figure 15. Circuit diagram of the connection mechanism of TENG and EMG.
Energies 12 01774 g015
Figure 16. Combined (TENG-EMG) open circuit voltage analysis at the speed of 251 rpm.
Figure 16. Combined (TENG-EMG) open circuit voltage analysis at the speed of 251 rpm.
Energies 12 01774 g016
Figure 17. Combined (TENG-EMG) short circuit analysis at a rotational speed of 251 rpm.
Figure 17. Combined (TENG-EMG) short circuit analysis at a rotational speed of 251 rpm.
Energies 12 01774 g017
Figure 18. Mechanical power of the system delivered by the thermomagnetic engine at various temperature differences between hot and cold water jets.
Figure 18. Mechanical power of the system delivered by the thermomagnetic engine at various temperature differences between hot and cold water jets.
Energies 12 01774 g018

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeeshan; Ahmed, R.; Chun, W.; Oh, S.J.; Kim, Y. Power Generation from a Hybrid Generator (TENG-EMG) Run by a Thermomagnetic Engine Harnessing Low Temperature Waste Heat. Energies 2019, 12, 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091774

AMA Style

Zeeshan, Ahmed R, Chun W, Oh SJ, Kim Y. Power Generation from a Hybrid Generator (TENG-EMG) Run by a Thermomagnetic Engine Harnessing Low Temperature Waste Heat. Energies. 2019; 12(9):1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeeshan, Rahate Ahmed, Wongee Chun, Seung Jin Oh, and Yeongmin Kim. 2019. "Power Generation from a Hybrid Generator (TENG-EMG) Run by a Thermomagnetic Engine Harnessing Low Temperature Waste Heat" Energies 12, no. 9: 1774. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091774

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop