# Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Literature Review

## 3. Modelling Framework

## 4. Analysis of Different Power Structures

**Lemma**

**1.**

**Lemma**

**2.**

**Lemma**

**3.**

## 5. Comparison

#### 5.1. Analytical Comparison of the Decisions and Performance

**Proposition**

**1.**

**Proposition**

**2.**

**Corollary**

**1.**

**Proposition**

**3.**

**Proposition**

**4.**

**Proposition**

**5.**

#### 5.2. Numerical Studies

## 6. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

**Proof**

**of**

**Lemma**

**1.**

**Proof**

**of**

**Lemma**

**2.**

**Proof**

**of**

**Lemma**

**3.**

**Proof**

**of**

**Proposition**

**1.**

**Proof**

**of**

**Proposition**

**2.**

**Proof**

**of**

**Proposition**

**3.**

**Proof**

**of**

**Proposition**

**4.**

**Proof**

**of**

**Proposition**

**5.**

## References

- Krass, D.; Nedorezov, T.; Ovchinnikov, A. Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology. Prod. Oper. Manag.
**2013**, 22, 1035–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Atasu, A.; Özdemir, Ö.; Van Wassenhove, L.N. Stakeholder perspectives under EWaste Take-Back legislation. Prod. Oper. Manag.
**2013**, 22, 382–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Drake, D.F.; Kleindorfer, P.R.; Van Wassenhove, L.N. Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Prod. Oper. Manag.
**2015**, 25, 1006–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shi, X.; Qian, Y.; Dong, C. Economic and environmental performance of fashion supply chain: The Joint effect of power structure and sustainable investment. Sustainability
**2017**, 9, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shen, B. Sustainable fashion supply chain: Lessons from H&M. Sustainability
**2014**, 6, 6236–6249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dong, C.; Shen, B.; Chow, P.S.; Yang, L.; Ng, C.T. Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Ann. Oper. Res.
**2016**, 240, 509–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Apple Environmental Responsibility Report 2017. Available online: https://images.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Responsibility_Report_2017.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2017).
- Marks&Spencer Plan A Report 2016. Available online: http://planareport.marksandspencer.com/M&S_PlanA_Report_2016.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2016).
- Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Chan, H. Manufacturer and retailer coordination for environmental and economic competitiveness: A power perspective. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.
**2017**, 97, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cheng, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Shi, X.; Dong, C. Sustainable investment in a supply chain in the big data era: An information updating approach. Sustainability
**2018**, 10, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Choi, T.M. Local sourcing and fashion quick response system: The impacts of carbon footprint tax. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.
**2013**, 55, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rosič, H.; Jammernegg, W. The economic and environmental performance of dual sourcing: A newsvendor approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**2013**, 143, 109–119. [Google Scholar][Green Version] - Niu, B.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J. Punishing or subsidizing? Regulation analysis of sustainable fashion procurement strategies. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.
**2017**, 107, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shen, B.; Li, Q. Impacts of returning unsold products in retail outsourcing fashion supply chain: A sustainability analysis. Sustainability
**2015**, 7, 1172–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guo, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhang, D.; Yang, J. Green supplier evaluation and selection in apparel manufacturing using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sustainability
**2017**, 9, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - He, Z.; Chen, P.; Liu, H.; Guo, Z. Performance measurement system and strategies for developing low-carbon logistics: A case study in China. J. Clean. Prod.
**2017**, 156, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Benjaafar, S.; Li, Y.; Daskin, M. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng.
**2013**, 10, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Toptal, A.; Özlü, H.; Konur, D. Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations. Int. J. Prod. Res.
**2014**, 52, 243–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Yalabik, B.; Fairchild, R.J. Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
**2011**, 131, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, Z.L.; Anderson, T.D.; Cruz, J.M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**2012**, 218, 602–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jaber, M.Y.; Glock, C.H.; El Saadany, A.M. Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives. Int. J. Prod. Res.
**2013**, 51, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; You, J. Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**2015**, 241, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Du, S.; Zhu, J.; Jiao, H.; Ye, W. Game-theoretical analysis for supply chain with consumer preference to low carbon. Int. J. Prod. Res.
**2015**, 53, 3753–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Q.; Shen, B. Sustainable design operations in the supply chain: Non-profit manufacturer vs. for-profit manufacturer. Sustainability
**2016**, 8, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Anupindi, R.; Bassok, Y. Centralization of stocks: Retailers vs. manufacturer. Manag. Sci.
**1999**, 45, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Iyer, G.; Villas-Boas, J.M. A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Mark. Res.
**2003**, 40, 80–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dukes, A.J.; Geylani, T.; Srinivasan, K. Strategic assortment reduction by a dominant retailer. Mark. Sci.
**2009**, 28, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Choi, S.C. Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer. Mark. Sci.
**1991**, 10, 271–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ertek, G.; Griffin, P.M. Supplier-and buyer-driven channels in a two-stage supply chain. IIE Trans.
**2002**, 34, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, X.; Wang, X. Free or bundled: Channel selection decisions under different power structures. Omega
**2015**, 53, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Luo, Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**2017**, 259, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shi, R.; Zhang, J.; Ru, J. Impacts of power structure on supply chains with uncertain demand. Prod. Oper. Manag.
**2013**, 22, 1232–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shen, B.; Choi, T.M.; Chan, H.L. Selling green first or not? A Bayesian analysis with service levels and environmental impact considerations in the Big Data Era. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
**2017**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chan, H.L.; Shen, B.; Cai, Y. Quick response strategy with cleaner technology in a supply chain: Coordination and win-win situation analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res.
**2017**, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Iyer, A.V.; Bergen, M.E. Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Manag. Sci.
**1997**, 43, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 2.**Impact of the average market size on the (

**left**) manufacturer’s profits and (

**right**) emission reduction in different power structures.

**Figure 3.**Impact of the consumer environmental awareness on the (

**left**) manufacturer’s profits and (

**right**) emission reduction in different power structures.

**Figure 4.**Impact of the sustainable investment cost on the (

**left**) manufacturer’s profits and (

**right**) emission reduction in different power structures.

**Figure 5.**Impact of the environmental tax savings on the (

**left**) manufacturer’s profits and (

**right**) emission reduction in different power structures.

Papers | Carbon Emission | Sustainable Investment Decision | Consumer Environmental Awareness | Power Structure | Stochastic Demand |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Choi [11], Shen and Li [14], Shen et al. [33] | √ | √ | |||

Chan et al. [34] | √ | √ | √ | ||

Li and Shen [24], Du et al. [23] | √ | √ | √ | ||

Zhang et al. [22] | √ | √ | √ | ||

Cheng et al. [10], Dong et al. [6] | √ | √ | √ | √ | |

Choi [28], Ertek and Griffin [29], Chen and Wang [30] | √ | ||||

Shi et al. [32] | √ | √ | |||

Chen et al. [9], Shi et al. [4] | √ | √ | √ | √ | |

This paper | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Shi, X.; Zhang, X.; Dong, C.; Wen, S. Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment. *Energies* **2018**, *11*, 983.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040983

**AMA Style**

Shi X, Zhang X, Dong C, Wen S. Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment. *Energies*. 2018; 11(4):983.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040983

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Shi, Xiutian, Xiaoli Zhang, Ciwei Dong, and Subin Wen. 2018. "Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment" *Energies* 11, no. 4: 983.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040983