Next Article in Journal
Big-Data-Based Thermal Runaway Prognosis of Battery Systems for Electric Vehicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Utilizing Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics and Reactive Transport to Model CH4 Production from the Nankai Trough Gas Hydrate Reservoir
Previous Article in Journal
Grid Synchronization of a Seven-Phase Wind Electric Generator Using d-q PLL
Previous Article in Special Issue
Natural Gas Hydrate as a Storage Mechanism for Safe, Sustainable and Economical Production from Offshore Petroleum Reserves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of Ecological CO2 Enrichment System for Greenhouse Production using TBAB + CO2 Semi-Clathrate Hydrate

1
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 5, 1-1-1, Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565, Japan
2
Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding, Co., Ltd., 16-1, Tamahara 3, Tamano, Okayama 706-0014, Japan
3
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-1 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8666, Japan
4
Graduate School of Environment, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba 274-8510, Japan
5
Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 73-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present address: College of Bioresource Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
Energies 2017, 10(7), 927; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070927
Submission received: 15 April 2017 / Revised: 1 June 2017 / Accepted: 29 June 2017 / Published: 4 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methane Hydrate Research and Development)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes an innovative CO2 enrichment system for crop production under a controlled greenhouse environment by means of tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (TBAB) + CO2 semi-clathrate hydrate (SC). In this system, CO2 is captured directly from exhaust gas from a combustion heater at night, which can be used for stimulating photosynthesis of crops in greenhouses during daytime. Although the gas capacity of TBAB + CO2 SC is less than that of CO2 gas hydrate, it is shown that TBAB + CO2 SC can store CO2 for CO2 enrichment in crop production even under moderate pressure conditions (<1.0 MPa) at 283 K.

1. Introduction

Sustainability of agriculture is a challenging subject because of future rapid global population increase [1]. Controlled environmental horticulture in a greenhouse is one of the most modern and sophisticated forms of horticulture systems for obtaining a high yield beyond the cultivation season in the field, by maintaining an optimum temperature in every stage of the crop [2]. However, temperature in the greenhouse without a heating system can fall below the optimum range for crops, especially during winter or nighttime, so an appropriate heating system is required to maintain the optimum temperature by means such as fossil-fuel combustion heating systems or heat pumps [3,4]. Thus, greenhouse horticulture leads to a rise in energy demand in the agricultural industry, which faces many difficulties, such as increased fuel cost [5,6] and the emission of greenhouse gases [7]. Therefore, the development of innovative technologies for production under a controlled greenhouse environment to establish a cost-effective, energy-effective, and environmentally-friendly greenhouse horticultural production system is of critical importance [8].
In greenhouse horticulture, carbon dioxide (CO2) enrichment is effective to promote photosynthesis and thereby increase crop yield and grower income [9,10]. A variety of CO2 enrichment systems have been studied using CO2 gas from a storage tank or exhaust gas of combustion heaters [11,12]. A biomass-based boiler system has also been developed recently, for which energetic efficiency is improved by reusing biomass from agricultural/industrial waste [13]. However, because of greenhouse air ventilation to prevent its overheating, CO2 is released from the greenhouse. CO2 concentration in the greenhouse decreases and cancels out the CO2 enrichment. Therefore, a cooling system to limit ventilation time [14,15] or a combustion-type CO2 enrichment system connected to heat pump has been studied [16]. Here again, the economic benefit depends on the balance between increase in crop value and the cost of introducing the CO2 enrichment system. For the above reasons, an innovative such system coupled with a greenhouse air-conditioning system based on a high-efficiency and low-cost cooling technique is desirable.
Owing to high CO2 gas capacity of CO2 gas hydrates, an application of CO2 gas hydrates to agriculture is proposed; i.e., usage of CO2 hydrate to increase CO2 concentration in culturing algae [17]. We also evaluated CO2 gas hydrates as cold energy and the source of CO2 for the greenhouse [18]. It is shown that CO2 gas supply capacity of the CO2 gas hydrate is sufficient to stably maintain high concentrations of CO2 for the stimulation of photosynthesis of tomato crops in greenhouses. CO2 gas hydrate can be used as a source of stored cold thermal energy to reduce the amount of electricity consumed, which contributes to partial removal of heat from greenhouses in combination with other innovative methods such as root zone cooling [19,20] or nocturnal cooling in summer. The drawback to this approach is that CO2 gas hydrate is formed under high-pressure and low-temperature conditions (e.g., >1.2 MPa at 273 K). It would be feasible to apply CO2 gas hydrate as unconventional media for CO2 transportation from industrial to agricultural areas [21], but it would not be feasible to form CO2 gas hydrate at sites of greenhouse horticulture.
In this paper, we propose a novel concept of a CO2 enrichment system for greenhouse production using semi-clathrate hydrate (hereafter SC). SC is formed under milder conditions (lower pressure and higher temperature) than CO2 gas hydrate, and greater economic benefit can be expected. In this system, at night, tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (TBAB) + CO2 SC is formed using CO2 gas supplied from the exhaust gas of a combustion (or biomass-based) heater. During daytime, CO2 gas and cold thermal energy from the dissociating SC is supplied in the greenhouse to stimulate crop photosynthesis.

2. Theoretical Background

TBAB is nontoxic and widely used as an ionic guest substance. Melting points of TBAB SC of ~285 K under atmospheric pressure are higher than those of gas hydrates and ice. Because TBAB SC forms a slurry that can be transported through a pipeline, SCs have been expected to be a new phase-change material [22,23]. In addition, SCs have been anticipated as a medium for gas storage and separation [24,25].

2.1. CO2 Gas Storage Using SC

Different SC structures form depending on the concentration of aqueous TBAB solution. The crystal structure of TBAB SC with hydration number 38 (TBAB·38H2O) was revealed [26] according to X-ray crystal structure analysis. The crystal structure of TBAB SC in Figure 1 shows that tetrakaidecahedral cages (51262) and pentakaidecahedral (51263) cages are occupied by tetra-n-butylammonium (TBA) cations, and anions (bromide; Br) form cage structures bonding to water molecules. There are also empty pentagonal dodecahedral (512) cages in the structure of TBAB SC. TBAB·36H2O hydrate is isostructural to the orthorhombic hydrate of TBAB·38H2O, but tetragonal hydrates of TBAB·32H2O and TBAB·26H2O have not been refined yet [27,28]. Crystal structures of gas hydrates are comparable with that of SC. Three main structural families of gas hydrate are known, and they form depending mainly on the size of the guest molecules. These three are cubic structure I (sI) and structure II (sII) hydrates and hexagonal structure H (sH) hydrate. Crystallographic data of each hydrate are summarized in Table 1.
Pure CO2 gas forms sI hydrate, in which CO2 is encaged in both 512 and 51262 cages. The CO2 hydrate contains about 150 volumes of CO2 gas per volume of hydrate crystal at standard temperature and pressure (150 V/V(STP)) [33]. Other structural gas hydrates of sII and sH also include CO2 in the presence of other guest molecules, such as tetrahydrofuran (THF) [34] or 3,3-dimethyl-2-butanone (pinacolone) [35]. Likewise, it is known that small molecules are selectively incorporated in TBAB SC, but large molecules such as ethane and propane are not [36]. It is shown that small molecules such as methane (CH4), nitrogen (N2), and CO2 are encaged into 512 cages during the formation of TBAB SC by 13C NMR [37], and their cage occupancies were determined by X-ray structure analysis [38,39,40].

2.2. Gas Separation Using SC

CO2 gas separation from combustion flue gas is feasible through the crystallization of SC and gas hydrates. When hydrate crystals form from a mixture of CO2 and other gases such as nitrogen (N2) or hydrogen (H2), the crystalline phase of SC or gas hydrate is enriched with CO2, while the concentration of the other gas is increased in the gas phase.
Generally, there are two types of hydrate formation promoters: chemical additives for gas hydrate that have no effect on structures of the water cages (e.g., tetrahydrofuran, cyclopentane, and anionic/non-ionic surfactants), and SC types such as TBA salts that form SC [24,25,41]. These additives reduce hydrate formation pressures. Equilibrium pressures of mixed-gas hydrate such as CO2 + N2 are between the respective dissociation pressures of CO2 and N2 hydrates. Equilibrium pressures of mixed-gas hydrates are also moderated by these hydrate formation promoters (Figure 2).

3. TBAB (+CO2 + N2) SC with Mixed Gas of CO2 + N2

In this study, we synthesized TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC samples using the same method as our previous paper [49]. To synthesize the SC samples, a high-pressure cell of 223 cm3 volume was charged with 30 g of an aqueous TBAB solution with 0.320 mass fraction for TBAB (>0.99 mass fraction, Sigma-Aldrich). The hydrate formation pressure and temperature was 1.0 MPa and 282.2 K, respectively. After the supply of aqueous solution, the reactor was sealed and vacuumed by a vacuum pump. Subsequently, it was charged and discharged with CO2 + N2 mixed gas with the aid of the vacuum pump. When residual air was removed, we supplied CO2 + N2 mixed gas (CO2/N2 = 0.151/0.849, Japan Fine Products) to the cell and started stirring for dissolution of the gas into liquid phase. For comparison, TBAB SC without CO2 + N2 gas was formed from an aqueous TBAB solution with w = 0.320 for TBAB at 283.1 K under atmospheric pressure, and grown for 17 h. Both samples were taken out from the cell after quenching at a temperature <220 K. Detailed procedures on SC formation and gas analysis are treated in our previous study [50].
During the formation of the TBAB + CO2 + N2 hydrate, an initial rapid pressure drop ended in two hours and no further pressure drop was observed over 40 h. The gas amount contained in the SC sample was calculated from the pressure drop during the formation process. There was 4.3 mmol of CO2 + N2 gas absorbed in the SC formed from 30 g of the aqueous TBAB solution. In the previous study [49], it was shown that CO2 is selectively captured in the SC, and the CO2 mole fraction in the SC phase was ~0.7 under the same experimental conditions as the present study. Thus, it is assumed that about 3 mmol of CO2 was contained in the TBAB + CO2 SC sample formed in this study.
To confirm the crystal structure of the sample formed under conditions of the proposed system, we carried out powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) measurements at 93 K to avoid leakage of CO2+N2 molecules in the SC sample under atmospheric pressure. Figure 3 shows PXRD patterns of TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC and that of TBAB SC formed without CO2 + N2 gas compression at the same temperature, for comparison. These two PXRD patterns do not show noteworthy diffraction peaks from hexagonal ice, which suggests that nearly all the TBAB solution transformed into the TBAB SC during its formation and after quenching for sampling. The obtained PXRD pattern of the TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC is consistent with that of the TBAB SC with orthorhombic Pmma phase [26]. This result agrees with our previous study of TBAB + CO2 (or CH4) SC [51]. Under substantial pressure of the gases, the TBAB solutions with w = 0.320 are likely to form the orthorhombic phase but not the tetragonal phase. However, the TBAB SC sample formed without CO2 + N2 gas was a mixture of the orthorhombic and other phases. It is unclear whether these structural differences are due to the occurrence of CO2 + N2 gas. It could be caused by a pressure–temperature effect or capture efficiency of gases, or it could be an extrinsic effect such as sample treatment after its synthesis. For further understanding of detailed crystallographic properties of TBAB SC, other studies from a physicochemical point of view are necessary. However, the fact that TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC were likely to form a pure orthorhombic structure is useful to estimate and assess its gas capacity within a crystalline structure from an application standpoint of the TBAB SC.
The CO2 gas amount contained in the SC sample was assessed by comparing crystallographic structure data. The total amount of CO2 gas contained in four different hydrate crystals (sI, sII, sH and SC) as a function of gas amount encaged into 512 cage (so-called cage occupancy) were simulated based on their crystal structures (Figure 4). The total amount of gas in the TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC sample in this study is also plotted in this figure. Then, the overall apparent cage occupancy of 512 cage (~0.15) was estimated. Other results based on cage occupancies determined by X-ray structure analysis [33,34,38] are plotted for comparison. Figure 4 suggests the possibility of forming greater gas occupation in the TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC sample, which could be achieved by improving the formation process of the SC sample.
The CO2 gas capacity of sI hydrate was the greatest of the four hydrates (sI, sII, sH, and SC). However, the equilibrium pressure of CO2 (+ N2) hydrate formed from mixed gas of CO2 + N2 (CO2/N2 ~ 0.15/0.85) was >10 MPa as shown in Figure 2. Additionally, since the hydrate promoters such as THF are basically volatile and harmful, they are unsuitable for use in agricultural fields, and especially in closed greenhouses. Accordingly, we conclude that TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC is suitable for use in CO2 enrichment within a closed greenhouse.
Other materials such as activated carbon, zeolite, or porous materials have been investigated, toward the development of a CO2 capture technology based on adsorption [52]. Specifically, activated carbons or zeolites are also cost-effective candidate materials for CO2 storage. These have higher CO2 adsorption capacity than TBAB + CO2 SC, but also high humidity because of mist spraying for crop growth and yield, and wet exhaust gas generally reduces their capacity. Thus, overall assessment of the total system is required to evaluate and compare potentials of these media.

4. Design of CO2 Enrichment System Using SC

4.1. Operation Cycle of System

Performance of the TBAB + CO2 SC formation/dissociation cycle for CO2 enrichment depends on gas capacity in TBAB SC and thermal efficiency of the temperature cycle with alternate actions of hydrate formation and dissociation. Figure 5 conceptually illustrates the SC formation/dissociation cycle on a pressure-temperature plane together with the TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC phase equilibrium curve. Each process in the SC formation/dissociation cycle is described below.
During the night, exhaust gas of the combustion heater is trapped and cooled to near ambient temperature. Here, we can use cool energy of the environment as a supplement during the night. Pollutants such as NOx and SOx in the gas are washed out by a water scrubber. It is noteworthy that because the gas capture medium used in this system is a water-based material, a water-type scrubber can be used to clean the flue gas. The gas is compressed to 1.0 MPa or less to flow into TBAB solution within a formation reactor. Although equilibrium conditions of TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC are mild (<1.0 MPa at 283 K), supercooling of TBAB solution is generally necessary for nucleation. Thus, the TBAB solutions must be cooled to 280 K or lower for SC nucleation. Once SC nucleation occurs, temperature is set to near the equilibrium temperature for slow SC growth.
During the day, the temperature controller ceases operation and the temperature of the reactor warms to the ambient temperature above the equilibrium point of SC hydrate, and CO2 + N2 gas automatically emerges for CO2 enrichment. At the same time, because the SC dissociation is an endothermic reaction, cold heat may be obtained and used to cool parts of the greenhouse. After completion of TBAB SC dissociation, reactor conditions are reset to the initial state.

4.2. Configuration of CO2 Enrichment System Using TBAB + CO2 SC

Figure 6a is a conceptual process diagram of the proposed system, which is composed of three sections. The first is a conventional combustion heater to heat the greenhouse. The heater is connected to the second section of the water scrubber system and compressor for outflow of exhaust gas. The third section is a TBAB SC reactor with a temperature control unit.
As shown in Figure 6b, CO2 gas supply from the storage tank has been widely used for CO2 enrichment. In this case, some CO2 gas is released to the atmosphere during daytime. Additionally, exhaust gas from the heater for greenhouse heating is released during nighttime. However, the advantage of the present system is that it is not necessary to provide CO2 gas from a storage tank, and exhaust gas can be used for the stimulation of photosynthesis of crops in greenhouses. From carbon balance estimates, the environmental benefit of the proposed system is to remove the CO2 emissions of a combustion heater. This then becomes a low-cost and environmentally friendly CO2 enrichment and heating/cooling system. Moreover, the proposed temporally varying process can achieve additional economic benefits when balanced against the conventional heat pump system for daytime cooling.

4.3. Quantitative Evaluation of CO2 Enrichment System Using TBAB + CO2 SC

We evaluated cultivation conditions of non-everbearing strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cultivars of Japanese “Tochiotome”. For a preliminary field study of the system in a greenhouse of 150 m2 in size, ~4.5 kg/day of CO2 is required. According to our results, 3 mmol of CO2 gas was absorbed in the SC formed from 30 g of aqueous TBAB solution due to SC formation. Thus, it is estimated that 0.004 kg/L of CO2 is captured by the TBAB solution with w = 0.32 mass fraction. That is 1125 L of TBAB solution and ~1500 L of a SC reactor needed for storing 4.5 kg of CO2. Our bench-scale test of TBAB + CO2 SC using a larger reactor (1000 cm3) with continuous gas flow showed similar or less CO2 capacity in the system [49].
It is necessary to control the CO2 enrichment system as follows. During nighttime (e.g., from 9 pm. to 6 am.), the greenhouse is heated to avoid temperature drop below 281 K. For example, the heating can be via a combustion heater (NEPON Inc., Model KA-125, Tokyo, Japan) that exhausts ~22.6 m3/h (STP) of flue gas containing 2.84 kg/h of CO2 caused by the combustion of kerosene. CO2 enrichment using the TBAB + CO2 SC system needs 4.5 kg of CO2 from this flue gas to provide sufficient CO2 to a 150-m2 field during the day, as noted above. The minimum performance for the CO2 capture rate in our system is 4.5 kg/9 h = ~0.5 kg/h on average, and that required for CO2 capture efficiency is ~0.18 (=0.5 kg/h/2.84 kg/h). Regardless of formation rate, this value was confirmed by our previous study [49], in which it was calculated at 0.16–0.29 from data with 1 MPa operation pressure. These values would be further improved by a practical process. Upon morning, temperature maintenance of the SC reactor is terminated and the temperature of the reactor is warmed to ambient temperature above the equilibrium point of SC hydrate to dissociate the SC and release the captured CO2. Using CO2 concentration monitors in the greenhouse, CO2 concentration is controlled in the range 700–1000 ppm, which is effective for the crops [10]. The suggested temporally varying CO2 enrichment is promising for enhancing energy efficiency; i.e., at night, there is heating and CO2 storage from a flue gas, and in daytime there is CO2 release and enrichment.
The system proposed herein is still being upgraded. However, it can be expected that the CO2 condensation process from the flue gas before gas injection to the hydrate reactor may improve system CO2 gas capacity. Additionally, optimization of the formation temperature of TBAB + CO2 SC, a method for flue bubbling into the aqueous TBAB solution, or other parameters may promote kinetic hydrate formation (e.g., [53,54,55]). These procedures to improve the SC system will enable downsizing of the SC formation reactor. Further study based on bench-scale experiments in an agricultural field will be necessary to improve the concept for estimation of energy balance. This would also contribute to the reuse of CO2 gas from the heater exhaust gas for carbon capture and utilization technology.

5. Summary

In this paper, a new concept of CO2 enrichment system for crop production under a controlled greenhouse environment for horticulture was proposed, based on new and environmentally friendly tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (TBAB) + CO2 semi-clathrate hydrate (SC). The feasibility of this system was assessed based on experimentally obtained CO2 capacity in TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC formed at 1.0 MPa and 282.2 K. As a result, 0.004 kg/L of CO2 was obtained by SC formation from TBAB solution with w = 0.320 mass fraction of TBAB. There was 1125 L of TBAB solution and SC reactor of ~1500 L needed for CO2 enrichment for a typical greenhouse of 150-m2 size. It is anticipated that the CO2 condensation process from the flue gas before gas injection to the hydrate reactor will improve CO2 gas capacity of this system. Another additive or other parameters may promote kinetic hydrate formation. These processes to improve the SC system will enable downsizing of the SC formation reactor.
We specified requirements of the SC reactor with regard for the CO2 capture rate based on the CO2 enrichment process in the cultivation of a Japanese strawberry cultivar as a standard case. In this system, a CO2 storage tank is not necessary to provide CO2 gas, and exhaust gas is effectively and efficiently used for the stimulation of crop photosynthesis in greenhouses.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from research and development projects for application to the promotion of new policy in agriculture, forestry and fisheries, by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF).

Author Contributions

S. Takeya, S. Muromachi, T. Maekawa, Y. Yamamoto, H. Mimachi, T. Kinoshita, T. Murayama, H. Umeda, D.H. Ahn, Y. Iwasaki, K. Okaya and S. Matsuo conceived and designed the experiments; S. Takeya, S. Muromachi and H. Hashimoto performed the experiments; S. Takeya, S. Muromachi, H. Hashimoto and H. Mimachi analyzed the data; S. Muromachi, H. Hashimoto and T. Yamaguchi contributed materials; S. Takeya, S. Muromachi, H. Hashimoto and H. Umeda wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.G.; Matson, P.A.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002, 418, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sethi, V.P.; Sharma, S.K. Survey and evaluation of heating technologies for worldwide agricultural greenhouse applications. Sol. Energy 2008, 82, 832–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bartzanas, T.; Tchamitchian, M.; Kittas, C. Influence of the heating method on greenhouse microclimate and energy consumption. Biosyst. Eng. 2005, 91, 487–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tarnawski, V.R.; Leong, W.H.; Momose, T.; Hamada, Y. Analysis of ground source heat pumps with horizontal ground heat exchangers for northern Japan. Renew. Energy 2009, 34, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Woods, J.; Williams, A.; Hughes, J.K.; Black, M.; Murphy, R. Energy and the food system. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365, 2991–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vadiee, A.; Martin, V. Energy management in horticultural applications through the closed greenhouse concept, state of the art. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 5087–5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vermeulen, S.J.; Campbell, B.M.; Ingram, J.S.I. Climate change and food systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012, 37, 195–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cuce, E.; Harjunowibowo, D.; Cuce, P.M. Renewable and sustainable energy saving strategies for greenhouse systems: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 64, 34–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peet, M.M.; Willts, D.H. CO2 enrichment of greenhouse tomatoes using a closed-loop heat storage: Effects of cultivar and nitrogen. Sci. Hortic. 1984, 24, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mortensen, L.M. Review: CO2 enrichment in greenhouses. Crop responses. Sci. Hortic. 1987, 33, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chalabi, Z.S.; Biro, A.; Bailey, B.J.; Aikman, D.P.; Cockshull, K.E. Optimal control strategies for carbon dioxide enrichment in greenhouse tomato crops—Part 1: Using pure carbon dioxide. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 81, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chalabi, Z.S.; Biro, A.; Bailey, B.J.; Aikman, D.P.; Cockshull, K.E. Optimal control strategies for carbon dioxide enrichment in greenhouse tomato crops—Part II: Using the exhaust gases of natural gas fired boilers. Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 81, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sanchez-Molina, J.A.; Reinoso, J.V.; Acien, F.G.; Rodriguez, F.; Lopez, J.C. Development of a biomass-based system for nocturnal temperature and diurnal CO2 concentration control in greenhouses. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 67, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Heuvelink, E.; Bakker, M.; Marcelis, L.F.M.; Raaphorst, M. Climate and yield in a closed greenhouse. Acta Hort. 2008, 801, 1083–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qian, T.; Dieleman, J.A.; Elings, A.; De Gelder, A.; Marcelis, L.F.M.; Van Kooten, O. Comparison of climate and production in closed, semi-closed and open greenhouses. Acta Hort. 2011, 893, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, S.H.; Lee, C.G.; Ashtiani-Araghi, A.; Kim, J.Y.; Rhee, J.Y. Development and evaluation of combustion-type CO2 enrichment system connected to heat pump for greenhouses. Eng. Agric. Environ. Food 2014, 7, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nakano, S.; Chang, K.H.; Shijima, A.; Miyamoto, H.; Sato, Y.; Noto, Y.; Ha, J.Y.; Sakamoto, M. A usage of CO2 hydrate: Convenient method to increase CO2 concentration in culturing algae. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 172, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Umeda, H.; Ahn, D.H.; Iwasaki, Y.; Matsuo, S.; Takeya, S. A cooling and CO2 enrichment system for greenhouse production using CO2 clathrate hydrate. Eng. Agric. Environ. Food 2015, 8, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sakamoto, M.; Uenishi, M.; Miyamoto, K.; Suzuki, T. Effect of root-zone temperature on the growth and fruit quality of hydroponically grown strawberry plants. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 8, 1916–9760. [Google Scholar]
  20. Llorach-Massana, P.; Pena, J.; Rieradevall, J.; Montero, J.I. Analysis of the technical, environmental and economic potential of phase change materials (PCM) for root zone heating in Mediterranean greenhouses. Renew. Energy 2017, 103, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matsuo, S.; Umeda, H.; Takeya, S.; Fujita, T. A feasibility study on hydrate-based technology for transporting CO2 from industrial to agricultural areas. Energies 2017, 10, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, P.; Ma, Z.W.; Wang, R.Z. An overview of phase change material slurries: MPCS and CHS. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 598–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Castellani, B.; Morini, E.; Filipponi, M.; Nicolini, A.; Palombo, M.; Cotana, F.; Rossi, F. Clathrate hydrates for thermal energy storage in buildings: Overview of proper hydrate-forming compounds. Sustainability 2014, 6, 6815–6829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Babu, P.; Linga, P.; Kumar, R.; Englezos, P. A review of the hydrate based gas separation (HBGS) process for carbon dioxide pre-combustion capture. Energy 2015, 85, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, Z.W.; Zhang, P.; Bao, H.S.; Deng, S. Review of fundamental properties of CO2 hydrates and CO2 capture and separation using hydration method. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 1273–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shimada, W.; Shiro, M.; Kondo, H.; Takeya, S.; Oyama, H.; Ebinuma, T.; Narita, H. Tetra-n-butylammonium bromide–water (1/38). Acta Cryst. 2005, 61, o65–o66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rodionova, T.V.; Komarov, V.Y.; Villevald, G.V.; Karpova, T.D.; Kuratieva, N.V.; Manakov, A.Y. Calorimetric and structural studies of tetrabutylammonium bromide ionic clathrate hydrates. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 10677–10685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chazallon, B.; Ziskind, M.; Carpentier, Y.; Focsa, C. CO2 capture using semi-clathrates of quaternary ammonium salt: Structure change induced by CO2 and N2 enclathration. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 13440–13452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kang, S.P.; Lee, H.; Ryu, B.J. Enthalpies of dissociation of clathrate hydrates of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, (carbon dioxide + nitrogen), and (carbon dioxide + nitrogen + tetrahydrofuran). J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2001, 33, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delahaye, A.; Fournaison, L.; Marinhas, S.; Chatti, I.; Petitet, J.P.; Dalmazzone, D.; Furst, W. Effect of THF on equilibrium pressure and dissociation enthalpy of CO2 hydrates applied to secondary refrigeration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, Y.; Lee, D.; Lee, J.W.; Seo, Y. Enclathration of CO2 as a co-guest of structure H hydrates and its implications for CO2 capture and sequestration. Appl. Eng. 2016, 163, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, W.; Delahaye, A.; Fournaison, L. Phase equilibrium and dissociation enthalpy for semi-clathrate hydrate of CO2 +TBAB. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2008, 264, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Udachin, K.A.; Ratcliffe, C.I.; Ripmeester, J.A. Structure, composition, and thermal expansion of CO2 hydrate from single crystal X-ray diffraction measurements. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 4200–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moudrakovski, I.L.; Udachin, K.A.; Alavi, S.; Ratcliffe, C.I.; Ripmeester, J.A. Facilitating guest transport in clathrate hydrates by tuning guest-host interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 074705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tezuka, K.; Shen, R.; Watanabe, T.; Takeya, S.; Alavi, S.; Ripmeester, J.A.; Ohmura, R. Synthesis and characterization of a structure H hydrate formed with carbon dioxide and 3,3-dimethyl-2-butanone. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 505–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kamata, Y.; Oyama, H.; Shimada, W.; Ebinuma, T.; Takeya, S.; Uchida, T.; Nagao, J.; Narita, H. Gas separation method using tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide semi-clathrate hydrate. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, 362–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, S.; Park, S.; Lee, Y.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.; Seo, Y. Guest gas enclathration in semiclathrates of tetra-n-butylammonium bromide: Stability condition and spectroscopic analysis. Langmuir 2011, 27, 10597–10603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Muromachi, S.; Udachin, K.A.; Shin, K.; Alavi, S.; Moudrakovski, I.L.; Ohmura, R.; Ripmeester, J.A. Guest-induced symmetry lowering of an ionic clathrate material for carbon capture. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11476–11479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Muromachi, S.; Hashimoto, H.; Maekawa, T.; Takeya, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Phase equilibrium and characterization of ionic clathrate hydrates formed with tetra-n-butylammonium bromide and nitrogen gas. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2016, 413, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Muromachi, S.; Udachin, K.A.; Alavi, S.; Ohmura, R.; Ripmeester, J.A. Selective occupancy of methane by cage symmetry in TBAB ionic clathrate hydrate. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 5621–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Duc, N.H.; Chauvy, F.; Herri, J.M. CO2 capture by hydrate crystallization—A potential solution for gas emission of steelmaking industry. Energy Convers. Manag. 2007, 48, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Adisasmito, S.; Frank, R.J., III; Sloan, E.D. Hydrates of carbon dioxide and methane mixtures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1991, 36, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.; Seo, Y. Structure identification and dissociation enthalpy measurements of the CO2 + N2 hydrates for their application to CO2 capture and storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 246, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jhaveri, J.; Robinson, D.B. Hydrates in the methane-nitrogen system. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 1965, 43, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ye, N.; Zhang, P. Equilibrium data and morphology of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide semiclathrate hydrate with carbon dioxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2012, 57, 1557–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohammadi, A.H.; Eslamimanesh, A.; Belandria, V.; Richon, D. Phase equilibria of semiclathrate hydrates of CO2, N2, CH4, or H2 + tetra-n-butylammonium bromide aqueous solution. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2011, 56, 3855–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohammadi, A.H.; Eslamimanesh, A.; Belandria, V.; Richon, D.; Naidoo, P.; Ramjugernath, D. Phase equilibrium measurements for semi-clathrate hydrates of the (CO2 + N2 + tetra-n-butylammonium bromide) aqueous solution system. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2012, 46, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deschamps, J.; Dalmazzone, D. Dissociation enthalpies and phase equilibrium for TBAB semi-clathrate hydrates of N2, CO2, N2 + CO2 and CH4 + CO2. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2009, 98, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hashimoto, H.; Yamaguchi, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Muromachi, S. Gas separation of flue gas by tetra-n-butylammonium bromide hydrates under moderate pressure conditions. Energy 2017, 129, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Muromachi, S.; Takeya, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ohmura, R. Characterization of tetra-n-butylphosphonium bromide semiclathrate hydrate by crystal structure analysis. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 2056–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Muromachi, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Takeya, S. Bulk phase behavior of tetra-n-butylammonium bromide hydrates formed with carbon dioxide or methane gas. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 1917–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sayaria, A.; Belmabkhouta, A.; Serna-Guerrero, R. Flue gas treatment via CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171, 760–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kumano, H.; Hirata, T.; Mitsuishi, K.; Ueno, K. Experimental study on effect of electric field on hydrate nucleation in supercooled tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide aqueous solution. Int. J. Refrig. 2012, 35, 1266–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Brinchi, L.; Castellani, B.; Rossi, F.; Cotana, F.; Morini, E.; Nicolini, A.; Filipponi, M. Experimental investigations on scaled-up methane hydrate production with surfactant promotion: Energy considerations. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2014, 120, 187–193. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mori, Y.H. Thermal resistances in stirred-tank and tubular reactors for clathrate-hydrate formation: Estimating their reactor-scale dependences. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017, 117, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Host structure of a semi-clathrate hydrate (SC) and gas hydrate. (a) Schematic representation of orthorhombic SC; and (b) polyhedral host cages in SC: 512 cage (dark gray), 51262 and 51263 cages occupied by a tetra-n-butylammonium (TBA) cation; (c) Schematic representation of sI hydrate; and (d) polyhedral host cages in sI hydrate: 512 cage (dark gray) and 51262 cage (light gray).
Figure 1. Host structure of a semi-clathrate hydrate (SC) and gas hydrate. (a) Schematic representation of orthorhombic SC; and (b) polyhedral host cages in SC: 512 cage (dark gray), 51262 and 51263 cages occupied by a tetra-n-butylammonium (TBA) cation; (c) Schematic representation of sI hydrate; and (d) polyhedral host cages in sI hydrate: 512 cage (dark gray) and 51262 cage (light gray).
Energies 10 00927 g001
Figure 2. Formation conditions of gas-containing semi-clathrate hydrates and gas hydrates [28,30,31,39,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Double circle represents formation condition in the present study. Here, w denotes mass fraction of promoters in aqueous phase. NH: neohexane; TBAB: tetra-n-butylammonium bromide; THF: tetrahydrofuran.
Figure 2. Formation conditions of gas-containing semi-clathrate hydrates and gas hydrates [28,30,31,39,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Double circle represents formation condition in the present study. Here, w denotes mass fraction of promoters in aqueous phase. NH: neohexane; TBAB: tetra-n-butylammonium bromide; THF: tetrahydrofuran.
Energies 10 00927 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of TBAB semi-clathrate hydrate (SC). Upper tick marks under powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) profile represent calculated peak locations for the SC and lower tick marks represent those for hexagonal ice. (a) TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC at 93 K; (b) TBAB SC without CO2 + N2 gas at 93 K; and (c) orthorhombic TBAB SC without CO2 + N2 gas simulation [26]. Asterisks (*) represent diffraction peaks other than orthorhombic phase.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of TBAB semi-clathrate hydrate (SC). Upper tick marks under powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) profile represent calculated peak locations for the SC and lower tick marks represent those for hexagonal ice. (a) TBAB + CO2 + N2 SC at 93 K; (b) TBAB SC without CO2 + N2 gas at 93 K; and (c) orthorhombic TBAB SC without CO2 + N2 gas simulation [26]. Asterisks (*) represent diffraction peaks other than orthorhombic phase.
Energies 10 00927 g003
Figure 4. Gas amount contained in semi-clathrate hydrate and gas hydrates as function of cage occupancy of 512 cage. Here, cage occupancy of 435663 cage in sH is assumed identical to that of 512 cage. Each circle represents experimentally obtained CO2 gas amount in hydrate crystals, and the result of this study represents the amount of CO2 + N2 (CO2/N2~0.7/0.3) gas.
Figure 4. Gas amount contained in semi-clathrate hydrate and gas hydrates as function of cage occupancy of 512 cage. Here, cage occupancy of 435663 cage in sH is assumed identical to that of 512 cage. Each circle represents experimentally obtained CO2 gas amount in hydrate crystals, and the result of this study represents the amount of CO2 + N2 (CO2/N2~0.7/0.3) gas.
Energies 10 00927 g004
Figure 5. Conceptual diagram of semi-clathrate hydrate cycle.
Figure 5. Conceptual diagram of semi-clathrate hydrate cycle.
Energies 10 00927 g005
Figure 6. Configuration of CO2 enrichment system, using (a) TBAB + CO2 SC and (b) CO2 gas from a tank.
Figure 6. Configuration of CO2 enrichment system, using (a) TBAB + CO2 SC and (b) CO2 gas from a tank.
Energies 10 00927 g006
Table 1. Crystallographic data of four types of clathrate hydrates.
Table 1. Crystallographic data of four types of clathrate hydrates.
StructureSpace GroupHydration NumberLattice Constant/ÅCage Type Number of CagesPromoterH/kJ mol−1
sICubic46a ≈ 12512/51262Non65 [29]
Pm3n2/6
sIICubic136a ≈ 17512/51264THF142 [30]
Fd-3m16/8
sH *Hexagonal34a ≈ 12512/435663/51268NH61 [31]
P6/mmmc ≈ 103/2/1
SCOrthorhombic76a ≈ 21512/51262/51263TBAB140 [32]
b ≈ 13
Pmmac ≈ 126/4/4
* sH hydrates necessarily form with two different guest substances; one is a large-molecule guest substance such as neohexane (NH), and the other is a small-molecule guest substance such as CH4.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takeya, S.; Muromachi, S.; Maekawa, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Mimachi, H.; Kinoshita, T.; Murayama, T.; Umeda, H.; Ahn, D.-H.; Iwasaki, Y.; et al. Design of Ecological CO2 Enrichment System for Greenhouse Production using TBAB + CO2 Semi-Clathrate Hydrate. Energies 2017, 10, 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070927

AMA Style

Takeya S, Muromachi S, Maekawa T, Yamamoto Y, Mimachi H, Kinoshita T, Murayama T, Umeda H, Ahn D-H, Iwasaki Y, et al. Design of Ecological CO2 Enrichment System for Greenhouse Production using TBAB + CO2 Semi-Clathrate Hydrate. Energies. 2017; 10(7):927. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070927

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takeya, Satoshi, Sanehiro Muromachi, Tatsuo Maekawa, Yoshitaka Yamamoto, Hiroko Mimachi, Takahiro Kinoshita, Tetsuro Murayama, Hiroki Umeda, Dong-Hyuk Ahn, Yasunaga Iwasaki, and et al. 2017. "Design of Ecological CO2 Enrichment System for Greenhouse Production using TBAB + CO2 Semi-Clathrate Hydrate" Energies 10, no. 7: 927. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070927

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop