Next Article in Journal
Condylar Fracture in a Child with Entrapment of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve
Previous Article in Journal
Osteogenesis Imperfecta Diagnosed from Mandibular and Lower Limb Fractures: A Case Report
 
 
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Sage.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Transorbital Orbitocranial Penetrating Injury with an Iron Rod

by
Amit Agrawal
1,*,
V. Umamaheswara Reddy
2,
S. Satish Kumar
3,
Kishor V. Hegde
2 and
G. Malleswara Rao
1
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
2
Department of Radiology, Narayana Medical College Hospital, Chinthareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, Narayana Medical College Hospital, Chinthareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9(2), 145-148; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551545 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 28 October 2014 / Revised: 31 January 2015 / Accepted: 31 January 2015 / Published: 21 May 2015

Abstract

:
Transorbital orbitocranial penetrating injuries (TOPIs) are relatively rare, can be caused by high-speed projectile foreign bodies to low-energy trauma (which is rarer), and account for 24% of penetrating head injuries in adults and approximately 45% in chilren. We report an uncommon nonfatal case of TOPI where a 16-year-old male child sustained injury due to accidental penetration of metal bar into the forehead. A bicoronal flap was raised to remove the metal bar. The patient recovered well, had normal vision, and doing well at follow-up.

Transorbital orbitocranial penetrating injuries (TOPIs) are relatively rare, have controversial management, and can be caused by several unusual objects. [1,2,3,4,5] These injuries account for 24% of penetrating head injuries in adults and approximately 45% in children.[6,7] TOPIs can be caused by high-speed projectile foreign bodies to low-energy trauma (which is rarer). [2] We report an uncommon nonfatal case of TOPI where child sustained injury due to accidental penetration of metal bar into the forehead.

Case Report

A 16-year-old male presented accidentally sustained injuries with an iron bar to his left orbit. The iron rod entered through the upper eyelid and was driven into the skull (Figure 1). There was no history of loss of consciousness, vomiting, or seizures. There was mild swelling and bruising around the entry wound. On neurological examination, his Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15/15 (E4M6V5). The right pupil was normal in size and reacting; the left pupil could not be tested. There were no motor or sensory deficits. His general and systemic examination was normal. Blood investigations were normal. Plain skull radiographs showed the bar crossing the skull from the left orbit to the anterior part of the frontal bone (Figure 2).
Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated that the bar was passing through the upper rim of the left orbit, through the frontal sinus (but not breaching the posterior wall of the frontal sinus), and coming out through the skull anteriorly from the frontal bone (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The underlying brain parenchyma could not be evaluated because of artifact. The patient was taken for emergency surgery. A bicoronal flap was raised and the frontal bone was exposed till supraorbital rim on left side. Protruding end of metal was exposed and it could be dislodged easily. During surgery, it was noted that the posterior wall of the frontal sinus was intact. This finding was noted on preoperative imaging as well. There was only small defect in the orbital plate of frontal bone. The supraorbital rim was intact without any obvious cosmetic deformity. There was no need for craniotomy. The patient recovered well. Vision and lid function was normal in left eye. Patient is doing well at follow-up (Figure 5).

Discussion

Orbital roof is relatively thinner part of the skull that can provide easy access to projectile objects, which can penetrate into cranial cavity and damaging the brain parenchyma, meninges, and vascular structures.[8,9,10,11,12,13,14] Unless the injuries are of high velocity, most of the patients with penetrating injuries are well preserved neurologically.[1,2,3,4,8,15,16] In most of the cases, penetrating wounds can easily be identified as the foreign bodies are easily visible or an entry wound can be seen.[1,17] All the imaging modalities including radiographs, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography have been investigated and the decision to select an imaging modality depends on the clinical suspicion and type of foreign body (metal, wood, etc.).[14,18,19,20] When a metallic foreign body is suspected (as it was obvious in our case), CT scan is the investigation of choice to determine the course of the foreign body and any associated intracranial damage.[18,19,20,21,22] If left untreated, these injuries can result in life-threatening intracranial complications which include brain abscess, meningitis, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, hemorrhage, neurological deficit, and subsequent high mortality.[14,23,24,25,26,27] In addition, many vascular complications (including hemorrhage, thrombosis, and occlusion) and ocular complications (including ocular laceration, retrobulbar hematoma, proptosis, and optic nerve damage) have been reported in the literature.[19,28,29] The goal of management is initial resuscitation, safe removal of offending foreign body, and any devitalized tissue.[2,11] Surgical management depends on the extent of intracranial- and intraorbital-associated injuries and associated complications.[5,14] The rule is to control persistent bleeding, minimize brain damage, and the removal of the metal object under direct visualization.[1,3,18] Depending on the entry wound and intracranial extension of the foreign object, a transorbital or transcranial approach can be selected.[1,2,27] The outcome of patients with TOPI depends on the extent of the damage to the neural and vascular structures and secondary complication particularly intracranial infection (i.e., meningitis).[3,9,14,24]

Conclusions

In summary, in case of TOPI, even a trivial looking external wound can be associated with extensive intracranial injury or injury to the internal vital vascular structures as well as infectious complications.[2,30] Also, in patients with TOPI, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score may not always reflect the severity of the injury, a high index of suspicion toward every case and an immediate CT are recommended.[2,3,31,32]

References

  1. Agrawal, A.; Pratap, A.; Agrawal, C.S.; Kumar, A.; Rupakheti, S. Transorbital orbitocranial penetrating injury due to bicycle brake handle in a child. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2007, 43, 498–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Paiva, W.S.; Saad, F.; Carvalhal, E.S.; De Amorim, R.L.O.; Figuereido, E.G.; Teeixera, M.J. Transorbital stab penetrating brain injury. Report of a case. Ann. Ital. Chir. 2009, 80, 463–465. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Huiszoon, W.B.; Noë, P.N.; Manten, A. Fatal transorbital penetrating intracranial injury caused by a bicycle hand brake. Int. J. Emerg. Med. 2012, 5, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdulbaki, A.; Al-Otaibi, F.; Almalki, A.; Alohaly, N.; Baeesa, S. Transorbital craniocerebral occult penetrating injury with cerebral abscess complication. Case Rep. Ophthalmol. Med. 2012, 2012, 742186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elia, M.D.; Gunel, M.; Servat, J.J.; Levin, F. Extraction of fronto-orbital shower hook through transcranial orbitotomy. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma. Reconstr. 2014, 7, 147–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kasamo, S.; Asakura, T.; Kusumoto, K.; et al. Transorbital penetrating brain injury [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1992, 20, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Yamaguchi, T.; Hata, H.; Hiratsuka, H.; Suganuma, Y.; Inaba, Y. Penetrating transorbital brain injury and intracranial foreign body (author’s transl) [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1978, 6, 179–184. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gopalakrishnan, M.S.; Indira Devi, B. Fatal penetrating orbitocerebral injury by bicycle brake handle. Indian. J. Neurotrauma 2007, 4, 123–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arslan, M.; Eseoğlu, M.; Güdü, B.O.; Demir, I. Transorbital orbitocranial penetrating injury caused by a metal bar. J. Neurosci. Rural. Pract. 2012, 3, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, W.H.; Chiang, Y.H.; Hsieh, C.T.; Sun, J.M.; Hsia, C.C. Transorbital penetrating brain injury by branchlet: A rare case. J. Emerg. Med. 2011, 41, 482–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kelly, D.F.; Nikas, D.L.; Becker, D.P. Diagnosis and treatment of moderate and severe head injuries in adults. Youmans Neurological Surgery. Sounder Company 1996, 3, 1678–1682. [Google Scholar]
  12. Satyarthee, G.D.; Borkar, S.A.; Tripathi, A.K.; Sharma, B.S. Transorbital penetrating cerebral injury with a ceramic stone: Report of an interesting case. Neurol. India 2009, 57, 331–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Balasubramanian, C.; Kaliaperumal, C.; Jadun, C.K.; Dias, P.S. Transorbital intracranial penetrating injury-an anatomical classification. Surg. Neurol. 2009, 71, 238–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Turbin, R.E.; Maxwell, D.N.; Langer, P.D.; et al. Patterns of transorbital intracranial injury: A review and comparison of occult and nonoccult cases. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2006, 51, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ahmad, F.U.; Suri, A.; Mahapatra, A.K. Fatal penetrating brainstem injury caused by bicycle brake handle. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2005, 41, 226–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chattopadhyay, S.; Sukul, B.; Das, S.K. Fatal transorbital head injury by bicycle brake handle. J. Forensic. Leg. Med. 2009, 16, 352–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seex, K.; Koppel, D.; Fitzpatrick, M.; Pyott, A. Trans-orbital penetrating head injury with a door key. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 1997, 25, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, H.L.; Lee, H.C.; Cho, D.Y. Management of transorbital brain injury. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2007, 70, 36–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Potapov, A.A.; Eropkin, S.V.; Kornienko, V.N.; et al. Late diagnosis and removal of a large wooden foreign body in the cranio-orbital region. J. Craniofac Surg. 1996, 7, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peterson, J.J.; Bancroft, L.W.; Kransdorf, M.J. Wooden foreign bodies: Imaging appearance. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002, 178, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hansen, J.E.; Gudeman, S.K.; Holgate, R.C.; Saunders, R.A. Penetrating intracranial wood wounds: Clinical limitations of computerized tomography. J. Neurosurg. 1988, 68, 752–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Park, S.H.; Cho, K.H.; Shin, Y.S.; et al. Penetrating craniofacial injuries in children with wooden and metal chopsticks. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 2006, 42, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bard, L.A.; Jarrett, W.H. Intracranial complications of penetrating orbital injuries. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1964, 71, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bursick, D.M.; Selker, R.G. Intracranial pencil injuries. Surg. Neurol. 1981, 16, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vandertop, W.P.; de Vries, W.B.; van Swieten, J.; Ramos, L.M. Recurrent brain abscess due to an unexpected foreign body. Surg. Neurol. 1992, 37, 39–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mirza, G.E.; Ekinciler, O.F.; Karaküçük, S. Diagnosis and management of a biorbital pencil injury. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993, 71, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Matsuyama, T.; Okuchi, K.; Nogami, K.; Hata, M.; Murao, Y. Transorbital penetrating injury by a chopstick—Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2001, 41, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kane, N.; Jamjoom, A.; Teimory, M. Penetrating orbitocranial injury. Injury 1991, 22, 326–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kitakami, A.; Kirikae, M.; Kuroda, K.; Ogawa, A. Transorbital-transpetrosal penetrating cerebellar injury—Case report. Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo) 1999, 39, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.G. Brain abscess related to metal fragments 47 years after head injury. Case report. J. Neurosurg. 2000, 93, 477–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Splavski, B.; Vranković, D.; Sarić, G.; et al. Early surgery and other indicators influencing the outcome of war missile skull base injuries. Surg. Neurol. 1998, 50, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Singh, A.; Bhasker, S.K.; Singh, B.K. Transorbital penetrating brain injury with a large foreign body. J. Ophthalmic. Vis. Res. 2013, 8, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Clinical photograph showing curved iron rod entering just below the left supraorbital ridge and the distal is protruding the over the left side of forehead with intact skin over it.
Figure 1. Clinical photograph showing curved iron rod entering just below the left supraorbital ridge and the distal is protruding the over the left side of forehead with intact skin over it.
Cmtr 09 9i145 g001
Figure 2. Radiograph of the skull lateral view showing the entry of the iron rod just below the orbital ridge and because of the “U” shape of the rod, it was apparently glided along the posterior wall of the frontal sinus and exited through the anterior frontal wall.
Figure 2. Radiograph of the skull lateral view showing the entry of the iron rod just below the orbital ridge and because of the “U” shape of the rod, it was apparently glided along the posterior wall of the frontal sinus and exited through the anterior frontal wall.
Cmtr 09 9i145 g002
Figure 3. (a–f) The radiographic findings were confirmed on CT scan and also it revealed that there were no intracranial injuries (please note the integrity of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus).
Figure 3. (a–f) The radiographic findings were confirmed on CT scan and also it revealed that there were no intracranial injuries (please note the integrity of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus).
Cmtr 09 9i145 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) Sagittal and volume rendered images showing greater details of the trajectory of the iron rod and confirming the integrity of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus.
Figure 4. (a,b) Sagittal and volume rendered images showing greater details of the trajectory of the iron rod and confirming the integrity of the posterior wall of the frontal sinus.
Cmtr 09 9i145 g004
Figure 5. Follow-up clinical photograph showing good cosmetic and functional results.
Figure 5. Follow-up clinical photograph showing good cosmetic and functional results.
Cmtr 09 9i145 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Agrawal, A.; Reddy, V.U.; Kumar, S.S.; Hegde, K.V.; Rao, G.M. Transorbital Orbitocranial Penetrating Injury with an Iron Rod. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2016, 9, 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551545

AMA Style

Agrawal A, Reddy VU, Kumar SS, Hegde KV, Rao GM. Transorbital Orbitocranial Penetrating Injury with an Iron Rod. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2016; 9(2):145-148. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551545

Chicago/Turabian Style

Agrawal, Amit, V. Umamaheswara Reddy, S. Satish Kumar, Kishor V. Hegde, and G. Malleswara Rao. 2016. "Transorbital Orbitocranial Penetrating Injury with an Iron Rod" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 9, no. 2: 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551545

APA Style

Agrawal, A., Reddy, V. U., Kumar, S. S., Hegde, K. V., & Rao, G. M. (2016). Transorbital Orbitocranial Penetrating Injury with an Iron Rod. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 9(2), 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551545

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop