Delayed Cranioplasty: Outcomes Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps
Abstract
:Patients and Methods
Statistical Methods
Results
Discussion
Author | Cranioplasties | Preservation method | Infection, % (n) | Resorption, % | Overall complication rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dry cryopreservation | |||||
Grossman et al[34] | 12 | CP −80°C, neomycin irrigation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Cheng et al[13] | 175 | CP no temp specified | 4.60% (8) | N/A | 15.4% |
Iwama et al[22] | 49 | CP −35 or −84°C | 2.00% (1) | 2.00% (1) | 4.10% |
Asano et al[15] | 46 | CP −40°C | 10.9% (5) | 15.2% (7) | 26.0% |
Lee et al[35] | 118 | CP −70°C | 5.90% (7) | N/A | N/A |
Schuss et al[36] | 280 | CP −80°C | N/A | N/A | 16.4% |
Lu et al[37] | 16 | CP −80°C | 0.00% | N/A | N/A |
Inamasu et al[26],a | 31 | CP −70°C | 16.1% (5) | N/A | N/A |
Sobani et al[38] | 65 | CP −27°C | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Wet cryopreservation | |||||
Nagayama et al[9] | 206 | CP −16°C + amikacin | 3.90% (8) | N/A | N/A |
Osawa et al[17] | 27 | CP −80°C + gentamicin/ amikacin sponge + autoclaved | 3.70% (1) | 7.40% (2) | 11.1% |
Prolo and Oklund[21] | 53 | CP −20°C or −70°C with bacitracin-soaked sponge | 3.80% (2) | 3.80% (2) | 9.40% |
Shimizu et al[39] | 39 | CP + DMSO | 2.60% (1) | 38.4% (15) | N/A |
Im et al[40] | 83 | CP −71°C +ethylene oxide gassterilization or hydrogen peroxide and alcohol soaks | 7.23% (6) | 19.4% (15) | N/A |
Matsuno et al[10] | 54 | CP −20°C with100% ethanol + autoclaved | 25.9% (14) | ||
SC | |||||
Häuptli, Segantini[28] | 42 | SC | 2.30% (1) | 4.70% (2) | N/A |
Inamasu et al[26],a | 39 | SC | 5.10% (2) | N/A | N/A |
Flannery and McConnell[23] | 12 | SC | 5.00% (1) | 0.00% | 5.00% |
Movassaghi et al[25] | 53 | SC | 3.80% (2) | N/A | N/A |
Morina et al[29] | 75 | SC | 2.67% (2) | N/A | 12.0% |
Not specified | |||||
Josan et al[41] | 16 | N/A | 12.5% (2) | N/A | N/A |
Manson et al[12] | 17 | N/A | 24.0% (4) | N/A | 29.0% |
Gooch et al[11] | 57 | N/A | N/A | 6.50% (4) | N/A |
Lee et al[42] | 91 | N/A | 5.50% (5) | N/A | 6.60% |
Tokoro et al[43] | 38 | N/A | 2.60% (1) | N/A | N/A |
Paşaoğlu et al[27] | 27 | N/A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Shoakazemi et al[24] | 89 | N/A | 5.60% (5) | 2.20% (2) | 24.0% |
Archavlis and Carvi Y Nievas[44] | 200 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 15.0% |
Moreira-Gonzalez et al[8] | 312 | N/A | 7.10% (22) | N/A | N/A |
De Bonis et al[45] | 135 | N/A | 8.90% (12) | 7.41% (10) | N/A |
Beauchamp et al[46] | 57 | N/A |
Conclusions
References
- Chibbaro, S.; Tacconi, L. Role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of severe head injury with refractory cerebral edema and intractable intracranial pressure. Our experience with 48 cases. Surg Neurol 2007, 68, 632–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aarabi, B.; Hesdorffer, D.C.; Ahn, E.S.; Aresco, C.; Scalea, T.M.; Eisenberg, H.M. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg 2006, 104, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Howard, J.L.; Cipolle, M.D.; Anderson, M.; et al. Outcome after decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2008, 65, 380–385, discussion 385–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artico, M.; Ferrante, L.; Pastore, F.S.; et al. Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2003, 60, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sultan, S.M.; Davidson, E.H.; Butala, P.; et al. Interval cranioplasty: comparison of current standards. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 127, 1855–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, V.; et al. Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg 2010, 112, 1120–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira-Gonzalez, A.; Jackson, I.T.; Miyawaki, T.; Barakat, K.; DiNick, V. Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg 2003, 14, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagayama, K.; Yoshikawa, G.; Somekawa, K.; et al. Cranioplasty using the patient’s autogenous bone preserved by freezing—an examination of post-operative infection rates. No Shinkei Geka 2002, 30, 165–169. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
- Matsuno, A.; Tanaka, H.; Iwamuro, H.; et al. Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006, 148, 535–540, discussion 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gooch, M.R.; Gin, G.E.; Kenning, T.J.; German, J.W. Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 2009, 26, E9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manson, P.N.; Crawley, W.A.; Hoopes, J.E. Frontal cranioplasty: risk factors and choice of cranial vault reconstructive material. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986, 77, 888–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.K.; Weng, H.H.; Yang, J.T.; Lee, M.H.; Wang, T.C.; Chang, C.N. Factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty. J Clin Neurosci 2008, 15, 1115–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, W.; Xiaofeng, Y.; Weiguo, L.; et al. Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 2007, 18, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asano, Y.; Ryuke, Y.; Hasuo, M.; Simosawa, S. Cranioplasty using cryopreserved autogenous bone [in Japanese]. No To Shinkei 1993, 45, 1145–1150. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Prolo, D.J.; Burres, K.P.; McLaughlin, W.T.; Christensen, A.H. Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response. Neurosurgery 1979, 4, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osawa, M.; Hara, H.; Ichinose, Y.; Koyama, T.; Kobayashi, S.; Sugita, Y. Cranioplasty with a frozen and autoclaved bone flap. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1990, 102, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhaskar, I.P.; Zaw, N.N.; Zheng, M.; Lee, G.Y. Bone flap storage following craniectomy: a survey of practices in major Australian neurosurgical centres. ANZ J Surg 2011, 81, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oh, J.H.; Zöller, J.E.; Kübler, A. A new bone banking technique to maintain osteoblast viability in frozen human iliac cancellous bone. Cryobiology 2002, 44, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reuther, T.; Kochel, M.; Mueller-Richter, U.; et al. Cryopreservation of autologous bone grafts: an experimental study on a sheep animal model. Cells Tissues Organs 2010, 191, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prolo, D.J.; Oklund, S.A. The use of bone grafts and alloplastic materials in cranioplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 268, 270–278. [Google Scholar]
- Iwama, T.; Yamada, J.; Imai, S.; Shinoda, J.; Funakoshi, T.; Sakai, N. The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited. Neurosurgery 2003, 52, 591–596, discussion 595–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flannery, T.; McConnell, R.S. Cranioplasty: why throw the bone flap out? Br J Neurosurg 2001, 15, 518–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shoakazemi, A.; Flannery, T.; McConnell, R.S. Long-term outcome of subcutaneously preserved autologous cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 2009, 65, 505–510, discussion 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Movassaghi, K.; Ver Halen, J.; Ganchi, P.; Amin-Hanjani, S.; Mesa, J.; Yaremchuk, M.J. Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 117, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inamasu, J.; Kuramae, T.; Nakatsukasa, M. Does difference in the storage method of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomy affect the incidence of surgical site infection after cranioplasty? Comparison between subcutaneous pocket and cryopreservation. J Trauma 2010, 68, 183–187, discussion 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paşaoğlu, A.; Kurtsoy, A.; Koc, R.K.; et al. Cranioplasty with bone flaps preserved under the scalp. Neurosurg Rev 1996, 19, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Häuptli, J.; Segantini, P. New tissue preservation method for bone flaps following decompressive craniotomy [in German]. Helv Chir Acta 1980, 47, 121–124. [Google Scholar]
- Morina, A.; Kelmendi, F.; Morina, Q.; et al. Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall-Experience with 75 cases in a post-war country Kosova. Surg Neurol Int 2011, 2, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yano, H.; Tanaka, K.; Matsuo, T.; Tsuda, M.; Akita, S.; Hirano, A. Cranioplasty with auto-purified bone flap after infection. J Craniofac Surg 2006, 17, 1076–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, J.; Forriol, F. Effects of preservation on the mechanical strength and chemical composition of cortical bone: an experimental study in sheep femora. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 2615–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zingale, A.; Albanese, V. Cryopreservation of autogeneous bone flap in cranial surgical practice: what is the future? A grade B and evidence level 4 meta-analytic study. J Neurosurg Sci 2003, 47, 137–139. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Yadla, S.; Campbell, P.G.; Chitale, R.; Maltenfort, M.G.; Jabbour, P.; Sharan, A.D. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 2011, 68, 1124–1129, discussion 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossman, N.; Shemesh-Jan, H.S.; Merkin, V.; Gideon, M.; Cohen, A. Deep-freeze preservation of cranial bones for future cranioplasty: nine years of experience in Soroka University Medical Center. Cell Tissue Bank 2007, 8, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, C.H.; Chung, Y.S.; Lee, S.H.; Yang, H.J.; Son, Y.J. Analysis of the factors influencing bone graft infection after cranioplasty. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012, 73, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuss, P.; Vatter, H.; Marquardt, G.; et al. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: the effect of timing on postoperative complications. J Neurotrauma 2012, 29, 1090–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Hui, G.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Gao, S. Survival and regeneration of deep-freeze preserved autologous cranial bones after cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 2012, 26, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sobani, Z.A.; Shamim, M.S.; Zafar, S.N.; et al. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: An institutional audit and analysis of factors related to complications. Surg Neurol Int 2011, 2, 123. [Google Scholar]
- Shimizu, S.; Morikawa, A.; Kuga, Y.; Mouri, G.; Murata, T. Cranioplasty using autogenous bone cryopreserved with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 2002, 30, 479–485. [Google Scholar]
- Im, S.H.; Jang, D.K.; Han, Y.M.; Kim, J.T.; Chung, D.S.; Park, Y.S. Long-term incidence and predicting factors of cranioplasty infection after decompressive craniectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012, 52, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Josan, V.A.; Sgouros, S.; Walsh, A.R.; Dover, M.S.; Nishikawa, H.; Hockley, A.D. Cranioplasty in children. Childs Nerv Syst 2005, 21, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.C.; Wu, C.T.; Lee, S.T.; Chen, P.J. Cranioplasty using polymethyl methacrylate prostheses. J Clin Neurosci 2009, 16, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tokoro, K.; Chiba, Y.; Tsubone, K. Late infection after cranioplasty— review of 14 cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1989, 29, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Archavlis, E.; Carvi YNievas, M. The impact of timing of cranioplasty in patients with large cranial defects after decompressive hemicraniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012, 154, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Bonis, P.; Frassanito, P.; Mangiola, A.; Nucci, C.G.; Anile, C.; Pompucci, A. Cranial repair: how complicated is filling a “hole”? J Neurotrauma 2012, 29, 1071–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beauchamp, K.M.; Kashuk, J.; Moore, E.E.; et al. Cranioplasty after postinjury decompressive craniectomy: is timing of the essence? J Trauma 2010, 69, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2014 by the author. The Author(s) 2014.
Share and Cite
Hng, D.; Bhaskar, I.; Khan, M.; Budgeon, C.; Damodaran, O.; Knuckey, N.; Lee, G. Delayed Cranioplasty: Outcomes Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2015, 8, 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395383
Hng D, Bhaskar I, Khan M, Budgeon C, Damodaran O, Knuckey N, Lee G. Delayed Cranioplasty: Outcomes Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2015; 8(3):190-197. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395383
Chicago/Turabian StyleHng, Daniel, Ivan Bhaskar, Mumtaz Khan, Charley Budgeon, Omprakash Damodaran, Neville Knuckey, and Gabriel Lee. 2015. "Delayed Cranioplasty: Outcomes Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 8, no. 3: 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395383
APA StyleHng, D., Bhaskar, I., Khan, M., Budgeon, C., Damodaran, O., Knuckey, N., & Lee, G. (2015). Delayed Cranioplasty: Outcomes Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 8(3), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395383