Next Article in Journal
Immediate Loading of One-Piece Implants in Conjunction with a Modified Technique of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Lateralization: 10 Years Follow-Up
Previous Article in Journal
The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Condylar Process Fractures—Level 3 Tutorial
 
 
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction is published by MDPI from Volume 18 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Sage.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Open Surgical Management of an Asymptomatic Giant Frontal Sinus Osteoma

by
Paolo Boffano
*,
Emanuele Zavattero
,
Fabio Roccia
and
Guglielmo Ramieri
Division of Maxillofacial Surgery, Head and Neck Department, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2014, 7(1), 51-54; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364200
Submission received: 23 February 2013 / Revised: 23 February 2013 / Accepted: 23 February 2013 / Published: 8 January 2014

Abstract

:
Osteomas are benign, slow-growing tumors that arise most frequently in the craniomaxillofacial region, and in particular in correspondence of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Osteomas may be asymptomatic for a long time until they cause deformation of the bone or compress adjacent structures. The treatment of osteomas of the frontal sinus may involve endoscopic approach or open approach. Although endoscopic treatment is the most common approach for frontal sinus osteomas, a coronal approach combined with the use of titanium mesh may still constitute a valuable option for the reconstruction of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus. This intervention is extremely important and delicate because the restoration of the integrity of the frontal sinus is crucial for its function. The purpose of this article is to present a case of frontal sinus osteoma that was treated by a coronal approach and a titanium mesh to restore frontal sinus contour.

Osteomas are benign, slow-growing tumors that arise most frequently in the craniomaxillofacial region, and in particular in correspondence of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Osteomas may be asymptomatic for a long time until they cause deformation of the bone or compress adjacent structures [1].
The treatment of osteomas of the frontal sinus may involve the reconstruction of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus. This intervention is extremely important and delicate because the restoration of the integrity of the frontal sinus is crucial for its function [2]. The restoration of bone contour after the resection of benign tumors of the frontal region may still represent a problem.
Several operative techniques and autogenous, allogenic, and implant biomaterials have been extensively used to restore the frontal contour [3,4]. The use of titanium mesh allows to restore great bony loss, being easy to shape and also sufficiently rigid to prevent displacement. The purpose of this article is to present a case of frontal sinus osteoma that was treated by a coronal approach and a titanium mesh to restore frontal sinus contour.

Case Report

A 53-year-old man with an unremarkable medical history was referred by his ophthalmologist for the management of a frontal sinus osteoma. Patient was asymptomatic (Figure 1). Computed tomographic (CT) scans showed that left frontal sinus was occupied by an osteoma that extended through the orbital roof in the left orbita (Figure 2). The nasofrontal duct appeared to be involved too.
The removal of the osteoma and the immediate reconstruction of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus by a titanium mesh were decided together with the patient. A reconstruction with autologous bone graft was proposed too, but the patient after a detailed informed consent preferred a reconstruction by titanium mesh. Surgical intervention was performed under general anesthesia.
A coronal flap was lifted. The osteotomy of the anterior wall was performed to visualize the frontal sinus osteoma (Figure 3) that was sectioned and removed (Figure 4). A Rains self-retaining Silastic stent was placed in correspondence of the nasofrontal duct to avoid a possible stenosis or obstruction and subsequent mucocele formation. Then, the frontal contour was reconstructed by a 0.3-mm-thick titanium mesh that was shaped with the aid of a template (Figure 5).
Closure of the flap was performed. Postoperative course was uneventful. The patient did not complain of pain or diplopia, and he showed neither paresthesia nor infection (Figure 6). The patient was clinically and radiologically monitored during the year after the surgery. Postoperative Ctscans confirmed an appropriate reconstruction of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus (Figure 7). This article was exempted from Institutional Review Board approval being a case report. We followed Helsinki Declaration guidelines.

Discussion

Paranasal sinuses osteomas are rare bony neoplasms that present different clinical presentations. The most frequent symptoms are headache and pain, though associated signs and symptoms depend on the location, size, and direction of tumor growth. In fact, neurologic disturbances may appear when compression of adjacent nerves is associated with the tumor [1].
CT scan is the gold standard for diagnosis and planning the surgical approach, whereas magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in cases with intracranial extension of the tumor [5]. Osteomas appear as radiopaque masses with well-defined borders. In this case, the intraorbital extension of the tumor was an important issue that was considered for the decision of the surgical intervention, though no symptoms because of compression of intraorbital were referred yet. In fact, the patient was not available for a strict follow-up with a serial imaging to determine if the mass could continue to grow. Therefore, he was willing to undergo a surgical intervention to remove the disease.
The differential diagnosis of this tumor should include other similar lesions of the bone, such as fibrous dysplasia, and ossifying fibroma. Furthermore, the presence of multiple osteomas associated with intestinal polyposis suggests the diagnosis of Gardner syndrome [6]. As aforementioned, surgical treatment is not suggested in most of the asymptomatic cases; rather, observation and radiologic follow-up of osteomas are advised because of their slow growth [7].
However, this case was considered an exception because of the already sizeable dimensions of the tumor and its intraorbital extension with the high risk of compression of orbital muscles or optic nerve.
Both open and endoscopic procedures produce good results. In the present case, an open coronal surgical approach was decided together with the removal of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus and the osteoma. Frontal sinus obliteration could be an option, but we preferred to preserve the function of frontal sinus by removing the osteoma and maintaining the patency of the nasofrontal duct, thanks to a stent (Figure 8).
Finally, the reconstruction of the frontal contour by the placement of a titanium mesh allowed an appropriate reestablishment of the involved region. Of course, another option could be represented by the use of autologous cranial bone, but the patient preferred not to have a donor site, in spite of a relatively low morbidity. Titanium mesh is particularly useful when restoration of frontal contour is needed after tumor resection, and it could represent a valid alternative to autologous reconstruction that still remains the gold standard (Figure 9) [8].
Titanium mesh systems present several advantages, such as excellent biocompatibility, easy handling and shaping, reasonable stability, and versatility [3,4,9]. Moreover, a minimal imaging artifact can be observed on magnetic resonance and CT imaging [3,10], and there is little concern that the mesh alone could be visible through the skin. An important issue associated with the use of titanium mesh is the low susceptibility to infection, even when in direct contact with paranasal sinuses, [4] that makes it an ideal material for frontal sinus restoration.
In conclusion, although endoscopic treatment is the most common approach for frontal sinus osteomas, a coronal approach combined with the use of titanium mesh may still constitute a valuable option, as it provides an excellent frontal contour. No complications were observed, confirming that this treatment option could be still considered in the treatment of frontal sinus osteomas.

References

  1. Boffano, P.; Roccia, F.; Campisi, P.; Gallesio, C. Review of 43 osteomas of the craniomaxillofacial region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012, 70, 1093–1095. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Gabrielli, M.F.; Gabrielli, M.A.; Hochuli-Vieira, E.; Pereira-Fillho, V.A. Immediate reconstruction of frontal sinus fractures: Review of 26 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004, 62, 582–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lakhani, R.S.; Shibuya, T.Y.; Mathog, R.H.; Marks, S.C.; Burgio, D.L.; Yoo, G.H. Titanium mesh repair of the severely comminuted frontal sinus fracture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001, 127, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kuttenberger, J.J.; Hardt, N. Long-term results following reconstruction of craniofacial defects with titanium micro-mesh systems. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001, 29, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Castelnuovo, P.; Valentini, V.; Giovannetti, F.; Bignami, M.; Cassoni, A.; Iannetti, G. Osteomas of the maxillofacial district: Endoscopic surgery versus open surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2008, 19, 1446–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boffano, P.; Bosco, G.F.; Gerbino, G. The surgical management of oral and maxillofacial manifestations of Gardner syndrome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010, 68, 2549–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Miman, M.C.; Bayindir, T.; Akarcay, M.; Erdem, T.; Selimoglu, E. Endoscopic removal technique of a huge ethmoido-orbital osteoma. J Craniofac Surg 2009, 20, 1403–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Manolidis, S.; Hollier, L.H., Jr. Management of frontal sinus fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 120 (Suppl. 2), 32S–48S. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Lazaridis, N.; Makos, C.; Iordanidis, S.; Zouloumis, L. The use of titanium mesh sheet in the fronto-zygomatico-orbital region. Case reports. Aust Dent J 1998, 43, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Corina, L.; Scarano, E.; Parrilla, C.; Almadori, G.; Paludetti, G. Use of titanium mesh in comminuted fractures of frontal sinus anterior wall. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2003, 23, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Preoperative view of the asymptomatic patient.
Figure 1. Preoperative view of the asymptomatic patient.
Cmtr 07 00013 g001
Figure 2. (A) Preoperative axial, (B) coronal, (C) and axial computed tomographic scans showing a left frontal sinus osteoma that extended through the orbital roof in the left orbita.
Figure 2. (A) Preoperative axial, (B) coronal, (C) and axial computed tomographic scans showing a left frontal sinus osteoma that extended through the orbital roof in the left orbita.
Cmtr 07 00013 g002
Figure 3. Intraoperative image showing the osteotomy of the anterior wall.
Figure 3. Intraoperative image showing the osteotomy of the anterior wall.
Cmtr 07 00013 g003
Figure 4. Intraoperative image of the left frontal sinus after the removal of the osteoma.
Figure 4. Intraoperative image of the left frontal sinus after the removal of the osteoma.
Cmtr 07 00013 g004
Figure 5. Intraoperative image showing the reconstruction of the frontal contour by a 0.3-mm-thick titanium mesh.
Figure 5. Intraoperative image showing the reconstruction of the frontal contour by a 0.3-mm-thick titanium mesh.
Cmtr 07 00013 g005
Figure 6. Postoperative view of the asymptomatic patient.
Figure 6. Postoperative view of the asymptomatic patient.
Cmtr 07 00013 g006
Figure 7. (A) Postoperative axial (B, C) and three-dimensional computed tomographic scans confirming an appropriate reconstruction of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus.
Figure 7. (A) Postoperative axial (B, C) and three-dimensional computed tomographic scans confirming an appropriate reconstruction of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus.
Cmtr 07 00013 g007
Figure 8. Image of the parts of the resection.
Figure 8. Image of the parts of the resection.
Cmtr 07 00013 g008
Figure 9. Image of the anterior wall reconstruction by mesh with the stent.
Figure 9. Image of the anterior wall reconstruction by mesh with the stent.
Cmtr 07 00013 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boffano, P.; Zavattero, E.; Roccia, F.; Ramieri, G. Open Surgical Management of an Asymptomatic Giant Frontal Sinus Osteoma. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 2014, 7, 51-54. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364200

AMA Style

Boffano P, Zavattero E, Roccia F, Ramieri G. Open Surgical Management of an Asymptomatic Giant Frontal Sinus Osteoma. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2014; 7(1):51-54. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boffano, Paolo, Emanuele Zavattero, Fabio Roccia, and Guglielmo Ramieri. 2014. "Open Surgical Management of an Asymptomatic Giant Frontal Sinus Osteoma" Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction 7, no. 1: 51-54. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364200

APA Style

Boffano, P., Zavattero, E., Roccia, F., & Ramieri, G. (2014). Open Surgical Management of an Asymptomatic Giant Frontal Sinus Osteoma. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction, 7(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364200

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop