Next Article in Journal
Institutional Motivations for Conversion from Public Sector Unit to a Social Business: The Case Study of Burgundy School of Business in France
Previous Article in Journal
Towards True Climate Neutrality for Global Aviation: A Negative Emissions Fund for Airlines
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JRFM
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/jrfm15110507
jrfm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Scientometric Study on Management Literature in Southeast Asia

by
Egi Arvian Firmansyah
1,*,
Hairunnizam Wahid
2,
Ardi Gunardi
3 and
Fahmi Ali Hudaefi
4,5
1
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
2
Center for Sustainable & Inclusive Development (SID), Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
3
Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pasundan, Bandung 40116, Indonesia
4
Institut Agama Islam Darussalam (IAID), Ciamis 46271, Indonesia
5
School of Business and Economics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan BE1410, Brunei
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15(11), 507; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15110507
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 30 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 2 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Business and Entrepreneurship)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study employs bibliometric analysis, i.e., a kind of data analytics for evaluating scholarly publications, to evaluate journal publishing management issues in the Southeast Asian context. A total of 500 Scopus-indexed documents from Jurnal Pengurusan were sampled. The finding reveals that Malaysia is the most prominent country in terms of author affiliation, country performance, and keyword appearance. The collaboration among the authors of the sampled journal is primarily from the Asian continent, with a few from Australia. The topics of this journal have incrementally evolved from conventional to contemporary issues. This journal has made substantial contributions to the subject of Islamic finance and business, which is congruent with Malaysia’s role as a global center of Islamic finance. In addition, some contemporary subjects, such as blockchain, metaverse, and fintech, have emerged, demonstrating the relevance of this journal coverage to the contemporary management issues occurring in the financial markets worldwide. This study provides a critical novelty in the assessment of scholarly publications on management issues in the Southeast Asian context with Jurnal Pengurusan as the case.

1. Introduction

Management is a combination of science and the art of getting things done through and with other people. Management comprises several functions, e.g., finance, human resources, operations, marketing, and information systems. Management research is prevalent along with the advancement of management practices in various fields and industries. The word ‘management’ is not solely in business but also in other sectors, such as health, education, and government. Along with the advancement of management practices, scholarly works on management issues have been produced in various publishing outlets, e.g., academic journals, books, conference proceedings, case studies, and others. Scientific journals are peer-reviewed, which makes them highly trusted in academia. Jurnal Pengurusan, which is published by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (also known as UKM Journal of Management), is one of the journals covering management issues in Southeast Asia. The first issue of the journal was published in 1982.
Jurnal Pengurusan publishes empirical and conceptual papers in business management, including human resources, managerial accounting, finance, banking, marketing, and entrepreneurship. It has been indexed by one of the world’s most reputable indexing bodies, i.e., Scopus, since 2006 (volume 25). Currently, the journal is in the third quartile (Q3) for the category of Business, Management, and Accounting (miscellaneous) in the Scopus database. Over the past decade, as shown in Figure 1, Jurnal Pengurusan had an increasing CiteScore tendency, with a slight decrease in 2021 (score 0.9). CiteScore is a journal performance matrix that indicates the average citations received per document published in the serial. The calculation of CiteScore is refined by Scopus, and the latest improvement was launched in 2020, allowing a preventive mechanism for a journal from using ineligible documents, such as editorial material, to manipulate the score (Fang 2021; Trapp 2020). The linear regression formula for Figure 1 is as Y = a + bX, with Y is the CiteScore and X is the year.
This study aims to evaluate the current state of management studies using a bibliometric approach of the sixteen debuts of Jurnal Pengurusan. Doing so is to better understand the management issues published in scholarly works in the Southeast Asian context, given that previous work has not dealt with this topic. The scholars pursuing to publish management studies or intending to study management may learn from the results of this study, primarily on the topics which are intensively researched and the lesser ones in a broader context of Asia.
This study aims to evaluate the current state of management studies using a bibliometric approach to Jurnal Pengurusan’s sixteen debuts. This is intended to provide a better understanding of the management issues published in academic papers in the Southeast Asian context, as previous papers have not addressed this critical research topic. This study may serve as the primary reference for those scholars who wish to study the current state of management issues in a specific Asian context.
The first section of this paper is the introduction, followed by the literature review in next section. The literature review explains the bibliometric approach, a type of research that can be used to better understand a particular topic or outlet. The literature review section is followed by the method and results and managerial implications. The final section is the conclusion of this study.

2. Literature Review

Bibliometrics or scientometrics, which is also practiced as a type of data analytics for evaluating scholarly publications (Hassan et al. 2022), can be understood as the use of quantitative investigation and statistics to research outputs such as journal articles and their citation sums (Reuters 2008). This technique has gained popularity in the past decade for performing comprehensive science mapping analyses (Aria and Cuccurullo 2017) and evaluating the performances of a journal (or several journals simultaneously), authors, affiliations, and countries.
There are several tools employed by researchers when conducting bibliometric analyses. These include VOSViewer (van Eck and Waltman 2010), SciMAT (see, for instance, de las Heras-Rosas and Herrera 2021) and the Bibliometrix package in RStudio (e.g., see; Alshater et al. 2021; Baz and Iddik 2022; Hassan et al. 2022; Taqi et al. 2021). These three main bibliometric software have their advantages and disadvantages. For example, VOSViewer can be used with no hassle since it is user-friendly. SciMAT offers unique modules which assist researchers in performing all science mapping workflow. Additionally,, its ability to clean raw bibliometric data is deemed advantageous (Cobo et al. 2012). The Bibliometrix package, through its biblioshiny app in RStudio, provides comprehensive features yet requires the users to have an essential background in coding or programming.
Bibliometric studies have been conducted in various disciplines with several variations. The focus may vary, such as on a specific journal, several journals, or many or any journals using a particular term or topic in various databases. Scopus and Web of Science are the most selected databases for bibliometric papers published by researchers in various fields of study. Additionally, these two databases are commonly used in systematic literature review studies (e.g., Firmansyah and Harsanto 2022; Gunardi et al. 2021; Thomas and Gupta 2021). Other works may also use different databases, such as SSRN, Crossref, and Google Scholar (e.g., Firmansyah et al. 2020).

3. Methods

This study purposefully sampled the bibliographic data of Jurnal Pengurusan publications automatically harvested from the Scopus database. The sample consists of 500 documents published from 2006 to 2021 (i.e., volume 25 to volume 63). The data retrieval was collected on 28 May 2022. The Scopus database was selected in this study because it is the one with the highest quality that indexes Jurnal Pengurusan. Additionally, the Scopus database has more advantages than the Web of Science because it has much more comprehensive coverage (Joshi 2016). Based on the website of Jurnal Pengurusan, which is based on an open journal system (OJS), other indexes that index Jurnal Pengurusan are the ASEAN Citation Index (ACI), Cabell, and MyCite. In addition, Jurnal Pengurusan was awarded The Best Malaysian Journal in 2019 by the Ministry of Education of Malaysia.
The obtained documents in this study were then processed using a bibliometric approach by utilizing RStudio software with the Bibliometrix package. Compared with the VOSviewer software, the Bibliometrix package in RStudio has gained popularity with bibliometric researchers because it has richer and more powerful features, primarily in the visualization aspect. The Bibliometrix package in RStudio has been used in previous recent studies in various fields, including in business, management, and economics settings (Abbas et al. 2022; Alshater et al. 2021; Bashar et al. 2022; Baz and Iddik 2022; Hassan et al. 2022; Ingale and Paluri 2022; Taqi et al. 2021; Thomas and Gupta 2021).

4. Results

The results of this study are discussed based on the modified adaptation from a previous study in one particular journal (Özdemir and Selçuk 2021). Thus, we present the results of this study in four sub-sections, namely, the descriptive results, the performances (author, affiliation, and country), research topics, and citation analysis.

4.1. Descriptive Results

4.1.1. Types and Quantity of Papers

Jurnal Pengurusan has three types of documents in its publication, i.e., journal article, review paper, and conference paper. Table 1 explains the statistics and types of documents published in Jurnal Pengurusan over sixteen years (2006 to 2021). The publication of Jurnal Pengurusan primarily features journal articles, followed by review papers, and only one publication of a conference paper.

4.1.2. Annual Publication Trend

In terms of the number of annual publications, Jurnal Pengurusan has varied yearly publications. Figure 2 illustrates that in the first five years (2006–2011), the number of publications increased slightly, with fewer than 20 papers per year, then jumped significantly to 39 documents in 2012. Since then, the steady trend has continued until 2016. The hike was then seen again in the year 2017 with 56 documents. The trend declined from 2017 until 2021. However, the tendency of document publication by Jurnal Pengurusan from 2006 to 2021 increased with an annual average growth of approximately 19%.

4.2. Author, Affiliation, Country, and Article Performances

4.2.1. Authors’ Productivity

The number authors in the 500 documents in Jurnal Pengurusan is recorded to be 971 authors. The top 20 authors are shown in Table 2, with Nor Asiah Omar (Omar NA) from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia as the leading author, publishing 14 documents. The second-ranked author is Rasidah Arshad (Arshad R), with 12 papers, also from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Both are associate professors with expertise in marketing and organizational behavior, respectively. The third-highest authors are Khairul Akmaliah Adham (Adam KA) from Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Mohd Helmi Ali (Ali MH) from Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Rosmah Mat Isa (Isa RM) from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fauzias Mat Nor (Nor FM) from Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, and Norman Mohd Saleh (Saleh NM) from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. These five authors’ names are each available in nine papers of the dataset in our study.

4.2.2. Affiliation’s Productivity

Most of the papers in Jurnal Pengurusan were authored by authors from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), totaling 303 papers, as shown in Table 1. Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), and Multimedia University are in the second, third, and fourth positions, respectively, far behind Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia in the first rank. The actual summation of the papers in Table 3 may exceed 500 documents because there are authors with multiple affiliations. Table 3 also indicates that the top 20 affiliations are dominated by Malaysia’s universities. Only one university that is not based in Malaysia, namely Universitas Airlangga from Indonesia, is ranked 16th, with five documents.

4.2.3. Corresponding Author’s Country and Total Citations

A document or research paper can be authored individually by a single author or collectively by a group (two or more authors). In line with Table 3 shown earlier, Figure 3 sheds evidence on the fact that most authors in Jurnal Pengurusan are affiliated with Malaysia’s institutions. It can be seen from the figure that most publications belong to a single-country publication category of Malaysia (in blue color). Only a few publications in Jurnal Pengurusan were jointly or collaboratively authored by researchers from Malaysia and other countries, as shown by the short bar chart line in red (multi-country publications). The second-largest authors with a single-country publication in Jurnal Pengurusan are from Indonesia, followed by Pakistani authors in the third position. Figure 3 also indicates that internationalization in terms of authorship in Jurnal Pengurusan still needs to be improved by inviting more authors from other countries to collaborate with Malaysian researchers.
In addition to being the most productive in producing articles, Malaysia is the country acquiring the most citations, with 1359. This rank is followed by Indonesia, India, and the United, with 89, 29, and 18 citations, respectively. The following Table 4 displays the top 10 countries with the most citations.

4.2.4. Country Collaboration Map

Figure 4 indicates that the collaboration among authors in Jurnal Pengurusan is mainly concentrated in the Asian continent, with several authors from Australia. This is understandable because the original name of the journal itself is in the Malay language, which might not be familiar to authors, for example, in the American continent. However, Jurnal Pengurusan has taken a progressive step by adding its name using the English language, i.e., UKM Journal of Management. Diversifying authorship can be conducted by collaborating with authors from the USA, Canada, and South American countries.

4.2.5. Article Performance

Articles that earn more citations can be considered to have more influence on the topic of those articles. Table 5 shows a list of the 10 most influential articles published by Jurnal Pengurusan from their citations and citations per year. An article by Abdullah and Ismail (2013) is deemed the most influential in Jurnal Pengurusan as it has the most citations (45 citations). This article reveals that ethnic diversity positively correlates with a firm financial performance, primarily ROA (Return on Asset). Their study indicates that diversity is something to encourage in z company’s boards.

4.3. Research Topics

4.3.1. Most Frequent Word

Figure 5 shows the 10 most frequent author keywords obtained from our dataset. The keyword ‘Malaysia’ is found to be the most frequent word, with 46 occurrences. It does make sense because Jurnal Pengurusan is published and managed by a Malaysian university. That is, most papers published in Jurnal Pengurusan discuss managerial issues in Malaysian contexts. For instance, the financial literacy of younger adult Malaysians (Chun et al. 2021), Malaysia’s SMEs (Thing et al. 2021), impulse buying behavior of Malaysian customers (Zaki and Ab Hamid 2021), case studies of Malaysian public universities (Hasbullah and Ab Rahman 2021), and Malaysia’s Islamic banking (Ab Hamid et al. 2021). In addition to being the highest in terms of number, the keyword ‘Malaysia’ has an increasing tendency within the sixteen-year debut of Jurnal Pengurusan.
The second largest term, in terms of size, is ‘corporate governance’, with 17 occurrences. It can be inferred that many researchers in Jurnal Pengurusan put significant attention on corporate governance. Some studies using this keyword deal with several themes, such as the positive association of corporate governance mechanisms with the environmental performance of Malaysian firms (Jaffar et al. 2018), the positive association of corporate governance with financial performance (Teh et al. 2016), and the corporate governance structures affecting voluntary disclosure in Indonesia (Jaffar et al. 2013).
The third keyword with the most occurrence is ‘Islamic banking’ (combined with Islamic banks), with 16 occurrences in total. It is interesting to note that even though Jurnal Pengurusan is not a specific Islamic economics or finance journal, it happens to publish several topics in this domain. The number of papers related to Islamic banking is quite large, discussing various topics, such as the determinants of Islamic bank’s brand image (Ab Hamid et al. 2021), CSR practice of Islamic banks (Mohd Nor and Hashim 2015), and risk management of Islamic banks (Aisyah and Zaid 2015). In addition, we found other papers related to other Islamic topics, such as takaful (e.g., Mohamed et al. 2016; Nizar and Falikhatun 2021; Shaladdin et al. 2018), with eight occurrences, and waqf, with five occurrences (e.g., Suhaili et al. 2018; Thaker and Thaker 2015; Usman and Rahman 2021). The presence of Islamic finance and business studies in Jurnal Pengurusan is in line with Malaysia, which is considered the world’s hub of Islamic finance, whose Islamic banking assets reached USD 297 billion in 2019 (Puri-Mirza 2021).

4.3.2. Trend Topics

A scientific journal tends to follow current trends on the practical side, and so does Jurnal Pengurusan. Figure 6 below illustrates various research topics obtained from the Bibliometrix package of the RStudio software. This figure provides several keywords which show a tendency over a couple of years. The keywords in the top positions are those which appeared in recent years, while those in the bottom position are those which appeared earlier. Meanwhile, the line in Figure 6 indicates the consistency of a particular keyword over the years. The longer the line of a term is, the more consistent (or popular) this topic among the researchers is. From that figure, it can be seen that the keywords or terms which appear in the more recent years include firm performance (including financial performance), risk management, job satisfaction, emerging market, and trust. The explanations of these keywords are outlined as follows.
The first current trend topic of all the documents in Jurnal Pengurusan, as shown in Figure 6, is ‘firm performance’. The study by Omar et al. (2016) is the first study in Jurnal Pengurusan that discusses the determinant of firm performance among SMEs in Malaysia. Their study found that the performance of SMEs is affected by entrepreneurial orientation, innovation capability, and knowledge creation. Subsequently, a study on firm performance was performed by Nor and Ismail (2017) and Abdullah and Shukor (2017). The study by Nor and Ismail (2017) is in the finance domain, positing that the firm performance of non-financial companies listed on Bursa Malaysia was affected by related party transactions (RTPs).
On the other hand, the focus of the firm performance study conducted by Abdullah and Shukor (2017) is on risk management, documenting that the risk management committee of a company may strengthen the relationship between voluntary risk management disclosure and firm performance. In 2018, no publication was found on firm performance. In 2019, one publication on firm performance was found, i.e., in the study by Marzuki and Shukri (2019) investigating Malaysia’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs). They revealed that firm performance is closely related to directors’ remuneration, indicating that incentives for directors work well in monitoring activities. Thus, the performances of these SOEs improved. In 2020, one study on firm performance was conducted by Khan et al. (2020), who employed a literature review to investigate the determinant of firm performance.
The next trending topic in Jurnal Pengurusan is studies using the keyword ‘trust’. Although the term ‘trust’ first appeared in a study published in 2011 (e.g., Al-Hawari 2011; Aman and Maelah 2011), this keyword started to gain popularity in 2019 and kept appearing until 2021, as shown in Figure 6. A recent study in Jurnal Pengurusan using the keyword ‘trust’ is related to the effect of trust on the purchase intention of pharmaceutical customers in Malaysia (Hodi and Hassan 2021). In their study, organizational trust was found to be significant in affecting individual behavior in the workplace. Furthermore, ‘trust’ is well-known in the context of marketing, especially its role as a mediating variable between the dependent and independent variables, as documented in several recent studies (Mabkhot et al. 2017; Maulod et al. 2020; Omar et al. 2017).
Furthermore, we found that the relatively consistent and relevant terms include ‘employee engagement, ‘human capital’, ‘waqf’, and ‘Malaysia’, as shown by the long blue line in Figure 6. This appearance indicates that those four words are quite popular among researchers in Jurnal Pengurusan, which may also be interpreted as that the topics in this field were gaining more attention from academia than any other topics. Meanwhile, the disappearing keywords include ‘Islamic bank’, ‘SMEs’, and ‘corporate governance’, as indicated by the short blue line in Figure 6. These terms are no longer available in the most recent publications of Jurnal Pengurusan, which may be interpreted as that the researchers have switched to other more interesting topics. However, those keywords might reappear in the forthcoming publication with perhaps different research methods or contexts, adding to the literature of those fields.
Finally, our results indicate that no studies in Jurnal Pengurusan publish papers on current digital topics, such as financial technology (fintech) and blockchain (using the dataset in this study). Thus, we believe that further studies need to address such two topics, considering that management practices, primarily finance, are now highly influenced by technological innovation.

4.3.3. Thematic Evolution

In addition to the trend topic analysis shown in the previous section, the research trend can also be seen from the thematic evolution of the documents published by Jurnal Pengurusan, as shown in Figure 7. This figure illustrates that some topics or keywords have been less popular, but some have become more popular among researchers in Jurnal Pengurusan. It can be indicated that the research topic of ‘effective commitment’ was popular only from 2006 to 2016 but lost its popularity in the newer period (2017 to 2021). Furthermore, the topic of ‘Islamic bank’ also somewhat declined in terms of popularity as researchers perhaps were keener on studying more recent financial institutions or other topics which are closely related to technology, such as organizational mobility (Kadir et al. 2021) and ICT usage (Ibrahim et al. 2020).
The top three topics gaining more popularity in the recent period of Jurnal Pengurusan include ‘Malaysia’, ‘communication’, and ‘corporate governance’. The word ‘Malaysia’ is understandably thriving because a vast number of papers in the journal used the country context of Malaysia. Based on our observation, at least 165 papers mentioned the word ‘Malaysia’ in their titles (see, for instance, Ramli et al. 2021; Saad et al. 2021). Furthermore, the word ‘communication’ slightly obtained popularity due to its significance in affecting firm performance. Technology-enabled communication is effective in improving employees’ knowledge (Ibrahim et al. 2020). Moreover, ‘corporate governance’ obtained popularity in recent years because it is evidenced to have a positive association with the environmental performance of a company (Ibrahim et al. 2020).
All in all, Figure 7 shows that the topics in Jurnal Pengurusan have evolved, adapting to the changing practices of management practices and business landscapes. Additionally, this figure illustrates the dynamics of Jurnal Pengurusan as an outlet that facilitates researchers to be more updated in future management and business studies.

5. Managerial Implication

Our study provides several managerial implications. First, companies may find it helpful to know that the studies in management have been well studied in Academica, primarily in the Asia region, as found in the Jurnal Pengurusan. Management practices in various industries have been captured quite in detail, as was found in the results of our studies, primarily in the most frequent word sub-section and trend topics. Second, managers of any firm may acquire knowledge from our study that the evolution of management science is definitive, since changes in both practical and academic domains constantly occur. By realizing this fact, firm managers are expected to pay attention to academic works, such as those in the Jurnal Pengurusan, specializing in management studies.
Islamic banking and philanthropy, as well as other disciplines related to Islamic finance, have served as the basis for numerous articles in this journal. This has established Malaysia as a global model and center for Islamic finance. This will indirectly benefit and serve as a guide for policymakers and players in the Islamic finance industry as they confront global financial issues and industrial competitiveness in the increasingly challenging and competitive field of Islamic economics and finance. Jurnal Pengurusan will remain relevant as a primary reference for Islamic financial fund managers in the future.

6. Conclusions

This study presents a literature mapping on a management journal discussing management science and practices, primarily in Asia. Jurnal Pengurusan is selected as the case for this study to examine this journal’s extensively available and less-researched topics. The scientific work evaluation in this paper provides insightful knowledge to academia, such as editors of business and management journals and practitioners, such as managers. This paper helps academia understand management research, primarily in the context of Asia. Additionally, researchers can perform research on the topics that have not been tapped extensively in Jurnal Pengurusan, such as the ones related to blockchain, metaverse, and financial technology. Company managers, mainly in Asia, can benefit from this study by knowing the contemporary topics that are well-studied in a specific management outlet. Finally, as the science and art of management constantly evolve, academia and practitioners must keep alert to current managerial studies to make decisions appropriately.

Author Contributions

E.A.F. and F.A.H. reviewed the literature, developed the methodology, and designed the study. H.W. and A.G. edited the article and reviewed all work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The funding was provided by Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study are from the Scopus database.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ab Hamid, Siti Ngayesah, Wan Jamaliah Wan Jusoh, and Suharni Maulan. 2021. The Influence of Spiritual Brand Attributes towards the Corporate Brand Image of Islamic Banking Institutions in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 61: 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abbas, Alhamzah F., Ahmad Jusoh, Adaviah Mas’od, Ahmed H. Alsharif, Javed Ali, and Albert W. K. Tan. 2022. Cogent Business & Management Bibliometrix Analysis of Information Sharing in Social Media Bibliometrix Analysis of Information Sharing in Social Media. Cogent Business & Management 9: 2016556. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdullah, Maizatulakma, and Zaleha Abdul Shukor. 2017. The Comparative Moderating Effect of Risk Management Committee and Audit Committee on the Association Between Voluntary Risk Management Disclosure and Firm Performance. Jurnal Pengurusan 51: 159–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdullah, Shamsul Nahar, and Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail. 2013. Gender, Ethnic and Age Diversity of the Boards of Large Malaysian Firms and Performance. Jurnal Pengurusan 38: 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Aisyah, Abd Rahman, and Zaleha Zaid. 2015. Developing a Framework of Islamic Bank Operational Risk Management: ‘People Risk’. Jurnal Pengurusan 44: 129–39. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Hawari, Mohammad A. 2011. The Role of Bank Automated Services in Gaining Customers’ Trust: A Practical Study in UAE. Jurnal Pengurusan 33: 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  7. Alshater, Muneer Maher Mahmoud, Mohammad Kabir Hassan, Ashraf Khan, and Irum Saba. 2021. Influential and Intellectual Structure of Islamic Finance: A Bibliometric Review. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 14: 339–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aman, Aini, and Ruhanita Maelah. 2011. Relational Risks and Trust: A Case Study of Accounting Outsourcing in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 32: 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. Aria, Masimo, and Corrado Cuccurullo. 2017. Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11: 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bashar, Abu, Shalini Singh, and Vivek Kumar Pathak. 2022. A Bibliometric Review of Online Impulse Buying Behaviour. International Journal of Electronic Business 17: 162–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Baz, Jamal El, and Sadia Iddik. 2022. Green Supply Chain Management and Organizational Culture: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus Data (2001–2020). International Journal of Organizational Analysis 30: 156–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bidin, Zainol, Kamil Md Idris, and Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin. 2009. Predicting Compliance Intention on Zakah on Employment Income in Malaysia: An Application of Reasoned Action Theory. Jurnal Pengurusan 28: 85–102. [Google Scholar]
  13. Buniamin, Sharifah, Bakhtiar Alrazi, Nor Hasimah Johari, and Noor Raida Abd Rahman. 2011. Corporate Governance Practices and Environmental Reporting of Companies in Malaysia: Finding Possibilities of Double Thumbs Up (Amalan Tadbir Urus Korporat Dan Pelaporan Alam Sekitar Syarikat Di Malaysia: Mengkaji Kemungkinan Hubungan Baik Antara Kedua-Du. Jurnal Pengurusan 32: 55–71. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun, Yong Kah, Chung Jee Fenn, and Akram Abdulraqeb Sultan Al-Khaled. 2021. The Relationship between Socio-Demographics and Financial Literacy with Financial Planning Among Young Adults in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 63: 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cobo, Manuel Jesús, Antonio Gabriel López Herrera, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, and Francisco Herrera. 2012. SciMAT: A New Science Mapping Analysis Software Tool. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology 3: 1609–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. de las Heras-Rosas, Carlos, and Juan Herrera. 2021. Research Trends in Open Innovation and the Role of the University. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 7: 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Embong, Mohd Rodzi, Roshaiza Taha, and Mohd Nazli Mohd Nor. 2013. Role of Zakat to Eradicate Poverty in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 39: 141–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fang, Hui. 2021. Analysis of the New Scopus CiteScore. Scientometrics 126: 5321–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Firmansyah, Egi Arvian, Amelia Rizky Alamanda, and Teguh Santoso. 2020. An Evaluation of Scholarly Works in Zakat: A Bibliometric Analysis of Islamic Economics Journals in Indonesia. Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah 4: 311–23. [Google Scholar]
  20. Firmansyah, Egi Arvian, and Budi Harsanto. 2022. Islamic Fintech Research: Systematic Review Using Mainstream Databases. Etikonomi 21: 355–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gunardi, Ardi, Aldrin Herwany, Erie Febrian, and Mokhamad Anwar. 2021. Research on Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility and Islamic Bank Disclosures. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment 12: 1308–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gupta, Manish, and Musarrat Shaheen. 2017. The Relationship between Psychological Capital and Turnover Intention: Work Engagement as Mediator and Work Experience as Moderator. Jurnal Pengurusan 49: 117–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hasbullah, Nurul Adilah, and Asmak Ab Rahman. 2021. Strategies for Managing Endowment Funds: Case Studies of Selected Malaysian Public Universities. Jurnal Pengurusan 62: 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hassan, Mohammad Kabir, Fahmi Ali Hudaefi, and Ahmad Agung. 2022. Evaluating indonesian islamic banking scholarly publications: A data analytics. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance 8: 341–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hodi, Nazia Abdul, and Zaiton Hassan. 2021. Relationship between Organizational Trust, Employee Voice and Silence Behaviour: The Moderator Effect of Power Distance. Jurnal Pengurusan 62: 131–44. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ibrahim, Hazril Izwar, Wan Maisara Wan Mohamad, and Khairul Anuar Mohammad Shah. 2020. Investigating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Usage, Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Behavior among Engineers in Electrical and Electronic MNCs in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 58: 133–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ingale, Kavita Karan, and Ratna Achuta Paluri. 2022. Financial Literacy and Financial Behaviour: A Bibliometric Analysis. Review of Behavioral Finance 14: 130154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jaffar, Romlah, Dina Mardinah, and Azlina Ahmad. 2013. Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure Practices: Evidence from a Two Tier Board Systems in Indonesia. Jurnal Pengurusan 39: 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jaffar, Romlah, Razieh RaziAziendeh, Zaleha Abdul Shukor, and Mara Ridhuan Che Abdul Rahman. 2018. Environmental Performance: Does Corporate Governance Matter? Jurnal Pengurusan 52: 133–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Joshi, Aditi. 2016. Comparison Between Scopus & ISI Web of Science. Journal Global Values VII: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kadir, Osman, Mohd Zaidi Omar, and Mohamad Sattar Rasul. 2021. The Impact of Psychological Well-Being, Employability and Work-Life Balance on Organizational Mobility of Women Engineering Technology Graduate. Jurnal Pengurusan 63: 99–113. [Google Scholar]
  32. Khan, Waris Ali, Ramraini Ali Hassan, Muhammad Zulqarnain Arshad, and Umair Kashif. 2020. Does Innovation Affect the Firm Performance in Developing Countries? A Conceptual Framework. Jurnal Pengurusan 59: 117–27. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mabkhot, Hashed Ahmad, Hasnizam Shaari, and Salniza Md Salleh. 2017. The Influence of Brand Image and Brand Personality on Brand Loyalty, Mediating by Brand Trust: An Empirical Study. Jurnal Pengurusan 50: 71–82. [Google Scholar]
  34. Marzuki, Marziana Madah, and Roslina Salwani Haji Shukri. 2019. Directors’ Remuneration, Firm Performance and Political Connection: Evidence from State-Owned Enterprise (SOE) in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 57: 184–97. [Google Scholar]
  35. Maulod, Sharul Azlan, Rasidah Arshad, and Ida Rosnita Ismail. 2020. Hubungan Antara Konflik Dan Tingkah Laku Buli Dalam Unit Kerja: Peranan Kepercayaan Sebagai Pengantara. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management) 59: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mohamed, Mohd Faiz, Joni Tamkin Borhan, and Nurhanani Romli. 2016. Shariah Governance of Takaful Industry in Malaysia: Implications of Post Islamic Financial Services Act 2013. Jurnal Pengurusan 47: 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mohd Nor, Shifa, and Noor Azuan Hashim. 2015. CSR and Sustainability of Islamic Banking: The Bankers View (CSR Dan Kemampanan Perbankan Islam: Pandangan Pegawai Bank). Jurnal Pengurusan 45: 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Nizar, Nadifa Salsabila, and Falikhatun. 2021. Islamic Intellectual Capital and Takaful Financial Performance. Jurnal Pengurusan 62: 91–99. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nor, Hamezah Md, and Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail. 2017. The Moderating Effects of Independent Directors ‘ Human Capital on the Relationship between Related Party Transactions and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 51: 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Omar, Nor Asiah, Hasnan Md Aris, and Muhamad Azrin Nazri. 2016. The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Innovation Capability and Knowledge Creation on Firm Performance A Perspective on Small Scale Entrepreneurs. Jurnal Pengurusan 48: 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Omar, Nor Asiah, Muhamad Azrin Nazri, Syed Shah Alam, and Mohd Helmi Ali. 2017. Consumer Retaliation to Halal Violation Incidents: The Mediating Role of Trust Recovery. Jurnal Pengurusan 51: 101–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Özdemir, Mücahit, and Mervan Selçuk. 2021. A Bibliometric Analysis of the the International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 14: 767–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Puri-Mirza, Amna. 2021. Leading Countries in Islamic Banking Assets Worldwide in 2019. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1090903/worldwide-leading-countries-in-islamic-banking-assets-by-value/ (accessed on 30 September 2022).
  44. Ramli, Nathasa Mazna, Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman, Ainulashikin Marzuki, and Marziana Madah Marzuki. 2021. Implementation of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement: Issues and Challenges Faced by the Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 63: 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  45. Reuters, Thomson. 2008. Whitepaper Using Bibliometrics. Thomson Reuters 2008: 12. [Google Scholar]
  46. Saad, Natrah, Abdulsalam Mas’ud, Saliza Abdul Aziz, Nor Azizah Abdul Manaf, and Muhammad Aqbal Mashadi. 2021. Tax Noncompliance of High Net-Worth Individuals (HNWIS) in Malaysia: Perspectives of Tax Professionals. Jurnal Pengurusan 63: 85–98. [Google Scholar]
  47. Shaladdin, Zaida Farhana Mohd, Mohd Zulkifli Mokhtar, and Nur Haiza Muhammad Zawawi. 2018. Determinants of Customer Satisfaction in Takaful (Islamic Insurance) Services in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 54: 205–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sufian, Fadzlan, Fakarudin Kamarudin, and Nor Halida Haziaton Mohd Noor. 2013. Assessing the Revenue Efficiency of Domestic and Foreign Islamic Banks: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 37: 77–90. [Google Scholar]
  49. Suhaili, Nur Aqidah, Mohd Rizal Palil, and Rohayati Husin. 2018. Wakaf CSR: An Emperical Study of Polycentric Collaborative Waqf Governance. Jurnal Pengurusan 53: 133–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Taqi, Muhamad, Aam Slamet Rusydiana, Nanik Kustiningsih, and Irman Firmansyah. 2021. Environmental Accounting: A Scientometric Using Biblioshiny. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 11: 369–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Teh, Boon Heng, Tze San Ong, Adedeji Babatunji Samuel, and Sin Huei Ng. 2016. An Empirical Study of Auditors Switching, Corporate Governance and Financial Performances of Malaysian Public Listed Companies (PLCs). Jurnal Pengurusan 47: 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thaker, Mohamed Asmy Mohd Thas, and Hassanudin Mohd Thas Thaker. 2015. Exploring the Contemporary Issues of Corporate Share Waqf Model in Malaysia with the Reference to the Waqaf An-Nur Corporation Berhad. Jurnal Pengurusan 45: 165–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Thing, Ng Suat, Mohd Hasimi Yaacob, and Norazlan Alias. 2021. Information Asymmetry and Industry 4.0 among Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) in Malaysian Halal Industry. Jurnal Pengurusan 63: 31–49. [Google Scholar]
  54. Thomas, Asha, and Vikas Gupta. 2021. Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: Bibliometrics and a Framework-Based Systematic Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, Theories, Methods and Future Directions. Journal of Knowledge Management 26: 1014–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Trapp, Jamie V. 2020. The New Scopus CiteScore Formula and the Journal Impact Factor: A Look at Top Ranking Journals and Middle Ranking Journals in the Scopus Categories of General Physics and Astronomy, Materials Science, General Medicine and Social Sciences. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine 43: 739–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Usman, Muhammad, and Asmak Ab Rahman. 2021. Financing Higher Education through Waqf in Pakistan: Issues and Challenges. Jurnal Pengurusan 62: 159–71. [Google Scholar]
  57. van Eck, Nees Jan, and Ludo Waltman. 2010. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 84: 523–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yong, Othman. 2007. Investor Demand, Size Effect and Performance of Malaysian Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Post-1997 Financial Crisis. Jurnal Pengurusan 26: 25–47. [Google Scholar]
  59. Yong, Othman. 2011. Winner’s Curse and Bandwagon Effect in Malaysian IPOs: Evidence from 2001–2009. Jurnal Pengurusan 32: 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  60. Zainudin, Zalina, Izani Ibrahim, Hafezali Iqbal Hussain, and Abdul Razak Abdul Hadi. 2017. Debt and Financial Performance of REITs in Malaysia: An Optimal Debt Threshold Analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 51: 73–85. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zaki, Hafizah Omar, and Siti Ngayesah Ab Hamid. 2021. The Influence of Time Availability, Happiness, and Weariness on Consumers’ Impulse Buying Tendency amidst Covid-19 Partial Lockdown in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan 62: 81–90. [Google Scholar]
Jrfm 15 00507 g001 550
Figure 1. Cite Score of Jurnal Pengurusan (2011–2021).
Figure 1. Cite Score of Jurnal Pengurusan (2011–2021).
Jrfm 15 00507 g001
Jrfm 15 00507 g002 550
Figure 2. Annual publication trend of Jurnal Pengurusan (2006–2021). Linear regression formula; Y = a + b X ; Y is the cites score and X is the year. Source: authors’ analysis.
Figure 2. Annual publication trend of Jurnal Pengurusan (2006–2021). Linear regression formula; Y = a + b X ; Y is the cites score and X is the year. Source: authors’ analysis.
Jrfm 15 00507 g002
Jrfm 15 00507 g003 550
Figure 3. Corresponding author’s country.
Figure 3. Corresponding author’s country.
Jrfm 15 00507 g003
Jrfm 15 00507 g004 550
Figure 4. Country collaboration map.
Figure 4. Country collaboration map.
Jrfm 15 00507 g004
Jrfm 15 00507 g005 550
Figure 5. Top 10 most frequent author keywords in Jurnal Pengurusan.
Figure 5. Top 10 most frequent author keywords in Jurnal Pengurusan.
Jrfm 15 00507 g005
Jrfm 15 00507 g006 550
Figure 6. Trend topics of Jurnal Pengurusan.
Figure 6. Trend topics of Jurnal Pengurusan.
Jrfm 15 00507 g006
Jrfm 15 00507 g007 550
Figure 7. Thematic Evolution of Jurnal Pengurusan.
Figure 7. Thematic Evolution of Jurnal Pengurusan.
Jrfm 15 00507 g007
Table
Table 1. Types and Quantities of Jurnal Pengurusan Publications (2006–2021).
Table 1. Types and Quantities of Jurnal Pengurusan Publications (2006–2021).
TypeQuantityPercentage
Article47294.40%
Review275.40%
Conference paper10.20%
Total500100%
Table
Table 2. Top 20 Authors of Jurnal Pengurusan (2006–2021).
Table 2. Top 20 Authors of Jurnal Pengurusan (2006–2021).
RankAuthorsNumber of Document
1Omar NA14
2Arshad R12
3Adham KA9
4Ali MH9
5Isa RM9
6Nor FM9
7Saleh NM9
8Abdullah NL8
9Janor H8
10Maelah R8
11Nazri MA8
12Abdul-Rahman A7
13Hassan MS7
14Rahim RA7
15Shukor ZA7
16Ahmad A6
17Alam SS6
18Aziz NA6
19Hamzah N6
20Ismail A6
Table
Table 3. Top 20 Affiliations of Jurnal Pengurusan (2006–2021).
Table 3. Top 20 Affiliations of Jurnal Pengurusan (2006–2021).
RankAffiliationNumber of Document
1Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia303
2Universiti Utara Malaysia57
3Universiti Sains Malaysia32
4Universiti Putra Malaysia30
5Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia25
6Universiti Teknologi Mara20
7Multimedia University18
8Universiti Malaysia Sabah15
9International Islamic University Malaysia11
10Universiti Malaysia Terengganu11
11University of Malaya10
12Universiti Malaya9
13Universiti Utara Malaysia UUM8
14Universiti Malaysia Sarawak6
15Inti International University5
16Universitas Airlangga5
17Universiti Malaysia Kelantan5
18Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris5
19Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin5
20Universiti Teknologi Malaysia5
Table
Table 4. The 10 Countries with the Most Citations.
Table 4. The 10 Countries with the Most Citations.
NoCountryTotal CitationsAverage Article Citations
1Malaysia13593.251
2Indonesia893.296
3India299.667
4United Kingdom186
5Sudan1515
6Saudi Arabia136.5
7Pakistan102
8Nigeria52.5
9Iraq20.667
10Morocco22
Table
Table 5. The 10 Most Influential Articles.
Table 5. The 10 Most Influential Articles.
NoAuthor and Publication YearTitleTotal Citations (TC)TC Per Year
1Abdullah and Ismail (2013)“Gender, Ethnic and Age Diversity of the Boards of Large Malaysian Firms and Performance”454.5
2Bidin et al. (2009)“Predicting Compliance Intention on Zakah on Employment Income in Malaysia: An Application of Reasoned Action Theory”433.0714
3Mabkhot et al. (2017)“The influence of brand image and brand personality on brand loyalty, mediating by brand trust: An empirical study”274.5
4Zainudin et al. (2017)“Debt and Financial Performance of REITs in Malaysia: A Moderating Effect of Financial Flexibility”264.3333
5Sufian et al. (2013)“Assessing the Revenue Efficiency of Domestic and Foreign Islamic Banks:
Empirical Evidence from Malaysia”		262.6
6Buniamin et al. (2011)“Corporate Governance Practices and Environmental Reporting of Companies
in Malaysia: Finding Possibilities of Double Thumbs Up”		252.0833
7Yong (2011)“Winner’s Curse and Bandwagon Effect in Malaysian IPOs:
Evidence from 2001–2009”		201.6667
8Gupta and Shaheen (2017)“The Relationship between Psychological Capital and Turnover Intention: Work
Engagement as Mediator and Work Experience as Moderator”		193.1667
9Embong et al. (2013)“Role of zakat to eradicate poverty in Malaysia”181.8
10Yong (2007)“Investor demand, size effect and performance of Malaysian initial public offerings: Evidence from post-1997 financial crisis”181.125
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Firmansyah, E.A.; Wahid, H.; Gunardi, A.; Hudaefi, F.A. A Scientometric Study on Management Literature in Southeast Asia. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2022, 15, 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15110507

AMA Style

Firmansyah EA, Wahid H, Gunardi A, Hudaefi FA. A Scientometric Study on Management Literature in Southeast Asia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022; 15(11):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15110507

Chicago/Turabian Style

Firmansyah, Egi Arvian, Hairunnizam Wahid, Ardi Gunardi, and Fahmi Ali Hudaefi. 2022. "A Scientometric Study on Management Literature in Southeast Asia" Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15, no. 11: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15110507

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop