Next Article in Journal
Incorporating Credit Quality in Bank Efficiency Measurements: A Directional Distance Function Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Systemic Risk Indicators Based on Nonlinear PolyModel
Previous Article in Journal
Stock Market Volatility and Trading Volume: A Special Case in Hong Kong With Stock Connect Turnover
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Culture and the Role Model of the Honorable Merchant
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperReview
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2018, 11(4), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm11040077

On the Rising Complexity of Bank Regulatory Capital Requirements: From Global Guidelines to their United States (US) Implementation

1
Lowder Eminent Scholar in Finance, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
2
Senior Research Fellow, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 2 October 2018 / Revised: 19 October 2018 / Accepted: 30 October 2018 / Published: 1 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Crises, Macroeconomic Management, and Financial Regulation)
Full-Text   |   PDF [676 KB, uploaded 20 November 2018]   |  

Abstract

After the Latin American Debt Crisis of 1982, the official response worldwide turned to minimum capital standards to promote stable banking systems. Despite their existence, however, such standards have still not prevented periodic disruptions in the banking sectors of various countries. After the 2007–2009 crisis, bank capital requirements have, in some cases, increased and overall have become even more complex. This paper reviews (1) how Basel-style capital adequacy guidelines have evolved, becoming higher in some cases and overall more complex, (2) how the United States (US) implementation of these guidelines has contributed to regulatory complexity, even when omitting other bank capital regulations that are specific to the US, and (3) how the US regulatory measures still do not provide equally valuable information about whether a bank is adequately capitalized. View Full-Text
Keywords: bank regulation; capital adequacy standards; regulatory complexity; US banking crises bank regulation; capital adequacy standards; regulatory complexity; US banking crises
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Barth, J.R.; Miller, S.M. On the Rising Complexity of Bank Regulatory Capital Requirements: From Global Guidelines to their United States (US) Implementation. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2018, 11, 77.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Risk Financial Manag. EISSN 1911-8074 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top