J. Risk Financial Manag. 2018, 11(2), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm11020018
Value-at-Risk for South-East Asian Stock Markets: Stochastic Volatility vs. GARCH
1
John von Neumann Institute, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
2
Queen’s Management School, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
3
Faculty of Business and Economics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
4
Institute for Operations Research and Computational Finance, University of St. Gallen, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 March 2018 / Revised: 3 April 2018 / Accepted: 3 April 2018 / Published: 5 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends in Emerging Markets Finance, Institutions and Money)
Abstract
This study compares the performance of several methods to calculate the Value-at-Risk of the six main ASEAN stock markets. We use filtered historical simulations, GARCH models, and stochastic volatility models. The out-of-sample performance is analyzed by various backtesting procedures. We find that simpler models fail to produce sufficient Value-at-Risk forecasts, which appears to stem from several econometric properties of the return distributions. With stochastic volatility models, we obtain better Value-at-Risk forecasts compared to GARCH. The quality varies over forecasting horizons and across markets. This indicates that, despite a regional proximity and homogeneity of the markets, index volatilities are driven by different factors. View Full-TextKeywords:
ASEAN; GARCH; stochastic volatility; Value-at-Risk
▼
Figures
Figure 1
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Bui Quang, P.; Klein, T.; Nguyen, N.H.; Walther, T. Value-at-Risk for South-East Asian Stock Markets: Stochastic Volatility vs. GARCH. J. Risk Financial Manag. 2018, 11, 18.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
Related Articles
Article Metrics
Comments
[Return to top]
J. Risk Financial Manag.
EISSN 1911-8074
Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland
RSS
E-Mail Table of Contents Alert