Next Article in Journal
Mediation Analysis to Investigate Differences in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Stage Through Environmental Risk Factors in Louisiana
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the Population, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation (EGFRm): A Retrospective Cohort Study from IPO Porto
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prognostic Utility of Combining VI-RADS Scores and CYFRA 21-1 Levels in Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8603, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(8), 415; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080415
Submission received: 21 June 2025 / Revised: 22 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 24 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)

Simple Summary

No widely accepted biomarkers for bladder cancer prognosis exist. To our knowledge, no previous study has combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data with a serum biomarker for this purpose. We combined Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scores with serum cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1) levels for prognostic prediction. This retrospective study examined 134 patients with bladder cancer after transurethral resection. Patients with both high VI-RADS scores (≥4) and CYFRA 21-1 levels (≥1.8 ng/mL) had a 3-year overall survival of 8.3% and were strongly associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio = 7.51, p = 0.002). In subgroup analyses, this group showed significantly worse outcomes in both treated (HR = 4.80, p = 0.003) and untreated patients (HR = 35.98, p < 0.001), emphasizing the importance of early identification and intervention in high-risk patients. This combined model could identify high-risk bladder cancer patients, supporting earlier and more personalized treatment decisions.

Abstract

The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) is used to detect muscle-invasive bladder cancer, with emerging prognostic implications. Integrating imaging parameters with molecular biomarkers may improve risk stratification in bladder cancer. This study evaluated whether combining VI-RADS scores with serum cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1) levels—a clinically relevant biomarker for bladder cancer—could improve overall survival (OS) prediction. We retrospectively analyzed 134 patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors, magnetic resonance imaging, and postoperative serum CYFRA 21-1 measurements. In total, 15 cancer-specific deaths were observed during follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified optimal prognostic cut-off values: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS in patients with both high VI-RADS scores and CYFRA 21-1 levels were 42.9%, 16.7%, and 8.3%, respectively, significantly lower than those in other groups (p < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that such patients had the poorest OS (hazard ratio: 7.51; p = 0.002). This suggests that combining VI-RADS and CYFRA 21-1 improves prognostic accuracy in bladder cancer, demonstrating potential clinical utility by informing individualized treatment strategies; however, limitations include the retrospective study design and absence of external validation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bladder cancer (BC) is among the top 10 most common cancer types worldwide, with approximately 550,000 new cases reported annually in 2020 [1]. At diagnosis, approximately 30% of patients with BC present with muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) and 5% with metastatic BC (MBC). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate for MIBC patients is approximately 65%, and the prognosis is poor [2]. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is important for the effective treatment of BC.
The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) is widely used to predict MIBC and has shown high diagnostic accuracy [3]. However, its prognostic value remains under investigation and is mainly supported by studies involving post-cystectomy patients [4]. These limitations highlight the need for additional prognostic tools that can be applied prior to definitive treatment.
Serum tumor markers have gained increasing attention in recent years as minimally invasive tools for risk stratification in solid tumors, including BC. Their potential to reflect tumor biology, tumor burden, and treatment response makes them useful adjuncts to imaging-based assessments. A recent review emphasized the potential clinical utility of serum tumor markers in MIBC, highlighting their role in diagnosis, prognosis, and disease monitoring [5]. We specifically investigated cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1) as a complementary biomarker to VI-RADS. Cytokeratins are proteins found in epithelial cells that indicate differentiation. As a soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19, CYFRA 21-1 is detectable in the serum and is elevated in various solid tumors, including BC [6,7,8]. In other cancer types, a combination of imaging diagnostics and serum biomarkers has been used to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis prediction [9]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has evaluated the prognostic utility of combining VI-RADS and CYFRA 21-1 in BC. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the prognostic utility of this multimodal approach in BC. We hypothesized that a combination of VI-RADS and serum CYFRA 21-1 levels would provide more accurate prognostic stratification than either marker alone.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

This retrospective, single-center study included patients with suspected BC who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), and subsequent measurement of serum CYFRA 21-1 levels at Nippon Medical School Hospital between January 2019 and August 2023. Patients were identified through a review of institutional electronic medical records. One patient without pathological confirmation of urothelial carcinoma (UC) was excluded. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Nippon Medical School Hospital (Approval Number: F-2023-049) and conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The requirement for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study; however, all eligible patients were given the opportunity to opt out via the IRB website.

2.2. Image Acquisition

VI-RADS scoring was performed by two urologists—one with over 10 years of clinical experience and 5 bladder MRI interpretations, and the other with over 5 years of clinical experience and 3 bladder MRI interpretations. The overall VI-RADS score, ranging from 1 to 5, was assigned based on the combined interpretation of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, following the recommendations described in the original VI-RADS proposal by Panebianco et al. [10]. In cases without DCE-MRI, the score was based on biparametric MRI using DWI and T2WI, as described by Noh et al. [11]. Disagreement between the two readers was resolved by consensus. In addition, a radiologist provided diagnostic examples to assist in the grading process. The two MRI readers were blinded to all outcome data, including pathological diagnosis and serum CYFRA 21-1 levels, to prevent interpretation bias. Additionally, there were no missing MRI data, pathological findings, or CYFRA 21-1 measurements in this study cohort.

2.3. Techniques and Procedures in Transurethral Resection of BC

TURBT was performed by resecting all visible tumor lesions along with two additional deep layers from the index area to ensure sufficient sampling. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and submitted for pathological evaluation. Muscle invasion was assessed by a uropathologist with over 20 years of experience.

2.4. Serum Collection

CYFRA 21-1 levels were measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Elecsys CYFRA 21-1 Immunoassay; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). CYFRA 21-1 levels were measured after TURBT. This approach aimed to avoid confounding effects from the local tumor volume and better reflect systemic disease activity. Sera were collected postoperatively with a median of 1 day (mean, 10.2; range, 1–116 days), and 85.8% of patients had samples obtained within 3 days after TURBT.

2.5. Study Workflow and Statistical Methods

First, VI-RADS scores were evaluated by two urologists. We then constructed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on VI-RADS scores and CYFRA 21-1 levels to predict 1-year survival. We divided the patients into four groups based on cut-off values: high and low VI-RADS scores and high and low CYFRA 21-1 levels. We summarized the clinicopathological characteristics of each group. Next, a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was conducted to compare the overall survival (OS) among the four groups. To assess multicollinearity, collinearity diagnostics were performed using variance inflation factors (VIF) prior to multivariate Cox regression analysis. Finally, Cox proportional hazards regression was conducted to assess the prognostic impact of individual clinicopathological factors. Additional subgroup analyses were conducted to compare outcomes between treated and untreated patients, particularly within the highest-risk group versus all other groups. These analyses were also performed in patients without metastasis to evaluate the prognostic impact in localized disease. The treated group was defined as patients who received either systemic chemotherapy or radical cystectomy. A post hoc power analysis was performed based on the observed hazard ratio (HR), α = 0.05, and the proportion of high-risk patients.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

The diagnostic performance of the VI-RADS in the detection of MIBC was evaluated. The weighted kappa coefficient was used to assess inter-reader agreement. The cut-off value for CYFRA 21-1 levels was determined using Youden’s index. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each variable. To avoid multicollinearity, the VI-RADS scores and CYFRA 21-1 levels were not included as continuous or separate covariates in the multivariate model. Instead, the combined risk group variable (based on both VI-RADS score and CYFRA 21-1 level stratification) was used as a single composite variable to represent prognostic classification. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 10.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) software (p < 0.05).

3. Results

A total of 135 patients who underwent TURBT, preoperative MRI, and measurement of serum CYFRA 21-1 between January 2019 and August 2023 were identified. One patient was excluded due to non-UC in the final pathology report. Consequently, 134 patients were included in the final analysis and categorized according to their VI-RADS scores, as shown in Figure 1.
In this study, the median follow-up duration was 20.0 months, during which 20 deaths (14.9%) were observed. A VI-RADS cut-off score of four showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89, with 87.8% sensitivity, 89.2% specificity, 88.8% accuracy, 78.3% positive predictive value, and 94.3% negative predictive value. This VI-RADS score of four had better diagnostic performance than other VI-RADS scores. The agreement between the two readers was substantial, with kappa statistics of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78–0.90) for the T2WI score, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83–0.93) for the DWI score, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73–0.89) for the DCE score, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81–0.93) for the VI-RADS score. Excellent agreement was observed between readers in the assessment of VI-RADS scores.
ROC analysis showed that a VI-RADS score of four had a high predictive ability for 1-year survival (AUC: 0.812), whereas CYFRA 21-1 levels had a high predictive ability for 1-year OS (AUC: 0.869 as a continuous variable). Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value for CYFRA 21-1 was determined to be 1.8 ng/mL using the Youden index (value: 0.627), resulting in an AUC of 0.838 (Figure 2).
We classified the participants into four groups based on the combination of the VI-RADS score (≥4 or ≤3) and CYFRA 21-1 level (≥1.8 ng/mL or <1.8 ng/mL) as follows:
  • Group 1: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL
  • Group 2: VI-RADS score ≤ 3 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL
  • Group 3: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level < 1.8 ng/mL
  • Group 4: VI-RADS score ≤ 3 and CYFRA 21-1 level < 1.8 ng/mL
Table 1 shows the distribution of clinicopathological features according to each group. The median age of the patients was 73 years (interquartile range [IQR], 65–80 years). The blood tests showed mean CYFRA 21-1 levels of 2.01 ng/mL (IQR, 1.0–1.5; median 1.0 ng/mL). The histopathological findings showed that 93 (69.4%) patients had non-MIBC and 41 (30.6%) had MIBC. Seven (5.2%) patients had organ metastases, with some of them experiencing it in multiple organs. There were three lung metastases (2.2%), three liver metastases (2.2%), and three bone metastases (2.2%). Lymph node metastases were observed in eight patients (6.0%). Patients in Group 1 had average CYFRA 21-1 levels of 7.93 ng/mL and an average VI-RADS score of 4.75. Compared to the other groups, Group 1 showed the highest proportion of MIBC (93.8%), high-grade tumors (100%), organ metastasis (31.3%), and lymph node metastasis (37.5%). The 1-,2-, and 3-year OS rates in Group 1 were 42.9%, 16.7%, and 8.3%, respectively, indicating a markedly poor prognosis (p < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively).
As shown in Figure 3, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that Group 1 had significantly poorer OS than the other groups—Group 2 (p < 0.011, HR 8.87, 95% CI: 1.14–69.33), Group 3 (p < 0.001, HR 6.08, 95% CI: 2.09–17.68), and Group 4 (p < 0.001, HR 28.97, 95% CI: 7.93–105.81).
Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that MIBC, high-grade histology, lymph node metastasis, organ metastasis, VI-RADS score ≥ 4, CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL, and their combination were significantly associated with a poor OS (Table 2). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the combination of VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 levels ≥ 1.8 ng/mL was an independent predictor of a poor OS (HR 7.51, 95% CI: 2.12–26.62, p = 0.002), as shown in Table 2. The VIF values for VI-RADS ≥ 4, CYFRA 21-1 ≥ 1.8 ng/mL, and their combination (Group 1) were 2.44, 2.79, and 3.66, respectively, when all three were included in the model, indicating potential multicollinearity. After excluding the individual predictors and retaining only Group 1, all the VIF values dropped below 1.6, confirming acceptable levels. Consequently, VI-RADS ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 ≥ 1.8 ng/mL were excluded from the final multivariate model and are indicated as “N/A” in Table 2. A post hoc power analysis, based on the observed hazard ratio (HR = 7.51), α = 0.05, and the proportion of high-risk patients (12%, defined as Group 1) indicated that at least 19 events were needed to achieve 80% power. Since 20 events occurred in our cohort, the study was considered adequately powered.
As shown in Figure 4, among treated patients, Group 1 had significantly worse OS than the other groups (log-rank p = 0.003, HR = 4.80, 95% CI: 1.50–15.35). Similarly, in the untreated subgroup, Group 1 showed significantly poorer OS than the other groups (log-rank p < 0.001, HR = 35.98, 95% CI: 8.65–149.63).
Additionally, as shown in Figure 5, in the non-metastatic group, Group 1 also demonstrated significantly poorer OS than the other groups (log-rank p < 0.001, HR = 10.86, 95% CI: 3.60–32.77).

4. Discussion

This study assessed the clinical significance of VI-RADS scores and CYFRA 21-1 levels in predicting prognosis. Both high VI-RADS scores and elevated CYFRA 21-1 levels are significantly associated with poor prognosis. In this study, a combination of VI-RADS scores ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 levels ≥ 1.8 ng/mL was strongly associated with poor prognosis in BC. To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the combination of VI-RADS and serum CYFRA 21-1 can effectively stratify BC patients by prognosis using a non-invasive, multimodal assessment. In particular, patients classified as high-risk based on both VI-RADS ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 ≥ 1.8 ng/mL had a 3-year OS rate of only 8.3%, highlighting the model’s ability to identify this subgroup with extremely poor outcomes.
Previous studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of MRI for specific cases of BC [12]. The VI-RADS is a diagnostic tool specifically designed to predict whether BC has invaded the muscle layer via MRI, and it has been reported to be highly accurate [3]. In the present study, our VI-RADS scoring also showed high diagnostic performance for MIBC, with an AUC of 0.89. MIBC is essentially a poor prognostic factor, and its diagnosis may directly help in predicting poor outcomes in patients with BC. Recent studies have suggested that a higher VI-RADS score may be associated with worse oncological outcomes. Zhuang et al. [4] showed that patients with VI-RADS scores ≥3 had significantly worse OS (HR = 3.517, p = 0.003). Consistently, our study also showed that patients with VI-RADS scores ≥ 4 had significantly worse OS (HR = 9.38, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that high VI-RADS scores have potential utility not only in assessing muscle invasion but also in estimating the prognosis of patients with BC as an imaging biomarker. Previous studies have developed several prognostic nomograms to estimate the prognosis of BC. Shariat et al. [2] showed that clinicopathological features such as pathological T-stage, lymph node status, and tumor grade are associated with oncological outcomes. Based on these factors, they developed a prognostic model that has been widely cited and is primarily used after radical cystectomy. While these models have contributed to more refined risk stratification in BC, many still depend on the pathological information collected after radical cystectomy, limiting their applicability for perioperative decision-making around TURBT [13,14]. In contrast to conventional nomograms that rely on postoperative pathology, our model can be applied immediately after TURBT to support early risk stratification. Combining preoperative VI-RADS scores with serum CYFRA 21-1 levels enables the early identification of high-risk patients. This approach is particularly useful for selecting candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or bladder-sparing strategies, where prompt decision-making is essential. Unlike models based solely on pathological staging, our method incorporates imaging and blood-based biomarkers, which may reflect tumor aggressiveness and occult metastasis. This imaging–biomarker model may complement existing post-cystectomy tools by offering personalized treatment strategies before definitive therapy.
In this study, CYFRA 21-1 levels also demonstrated significant value in estimating prognosis. Cytokeratin is overexpressed in BC [15]. Previous studies have demonstrated the accuracy of serum CYFRA 21-1 levels in diagnosing BC [16]. Daniel et al. [10] found increased CYFRA 21-1 levels in invasive UC. Andreadis et al. [17] reported that CYFRA 21-1 levels were significantly increased in patients with MBC. Moreover, an elevated serum CYFRA level was associated with poor prognosis. In our study model, the group with elevated CYFRA 21-1 levels after TURBT also had a lower 1-year OS, with an AUC of 0.87. The present study further attempted to combine CYFRA 21-1 levels with different VI-RADS score groups. Although CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL alone was a significant predictor of poor prognosis (HR: 9.13, p < 0.001), its combination with VI-RADS score ≥4 represented an even stronger prognostic factor (HR: 14.69, p < 0.001). Based on previous studies, we introduced CYFRA 21-1 as a complementary biomarker for advanced BC or MBC and developed a prognostic model combining this marker with VI-RADS. Although the possibility of lead-time bias cannot be completely ruled out, we intentionally measured CYFRA 21-1 levels after TURBT. We hypothesized that persistently elevated CYFRA 21-1 levels following local tumor resection may reflect the presence of residual local disease or undetected distant metastasis. This hypothesis is supported by prior reports demonstrating significantly elevated CYFRA 21-1 concentrations in MBC. For example, Andreadis et al. [17] reported elevated CYFRA 21-1 levels in 66% of metastatic cases, compared to only 7% of non-metastatic cases (p < 0.001). Similarly, in our cohort, patients with lymph node or visceral metastases had significantly higher mean CYFRA 21-1 levels (8.87 ng/mL) compared to those without metastasis (1.33 ng/mL, p < 0.001), suggesting that elevated post-TURBT CYFRA 21-1 levels may indicate the presence of advanced or metastatic disease. This supports the utility of CYFRA 21-1 as a complementary biomarker to VI-RADS and underscores the potential of the combined model to enhance risk stratification for poor prognosis in BC. To address the possibility that patients with metastatic disease may have biased the association between CYFRA 21-1 levels and prognosis, we performed a subgroup analysis restricted to non-metastatic cases. The results showed that the combination of VI-RADS and CYFRA 21-1 remained a strong prognostic indicator even in this non-metastatic group, supporting the robustness of the model across different disease stages. These findings suggest that using both biomarkers in combination may enable more accurate risk stratification than using either alone, potentially guiding decisions regarding earlier intervention or intensified follow-up in high-risk patients. Recent studies in other urologic malignancies have employed similar multimodal approaches integrating imaging and clinical factors including serum biomarkers. For instance, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, a nomogram integrating contrast-enhanced CT radiomics features with clinical variables has been shown to improve survival prediction compared to clinical factors alone [18]. In prostate cancer, diagnostic models combining Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores from multiparametric MRI with serum prostate-specific antigen levels have been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy compared to models using either modality alone [19,20]. These studies support the value of combining radiological and molecular data, reinforcing the rationale for our approach. Recent research has explored the integration of radiomics and clinical data for prognostic modeling in BC. For example, Haolin Huang et al. [21] developed a deep learning radiomics model based on MRI features combined with clinical variables, which achieved high accuracy in predicting 5-year recurrence risk in non-muscle-invasive BC. Similarly, another study employed CT-derived radiomics features combined with clinical data to develop a prognostic model using a gradient boosting machine algorithm, demonstrating significant predictive power for patient outcomes in MIBC [22]. The model demonstrated strong performance, supporting the utility of combining radiological and clinical variables for outcome prediction in BC. These findings provide further validation for the integration of imaging and clinical biomarkers in the BC setting. Building on these insights, our study may serve as a foundation for developing a more robust prognostic model that incorporates quantitative imaging features extracted via radiomics and serum CYFRA 21-1 levels. Such integration could enhance risk stratification and inform individualized treatment strategies in the future.
This study has several limitations. First, it was a retrospective, single-center analysis, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, the proposed model has not been externally validated, and prospective studies are needed to confirm its utility in broader clinical settings. Third, while the MRI protocols followed standard VI-RADS guidelines, some variability in acquisition parameters may exist across patients, potentially affecting reproducibility. Another limitation is the potential variability in CYFRA 21-1 levels due to the timing of blood sampling, which was conducted postoperatively. Although most samples were obtained shortly after TURBT, the absence of preoperative measurements and the wide range in timing may have introduced measurement bias related to changes in tumor burden. Additionally, as the diagnostic stratification was based on imaging and biomarkers measured during the perioperative period of TURBT, the study may be subject to lead-time bias, whereby earlier detection or stratification could lead to an overestimation of survival duration. Moreover, as CYFRA 21-1 was not measured in all eligible patients—partly due to its lack of insurance coverage in Japan—some patients declined testing. Although this was not based on clinical factors, the possibility of selection bias cannot be completely excluded, although it is unlikely to have substantially influenced the results. Future studies with preoperative sampling and clearly defined diagnostic timepoints are warranted to minimize these sources of bias. Despite these limitations, the findings provide valuable insight into the potential of combining imaging and serum biomarkers for risk stratification in BC.
There are currently no widely established prognostic biomarkers specific to BC. The combination of imaging-based assessment using VI-RADS and the measurement of a serum biomarker such as CYFRA 21-1 provides a new multimodal approach. We propose this combination as a potential integrative biomarker bridging the radiological and molecular domains. The findings may provide a foundation for the development of next-generation prognostic tools for BC.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates that high VI-RADS scores and CYFRA 21-1 levels showed good predictive ability for a poor OS, suggesting their potential as prognostic markers in BC. Furthermore, the combination of these two factors effectively stratified patients into prognostically distinct subgroups. This multimodal approach, integrating imaging and serum biomarkers, may assist clinicians in early risk assessment and treatment decision-making. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are warranted to validate these findings and to explore their utility in treatment stratification and guiding individualized treatment strategies. In particular, multicenter prospective studies incorporating radiomics-based imaging features and serum biomarkers, such as CYFRA 21-1, may facilitate the development of a more robust and generalizable prognostic model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.I.; formal analysis, S.I.; investigation, G.K. (Godai Kaneko), Y.E. and H.T.; methodology, S.I. and J.A.; supervision, J.A., G.K. (Go Kimura) and Y.K.; writing—original draft, S.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (MEXT KAKENHI, grant number 25K20053).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nippon Medical School Hospital (protocol code F-2023-049, approved on 5 July 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

The requirement for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. To ensure the opportunity to refuse participation, an opt-out option was made available on the website of the Institutional Review Board of Nippon Medical School Hospital.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to patient privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the patients for participating in this study and all the study staff at the clinical sites.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BCBladder cancer
MIBCMuscle-invasive bladder cancer
MBCMetastatic bladder cancer
VI-RADSThe Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System
CYFRA 21-1Cytokeratin fragment 19
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
TURBTTransurethral resection of bladder tumor
UCUrothelial carcinoma
IRBInstitutional Review Board
T2WIT2-weighted imaging
DWIDiffusion-weighted imaging
DCEDynamic contrast-enhanced
ROCReceiver operating characteristic
HRHazard ratio
CIConfidence interval
AUCArea under the curve
IQRInterquartile range
OSOverall survival
VIFVariance inflation factors

References

  1. Richters, A.; Aben, K.K.H.A.; Kiemeney, L.A.L.M. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: An update. World J. Urol. 2020, 38, 1895–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shariat, S.F.; Karakiewicz, P.I.; Palapattu, G.S.; Lotan, Y.; Rogers, C.G.; Amiel, G.E.; Vazina, A.; Gupta, A.; Bastian, P.J.; Sagalowsky, A.I.; et al. Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: A contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium. J. Urol. 2006, 176, 2414–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Del Giudice, F.; Flammia, R.S.; Pecoraro, M.; Moschini, M.; D’Andrea, D.; Messina, E.; Pisciotti, L.M.; De Berardinis, E.; Sciarra, A.; Panebianco, V. The accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS): An updated comprehensive multi-institutional, multi-readers systematic review and meta-analysis from diagnostic evidence into future clinical recommendations. World J. Urol. 2022, 40, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhuang, J.; Cai, L.; Sun, H.; Wu, Q.; Li, K.; Yu, R.; Cao, Q.; Li, P.; Yang, X.; Lu, Q. Vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) could predict the survival of bladder-cancer patients who received radical cystectomy. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 21502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Doshi, C.; Zahir, M.; Dadabhoy, A.; Escobar, D.; Xia, L.; Daneshmand, S. Serum tumor markers for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in clinical practice: A narrative review. Cancers 2025, 17, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sundström, B.E.; Stigbrand, T.I. Cytokeratins and tissue polypeptide antigen. Int. J. Biol. Markers 1994, 9, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Huang, Y.L.; Chen, J.; Yan, W.; Zang, D.; Qin, Q.; Deng, A.M. Diagnostic accuracy of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 3137–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Senga, Y.; Kimura, G.; Hattori, T.; Yoshida, K. Clinical evaluation of soluble cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21–1) in serum and urine of patients with bladder cancer. Urology 1996, 48, 703–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Zha, X.; Bao, J.; Wu, Q.; Dai, H.; Hu, C. A combination of radiomic features, imaging characteristics, and serum tumor biomarkers to predict the possibility of the high-grade subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma. Acad. Radiol. 2022, 29, 1792–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Panebianco, V.; Narumi, Y.; Altun, E.; Bochner, B.H.; Efstathiou, J.A.; Hafeez, S.; Huddart, R.; Kennish, S.; Lerner, S.; Montironi, R.; et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for bladder cancer: Development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System). Eur. Urol. 2018, 74, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Noh, T.I.; Shim, J.S.; Kang, S.G.; Sung, D.J.; Cheon, J.; Sim, K.C.; Kang, S.H. Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MRI in predicting muscle invasion by bladder cancer based on the VI-RADS. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 20689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Woo, S.; Ghafoor, S.; Becker, A.S.; Hricak, H.; Goh, A.C.; Vargas, H.A. Prognostic utility of MRI features in intradiverticular bladder tumor. Acad. Radiol. 2022, 29, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Swellam, M.; Ragab, H.M.; Abdalla, N.A.; El-Asmar, A.B.H. Soluble cytokeratin-19 and E-selectin biomarkers: Their relevance for lung cancer detection when tested independently or in combinations. Cancer Biomark. 2008, 4, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Y.; Chen, T.; Fu, B.; Luo, Y.; Chen, L. Survival nomogram for high-grade bladder cancer patients after surgery based on the SEER database and external validation cohort. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 1164401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mady, E.A. Cytokeratins as serum markers in egyptian bladder cancer. A comparison of CYFRA 21-1, TPA and TPS. Int. J. Biol. Markers 2001, 16, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fatela-Cantillo, D.; Fernández-Suárez, A.; Menéndez, V.; Galán, J.A.; Filella, X. Low utility of CYFRA 21–1 serum levels for diagnosis and follow-up in bladder cancer patients. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2005, 19, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Andreadis, C.; Touloupidis, S.; Galaktidou, G.; Kortsaris, A.H.; Boutis, A.; Mouratidou, D. Serum CYFRA 21–1 in patients with invasive bladder cancer and its relevance as a tumor marker during chemotherapy. J. Urol. 2005, 174, 1771–1776, discussion 1775–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gao, R.; Qin, H.; Lin, P.; Ma, C.; Li, C.; Wen, R.; Huang, J.; Wan, D.; Wen, D.; Liang, Y.; et al. Development and validation of a radiomic nomogram for predicting the prognosis of kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 613668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zeng, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Dai, J.; Xie, Y.; Wang, M.; Wang, Q.; Xu, N.; Chen, J.; Sun, G.; et al. Development and validation of a novel nomogram to avoid unnecessary biopsy in patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL. World J. Urol. 2024, 42, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wen, J.; Liu, W.; Shen, X.; Hu, W. PI-RADS v2.1 and PSAD for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of 4–10 ng/mL. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Huang, H.; Huang, Y.; Kaggie, J.D.; Cai, Q.; Yang, P.; Wei, J.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Lu, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Multiparametric MRI-based deep learning radiomics model for assessing 5-year recurrence risk in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2025, 61, 1442–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, B.; Gong, Z.; Su, P.; Zhen, G.; Zeng, T.; Ye, Y. Multi-machine learning model based on radiomics features to predict prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BMC Cancer 2025, 25, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Patient selection flowchart for final analysis. TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1; VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Figure 1. Patient selection flowchart for final analysis. TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1; VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Curroncol 32 00415 g001
Figure 2. ROC curve analysis of VI-RADS score and CYFRA 21-1 levels for predicting 1-year overall survival. (A) VI-RADS score; (B) CYFRA 21-1 levels. VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin fragment 19.
Figure 2. ROC curve analysis of VI-RADS score and CYFRA 21-1 levels for predicting 1-year overall survival. (A) VI-RADS score; (B) CYFRA 21-1 levels. VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin fragment 19.
Curroncol 32 00415 g002
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival stratified by combined VI-RADS score and CYFRA 21-1 levels. Group 1: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL; Group 2: VI-RADS score ≤ 3 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL; Group 3: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level < 1.8 ng/mL; Group 4: VI-RADS score ≤ 3 and CYFRA 21-1 level < 1.8 ng/mL. VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System; CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin fragment 21-1; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival stratified by combined VI-RADS score and CYFRA 21-1 levels. Group 1: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL; Group 2: VI-RADS score ≤ 3 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL; Group 3: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level < 1.8 ng/mL; Group 4: VI-RADS score ≤ 3 and CYFRA 21-1 level < 1.8 ng/mL. VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System; CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin fragment 21-1; CI, confidence interval.
Curroncol 32 00415 g003
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival in subgroup analysis according to treatment status. Group 1: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL; (A) Treated subgroups. (B) Untreated subgroups.
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival in subgroup analysis according to treatment status. Group 1: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL; (A) Treated subgroups. (B) Untreated subgroups.
Curroncol 32 00415 g004
Figure 5. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival in the non-metastatic group. Group 1: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL.
Figure 5. Kaplan–Meier curve for overall survival in the non-metastatic group. Group 1: VI-RADS score ≥ 4 and CYFRA 21-1 level ≥ 1.8 ng/mL.
Curroncol 32 00415 g005
Table 1. Patient characteristics by VI-RADS and CYFRA 21-1-based classification.
Table 1. Patient characteristics by VI-RADS and CYFRA 21-1-based classification.
Total
n = 134
Group 1
n = 16
Group 2
n = 8
Group 3
n = 30
Group 4
n = 80
p Value
(Group 1 vs. Others)
Baseline Characteristics
Mean age, (year)73.074.677.972.370.90.286
IQR, (year)65.0–80.067.2–82.572.3–82.565.8–79.363.0–79.8
Gender 0.926
Male, (n)1101362467
Female, (n)2432613
VI-RADS
Score 1, (n)2102019
Score 2, (n)4504041
Score 3, (n)2202020
Score 4, (n)134090
Score 5, (n)33120210
CYFRA 21-1 <0.001
Mean (ng/mL)2.017.932.231.181.11
IQR (ng/mL)1.0–1.52.53–12.751.93–2.581.0–1.3251.0–1.2
Pathological Findings
T-stage <0.001
NMIBC, (n)9318975
MIBC, (n)41150215
Tumor grade 0.002
High, (n)871662441
Low, (n)4702639
CIS 0.165
Presence, (n)130238
Absence, (n)1211662772
Necrosis 0.052
Presence, (n)2661109
Absence, (n)1081072071
Imaging Findings Metastasis
Organ, (n)75011<0.001
Lymph node, (n)86020
Treatment Variables
Systemic chemotherapy <0.001
GC, (n)2990155
GCb, (n)54010
Pembrolizumab, (n)83050
Avelmab, (n)51031
Enfortumab Vedotin, (n)31020
Cystectomy, (n)18501120.026
IQR, interquartile range; VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System; CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1; NMIBC, non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer; CIS, carcinoma in situ; GC, gemcitabine and cisplatin; GCb, gemcitabine and carboplatin.
Table 2. Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival.
Table 2. Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival.
Univariate HR (95%CI)p-ValueMultivariate HR (95%CI)p-Value
Age1.02 (0.97–1.07)0.4611.00 (0.95–1.07)0.893
MIBC6.64 (2.54–6.64)<0.0011.35 (0.35–5.20)0.659
High grade10.95 (1.47–81.86)0.0204.62 (0.53–40.07)0.165
Lymph node metastasis5.43 (1.95–15.13)0.0010.73 (0.12–4.35)0.733
Organ metastasis7.77 (2.80–21.58)<0.0011.91 (0.40–9.19)0.419
VI-RADS ≥ 49.38 (3.13–28.13)<0.001N/AN/A
CYFRA 21-1 ≥ 1.8 ng/mL9.13 (3.71–22.50)<0.001N/AN/A
VI-RADS ≥ 4 + CYFRA 21-1 ≥ 1.8 ng/mL14.69 (5.99–36.00)<0.0017.51 (2.12–26.62)0.002
N/A: Not included in multivariate analysis due to multicollinearity with the combined variable. CYFRA 21-1, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1; MIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer; VI-RADS, Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ikuma, S.; Akatsuka, J.; Kaneko, G.; Takeda, H.; Endo, Y.; Kimura, G.; Kondo, Y. Prognostic Utility of Combining VI-RADS Scores and CYFRA 21-1 Levels in Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32, 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080415

AMA Style

Ikuma S, Akatsuka J, Kaneko G, Takeda H, Endo Y, Kimura G, Kondo Y. Prognostic Utility of Combining VI-RADS Scores and CYFRA 21-1 Levels in Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Current Oncology. 2025; 32(8):415. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080415

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ikuma, Shunsuke, Jun Akatsuka, Godai Kaneko, Hayato Takeda, Yuki Endo, Go Kimura, and Yukihiro Kondo. 2025. "Prognostic Utility of Combining VI-RADS Scores and CYFRA 21-1 Levels in Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study" Current Oncology 32, no. 8: 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080415

APA Style

Ikuma, S., Akatsuka, J., Kaneko, G., Takeda, H., Endo, Y., Kimura, G., & Kondo, Y. (2025). Prognostic Utility of Combining VI-RADS Scores and CYFRA 21-1 Levels in Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. Current Oncology, 32(8), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080415

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop