You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Current Oncology
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Published: 11 October 2025

Retrospective Cohort Study of Intrapericardial Cisplatin for Risk Reduction of Malignant Pericardial Effusion Recurrence

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Medical Oncology Department Hospital Clinic de Barcelona and Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
2
Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
3
Medical Intensive Care Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
4
Hospital Pharmacy Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
Curr. Oncol.2025, 32(10), 568;https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32100568 
(registering DOI)

Simple Summary

Malignant pericardial effusion is a life-threatening complication in patients with cancer and frequently recurs after standard drainage procedures. Our study evaluated the use of intrapericardial cisplatin, a chemotherapy drug administered directly into the pericardial space, as an approach to prevent recurrences. We analyzed data from 41 patients with solid neoplasms (mainly lung cancer), treated with a standardized, multidisciplinary protocol at a tertiary hospital over a 13 year period. Patients with hematological malignancies were excluded. Our goal was to assess the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of this technique. The treatment was generally well tolerated, with a very low rate of fluid recurrence and manageable side effects. These findings support the integration of intrapericardial cisplatin into multidisciplinary care pathways, making it a safe and effective procedure to consider for managing malignant pericardial effusion in patients with solid tumours.

Abstract

Malignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a life-threatening condition in patients with cancer, with common recurrences after simple pericardiocentesis. Consequently, the intrapericardial instillation of sclerosing or cytotoxic agents has been explored, with limited evidence from small studies with different methodologies. We undertook an observational, retrospective, single-centre study, including all patients diagnosed with a solid neoplasm and clinically significant and/or recurrent, cytology-confirmed MPE, treated with Intrapericardial Instillation of Cisplatin (IPIC), between 2009 and 2022. Patients with hematological malignancies were excluded. The procedure followed a multidisciplinary approach and a standardized protocol. Variables collected included baseline patient characteristics, neoplasm details, MPE impact, adverse events (AEs) from procedures (pericardiocentesis and IPIC) and outcomes (time to MPE recurrence and survival). This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines. A total of 41 patients were included, 51% female, with a median age of 61 (51–69) years. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the predominant primary tumour (78%) and in 44% of the cohort, MPE was identified at cancer diagnosis. Most patients (90.2%) presented symptoms related to MPE at diagnosis, and 88% had cardiac tamponade on echocardiography. IPIC was administered a median of four times. IPIC-related AEs occurred in 10 patients (24.4%), with transient atrial fibrillation (AF) being the most frequent one. Two patients (4.9%) experienced MPE recurrence within 30 days after IPIC. The median survival time from MPE diagnosis was 161 days (5.4 months; IQR 73–455 days). IPIC appears to be a feasible, effective and safe option for reducing the risk of MPE recurrence, mainly in NSCLC.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.