Next Article in Journal
Nonsurgical Management of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Clinical Practice Guideline
Previous Article in Journal
A Catalyst for Transforming Health Systems and Person-Centred Care: Canadian National Position Statement on Patient-Reported Outcomes
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

How Is Best Supportive Care Provided in Clinical Trials for Patients with Advanced Cancer? A Review of Registered Protocols of Clinical Trials

by
Á. Sanz Rubiales
1,
M.E. Sánchez-Gutiérrez
2,*,
L.A. Flores Pérez
3 and
M.L. del Valle Rivero
4
1
Hospital Universitario del Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
2
Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
3
Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain
4
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27(2), 100-105; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5365
Submission received: 5 February 2020 / Revised: 4 March 2020 / Accepted: 3 April 2020 / Published: 1 May 2020

Abstract

Background: In 2012, 11 standards describing best supportive care (BSC) in clinical trials in advanced cancer were defined through consensus statements. The consensus included 15 key components. Our objective was to analyze whether clinical trials that involved patients with advanced cancer and that included BSC in at least 1 arm met the standards and contained the key components. Methods: We reviewed clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, the ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number) registry, the EU Clinical Trials Register, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for 2012–2018. We selected only phase iii studies in patients with advanced cancer that included BSC in at least 1 arm. We describe the characteristics of the trials, together with the definition and components of BSC. We analyzed how the trials met the standards and adopted the key components of BSC. Results: Of 193 trials retrieved, only 64 met the inclusion criteria; 36 of those trials (56%) had no definition of BSC. Less than 7% of the trials included even 3 of the 8 BSC standards that were defined to be included in the design of trials. Furthermore, trials mentioned only 5 of the 15 key components that the consensus defined to be fundamental, with symptom management appearing in 22% of trials and the other 4 components appearing in less than 8%. Summary: Most clinical trials registered during 2012–2018 that involved patients with cancer and an arm with BSC did not define the BSC concept. Hence, the design of those trials does not meet the consensus recommendations.
Keywords: clinical trials; hospice care; neoplasms; symptom assessment; quality of life; comprehensive health care clinical trials; hospice care; neoplasms; symptom assessment; quality of life; comprehensive health care

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanz Rubiales, Á.; Sánchez-Gutiérrez, M.E.; Flores Pérez, L.A.; del Valle Rivero, M.L. How Is Best Supportive Care Provided in Clinical Trials for Patients with Advanced Cancer? A Review of Registered Protocols of Clinical Trials. Curr. Oncol. 2020, 27, 100-105. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5365

AMA Style

Sanz Rubiales Á, Sánchez-Gutiérrez ME, Flores Pérez LA, del Valle Rivero ML. How Is Best Supportive Care Provided in Clinical Trials for Patients with Advanced Cancer? A Review of Registered Protocols of Clinical Trials. Current Oncology. 2020; 27(2):100-105. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanz Rubiales, Á., M.E. Sánchez-Gutiérrez, L.A. Flores Pérez, and M.L. del Valle Rivero. 2020. "How Is Best Supportive Care Provided in Clinical Trials for Patients with Advanced Cancer? A Review of Registered Protocols of Clinical Trials" Current Oncology 27, no. 2: 100-105. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.27.5365

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop