Next Article in Journal
Personalizing Post-Treatment Cancer Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Needs and Preferences of Well Survivors of Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Significance of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition–Related Molecules in Lung Adenocarcinoma
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Area-Level Income Disparities in Colorectal Screening in Canada: Evidence to Inform Future Surveillance

by
A. Blair
1,2,
L. Gauvin
1,2,
S. Ouédraogo
1,2 and
Geetanjali D. Datta
1,2
1
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l’Université de Montréal Montreal, QC, Canada
2
Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 850 rue Saint-Denis, Tour St-Antoine, S03-456, Montreal, QC H2X A09, Canada
Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26(2), 128-137; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4279
Submission received: 5 January 2019 / Revised: 2 February 2019 / Accepted: 9 March 2019 / Published: 1 April 2019

Abstract

Background: Participation in colorectal screening remains low even in countries with universal health coverage. Area-level determinants of low screening participation in Canada remain poorly understood. Methods: We assessed the association between area-level income and two indicators of colorectal screening (having never been screened, having not been screened recently) by linking census-derived local area-level income data with self-reported screening data from urban-dwelling respondents to the Canadian Community Health Survey (50–75 years of age, cycles 2005 and 2007, n = 18,362) who reported no known risk factors for colorectal cancer. Generalized estimating equation Poisson models estimated the prevalence ratios and differences for having never been screened and having not been screened recently, adjusting for individual-level income, education, marital status, having a regular physician, age, and sex. Results: About 53% of the study population had never been screened. Among individuals who had ever been screened, 35% had been screened recently. Adjusting for covariates, lower area-level income was associated with having never been screened [covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios: 1.24 for quartile 1; 95% confidence limits (cl): 1.16, 1.34; 1.25 for quartile 2; 95% cl: 1.15, 1.33; 1.15 for quartile 3; 95% cl: 1.08, 1.23]. Among individuals who had been screened in their lifetime, area-level income was not associated with having not been screened recently. Conclusions: Lower area-level income is associated with having never been screened for colorectal cancer even after adjusting for individual socioeconomic factors. Those findings highlight the potential importance of socioeconomic contexts for colorectal screening initiation and merit attention in both future research and surveillance efforts.
Keywords: cancer prevention; screening; inequalities; epidemiology; public health; neighborhoods cancer prevention; screening; inequalities; epidemiology; public health; neighborhoods

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Blair, A.; Gauvin, L.; Ouédraogo, S.; Datta, G.D. Area-Level Income Disparities in Colorectal Screening in Canada: Evidence to Inform Future Surveillance. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 128-137. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4279

AMA Style

Blair A, Gauvin L, Ouédraogo S, Datta GD. Area-Level Income Disparities in Colorectal Screening in Canada: Evidence to Inform Future Surveillance. Current Oncology. 2019; 26(2):128-137. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Blair, A., L. Gauvin, S. Ouédraogo, and Geetanjali D. Datta. 2019. "Area-Level Income Disparities in Colorectal Screening in Canada: Evidence to Inform Future Surveillance" Current Oncology 26, no. 2: 128-137. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4279

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop