Next Article in Journal
The Trastuzumab and Vinorelbine Combination: An Alternative to Taxane-Based Chemotherapy for Early-Stage and Locally Advanced HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Population-Based Utilization of Radiation Therapy by a Canadian Breast Cancer Cohort
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shame, Guilt, and Communication in Lung Cancer Patients and Their Partners

1
University of Calgary, Department of Psychology, Calgary, AB, Canada
2
Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
3
The University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
4
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21(5), 718-722; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.2034
Submission received: 9 July 2014 / Revised: 3 August 2014 / Accepted: 6 September 2014 / Published: 1 October 2014

Abstract

Lung cancer patients report the highest distress levels of all cancer groups. In addition to poor prognosis, the self-blame and stigma associated with smoking might partially account for that distress and prevent patients from requesting help and communicating with their partners. The present study used innovative methods to investigate potential links of shame and guilt in lung cancer recovery with distress and marital adjustment. A specific emphasis was an examination of the impact of shame on partner communication. Lung cancer patients (n = 8) and their partners (n = 8) completed questionnaires and interviews that were videotaped. We report descriptive statistics and Spearman correlations between shame and guilt, relationship talk, marital satisfaction, distress, and smoking status. We coded the interviews for nonverbal expressions of shame. Greater self-reported shame was associated with decreased relationship-talk frequency and marital satisfaction, and with increased depression and smoking behaviour. Nonverbal shame behaviour also correlated with higher depression and increased smoking behaviour. Guilt results were more mixed. More recent smoking behaviour also correlated with higher depression. At a time when lung cancer patients often do not request help for distress, possibly because of shame, our preliminary study suggests that shame can also disrupt important partner relationships and might prevent patients from disclosing to physicians their need for psychosocial intervention and might increase their social isolation. Even if patients cannot verbally disclose their distress, nonverbal cues could potentially give clinicians an opportunity to intervene.
Keywords: lung cancer; shame; guilt; communication; relationships; smoking lung cancer; shame; guilt; communication; relationships; smoking

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dirkse, D.; Lamont, L.; Li, Y.; Simonič, A.; Bebb, G.; Giese–Davis, J. Shame, Guilt, and Communication in Lung Cancer Patients and Their Partners. Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21, 718-722. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.2034

AMA Style

Dirkse D, Lamont L, Li Y, Simonič A, Bebb G, Giese–Davis J. Shame, Guilt, and Communication in Lung Cancer Patients and Their Partners. Current Oncology. 2014; 21(5):718-722. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.2034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dirkse, D., L. Lamont, Y. Li, A. Simonič, G. Bebb, and J. Giese–Davis. 2014. "Shame, Guilt, and Communication in Lung Cancer Patients and Their Partners" Current Oncology 21, no. 5: 718-722. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.2034

APA Style

Dirkse, D., Lamont, L., Li, Y., Simonič, A., Bebb, G., & Giese–Davis, J. (2014). Shame, Guilt, and Communication in Lung Cancer Patients and Their Partners. Current Oncology, 21(5), 718-722. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.21.2034

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop