Next Article in Journal
A Canadian Consensus on the Management of Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Screening Mammography on Mortality from Breast Cancer before Age 60 in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..

Implementing a Regional Oncology Information System: Approach and Lessons Learned

by 1,*, 2,3,4,5, 6, 7 and 5
Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Division of Preventive Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Intelligent Improvement Consultants, Toronto, ON, Canada
Insightful Solutions, Englewood, CO, USA
ADS Consulting Solutions, Ancaster, ON, Canada
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21(5), 224-233;
Received: 9 July 2014 / Revised: 5 August 2014 / Accepted: 7 September 2014 / Published: 1 October 2014
(1) Rationale: Paper-based medical record systems are known to have major problems of inaccuracy, incomplete data, poor accessibility, and challenges to patient confidentiality. They are also an inefficient mechanism of record-sharing for interdisciplinary patient assessment and management, and represent a major problem for keeping current and monitoring quality control to facilitate improvement. To address those concerns, national, regional, and local health care authorities have increased the pressure on oncology practices to upgrade from paper-based systems to electronic health records. (2) Objectives: Here, we describe and discuss the challenges to implementing a region-wide oncology information system across four independent health care organizations, and we describe the lessons learned from the initial phases that are now being applied in subsequent activities of this complex project. (3) Results: The need for change must be shared across centres to increase buy-in, adoption, and implementation. It is essential to establish physician leadership, commitment, and engagement in the process. Work processes had to be revised to optimize use of the new system. Culture change must be included in the change management strategy. Furthermore, training and resource requirements must be thoroughly planned, implemented, monitored, and modified as required for effective adoption of new work processes and technology. Interfaces must be established with multiple existing electronic systems across the region to ensure appropriate patient flow. Periodic assessment of the existing project structure is necessary, and adjustments are often required to ensure that the project meets its objectives. (4) Conclusions: The implementation of region-wide oncology information systems across different health practice locations has many challenges. Leadership is essential. A strong, collaborative information-sharing strategy across the region and with the supplier is essential to identify, discuss, and resolve implementation problems. A structure that supports project management and accountability contributes to success.
Keywords: electronic medical records; oncology information systems; implementation electronic medical records; oncology information systems; implementation
MDPI and ACS Style

Evans, W.K.; Ashbury, F.D.; Hogue, G.L.; Smith, A.; Pun, J. Implementing a Regional Oncology Information System: Approach and Lessons Learned. Curr. Oncol. 2014, 21, 224-233.

AMA Style

Evans WK, Ashbury FD, Hogue GL, Smith A, Pun J. Implementing a Regional Oncology Information System: Approach and Lessons Learned. Current Oncology. 2014; 21(5):224-233.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Evans, W.K., F.D. Ashbury, G.L. Hogue, A. Smith, and J. Pun 2014. "Implementing a Regional Oncology Information System: Approach and Lessons Learned" Current Oncology 21, no. 5: 224-233.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop