Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Remission after Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Histiocytic Sarcoma
Previous Article in Journal
Excision of the Primary Tumour in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Clinical Dilemma
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimal Prophylactic and Definitive Therapy for Bicalutamide-Induced Gynecomastia: Results of a Meta-analysis

Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, PO Box 59046, Riyadh 11525, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2012, 19(4), 280-288; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.993
Submission received: 2 May 2012 / Revised: 4 June 2012 / Accepted: 6 July 2012 / Published: 1 August 2012

Abstract

Objective: Bicalutamide is approved as an adjuvant to primary treatments (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) or as monotherapy in men with locally advanced, nonmetastatic prostate cancer (pca). However, this treatment induces gynecomastia in most patients, which often results in treatment discontinuation. Optimal therapy for these breast events is not known so far. We undertook a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of various treatment options for bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia. Methods: The medline, cancerlit, and Cochrane library databases were searched and the Google search engine was used to identify prospective and retrospective controlled studies published in English from January 2000 to December 2010 comparing prophylactic or curative treatment options with a control group (no treatment) for pca patients who developed bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia. Radiotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity was also evaluated. Results: The search identified nine controlled trials with a total patient population of 1573. Pooled results from prophylactic trials showed a significant reduction of gynecomastia in pca patients treated with prophylactic tamoxifen 20 mg daily (odds ratio: 0.06; 95% confidence interval: 0.05 to 0.09; p = 0.09), and pooled results from treatment trials showed a significant response of gynecomastia to definitive radiotherapy (odds ratio: 0.06; 95% confidence interval: 0.01 to 0.24; p < 0.0001). Aromatase inhibitors and weekly tamoxifen were not found to be effective as prophylactic and curative options. For the radiotherapy, skin-to-heart distance was found to be an important risk factor for cardiotoxicity (p = 0.006). A funnel plot of the meta-analysis showed significant heterogeneity (Egger test p < 0.00001) because of low sample size. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests using prophylactic tamoxifen 20 mg daily as the first-line preventive measure and radiotherapy as the first-line treatment option for bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia. Aromatase inhibitors and weekly tamoxifen are not recommended.
Keywords: meta-analysis; bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia; prostate cancer meta-analysis; bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia; prostate cancer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tunio, M.A.; Al-Asiri, M.; Al-Amro, A.; Bayoumi, Y.; Fareed, M. Optimal Prophylactic and Definitive Therapy for Bicalutamide-Induced Gynecomastia: Results of a Meta-analysis. Curr. Oncol. 2012, 19, 280-288. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.993

AMA Style

Tunio MA, Al-Asiri M, Al-Amro A, Bayoumi Y, Fareed M. Optimal Prophylactic and Definitive Therapy for Bicalutamide-Induced Gynecomastia: Results of a Meta-analysis. Current Oncology. 2012; 19(4):280-288. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.993

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tunio, M.A., M. Al-Asiri, A. Al-Amro, Y. Bayoumi, and M. Fareed. 2012. "Optimal Prophylactic and Definitive Therapy for Bicalutamide-Induced Gynecomastia: Results of a Meta-analysis" Current Oncology 19, no. 4: 280-288. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.993

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop