Next Article in Journal
Kardiale Resynchronisationstherapie: «Real World»-Erfahrungen Eines Tertiären Zentrums in der Schweiz
Previous Article in Journal
Zahlenmystik Rund Ums Herz—Und Was Daraus zu Lernen Wäre
 
 
Cardiovascular Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Editores Medicorum Helveticorum (EMH).
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interventional Cardiology in Switzerland during the Years 2008 and 2009

by
Micha T. Maeder
1,*,
Stephan Windecker
2,
Giovanni Pedrazzini
3,
Marco Roffi
4,
Christoph A. Kaiser
5,
Jean-Christoph Stauffer
6,
Hans Rickli
7 and
On behalf of the Working Group “Interventional Cardiology and Acute Coronary Syndrome”
1
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Rorschacherstrasse 95, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland
2
Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
4
Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
5
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
6
Department of Cardiology, University and Hospital Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
7
Cardiology Department, HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, CH-9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cardiovasc. Med. 2010, 13(12), 370; https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2010.01544
Submission received: 15 September 2010 / Revised: 15 October 2010 / Accepted: 15 November 2010 / Published: 15 December 2010

Abstract

Background: Since 1987 a nationwide annual survey of percutaneous cardiac interventions has been performed in Switzerland to assess trends in type and frequency of endovascular cardiac procedures. Methods: The volume and type of endovascular cardiac procedures performed during 2008 and 2009 were collected by means of a standardised questionnaire to all adult invasive cardiac intervention centres in Switzerland. Results: The number of coronary angiographies (CA; 2008: n = 39 623; +5.7% compared to 2007; 2009: n = 41 592; +4.1%) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI; 2008: n = 18 099; +6.0%; 2009: n = 19 024; +4.3%) continued to increase with the PCI/CA ratio remaining stable at 45.7% during the study period. After a decrease from 2006 to 2007 the proportion of drug-eluting stents (DES) remained unchanged in 2008 and 2009 (72% of stent-based PCI; 2007: 71%). Emergency PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction accounted for 20% and 18%, respectively, of PCI in 2008 and 2009 (2007: 22%). The numbers of procedures for closure of patent foramen ovale (2008: n = 619; 2009: n = 728) and atrial septal defect (2008: n = 103; 2009: n = 152) continued to increase. There was a steep increase in the number of transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI; 2007: n = 18; 2008: n = 127; 2009: n = 277) and in the number of centres offering this procedure (2007: n = 1; 2008: n = 7; 2009: n = 8). In 2009, transcatheter mitral valve repair was introduced in Switzerland (33 procedures performed in three centres). Conclusions: Following a plateau in previous years, both CA and PCI procedures expanded in 2008 and 2009 in Switzerland. After a decrease in 2006, the use of DES has remained stable since and accounted for nearly three quarters of stent-based PCI. Percutaneous interventions for structural heart disease are expanding. In particular, TAVI has been rapidly adopted in Switzerland.

Introduction

Since 1987, a nationwide survey of interventional procedures in all Swiss cardiology centres has been performed annually [1,2] to assess trends in type and frequency of endovascular cardiac procedures. This local data collection allows comparisons with other countries and offers insights into the impact of clinical trial results on local practice. In addition, the survey allows monitoring of nationwide introduction of new techniques such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods

Based on a standardised questionnaire detailed in the 2007 report [2], all cardiology centres performing interventional procedures in adult patients were asked to report the number and type of procedures performed in 2008 and 2009. The questionnaires were returned by all centres contributing data in recent years, although for some centres information was not available for all items. The Lindenhofspital in Bern did not contribute data in 2008 and previous years but did so in 2009. Because the collection of the 2008 data required one year, the 2008 and 2009 data are presented in a single report.

Results

Structure of Swiss centres

In 2008, there were 29 active centres (5 university, 10 public non-university, 14 private hospitals), all of which performed both diagnostic procedures and percutaneous cardiac interventions. Compared to 2007 there was one new centre in 2008, the Clinique de Valère in Sion. In 2009, the Hirslandenkliniken in Zürich (previously Klinik Im Park, Klinik Hirslanden Zürich) began to report their data as a single centre, which also included interventional activities in the Lindberg Clinic in Winterthur. In contrast to previous years, the Lindenhofspital in Bern also participated in the 2009 survey. Thus there were also 29 centres in 2009 (5 university, 10 public non-university, 14 private hospitals). As in previous years, the University Hospital Zürich (UniversitätsSpital Zürich; USZ), the Kantonsspital Winterthur (KSW) and Spital Thurgau AG (Frauenfeld, FF) were treated as a single centre. In 2008, 13 institutions had one catheterisation laboratory, 12 centres had two, three centres had three, and one centre (USZ/ KSW/FF) performed procedures in five locally separated catheterisation laboratories. In 2009, 14 centres had one laboratory, 11 centres had two, two centres had three, one centre (USZ/KSW/FF) had five locally separated laboratories, and one centre (Hirslandenkliniken Zürich) had six locally separated laboratories. In 2008, 47 (2007: 34) operators performed coronary angiographies (CA) only, whereas 143 (2007: 138) cardiologists performed both CA and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In 2009, 41 operators performed CA only and 141 operators performed both CA and PCI. In 18 centres cardiac surgery was available on site in 2008 and 2009.

Coronary interventions

During 2008, 39 937 CA (2007: 37 489; +6.5%) and 18 233 PCI (2007: 17 080; +6.8%) were performed. In 2009, there was a further increase in CA (41 592; +4.1% compared to 2008) and PCI (19 024; +4.3% compared to 2008). Thus, in contrast to the observations between 2005 and 2007 there was an increase in the number of both CA and PCI (Figure 1). The PCI/CA ratio remained unchanged at 45.7% between 2007 and 2009. PCI was performed ad hoc in the majority of cases (2008: 91%; data not available from six centres; 2009: 89%; data not available from two centres). The majority of PCI procedures constituted single-vessel interventions (2008: 81%; data not available from four centres; 2009: 80%; data not available from one centre).
Figure 1. Evolution of coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) from 2005 to 2009.
Figure 1. Evolution of coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) from 2005 to 2009.
Cardiovascmed 13 00370 g001
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the distribution of CA and PCI among the different centres in 2008 and 2009, respectively. In 2008, the calculated average numbers of CA and PCI performed per operator were 210 (2007: 218) and 128 (2007: 124), respectively. The average number of PCI per operator was 164 (2007: 157) in university hospitals, 156 (2007: 154) in public non-university hospitals, and 79 (2007: 76) in private hospitals. In 2009, the average numbers of CA and PCI per operator were 230 and 136, respectively. The average number of PCI per operator was 184 in university hospitals, 164 in public non-university hospitals, and 84 in private hospitals.
Figure 2. Coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in different Swiss centres during the year 2008. The centres are grouped according to their annual CA volume. * USZ: 2649, KSW: 460, FF: 211; # USZ: 1197, KSW: 193, FF: 61. USZ = UniversitätsSpital Zürich; KSW = Kantonsspital Winterthur; FF = Spital AG Thurgau (Frauenfeld).
Figure 2. Coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in different Swiss centres during the year 2008. The centres are grouped according to their annual CA volume. * USZ: 2649, KSW: 460, FF: 211; # USZ: 1197, KSW: 193, FF: 61. USZ = UniversitätsSpital Zürich; KSW = Kantonsspital Winterthur; FF = Spital AG Thurgau (Frauenfeld).
Cardiovascmed 13 00370 g002
Figure 3. Coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in different Swiss centres during the year 2009. The centres are grouped according to their annual CA volume. * USZ: 2797, KSW: 442, FF: 237; # USZ: 1125, KSW: 185, FF: 108; † Herzzentrum Hirslanden: 663, HerzGefässZentrum Klinik im Park: 676, Klinik Lindberg: 27; ‡ Herzzentrum Hirslanden: 1832, HerzGefässZentrum Klinik im Park: 1627, Klinik Lindberg: 79. USZ = UniversitätsSpital Zürich; KSW = Kantonsspital Winterthur; FF = Spital AG Thurgau (Frauenfeld).
Figure 3. Coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in different Swiss centres during the year 2009. The centres are grouped according to their annual CA volume. * USZ: 2797, KSW: 442, FF: 237; # USZ: 1125, KSW: 185, FF: 108; † Herzzentrum Hirslanden: 663, HerzGefässZentrum Klinik im Park: 676, Klinik Lindberg: 27; ‡ Herzzentrum Hirslanden: 1832, HerzGefässZentrum Klinik im Park: 1627, Klinik Lindberg: 79. USZ = UniversitätsSpital Zürich; KSW = Kantonsspital Winterthur; FF = Spital AG Thurgau (Frauenfeld).
Cardiovascmed 13 00370 g003

Coronary stents

Stent utilisation rates in 2008 and 2009 were 92% (data not available from one centre) and 90% (data not available from one centre), respectively. In 2008, during 42% of PCI procedures (2007: 42%), two or more stents were implanted (data not available from four centres). In 2009, in 41% of PCI two or more stents were implanted (data not available from three centres). With 72% of all stents in 2008 (data not available from three centres) and also 72% in 2009 (data not available from one centre), DES constituted the most frequently used stent type. The use of DES since their introduction in Switzerland is shown in figure 4. The proportion of DES varied considerably among different centres, ranging from 17 to 93% in 2008 and from 30 to 96% in 2009.
Figure 4. Evolution of the use of drug-eluting stents between 2002 and 2009. The bars represent the drug-eluting stent utilisation rates (percutaneous coronary interventions [PCI] with drug-eluting stent placement/ all PCI with stent implantation).
Figure 4. Evolution of the use of drug-eluting stents between 2002 and 2009. The bars represent the drug-eluting stent utilisation rates (percutaneous coronary interventions [PCI] with drug-eluting stent placement/ all PCI with stent implantation).
Cardiovascmed 13 00370 g004

PCI for acute myocardial infarction

Emergency interventions in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction ([STEMI]; primary PCI or rescue PCI after failed thrombolysis) accounted for 20% of PCI procedures in 2008 (data not available from five centres; 2007: 22%) and 18% in 2009 (data not available from two centres). In 2009, 26/29 (90%) centres reported PCI for STEMI. Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock accounted for 1.0% of PCI in 2008 (data not available from six centres) and 1.8% in 2009 (data not available from one centre). During 2008, 428 (2007: 435) intraaortic balloon pumps and 50 (2007: 66) percutaneous left ventricular assist devices were used. In 2009, 477 intraaortic balloon pumps and 47 percutaneous left ventricular assist devices were implanted. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 19% in 2008 (data not available from five centres; 2007: 24%) and 17% in 2009 (data not available from one centre).

Adjunctive techniques and special interventions

Distal protection devices were used in 1.3% of PCI cases in 2008 and 1.9% in 2009. An intracoronary pressure wire was employed in 3.2% of cases in 2008 and 4.2% in 2009. Intravascular ultrasound was performed in 3.7% of PCI in 2008 and in 5.0% in 2009. Revascularisation techniques other than balloon angioplasty included rotablation (2008: 77 cases; 2009: 76 cases) and atherectomy (2008: 0 cases; 2009: 28 cases). Alcohol ablation of septal hypertrophy was performed in 11 patients in 2008 and 38 patients in 2009 (2007: 31).

Management of puncture site

The femoral artery was the most commonly used access site in 2008 (87%; data not available from four centres) and 2009 (85%; data not available from two centres). Approaches other than the femoral artery seemed to be more popular in French-speaking Switzerland (2008: 23% non-femoral approaches, 2009: 32% non-femoral approaches) than in the Germanspeaking part and Ticino (2008: 2% non-femoral approach, 2009: 6% non-femoral approaches). Closure devices were frequently used (2008: 39% manual compression; data not available from six centres; 2009: 38% manual compression; data not available from three centres).

Non-coronary interventions

While the number of balloon valvuloplasties for the aortic and pulmonary valve did not markedly differ from previous years, there were a larger number of mitral valvuloplasties in 2009 (Figure 5). Apart from standard valvuloplasties there was a rapidly growing number of novel interventions for valve disease. In the first two years after its introduction in Switzerland there was a marked increase in TAVI procedures (Figure 6). While TAVI was performed in only one centre in 2007, seven centres (four university hospitals, two public non-university hospitals and one private hospital) offered TAVI in 2008, and eight centres (five university hospitals, two public non-university hospitals, and one private) offered TAVI in 2009. In 2009, the majority of valves were transfemoral implants (n = 206), but there were also a considerable number of transapical procedures (n = 71). In addition, transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) was introduced (a total of 33 cases performed in one university hospital, one public non-university centre, and one private hospital).
Figure 5. Balloon valvuloplasties from 2000 to 2009. The figure does not include transcatheter aortic valve implantation and transcatheter mitral valve repair procedures.
Figure 5. Balloon valvuloplasties from 2000 to 2009. The figure does not include transcatheter aortic valve implantation and transcatheter mitral valve repair procedures.
Cardiovascmed 13 00370 g005
Figure 6. Interventions for structural heart defects: closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) from 2005 to 2009.
Figure 6. Interventions for structural heart defects: closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) from 2005 to 2009.
Cardiovascmed 13 00370 g006
The numbers of procedures for patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial septal defect (ASD) closure remained more or less unchanged in 2008. However, there was a further increase in the number of these procedures in 2009, and there has been a clearcut net increase over the last five years (Figure 6).

Discussion

The 2008/2009 survey on the practice of interventional cardiology in Switzerland revealed three main findings: First, after the numbers of CA and PCI had reached a plateau over the previous few years, there was a substantial increase in the numbers of both CA and PCI in 2008 and 2009, with an unchanged PCI/CA ratio. Second, the proportion of DES remained unchanged following the decrease in 2006, and represents nearly three quarters of all stent-based PCI. Third, TAVI has been rapidly adopted in Switzerland.
The reason for the increase in the number of CA is unclear but several explanations are plausible. First, non-invasive methods to identify inducible myocardial ischaemia other than the simple exercise stress test (i.e., myocardial perfusion SPECT, stress echocardiography and perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging) are apparently on the increase. These relatively sensitive tests may have resulted in more CA indications. In addition, the numbers of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) have significantly increased in Switzerland in recent years (e.g., published data from two university hospitals [3,4,5]. It may be speculated that positive CTCA findings have created more indications for CA/PCI too, to confirm and treat significant coronary artery disease. On the other hand, CTCA is known to produce false positive findings, which may also have resulted in additional indications for CA to refute findings from CTCA. It has also been realised that the largest study comparing PCI with current medical treatment, the COURAGE study [6], allows only limited conclusions concerning optimal management in real-life patients because an initial CA was required in all patients even if a medical rather than an invasive therapeutic approach was adopted, and the population finally included in the trial was highly selected (6.4% of all patients screened) and had relatively few symptoms [7]. Thus, COURAGE is unlikely to have significantly affected patient selection for CA.
The very stable PCI/CA ratio indicates that the practice of proceeding to PCI after CA was not significantly affected by the COURAGE trial [6] and other studies comparing optimal medical treatment with PCI. First, it is undisputed that PCI is highly effective in alleviating symptoms of angina pectoris. Second, the relevance of COURAGE has been questioned not only because of the selected populations studied but also because the follow-up time may have been too short [8]. In fact, a Swiss study with a 10-year follow-up documented fewer cardiac events in patients with recent myocardial infarction, documented silent ischaemia, and single or double-vessel disease undergoing PCI aimed at full revascularisation compared to those treated with intense anti-ischaemic drug therapy [9].
The current PCI/CA ratio of 46% in Switzerland is significantly higher than in Austria (39%) [10] and Germany (36%) [11]. A recent analysis of CA data collected between 2004 and 2008 in the United States revealed that only 38% of patients undergoing elective CA had significant coronary artery disease [12]. Thus, indications for CA are unlikely to be more liberal in Switzerland than in other countries with a similar infrastructure. The increase in CA with an unchanged PCI/CA ratio also points to the fact that the larger number of CA is not simply the result of additional examinations based on soft indications, but may reflect the underuse of revascularisation and the expansion of non-invasive testing as discussed above.
The increasing number of CA and PCI may not only reflect the preference for an invasive strategy by patients and physicians, but also raises questions about the prevalence of significant CAD in Switzerland. Repeat CA and PCI in patients surviving an infarct who would not have done so in the pre-acute PCI era, but also more patients presenting with de novo symptoms, may account for the increasing number of procedures. Unfortunately, primary prevention is still not optimal in all respects in Switzerland, particularly with regard to lipid [13] and weight [14] management, which may be a reason why CA and PCI are not decreasing.
Similarly to previous years, stent implantation was performed during the vast majority of PCI in 2008 and 2009. After a slight decrease in the proportion of DES from 2006 to 2007 [2], DES utilisation remained stable in 2008 and 2009. This approach is justified by evidence showing that DES use is associated with a 50– 70% reduction in the risk of repeat revascularisation compared with bare metal stents, whereas the risk of death or myocardial infarction was similar [15]. Moreover, newer generations DES have been shown to further decrease ischaemic and revascularisation events [16,17] compared with early generation DES. Thus, given the benefit of DES in terms of reduced target lesion revascularisation, and the similar or superior outcome in terms of ischaemic adverse events [15], the proportion of DES is likely to expand.
A substantial number of CA and PCI are performed by a non-femoral, i.e., radial approach. The radial artery is easier to compress, and the radial approach has been shown to be associated with fewer bleeding complications and allows earlier ambulation. The drawbacks include the risk of spasm and thrombosis, and the cross-over rate to the femoral approach is higher than the opposite way [18]. Interestingly, the radial approach is much more popular in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.
There is a clear trend towards more transcatheter procedures for structural heart disease. After its introduction in Switzerland in 2007, the use of TAVI has expanded rapidly in the country. Removal of outflow obstruction is the only therapy to improve survival in patients with aortic stenosis. The adoption of transcatheter aortic implantation reflects an unmet need of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis deemed at increased risk of conventional surgical aortic valve replacement, as evidenced by up to one third of such patients not being referred for this life-saving therapy. Favourable procedural results and medium-term clinical outcomes for TAVI in high-risk patients have been reported, including octogenarians, patients with previous cardiac surgery, frail patients, those with porcelain aorta [19,20] and valve-in-valve therapy for failed bioprostheses. It has been suggested that indications for TAVI may widen in the future to take in patients at lower risk [8]. A trial comparing surgical valve replacement and TAVI in high-risk patients is under way (the placement of aortic transcatheter valves [PARTNER] trial [21]). Notably, TAVI is still not reimbursed in Switzerland, in contrast to other European countries including France and Germany.
Apart from TAVI, options for transcatheter treatment of mitral regurgitation [22,23] have become available in Switzerland. Three centres offered TMVR in 2009, and developments in the field of interventions in valvular heart disease will be of particular interest in the coming years.
The number of procedures for PFO and ASD has risen substantially during the last five years. While treatment of a haemodynamically relevant shunt due to an ASD may have accounted for a small minority of these procedures, it can be assumed that the majority of procedures were performed as secondary prevention after cryptogenic stroke. Indications for PFO closure are still debated. It is widely accepted that young patients with recurrence of stroke despite antithrombotic therapy should undergo PFO closure. The association between PFO with and without atrial septal aneurysm and stroke was initially accepted only for younger patients (<55 years). A large observational study published in 2007 suggests that such a relationship may also apply for older patients [24] and may have contributed to the ongoing rise in the number of procedures for PFO closure. Results of ongoing prospective randomised trials comparing PFO closure with medical therapy, such as the PC trial, are awaited and will better define the role of PFO closure in stroke patients [25].

Limitations of the study

A questionnaire-based survey has a number of limitations. Data reporting was incomplete with respect to several items, and some centres were not prepared to present all of the data of interest. Accordingly, results must be interpreted with caution. Given that information on indications for CA was not available, many aspects of the discussion remain speculative. Despite the limitations of our study we feel that these simple data represent a useful indicator of the practice of interventional cardiology in Switzerland. We decided no longer to collect data and report on periprocedural complications owing to the underreporting in a purely cath labbased survey. The long delay between the end of the study period and the publication of the 2008 data is a limitation which reduces the attractiveness of the reports. At the last winter meeting in early 2010 the vast majority of Working Group members acknowledged the value of the annual report and collection of the 2009 data was completed more expeditiously.

Conclusions

After an apparent plateau in previous years, there was an increase in both CA and PCI during 2008 and 2009. After a decrease during the previous year, the use of DES remained stable and still accounts for more than two thirds of stents. The use of transcatheter procedures for structural heart disease is expanding. While in 2007 only one centre performed TAVI, in 2008 and 2009 patients in seven and eight centres, respectively, were able to benefit from it.

Conflicts of Interest

none.

Appendix / local coordinators

Cardiovascmed 13 00370 i001

References

  1. Meier, B. Örtliche Entwicklung der Koronarangioplastie. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1989, 119, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Maeder, M.T.; Windecker, S.; Roffi, M.; Kaiser, C.A.; Stauffer, J.C.; Pedrazzini, G.; et al. Interventional cardiology in Switzerland during the year 2007. Kardiovaskuläre Medizin. 2010, 13, 18–24. [Google Scholar]
  3. http://www.kardiologie.usz.ch/UeberUns/Jahresbericht/Seiten/default. aspx; accessed 15th April 2010.
  4. http://www.unispital-basel.ch/data/Daten_Fakten_2008_0.pdf; accessed 15th April 2010.
  5. http://www.unispital-basel.ch/data/USB_Daten_Fakten_07_0.pdf; accessed 15th April 2010.
  6. Boden, W.E.; O’Rourke, R.A.; Teo, K.K.; Hartigan, P.M.; Maron, D.J.; Kostuk, W.J.; et al. COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356, 1503–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Simoons, M.L.; Windecker, S. Chronic stable coronary artery disease: drugs vs. revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010, 31, 530–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Meier, B. Switzerland reports “courant normal” in interventional cardiology, 30 years after inventing it. Kardiovaskuläre Medizin. 2010, 13, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Erne, P.; Schoenenberger, A.W.; Burckhardt, D.; Zuber, M.; Kiowski, W.; Buser, P.T.; et al. Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after mycardial infarction. The SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007, 297, 1985–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mühlberger, V.; Pachinger, O. Herzkathetereingriffe in Österreich im Jahr 2008 (mit Audit 2004 bis 2009). J Kardiol. 2010, 17, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bruckenberger E, Herausgeber. Herzbericht 2008 mit Transplantationschirurgie. Hannover: Eigenverlag Dr. Bruckenberger. 2009.
  12. Patel, M.R.; Peterson, E.D.; Dai, D.; Brennan, J.M.; Redberg, R.F.; Anderson, H.V.; et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jaussi, A.; Noll, G.; Meier, B.; Darioli, R. Current cardiovascular risk management patterns with special focus on lipid lowering in daily practice in Switzerland. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab. 2010. Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. http://www.bag.admin.ch/themen/ernaehrung_bewegung/05207/05218/ 05232/index.html?lang=de; accessed 13th April 2010.
  15. Stettler, C.; Wandel, S.; Allemann, S.; Kastrati, A.; Morice, M.C.; Schömig, A.; et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007, 370, 937–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Windecker, S.; Raeber, L. The DESIRE-Late registry. What is left to be desired? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2010, 3, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  17. Kedhi, E.; Joesoef, K.S.; McFadden, E.; Wassing, J.; van Mieghem, C.; Goedhart, D.; Smits, P.C. Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice (COMPARE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010, 375, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Luz, A.; Hughes, C.; Fajadet, J. Radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention. Eurointervention. 2009, 5, 633–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Grube, E.; Schuler, G.; Bullesfeld, L.; Gerckens, U.; Linke, A.; Wenaweser, P.; et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high risk patients using the second and current third generation selfexpanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 50, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rodes-Cabau, J.; Webb, J.G.; Cheung, A.; Ye, J.; Dumont, E.; Feindel, C.M.; et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at very high risk or prohibitive surgical risk: acute and late outcomes of the multicenter Canadian experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010, 55, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. http://clinicaltrial.gov/ct2/show/NCT00530894; accessed February 5th 2010.
  22. Pedrazzini, G.B.; Faletra, F.F.; Vasalli, G.; Demertzis, S.; Moccetti, T. Mitral regurgitation. Swiss Med Wkly. 2010, 140, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pedrazzini, G.; Sürder, D.; Mocchetti, M.; Hürlimann, D.; Faletra, F.; Felix, C.; et al. Perkutane Katheter-basierte Behandlung der schwere Mitralinsuffizienz. Erste Schweizer Erfahrung mit dem MitraClip-System. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2010, 13, 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  24. Handke, M.; Harloff, A.; Olschewski, M.; Hetzel, A.; Geibel, A. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357, 2262–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. O’Gara, P.T.; Messe, S.R.; Tuzcu, E.M.; Catha, G.; Ring, J.C. Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary stroke prevention. A call for completion of randomized clinical trials. A science advisory from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2009, 119, 2743–2747. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maeder, M.T.; Windecker, S.; Pedrazzini, G.; Roffi, M.; Kaiser, C.A.; Stauffer, J.-C.; Rickli, H.; On behalf of the Working Group “Interventional Cardiology and Acute Coronary Syndrome”. Interventional Cardiology in Switzerland during the Years 2008 and 2009. Cardiovasc. Med. 2010, 13, 370. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2010.01544

AMA Style

Maeder MT, Windecker S, Pedrazzini G, Roffi M, Kaiser CA, Stauffer J-C, Rickli H, On behalf of the Working Group “Interventional Cardiology and Acute Coronary Syndrome”. Interventional Cardiology in Switzerland during the Years 2008 and 2009. Cardiovascular Medicine. 2010; 13(12):370. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2010.01544

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maeder, Micha T., Stephan Windecker, Giovanni Pedrazzini, Marco Roffi, Christoph A. Kaiser, Jean-Christoph Stauffer, Hans Rickli, and On behalf of the Working Group “Interventional Cardiology and Acute Coronary Syndrome”. 2010. "Interventional Cardiology in Switzerland during the Years 2008 and 2009" Cardiovascular Medicine 13, no. 12: 370. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2010.01544

APA Style

Maeder, M. T., Windecker, S., Pedrazzini, G., Roffi, M., Kaiser, C. A., Stauffer, J.-C., Rickli, H., & On behalf of the Working Group “Interventional Cardiology and Acute Coronary Syndrome”. (2010). Interventional Cardiology in Switzerland during the Years 2008 and 2009. Cardiovascular Medicine, 13(12), 370. https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2010.01544

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop