Filamentous Fungi in Drinking Water, Particularly in Relation to Biofilm Formation

1. Introduction

The issue of filamentous fungi in drinking water has matured. This is a direct result of the work of key researchers in the area [1-11], with a crucial issue being identifying isolated strains to the species, rather than simply the genus level. When species identification is undertaken more can be deduced about changes in biodiversity within locations and with time. The properties of the isolates, such as mycotoxin, pigment, and odour formation, are more reliably ascertained because these are associated more with the individual species than the genus. Furthermore, water contaminated with fungi is of importance to hospitals, where immunocompromised patients undergo treatment [12]: Aspergillus accounts for the majority of infections, with Aspergillus fumigatus accounting for 90% of cases.

Kelley et al. [6] provided a comprehensive investigation of filamentous fungi in US distribution systems. In this work, Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus niger, Cladosporium sp., Epiccocum nigrum and many Penicillium sp. were prevalent. Penicillium brevicompactum was rather frequently detected and P. expansum considerably less so. However, none of these were detected from the two tap water sites, although Fusarium sp. were common together with an unnamed zygomycetes. Very few Aspergillus sp. were detected, including A. fumigatus. Portuguese tap water was studied more recently [8] and Norwegian and Australian drinking water studies have provided important additional knowledge [9,10,13]. To assist the reader, the most relevant reports from water distribution systems are listed on

Table 1. Surveys of fungi in drinking water.

Country, Place, Year	Period of time	Type of water	Main isolation method	Most frequent fungal isolates	Refs.
United Kingdom, 1996	Autumn and Spring	Surface water and network	Membrane filtration, Direct plating and Bating	Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Epicoccum, Penicillium and Trichoderma	[4]
Greece, Thessaloniki, 1998	One collection (126 samples)	Tap water (hospital and community)	Membrane filtration	Penicillium, Aspergillus and Acremonium	[14]
Greece, 85 haemodialysis units, 1998	One collection (255 samples)	Municipal water supplies of haemodialysis centres	Membrane filtration	Penicillium and Aspergillus	[15]
Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia, 1998/9	12 months	Drinking water	Pour-plating	Acremonium, Exophiala, Penicillium and Phialophora	[5]
Norway, 14 networks, 2002/3	December, June and September	Drinking water (surface and groundwater)	Membrane filtration	Penicillium, Trichoderma and Aspergillus	[9,10]
Portugal, Braga, 2003/4	12 months	Tap water	Membrane filtration	Penicillium and Acremonium	[8]
Pakistan, Karachi, 2007	One collection (30 samples)	Water (and fruit juice)	Direct plating	Aspergillus niger and A. clavatus	[16]
Australia, Queensland, 2007/8	18 months	Municipal water	Membrane filtration	Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus and Fusarium	[13]
Brazil, Recife, 2009/10	5 months	Water treatment plant; tap water	Membrane filtration	Penicillium, Aspergillus and Phoma	[17]
Portugal, Lisbon, 2010	4 months	surface water; spring water; groundwater	Membrane filtration	Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Penicillium	[18,19]

.

2. Methods to Study Fungi in Tap Water

One of the most important problems for studying fungi is the use of isolation media which tends to vary among researchers. Examples of media employed are listed in

Table 2. Principal media used for the analysis of water for fungi.

Medium	Composition
CMA/2—Corn meal agar half-strength	Corn meal	8.5 g
	Agar	8.5 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	5.8–6.2
CZ—Czapek Dox agar	Czapek solution	10 mL
	K2HPO4	1 g
	Saccharose	30 g
	Agar	15 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	6.0–6.4
	Czapek solution
	NaNO3	30 g
	KCl	5 g
	MgSO4·7H2O	5 g
	FeSO4·7H2O	0.1 g
	ZnSO4·7H2O	0.1 g
	CuSO4·5H2O	0.05 g
	Distilled water	100 mL
DG18—Dichloran 18 % glycerol agar	Peptone	5 g
	Glucose	10 g
	K2HPO4	1 g
	MgSO4·7H2O	0.5 g
	Dichloran (0.2% in ethanol)	1 mL
	Glycerol	220 g
	Chloramphenicol	0.1 g
	Agar	15 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	5.4–5.8
DRBC—Dichloran Rose Bengal chloramphenicol agar	Peptone	5 g
	Glucose	10 g
	K2HPO4	1 g
	MgSO4·7H2O	0.5 g
	Dichloran	0.002 g
	Rose Bengal	0.025 g
	Chloramphenicol	0.1 g
	Agar	15 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	5.4–5.8
MEA—Malt extract agar	Malt extract	20 g
	Peptone	1 g
	Glucose	20 g
	Agar	20 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	5.0–5.5
NGRBA—Neopeptone glucose Rose Bengal aureomycin	Neopeptone	5 g
	Glucose	10 g
	0.67 % (w/v) aureomycin solution	5 mL
	1 % (w/v) Rose Bengal solution	3.5 mL
	Agar	15 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	6.3–6.7
PDA—Potato dextrose agar	Potato extract	4 g
	Glucose	20 g
	Agar	15 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	5.4–5.8
SDA—Sabouraud dextrose agar	Mycological peptone	10 g
	Glucose	40 g
	Agar	15 g
	Distilled water	1000 mL
	pH	5.4–5.8

. DRBC and DG18 are recommended as general media for the purpose of isolation and enumeration of fungi in foods of high water activity (aw > 0.90), and is therefore suitable for water analyses. DG18 has several advantages; the characteristic colony appearance on agar plates facilitates differentiation of species which makes secondary selection and re-isolation of pure cultures easier to accomplish, compared to DRBC. DG18 also inhibits overgrowth of fast growing fungi such as members of the Mucorales and Trichoderma.

Finally, DG18 does not readily produce substances toxic to the fungus when exposed to light: Media containing Rose Bengal are light sensitive and produce inhibitory compounds in significant concentrations after two hours exposure to light. The current authors recommend low and high nutritional media to obtain the complete spectrum of fungi present in water.

The phenotypic identification of fungi to species level is based on morphological characteristics such as (a) septation of hypha, and (b) the formation, morphology, patterns and branching frequency of fruiting-bodies and conidiophores. Also, the size, form, colour and ornamentation of the conidia are important characters (Figure 1).

Macroscopic characters such as colony form, structure, size and colour are also important. In addition, appearance and growth on different culture media are used for differentiation (Figure 2). The morphological approach to species identification benefit from supplementation with physiological, biochemical and molecular characters. Ideally, a polyphasic approach to identification is undertaken to cover all aspects of species identity [20,21].

3. Fungal Water Biofilms

Biofilms are problematic in water distribution systems as they permit a high concentration of organisms to occur, with the potential to cause some of the problems described above. Their presence can represent a health threat since biofilms play a role in the accumulation, protection and dissemination of pathogens [11,22]. However, the involvement of filamentous fungi in biofilms has not yet been demonstrated satisfactorily due to a dearth of useful techniques.

3.1. Sampling Biofilms

The methods which have been employed were often indirect, where the involvement of the fungus cannot be proved categorically. An example of this is placing the inner part of pipelines in contact with fungal growth medium and allowing fungi to emerge (Figure 3).

Nevertheless, many studies on drinking water distributed systems (DWDS) have shown that the major part of the biomass is attached to pipe surfaces in a biofilm [23]. The studies of biofilms in DWDS commonly face problems such as limited access to the biofilm and difficulty in repeating experiments, since pipe sections have to be replaced after sampling. A solution is to construct sampling devices that allow for in situ investigation of the attached microbial community.

Examinations of DWDS reveal the complexity that will be required of such a system. Several factors are known to influence biofilm development, including temperature, nutrients, residual disinfectant, the hydraulic regime and the characteristics of the substratum [24]. Moreover, various ecological interactions will occur between microorganisms in biofilms.

Since biofilms are complex, laboratorial systems can be very helpful in determining the influence of individual parameters (e.g., medium composition and biocides application). Various attempts have been made to culture biofilms under controlled but realistic conditions, e.g., the Robbins device [25], the RotoTorque reactor [26], and flow cells [27]. However, do they reflect the in vivo situation?

We recommend the use of “sampler devices” to investigate natural filamentous fungi biofilms which were produced for a water distribution system called “Alto do Céu” in Recife, Brazil. They were developed largely because of the limitations inherent in the alternative methods mentioned previously. The devices can be employed to: (1) mimic the real conditions of the water network and yet be straight forward to insert and handle, (2) be convenient for transportation and storage, (3) maintain the integrity of biofilms and (4) allow in situ analyses of the biofilms. The core of the sampler devices consists of hollow polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes within polyethylene or acetate coupons held in place to allow biofilm growth (Figure 4).

The samplers had a diameter of 1.5 cm and a length from 7 to 10 cm. The ends of each sampler form a screw to connect multiple samplers or to close the device with a cap after removal from the water network (Figure 5).

These features facilitated insertion, handling and removal of each sampler device after collection. The “caps” prevent contact with the external environment during transport. Finally, the pipes can be filled with water, thus maintaining moisture and preserving the integrity of the biofilms formed in the coupons. To study natural biofilms, these sampler devices were installed at different sampling points in the water network: a water treatment plant (reservoir; 20,000 m³) and three branch connections within the municipal DWDS were selected (Figure 6). The coupons were removed for examination every 15 days for a period of 6 months.

3.2. Biofilm Detection

The development of non-invasive and non-destructive techniques such as fluorescence microscopy, enables in situ monitoring of microbial biofilm communities. Fluorescence microscopy provides information on cell morphology, metabolism and biodiversity. Simultaneously, data concerning biofilm matrix structure and architecture are provided when used in conjunction with fluorescent molecular probes [28,29]. These data are crucial and are unattainable by conventional approaches (i.e., culturing methods). They contribute to the understanding of “real time” microbial ecology within biofilms. In this context, samplers and real samples collected from Alto do Céu were used. The suitability of Calcofluor White MR2 (CW) staining for morphological characterisation, FUN1 for viability and Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH) for diversity studies were investigated following the protocol presented in Figure 7.

A description of the various stains employed now follows: (1) CW is a fluorescent probe capable of making hydrogen bonds with β-(1→4) and β-(1→3) polysaccharides. CW consists of a symmetrical molecule with two triazole rings and two primary alcohol functions on both sides of an ethylene bridge. The fluorophore shows a high affinity for chitin forming hydrogen bonds with free hydroxyl groups which stains fungal cell walls blue. (2) FUN1 stain discriminates fungal dead cells which have a diffuse yellow-green fluorescence, from the metabolically active cells which have red Cylindrical Intra-Vacuolar Structures (CIVS). (3) For taxon diversity the (a) universal rRNA probe specific for Eukarya EUK516 (5′-ACCAGACTTGCCCTCC-3′, MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) labelled with the red Cy3 at the 5′ terminal and (b) FUN1429 probe specific for Eumycota (5′-GTGATGTACTCGCTGGCC-3′, MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) labelled with Oregon-Green at the 5′ terminal for FISH were employed.

A Olympus BX51 epifluorescent microscope, using UV light equipped with 40x/0.30 and 10x/0.65 objectives and a filter set (EX 450-490 nm, EM 520), was used for detecting in situ biofilms after fluorescent staining techniques were applied. The images were acquired with a Zeiss AxioCam HRc colour camera using the software CellB^®. Storage and handling of reagents were performed as recommended by the supplier. The sampler study shows presumptive filamentous fungi stained with CW colonising the polyethylene coupons after 90 days in contact with water (Figure 8).

Due to the polyethylene PVC autofluorescence, the coupons inside of the samplers were replaced by acetate coupons which have much less autofluorescesce. Notwithstanding this, biofilms were not detected on acetate surfaces of coupons after CW staining.

These unexpected results could occur for several reasons. Acetate coupons are not the optimal surfaces to promote biofilm adhesion, perhaps due to their hydrophobic properties. Alternatively, the length of time of the exposure may be inadequate for the described circumstances. These possibilities require further investigations and other materials also are required to be investigated. In contrast, when CW was applied to the actual replaced pipe samples, filamentous fungi were clearly observed (Figure 9).

Since the real pipes demonstrated filamentous fungi within the biofilm and deposits, the stepwise approach, as defined in Figure 7, was continued. The FUN1 staining for viability showed red CIVS inside of the fungal vacuoles (Figure 10) demonstrating that the fungi were viable in the biofilm. The CIVS are ATP-dependent which is correlated with fungal viability.

To confirm that the filamentous structures in the pipes were fungi, the samples were submitted to analysis by FISH probes. Figure 11 demonstrates a clear relationship between the CW filamentous structures presented on biofilms with the positive signals for FISH probes. The EUK516 probe shows that eukaryotic microorganisms were present and the FUN1429 probe confirm that these were fungi.

4. Conclusions and Recommended Procedures

The present work is an updated overview concerning the main topics related to filamentous fungal contamination of water distribution system and in relation to biofilm formation. Standard methods are required, equivalent to those that exist for bacterial contamination of drinking water. The methods developed for fungal water biofilms demonstrated the presence of these microorganisms in the biofilms. Recommended standard methods for fungi have been developed and tested by the authors, and may be used to analyse water distribution systems for the occurrence of filamentous fungi [11]. The isolation method is based on NS 4716 [30] with some modifications, consist of filtering 100 mL of the water through a 0.45 μm membrane, placing the membrane on dichloran 18% glycerol agar (DG18) plates and incubating the plates at 20 ºC for 1–2 weeks. The plates must be checked visually every week, the colonies counted and the results presented as colony forming units (CFU)/100 mL water. Isolation of pure single colonies is required for identification, and pure cultures must be subcultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or malt extract agar (MEA) (Table 2).

To determine total filamentous fungi, the water sample must be filtered through two 0.45 μm membranes. The membranes are to be placed on neopeptone glucose rose Bengal aureomycin agar (NGRBA) with 5 replicates for filamentous fungal isolation and colony counting. The second filter should be placed onto half strength cornmeal agar (CMA/2) with five replicates for the same purposes. The method devised by us for the analysis of fungal biofilms in Brazil is also recommended more generally. Finally, even more progress will be made only if future studies ensure that strains are identified to species and standard techniques are employed universally.