Next Article in Journal
Neighborhoods, Alcohol Outlets and Intimate Partner Violence: Addressing Research Gaps in Explanatory Mechanisms
Next Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of Two Motion Sensors for the Assessment of Free-Living Physical Activity of Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Prevention of Overweight and Obesity: How Effective is the Current Public Health Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Do I Look? Body Image Perceptions among University Students from England and Denmark
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers of Non-Exercising Female University Students in the United Kingdom

School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia
Faculty of Sport, Health & Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7(3), 784-798;
Received: 31 December 2009 / Accepted: 21 February 2010 / Published: 1 March 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health and Wellbeing of Children, Adolescents and Young Adults)
PDF [132 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]


Many individuals do not engage in sufficient physical activity due to low perceived benefits and high perceived barriers to exercise. Given the increasing incidence of obesity and obesity related health disorders, this topic requires further exploration. We used the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale to assess perceived benefit and barrier intensities to exercise in 200 non-exercising female university students (mean age 19.3 years, SD = 1.06) in the UK. Although our participants were selected because they self reported themselves to be non-exercising, however they reported significantly higher perceived benefits from exercise than perceived barriers to exercise [t(199) = 6.18, p < 0.001], and their perceived benefit/barrier ratio was 1.33. The greatest perceived benefit from exercise was physical performance followed by the benefits of psychological outlook, preventive health, life enhancement, and then social interaction. Physical performance was rated significantly higher than all other benefits. Psychological outlook and preventive health were not rated significantly different, although both were significantly higher than life enhancement and social interaction. Life enhancement was also rated significantly higher than social interaction. The greatest perceived barrier to exercise was physical exertion, which was rated significantly higher than time expenditure, exercise milieu, and family discouragement barriers. Implications from this investigation for the design of physical activity programmes include the importance, for females, of a perception of high benefit/barrier ratio that could be conducive to participation in exercise. Applied interventions need to assist female students to ‘disengage’ from or overcome any perceived ‘unpleasantness’ of physical exertion during physical activity (decrease their perceived barriers), and to further highlight the multiple health and other benefits of regular exercising (increase their perceived benefits). View Full-Text
Keywords: physical activity; female university students; motivation; benefits; barriers; non-exercising physical activity; female university students; motivation; benefits; barriers; non-exercising
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lovell, G.P.; El Ansari, W.; Parker, J.K. Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers of Non-Exercising Female University Students in the United Kingdom. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 784-798.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top