Effects of Changed Aircraft Noise Exposure on Experiential Qualities of Outdoor Recreational Areas
1.1. Review of the Literature
1.2. Objectives and Research Questions
- How annoying is the sound from aircraft compared to other potentially annoying aspects of the environment in the areas before and after the change?
- To what degree does the level of annoyance with aircraft noise change following the changes in aircraft noise levels?
- Does the perception of other potentially adverse environmental factors change following the changes in aircraft noise levels?
- How is the perceived overall recreational quality of the areas affected by the changes in aircraft noise levels?
2.1. Study Areas
2.4. Variables and Analyses
3.1. Annoyance with Sound from Aircraft Compared to Annoyance with Other Factors
3.2. Changes in Annoyance with Sound from Aircraft and Other Environmental Factors
3.3. Effects of Changed Noise Exposure on the Overall Recreational Quality of the Area
4.2. Validity of the Data
4.3. Substantial Findings
4.4. Management Implications and Directions for Future Research
- International Recreational Noise Symposium: Effects on Man and on the Environment, Queenstown, New Zealand, 20 November 1998; Holger, DK (Ed.) Institute of Noise Control Engineering: Indianapolis, IN, USA; pp. 78–162.
- FICAN Symposium on the Preservation of Natural Quiet, 138th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Columbus, OI, USA, November 1999.
- Mace, BL; Bell, PA; Loomis, RJ. Visibility and natural quiet in national parks and wilderness areas: Psychological considerations. Environ. Behav 2004, 36, 5–31. [Google Scholar]
- Rust, A; Affenzeller, J. CALM—Strategic planning of future noise research in Europe. Proceedings of the Internoise Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, August 2004.
- Anderson, LM; Mulligan, BE; Goodman, LS; Regen, HZ. Effects of sounds on preferences for outdoor settings. Environ. Behav 1983, 15, 539–566. [Google Scholar]
- Kariel, HG. Factors affecting response to noise in outdoor recreational environments. Can. Geogr. Geogr. Can 1990, 34, 142–149. [Google Scholar]
- Krog, NH; Aasvang, GM; Engdahl, B; Osmundsen, E. Effekt av Forsvarets lavflygingsaktivitet på friluftsopplevelser i fjellet—en studie fra Aurlandsdalen; Report No. 3; Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Oslo, Norway, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Driver, BL; Nash, R; Haas, G. Wilderness benefits: a state-of-knowledge review. Proceedings, National Wilderness Research Conference: Issues, State of Knowledge, Future Directions, Fort Collins, 23–26 July 1985; USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-220; Fort Collins, CO, USA,. 1987; pp. 294–319. [Google Scholar]
- Vaagbø, O. Den norske turkulturen: friluftslivets år 1993; FRIFO: Oslo, Norway, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Ruddell, EJ; Gramann, JH. Goal orientation, norms, and noise-induced conflict among recreation area users. Leisure. Sci 1994, 16, 93–104. [Google Scholar]
- McDonald, CD; Baumgarten, RM; Iachan, R. Aircraft Management Studies: National Park Service Visitors Survey; HMMH Report No. 290940.12; NPOA Report No. 94-2; National Park Service, US Department of the Interior: Burlington, MA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Cessford, G. Visitor Satisfactions, Impact Perceptions, and Attitudes toward Management Options on the Milford Track; Report No. 87; Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, GS; Horonjeff, RD; Menge, CW; Miller, NP; Robert, WE; Rossano, C; Sanchez, G; Baumgartner, RM; McDonald, C. Dose-Response Relationships Derived from Data Collected at Grand Canyon, Haleakala and Hawaii Volcanoes National Parks; HMMH Report No. 290940.14; NPOA Report No. 93-6; National Park Service: Denver, CO, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Tarrant, MA; Haas, GE; Manfredo, MJ. Factors affecting visitor evaluations of aircraft overflights of wilderness areas. Soc. Natur. Resour 1995, 8, 351–360. [Google Scholar]
- Fidell, S; Silvati, L; Howe, R; Pearsons, KS; Tabachnick, B; Knopf, RC; Gramann, J; Buchanan, T. Effects of aircraft overflights on wilderness recreationists. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 1996, 100, 2909–2918. [Google Scholar]
- Elias, B. Strategies for mitigating aircraft noise impacts on outdoor recreationists. Noise Effects '98 Congress Proceedings, 7th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Sydney, Australia, November, 1998; 2, pp. 497–502.
- Fleming, GG; Roof, CJ; Rapoza, AS; Read, DR; Webster, JC; Liebman, PC; Valihura, PJ; Lewis, KC; Schomer, PD; Plante, JA; Draper, JA. Development of Noise Dose/Visitor Response Relationships for the National Parks Overflight Rule: Bryce Canyon National Park Study; FAA-AEE-98-01/DOT-VNTSC-FAA-98-6; US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Booth, K; Jones, NC; Devlin, PJ. Measuring the Effects of Aircraft Overflights on Recreationists in Natural Settings; Department of Conservation Technical Series 18; Department of Conservation: Wellington, New Zealand, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, NP; Anderson, GS; Horonjeff, RD; Thompson, RH. Mitigating the Effects of Military Aircraft Overflights on Recreational Users of Parks; AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2000-0034; Harris, Miller, Miller and Hanson, Inc: Lexington, MA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Sutton, ST. Aircraft noise impacts: A case study in the glacier region of the west coast of New Zealand. Noise Control Eng 1999, 47, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
- Krog, NH; Aasvang, GM; Osmundsen, E; Engdahl, B. Effects of noise from military jets on hikers in a recreational area. Proceedings of Internoise, Nice, France, August 2000.
- Krog, NH; Engdahl, B. Annoyance with aircraft noise in local recreational areas, contingent on changes in exposure and other context variables. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 2004, 116, 323–333. [Google Scholar]
- Krog, NH; Engdahl, B. Annoyance with aircraft noise in local recreational areas and the recreationists’ noise situation at home. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 2005, 117, 221–231. [Google Scholar]
- Schultz, TJ. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 1978, 64, 377–405. [Google Scholar]
- Miedema, HME; Oudshoorn, CGM. Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ. Health Persp 2001, 109, 409–16. [Google Scholar]
- Langdon, FJ; Griffiths, ID. Subjective effects of traffic noise exposure, II: comparisons of noise indices, response scales, and effects of changes in noise exposure. J. Sound. Vib 1982, 83, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
- Job, RFS. Over-reaction to changes in noise-exposure: The possible effect of attitude. J. Sound Vib 1988, 126, 550–552. [Google Scholar]
- Horonjeff, RD; Robert, WE. Attitudinal Responses to Changes in Noise Exposure in Residential Communities; Report No HMMH-293350, NAS 126:205813, NASCAR-1997-205813; NASA Langley Research Center: Hampton, VA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Fields, JM; Ehrlich, GE; Zador, P. Theory and Design Tools for Studies of Reactions to Abrupt Changes in Noise Exposure; NASA Contractor Report CR-2000-210280; NASA Langley Research Center: Hampton, VA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Fidell, S; Silvati, L; Haboly, E. Social survey of community response to a step change in aircraft noise exposure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 2002, 111, 200–209. [Google Scholar]
- Fidell, S; Pearsons, K. Sensitivity to prospective transportation noise exposure. Noise Control Eng 2003, 51, 106–113. [Google Scholar]
- Brink, M; Wirth, KE; Schierz, C; Thomann, G; Bauer, G. Annoyance responses to stable and changing aircraft noise exposure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 2008, 124, 2930–2941. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, AL; van Kamp, I. Response to a change in transport noise exposure: A review of evidence of a change effect. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 2009, 125, 3018–3029. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, AL; van Kamp, I. Response to a change in transport noise exposure: Competing explanations of change effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am 2009, 125, 905–914. [Google Scholar]
- Pilcher, EJ; Newman, P; Manning, RE. Understanding and managing experiential aspects of soundscapes at Muir Woods National Monument. Environ. Manage 2009, 43, 425–435. [Google Scholar]
- Carles, JL; Barrio, IL; de Lucio, JV. Sound influence on landscape values. Landscape Urban Plan 1999, 43, 191–200. [Google Scholar]
- Mace, BL; Bell, PA; Loomis, RJ. Aesthetic, affective, and cognitive effects of noise on natural landscape assessment. Soc. Natur. Resour 1999, 12, 225–242. [Google Scholar]
- Mace, BL; Bell, PA; Loomis, RJ; Haas, GE. Source attribution of helicopter noise in pristine national park landscapes. J. Park Rec. Adm 2003, 21, 97–119. [Google Scholar]
- Benfield, JA; Bell, PA; Troup, LJ; Soderstrom, NC. Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. J. Environ. Psychol 2010, 30, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
- Carles, J; Bernáldez, F; de Lucio, J. Audio-visual interactions and soundscape preferences. Landscape Res 1992, 17, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
- Viollon, S; Lavandier, C; Drake, C. Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment. Appl. Acoust 2002, 63, 493–511. [Google Scholar]
- Ulrich, RS; Simons, RF; Losito, BD; Fiorito, E; Miles, MA; Zelson, M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol 1991, 11, 201–230. [Google Scholar]
- Kaplan, S. The restorative benefits of nature—toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol 1995, 15, 169–182. [Google Scholar]
- Hartig, T; Evans, GW; Jamner, LD; Davis, DS; Garling, T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J. Environ. Psychol 2003, 23, 109–123. [Google Scholar]
- Alvarsson, JJ; Wiens, S; Nilsson, ME. Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 1036–1046. [Google Scholar]
- Southworth, M. The sonic environment of cities. Environ. Behav 1969, 1, 49–70. [Google Scholar]
- Becher, LF; Vogt, J; Schreiber, M; Kalveram, KT. Effekte der visuellen Umwelt auf das Erleben Ökologischer und künstlicher Geräusche. Zeitschrift für Lärmbekämpfung 1997, 44, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
- Kastka, J; Noack, R. On the interaction of sensory experience, causal attributive cognitions and visual context parameters in noise annoyance. Dev. Toxicol. Environ. Sci 1987, 15, 345–362. [Google Scholar]
- Fyhri, A; Klæboe, R. Exploring the impact of visual aesthetics on the soundscape. Proceedings of the Internoise Congress, Washington, DC, USA, December 06.–08. 1999; pp. 1261–1264.
- Tamura, A. Effects of Landscaping on the Feeling of Annoyance of a Space. 7th Proceedings of Symposium on Psychological Acoustics, Contributions to psychological acoustics, Oldenburg, Germany, 1997, Tamura, A, Schick, A, Klatte, M, Eds.; BIS: Oldenburg, Germany, 1997; pp. 135–161. [Google Scholar]
- Simon, D; Snow, CJ; Read, SJ. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgements by constraint satisfaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol 2004, 86, 814–837. [Google Scholar]
- Engdahl, B. Flystøy i rekreasjonsområdet på Bygdøy og Romeriksåsen. Analyse av lydopptak i forbindelse med en feltundersøkelse om effekt av flystøy i rekreasjons- og friluftsområder; Report No. 2; Norwegian Institute of Public Health: Oslo, Norway, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Agresti, A. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart, P; Cole, N. In search of situational effects in outdoor recreation: Different methods, different results. Leisure Sci 1999, 21, 269–286. [Google Scholar]
- Krog, NH; Engdahl, B; Tambs, K. Effects of changed noise exposure on the use of outdoor recreational areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, submitted.
- Helson, H. Adaptation-Level Theory An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior; Harper & Row, Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
|Aircraft LAeq 2 [dB]||67||49||43||45|
|Proportion of time over 55 dB [%]||11||3||0.4||1|
|Proportion of time aircraft can be heard [%]||37||15||12||27|
|Both better and worse||1||4|
|Annoyed by aircraft noise at t1|
|not or slightly||rather or very|
|Recreational quality better at t2||43||62|
|Annoyed by aircraft noise at t2|
|not or slightly||rather or very|
|Recreational quality worse at t2||19||70|
© 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Krog, N.H.; Engdahl, B.; Tambs, K. Effects of Changed Aircraft Noise Exposure on Experiential Qualities of Outdoor Recreational Areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 3739-3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7103739
Krog NH, Engdahl B, Tambs K. Effects of Changed Aircraft Noise Exposure on Experiential Qualities of Outdoor Recreational Areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010; 7(10):3739-3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7103739Chicago/Turabian Style
Krog, Norun Hjertager, Bo Engdahl, and Kristian Tambs. 2010. "Effects of Changed Aircraft Noise Exposure on Experiential Qualities of Outdoor Recreational Areas" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7, no. 10: 3739-3759. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7103739