Next Article in Journal
Climate Change and the Rise of Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases in Africa: A Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Voices in Motion: Using I-Poems to Uncover Undergraduate University Students’ Psychosocial Journey and Physical Activity Behaviours
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of a Pilot College Student-Based Physical Activity Implementation Strategy in a Rural Middle School
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Protocol

Enriched Motor Program [EMP]: Adaptation of a Physical Activity Intervention for Enhancing Executive Functions in Children with ASD

Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(6), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060902
Submission received: 20 March 2025 / Revised: 28 May 2025 / Accepted: 3 June 2025 / Published: 5 June 2025

Abstract

:
Background: Recent studies indicate that physical activity (PA) may improve executive functions (EFs) in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The Enriched Motor Program (EMP), which combines aerobic and cognitive exercises, shows potential for enhancing EFs in these children. The EMP was originally created for typically developing preschoolers and includes locomotor and fine motor activities enriched by cognitive stimuli to help the development of EFs in children with ASD. The current study aims to adapt a shorter version of EMP for these children’s needs. Methods: The research will use a cross-sectional, quasi-experimental design with a forecasted sample of 40 children, with the age ranging from six to eight, with a diagnosis of ASD. The children’s working memory and inhibitory control will be measured before and after the intervention. Results: According to the literature, the experimental group should obtain higher scores, especially in working memory tasks. Discussion: This is the first implementation of EMP, which merges physical activities with cognitive stimuli to enhance EFs in children with ASD. It could be used by specialized centers and clinicians to support EFs through engaging activities, and it could be potentially recommended as a best practice for EF treatments in children with ASD.

1. Introduction

Physical activity (PA) is known to positively influence mental health and cognitive development in children and adolescents with neurotypical development [1,2] and those with neurodevelopmental disorders [3,4]. For example, benefits range from cognitive enhancement to independence and social inclusion and psychological well-being, including the improvement in self-esteem, self-competence, and self-efficacy [5]. When considering mental health and cognitive development in young people, it is fundamental to evaluate executive functions (EFs); this is a set of top-down cognitive processes that play a crucial role in cognitive and psychosocial development and support goal-directed behaviors by managing thoughts and actions to effectively and deliberately achieve objectives [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Researchers agree on considering three main functions [6]: inhibitory control, which is the ability to control impulses; working memory, which is the ability to mentally retain and elaborate information; and flexibility, which is the ability to adapt to the environment’s demands. Significant impairment in EF was observed both in children and youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), especially in hot EFs (e.g., social cognition, emotion regulation, and decision making) [12], flexibility, and working memory [13]. Therefore, it is crucial to improve EFs in children with ASD to reduce social and scholastic disparities [14] and enhance their adaptability to changing circumstances [6].

1.1. Summary of the Effectiveness of Physical Activity on Children with ASD

Many recent reviews and meta-analyses have highlighted the positive effect of physical activity (PA) in improving executive functions (EFs) in children with ASD [15,16,17,18]. However, the contrasting results of PA interventions appear to be influenced by several factors, such as the type, frequency, and duration of exercise [15,18]. Regarding the exercise type, a meta-analysis by Wu et al. [18] indicated that martial arts and aerobic exercises are notably effective in enhancing planning skills. Also, aerobic exercises significantly improved inhibitory control more than martial arts, motor skills programs, and no intervention. Additionally, a review by Grospetre et al. [15] showed that although sports and PA, in general, might be beneficial for EFs of children with ASD, some activities were revealed to be more effective than others for enhancing a specific cognitive function. Collective sports (e.g., football, basketball) and martial arts, which involve rapid decision making and high cognitive processing, seem to enhance cognitive functions more effectively, particularly concerning working memory [19] and cognitive flexibility [20]. Moreover, exergames, which combine PA and active video games, appear to be particularly effective for improving EFs in children with ASD [21] while improving motor skills [22]. Additionally, PAs with low motor skill involvement (e.g., stepping fitness and circuit exercises) were proven to still enhance executive functions [23,24]. As for the frequency of interventions, PA interventions with a frequency of three to seven times per week were shown to significantly enhance EFs, especially planning and inhibitory control [18]. In fact, it has been proven that increasing the frequency of interventions from one to a minimum of three times per week significantly amplifies the benefits [25]. Concerning the duration of interventions, recent reviews [15,18] identified a broad range, with an average protocol duration of twelve weeks. Consequently, Wu et al. [18] recommend implementing protocols lasting more than four weeks. The duration of each session should be considered as well, as the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends 150 min of moderate PA or 75 min of vigorous PA per week. However, it is difficult to determine the ideal duration of each session for children with ASD because of individual factors such as age, ability, and sensory needs [15].
Despite the absence of specific guidelines for PA intervention in ASD, recent meta-analyses [15,18] have established a foundation for designing motor programs tailored to the needs of children with ASD. Standardized clinical PA interventions should be conducted for a minimum of four weeks, at least twice a week. They should include aerobic exercises, which are particularly effective in enhancing executive functions, and collective activities, to reduce social dysfunctions.

1.2. Enriched Motor Program [EMP]: A Physical Activity Intervention for Enhancing Executive Functions in Children

EMP (original title: PMA. Programma Motorio Arricchito [26]) is a teacher-led program created to improve EFs (i.e., inhibitory control, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and planning) in typically developing preschoolers based on Diamond’s [27] and Diamond and Ling’s [28] recommendations, suggesting that complex and cognitively challenging movement tasks can result in EFs benefits. Particularly, EMP consisted of 30 units of locomotor and fine motor physical activities (e.g., throwing, catching, using tools like scissors) enriched by cognitive stimuli (e.g., Stroop with animals and fruit, word span, body parts span, a maze). Each program unit lasted about 60 min and included four phases: 1. warm-up (15 min), which included aerobic PAs like dribbling while walking and circular passing while jogging; 2. primary phase (25 min), focused on training motor skills and EFs; 3. cool down (10 min) for relaxing through a fun game; 4. a self-evaluation in which participants rated their performance using emoticons for happiness, indifference, or sadness.
EMP was found to effectively enhance children’s motor skills, behavior, and cognition, particularly in linguistic comprehension and expression, metacognition, and memory domains [26]. During the activity, children are stimulated to process cues and verbally explain their cognitive processes and personal experiences, leading to an improvement in linguistic abilities. Moreover, additional cognitive stimuli introduced during the activities have been proven to effectively increase EFs [29,30,31]. Exercises stimulating the association of complex cognitive skills and movements increased the speed and accuracy of performance on tasks requiring verbal and visuospatial working memory, flexibility, and inhibitory control abilities.
Based on previous studies demonstrating how conjugating aerobic exercises and cognitively engaging exercises are beneficial physiologically and cognitively to improve health in children with ASD, EMP could be a suitable program for enhancing motor skills and EFs in children with ASD, being beneficial physiologically and cognitively. The present work aims to adapt the EMP protocol to suit the cognitive and physical needs of children with ASD.

1.3. Objective and Hypotheses

The present work aims to present an adaptation of the EMP protocol to suit the cognitive and physical needs of children with ASD.
Specifically, we hypothesize that (H1) children in the experimental group would have higher EF scores in the post-test assessment than in the pre-test and (H2) children in the post-test group would have higher EF scores than the children in the control group.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

The present research protocol proposes a cross-sectional, quasi-experimental study design. Sample size is calculated with G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7) [32] and is determined considering a power of 0.80 and an effect size of d = 0.41, as reported by Wang, Cheng, and Li [19], which results in 36 children. Therefore, we will involve 40 children with ASD in case of participant loss. The research presents three phases:
  • Pre-test evaluation (T0). This comprises four standardized tests to assess children’s working memory (two measures) and inhibitory control (two measures).
  • Children will be randomly assigned to two groups through simple randomization. The experimental group will participate in the EMP activities twice a week for six weeks, while the other group will not engage in any activities or interventions.
  • Post-test evaluation (T1). This comprises the same four standardized tests used in the pre-test evaluation phase and allows the assessment of children’s EFs after six weeks.
This research protocol has been approved by the Bioethical Committee of the University of Palermo with the protocol n° 173/2023 and will be conducted respecting the Declaration of Helsinki principles.

2.2. Sample

Children will be recruited through local centers and private specialists who work with children with ASD. The directors and specialists will manage the recruitment process. All parents will receive letters outlining the informed consent and will be asked to sign them if they agree to their children’s participation in the study. The signed consent letters will then be returned to the directors or specialists.

Inclusion Criteria

To be eligible for the study, children must meet following inclusion criteria: (1) to have received an ASD diagnosis; (2) to be between six and eight years old or have an equivalent mental age, calculated by the standardized test, The Correspondences and Functions Evaluation (which corresponds to Italian C.F.V.—Corrispondenze e Funzioni Valutazione) test [33]. This test has 42 items, subdivided into five areas of logical operations: qualitative correspondences, direct quantitative correspondences, indirect quantitative correspondences, direct functions, and indirect functions. Each item has a binary evaluation, with a mark of 1 for a correct answer and 0 for an incorrect answer. The raw data are transformed to a mental age (3–14 yrs) based on the appropriate conversion tables [33]; (3) to master language skills as early forms of understanding, listening, and expressing; pointing to body parts; following instructions, listening and paying attention; the use of names; sentence language; asking questions; and (4) to master motor skills including fundamental motor skills (FMS) of standing alone and walking, crawling, running, walking up/down stairs, and jumping, throwing, and catching. Language and motor skills will be measured through the VABS 2 -Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales [34,35]. VABS 2 is the “gold standard” test to measure adaptive behaviors for everyday independent life from birth to 90 years old in intellectual or developmental disabilities, including autism spectrum disorders (ASD). It is a semi structured interview with the caregiver to measure skills in four areas: Communication (receptive, expressive, and written language), Daily Living Skills (skills to take care of oneself, and household and community skills), Socialization (social relationship, emotional, and behavioral regulation, leisure activities) and Motor Skills (fine and gross motor skills).

2.3. Description of Intervention

2.3.1. Theoretical Framework of EMP

EMP was created based on four principles: simultaneous empowerment of EFs and motor skills, implementation of leisure activities, promotion of social and motivational competencies, and direct involvement of educators and teachers in delivering the program [26].
Physical activities can promote the development of EFs physiologically and psychologically. They enhance angiogenesis, as physical activities increase oxygenation of the prefrontal areas responsible for executive functioning and improve the metabolism and action of neurotransmitters in these areas [36]. Additionally, they promote mental health (e.g., regulation of the tone of humor, reduction in anxiety, etc.) and social inclusion [27,36,37].
Physical and leisure activities stimulate positive emotions, especially enjoyment [37]. Positive emotions tend to increase dopamine release in the frontal cortical areas, which, in turn, fosters executive functioning [38]. Physical activities also increase motivation to participate in the proposed activities, lowering the drop-out rates [26].
Finally, EMP can be implemented as part of educational programming over the long term by directly involving educators.

2.3.2. EMP Activities Description

This research protocol proposes a short form of EMP, which comprises twelve units of the original protocol. The reduction from 30 to 12 activities considered the representativeness of the EFs and the nature of the motor exercises, i.e., gross coordination exercises. Therefore, according to Diamond’s model, equal numbers were selected for the three basic EFs: inhibitory control, working memory, and attentional shifting.
Each unit includes fifteen minutes of initial warm-up and thirty minutes of cognitively enriched activity. The initial warm-up session comprises dynamic stretch exercises (e.g., shoulder rolls, head circles, lungs) and aerobic exercises (e.g., running, jumping jacks). The following activity presents a physical activity exercise with a cognitive task derived from the neuropsychological literature and aimed to enhance one EF between working memory (five activities), inhibition (five activities), shifting (one activity), or planning (one activity). The activity will be repeated with variations to support cognitive function development. The program will be delivered in the form of group activities. The cognitively enriched activities and their variations are reported in Appendix A.

2.4. Measures

Each child will be tested individually in a session lasting approximately 10–15 min. The test will take place in a quiet room and will involve two tests assessing working memory capacity and two tests assessing inhibitory control, taken from the FE-PS 2-6 battery for assessing EFs in children [39].

2.4.1. Mr. Cucumber Test [40]

This test measures visual–spatial working memory and features an outline of a funny alien figure, to which stickers of various colors are attached. After a practice session, participants encounter three items at each level from 1 to 8, corresponding to the number of stickers in the 1 to 8 positions. Levels 1–5 are shown for 5 s each. From level 6, exposure time increases by one second per level. Participants then recall sticker positions on a colorless outline, pointing to the positions of the stickers, with the task focusing solely on recalling the positions. The test ends when a participant fails all three items at a level. They earn one point for each level where they correctly identify at least two items and one-third of a point for each correct item beyond that level. Participants are given an additional one-third of a point for each correct item beyond that level.

2.4.2. Backward Word Span [41]

This test measures verbal working memory. Children are asked to repeat lists of semantically unrelated two- or three-syllable words in reverse order. The task begins with a practice trial (corrected if necessary) to demonstrate to the children how to repeat the word lists backward, followed by the test trials. Each list commences with three items, starting with two words and increasing until the participant fails to recall all three items at the same length, or until the maximum length of seven words is reached. The score is the number of words at the highest consecutive level of 23, which the participant repeated correctly in reverse order in at least two lists, plus one-third of a point for each correct list beyond that length. If a child fails to recall all three initial two-word lists backward but performed correctly in forward recall, a score of 1 is awarded. For a correct response on only one two-word list, the score is 1.33.

2.4.3. Circle Drawing Task [39]

This test evaluates the ability to inhibit a continuous motor response. The task requires tracing a circle drawn on a white sheet of paper with a finger, adapting the execution speed to the examiner’s requests. Specifically, following a first execution in which the child is not given any indications regarding the speed of execution of the task, a second execution is planned in which they are explicitly asked to modulate their motor response, following the path as slowly as possible. The score corresponds to the difference between the second and the first execution’s time, converted into seconds.

2.4.4. Day and Night Stroop Task [39]

This test measures inhibitory control. In the day and night Stroop task, the child must suppress the tendency to give a dominant response to a target. This is a monovalent task where only one feature (the sun or the moon) is presented on a card. The child must resist the inclination to provide a dominant response (e.g., saying “day” when presented with a card featuring the sun) in favor of a non-dominant response (saying “night” when a card with the sun is shown). This task requires both inhibitory control and working memory to recall the rule. However, the demands on working memory are modest and do not significantly affect performance [42]. The score is determined by the number of correct responses provided for the 16 stimuli.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

A repeated measures ANOVA will be run with the two groups (EMP vs. CG) × two-times points (Pre and Post) to assess both main and interaction effects. Specific effects will be evaluated performing post hoc tests, with the Bonferroni correction. Partial eta squared will be used to estimate the effect size, considering the following values: small (0.01 < η2p ≤ 0.06), medium (0.06 < η²p ≤ 0.14), and large (η2p > 0.14).

3. Expected Results

We expect all scores to improve from the pre-test to the post-test (p < 0.05) only in the experimental group. Working memory is expected to show more consistent improvement than inhibitory control due to the cognitively engaging nature of EMP activities, which are particularly beneficial for enhancing working memory in children with ASD [15]. This activity might train specific aspects of executive functioning, particularly working memory, to store and update information [19]. This is particularly true for EMP activities, which conjugate collective physical activities with cognitive stimuli created ad hoc [26].

4. Discussions

Benefits from psychomotor interventions have been widely corroborated in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) because of their poor psychomotor skills and behavioral diseases. However, only a few studies have investigated the physical and cognitive outcomes of exercise programs in people with ASD.
Also in neurodevelopmental disorders, as in typical development, attempts have been made to plan and implement cognitively challenging motor programs to increase cognitive functions through motor exercises. These programs are expected to be efficacious in improving EFs because they challenge the abilities of suppressing incongruent stimuli (inhibitory control), manipulating complex sequences, and updating data (working memory), and adapting in real-time to contextual changes (cognitive flexibility).
To our knowledge, this is the first endeavor to implement a program that integrates physical activities with specially designed cognitive stimuli to improve executive functions in children with ASD. Furthermore, no previous attempts have been made to adapt the EMP, which has been shown to effectively enhance executive functions in children with typical development, to cater to the specific requirements of children with ASD. As a result, the research findings will support the program’s validation for this population.

5. Limitations

Despite its potential, this study has limitations. Recruiting a clinical sample is challenging, as it requires local clinical institutions and private specialists working with children with ASD. Another limitation is that the frequency of our intervention falls below the recommended three times per week, as suggested by the literature on EFs interventions. The reason is that most group interventions complementary to classic therapies, such as psychomotor skills and speech therapy, occur twice a week, as children with ASD typically participate in numerous other activities throughout the week (e.g., one-to-one cognitive-behavioral therapy). Finally, another possible limitation could be the compliance with this program if we consider the significant barrier characterizing the more general participation in Sport Intervention Programs, which is a sedentary lifestyle. Although the World Health Organization recommendations are at least 60 min of moderate to vigorous-intensity PA daily for ages ranging from 5 to 17 years, a large number of children with neurodevelopmental disorders do not meet these recommendations and show low levels of motivation to participate in regular exercise both at home and in educational settings.

6. Conclusions

If this research demonstrates the effectiveness of the EMP, it could be utilized by specialized centers and clinicians to support and enhance executive functions through enjoyable and engaging activities that can be easily administered.
Finally, it could be advocated as a “good practice” in clinical recommendations for EF treatments in children with ASD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.A., G.G. and A.G.; methodology: M.A., G.G. and A.G.; investigation: G.G. and A.G.; writing—original draft preparation: G.G.; writing—review and editing: A.G.; supervision: M.A.; project administration: M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study has been approved by the Bioethical Committee of the University of Palermo, with protocol n° 2758-2024 and was conducted respecting the Declaration of Helsinki principles.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent will be obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available under formal request addressed to: comitato.bioetica@unipa.it.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PAphysical activity
EFexecutive function
ASDautism spectrum disorder
EMPenriched motor program (original title: PMA. Programma Motorio Arricchito)
CGcontrol group

Appendix A

Appendix A.1. Unit 1

In pairs, the children run and pass the ball to one another, calling each other by name while avoiding collisions with their peers. Upon receiving a signal from the teacher, the pairs dissolve and reassemble with different partners to continue the activity. Each child then throws the ball against the wall and is required to name as many animals (or alternatively, colors or fruits) as possible within a one-minute timeframe.

Appendix A.1.1. Variation

Children make a circle and pass the ball to a casual partner. The passer chooses a different category (e.g., food, transportation, etc.) while the catcher must say as many words as possible within a one-minute timeframe.

Appendix A.2. Unit 2

After a phase of running and jumping, children should lie down on their backs to listen to their heartbeats for at least two minutes. Subsequently, the children are instructed to perform specific movements, such as clapping their hands or stomping their feet, in accordance with the rhythm of the music.

Appendix A.2.1. Variation

Alternate sessions by varying rhythms and movements.

Appendix A.3. Unit 3

The experimenter will place two mats on the floor: one composed of cotton tufts, representing the snow, and one made of green stripes, representing the grass. The children will line up and must reach one of the mats using different forms of movement (crawling, walking, jumping, etc.) and touch one of the mats according to the following rule: when the experimenter says the word “grass,” the children must go to the “snow” mat; when the experimenter says the word “snow,” they must go to the “grass” mat.

Appendix A.3.1. Variation 1

The experimenter will use the color of the two mats instead of snow and grass.

Appendix A.3.2. Variation 2

The experimenter will articulate words with the same initial letter, emphasizing the starting sound to give the impression that they are going to say “snow” (e.g., “ssss-sky”, “ssss-snake”) or “grass” (e.g., “gggg-gray”, “gggg-glue”).

Appendix A.4. Unit 4

The experimenter names body parts in a specific sequence, and the child must touch them following the same order. Start with two parts (e.g., eyes-mouth) and increase to three (e.g., nose-ear-mouth) and then four parts (e.g., mouth-nose-ear-eyes).

Appendix A.4.1. Variation

The experimenter names body parts, and the child must touch them in reverse order. For example, if the experimenter says “eye–mouth”, the child should touch “mouth–eye”.

Appendix A.5. Unit 5

The experimenter names animals in a specific sequence, and the child must imitate the gait of the animals following the same order. Start with two animals (e.g., dog–frog) and increase to three (e.g., dog–snake–frog) and then four parts (e.g., frog–dog–kangaroo–cat).

Appendix A.5.1. Variation

The experimenter names animals, and the child must imitate their gait in reverse order. For example, if the experimenter says “dog–frog”, the child should imitate the gait of “frog–dog”.

Appendix A.6. Unit 6

The experimenter places two pairs of pins on the ground, each showing Stroop images of fruits (e.g., externally resembles a strawberry but internally resembles a lemon). The experimenter selects the smaller fruit, and the child runs around the pin with that fruit. The pairs are pineapple–pear and strawberry–lemon.

Appendix A.6.1. Variation

The experimenter selects the smaller fruit, and the child should try to take down the right pin with a bowling ball.

Appendix A.7. Unit 7

The experimenter places two pairs of pins on the ground, each showing Stroop images of animals (e.g., head of a squirrel and body of a snake). The experimenter selects the head of the animal, and the child runs around the pin with the head chosen by the experimenter. The pairs are squirrel–snake and giraffe–zebra.

Appendix A.7.1. Variation

The experimenter selects the head of an animal, and the child should try to take down the right pin with a bowling ball.

Appendix A.8. Unit 8

Create an obstacle course for the children using gym materials such as hoops in pairs of different colors, cones, mattresses, baskets, and other items. When the children reach the pairs of hoops, they should jump into the correct hoop according to this rule: If the experimenter says RED, the child should jump into the BLUE hoop; if the experimenter says BLUE, the child should jump into the RED hoop.

Appendix A.8.1. Variation 1

When the children reach the pairs of hoops, they should jump into the correct hoop. This time, the rules are the following: if the experimenter says a color (e.g., red), the child should jump on the hoop with the same color.

Appendix A.8.2. Variation 2

When the children reach the pairs of hoops, they should jump into the correct hoop. The experimenter will articulate words with the same initial letter, emphasizing the starting sound to give the impression that they are going to say the color of the hoop (e.g., for the red hoop, the experimenter could say “rrrr-rare”, “rrrr-rain”, etc.).

Appendix A.9. Unit 9

The experimenter delimits four zones with tapes (or hoops) of different colors (blue, yellow, green, and red). The children are required to move to the zone corresponding to the color mentioned by the experimenter and perform the correct movement, following these indications: when the experimenter says “blue”, children should make a circle; when the experimenter says “yellow”, children should line up in order of height; when the experimenter says “green”, children should spin around; when the experimenter says “red”, children should roll on the mat.

Appendix A.9.1. Variation

The experimenter will use words commencing with the same letter as the designated color (e.g., “rabbit” for “red”) to indicate the required zone and action, instead of the corresponding color.

Appendix A.10. Unit 10

The experimenter constructs a maze using colored tape to delineate three distinct paths. Seven stuffed animals are placed at various locations within the maze, ensuring that one path contains a greater number of animals than the others. The child is required to select the correct path to rescue the maximum number of animals possible. The task mandates that the child frees one animal at a time, adhering to the established rules while choosing the appropriate path.

Appendix A.10.1. Variation

The experimenter asks the child to free two specific animals. Sometimes, the animals are on the same path; sometimes they are not. The child must decide if it is possible to save both animals by choosing one path. If yes, the child should choose the correct path; if not, the experimenter will randomly select an animal.

Appendix A.11. Unit 11

The experimenter sets up a relay course using the following gym materials: mat for somersault, jump obstacles, cones, and hoops. Children are instructed to pass under an obstacle, jump on one foot, and walk on a line. The experimenter uses two puppets (a frog and a dragon) to signal the children to start running. Only the frog provides accurate instructions. Children must wait for the “GO” from the frog and stay still if the “GO” is given by the dragon.

Appendix A.11.1. Variation

The experimenter tells children to stop while running. Only the frog provides accurate instructions. Children must stop when the frog says “STOP” and keep running when the “STOP” is given by the dragon.

Appendix A.12. Unit 12

The experimenter distributes scissors and photocopies. Each sheet contains two different drawings: a star formed by small moons/a moon formed by small stars, a moon formed by small suns/a sun formed by small moons, a sun formed by small stars/a star formed by small suns, the letter A formed by small Es/the letter E formed by small As, the letter O formed by small Us/the letter U formed by small Os. The experimenter will select one of the two elements present (e.g., MOON), and the children will cut out the image composed of the selected element (e.g., SUN formed by small MOONS).

Appendix A.12.1. Variation

The experimenter will select one of the two elements present (e.g., SUN), and the children will draw the image composed of the selected element (e.g., MOON formed by small SUNS).

References

  1. Rodriguez-Ayllon, M.; Cadenas-Sánchez, C.; Estévez-López, F.; Muñoz, N.E.; Mora-Gonzalez, J.; Migueles, J.H.; Molina-García, P.; Henriksson, H.; Mena-Molina, A.; Martínez-Vizcaíno, V.; et al. Role of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in the Mental Health of Preschoolers, Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2019, 49, 1383–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lubans, D.; Richards, J.; Hillman, C.; Faulkner, G.; Beauchamp, M.; Nilsson, M.; Kelly, P.; Smith, J.; Raine, L.; Biddle, S. Physical Activity for Cognitive and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20161642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Battaglia, G.; Agrò, G.; Cataldo, P.; Palma, A.; Alesi, M. Influence of a Specific Aquatic Program on Social and Gross Motor Skills in Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Three Case Reports. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2019, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, C.; Liang, X.; Sit, C.H.P. Physical Activity and Mental Health in Children and Adolescents With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2024, 178, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Scifo, L.; Chicau Borrego, C.; Monteiro, D.; Matosic, D.; Feka, K.; Bianco, A.; Alesi, M. Sport Intervention Programs (SIPs) to Improve Health and Social Inclusion in People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2019, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Diamond, A. Executive Functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013, 64, 135–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brown, T.E.; Landgraf, J.M. Improvements in Executive Function Correlate with Enhanced Performance and Functioning and Health-Related Quality of Life: Evidence from 2 Large, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials in ADHD. Postgrad. Med. 2010, 122, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Borella, E.; Carretti, B.; Pelegrina, S. The Specific Role of Inhibition in Reading Comprehension in Good and Poor Comprehenders. J. Learn. Disabil. 2010, 43, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Will Crescioni, A.; Ehrlinger, J.; Alquist, J.L.; Conlon, K.E.; Baumeister, R.F.; Schatschneider, C.; Dutton, G.R. High Trait Self-Control Predicts Positive Health Behaviors and Success in Weight Loss. J. Health Psychol. 2011, 16, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Denson, T.F.; Pedersen, W.C.; Friese, M.; Hahm, A.; Roberts, L. Understanding Impulsive Aggression: Angry Rumination and Reduced Self-Control Capacity Are Mechanisms Underlying the Provocation-Aggression Relationship. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2011, 37, 850–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bailey, C.E. Cognitive Accuracy and Intelligent Executive Function in the Brain and in Business. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1118, 122–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zimmerman, D.L.; Ownsworth, T.; O’Donovan, A.; Roberts, J.; Gullo, M.J. Independence of Hot and Cold Executive Function Deficits in High-Functioning Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lai, C.L.E.; Lau, Z.; Lui, S.S.Y.; Lok, E.; Tam, V.; Chan, Q.; Cheng, K.M.; Lam, S.M.; Cheung, E.F.C. Meta-analysis of Neuropsychological Measures of Executive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with High-functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autism Res. 2017, 10, 911–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. O’Shaughnessy, T.E.; Lane, K.L.; Gresham, F.M.; Beebe-Frankenberger, M.E. Children Placed at Risk for Learning and Behavioral Difficulties: Implementing a School-Wide System of Early Identification and Intervention. Remedial Spec. Educ. 2003, 24, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Grosprêtre, S.; Ruffino, C.; Derguy, C.; Gueugneau, N. Sport and Autism: What Do We Know so Far? A Review. Sports Med.-Open 2024, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tao, R.; Yang, Y.; Wilson, M.; Chang, J.R.; Liu, C.; Sit, C.H.P. Comparative Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions on Cognitive Functions in Children and Adolescents with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2025, 22, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Villodres, G.C.; Ruiz-Prieto, S.; Muros, J.J. Impact of Physical Activity on Executive Function in Primary School Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Dev. Disabil. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, Y.; Ding, L.; Zhang, Q.; Dong, Y.; Tao, C.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Lu, L. The Effect of Physical Exercise Therapy on Autism Spectrum Disorder:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2024, 339, 116074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.-G.; Cai, K.-L.; Liu, Z.-M.; Herold, F.; Zou, L.; Zhu, L.-N.; Xiong, X.; Chen, A.-G. Effects of Mini-Basketball Training Program on Executive Functions and Core Symptoms among Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Phung, J.N.; Goldberg, W.A. Promoting Executive Functioning in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Through Mixed Martial Arts Training. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2019, 49, 3669–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rafiei Milajerdi, H.; Sheikh, M.; Najafabadi, M.G.; Saghaei, B.; Naghdi, N.; Dewey, D. The Effects of Physical Activity and Exergaming on Motor Skills and Executive Functions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Games Health J. 2021, 10, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Edwards, J.; Jeffrey, S.; May, T.; Rinehart, N.J.; Barnett, L.M. Does Playing a Sports Active Video Game Improve Object Control Skills of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder? J. Sport Health Sci. 2017, 6, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Arslan, E.; Ince, G.; Akyüz, M. Effects of a 12-Week Structured Circuit Exercise Program on Physical Fitness Levels of Children with Autism Spectrum Condition and Typically Developing Children. Int. J. Dev. Disabil. 2022, 68, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barrios-Fernández, S.; Carlos-Vivas, J.; Muñoz-Bermejo, L.; Mendoza-Muñoz, M.; Apolo-Arenas, M.D.; García-Gómez, A.; Gozalo, M.; Adsuar, J.C. Effects of Square-Stepping Exercise on Motor and Cognitive Skills in Autism Spectrum Disorder Children and Adolescents: A Study Protocol. Healthcare 2022, 10, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Holm, M.B.; Baird, J.M.; Kim, Y.J.; Rajora, K.B.; D’Silva, D.; Podolinsky, L.; Mazefsky, C.; Minshew, N. Therapeutic Horseback Riding Outcomes of Parent-Identified Goals for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An ABA′ Multiple Case Design Examining Dosing and Generalization to the Home and Community. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2014, 44, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alesi, M.; Galassi, C.; Pepi, A. PMA: Programma Motorio Arricchito; Junior: Bergamo, Italy, 2016; ISBN 978-88-8434-778-7. [Google Scholar]
  27. Diamond, A. Effects of Physical Exercise on Executive Functions: Going beyond Simply Moving to Moving with Thought. Ann. Sports Med. Res. 2015, 2, 1011. [Google Scholar]
  28. Diamond, A.; Ling, D.S. Review of the Evidence on, and Fundamental Questions About, Efforts to Improve Executive Functions, Including Working Memory. In Cognitive and Working Memory Training; Novick, J.M., Bunting, M.F., Dougherty, M.R., Engle, R.W., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 143–431. ISBN 978-0-19-997446-7. [Google Scholar]
  29. Carson, V.; Kuzik, N.; Hunter, S.; Wiebe, S.A.; Spence, J.C.; Friedman, A.; Tremblay, M.S.; Slater, L.G.; Hinkley, T. Systematic Review of Sedentary Behavior and Cognitive Development in Early Childhood. Prev. Med. 2015, 78, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mavilidi, M.-F.; Okely, A.D.; Chandler, P.; Cliff, D.P.; Paas, F. Effects of Integrated Physical Exercises and Gestures on Preschool Children’s Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2015, 27, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mavilidi, M.; Okely, A.D.; Chandler, P.; Paas, F. Effects of Integrating Physical Activities Into a Science Lesson on Preschool Children’s Learning and Enjoyment. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2017, 31, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vianello, R.; Marin, L.C.F.V. Corrispondenze e Funzioni: Valutazione; Junior: Bergamo, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sparrow, S.S.; Cicchetti, D.; Balla, D.A. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 2nd ed.; (Vineland-II) [Database record]; APA PsycTests: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  35. Giulia Balboni, G.; Belacchi, C.; Bonichini, S.; Coscarelli, A. Vineland-II—Adaptive Behavior Scales—Seconda Edizione; Giunti Psychometrics: Florence, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  36. Alesi, M.; Pepi, A. Self-esteem and self-perception profile: A comparison between children attending sport and sedentary children. Eur. J. Sport Stud. 2013, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gasperini, I. Crescere e Divertirsi Con Lo Sport. Come Aiutare i Bambini a Vivere Meglio Senza Diventare Campioni: Come Aiutare i Bambini a Vivere Meglio Senza Diventare Campioni; Le Comete—Per Capirsi di piu’ e Aiutare chi ci sta Accanto; Franco Angeli Edizioni: Milan, Italy, 2010; ISBN 978-88-568-2878-8. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bass, R.W.; Brown, D.D.; Laurson, K.R.; Coleman, M.M. Physical Fitness and Academic Performance in Middle School Students. Acta Paediatr. 2013, 102, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Usai, M.C. FE-PS 2-6: Batteria per la Valutazione delle Funzioni Esecutive in Età Prescolare; Centro Studi Erickson: Trento, Italy, 2017; ISBN 978-88-590-1310-5. [Google Scholar]
  40. Morra, S. Issues in Working Memory Measurement: Testing for M Capacity. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 1994, 17, 143–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. DeAvila, E.A.; Havassy, B.; Pascual-Leone, J. Mexican-American Schoolchildren; Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1976; ISBN 978-0-87840-164-2. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gerstadt, C.L.; Hong, Y.J.; Diamond, A. The Relationship between Cognition and Action: Performance of Children 312–7 Years Old on a Stroop-like Day-Night Test. Cognition 1994, 53, 129–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gullo, G.; Gentile, A.; Alesi, M. Enriched Motor Program [EMP]: Adaptation of a Physical Activity Intervention for Enhancing Executive Functions in Children with ASD. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060902

AMA Style

Gullo G, Gentile A, Alesi M. Enriched Motor Program [EMP]: Adaptation of a Physical Activity Intervention for Enhancing Executive Functions in Children with ASD. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(6):902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gullo, Gabriele, Ambra Gentile, and Marianna Alesi. 2025. "Enriched Motor Program [EMP]: Adaptation of a Physical Activity Intervention for Enhancing Executive Functions in Children with ASD" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 6: 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060902

APA Style

Gullo, G., Gentile, A., & Alesi, M. (2025). Enriched Motor Program [EMP]: Adaptation of a Physical Activity Intervention for Enhancing Executive Functions in Children with ASD. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(6), 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22060902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop