Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Physical Activity on Long COVID Symptoms Among College Students: A Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Diet and Sociodemographic Factors on Cardiovascular Health in University Students
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Recommendations for Physical Exercise as a Strategy to Reduce Problematic Use of the Internet and Digital Devices: A Perspective

by
Christel García-Ortiz
,
Miriam Lorenzo-González
,
Javier Fernández-Sánchez
,
Víctor Solano-Lizcano
,
Juan Del Coso
* and
Daniel Collado-Mateo
*
Sport Sciences Research Centre, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(5), 753; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050753
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 7 April 2025 / Accepted: 8 May 2025 / Published: 10 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Exercise and Health-Related Quality of Life)

Abstract

Excessive use of the Internet and digital devices has become a growing public health concern, contributing to mental health issues, sedentary lifestyles, and decreased well-being. Despite the increasing prevalence of digital overuse, there is no consensus on effective interventions to mitigate its impact. This article aimed to provide an updated perspective on current research into problematic use of digital devices and the Internet, and to explore the potential of physical exercise as a key strategy in prevention and treatment programs aimed at reducing such use. Based on the two previous objectives, this study also aimed to provide author-informed recommendations for digital detox interventions, supporting the inclusion of regular exercise, particularly outdoor exercise in natural environments, as a central component of such programs. Thirteen recommendations for physical exercise programs to be included as core parts of digital detox are suggested: (a) the type of physical exercise selected according to the participant’s motivations, (b) exercise intensity and volume adapted to the participant’s characteristics, (c) the avoidance of digital devices during exercise, (d) a duration of ≥12 weeks and ≥3 days/week, (e) the integration of other physical activities for a more active lifestyle, (f) the enhancement of mental health as a main goal, (g) collaborative and competitive physical exercise and sports, (h) the participant’s awareness of the improvements through feedback and information, (i) mindful activities, (j) outdoor physical activities and exercise, especially in natural environments, (k) conducted by multidisciplinary teams, (l) assessments using validated tests and scales, and (m) evaluation of long-term effects. In summary, this perspective article supports the inclusion of physical exercise as a key strategy in digital detox programs by offering recommendations for intervention designs aimed at reducing problematic digital use and enhancing overall well-being in individuals who have developed maladaptive patterns of digital device use.

1. Introduction

The Internet and smartphones have revolutionized communication, education, and access to information, offering unprecedented opportunities for connectivity, learning, and entertainment. In the context of public health, access to the Internet and smartphones has provided significant benefits by enhancing access to reliable medical information, supporting health resources, promoting health education, and empowering individuals to make informed health decisions. Along with their numerous benefits, the use of smartphones, the Internet, and social media has increased significantly in recent years, with daily online activity, texting, and social media engagement surpassing time spent on print media, books, TV, and movies [1]. The use of the Internet and social media has gone beyond entertainment to become fundamental tools for daily living and work [2]. While these tools offer numerous benefits, their excessive use can become overly compelling, sometimes leading to maladaptive behaviors. This growing concern poses a significant health challenge that could potentially reach pandemic levels, especially for young adolescents, as they are particularly vulnerable. The rising trend of excessive internet use and connected device engagement aligns with a progressive increase in physical inactivity and prolonged indoor time, a pattern that was further accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic [3].
In this context, excessive smartphone use and prolonged digital exposure have been linked to an increase in mental health issues [4]. In recent years, various concepts have emerged to describe the problematic use of smartphones, the Internet, and social media. One such concept is maladaptive escapism, which refers to the use of digital devices and online platforms as a means to avoid or escape reality. This phenomenon is particularly prevalent among adolescents and young adults, often interfering with daily life and contributing to excessive use or even addiction [5]. To deal with this maladaptive behavior, digital detox strategies have been proposed in the scientific literature [6]. Digital detox is a broad concept that encompasses different actions to promote well-being by voluntarily restricting the use of smartphones, the Internet, or social media [6]. Despite the potential benefits of digital detox strategies, there is a lack of specific guidelines on how they should be implemented, and there is limited evidence on whether incorporating physical exercise could enhance their effectiveness.
The scientific community has already recognized problematic internet and digital device use as a public health concern, prompting various initiatives such as the aforementioned digital detox programs, aimed at mitigating its impact. However, a major gap in the scientific literature is the lack of consensus on terminology and the inaccurate use of language and diagnostic terms [7]. Although terms like ‘digital addiction’, ‘internet addiction’, ‘problematic social media use’, ‘smartphone addiction,’ ‘problematic online gambling,’ or ‘excessive smartphone use’ are frequently used interchangeably in the scientific literature, they still lack officially recognized diagnostic criteria [8]. In this regard, ‘internet gaming disorder’ is the only problematic digital behavior included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [9]. The absence of a standardized and universally accepted framework for defining digital addictions significantly hampers the development of consistent prevention strategies and evidence-based treatment interventions.
In this context, the scientific literature has frequently extrapolated the characteristics and consequences of drug addictions to digital addictions, given observed similarities in the brain connectivity and dopamine responses [10]. However, this leads to a wrong conceptualization since there are several relevant differences that were discussed by Panova et al. [7]. A key distinction lies in the differentiation between ‘excessive use’ and ‘problematic use’. In modern society, digital devices are integrated into nearly every aspect of daily life, and many common activities such as listening to music, messaging friends or family, or using navigation apps while driving are not inherently problematic. Therefore, when discussing ‘tolerance’ or ‘withdrawal’ in digital addictions, it is essential to consider not only the amount of time spent using digital devices, but also the underlying motivations for use and the associated psychological or functional consequences [8,11]. This absence of standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria for digital addictions, combined with a limited number of studies focused on mitigating their impact, hinders the establishment of a consensus on effective prevention and treatment strategies for these problematic behaviors [8]. Panova et al. [7] recommend replacing the term ‘addiction’ with ‘problematic use’ or ‘problematic behavior’ when describing maladaptive behaviors associated with digital device use, as this terminology more accurately reflects what existing scales and questionnaires measure. Following this recommendation, we will use this terminology in the current study and recommend this usage in future studies.
Although the characteristics and consequences of problematic digital device use may not be directly comparable to those observed in substance addictions, its high prevalence—surpassing that of many common social drugs—and significant impact on daily life and mental health underscore the importance of addressing this issue in the coming years [12]. Thus, this article aimed to provide an updated perspective on current research into problematic use of digital devices and the Internet, and to explore the potential of physical exercise as a key strategy in prevention and treatment programs aimed at reducing such use. Based on the two previous objectives, this study also aimed to provide author-informed recommendations for digital detox interventions, supporting the inclusion of regular exercise, particularly outdoor exercise in natural environments, as a main component of such programs (Figure 1).

2. Problematic Use of the Internet and Digital Devices

The problematic use of digital devices is increasingly recognized as a growing concern, particularly among adolescents and young adults [13,14]. According to global estimates by Meng et al. [15], over 25% of individuals exhibit smartphone addiction, 17.42% struggle with social media addiction, and 14.22% are addicted to the Internet. Furthermore, social networks and electronic devices tend to exacerbate social stressors, such as FoMo (Fear of Missing Out) or nomophobia (fear of being without access to a smartphone) [16,17]. Previous studies have shown prevalences close to 100% for nomophobia in university students, along with potential negative consequences for behavior, physical and mental health, as well as academic performance [18,19,20,21]. This large prevalence and the potential negative consequence of nomophobia is especially worrying among children and adolescents aged 12 or more, which has led to the notion that it is becoming one of the most outstanding health issues in the 21st century [22].
Apart from age differences, some gender variances have been identified, with men being more prone to video game and gambling addictions compared to women [23], while women may be more inclined to have higher levels of addiction to social networks and smartphones [24,25]. Previous studies have shown that female adolescents had a higher prevalence of passive interaction with social media (browsing or consuming content), which may be positively related to eating disorders [26]. On the other hand, a higher frequency of active social media interaction (posting content) may be associated with higher mental health issues regardless of gender [27].
These discrepancies in terms of prevalence and consequences highlight the relevance of the gap in the lack of consensus on terminology and the inaccurate use of language and diagnostic terms. For instance, nomophobia must be understood under the umbrella of the problematic digital device use but should not be included as “digital addiction”, since the prevalence of nomophobia is around four times higher than the prevalence of smartphone addiction. Similarly, including active and passive interaction as the same variable (i.e., under the umbrella of social network addiction) may lead to bias in the interpretation of consequences and changes in research.
Considering the large prevalence and the multidimensional health consequences of digital addiction, an interdisciplinary approach that integrates public health initiatives, educational programs, and digital literacy campaigns is required. Various interventions have been explored and documented in the scientific literature, employing different strategies to mitigate problematic digital use. Among them, digital detox programs—primarily focused on limiting or restricting smartphone, social media, and internet use—remain one of the most common behavior-modification approaches. However, inconsistent findings and a significant lack of consensus regarding definitions and measurement criteria hinder the ability to draw solid conclusions [28], underscoring the need for further research. In this regard, not every digital detox program will lead to meaningful positive effects. A recent systematic review showed mixed results, with some studies reporting positive effects and others revealing neglective or negative effects [29]. This systematic review also showed that this heterogeneity is even more worrying if we are looking for long-term effects, which may involve the acquisition of healthier digital and lifestyle habits. One of these lifestyle habits that has gained attention in the scientific literature is physical activity. Previous research supports that engaging in physical activity and structured exercise programs or sports reduces time spent on sedentary behaviors, such as smartphone use or social media scrolling, while excessive phone use can, in turn, limit the time dedicated to exercise [30]. Thus, from the point of view of the authors, interventions aimed to reduce the problematic use of the Internet and digital devices should consider the potential long-term benefits of physical exercise.

3. The Role of Physical Exercise in Promoting Well-Being and Reducing Problematic Digital Device Use

Physical activity and exercise are associated with higher levels of subjective well-being [31], and they are widely known to improve physical function, cardiometabolic health, bone density, and adiposity profile—factors that reduce mortality and enhance health-related quality of life [32,33]. Additionally, regular exercise fosters social connections and a sense of community, particularly in group-based settings, which contributes to emotional support and a shared sense of achievement, further enhancing mental health outcomes [34]. Among the physiological benefits of physical activity, the reduction of cortisol levels and the release of dopamine and serotonin play a crucial role in enhancing mental health and overall well-being. These neurochemical changes are directly associated with stress reduction, mood regulation, and the experience of pleasure [35,36,37].
Although the benefits of exercise for well-being are evident regardless of the type or intensity of exercise [38], a regular, sustained participation in physical exercise is essential to achieve significant mental health enhancements and this is a major challenge since adherence to physical exercise is often poor and strategies aimed to facilitate the integration of exercise as part of the lifestyle are needed [39]. In this regard, several key factors associated with adherence to physical exercise have been previously reported in different populations, highlighting the need to consider aspects such as individualization, supervision, feedback, and goal setting during the design and implementation of exercise programs [40]. While these factors are critical for improving adherence and maximizing the health benefits of exercise, they may also play a role in understanding the complex relationship between physical activity and various forms of problematic digital behavior, including excessive use of smartphones, the Internet, and gaming or gambling-related activities.
Regarding the benefits of exercise for problematic use of the Internet and digital devices, previous research has consistently found an inverse association between problematic smartphone use and individual levels of physical activity [41,42,43]. Specifically, individuals with higher levels of smartphone addiction or problematic use tend to be less physically active. Similar inverse relationships have been observed in studies examining problematic internet use [44] and excessive social media engagement [45,46,47]. Furthermore, in the framework of digital addictions and problematic digital behaviors, such as gaming, including offline and online videogames, and online gambling, are other activities that could have negative consequences for the users. The link between being active and being addicted to playing games is still poorly explored, but a positive relation has been previously observed [48], indicating that higher levels of physical activity may correlate with problematic gaming. As for gambling disorders, they have also been directly related to physical activity, showing that those with higher levels of physical activity are more prone to engage in gambling [49]. One possible explanation could be that people who are generally more active are also more likely to enjoy watching sports, gambling on sporting events, and playing sports-based video games [49]. However, Angelo et al. [50] found a significant reduction in gambling behaviors after an exercise program. In this sense, further research is needed to gain a better understanding of these types of digital addictions. Despite the varying associations between physical activity levels and different forms of digital addiction and online gambling, the substantial body of evidence supporting the mental health benefits of exercise and its effectiveness in addressing other types of addiction leads the authors of this study to recommend increasing physical activity through regular exercise as a promising strategy to reduce maladaptive digital device use.
Regarding exercise intensity, studies suggest that individuals engaging in intense physical exercise activities are less prone to developing problematic digital behavior compared to those participating in exercise of lower intensity [51,52]. As a result, interventions designed to promote higher physical activity levels through exercise have shown potential in mitigating digital addictive behaviors, with research suggesting that these programs should last at least 12 weeks with three to five sessions per week to be effective [53]. Liu et al. [53] systematically analyzed nine experimental studies about exercise and smartphone addiction and demonstrated that various types of physical activities—including Tai Chi, basketball, dancing, and running—can help to treat this problematic behavior. That effect may be attributed to the ability of exercise to divert attention from the digital world, encourage adaptation to real-life environments, and foster interpersonal skills such as self-control [51]. In the case of sports, they may further contribute to personal development by enhancing teamwork and communication skills, thus fulfilling individuals’ basic psychological needs [51]. These findings underscore the multifaceted benefits of structured and sufficiently intense exercise interventions, not only as a means of reducing problematic digital behaviors but also as a valuable tool for promoting healthier psychosocial functioning and overall well-being.
According to Precht et al. [54], increasing any type of daily physical activity by 30 min caused a reduction in the problematic use of smartphones. In that study, any type of exercise was acceptable, including walking, running, cycling, swimming, or weight training. However, the type of exercise performed also appears to affect its effectiveness in reducing digital addictions. Xiao et al. [55] showed that practicing Badu Anjin (a traditional Chinese Qigong exercise that consists of eight distinct movements designed to promote physical health, mental well-being, and energy flow) and basketball led to a decrease in the rates of problematic smartphone use, anxiety and loneliness among the participants who practiced these sports. Interestingly, those who practiced basketball had larger improvements, while the effects of Badu Anjin lasted longer. The authors suggested that playing basketball would lead to higher levels of dopamine due to competition and social interaction, while mindful movements of Badu Anjin could cause discipline and endurance. Similarly, the meta-analysis by Liu et al. [53] found that closed motor skill activities were associated with greater reductions in smartphone addiction compared to open motor skill activities. In contrast, other authors have suggested that open-skill sports could be the best option to mitigate addiction as they introduce several key-elements like competition, change, novelty, and social interaction, which may be associated with higher levels of dopamine and thus reducing the incidence of addictions by promoting a more balanced dopaminergic response [56,57].
Interestingly, outdoor physical exercise may be more effective than indoor activities in enhancing both physical and psychological health [58]. Activities such as running, hiking, and team sports have been linked to greater psychological benefits compared to indoor exercises, partly due to their immersive engagement with nature [59]. A recent systematic review proved that structured nature-based interventions, conducted in green or blue natural environments, effectively reduce depression and anxiety symptoms while enhancing positive affect [60]. Therefore, outdoor physical activities may be especially useful to be included in digital detox programs, combining them with balanced screen use to enhance overall well-being [61,62]. As a result, additional psychological and physical benefits can be obtained from practicing exercise in outdoor environments [63], like enhancing the capacity of individuals to reduce depression [64], as well as preventing and treating Internet addiction in adolescents [65]. However, the long-term effects of outdoor interventions still need to be investigated [66]. While more research is needed to fully understand the underlying mechanisms, the interpretation of the authors of the current study is that incorporating outdoor exercise into daily routines or intervention programs may be a simple yet effective strategy to improve both physical and psychological well-being. Encouraging activities in natural environments could consequently be particularly beneficial for mental health, offering an accessible and holistic approach to stress reduction and emotional balance, which may be useful to deal with the problematic use of the Internet and digital devices.
In summary, people with lower levels of physical activity often tend to have more maladaptive digital behaviors, as well as worse sleep quality and higher levels of stress than their peers [67]. Given these findings and from the point of view of the authors of the current study, increasing physical activity, especially through exercise conducted in the natural environment, presents itself as a potentially effective strategy for reducing problematic use of digital devices, particularly in younger populations. The existing evidence highlights the potential of maintaining high physical activity levels as both a preventive and therapeutic strategy against problematic digital behaviors, emphasizing the importance of incorporating structured exercise programs into digital detox initiatives. Based on the authors’ experience and interpretation of the current evidence, it is recommended that future digital detox interventions prioritize the inclusion of regular, structured physical activity, preferably in outdoor settings, as a practical, accessible, and multidimensional approach to support behavioral regulation, reduce maladaptive digital use, and promote long-term psychological well-being.

4. Recommendations for Digital Detox Programs: The Inclusion of Physical Exercise

Based on previous research, it is evident that problematic and maladaptive use of digital devices, the Internet, and social media represents a significant public health challenge. However, the current scientific knowledge on effective strategies to reduce both the prevalence and impact of this global issue remains limited and inconsistent. Although previous research has highlighted the potential benefits of psychological (including mindfulness therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy) and exercise interventions to reduce the problematic and excessive use of digital devices [56], the results are still controversial.
On this point, different digital detox programs have been conducted to reduce the problematic behavior associated with the Internet and digital devices by voluntarily restricting the use of smartphones, the Internet, or social media. However, not every type of digital detox program will lead to achieving the same effect. For instance, Walsh et al. [68] found that restricting smartphone use may lead to several benefits, such as higher life satisfaction or self-esteem, while restricting social media could have fewer benefits and some undesired consequences, such as negative emotions. Similarly, a previous meta-analysis [69] based on digital detoxification showed significant beneficial effects of this practice on well-being, while another meta-analysis by Ramadhan et al. [70] found no relevant results in well-being or in satisfaction with life in social media detoxification interventions. Thus, further research is clearly needed to better understand the adequate approach according to the characteristics and needs of the participants.
To explain this controversy, digital detox has been related to the concept of dopaminergic detox or dopamine fasting, which is based on the notion that excessive dopamine stimulation resulting from activities like social media (likes, notifications, etc.) may be associated with addictive behaviors, impulsivity, or attention deficits [71]. However, poorly designed dopamine fasting should be performed with caution due to potential negative consequences on mental and physical well-being [72]. Therefore, future studies should consider that a wrongly determined restriction in the use of the Internet or digital devices may lead to undesired consequences.
Programs aimed to detoxify from the Internet and digital devices largely differ in duration, ranging from a few days [73] to several weeks [74] and in the activities and therapeutic approaches included. Regarding protocols, some interventions restrict the use of digital devices completely or for specific time intervals (for instance, 30 min each day [73]), while others include changes in the device settings, such as turning off notifications and limiting the use of social networks [16]. However, just restricting or preventing the use of digital devices and apps may not maximize benefits. Previous studies have suggested that digital detox interventions can be more effective when combined with other therapies or activities, such as mindfulness [16], physical exercise, summer camps [75], or digital hygiene practices, encouraging interpersonal relationships and promoting technology-free activities such as retreats or outdoor physical activity and sports [74]. Thus, digital detox must be understood from a multidisciplinary perspective.
Based on the previous research and from the point of view of the authors of this article, exercise should be included in digital detox programs due to the well-known benefits in physical and mental health, the promotion of social interactions, the reduction of loneliness, stress, inadequacy, fatigue and withdrawal feelings [57,76], as well as the significant enhancement of self-esteem [77,78], which may be inversely associated with the risk of developing an addiction [79]. Furthermore, outdoor physical exercise may be recommended due to the additional benefits of spending time in natural environments and the need to disconnect from technology to connect with nature. In this regard, the relationship between the virtual and real world has changed a lot in the last few years. The traditional concept of escapism, which was based on using the virtual world to get the feelings and sensations that were not achieved in the real world, has grown so much that nowadays there is a need of an inverse escapism, where people escape from the virtual world through the engagement in activities in the real world and through the connection with nature. Although the potential benefits of physical activity and exercise in real natural environments, including green (forests, parks, gardens, etc.) or blue (lakes, rivers, seas, etc.) exercise, are significant [63], it is a major challenge, as around 55% of global population lives in urban areas [66] with scarce green spaces [66], less opportunities to practice outdoor activities and consequently higher risk of developing a problematic use of the Internet and digital devices [80]. This could be counteracted by changing the design of the cities in a way that promotes outdoor physical activity and sports practice [64] and utilizing specialized sports and health-education camps that exist in several countries [81] to focus on outdoor physical exercise and sport.
In order to extract some practical applications of the existing scientific literature on digital detox and physical exercise, the authors of the current manuscript have interpreted the previous research and provided key aspects to be considered when implementing digital detox programs, with special emphasis on physical exercise as a core component. These recommendations are presented in Table 1.

5. Future Perspectives and Practical Applications

The future of investigations into physical exercise and problematic digital behavior is exciting. Controversial and heterogeneous results represent an opportunity for researchers to expand knowledge and contribute to the field. In the context of digital detox, promoting healthy habits seems to be essential to achieve long-term effects, with physical activity and exercise playing a crucial role. Most existing research relies on cross-sectional studies that use questionnaires as the primary tool to examine this relationship. To establish causal links and draw reliable conclusions, future studies should incorporate longitudinal and experimental designs, assessing long-term effects and including follow-up evaluation [29]. In addition, both self-reported data and objective measures, such as smartphone usage tracking [68,82]. Additionally, further research is needed to determine the specific characteristics of physical exercise that yield optimal results by examining and comparing different frequencies, durations, intensities, and types of exercise (e.g., aerobic versus strength training, open-skill sports, and mindful physical activities). Moreover, the underlying mechanisms through which physical exercise influences the prevention and reduction of problematic internet and digital device use must be thoroughly explored. In the current manuscript, we provide some practical recommendations that can be considered by future research when designing and conducting digital detox programs. However, it must be noted that those recommendations are based on the comprehensive interpretation that the authors have made of the scientific literature.
Another promising topic in this field is the potential added value of outdoor exercise and physical activity in natural environments. In this way, although outdoor exercise may lead to extra benefits on the mental level and on certain symptoms such as depression, the implementation of this type of exercise program is challenging in the context of our indoor generation. The distribution of the population in urban areas and the reduced access to green or blue natural spaces in the cities are a major handicap for people to engage in these types of physical activity. Finally, policymakers and educators should consider incorporating digital literacy and wellness programs into school curricula, emphasizing balanced technology use and active lifestyles from an early age. In order to facilitate these implementations, interdisciplinary collaborations from different disciplines are essential to design innovative strategies that address the complex nature of problematic use of the Internet and digital devices in modern society.
Finally, it is important to note that most previous reviews aimed to evaluate interventions to reduce the problematic use of the Internet and digital devices have concluded that there is a relevant lack of consensus on terminology, highlighting the common confusion among terms such as ‘addiction’, ‘problematic use’, and ‘excessive use’. In this regard, based on previous research, we propose the use of ‘problematic use’ as a broader and more inclusive term that encompasses both addiction and excessive use. Since only the ‘Internet Gaming Disorder’ is currently recognized in the DSM-5, further research and standardization are needed to better define the causes, effects, symptoms, and interventions for other problematic digital behaviors to enhance prevention and treatment strategies.

6. Conclusions

The problematic use of the Internet and digital devices represents implications for mental health, societal well-being, and overall quality of life. In this regard, digital detox programs involving the restriction in the use of smartphones, the Internet, or social media have shown controversial but promising benefits in dealing with this global public health challenge in the modern era. However, long-term effects and optimal characteristics of this type of program need further well-designed studies. Evidence suggests that digital detox effectiveness may be enhanced by including psychological therapies (i.e., cognitive-behavioral or mindfulness therapies) and the adoption of healthy habits. Thus, increasing physical activity and exercise participation may play a key role in dealing with the problematic use of the Internet and digital devices and should be considered in digital detox interventions due to the well-known benefits of physical activity on mental health and self-esteem. Regarding the most suitable type of physical exercise, green or blue exercising and outdoor physical activities offer a promising approach to mitigate the impact of problematic use of the Internet and digital devices and promote a healthier and more balanced lifestyle. Nevertheless, the development of outdoor physical exercise programs is often limited by the urban available spaces.
Based on the authors’ interpretation of previous research, a total of 13 recommendations for physical activity programs to be included as core parts of digital detox were suggested: (a) the type of physical exercise selected according to the participant’s motivations, (b) exercise intensity and volume adapted to the participant’s characteristics, (c) the avoidance of digital devices during exercise, (d) exercise interventions with a minimum length of 12 weeks and at least three sessions per week, (e) the integration of physical activity for a more active lifestyle, (f) the enhancement of mental health and overall well-being as a main goal, (g) collaborative and competitive physical exercise activities and sports, (h) the participant’s awareness of the improvements through feedback and information, (i) mindful activities, (j) outdoor physical activities, especially in natural environments, (k) conducted and designed by multidisciplinary teams, (l) assessments using validated tests and scales, and (m) evaluation of long-term effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.-M., J.D.C. and M.L.-G.; resources, D.C.-M. and J.D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.G.-O., J.F.-S., M.L.-G., D.C.-M. and J.D.C.; writing—review and editing, C.G.-O., J.F.-S., M.L.-G., D.C.-M., V.S.-L. and J.D.C.; visualization, C.G.-O., J.F.-S., D.C.-M., V.S.-L. and J.D.C.; supervision, D.C.-M., J.D.C. and M.L.-G.; project administration, D.C.-M. and J.D.C.; funding acquisition, D.C.-M. and J.D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (Spanish Ministry of Consumer Affairs). Ref: SUBV23/00031 and SUBV24/00031. J.F-S. was hired as research staff under the SUBV23/00031 project. C.G-O and V.S-L were hired as research staff under SUVB24/00031 Project.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the researchers and scholars dedicated to understanding and mitigating the effects of internet dependence and excessive digital use. Their valuable investigations have provided essential insights into this growing public health concern and have been instrumental in shaping the foundation of the present study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DSM-5Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
FoMoFear of Missing Out

References

  1. Twenge, J.M.; Martin, G.N.; Spitzberg, B.H. Trends in U.S. Adolescents’ Media Use, 1976–2016: The Rise of Digital Media, the Decline of TV, and the (Near) Demise of Print. Psychol. Pop. Media Cult. 2019, 8, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lopes, L.S.; Valentini, J.P.; Monteiro, T.H.; De Freitas Costacurta, M.C.; Soares, L.O.N.; Telfar-Barnard, L.; Nunes, P.V. Problematic Social Media Use and Its Relationship with Depression or Anxiety: A Systematic Review. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2022, 25, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pruszyński, J.; Cianciara, D.; Włodarczyk-Pruszyńska, I.; Górczak, M.; Padzińska-Pruszyńska, I. Indoor Generation Era. Risks and Challenges. J. Educ. Health Sport 2023, 48, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Busch, P.A.; McCarthy, S. Antecedents and Consequences of Problematic Smartphone Use: A Systematic Literature Review of an Emerging Research Area. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 114, 106414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yildirim Demirdöğen, E.; Akinci, M.A.; Bozkurt, A.; Bayraktutan, B.; Turan, B.; Aydoğdu, S.; Ucuz, İ.; Abanoz, E.; Yitik Tonkaz, G.; Çakir, A.; et al. Social Media Addiction, Escapism and Coping Strategies Are Associated with the Problematic Internet Use of Adolescents in Türkiye: A Multi-Center Study. Front. Psychiatry 2024, 15, 1355759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stangl, F.J. Exploring Themes in Digital Detox Research: Insights from a Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Würzburg, Germany, 16 September 2024. [Google Scholar]
  7. Panova, T.; Carbonell, X. Is Smartphone Addiction Really an Addiction? J. Behav. Addict. 2018, 7, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hogan, J.N.; Heyman, R.E.; Smith Slep, A.M. A Meta-Review of Screening and Treatment of Electronic “Addictions”. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2024, 113, 102468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bottel, L.; Brand, M.; Dieris-Hirche, J.; Pape, M.; Herpertz, S.; te Wildt, B.T. Predictive Power of the DSM-5 Criteria for Internet Use Disorder: A CHAID Decision-Tree Analysis. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1129769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chun, J.W.; Choi, J.; Cho, H.; Choi, M.R.; Ahn, K.J.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, D.J. Role of Frontostriatal Connectivity in Adolescents With Excessive Smartphone Use. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. King, D.L.; Herd, M.C.E.; Delfabbro, P.H. Motivational Components of Tolerance in Internet Gaming Disorder. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 78, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sohn, S.; Rees, P.; Wildridge, B.; Kalk, N.J.; Carter, B. Prevalence of Problematic Smartphone Usage and Associated Mental Health Outcomes amongst Children and Young People: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and GRADE of the Evidence. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guertler, D.; Bläsing, D.; Moehring, A.; Meyer, C.; Brandt, D.; Schmidt, H.; Rehbein, F.; Neumann, M.; Dreißigacker, A.; Bischof, A.; et al. App-Based Addiction Prevention at German Vocational Schools: Implementation and Reach for a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Prev. Sci. 2024, 25, 849–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kuss, D.J.; Griffiths, M.D. Social Networking Sites and Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Meng, S.Q.; Cheng, J.L.; Li, Y.Y.; Yang, X.Q.; Zheng, J.W.; Chang, X.W.; Shi, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, L.; Sun, Y.; et al. Global Prevalence of Digital Addiction in General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2022, 92, 102128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Naga, J.F.; Ebardo, R.A. Social Network Sites (SNS) an Archetype of Techno-Social Stress: A Systematic Review. Heliyon 2024, 11, e41119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. King, A.L.S.; Valença, A.M.; Silva, A.C.; Sancassiani, F.; Machado, S.; Nardi, A.E. “Nomophobia”: Impact of Cell Phone Use Interfering with Symptoms and Emotions of Individuals with Panic Disorder Compared with a Control Group. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2014, 10, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aslani, M.; Sadeghi, N.; Janatolmakan, M.; Rezaeian, S.; Khatony, A. Nomophobia among Nursing Students: Prevalence and Associated Factors. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rodríguez-García, A.M.; Belmonte, J.L.; Moreno-Guerrero, A.J. Nomophobia: An Individual’s Growing Fear of Being without a Smartphone—A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tuco, K.G.; Castro-Diaz, S.D.; Soriano-Moreno, D.R.; Benites-Zapata, V.A. Prevalence of Nomophobia in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthc. Inform. Res. 2023, 29, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Janatolmakan, M.; Karampour, A.; Rezaeian, S.; Khatony, A. Nomophobia: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Impact on Academic Performance among Nursing Students. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rodríguez-García, A.M.; Marín-Marín, J.A.; López-Núñez, J.A.; Moreno-Guerrero, A.J. Do Age and Educational Stage Influence No-Mobile-Phone Phobia? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Meng, Y.; Shi, X.; Cai, D.; Ran, M.; Ye, A.; Qiu, C. Prevalence, Predictive Factors, and Impacts of Internet Gaming Disorder among Adolescents: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study. J. Affect. Disord. 2024, 362, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Correa-Iriarte, S.; Hidalgo-Fuentes, S.; Martí-Vilar, M. Relationship between Problematic Smartphone Use, Sleep Quality and Bedtime Procrastination: A Mediation Analysis. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sanz-Martín, D.; Ubago-Jiménez, J.L.; Cachón-Zagalaz, J.; Zurita-Ortega, F. Impact of Physical Activity and Bio-Psycho-Social Factors on Social Network Addiction and Gender Differences in Spanish Undergraduate Education Students. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiang, K.; Kong, F. Passive Social Networking Sites Use and Disordered Eating Behaviors in Adolescents: The Roles of Upward Social Comparison and Body Dissatisfaction and Its Sex Differences. Appetite 2024, 198, 107360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, Y.; Dykxhoorn, J.; Plackett, R. The Impact of Different Types of Social Media Use on the Mental Health of UK Adults: Longitudinal Observational Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2024, 26, e56950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nassen, L.M.; Vandebosch, H.; Poels, K.; Karsay, K. Opt-out, Abstain, Unplug. A Systematic Review of the Voluntary Digital Disconnection Literature. Telemat. Inform. 2023, 81, 101980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Radtke, T.; Apel, T.; Schenkel, K.; Keller, J.; von Lindern, E. Digital Detox: An Effective Solution in the Smartphone Era? A Systematic Literature Review. Mob. Media Commun. 2022, 10, 190–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grgic, J.; Dumuid, D.; Bengoechea, E.G.; Shrestha, N.; Bauman, A.; Olds, T.; Pedisic, Z. Health Outcomes Associated with Reallocations of Time between Sleep, Sedentary Behaviour, and Physical Activity: A Systematic Scoping Review of Isotemporal Substitution Studies. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2018, 15, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Buecker, S.; Simacek, T.; Ingwersen, B.; Terwiel, S.; Simonsmeier, B.A. Physical Activity and Subjective Well-Being in Healthy Individuals: A Meta-Analytic Review. Health Psychol. Rev. 2021, 15, 574–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Posadzki, P.; Pieper, D.; Bajpai, R.; Makaruk, H.; Könsgen, N.; Neuhaus, A.L.; Semwal, M. Exercise/Physical Activity and Health Outcomes: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Carty, C.; Chaput, J.P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beauchamp, M.R.; Ruissen, G.R.; Dunlop, W.L.; Estabrooks, P.A.; Harden, S.M.; Wolf, S.A.; Liu, Y.; Schmader, T.; Puterman, E.; Sheel, A.W.; et al. Group-Based Physical Activity for Older Adults (GOAL) Randomized Controlled Trial: Exercise Adherence Outcomes. Health Psychol. 2018, 37, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. De Nys, L.; Anderson, K.; Ofosu, E.F.; Ryde, G.C.; Connelly, J.; Whittaker, A.C. The Effects of Physical Activity on Cortisol and Sleep: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2022, 143, 105843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Marques, A.; Marconcin, P.; Werneck, A.O.; Ferrari, G.; Gouveia, É.R.; Kliegel, M.; Peralta, M.; Ihle, A. Bidirectional Association between Physical Activity and Dopamine Across Adulthood-A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. de Oliveira, L.R.S.; Machado, F.S.M.; Rocha-Dias, I.; e Magalhães, C.O.D.; De Sousa, R.A.L.; Cassilhas, R.C. An Overview of the Molecular and Physiological Antidepressant Mechanisms of Physical Exercise in Animal Models of Depression. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 4965–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Powell, K.E.; Paluch, A.E.; Blair, S.N. Physical Activity for Health: What Kind? How Much? How Intense? On Top of What? Annu. Rev. Public Health 2011, 32, 349–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Stonerock, G.L.; Blumenthal, J.A. Role of Counseling to Promote Adherence in Healthy Lifestyle Medicine: Strategies to Improve Exercise Adherence and Enhance Physical Activity. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 59, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Collado-Mateo, D.; Lavín-Pérez, A.M.; Peñacoba, C.; Del Coso, J.; Leyton-Román, M.; Luque-Casado, A.; Gasque, P.; Fernández-Del-olmo, M.Á.; Amado-Alonso, D. Key Factors Associated with Adherence to Physical Exercise in Patients with Chronic Diseases and Older Adults: An Umbrella Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jeong, A.; Ryu, S.; Kim, S.; Park, H.K.; Hwang, H.S.; Park, K.Y. Association between Problematic Smartphone Use and Physical Activity among Adolescents: A Path Analysis Based on the 2020 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey. Korean J. Fam. Med. 2023, 44, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, L.; Hou, J.; Zhou, B.; Xiao, X.; Wang, J.; Jia, W. Physical Activity, Problematic Smartphone Use, and Burnout among Chinese College Students. PeerJ 2023, 11, e16270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pirwani, N.; Szabo, A. Could Physical Activity Alleviate Smartphone Addiction in University Students? A Systematic Literature Review. Prev. Med. Rep. 2024, 42, 102744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Theopilus, Y.; Al Mahmud, A.; Davis, H.; Octavia, J.R. Preventive Interventions for Internet Addiction in Young Children: Systematic Review. JMIR Ment. Health 2024, 11, e56896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sirtoli, R.; Fernández-Rodríguez, R.; Balboa-Castillo, T.; Rodrigues, R.; Garrido-Miguel, M.; Eumann Mesas, A.; Morales, G.; Molino Guidoni, C. Time Spent on Social Media and Depressive Symptoms in University Students: The Mediating Role of Psychoactive Substances. Am. J. Addict. 2024, 33, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Morningstar, B.; Clayborne, Z.; Wong, S.L.; Roberts, K.C.; Prince, S.A.; Gariépy, G.; Goldfield, G.S.; Janssen, I.; Lang, J.J. The Association between Social Media Use and Physical Activity among Canadian Adolescents: A Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study. Can. J. Public Health 2023, 114, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sayili, U.; Pirdal, B.Z.; Kara, B.; Acar, N.; Camcioglu, E.; Yilmaz, E.; Can, G.; Erginoz, E. Internet Addiction and Social Media Addiction in Medical Faculty Students: Prevalence, Related Factors, and Association with Life Satisfaction. J. Community Health 2023, 48, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Huang, P.C.; Chen, J.S.; Potenza, M.N.; Griffiths, M.D.; Pakpour, A.H.; Chen, J.K.; Lin, Y.C.; Hung, C.H.; O’Brien, K.S.; Lin, C.Y. Temporal Associations between Physical Activity and Three Types of Problematic Use of the Internet: A Six-Month Longitudinal Study. J. Behav. Addict. 2022, 11, 1055–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gavriel-Fried, B.; Bronstein, I.; Sherpsky, I. The Link between Competitive Sports and Gambling Behaviors among Youths. Am. J. Addict. 2015, 24, 200–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Angelo, D.L.; Tavares, H.; Zilberman, M.L. Evaluation of a Physical Activity Program for Pathological Gamblers in Treatment. J. Gambl. Stud. 2013, 29, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.; Feng, S.; Li, H. The Associations between Daytime Physical Activity, While-in-Bed Smartphone Use, Sleep Delay, and Sleep Quality: A 24-h Investigation among Chinese College Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Saffari, M.; Chen, J.S.; Wu, H.C.; Fung, X.C.C.; Chang, C.C.; Chang, Y.L.; Kamolthip, R.; Potenza, M.N.; Lin, I.C.; Lin, C.Y. Effects of Weight-Related Self-Stigma and Smartphone Addiction on Female University Students’ Physical Activity Levels. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, S.; Xiao, T.; Yang, L.; Loprinzi, P.D. Exercise as an Alternative Approach for Treating Smartphone Addiction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Random Controlled Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Precht, L.M.; Mertens, F.; Brickau, D.S.; Kramm, R.J.; Margraf, J.; Stirnberg, J.; Brailovskaia, J. Engaging in Physical Activity Instead of (over)Using the Smartphone: An Experimental Investigation of Lifestyle Interventions to Prevent Problematic Smartphone Use and to Promote Mental Health. J. Public Health 2024, 32, 589–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xiao, T.; Jiao, C.; Yao, J.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Grabovac, I.; Yu, Q.; Kong, Z.; Yu, J.J.; et al. Effects of Basketball and Baduanjin Exercise Interventions on Problematic Smartphone Use and Mental Health among College Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2021, 2021, 8880716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, K.; Lu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ren, J.; Guo, H.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, H.; Yuan, G.; Jin, G.; et al. Effects of Psychological or Exercise Interventions on Problematic Mobile Phone Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr. Addict. Rep. 2023, 10, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yan, Y.; Qin, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, W.; Li, B. Effects of Exercise Interventions on Internet Addiction among College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Addict. Behav. 2025, 160, 108159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Noseworthy, M.; Peddie, L.; Buckler, E.J.; Park, F.; Pham, M.; Pratt, S.; Singh, A.; Puterman, E.; Liu-Ambrose, T. The Effects of Outdoor versus Indoor Exercise on Psychological Health, Physical Health, and Physical Activity Behaviour: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pasanen, T.P.; Neuvonen, M.; Korpela, K.M. The Psychology of Recent Nature Visits: (How) Are Motives and Attentional Focus Related to Post-Visit Restorative Experiences, Creativity, and Emotional Well-Being? Environ. Behav. 2017, 50, 913–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Coventry, P.A.; Brown, J.V.E.; Pervin, J.; Brabyn, S.; Pateman, R.; Breedvelt, J.; Gilbody, S.; Stancliffe, R.; McEachan, R.; White, P.C.L. Nature-Based Outdoor Activities for Mental and Physical Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. SSM Popul. Health 2021, 16, 100934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ismail, N.; Tajjudin, A.I.; Jaafar, H.; Nik Jaafar, N.R.; Baharudin, A.; Ibrahim, N. The Relationship between Internet Addiction, Internet Gaming and Anxiety among Medical Students in a Malaysian Public University during COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Almugti, H.S.; Alotaibi, A.; Almohammed, A.; Abuhadi, R.; Baeshen, R.; Alharthi, Z.; Alsharari, A.; Alotaibi, S.; Omar, Y.; Alturki, N.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on Saudi Children: Special Focus on Behavioral, Social, and Emotional Aspects, 2020–2021. Cureus 2021, 13, e19856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gladwell, V.F.; Brown, D.K.; Wood, C.; Sandercock, G.R.; Barton, J.L. The Great Outdoors: How a Green Exercise Environment Can Benefit All. Extrem. Physiol. Med. 2013, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sarker, M.S.; Imtiaz, A.; Haque, S.; Mahmud, K.T. The Link between Facebook Addiction and Depression among University Students: Evidence from a Lower-Middle Income Country. Health Sci. Rep. 2023, 6, e1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lin, C.-H.; Lin, S.-L.; Wu, C.-P. The Effects of Parental Monitoring and Leisure Boredom on Adolescents’ Internet Addiction. Adolescence 2009, 44, 993–1004. [Google Scholar]
  66. Guedes Vidal, D.; Tiago Da Silva Lopes, H.; Laezza, L.; De Dominicis, S.; Brondino, M. Reassessing Green Exercise Research: Unveiling Methodological Gaps and Pathways for Progress. Front. Sports Act. Living 2024, 6, 1449059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Park, S. Associations of Physical Activity with Sleep Satisfaction, Perceived Stress, and Problematic Internet Use in Korean Adolescents. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Walsh Id, L.C.; Regan, A.; Okabe-Miyamoto, K.; Lyubomirsky, S. Does Putting down Your Smartphone Make You Happier? The Effects of Restricting Digital Media on Well-Being. PLOS ONE 2024, 19, e0306910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ansari, S.; Iqbal, N.; Azeem, A.; Danyal, K. Improving Well-Being Through Digital Detoxification Among Social Media Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2024, 27, 753–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ramadhan, R.N.; Rampengan, D.D.; Yumnanisha, D.A.; Setiono, S.B.V.; Tjandra, K.C.; Ariyanto, M.V.; Idrisov, B.; Empitu, M.A. Impacts of Digital Social Media Detox for Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Narra J. 2024, 4, e786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pedrouzo, S.B.; Krynski, L. Hyperconnected: Children and Adolescents on Social Media. The TikTok Phenomenon. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 2023, 121, e202202674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Desai, D.; Patel, J.; Saiyed, F.; Upadhyay, H.; Kariya, P.; Patel, J. A Literature Review on Holistic Well-Being and Dopamine Fasting: An Integrated Approach. Cureus 2024, 16, e61643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Alanzi, T.M.; Arif, W.; Aqeeli, R.; Alnafisi, A.; Qumosani, T.; Alreshidi, A.; Alhawsawi, S.; Alnakli, R.; Alotaibi, A.; AlOthman, M.; et al. Examining the Impact of Digital Detox Interventions on Anxiety and Depression Levels Among Young Adults. Cureus 2024, 16, e75625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Upendra, S.; Kaur, J. Break From Digital Screen Using Digital Detox Program in Nursing Students. Nurs. Health Sci. 2024, 26, e13157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Megret, C. No Connectivity, Better Connections: Teenagers’ Experiences of a Phone-Free Summer Camp in the United States. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn. 2024, 24, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, J. Promoting a Healthy Lifestyle: Exploring the Role of Social Media and Fitness Applications in the Context of Social Media Addiction Risk. Health Educ. Res. 2024, 39, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Samsudin, N.; Bailey, R.P.; Ries, F.; Hashim, S.N.A.B.; Fernandez, J.A. Assessing the Impact of Physical Activity on Reducing Depressive Symptoms: A Rapid Review. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 2024, 16, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhihao, D.; Tao, W.; Yingjie, S.; Feng, Z. The Influence of Physical Activity on Internet Addiction among Chinese College Students: The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem and the Moderating Role of Gender. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ding, Y.; Wan, X.; Lu, G.; Huang, H.; Liang, Y.; Yu, J.; Chen, C. The Associations between Smartphone Addiction and Self-Esteem, Self-Control, and Social Support among Chinese Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1029323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ko, C.H.; Yen, J.Y.; Lin, P.C. Association between Urbanization and Internet Addiction. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2022, 35, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Egorov, A.Y.; Grechanyi, S.V. Current Approaches to the Treatment and Correction of Internet Addiction. Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. Im. S S Korsakova 2019, 119, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. McDaniel, B.T.; Pater, J.; Cornet, V.; Mughal, S.; Reining, L.; Schaller, A.; Radesky, J.; Drouin, M. Parents’ Desire to Change Phone Use: Associations with Objective Smartphone Use and Feelings about Problematic Use and Distraction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2023, 148, 107907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart with the three-step aim of this perspective article on recommendations for physical exercise as a strategy to reduce problematic use of the Internet and digital devices.
Figure 1. Flowchart with the three-step aim of this perspective article on recommendations for physical exercise as a strategy to reduce problematic use of the Internet and digital devices.
Ijerph 22 00753 g001
Table 1. Author-informed recommendations for exercise programs included during digital detox.
Table 1. Author-informed recommendations for exercise programs included during digital detox.
Recommendations for Digital Detox ProgramsPhysical Activity and Exercise Considerations to Be Included in Digital Detox Programs
Type of challengesDetox challenges must be voluntary and self-selected according to the characteristics and motivations of participantsThe selection of exercise type should consider participants’ characteristics and motivations, as various forms of exercise can be effective
Level of demand for the challengeReducing time is more recommended than total abstinence. Abrupt dopamine fasting (associated with total abstinence) may lead to negative consequences, so challenges must have different levels according to the baseline characteristics of the participantsIndividualization is key and exercise intensity and volume must be adapted to the participant’s characteristics and physical fitness levels
Spatial and temporal restrictionsChanging settings like airplane mode or muting the notifications is useful. Restrictions may be related to a specific space (for instance, avoid using the smartphone in the bedroom) or time (for instance, avoid using the smartphone 1h before going to sleep)Avoid using smartphones, wearables, and digital devices during exercise is recommended to pay full attention to the activity
Length of interventionEffective length of intervention may range from a few days to several weeksExercise interventions may be more effective when the duration is ≥12 weeks, with at least 3 sessions per week
Promotion of healthy habitsIt is important to integrate digital disconnection as a healthy habit in the daily living of the participantExercise interventions should aim to promote exercise adherence as part of an overall change towards a healthier lifestyle
Link between physical exercise and problematic use of the Internet and digital devicesPhysical exercise should be considered as a core part of every digital detox programExercise interventions should target improvements in mental health and overall well-being to significantly contribute to digital detox programs
Social interactionsDigital detox programs must promote social interactions to avoid loneliness, as well as promote real interactionsTeam sports and collaborative and competitive physical exercise activities are recommended.
Participants’ own awareness and goalsBy using apps on Android or iPhone, participants can check their daily use of smartphones and establish adjusted individual goals (for instance, restricting the use of social media apps to 30 daily minutes)Feedback and information must be provided to make the participant aware of the changes and improvements
Mindful activitiesActivities aimed at increasing mindfulness are recommendedMindful activities are recommended. The use of digital devices during exercise is not recommended to maintain full attention in the activity
Outdoor activitiesSpending time outdoors might lead to further benefits compared to being indoorOutdoor physical activities have shown larger benefits than indoor activities. Activities in natural environments, such as green and blue exercises, are recommended because of mental health and quality of life
Inter-disciplinary approachThe complexity of the topic may require cooperation of different professionals, including clinicians, psychologists, exercise professionals, etc.Exercise professionals should design and conduct the exercise program. However, a multidisciplinary team is needed to assess improvements at all levels
Measuring toolsUtilization of validated scales and questionnaires is recommended. Those data may be complemented by data extracted directly from the user’s smartphoneImprovements must be assessed using validated tests and scales. A well-designed evaluation framework should be incorporated to measure the intervention’s effectiveness and to remodel future protocols
Long-term assessmentStudies must evaluate not only short-term but also long-term effects in order to check the retainmentThe assessment of both chronic and acute effects of exercise is essential, but consistent follow-up is crucial to ensuring meaningful long-term changes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Ortiz, C.; Lorenzo-González, M.; Fernández-Sánchez, J.; Solano-Lizcano, V.; Del Coso, J.; Collado-Mateo, D. Recommendations for Physical Exercise as a Strategy to Reduce Problematic Use of the Internet and Digital Devices: A Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050753

AMA Style

García-Ortiz C, Lorenzo-González M, Fernández-Sánchez J, Solano-Lizcano V, Del Coso J, Collado-Mateo D. Recommendations for Physical Exercise as a Strategy to Reduce Problematic Use of the Internet and Digital Devices: A Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(5):753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050753

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Ortiz, Christel, Miriam Lorenzo-González, Javier Fernández-Sánchez, Víctor Solano-Lizcano, Juan Del Coso, and Daniel Collado-Mateo. 2025. "Recommendations for Physical Exercise as a Strategy to Reduce Problematic Use of the Internet and Digital Devices: A Perspective" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 22, no. 5: 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050753

APA Style

García-Ortiz, C., Lorenzo-González, M., Fernández-Sánchez, J., Solano-Lizcano, V., Del Coso, J., & Collado-Mateo, D. (2025). Recommendations for Physical Exercise as a Strategy to Reduce Problematic Use of the Internet and Digital Devices: A Perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(5), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050753

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop