Next Article in Journal
Socioeconomic Deprivation and Opioid Consumption: An Analysis Across England
Previous Article in Journal
Screening with the Bilateral Corneal Symmetry 3-D Analyzer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors for Fall-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review Highlighting Research Gaps
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Fall Incidence Based on Statistical Analysis

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(5), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050748
by Da Hye Moon 1,2, Tae-Hoon Kim 2, Myoung-Nam Lim 3 and Seon-Sook Han 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22(5), 748; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050748
Submission received: 4 April 2025 / Revised: 5 May 2025 / Accepted: 8 May 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Article

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Fall Incidence Based on Statistical Analysis

 

 

The topic of the manuscript is interesting.  The statistical methods are chosen correctly.

I recommend a structured Abstract according to the model: Introduction. Aim/Objective. Methods. Results. Conclusions. I would add two key words.

The article lacks a detailed description of the research sample and demographic data. This is a cross-sectional study, authors undefined variables.

I propose dividing table No. 2 and table No. 3 from a formal point of view.

The ethical aspect was respected. I miss the detailed study design, description of contributing factors of falls in specific patients, etc.

The limitations of the study are described at the end of the discussion. The study was designed as a cross-sectional study focusing on patients who experienced falls over a 6-year period.

The conclusion evaluates the results of the study, I would add numerical results.

The last sentence is of a general nature: Falls are preventable medical incidents, and further research is needed to explore the characteristics, risk factors, and fall assessments. Suggest specific ways

 

The article uses old literary sources, for example: 2007, 2008, 1995.

 

Accept after recommended revisions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article requires further refinement and clarification. Please see my comments below…

 

INTRODUCTION

The introduction section is underdeveloped. While it mentions the need for further diverse research, this point is not clearly explained or supported. Additionally, the aim of the study and its relevance are not clear.

 

METHODS

Methods sections is also quite poor…

Please define inclusion and exclusion criteria and their justification…

It is not clear whether the falls occurred before or while at the hospital...

Why were the patients categorized into internal medicine and surgical department groups?

How and by whom were the data collected for the study?

Please describe the Morse Fall Scale and the pertinence for its use…

 

RESULTS

In tables, some parameters need units…

 

DISCUSSION

I do not understand what is discussed in the first paragraph…

There is a lack of discussion on the implications for practice based on the data obtained.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

None.

Back to TopTop