Next Article in Journal
Development of an eHealth Intervention Prototype to Prevent Health Risk Behaviors Among Hispanic Adolescents: A User-Centered Formative Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mental and Physical Wellbeing of Carer–Employees in Canada
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sargassum Inundations and the Risk of Hypertension Disorders Among Pregnant Women Living in the French Caribbean Island of Martinique

1
Cardiovascular Research Team (UR5_3 PC2E), University of the French West Indies (Université des Antilles), 97200 Fort-de-France, France
2
Department of Toxicology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Martinique (CHU Martinique), 97261 Fort-de-France, France
3
Department of Clinical Physiology, University Hospital of Martinique (CHU Martinique), CS 90632, 97261 Fort-de-France, France
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Martinique (CHU Martinique), 97261 Fort-de-France, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21(12), 1612; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121612
Submission received: 1 October 2024 / Revised: 30 October 2024 / Accepted: 28 November 2024 / Published: 1 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)

Abstract

:
Since 2011, Caribbean territories have experienced massive and repeated sargassum seaweed inundations. Once on shore, sargassum degradation through anaerobic metabolism elicits the release of many noxious molecules, including hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and ammonia (NH3). H2S has been long recognized as a malodorous and highly toxic gas, while chronic exposure has not been extensively explored. Our objective was to assess whether pregnant women exposed to sargassum emissions would be more prone to developing hypertensive disorders compared to unexposed women. We conducted a retrospective study including 3020 pregnant women at the Obstetrics Department of the University Hospital of Martinique between 25 January 2016 and 31 July 2020. Exposure was defined as a distance of less than 2 km between the residence/workplace of the women and the sargassum strandings. Multivariate regression retained age, body mass index, sickle cell disease, primipaternity, gestational diabetes and sargassum emissions exposure as independent predictors of hypertensive events in pregnant women. Jointly with previous studies from our group, this study highlights the deleterious effects of sargassum emissions on human health in individuals chronically exposed to low to moderate H2S concentrations.

1. Introduction

In the last decade, massive sargassum seaweed beaching on the coasts of the Caribbean, Central America, and Brazil has become a real threat, causing major socio-economic, ecological, and health problems [1]. Several hypotheses are possible as to why sargassum has been increasingly washing to shore, including changes in hydrodynamic and wind conditions, increased nutrients from the Amazon due to deforestation and intensification of agriculture in these territories, and global warming of the tropical Atlantic [1,2].
The potential impacts on human health from sargassum influx events include emissions of potentially harmful gases, leaching of heavy metals, and exposure to potentially harmful bacteria and stinging organisms that co-occur with sargassum [1,3,4,5]. Toxic gas exposure typically happens during decomposition, approximately 48 h after sargassum mats wash ashore. During this process, sargassum releases hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas and ammonia (NH3), which can cause serious health problems, including neurological, digestive, respiratory, and ophthalmologic symptoms in populations exposed throughout weeks [1,4]. While the health effects of long-term and repeated exposure to this gaseous cocktail are largely unknown, previous studies in geothermal areas have observed that H2S exposure might increase morbidity for neurological, respiratory, and cardiovascular diseases [6,7,8]. Geothermal sources have the advantage over other ambient H2S-producing entities of not being known to produce other gases with the potential to confound results. Indeed, geothermal gases are mainly carbon dioxide and water vapor, with only small amounts of hydrogen, nitrogen, methane and carbon monoxide [8]. Most of the available knowledge about the health effects of chronic exposure to H2S comes from research conducted in Rotorua, New Zealand, which is home to the world’s largest community living over an active geothermal field [8]. In these studies, other possible air pollutants are vehicle emissions, which are limited to the main business street of Rotorua and can be easily identified as a confounding factor, hence allowing to study the health effects of chronic exposure to H2S. Of note, sargassum emissions are mainly related to H2S production at ranging doses similar to those reported in the Rotorua geothermal field [1,4].
Associations between the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational air pollution exposure have been previously reported [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Epidemiological studies and meta-analyses [11,14] provide strong evidence that various gaseous and particulate pollutants are associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. The impacts of nitrogen oxides (NO2, NOX) and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5) on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were consistently observed [9,10,12,13,15], whereas the implication of ozone (O3) exposure remains inconsistent [16]. H2S is present in the atmosphere as the result of industrial activities and volcanoes and geothermal vents, as well as being released from wetlands, salt marshes, and estuaries, where it is produced by bacteria during the anaerobic decay of organic sulfur compounds [8,17]. Surprisingly, atmospheric H2S has not been previously associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Evidence of both the protective role and deleterious effects of H2S in cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, has been demonstrated [18,19,20,21]. Many reports have described the beneficial effects of H2S on cardiovascular cellular processes, including the modulation of inflammation, improved cell survival, cytoprotection against oxidative stress, as well as positive effects on mitochondrial metabolic function and biogenesis [18,19,20,21]. As a different concept, cardiovascular H2S toxicity has been attributed to the inhibition of cellular enzymes [18,19,20,21,22] and vasoconstriction [23,24,25,26,27,28]. The involvement of H2S in the pathophysiology of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and pre-eclampsia is not clear. It has been reported that mRNA and protein expression of the enzyme cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE) are decreased in the placental tissue of pre-eclamptic women [29]. However, H2S plasma levels were found either decreased or increased in women with pre-eclampsia compared to healthy pregnant women [30,31].
To date, only a few studies, mainly from our research group, have objectively reported the clinical symptomatology associated with chronic exposure to sargassum gaseous emissions [4,32,33]. In the specific context of human H2S exposure to sargassum emissions, we have previously reported that the onset of pre-eclampsia occurred earlier in women living and/or working close coastal sargassum strandings [34]. Whether day-to-day variations in H2S levels are associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders onset during pregnancy has not been previously investigated. The present study aims to analyze the potential relation between environmental exposure to H2S gas emitted by decomposing sargassum and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

The present study was conducted in accordance with the amended Declaration of Helsinki (https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/; accessed on 20 September 2024) and Good Clinical Practice guidelines (GCP European Directive 2005/28/EC; accessed on 20 September 2024). Written informed consent was systematically obtained from all patients. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital of Martinique (IRB 2023/033).

2.2. Study Setting

The French Caribbean Island of Martinique (14.6415° N, 61.0242° W, surface area of 1128 km2) is one of the most populated territories in the Caribbean basin (population size of 365,734 in 2023). The east coast of the island is bordered by the Atlantic Ocean, while its west coast faces the Caribbean Sea. Oceanic current and maritime trade winds off the Atlantic coast expose Martinique’s eastern coast to coastal sargassum stranding episodes, i.e., the onshore accumulation and compaction of large amounts of the seaweed. In contrast, the island’s Caribbean shoreline is protected by a mountainous relief, which shields the coastline from sargassum strandings. The sargassum invasion of the Atlantic coastline of Martinique was first noted in 2011, with massive invasions recurring annually or biannually since 2018.

2.3. Study Population

This single-center prospective observational study was conducted at the University Hospital of Martinique from 25 January 2016 to 31 July 2020. Pregnant women, residing in Martinique, were recruited and followed during the study period at the University Hospital’s obstetric center. The study population was restricted to women with pregnancy (determined by ultrasound scan). Other inclusion criteria were a minimal age of 18 years and a gestational age of 20 weeks or more. Exclusion criteria were as follows: inability or refusal to provide informed consent for study participation, pregnancy with more than two babies at a time, and women geographically relocating during the pregnancy period. The latter criterion makes it difficult to determine living/working distance from coastal sargassum stranding sites.

2.4. Study Data

Study data were retrospectively extracted from the administrative and medical databases of the University Hospital of Martinique using the Emergency DX Care software (DXCare 8.2021, Medasys, Dedalus, France). In addition to each subject’s home and work addresses, the data collected retrospectively for study purposes included the patients’ sociodemographic features (age, sex, body mass index, personal and medical history, as well as pregnancy complications and delivery characteristics).

2.5. Definition of Sargassum Exposure (H2S)

The patient’s status of exposure to sargassum gaseous emissions was determined based on the residential and work addresses provided. Island residents were considered to be exposed to ambient H2S emissions from decomposing sargassum if they lived and/or worked in areas along the Atlantic coast of Martinique, which are known to be impacted by sargassum influxes (Figure S1).
The levels of exposure were determined on the basis of the measured levels of ambient H2S and NH3 levels in ambient air, which are gauged using a network of 16 ground sensors. These sensors have been deployed along the Atlantic coast of Martinique since 2016 by Martinique’s air quality observatory (Madininair) and certified by the French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, and Sustainable Development (https://www.madininair.fr/, accessed on 20 September 2024). Ground sensors are located in sensitive areas such as schools, colleges, health establishments, or densely populated areas close to sites of sargassum strandings. Accordingly, pregnant women identified as exposed to increased ambient H2S and NH3 levels were living and/or working in areas within a distance of <2 km from the nearest ground sensor. For those pregnant women, mean individual H2S exposures were approximated by noting the daily concentrations (in ppm) of H2S provided by the nearest ground sensor to a patient’s living or working quarters and averaged over the whole pregnancy duration. In contrast, patients living and/or working in the island’s center or along the Caribbean shoreline, in areas located up to 2 km from sargassum stranding sites, were considered to be unexposed to H2S originating from decomposing sargassum. This assumption was made on the basis of the virtually nil levels of these gases registered by the mobile sensors deployed in these regions. As such, in light of the lack of sargassum exposure and any other natural, chemical, or industrial source of H2S emissions in these areas, populations not residing/working on the Atlantic coast of Martinique were thus considered unexposed.

2.6. Definition of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

The outcome was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, which were diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria of the UK College of Obstetrics and Gynecology [35]. In brief, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy include gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia (including chronic (pre-existing) hypertension with superimposed pre-eclampsia), and eclampsia. In this study, a history of chronic (pre-existing) hypertension was not considered as related to pregnancy.

2.7. Air Pollution

Air pollution data, collected by Martinique’s air quality observatory, were also analyzed in order to take into account the potential confounding effect of air pollution on pregnancy outcome. Levels of ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter of ≤10 μm in diameter (PM10), and fine particulate matter of ≤2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5) were considered over the study period. Crude daily data, originating from the different measure stations in Martinique, were obtained for each pollutant (readings provided by Madininair), and monthly aggregated mean concentrations of each pollutant were computed for the whole island. Computed means were then compared to limit values for the protection of human health, set by the French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, and Sustainable Development. Beyond these threshold values for each pollutant, a health risk was considered plausible.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

For all descriptive and inferential analyses, the assumption of normal data distribution was analyzed. Mean and 95% confidence intervals were reported for normally distributed variables and median and min-max range for non-normally distributed variables. Categorical variables were presented as absolute values and percentages. The following tests were used for group comparisons: Student’s t-test, chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to assess the independent effect of predictors on pregnancy-related hypertension disorders. Variables with significant association in univariate analysis (p < 0.25) were retained for backward stepwise multivariate regression analysis. Associations were quantified using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. All statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS software 26.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

The study population was restricted to pregnant women attending the University Hospital of Martinique during the study period (2016–2020). Overall, 3020 eligible pregnant women with a complete dataset and available home/work addresses were included for analysis. The flow chart of inclusion is displayed in Figure 1.
The main clinical and biological characteristics of pregnant women according to pregnancy-induced hypertension disorders are presented in Table 1. Compared to pregnant women without hypertension disorders, those with hypertension disorders (11.7%) were older and displayed a higher body weight index. Primiparity and primipaternity were more frequent in pregnant women with hypertension disorders compared to normotensive pregnant women. No significant differences were found for active tobacco use. Medical history of chronic hypertension, type 2 diabetes, sickle cell disease, and personal pre-eclampsia items were more frequently reported in pregnant women with hypertension disorders. Term pregnancy was shorter in pregnant women with hypertension disorders and those women were more prone to complications such as gestational diabetes, threat of premature labor, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome (Table 1). Compared to pregnant women without hypertension disorders, those with hypertension disorders displayed increased blood markers of liver dysfunction, inflammation, and leukocytosis. Newborn weight and Apgar score were also lower in pregnant women with hypertension disorders. Environmental exposure to active sargassum strandings tends to be more frequent in pregnant women with hypertension disorders but failed to reach statistical significance (p-value = 0.073). The mean concentration of H2S over the whole pregnancy was found to be higher in women with hypertension disorders compared to normotensive pregnant women (Table 1).
The main characteristics of pregnant women (study population n = 3020) according to sargassum stranding exposure evaluated by the distance between their living/working places and coastline sargassum strandings are presented Table 2. Compared to unexposed pregnant women (n = 2367), those exposed to sargassum strandings (n = 653) were older, while hypertensive disorders and HELLP syndrome were more frequent (Table 2).
On average, the mean H2S concentration over the whole period of pregnancy was 0.036 ± 0.236 ppm in exposed subjects. Pregnant women living/working on the Atlantic coast were exposed for 26 days to mean (daily) H2S levels of at least 1 ppm. In some areas, patients experienced a maximal number of 12 days of mean (daily) H2S concentrations of 5 pm or more. On average, the mean NH3 concentration over the whole period of pregnancy was 0.052 ± 0.184 ppm in exposed subjects. None of the pregnant women living/working on the Atlantic coast were exposed to NH3 levels up to 8.3 ppm. Of note, H2S and NH3 recommendations and thresholds from the French High Council for Public Health (Haut Conseil Santé Public (https://www.madininair.fr/, accessed on 20 September 2024) are 1 ppm and 8.3 ppm, respectively.
The main characteristics of pregnant women with hypertension disorders (n = 351) according to the distance between their living/working places and coastline sargassum strandings are presented in Table 3. Pregnant women with hypertension disorders exposed to sargassum emission (living/working places and coastline within 2 km of sargassum strandings) have shorter-term pregnancies, gave birth to a newborn of lower weight, and were more prone to HELLP syndrome complication compared to unexposed pregnant women with hypertension disorders (Table 3). Exposed and unexposed pregnant women with hypertension disorders had similar blood marker levels.
The univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnant women are displayed Table 4. The multivariate analysis further highlights this increased risk of hypertension disorders in pregnant women within a living/working distance of 2 km from coastline sargassum stranding sites (odds ratio (OR): 1.59 (1.09–2.34) p = 0.017). Significantly increased ORs were also observed for age, BMI, personal history of sickle cell disease, primipaternity, increased weight gain, and gestational diabetes (Table 4).
The continuous monitoring of air pollutants (O3, NOx, NO2, and SO2) and ambient particulate matter during the study period indicated that these pollutants remained within threshold values defining optimal air quality (recommendations of the French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, and Sustainable Development). The only alert levels observed during the study period concerned ambient particulate matter PM10 concentrations in June 2018 and September 2018, distant time periods from the only massive stranding episode of that year (early March 2018). Because there were no differences in O3, NOx, NO2, SO2, and ambient particulate matters between exposed and unexposed participants, air pollution data were not considered in the logistic univariate and multivariate analyses.

4. Discussion

The present pioneer work, all while confirming the previously reported general clinical syndrome associated with chronic exposure to sargassum emissions [1,3,4], further suggests a potential deleterious effect of these emissions on cardiovascular function in pregnant women. For the first time, we described that chronic exposure to sargassum H2S is potentially associated with the risk of hypertension disorders during pregnancy. In pregnant women, sargassum emission exposure was found an independent risk factor of hypertensive disorders in addition to the typical risk factors of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy such as age, body mass index, primipaternity, and gestational diabetes [35].
The accumulation of sargassum has been increasingly causing environmental and socio-economic challenges in recent years, particularly along the Caribbean coasts [1,2,3,4]. Despite active collecting, the inundation and compaction of large amounts of sargassum seaweed on shore result in their bacterial putrefaction, leading to the production of nonvolatile and volatile compounds, including hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and ammonia (NH3). While the acute toxicities of H2S and NH3 have been well established, the clinical symptomatology associated with chronic exposure to sargassum gaseous emissions have not been extensively studied.
In our study, exposure to sargassum emissions was indirectly determined by the distance between their residence and/or workplace and sargassum strandings. Pregnant women identified as exposed to increased ambient H2S and NH3 levels were living and/or working in areas within a distance of <2 km from the nearest ground sensor. H2S exposure was based on specific sensors deployed since 2016 along the Atlantic coast in anticipation of massive deposits. It was estimated in our study that pregnant women living/working in areas ≤2 km from sargassum stranding sites were exposed to a mean H2S concentration of 0.17 ± 0.49 ppm during their overall pregnancy duration.
The observation of a potential higher risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnant women living/working near sargassum strandings is in contradiction with the large body of literature, which rather describes H2S as a vasodilation molecule with protective action in systemic arterial hypertension [18,19,20,21]. At the vascular level, H2S can induce endothelium-independent and endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation through mechanisms involving the activation of KATP channels on vascular smooth muscle cells, voltage-dependent calcium channel inactivation, and release of the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor [21,22]. On the contrary, H2S can induce vasoconstriction under certain conditions through mechanisms involving the quenching or inactivation of nitric oxide (NO) and the inhibition of endothelial cell NO synthase. NO-independent mechanisms have also been reported, including changes in calcium and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) concentrations in vascular smooth muscle cells and Rho kinase signaling pathway activation [20,23,24,25,26,27,36,37]. Furthermore, it was recently shown that the single electron oxidation of H2S by oxyhemoglobin generates a hydrosulfide radical (HS), which causes vasoconstriction via an L-type calcium channel-dependent pathway and thus can exert systemic arterial hypertension [28]. Therefore, the cardiovascular effects of H2S are by nature bidirectional.
In addition to the vascular dysfunction elicited by H2S, previous experimental studies have reported that inhaling H2S may induce central metabolic and hemodynamic changes, including reduced energy expenditure and hypothermia, and reduced cardiac output, while blood pressure and stroke volume remained unaffected [38,39]. It is, hence, possible that H2S may have limited the physiological increase in cardiac output during the course of pregnancy, which may induce an excessive vasoconstriction and increased blood pressure in exposed pregnant women. Such central hemodynamic maladaptation along with the direct vascular effects of H2S could be responsible for the pregnancy hypertensive disorders observed in our study. In our study, standard biochemistry markers, C reactive protein, blood count, and coagulation tests did not show significant differences between pregnant women exposed to sargassum emissions and those without. Due to the retrospective nature of our study, no attempt was made to explore cardiovascular function through cardiac biomarkers such brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) and vascular NO biodisponibility through the blood concentration of nitrites/nitrates (NO2/NO3).
Studies seeking to analyze adverse human health effects associated with chronic exposure to H2S have defined low-level exposures as H2S concentrations below 0.1 ppm, medium-level ones as between 0.1 and 1 ppm, and high-level exposures as above 1 ppm [8]. Ambient low H2S concentration may be related to a variety of sources including geothermal and volcanic emissions and anthropogenic sources, such as confined animal feeding operations, oil and gas facilities, paper mills, and waste-water plants. At low H2S concentrations, chronic exposure has been associated with either weak positive and negative associations with outcomes such as ischemic heart disease mortality, acute myocardial infarction mortality, and hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases. Pregnant women living/working in areas ≤2 km from sargassum stranding sites who developed hypertensive disorders were exposed to a mean H2S concentration of 0.17 ± 0.49 ppm, which may be considered a medium level of H2S exposure. The deleterious cardiovascular effects of sargassum emissions in our study are consistent with previous reports showing that exposure to low-medium H2S levels was associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors [40,41,42,43,44].

5. Study Limitations

Several study limitations are to be noted in our exploratory research. Firstly, exposure to sargassum stranding was approximated by the closest ground H2S sensor, which might not reflect actual individual exposure. Unfortunately, a more accurate assessment of individual exposure was not possible with the current study design, notably by the implementation of personal gas detectors or the consideration of a proxy exposure indicator better modelling gas dispersion effects according to distance, landscape, and climatic parameters. Also, the sensor detection of gases emitted by decomposing sargassum seaweed was solely limited to ambient H2S and NH3, which might not reflect the overall patient exposure to the multitude of toxic gases contained in these emissions, as well as any potential physicochemical interaction between the different gases present. Of note, previous studies have detected heavy metals in sargassum (arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd)) as well as other potentially toxic elements (lithium (Li), molybdenum (Mo), cesium (Cs), and uranium (U)) that may impact cardiovascular health. Specifically, arsenic exposure has been associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. It is thus expected that, since arsenic is released by sargassum decomposition, chronic arsenic exposure could play a part in an adverse hypertensive outcome in pregnant women.
Secondly, while remaining under threshold values defining optimal air quality, the association between air pollution (O3, NOx, NO2, SO2, and fine particle matter PM10 and PM2.5) and hypertensive disorders was not specifically evaluated. Numerous studies have, however, identified investigated the impact of air pollution on human health, which strongly suggest that exposure to fine particles and air pollutant gases is associated with the atherosclerosis process and onset of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Sargassum influxes can accompanied by specific climatic and air pollution episodes such as Saharan dust haze. During the study period of January 2016–July 2020, the only alert for Saharan dust haze was recorded in June 2018 and in September 2018, a few months after the mass stranding described that year.
Thirdly, the retrospective nature of our study was responsible for the absence of consistent information (medical history) available in the medical patient file to adjust with pre-existing chronic hypertension. We acknowledge that individuals with pre-existing hypertension were at higher risks of developing gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia during pregnancy. Also, whether women were exposed or not to sargassum emission before pregnancy was not evaluated. The lack of precise residential data did not allow to study the association with a specific sensor data, hence individual concentrations of H2S and NH3.
Fourthly, confounding factors such as those related to sociodemographic and economic levels, housing, or maternal education were not considered. This is attributed to the retrospective nature of our study and the resulting lack of data reliability. In our study, we acknowledge that 49% of the patient’s report having employment, with 90% working near their residence.

6. Conclusions

Our work highlights a potential association between exposure to sargassum emissions and the risk of hypertensive events in pregnant women. The present study results strongly support the deleterious effect on cardiovascular health of pregnant women chronically exposed to sargassum gas emissions. These preliminary findings emphasize the importance of implementing health measures by health authorities to prevent pregnant women from being in areas where sargassum strands ashore.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph21121612/s1, Figure S1: Schematic map of the Martinique Island (black circles indicate the name of the city). Sargassum stranding intensity is color-coded (green: moderate intensity; orange: high intensity; red: very high intensity). Surface of the circle indicates the number of people exposed to emissions produced by decomposing sargassum in 2018.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: R.B., D.R. and R.N.; data curation: M.R.L., L.S., A.M., M.J.-L., J.F., F.R. and H.M.; formal analysis: R.B., D.R. and R.N.; writing—original draft preparation: R.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR; grant number: ANR-19-SARG-0001-01. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) “PO FEDER FSE 2014–2020; grant number: MQ0029280”, European Union.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The present study was conducted in accordance with the amended Declaration of Helsinki (https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/; accessed on 20 September 2024) and Good Clinical Practice guidelines (GCP European Directive 2005/28/EC; accessed on 20 September 2024). Written informed consent was systematically obtained from all patients. The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board of the University Hospital of Martinique (IRB 2023/033).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Pr. NEVIERE Remi from the Department of Clinical Physiology (CHU Martinique). Restrictions, however, apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and hence, are not publicly available. Study data will be available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission from NEVIERE Remi (remi.neviere@chu-martinique.fr).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the team of the Observatory of Air Quality in Martinique (Madininair) for the data available on its website. The authors wholeheartedly thank the patients and medical teams of the University Hospital of Martinique who contributed to this work. We convey special acknowledgement to the clinical team of the Sargassum Research Group and the Clinical and Environmental Toxicology Unit of the University Hospital of Martinique at the origin of the present research initiative.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Schmidt, C. Escape from Sargasso Sea: Tremendous Sargassum Blooms Challenge Caribbean and Atlantic Communities. Environ. Health Perspect. 2023, 131, 92001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Segaran, T.C.; Azra, M.N.; Handayani, K.S.; Lananan, F.; Xu, J. Seaweed and climate change: A mapping review. Mar. Environ. Res. 2023, 192, 106216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Resiere, D.; Valentino, R.; Neviere, R.; Banydeen, R.; Gueye, P.; Florentin, J.; Cabié, A.; Lebrun, T.; Mégarbane, B.; Guerrier, G.; et al. Sargassum seaweed on Caribbean islands: An international public health concern. Lancet 2019, 392, 2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Resiere, D.; Mehdaoui, H.; Florentin, J.; Gueye, P.; Lebrun, T.; Blateau, A.; Viguier, J.; Valentino, R.; Brouste, Y.; Kallel, H.; et al. Sargassum seaweed health menace in the Caribbean: Clinical characteristics of a population exposed to hydrogen sulfide during the 2018 massive stranding. Clin. Toxicol. 2021, 59, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yu, Y.; Morales-Rodriguez, A.; Zhou, G.; Barrón, D.; Sahuquillo, À.; López-Sánchez, J.F. Survey of arsenic content in edible seaweeds and their health risk assessment. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2024, 187, 114603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Legator, M.S.; Singleton, C.R.; Morris, D.L.; Philips, D.L. Health effects from chronic low-level exposure to hydrogen sulfide. Arch. Environ. Health 2001, 56, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lewis, R.J.; Copley, G.B. Chronic low-level hydrogen sulfide exposure and potential effects on human health: A review of the epidemiological evidence. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2015, 45, 93–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Batterman, S.; Grant-Alfieri, A.; Seo, S.H. Low level exposure to hydrogen sulfide: A review of emissions, community exposure, health effects, and exposure guidelines. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2023, 53, 244–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Van den Hooven, E.H.; de Kluizenaar, Y.; Pierik, F.H.; Hofman, A.; van Ratingen, S.W.; Zandveld, P.Y.; Mackenbach, J.P.; Steegers, E.A.; Miedema, H.M.; Jaddoe, V.W. Air pollution, blood pressure, and the risk of hypertensive complications during pregnancy: The generation R study. Hypertension 2011, 57, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, P.C.; Talbott, E.O.; Roberts, J.M.; Catov, J.M.; Bilonick, R.A.; Stone, R.A.; Sharma, R.K.; Ritz, B. Ambient air pollution exposure and blood pressure changes during pregnancy. Environ. Res. 2012, 117, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hu, H.; Ha, S.; Roth, J.; Kearney, G.; Talbott, E.O.; Xu, X. Ambient Air Pollution and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 97, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pedersen, M.; Stayner, L.; Slama, R.; Sørensen, M.; Figueras, F.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Dadvand, P. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 2014, 64, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nobles, C.J.; Williams, A.; Ouidir, M.; Sherman, S.; Mendola, P. Differential Effect of Ambient Air Pollution Exposure on Risk of Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Hypertension 2019, 74, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bai, W.; Li, Y.; Niu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhu, B.; Duan, R.; Duan, H.; Kou, C.; Li, Y.; et al. Association between ambient air pollution and pregnancy complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Environ. Res. 2020, 185, 109471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Decrue, F.; Townsend, R.; Miller, M.R.; Newby, D.; Reynolds, R.M. Ambient air pollution and maternal cardiovascular health in pregnancy. Heart 2023, 109, 1586–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cheng, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, L.; Shi, H.; Li, J.; Meng, X.; Xiao, X.; Dai, H.; Zhang, Y. Ozone Exposure During Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Hypertension or Preeclampsia in China. JAMA Netw. Open 2023, 6, e236347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ausma, T.; De Kok, L.J. Atmospheric H2S: Impact on Plant Functioning. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kolluru, G.K.; Shackelford, R.E.; Shen, X.; Dominic, P.; Kevil, C.G. Sulfide regulation of cardiovascular function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2023, 20, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shen, Y.; Shen, Z.; Luo, S.; Guo, W.; Zhu, Y.Z. The Cardioprotective Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide in Heart Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Potential. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2015, 2015, 925167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lv, B.; Chen, S.; Tang, C.; Jin, H.; Du, J.; Huang, Y. Hydrogen sulfide and vascular regulation—An update. J. Adv. Res. 2020, 27, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Song, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhong, Q.; Zhang, R.; Sun, X.; Chen, G. Sulfur signaling pathway in cardiovascular disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1303465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huang, D.; Jing, G.; Zhu, S. Regulation of Mitochondrial Respiration by Hydrogen Sulfide. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lim, J.J.; Liu, Y.H.; Khin, E.S.; Bian, J.S. Vasoconstrictive effect of hydrogen sulfide involves downregulation of cAMP in vascular smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2008, 295, C1261–C1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, S.; Ping, N.N.; Cao, L.; Mi, Y.-N.; Cao, Y.-X. H2S induces vasoconstriction of rat cerebral arteries via cAMP/adenylyl cyclase pathway. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2015, 289, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dunn, W.R.; Alexander, S.P.; Ralevic, V.; Roberts, R.E. Effects of hydrogen sulphide in smooth muscle. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 158, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Orlov, S.N.; Gusakova, S.V.; Smaglii, L.V.; Koltsova, S.V.; Sidorenko, S.V. Vasoconstriction triggered by hydrogen sulfide: Evidence for Na+,K+,2Cl-cotransport and L-type Ca2+ channel-mediated pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2017, 12, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mohammed, R.; Provitera, L.; Cavallaro, G.; Lattuada, D.; Ercoli, G.; Mosca, F.; Villamor, E. Vasomotor effects of hydrogen sulfide in human umbilical vessels. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2017, 68, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, T.; Zhang, M.; Hanson, S.; Juarez, R.; Wilson, S.; Schroeder, H.; Li, Q.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, G.; Blood, A.B. H2S Increases Blood Pressure via Activation of L-Type Calcium Channels with Mediation by HS Generated from Reactions with Oxyhemoglobin. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2305866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cindrova-Davies, T.; Herrera, E.A.; Niu, Y.; Kingdom, J.; Giussani, D.A.; Burton, G.J. Reduced cystathionine γ-lyase and increased miR-21 expression are associated with increased vascular resistance in growth-restricted pregnancies: Hydrogen sulfide as a placental vasodilator. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 1448–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, K.; Ahmad, S.; Cai, M.; Rennie, J.; Fujisawa, T.; Crispi, F.; Baily, J.; Miller, M.R.; Cudmore, M.; Hadoke, P.W.; et al. Dysregulation of hydrogen sulfide producing enzyme cystathionine γ-lyase contributes to maternal hypertension and placental abnormalities in preeclampsia. Circulation 2013, 127, 2514–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Possomato-Vieira, J.S.; Palei, A.C.; Pinto-Souza, C.C.; Cavalli, R.; Dias-Junior, C.A.; Sandrim, V. Circulating levels of hydrogen sulphide negatively correlate to nitrite levels in gestational hypertensive and preeclamptic pregnant women. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2021, 48, 1224–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Banydeen, R.; Lacavalerie, M.R.; Florentin, J.; Boullanger, C.; Medhaoui, H.; Resiere, D.; Neviere, R. Central sleep apnea and exposure to ambient hydrogen sulfide emissions from massive strandings of decomposing sargassum in the Caribbean. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 168886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Merle, H.; Resière, D.; Mesnard, C.; Pierre, M.; Jean-Charles, A.; Béral, L.; Nevière, R. Case Report: Two Cases of Keratoconjunctivitis Tied to Sargassum Algae Emanations. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 104, 403–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. De Lanlay, D.B.; Monthieux, A.; Banydeen, R.; Jean-Laurent, M.; Resiere, D.; Drame, M.; Neviere, R. Risk of preeclampsia among women living in coastal areas impacted by sargassum strandings on the French Caribbean Island of Martinique. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 94, 103894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hypertension in Pregnancy: Diagnosis and Management. Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng133/resources/hypertension-in-pregnancy-diagnosis-and-management-pdf-66141717671365 (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  36. Gheibi, S.; Jeddi, S.; Kashfi, K.; Ghasemi, A. Regulation of vascular tone homeostasis by NO and H2S: Implications in hypertension. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 149, 42–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ping, N.N.; Li, S.; Mi, Y.N.; Cao, L.; Cao, Y. H Hydrogen sulphide induces vasoconstriction of rat coronary artery via activation of Ca2+ influx. Acta Physiol. 2015, 214, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Blackstone, E.; Morrison, M.; Roth, M.B. H2S Induces a Suspended Animation-Like State in Mice. Science 2005, 308, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Volpato, G.P.; Searles, R.; Yu, B.; Scherrer-Crosbie, M.; Bloch, K.D.; Ichinose, F.; Zapol, W.M. Inhaled hydrogen sulfide: A rapidly reversible inhibitor of cardiac and metabolic function in the mouse. Anesthesiology 2008, 108, 659–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bustaffa, E.; Cori, L.; Manzella, A.; Nuvolone, D.; Minichilli, F.; Bianchi, F.; Gorini, F. The health of communities living in proximity of geothermal plants generating heat and electricity: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 706, 135998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bustaffa, E.; Minichilli, F.; Nuvolone, D.; Voller, F.; Cipriani, F.; Bianchi, F. Mortality of populations residing in geothermal areas of Tuscany during the period 2003–2012. Ann. Ist. Super Sanita 2017, 53, 108–117. [Google Scholar]
  42. Minichilli, F.; Nuvolone, D.; Bustaffa, E.; Cipriani, F.; Vigotti, M.A.; Bianchi, F. State of health of populations residing in geothermal areas of Tuscany. Epidemiol. Prev. 2012, 36, 1–104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Nuvolone, D.; Petri, D.; Biggeri, A.; Barbone, F.; Voller, F. Health effects associated with short-term exposure to hydrogen sulfide from geothermal power plants: A case-crossover study in the geothermal areas in Tuscany. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2020, 3, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gorini, F.; Bustaffa, E.; Chatzianagnostou, K.; Bianchi, F.; Vassalle, C. Hydrogen sulfide and cardiovascular disease: Doubts, clues, and interpretation difficulties from studies in geothermal areas. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 743, 140818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study flow chart of patient screening and inclusion. * indicates exposure status according to sargassum emissions.
Figure 1. Study flow chart of patient screening and inclusion. * indicates exposure status according to sargassum emissions.
Ijerph 21 01612 g001
Table 1. Main clinical and biological characteristics of pregnant women (study population N = 3020) according to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Table 1. Main clinical and biological characteristics of pregnant women (study population N = 3020) according to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Characteristics Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
All
N = 3020
Yes
N = 351
No
N = 2669
p-Value
Age, years29.8 ± 6.231.2 ± 7.029.6 ± 6.1<0.001 *
Age > 30 years1431 (47.4%)197 (56.1%)1234 (46.2%)<0.001 *
BMI, kg/m226.3 ± 6.830.1 ± 8.025.8 ± 6.4<0.001 *
BMI > 30 kg/m2 n = 28971325 (43.9%)224 (63.8%)1101 (41.3%)<0.001 *
Primiparity1430 (47.4%)188 (53.6%)1247 (46.7%)0.001 *
Primipaternity n = 20501675 (82%)215 (88%)1460 (81%)0.004 *
Twin pregnancy n = 301871 (2.4%)10 (2.8%)61 (2.3%)0.308
Active tobacco use n = 3014196 (6.5)24 (6.9%)172 (6.5%)0.417
Medical history
 Endometriosis60 (2.0%)7 (2.0%)53 (2.0%)0.557
 Thyroid diseases 55 (1.8%)4 (1.1%)51 (1.9%)0.216
 Chronic hypertension n = 301687 (2.9%)54 (15.5%)33 (1.2%)<0.001 *
 Diabetes90 (3.0%)26 (7.4%)64 (2.4%)<0.001 *
 Sickle cell disease 10 (0.3%)4 (1.1%)6 (0.2%)0.203
 Polycystic ovary syndrome49 (1.6%)8 (2.3%)41 (1.5%)0.365
 Personal pre-eclampsia 56 (1.9%)25 (7.1%)31 (1.2%)<0.001 *
Pregnancy outcome
 Term pregnancy, weeks38.7 ± 3.037.6 ± 3.938.9 ± 2.8<0.001 *
 Weight gain, kg11.0 ± 6.012.0 ± 7.410.9 ± 5.80.010 *
 Newborn weight, kg3.04 ± 0.672.77 ± 0.893.07 ± 0.62<0.001 *
 Apgar score 1th min8.9 ± 2.58.0 ± 3.29.0 ± 2.3<0.001 *
 Apgar score 5th min9.5 ± 1.78.9 ± 2.59.6 ± 1.6<0.001 *
 Umbilical cord blood lactate4.4 ± 3.45.2 ± 4.84.3 ± 3.00.061
Pregnancy complication
 Gestational diabetes274 (9.1%)70 (20.0%)204 (7.7%)<0.001 *
 Threat of premature labor690 (22.8%)111 (31.6%)579 (21.7)<0.001 *
 Pre-eclampsia194 (6.4%)194 (55.3%)0 (0%)<0.001 *
 Eclampsia4 (0.1%)4 (1.1%)0 (0.0)<0.001 *
 HELLP syndrome26 (0.9%)26 (7.4%)0 (0)<0.001 *
 Obstetrical hemorrhage127 (4.2%)28 (8.0%)99 (3.7%)<0.001 *
 Neonatal death66 (2.2%)19 (5.4%)47 (1.8%)<0.001 *
Biochemistry markers
 Urea, mmol/L3.0 ± 1.33.1 ± 1.13.0 ± 1.30,979
 Creatinine, µmol/L58.4 ± 13.558.1 ± 11.458.5 ± 13.80.833
 Total bilirubin, µmol/L9.7 ± 12.38.8 ± 6.610.1 ± 14.30.171
 Aspartate aminotransferase, IU/L43 ± 10553 ± 11138 ± 1010.046 *
 Alanine aminotransferase, IU/L30 ± 7739 ± 8525 ± 710.008 *
 Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L 181 ± 159201 ± 205171 ± 1300.009 *
 C reactive protein, mg/L 29 ± 4738 ± 5528 ± 460.003 *
Blood count and coagulation tests
 Red blood cells, million/mm34.0 ± 0.54.0 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.50.514
 Hemoglobin, g/dL11.0 ± 1.411.0 ± 1.511.0 ± 1.40.521
 Hematocrit, %33.9 ± 3.933.7 ± 4.533.9 ± 3.90.251
 White blood cells, mm−311.9 ± 4.312.9 ± 4.911.7 ± 4.2<0.001 *
 Neutrophils, %73.8 ± 10.076.5 ± 9.273.3 ± 10.0<0.001 *
 Lymphocytes, %18.1 ± 8.416.4 ± 7.718.4 ± 8.5<0.001 *
 Monocytes, %7.7 ± 2.37.3 ± 2.47.8 ± 2.30.001 *
 Eosinophils, %1.7 ± 1.72.1 ± 1.61.6 ± 1.7<0.001 *
 Basophils, %0.37± 0.210.43 ± 0.230.36 ± 0.20<0.001 *
 Platelets, ×10 µL−1232 ± 70221 ± 73234 ± 690.001 *
 Fibrinogen, g/L4.7 ± 1.04.6 ± 1.14.7 ± 1.00.031 *
 PT, %104 ± 14103 ± 15104 ± 140.111
 APTT, s.29 ± 929 ± 328 ± 100.375
Environmental exposure
 H2S concentration (ppm)0.036 ± 0.2360.073 ± 0.3750.032 ± 0.2110.002 *
 NH3 concentration (ppm)0.052 ± 0.1840.063 ± 0.2070.037 ± 0.1460.188
 Active sargassum strandings653 (21.6%)87 (24.8%)566 (21.2)0.073
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count; TP, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thrombosplatin time. Data are represented as mean ± SD or absolute value (%); * statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Main clinical and biological characteristics of pregnant women (study population N = 3020) according to sargassum exposure.
Table 2. Main clinical and biological characteristics of pregnant women (study population N = 3020) according to sargassum exposure.
Characteristics Sargassum Stranding Exposure
All N = 3020Yes (N = 653)No N = 2367p-Value
Age, years29.8 ± 6.230.3 ± 6.629.7 ± 6.10.021 *
Age > 30 years1431 (47.4%)322 (49.3%)1109 (46.9%)0.142
BMI, kg/m226.3 ± 6.826.2 ± 7.526.2 ± 6.60.241
BMI > 30 kg/m2 n = 28971325 (43.9%)320 (49%)1110 (47%)0.386
Primiparity1430 (47.4%)188 (54%)1247 (47%)0.607
Primipaternity n = 20501675 (82%)371 (82%)1304 (82%)0.394
Twin pregnancy n = 301871 (2.4%)12 (1.8%)59 (2.5%)0.204
Active tobacco use n = 3014196 (6.5)39 (6.0%)157 (6.6%)0.309
Medical history
 Endometriosis60 (2.0%)18 (2.8%)42 (1.8%)0.079
 Thyroid diseases55 (1.8%)13 (2.0%)42 (1.8%)0.409
 Chronic hypertension n = 301687 (2.9%)23 (3.5%)64 (2.7%)0.164
 Diabetes90 (3.0%)24 (3.7%)66 (2.8%)0.147
 Sickle cell disease10 (0.3%)2 (0.3%)8 (0.3%)0.628
 Polycystic ovary syndrome49 (1.6%)8 (1.2%)41 (1.7%)0.237
 Personal pre-eclampsia56 (1.9%)16 (2.5%)40 (1.7%)0.134
Pregnancy outcome
 Term pregnancy, weeks38.7 ± 3.038.6 ± 3.038.8 ± 3.00.364
 Weight gain, kg11.0 ± 6.011.3 ± 5.711.0 ± 6.10.322
 Newborn weight, kg3.04 ± 0.673.01 ± 0.673.04 ± 0.660.237
 Apgar score 1th min8.9 ± 2.58.8 ± 2.58.9 ± 2.50.235
 Apgar score 5th min9.5 ± 1.79.5 ± 1.79.5 ± 1.70.339
 Umbilical cord blood lactate4.4 ± 3.44.5 ± 3.04.4 ± 3.50.800
Pregnancy complication
 Gestational diabetes274 (9.1%)53 (8.1%)221 (9.4%)0.186
 Threat of premature labor690 (22.8%)150 (23.0%)540 (22.8)0.485
 Hypertensive disorders353 (11.7%)89 (13.6%)264 (11.2%)0.049 *
 Pre-eclampsia194 (6.4%)49 (7.5%)145 (6.1%)0.120
 Eclampsia4 (0.1%)0 (0%)4 (0.2%)0.377
 HELLP syndrome26 (0.9%)11 (1.7%)15 (0.6%)0.014 *
 Obstetrical hemorrhage127 (4.2%)28 (4.3%)99 (4.2%)0.489
 Neonatal death66 (2.2%)13 (2.0%)53 (2.2%)0.908
Biochemistry markers
 Urea, mmol/L3.0 ± 1.33.1 ± 1.13.0 ± 1.30.828
 Creatinine, µmol/L58.4 ± 13.558.1 ± 11.458.5 ± 13.80.762
 Total bilirubin, µmol/L9.7 ± 12.38.8 ± 6.610.1 ± 14.30.434
 Aspartate aminotransferase, IU/L43 ± 10553 ± 11138 ± 1010.144
 Alanine aminotransferase, IU/L30 ± 7739 ± 8525 ± 710.180
 Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L181 ± 159201 ± 205171 ± 1300.314
 C reactive protein, mg/L29 ± 4729 ± 4430 ± 480.734
Blood count and coagulation tests
 Red blood cells, million/mm34.0 ± 0.54.0 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.50.466
 Hemoglobin, g/dL11.0 ± 1.410.9 ± 1.411.0 ± 1.40.628
 Hematocrit, %33.9 ± 3.933.8 ± 4.033.9 ± 3.90.655
 White blood cells, mm−311.9 ± 4.311.7 ± 4.011.9 ± 4.40.319
 Neutrophils, %73.8 ± 10.073.7 ± 9.373.8 ± 10.00.866
 Lymphocytes, %18.1 ± 8.416.4 ± 7.718.4 ± 8.50.920
 Monocytes, %7.7 ± 2.37.7 ± 2.27.7 ± 2.30.475
 Eosinophils, %1.7 ± 1.71.9 ± 1.81.7 ± 1.60.023 *
 Basophils, %0.37± 0.210.38 ± 0.210.37 ± 0.210.366
 Platelets, ×10 µL−1232 ± 70234 ± 76231 ± 680.362
 Fibrinogen, g/L4.7 ± 1.04.6 ± 1.14.7 ± 1.00.946
 PT, %104 ± 14103 ± 15104 ± 140.282
 APTT, s.29 ± 929 ± 729 ± 100.916
Environmental exposure
 H2S concentration (ppm)0.036 ± 0.2360.169 ± 0.4860 ± 0<0.001 *
 NH3 concentration (ppm)0.052 ± 0.1840.073 ± 0.2420 ± 0<0.001 *
 Mean NO2 concentration, µg·m−37.2 ± 0.97.2 ± 0.97.3 ± 0.90.123
 Mean SO2 concentration, µg·m−37.7 ± 3.87.5 ± 3.97.8 ± 3.70.496
 Mean O3 concentration, µg·m−345.0 ± 8.444.7 ± 8.445.2 ± 8.50.634
 Mean PM10 concentration, µg·m−322.5 ± 3.222.6 ± 3.322.4 ± 3.10.598
 Mean PM2.5 concentration, µg·m−312.8 ± 3.113.2 ± 2.912.3 ± 4.10.673
Abbreviations: APTT, activated partial thrombosplatin time; BMI, body mass index; HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, andlow platelet count; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; O3, ozone; PM2.5, fine particulate matter of ≤2.5 μm in diameter; PM10; particulate matter of ≤10 μm in diameter; SO2, sulfur dioxide; TP, prothrombin time. Data are represented as mean ± SD or absolute value (%); * statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Table 3. Main clinical and biological characteristics of pregnant women with hypertensive disorders (study population (N = 351) according to according to sargassum exposure.
Table 3. Main clinical and biological characteristics of pregnant women with hypertensive disorders (study population (N = 351) according to according to sargassum exposure.
Characteristics Sargassum Stranding Exposure
All N = 351Yes N = 87No N = 264p-Value
Age, years31.2 ± 7.031.6 ± 7.331.1 ± 6.90.523
Age > 30 years197 (56.1%)50 (56.2%)147 (55.7%)0.518
BMI, kg/m230.1 ± 8.029.6 ± 7.730.3 ± 8.10.481
BMI > 30 kg/m2224 (63.8%)53 (63.1%)171 (66.3%)0.342
Primiparity188 (53.6%)48 (55%)140 (53%)0.129
Primipaternity n = 245215 (88%)57 (89%)158 (87%)0.451
Twin pregnancy 10 (2.8%)1 (1.1%)9 (3.4%)0.245
Active tobacco use n = 34924 (6.9%)8 (9.3%)16 (6.1%)0.214
Medical history
 Endometriosis7 (2.0%)4 (4.6%)3 (1.1%)0.067
 Thyroid diseases 4 (1.1%)1 (1.1%)3 (1.1%)0.682
 Chronic hypertension54 (15.4%)18 (20.7%)36 (13.6%)0.082
 Diabetes26 (7.4%)5 (5.7%)21 (8.0%)0.339
 Sickle cell disease 4 (1.1%)0 (0%)4 (1.5%)0.318
 Polycystic ovary syndrome8 (2.3%)1 (1.1%)7 (2.7%)0.370
 Personal pre-eclampsia 25 (7.1%)10 (11.5%)15 (5.7%)0.061
Pregnancy outcome
 Term pregnancy, weeks37.6 ± 3.937.6 ± 3.938.9 ± 2.80.006 *
 Weight gain, kg12.0 ± 7.411.7 ± 7.212.0 ± 7.50.714
 Newborn weight, kg2.77 ± 0.892.56 ± 0.962.84 ± 0.850.011 *
 Apgar score 1th min8.0 ± 3.27.5 ± 3.58.1 ± 3.20.143
 Apgar score 5th min8.9 ± 2.58.5 ± 3.09.1 ± 2.40.076
 Umbilical cord blood lactate5.2 ± 4.84.2 ± 3.05.6 ± 5.30.399
Pregnancy complication
 Gestational diabetes70 (20.0%)17 (19.8%)53 (20.1%)0.543
 Threat of premature labor111 (31.6%)31 (35.6%)80 (30.3%)0.213
 Pre-eclampsia194 (55.3%)49 (56.3%)145 (54.9%)0.460
 Eclampsia4 (1.1%)0 (0%)4 (1.5)0.318
 HELLP syndrome26 (7.4%)11 (12.6%)15 (5.7%)0.032 *
 Obstetrical hemorrhage28 (8.0%)8 (9.3%)20 (7.6%)0.377
 Neonatal death19 (5.4%)13 (2.0%)6 (2.2%)0.198
Biochemistry markers
 Urea, mmol/L3.1 ± 1.12.8 ± 1.13.2 ± 1.10,248
 Creatinine, µmol/L58.1 ± 11.456.1 ± 14.959.1 ± 10.20.419
 Total bilirubin, µmol/L8.8 ± 6.68.7 ± 7.39.0 ± 6.40.171
 Aspartate aminotransferase, IU/L53 ± 11171 ± 18146 ± 670.082
 Alanine aminotransferase, IU/L39 ± 8551 ± 12035 ± 670.149
 Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L 201 ± 205238 ± 365188 ± 800.062
 C reactive protein, mg/L 38 ± 5540 ± 5836 ± 530.632
Blood count and coagulation tests
 Red blood cells, million/mm34.0 ± 0.63.9 ± 0.64.0 ± 0.60.100
 Hemoglobin, g/dL11.0 ± 1.510.8 ± 1.511.0 ± 1.50.415
 Hematocrit, %33.7 ± 4.533.7 ± 4.533.9 ± 3.90.251
 White blood cells, mm−312.9 ± 4.912.8 ± 4.312.9 ± 5.10.841
 Neutrophils, %76.5 ± 9.276.2 ± 9.176.6 ± 9.30.709
 Lymphocytes, %16.4 ± 7.717.0 ± 7.816.2 ± 7.60.412
 Monocytes, %7.3 ± 2.47.5 ± 2.57.3 ± 2.40.377
 Eosinophils, %2.1 ± 1.62.2 ± 1.72.0 ± 1.60.472
 Basophils, %0.43± 0.230.46 ± 0.250.42 ± 0.220.201
 Platelets, ×10 µL−1221 ± 73224 ± 91218 ± 670.556
 Fibrinogen, g/L4.6 ± 1.14.6 ± 1.24.5 ± 1.10.547
 PT, %103 ± 15102 ± 15103 ± 140.546
 APTT, s.29 ± 329 ± 329 ± 30.754
Environmental exposure
 H2S concentration (ppm)0.073 ± 0.3750.297 ± 0.7130 ± 0<0.001 *
 NH3 concentration (ppm)0.047 ± 0.1810.0797 ± 0.2360 ± 0<0.001 *
 Mean NO2 concentration, µg·m−37.2 ± 0.97.2 ± 0.97.3 ± 0.90.123
 Mean SO2 concentration, µg·m−37.7 ± 3.87.5 ± 3.97.8 ± 3.70.496
 Mean O3 concentration, µg·m−345.0 ± 8.444.7 ± 8.445.2 ± 8.50.634
 Mean PM10 concentration, µg·m−322.5 ± 3.222.6 ± 3.322.4 ± 3.10.598
 Mean PM2.5 concentration, µg·m−313.4 ± 2.313.0 ± 3.113.8 ± 2.40.676
Abbreviations: APTT, activated partial thrombosplatin time; BMI, body mass index; HELLP, Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; O3, ozone; PM2.5, fine particulate matter of ≤2.5 μm in diameter; PM10; particulate matter of ≤10 μm in diameter; SO2, sulfur dioxide; TP, prothrombin time. Data are represented as mean ± SD or absolute value (%); * statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Logistic univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnant women.
Table 4. Logistic univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnant women.
Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
OR (95% CI)p-ValueOR (95% CI)p-Value
Age 1.045 (0.997–1.09)0.159 *1.05 (1.02–1.07)0.001
BMI 1.07 (1.03–1.10)<0.001 *1.08 (1.05–1.10)<0.001
Nulliparity0.91 (0.75–1.10)0.339
Active tobacco use1.29 (0.67–2.47)0.448
Medical history
 Endometriosis0.72 (0.24–2.18)0.562
 Diabetes2.09 (0.87–5.03)0.099 *
 Sickle cell disease 18.64 (1.95–178.30)0.011 *18.11 (2.15–152.57)0.008
 Polycystic ovary syndrome2.06 (0.83–5.14)0.120 *
Pregnancy
 Primipaternity2.37 (1.30–4.33)0.005 *2.52 (1.50–4.24)0.001
 Twin pregnancy0.83 (0.28–2.42)0.729
 Weight gain 1.06 (1.03–1.08)<0.001 *1.05 (1.03–1.08)<0.001
 Gestational diabetes1.82 (1.08–3.07)0.024 *2.04 (1.26–3.30)0.004
Environmental exposure
 Sargassum stranding (H2S exposure)1.37 (0.90–2.10)0.146 *1.59 (1.09–2.34)0.017
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; OR: odds ratio; CI: Confidence Interval. Variables with a significant association in univariate analysis (* p < 0.25) were considered for multivariate analysis. Variables entered into the multivariate modeling: age, BMI, primipaternity, history of diabetes, history of sickle cell disease, weight gain, gestational diabetes, and sargassum stranding exposure. Statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banydeen, R.; Rejaudry Lacavalerie, M.; Savoyen, L.; Monthieux, A.; Jean-Laurent, M.; Florentin, J.; Radouani, F.; Mehdaoui, H.; Resiere, D.; Neviere, R. Sargassum Inundations and the Risk of Hypertension Disorders Among Pregnant Women Living in the French Caribbean Island of Martinique. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121612

AMA Style

Banydeen R, Rejaudry Lacavalerie M, Savoyen L, Monthieux A, Jean-Laurent M, Florentin J, Radouani F, Mehdaoui H, Resiere D, Neviere R. Sargassum Inundations and the Risk of Hypertension Disorders Among Pregnant Women Living in the French Caribbean Island of Martinique. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2024; 21(12):1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121612

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banydeen, Rishika, Mickael Rejaudry Lacavalerie, Loic Savoyen, Alice Monthieux, Mehdi Jean-Laurent, Jonathan Florentin, Fatima Radouani, Hossein Mehdaoui, Dabor Resiere, and Remi Neviere. 2024. "Sargassum Inundations and the Risk of Hypertension Disorders Among Pregnant Women Living in the French Caribbean Island of Martinique" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 21, no. 12: 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121612

APA Style

Banydeen, R., Rejaudry Lacavalerie, M., Savoyen, L., Monthieux, A., Jean-Laurent, M., Florentin, J., Radouani, F., Mehdaoui, H., Resiere, D., & Neviere, R. (2024). Sargassum Inundations and the Risk of Hypertension Disorders Among Pregnant Women Living in the French Caribbean Island of Martinique. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(12), 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121612

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop