Next Article in Journal
The Prevalence of Symptomatology and Risk Factors in Mental Health in Mexico: The 2016–17 ENCODAT Cohort
Previous Article in Journal
Rehabilitation Outcomes Following Hip Fracture of Home-Based Exercise Interventions Using a Wearable Device—A Randomized Controlled Pilot and Feasibility Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph20043108
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition of Earthworm (Dendrobaena veneta Rosa) Biomass Is Suitable as an Alternative Protein Source

by
Mariola Garczyńska
1,*,
Joanna Kostecka
1,
Grzegorz Pączka
1,
Anna Mazur-Pączka
1,
Tomasz Cebulak
2 and
Kevin R. Butt
3
1
Department of the Basis of Agriculture and Waste Management, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Land Management and Environmental Protection, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, ul. Cwiklinskiej 2, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland
2
Department of Food Technology and Human Nutrition, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszow, 4 Zelwerowicza Str., 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland
3
School of Natural Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 3108; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043108
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 6 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The selected chemical composition (dry matter, ash, total protein, and crude fat) of the integumentary muscles of Dendrobaena veneta were determined, plus the dry matter (DM) percentage content of 17 amino acids and the profile (%) of fatty acids. Results were compared with a more fully studied earthworm, Eisenia fetida. In addition, the composition of exogenous amino acids was compared to the WHO standard for pork, beef, and chicken eggs. Both earthworm species were grown on the same kitchen waste, and protein composition was analyzed using the same methods. Studies indicated that the muscle of D. veneta was characterized by a high level of protein (76.82% DM). A similar content of exogenous amino acids was observed in the protein of both earthworms, but for phenylalanine and isoleucine, slightly higher levels were recorded for E. fetida. More histidine, lysine, threonine, isoleucine, and arginine were found in earthworms compared with chicken egg white. Fatty acids play an essential role in balancing human or animal feed and their content determines the dietary and nutritional value of the food. Both earthworm species contained the appropriate content of saturated and unsaturated acids. In D. veneta, a higher content of arachidonic acid was found, and in E. fetida, lauric, tridecanoic, and palmitic acids were present. Future issues of food security may force us to seriously consider earthworm protein for indirect or even direct human consumption.

1. Introduction

Sustainable food production is a priority in agriculture, along with the protection of agroecosystems, and the awareness of public health. Food systems require the development of sustainable agricultural practices, balanced distribution systems, the creation of a sustainable diet, and a reduction in food waste. It is estimated that by 2025, the world’s population will reach over 8 billion, which is likely to be associated with food insecurity [1,2].
According to the McGuire [3], food production may double by 2030; however, factors limiting this include a constant decrease in area of agricultural land and a reduction in global freshwater resources, which makes animal breeding more difficult due to higher maintenance costs [2]. To satisfy the nutritional needs of the human population, a search for less conventional sources of nutrients is required, as in 2019, protein of animal origin provided only 55% of the total human needs in Europe [4,5,6,7,8,9]. By contrast, the intensification of animal production has led to the search for a less expensive feed of the highest quality. A promising alternative to vertebrate protein is that obtained from invertebrates (e.g., from the integumentary muscles of earthworms or from some insect species) [10,11]. These alternative protein sources have great potential as dietary components due to their high nutritional value, primarily the complete protein and fat content. The major factor limiting this source as food for humans is the lack of acceptance in many European countries and its limited availability. Current and future trends are moving towards the search for “superfoods”, and earthworm biomass is nutritionally attractive. Recipes for dishes with the inclusion of earthworms were already known in the 1970s [12]. The problem is with non-acceptance of this alternative food. Conti et al. [13] and Verneau et al. [14] indicate that the best solution to this problem may be the invisible inclusion of invertebrates (earthworms and insects) in food products.
Earthworm biomass has interesting nutritional properties, but in order to be commercialized as a product for human consumption and/or as animal feed, it must be safe for the final consumer. To ensure appropriate safety standards, the finished alternative food product should undergo a hygienic and sanitary assessment and it is necessary to assess the microbiological profile of the food, process hygiene indicators and additionally examine the chemical profile for possible presence of pesticide residues and toxic elements [15].
Conti et al. [16], analyzed the microbiological composition of fresh earthworms Eisenia fetida and earthworm meal (freeze-dried and dried, produced from fruit and vegetable waste). All samples showed the absence of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2073/2005 [17]. Studies have shown that both fresh earthworms and earthworm meal can be a safe food in terms of microbiological criteria. As in the case of the production of other edible terrestrial invertebrates, appropriate technological treatment, packaging, and storage conditions should be ensured to prevent microbiological contamination. Therefore, an important step to provide consumers with safer products should be the establishment of specific guidelines for the production and commercialization of earthworms if they are to be bred for human consumption.
Considering the continuous growth of the global human population, the demand for nutrients, including complete protein, will also increase [6,9].
There are uncertainties in the world related to the number of known species of earthworm. Sims and Gerard [18] recognized 3000 species, Sinha et al. [19] reported 4400, while Grdiša et al. [20] reported that 7000 species had been recorded. Approximately 40 of these species have been described in Poland, of which some, e.g., D. veneta or E. fetida, can be easily bred as they are used in the vermicomposting process of selected organic waste [21,22,23]. This process allows the transformation of segregated organic waste into biofertilizer-vermicompost, which can form a part of the circular economy [24]. However, the earthworm biomass produced can also be used as an alternative food source for animal and even human nutrition [7]. In studies evaluating the acceptance of rice wafers, either pure or enriched with earthworm protein, it transpired that social acceptance was mainly based on the way the information was presented on the label. Distinguishing high health and nutritional values was a factor that encouraged consumers to buy this product, which was particularly visible among men, while women behaved more conservatively. We are at the beginning of the journey to introduce new foods, and it seems that there is a certain consumer acceptance of such products. More time and appropriate actions are needed to further convince consumers of the naturalness of products enriched with invertebrate proteins [25].
Numerous studies indicate the possibility of using the biomass of selected species of earthworms obtained from vermiculture (E. fetida, Eisenia andrei, Peronyx excavatus, Eudrilus eugenigae or D. veneta) for fish nutrition [26,27,28], broilers [29,30] or pigs [31,32]. It should be noted that earthworm biomass forms a natural, valuable dietary component for numerous wild mammals, including red fox (Vulpes vulpes), raccoon (Procyon lotor), European badger (Meles meles) and brown bear (Ursus arctos) [33,34].
The current study aimed to determine selected nutritional indicators of D. veneta (amino acid and fatty acid profile), grown on kitchen waste, compared with those of E. fetida, in addition to the composition of their essential amino acids in relation to the WHO standard [1] for pork meat, beef and chicken eggs, and thus to assess the suitability of earthworm protein as a potential option for animal and/or human consumption.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material

The material used in the study consisted of Dendrobaena veneta (Rosa 1886) obtained from a long-term breeding program conducted at the Department of the Basis of Agriculture and Waste Management at the University of Rzeszów. This species is of Holarctic origin and originally inhabited Asia Minor and the Caucasus, from where it was brought to an artificially created environment rich in organic matter [35]. It is characterized by a short life cycle, where a complete cycle takes approximately 100–150 days, with sexual maturity reached after approximately 65 days [36] (Figure 1).

2.2. Laboratory-Scale D. veneta Biomass Production

Earthworm biomass production was carried out in vermireactors (n = 5) constructed of plastic containers with dimensions of 200 × 150 × 150 mm (length × width × height) (Figure 2) [37]. The base of each was perforated with small holes to drain the excess liquid. Each vermireactor was placed in a larger box so that their bases were not in contact (30 mm distance between them) to store excess leachate. Kitchen waste including boiled pasta (150 mL), bread (150 mL), potato (150 mL), and apple waste (150 mL) (600 mL in total) mixed with 300 mL of cellulose were placed in each vermireactor, and its remaining capacity was filled with a substrate in the form of a horticultural soil universal substrate for all ornamental plants, Floro-hum: pH 5.5–6.5, composed of highmoor peat, lowmoor peat, perlite, sand, microelements, and mineral fertilizer NPK [38]. Fifty individual, sexually mature earthworms were introduced into each vermireactor. Cultures were secured with a nylon mesh, which prevented earthworm escape, covered with cardboard to prevent the substrate from drying out and kept in a climatic chamber at 20 ± 0.5 °C [39].
To maintain appropriate humidity within the vermireactors, they were wetted every 10 days with the same amount of tap water (pH—7.5, conductivity—486 μS cm−1, nitrates (V)—8.5 mg·dm−3, nitrates (III)—0.01 mg·dm−3, Mg—14.2 mg·dm−3, water hardness—231 CaCO3 mg·dm−3). Analytical results were presented as the means and SD of five replicates.

2.3. Determination of Earthworm Chemical Composition

After a period of eight days, adult earthworms were selected from the vermireactors and examined for their chemical composition. After the contents were removed from their digestive tract, the bodies were assayed with the use of standard methods of fodder analysis given by AOAC 2003 [40] to identify the following parameters:
–
water content (according to PN-ISO1442, which involves drying the sample in an Ecocell laboratory dryer from BMT at a temperature of 103 ± 2 °C to obtain dry matter);
–
total ash (according to a method complying with PN-ISO936, which involves drying the analyzed sample, to be subsequently incinerated in a Snol muffle furnace at a temperature of (550 ± 25) °C, and after cooling down the mass of the residue is determined;
–
total nitrogen (with the Kjeldahl method in compliance with PN-75 A-04018, with conversion to protein);
–
fat (with the Soxhlet method in a Kjeltec 2200 apparatus manufactured by Boss. Before this, the samples were subjected to hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid);
–
contents of amino acids by Zeng et al. [41] (by hydrolyzing the sample with 6M HCl for 24 h at a temperature of 110 °C and rinsing with 0.1 molar solution of HCl and distilled water; the hydrolysate was then evaporated, and the residue was dissolved in a buffer of pH 2.2; the contents of amino acids were determined with the use of AAA-400 amino acid analyzer, which performs an assay based on liquid chromatography—following separation in the column, amino acids react with ninhydrin. The sulfur-containing amino acids were subjected to oxidizing hydrolysis with formic acid and hydrogen peroxide and then examined with AAA-400);
-
profile of fatty acids by Zhang et al. [42] (the samples were prepared following the Folch method (extraction with chloroform-methanol (2:1) mixture, methylation BF3/methanol). The profile was examined with a Varian 3400CX gas chromatograph, equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID), with the use of a CP-WAX column (length 50 m, diameter 0.53 mm); conditions of chromatograph operation: carrier gas—argon, the temperature of the dispenser −200 °C, temperature of the detector −240 °C, temperature of the column −60–220 °C). The analytical results of the fatty acid profiles were used to calculate the sum of saturated and unsaturated acids in fat. The content of amino acids and the profile of fatty acids in the fat of earthworms were determined in the material previously subjected to the freeze-drying process. Due to a lack of specific information on the chemical composition of D. veneta, research was undertaken to determine the content of protein and amino acids and the profile of fatty acids in the integumentary-muscular sacs as a possible raw material for use in product compositions for human and livestock nutrition. Thereafter, the composition of selected indicators of nutritional quality of integumentary-muscle sacs of D. veneta were compared with E. fetida, an earthworm for which much more information is available.

3. Results

Chemical Composition of the D. veneta Earthworm

Selected chemical components (dry mass, raw ash, total protein, and raw fat) of the body of worms cultivated on kitchen waste are shown in Table 1. Earthworms are characterized by high water content in the fresh mass. Therefore, the possibility of commercial use of integumentary-muscle sacs may depend on using them in a dried form, from which a concentrated source of nutrients can be obtained. Dry matter of D. veneta was determined to contain 5.17% ash, 76.82% protein, and 12.21% fat. The total protein content in the dried integumentary-muscle sacs of earthworms reached a level close to that of commercial protein concentrates.
The factors examined also included 17 endogenous and essential amino acids (Table 2) and the profile of fatty acids (Table 3). In the body of D. veneta, a beneficial presence of amino acids was found, which in the dried raw material corresponded to the nutritional value of a hen’s egg, as evidenced by a CPSP (hydrolyzed protein) index of 1.1.
Exogenous amino acid content diversity applies to all protein sources, including the protein derived from D. veneta. In the tested material, higher contents of exogenous amino acids were found in hen’s egg white in the case of phenylalanine, histidine, lysine, threonine, isoleucine, and arginine. In the case of protein derived from D. veneta, compared to the protein from E. fetida, we can only relate a higher content of the amino acids phenylalanine and isoleucine.
The dietary value and nutritional value in balancing food for humans or animal feed is also determined by the appropriate content of fatty acids (Table 3). In D. veneta, a higher content of arachidonic acid was found, and in E. fetida, the following acids were found: lauric, tridecanoic, and palmitic acids. In the case of monounsaturated fatty acids, two showed differentiations in both species—C16:1 palmitoleic acid (>E. fetida) and C22:1 euric acid (>D. veneta). The percentage of total polyunsaturated fatty acids in both species was similar, except for docosapentaenoic and clupanodonic acids in the bodies of D. veneta.

4. Discussion

Apart from vermicompost, earthworm biomass is also produced during vermicomposting and is attractive as it has a high nutritional value due to its protein content. As earthworms contain a low percentage of dry matter, they are classified as succulent fodder, with test results indicating that the dry matter content depended on the species (D. veneta (fed with kitchen residues—12.8% DM), E. fetida (fed with kitchen residues—17.8% DM; fed with cattle manure—18.2% DM)) [43,45]. For nutritional reasons, the amount of protein is essential, and exogenous amino acids mainly determine its value. Due to their content, earthworms are classified as high-protein feeds comparable with fish, meat, and bone meal [7,45,46].
Results indicated that high nutritional values characterize the protein of earthworms; the essential amino acid index CSPS% in D. veneta was 1.1 and so slightly exceeded the CSPS value for chicken egg white. However, it was 0.2 lower than muscle protein from E. fetida. In the study of Kostecka et al. [43], E. fetida and D. veneta, were fed kitchen leftovers and were characterized by a high content of essential amino acids. In the present comparison, it has been shown that the content of some exogenous amino acids differed within these two species. For example, in D. veneta, the content of phenylalanine and isoleucine were increased by 0.6 and 0.1% DM, respectively. Many authors have already drawn attention to the high content of exogenous amino acids, such as lysine, methionine, cystine, tryptophan, and threonine, in earthworm muscle [31,43,44,47].
According to Antonova et al. [7], the most crucial animal feed component is lysine, a combination of the amino acids methionine-cysteine and phenylalanine-tyrosine. No differences were found between D. veneta and E. fetida in lysine content, and content of the listed essential amino acids in D. veneta was high. Therefore, the dried mass of earthworm integumentary muscle sacs can be used as an animal feed ingredient. However, their use as a human food ingredient may raise some concerns due to the low nutritional acceptance of this type of product, especially in the culinary culture of European countries and North America. Nevertheless, for ethical and health reasons, the current trends point towards food with high health quality. Available research shows that one way to introduce such products for food purposes is to introduce them invisibly as one of the ingredients in a food product [13,14]. This type of solution is supported by Tedesco et al. [15], who showed that the meal produced from earthworm integumentary sacs is safe in microbiological and chemical terms (lack of pesticides and heavy metals), as a result of the use of kitchen waste, i.e., the raw material for earthworm culture has already passed the quality requirements for safe food.
Our studies also determined the fatty acid profile of D. veneta, as these perform many functions in the body, and a deficiency can cause many disorders. Numerous publications emphasize their great importance in human and animal nutrition, especially unsaturated acids [48,49,50]. The results obtained in this study indicated that the unsaturated acids in the fat of earthworms account for 54.30%, and the saturated acids account for 33.40%. The highest amount of unsaturated acids was oleic acid (30.70%), and the largest share of saturated acids was stearic acid (6.7%). Earthworm tissues contain predominantly long-chain fatty acids, which nonruminating mammals cannot synthesize, so earthworms can be an excellent dietary supplement. Determination of the fatty acid profile and the ratio of unsaturated to saturated acids is essential for the construction of a balanced diet for livestock [45].
Saturated acids perform a reserve and energy function, while unsaturated acids participate in metabolic processes, forming prostaglandins and prostacyclins. In the body of the tested D. veneta earthworms, the beneficial presence of many valuable saturated acids was found, e.g., palmitic acid and eicosanoic acid (arachidic acid); monounsaturated acids, e.g., oleic acid; and polyunsaturated acids, e.g., linoleic and eicosadienoic acids (Table 4). In both earthworm species, significant polyunsaturated fatty acids were also found—linoleic (C18:2) and linolenic (18:3) acids, which have a significant impact on human and animal health, and are also precursors in the synthesis of arachidic acid [50,51,52].
Using earthworm biomass obtained from vermiculture for animal nutrition is an opportunity to reduce the costs of their production thanks to vermicomposting technology. This may work in organic farms, where the excess biomass of E. fetida and D. veneta earthworms can be used to feed poultry, pigs, or fish. At the same time, periodic monitoring of the chemical composition of earthworms is needed because this may show variability depending on the food consumed or other abiotic factors. Major factors determining the use of earthworm biomass are the production volume and costs [43,45].
As far as human nutrition is concerned, attempts have also been made in this regard, but this applies mainly to Asian and South American countries [53,54,55]. In some countries, earthworms supplement the human diet [55]. For example, locally in China, people have been using earthworms as food for several centuries, and in Taiwan, Henan, and Guangdong provinces, unique dishes based on earthworms are still prepared. Meals prepared from earthworms can often have a better protein content and amino acid composition than that in fish or soybean meals [56].
Earthworms from the family Glossoscolecidae are, among others, an essential component of the diet of the Ye’Kuana Amerindian tribe, as they contain 70% protein [54,57]. It is confirmed by the average consumption of Andiorrhinus kuru and Andiorrhinus moto in Venezuela, which amounts to 1.7–2 kg per person per year. In the set of fatty acids of these earthworms, the beneficial arachidonic acid has a considerable proportion [54].
The factor limiting human consumption of food based on earthworms is the lack of acceptance in many European countries, which is why it is difficult to set rules for preparing and balancing a diet that includes these invertebrates. However, it is difficult to underestimate this possibility in times of food crisis and when seeking alternative food. After all, invertebrates may be an essential factor in solving the problem of global hunger and malnutrition [58].

5. Conclusions

The results indicated that the body of D. veneta is rich in nutrients, including available protein. Nevertheless, a critical factor for establishing a new trend in human and livestock nutrition is an appropriate content of exogenous amino acids. In the tested earthworms, a favorable content of these was found, which in the dried raw material corresponded to the nutritional value of a chicken egg, as evidenced by a CPSP index of 1.1. The second factor that could affect the proper dietary balance is fatty acids content, and the appropriate level of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids characterizes the tested earthworms.
Earthworm biomass fed on segregated kitchen waste could be used in human nutrition and as animal feed on an organic farm because, in times of food crisis, it is important to search for alternative sources of good quality food. The goal of producing commercial preparations based fully or partially on earthworms may soon be crucial and justified. Therefore, shaping a change in eating habits among Europeans and implementing the described animal nutrition preparations on an industrial scale may be a significant challenge in the coming years. Nevertheless, earthworm protein could certainly prove to be a real alternative source for animal feed and, possibly, for human consumption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.G.; methodology, M.G.; investigation, M.G., J.K., G.P., A.M.-P., T.C. and K.R.B.; data curation, M.G., G.P. and A.M.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.; writing—review and editing, M.G., T.C., J.K. and K.R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to reason (the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes requires the approval of the Ethics Committee on Animal Experiments for vertebrate species and cephalopods (representatives of invertebrates). The approval of the Ethics Committee is not required for other species of invertebrates (not under protection), which include earthworms).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation; WHO Technical Report Series; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; pp. 1–265. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43411 (accessed on 10 November 2022).
  2. Singh, R.; Srivastava, P.; Singh, P.; Upadhyay, S.; Raghubanshi, A.S. Human Overpopulation and Food Security: Challenges for the Agriculture Sustainability. In Urban Agriculture and Food Systems: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice; Information Resources Management Association: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 439–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McGuire, S. FAO, IFAD, and WFP. The state of food insecurity in the world 2015: Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: Taking stock of uneven progress. Rome: FAO, 2015. Adv. Nutr. 2015, 6, 623–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bueschke, M.; Kulczyński, B.; Gramza-Michałowska, A.; Kubiak, T. Alternative Sources of Protein in Human Nutrition. Sci. J. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. Probl. World Agric. 2017, 17, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bonnet, C.; Bouamra-Mechemache, Z.; Réquillart, V.; Treich, N. Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare. Food Policy 2020, 97, 101847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gedrovica, I. Assessment of earthworm (Lumbricidae) species suitably for processing into powder. Am. J. Entomol. 2020, 4, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Antonova, E.; Titov, I.; Pashkova, I.; Stom, D. Vermiculture as a source of animal protein. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 254, 08006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mariutti, L.R.B.; Rebelo, S.R.; Bisconsin-Junior, A.; Santos de Morais, J.; Magnani, M.; Maldonade, I.R.; Madeira, N.R.; Tiengo, A.; Maróstica, M.R.J.; Cazarin, C.B.B. The use of alternative food sources to improve health and guarantee access and food intake. Food Res. Int. 2021, 13, 3982–3992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vargas, A.M.; de Moura, A.P.; Deliza, R.; Cunha, L.M. The Role of Local seasonal foods in enhancing sustainable food consumption: A Systematic Literature Review. Foods 2021, 10, 2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lowe, C.N.; Butt, K.R.; Sherman, R.L. Current and Potential Benefits of Mass Earthworm Culture. In Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms. Invertebrates and Entomopathogens; Morales-Ramos, J., Rojas, G., Shapiro-Ilan, D.I., Eds.; Academic Press of Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 683–709. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kostecka, J.; Konieczna, K.; Cunha, L.M. Evaluation of insect-based food acceptance by representatives of Polish consumers in the context of natural resources processing retardation. J. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 18, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gaddie, R.; Douglas, D. Earthworm for Ecology and Profit; Bookworm Publishing Company: Ontario, CA, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  13. Conti, C.; Costa, A.; Balzaretti, C.M.; Russo, V.; Tedesco, D.E.A. Survey on food preferences of university students: From tradition to new food customs? Agriculture 2018, 8, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Verneau, F.; La Barbera, F.; Kolle, S.; Amato, M.; Del Giudice, T.; Grunert, K. The effect of communication and implicit associations on consuming insects: An experiment in Denmark and Italy. Appetite 2016, 106, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tedesco, D.E.A.; Castrica, M.; Tava, A.; Panseri, S.; Balzaretti, C.M. From a Food Safety Prospective: The Role of Earthworms as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security and in Valuing Food Waste. Insects 2020, 11, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Conti, C.; Castrica, M.; Balzaretti, C.M.; Tedesco, D.E.A. Edible earthworms in a food safety perspective: Preliminary data. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2019, 8, 7695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. European Commission. Regulation of 15 November 2005 on Microbiological Criteria for Foodstuffs, 2073/2005/EC. In Official Journal, L 338, 22 December 2005. 2005. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02005R2073-20140601&rid=1 (accessed on 5 February 2023).
  18. Sims, R.W.; Gerard, B.M. Earthworms. Notes for Identification of British Species; Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association: London, UK, 1999; Volume 13, 169p. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sinha, R.K.; Agarwal, S.; Chauhan, K.; Chandran, V.; Soni, B.K. Vermiculture Technology: Reviving the Dreams of Sir Charles Darwin for Scientific Use of Earthworms in Sustainable Development Programs. Technol. Invest. 2010, 1, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grdiša, M.; Gršić, K.; Grdiša, M.D. Earthworms—Role in soil fertility to the use in medicine and as a food. Invertebr. Surviv. J. 2013, 10, 38–45. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dominguez, J.; Edwards, C.A. Vermicomposting organic wastes: A review. In Soil Zoology for Sustain Development in the 21st Century; Hanna, S.H.S., Mikhall, W.Z.A., Eds.; S. H. Shakir Hanna: Cairo, Egypt, 2004; pp. 369–395. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kostecka, J.; Garczyńska, M.; Pączka, G. Food waste in the organic recycling system and a sustainable development. Probl. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 13, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  23. Garczyńska, M.; Pączka, G.; Podolak, A.; Mazur-Pączka, A.; Szura, R.; Butt, K.R.; Kostecka, J. Effects of Owinema biopreparation on vermicomposting in earthworm ecological boxes. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kangmin, L. Vermiculture in Circular Economy. Chinese Academy of Fishery. Sciences Freshwater Research Center Asian Pacific Regional Research and Training Center for Integrated Fish Farming. 2005. Available online: https://bestgro.com/Vermiculture%20Industry%20in%20Circular%20Economy.pdf (accessed on 12 November 2022).
  25. Russo, V.; Songa, G.; Marin, L.E.M.; Balzaretti, C.M.; Tedesco, D.E.A. Novel Food-Based Product Communication: A Neurophysiological Study. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kostecka, J.; Pączka, G. Possible use of earthworm Eisenia fetida (Sav.) biomass for breeding aquarium fish. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2006, 42, 231–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Monhata, K.N.; Subramanian, S.; Korikanthimath, V.S. Potential of earthworm (Eisenia foetida) as dietary protein source for rohu (Labeo rohita) advanced fry. Coget Food Agric. 2016, 2, 1138594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ngoc, T.N.; Pucher, J.; Becker, K.; Focken, U. Earthworm powder as an alternative protein source in diets for common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquac. Res. 2015, 47, 2917–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Loh, T.C.; Fong, L.Y.; Foo, H.L.; Thanh, N.T.; Sheikh-Omar, A.R. Utilisation of earthworm meal in partial replacement of soybean and fish meals in diets of broilers. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2009, 36, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rezeaeipour, V.; Nejad, O.A.; Miri, H.Y. Growth performance, blood metabolites and jejunum morphology of broiler chickens fed diets containing earthworm (Eisenia foetida) meal as a source of protein. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biom. Res. 2014, 2, 2483–2494. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sabine, J.R. Earthworms as a source of food and drugs. In Earthworm Ecology from Darvin to Vermiculture; Satchell, J.E., Ed.; Chapman & Halls: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 285–296. [Google Scholar]
  32. Edwards, C.A.; Arancon, N.Q. The use of earthworms in the breakdown of organic waste to produce vermicomposts and animals feed protein. In Earthworm Ecology; Edwards, C.A., Ed.; C.R.C. Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; pp. 345–379. [Google Scholar]
  33. MacDonald, D.W. Predation on earthworms by terrestrial vertebrates. In Earthworm Ecology: From Darwin to Vermiculture; Satchell, J.E., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1983; pp. 393–414. [Google Scholar]
  34. Edwards, C.A.; Bohlen, P.J. Biology and Ecology of Earthworms; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1996; 426p. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kasprzak, K. Soil oligochaetes, III. Family: Earthworms (Lumbricidae). In The Key to the Determination of Invertebrates in Poland; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1986; Volume 6, pp. 1–88. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dominguez, J.; Edwards, C.A. Biology and Ecology of Earthworm Species Used for Vermicomposting; Taylor & Francis Group, LLC: Abingdon, UK, 2011; pp. 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pączka, G.; Mazur-Pączka, A.; Garczyńska, M.; Kostecka, J.; Butt, K.R. Effects of Vermireactor Modifications on the Welfare of Earthworms Eisenia fetida (Sav.) and Properties of Vermicomposts. Agriculture 2020, 10, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Floro-Hum. Available online: https://www.floro.webd.pl/podloza.html (accessed on 31 January 2023).
  39. Kostecka, J. Investigation into vermicomposting of organic wastes. Sci. Pap. Agric. Univ. Crac. 2000, 268, 88. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  40. AOAC International. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th ed.; Association of Analytical Communities: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zeng, Y.; Cai, W.; Shao, X. Quantitative analysis of 17 amino acids in tobacco leaves using an amino acid analyzer and chemometric resolution. J. Sep. Sci. 2015, 38, 2053–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Liu, O. Development and validation of a GC–FID method for quantitative analysis of oleic acid and related fatty acid. J. Pharm. Anal. 2015, 5, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kostecka, J.; Garczyńska, M.; Pączka, G.; Mazur-Pączka, A. Chemical composition of earthworm (Eisenia fetida Sav.) biomass and selected determinants for its production. J. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 23, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ding, S.; Lin, X.; He, S. Earthworms: A Source of Protein. J. Food Sci. Eng. 2019, 9, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Borowiec, F.; Rościszewska, M.; Popek, W.; Łapiński, S. The chemical composition of the Eisenia fetida (Sav.). Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. Supl. 2001, 12, 357–363. [Google Scholar]
  46. Koreleski, J.; Ryś, R.; Kubicz, M.; Górska-Matusiak, Z.; Gawlik, Z. Nutritional value of California earthworm meal depending on the type of substrate and drying temperature. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 1994, 21, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  47. Taboga, L. The nutritional value of earthworms for chickens. Brit. Poult. Sci. 1980, 21, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bartnikowska, E.; Kulasek, G. The importance of unsaturated fatty acids in human and animal nutrition. Deficiencies and nutritional treatment of deficiencies. Vet. Mag. 1994, 4, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  49. Baltić, B.; Starčević, M.; Đorđević, J.; Mrdović, B.; Marković, R. Importance of medium chain fatty acids in animal nutrition. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 85, 012048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Isea-Leon, F.; Acosta-Balbias, V.; Rial-Betancoutd, L.B.; Medina-Gallardo, A.L.; Celestin, B.M. Evaluation of the fatty acid composition of earthworm Eisenia andrei meal as an alternative lipid source for fish feed. J. food Nutr. Res. 2019, 7, 696–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aluko, R.E. Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; 22p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gunya, B.; Masika, P.J.; Hugo, A.; Muchenje, V. Nutrient composition and fatty acid profiles of oven dried and freeze-dried earthworm Eisenia foetida. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2016, 4, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Paoletti, M.G.; Dufour, D.L.; Cerda, H.; Torres, F.; Pizzoferrato, L.; Pimental, D. The importance of leaf and litter feeding invertebrates as sources of animal protein for the Amazonian Amerindians. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2000, 267, 2247–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Paoletti, M.G.; Buscardo, E.; VanderJagt, D.J.; Pastuszyn, A.; Pizzoferrato, L.; Huang, Y.S.; Chuang, L.T.; Millson, M.; Cerda, H.; Torres, F.; et al. Nutrient content of earthworms consumed by Ye’Kuana Amerindians of the Alto Orinoco of Venezuela. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Medina, A.L.; Cova, J.A.; Vielma, R.A.; Pujic, P.; Carlos, M.P.; Torres, J.V. Immunological and chemical analysis of proteins from Eisenia foetida earthworm. Food Agric. Immunol. 2003, 15, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, Z.; Jiang, H. Nutritive Evaluation of Earthworms as Human Food. In Future Foods; Mikkola, H., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017; pp. 128–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moreno, A.G.; Paoletti, M.G. Andiorrhinus (Amazonidrilus) kuru sp. nov. (Oliogocheta: Glassoscolecidae), a giant earthworm as food resource for Makiritate Indians of the Alto RioPadamo, Amazonas, Venezuela. Can. J. Zool. 2004, 82, 1000–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Petrescu-Mag, R.M.; Kopaei, H.R.; Petrescu, D.C. Consumers’ acceptance of the first novel insect food approved in the European Union: Predictors of yellow mealworm chips consumption. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 846–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 20 03108 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) A single adult Dendrobaena veneta; and (b) as group taken from a bed for processing organic material.
Figure 1. (a) A single adult Dendrobaena veneta; and (b) as group taken from a bed for processing organic material.
Ijerph 20 03108 g001
Ijerph 20 03108 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic of a vermireactor, modified from Pączka et al. [37].
Figure 2. Schematic of a vermireactor, modified from Pączka et al. [37].
Ijerph 20 03108 g002
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition (%) of D. veneta cultivated in kitchen waste.
Table 1. Chemical composition (%) of D. veneta cultivated in kitchen waste.
TraitsD. veneta Content
in Dry Matter
dry mass100.0 ± 0.02
crude ash5.17 ± 0.01
total protein76.82 ± 0.38
crude fat12.21 ± 0.57
Table
Table 2. Content of amino acids (% DM) in the biomass of D. veneta cultivated on kitchen waste.
Table 2. Content of amino acids (% DM) in the biomass of D. veneta cultivated on kitchen waste.
Amino AcidsD. venetaE. fetida *Beef **Pork **Pattern Protein Egg **
Endogenous amino acids
Aspartic acid (Asp)8.22 ± 0.525.75 ± 2.03
Serine (Ser)3.83 ± 0.392.89 ± 0.85
Glutamic acid (Glu)8.94 ± 1.137.12 ± 1.72
Proline (Pro)2.55 ± 0.211.94 ± 0.15
Glycine (Gly)3.50 ± 0.692.59 ± 0.69
Alanine (Ala)3.48 ± 0.692.62 ± 0.69
Cysteine (Cys)0.84 ± 0.100.64 ± 0.18
Tyrosine (Tyr)2.16 ± 0.381.43 ± 0.39
Essential and semi-essential amino acids (EAA)
Phenylalanine (Phe)2.91 ± 0.402.3 ± 0.251.81.72.6
Histidine (His)1.62 ± 0.292.1 ± 0.281.51.71.2
Lysine (Lys)4.74 ± 0.514.9 ± 0.383.73.93.4
Methionine (Met)0.80 ± 0.081.1 ± 0.201.21.11.5
Threonine (Thr)2.34 ± 0.202.8 ± 0.431.72.02.2
Valine (Val)3.68 ± 0.443.8 ± 0.532.22.43.1
Tryptophan (Trp)——0.20.50.8
Isoleucine (Ile)3.05 ± 0.522.9 ± 0.412.02.02.5
Leucine (Leu)3.66 ± 0.456.2 ± 0.393.53.54.3
Arginine (Arg)5.16 ± 0.456.0 ± 0.332.92.73.2
Total EAA27.9632.120.721.524.8
CPSP (%)1.11.30.80.91
* Kostecka et al. [43] ** Ding et al. [44].
Table
Table 3. Content of fatty acids (%) in D. veneta cultivated in kitchen waste.
Table 3. Content of fatty acids (%) in D. veneta cultivated in kitchen waste.
Fatty Acids Profile
(% in Total Acids)
Fatty AcidsD. venetaE. fetida *
saturated fatty acids
Lauric acid C122.67 ± 0.163.60 ± 0.18
Tridecanic acid C130.16 ± 0.020.27 ± 0.04
Myristic acid C145.41 ± 0.155.64 ± 0.13
Pentadecanoic acid C150.29 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.03
Palmitic acid C1616.19 ± 0.217.06 ± 0.12
Heptadecanoic acid C170.51 ± 0.040.50 ± 0.02
Stearic acid C186.74 ± 0.226.45 ± 0.61
Kwas arachidowy C200.16 ± 0.010.12 ± 0.01
Behenic acid C221.09 ± 0.040.96 ± 0.06
Lignoceric acid C240.13 ± 0.010.12 ± 0.01
Total saturated acids33.3835.31 ± 0.64
monounsaturated fatty acids
Myristoleic acid C14:10.26 ± 0.020.33 ± 0.05
C15:10.15 ± 0.010.13 ± 0.01
Palmitoleic acid C16:14.77 ± 0.875.60 ± 0.76
C17:10.68 ± 0.120.79 ± 0.05
Oleic acid C18:130.68 ± 1.1431.05 ± 0.48
Eicosenoic acid C20:11.97 ± 0.281.88 ± 0.32
Euric acid C22:11.15 ± 0.160.56 ± 0.33
Total monounsaturated acids39.6740.860 ± 0.678
polyunsaturated fatty acids
C14:21.03 ± 0.071.24 ± 0.13
Linoleic acid C18:29.51 ± 0.179.77 ± 0. 42
Linolenic acid C18:31.21 ± 0.161.12 ± 0.17
Eicosadienic acid C20:20.70 ± 0.040.77 ± 0.08
Arachidonic acid C20:41.17 ± 0.71.24 ± 0.09
Docosapentaenoic acid C22:50.246 ± 0.030.13 ± 0.01
Clupandonic acid C22:60.730 ± 0.00.20 ± 0.04
Total polyunsaturated acids14.6214.487 ± 0.834
Unmarked10.029.645 ± 1.025
* Kostecka et al. [43].
Table
Table 4. Function and amount of selected fatty acids in the fat of composting earthworms (%).
Table 4. Function and amount of selected fatty acids in the fat of composting earthworms (%).
Fatty AcidFunctionD. venetaE. fetida
palmitic acidactivator of many enzymes16.19 ± 0.217.06 ± 0.12
oleic acidincreases the immunity of animals and prevents cardiovascular diseases30.68 ± 1.1431.05 ± 0.48
linoleic acidparticipates in the formation of prostaglandin PGE1 and prostacyclin, which regulate the tone of the walls of blood vessels9.51 ± 0.179.77 ± 0.42
eicosadienoic acid:is part of omega-3 fatty acids, contributing to the increase in immunity0.70 ± 0.040.77 ± 0.08
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garczyńska, M.; Kostecka, J.; Pączka, G.; Mazur-Pączka, A.; Cebulak, T.; Butt, K.R. Chemical Composition of Earthworm (Dendrobaena veneta Rosa) Biomass Is Suitable as an Alternative Protein Source. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043108

AMA Style

Garczyńska M, Kostecka J, Pączka G, Mazur-Pączka A, Cebulak T, Butt KR. Chemical Composition of Earthworm (Dendrobaena veneta Rosa) Biomass Is Suitable as an Alternative Protein Source. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garczyńska, Mariola, Joanna Kostecka, Grzegorz Pączka, Anna Mazur-Pączka, Tomasz Cebulak, and Kevin R. Butt. 2023. "Chemical Composition of Earthworm (Dendrobaena veneta Rosa) Biomass Is Suitable as an Alternative Protein Source" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop