Next Article in Journal
Nomophobia and Self-Esteem: A Cross Sectional Study in Greek University Students
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Andrews et al. Age at Arrival and Depression among Mexican Immigrant Women in Alabama: The Moderating Role of Culture. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5342
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Recognizing and Responding to Anti-Science in Environmental and Public Health Research and Practice

by
John Øvretveit
1,2
1
Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning Management Informatics and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Region Stockholm, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
2
Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(4), 2927; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042927
Submission received: 31 December 2022 / Revised: 31 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 8 February 2023

Abstract

This perspectives article considers the challenges posed by anti-science and how we can use research to respond more effectively. In public health, the challenges were more visible and the impact more serious during the COVID-19 pandemic. In part, this was due to a more organized anti-science and effective use of narrative methods. Regarding climate change, the role of anti-science represents a critical issue, but perhaps more recognized in environmental research and practice. The article draws on a narrative review to show some of the research into the nature of anti-science and the challenges it poses. It proposes that, as researchers, practitioners, and educationalists, we can be more effective if we make more use of recent research in the sciences of communications, behavior, and implementation, and shows some of the resources we can use to help our work be more relevant in the new era in which we are living.
Keywords: anti-science; narrative research; behavioral science; implementation anti-science; narrative research; behavioral science; implementation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Øvretveit, J. Recognizing and Responding to Anti-Science in Environmental and Public Health Research and Practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042927

AMA Style

Øvretveit J. Recognizing and Responding to Anti-Science in Environmental and Public Health Research and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(4):2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042927

Chicago/Turabian Style

Øvretveit, John. 2023. "Recognizing and Responding to Anti-Science in Environmental and Public Health Research and Practice" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 4: 2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042927

APA Style

Øvretveit, J. (2023). Recognizing and Responding to Anti-Science in Environmental and Public Health Research and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2927. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042927

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop