Next Article in Journal
Knowledge of Primary Care Patients Living in the Urban Areas about Risk Factors of Arterial Hypertension
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Cognitive Disturbances and Clinical Symptoms on Disability in Patients with Paranoid Schizophrenia: A Study of a Bulgarian Clinical Sample
Previous Article in Journal
Interventional Strategies to Reduce Test Anxiety among Nursing Students: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impaired Non-Selective Response Inhibition in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neurocognitive Impulsivity in Opiate Users at Different Lengths of Abstinence

by
Elena Psederska
1,2,* and
Jasmin Vassileva
3,4
1
Bulgarian Addictions Institute, 93 Antim I Str., 1303 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology, New Bulgarian University, 1618 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
4
Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(2), 1236; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021236
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 6 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in Translational Psychiatry)

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine the effects of length of abstinence on decision making (impulsive choice) and response inhibition (impulsive action) in former opiate users (OU). Participants included 45 OU in early remission [0–12 months of abstinence], 68 OU in sustained remission [>12 months of abstinence], and 68 control participants. Decision making was assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), the Cambridge Gambling Task (CGT), and the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ). Response inhibition was examined with the Stop Signal Task (SST), and the Go/No-Go Task (GNG). Results revealed group differences in decision making under risk (CGT) and ambiguity (IGT), where control participants displayed better decision making compared to OU in early remission. Both groups of former OU were also characterized by higher discounting of delayed rewards (MCQ). Regression analyses revealed minimal effects of length of abstinence on performance on decision-making tasks and no effects on delay discounting. In addition, both OU groups showed reduced action inhibition (GNG) relative to controls and there were no group differences in action cancellation (SST). Length of abstinence had no effect on response inhibition. Overall, our findings suggest that neurocognitive function may not fully recover even with protracted abstinence, which should be addressed by relapse prevention and cognitive remediation programs for OU.
Keywords: decision making; response inhibition; opiate use; length of abstinence decision making; response inhibition; opiate use; length of abstinence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Psederska, E.; Vassileva, J. Neurocognitive Impulsivity in Opiate Users at Different Lengths of Abstinence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021236

AMA Style

Psederska E, Vassileva J. Neurocognitive Impulsivity in Opiate Users at Different Lengths of Abstinence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(2):1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Psederska, Elena, and Jasmin Vassileva. 2023. "Neurocognitive Impulsivity in Opiate Users at Different Lengths of Abstinence" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 2: 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021236

APA Style

Psederska, E., & Vassileva, J. (2023). Neurocognitive Impulsivity in Opiate Users at Different Lengths of Abstinence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop