Next Article in Journal
The Influence of the Big Five Personality Traits on Residents’ Plastic Reduction Attitudes in China
Previous Article in Journal
Predictors of Psychological Strain and Allostatic Load in Teachers: Examining the Long-Term Effects of Biopsychosocial Risk and Protective Factors Using a LASSO Regression Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Public Perceptions of Flavored Waterpipe Smoking on Twitter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations

1
Collaboration for Evidence, Research and Impact in Public Health, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
2
Internet Studies, School of Media, Creative Arts and Social Inquiry, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
3
School of Marketing, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
4
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
5
School of Population Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
6
School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
7
UWA Law School, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(10), 5761; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105761
Submission received: 3 March 2023 / Revised: 22 March 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 9 May 2023

Abstract

E-cigarettes are promoted extensively on TikTok and other social media platforms. Platform policies to restrict e-cigarette promotion seem insufficient and are poorly enforced. This paper aims to understand how e-cigarettes are being promoted on TikTok and provide insights into the effectiveness of current TikTok policies. Seven popular hashtag-based keywords were used to identify TikTok accounts and associated videos related to e-cigarettes. Posts were independently coded by two trained coders. Collectively, the 264 videos received 2,470,373 views, 166,462 likes and 3426 comments. The overwhelming majority of videos (97.7%) portrayed e-cigarettes positively, and these posts received 98.7% of the total views and 98.2% of the total likes. A total of 69 posts (26.1%) clearly violated TikTok’s own content policy. The findings of the current study suggest that a variety of predominantly pro-vaping content is available on TikTok. Current policies and moderation processes appear to be insufficient in restricting the spread of pro-e-cigarette content on TikTok, putting predominantly young users at potential risk of e-cigarette use.
Keywords: e-cigarettes; public health; social media; TikTok; vaping; young adults e-cigarettes; public health; social media; TikTok; vaping; young adults

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jancey, J.; Leaver, T.; Wolf, K.; Freeman, B.; Chai, K.; Bialous, S.; Bromberg, M.; Adams, P.; Mcleod, M.; Carey, R.N.; et al. Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 5761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105761

AMA Style

Jancey J, Leaver T, Wolf K, Freeman B, Chai K, Bialous S, Bromberg M, Adams P, Mcleod M, Carey RN, et al. Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(10):5761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jancey, Jonine, Tama Leaver, Katharina Wolf, Becky Freeman, Kevin Chai, Stella Bialous, Marilyn Bromberg, Phoebe Adams, Meghan Mcleod, Renee N. Carey, and et al. 2023. "Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 10: 5761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105761

APA Style

Jancey, J., Leaver, T., Wolf, K., Freeman, B., Chai, K., Bialous, S., Bromberg, M., Adams, P., Mcleod, M., Carey, R. N., & McCausland, K. (2023). Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop